Wood backdrop by the Twin City Scenic Co. 1907. This is part of a collection that I restored in 2002.
Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907Twin City Scenic Co. Wood drop, 1907The Brown Grand Theatre, Concordia, Kansas.The Brown Grand Theatre, Concordia, Kansas.The Brown Grand Theatre, Concordia, Kansas.
In June 1923, Thomas G. Moses presented a model to the Binghamton Scottish Rite for their new theater. He painted the scenery during September and October of that year. Moses’ payment for painting the scenery was $2500. It remains uncertain if this amount also covered travel and lodging expenses.
In June 1924 Moses wrote, “On June 2nd, I received $365.00 balance due from Binghamton. I had about given up all hopes of getting it.” Moses completed his work for the Binghamton Scottish Rite scenery project seven months earlier, just before the building opened in November 1923.
$365 was approximately 15% of the project, likely the amount due upon installation. To put this in perspective, $2500 in 1923 is the equivalent of approximately $38,080.99 today. The amount that Moses was waiting for ($365) was today’s equivalent of $5,559.83.
It is hard enough when a payment is past due, and there is no indication of when those funds will appear. Then there is the additional time you spend on a project trying to collect. Creating each additional invoice, letter, email or phone call all adds up, pecking away at your salary. I think of Sosman & Landis representatives traveling across the country to collect final payment, the additional travel fees and lodging. When several clients decide to not pay in a timely manner, it becomes a big problem.
For Moses, this was an ongoing problem during the early twentieth-century with Scottish Rite projects. They would not pay that final payment, no matter how large or small. I have to wonder how the Masons justified non-payment for the craftsmen. It flies in the face of what Masonry teaches.
In 1923, Thomas G. Moses painted the scenery for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Binghamton, NY. He was assisted by Edward Loitz, earning $2,500 to paint forty drops for the stage. Moses and Loitz were subcontracted by New York Studios for the work.
Home to the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite in Binghamton, New York.
On October 17, 1923, the “Binghamton Press and Leader” reported, “Thomas G. Moses of Chicago. Representing New York Studios, who is painting scenery, curtains and drops for the stage in the auditorium of the Masonic Temple under construction at Main and Murray streets.” On Nov. 21, 1923, the “Binghamton Press and Leader” reported, “The scenery for the auditorium was painted by the Sosman & Landis Co. of Chicago at a cost of $12,000. Much of this scenery was painted in the temple by Thomas G. Moses, scenic artist of this concern” (page 17). So why did the newspaper change from crediting associating Moses with New York Studios to Sosman & Landis over the course of a month?
Well, between Oct. 17 and Nov. 21, Moses realized that Hunt of New York studios had royally screwed him over. My guess is that Moses walked to the newspapers office and said, “When you mention my name again, make sure to add that I am representing Sosman & Landis.”
To briefly recap…Moses and Megan were in the process of purchasing the Sosman & Landis name, but could not until the company was liquidated (which would be in December). By the summer of 1923, Chicago Studios began using the Sosman & Landis address before just after negotiations with Moses stipulated that he could not use the company name until after the firm was completely. Moses’ negotiations were with Hunt of New York Studios, who was also running Sosman & Landis at the time. Chicago Studios started using the address, they sent out letters to Sosman & Landis clients announcing that they the successors to Sosman & Landis, just under a new name. Furthermore,
Moses & Megan immediately disputed the information circulated by Chicago Studios once they became aware of the deceit, sending out letters of their own and explaining that firm had not closed, just moved to a new location. On November 13, 1923, Moses and Megan sent a letter to the Scottish Rite in Salina, Kansas, writing “Dear Sir: It has recently some to our attention that a certain studio is advertising our old customers that they have bought the Sosman & Landis Company and are now operating same, combining it with their original company. We wish to assure you this is not a fact and that our original organization is intact, but our studio has been moved to better quarters.”
So, in the midst of the massive Binghamton Scottish Rite project, where Moses was painting on site for Hunt, Moses realized that Hunt had betrayed him. This is likely the reason that the second article about the scenery stated Sosman & Landis as the firm, and not New York Studios. Moses knew what Hunt was trying to do; Hunt was trying to discredit the new iteration of Sosman & Landis, the one that Moses and Megan would run. In the end, the scenery was credited to New York Studios. Moses never listed the Binghamton Scottish Rite in his resumé.
The Binghamton Scottish Rite was a massive undertaking and significant job, a credit to any studio. The Temple boasted 1,000,000 cubic feet, built at an expense of $400,000 The architects of the endeavor were Walter H. Whitlock and Charles H. Conrad of Binghamton, with the general work being done by the Mitchell Construction Co. On Nov. 21, 1923, the “Binghamton Press and Leader,” described, “Upon entering the main portal on Main street, one finds a large hall, or foyer. From this foyer one may enter the auditorium, the secretary’s rooms, a stairway and the elevator which reaches all floors. The auditorium, which is in the form of an amphitheater, occupies the greater part of the ground floor, first floor and first floor mezzanine. It has 4,700 square feet of floor space, in 28 feet in height and will seat 800 persons. It is connected with the stage by an opening 32 feet wide by 22 feet high. The stage, 1,720 square feet in area, is 30 feet deep, 57 feet wide and 58 feet high. There are 50 complete sets of scenery. At the sides of the stage, on three levels, are robing rooms representing 2,400 square feet of space” (page 17).
The fifty-seventh annual reunion of Otseningo Bodies, Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite, in the Valley of Binghamton, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, United States of America, was held from Nov. 20-22. It was held in the new Masonic temple at Main and Murray streets. The Reunion was held in conjunction with the dedication of the new Temple.
The Scottish Rite class for the reunion was composed of 350 candidates from the six counties in the jurisdiction. Present membership at the time was approximately 1,800 members.
On Nov. 21, 1923, the “Binghamton Press and Leader” reported, “This is the largest class of the Scottish Rite in the history of Masonry in Binghamton.” The class was named the Longley-Wear class in honor of the Rt. Rev. Harry S. Longley of Des Moines, Iowa, suffragan bishop of Iowa, a former rector of Christ church in Binghamton, and D. Walker Wear, one of the most prominent Masonic in Binghamton who had a large part in the erection of the new temple.
The ceremony of consecrating the new consistory was followed by several speeches, including Bishop Langley. On Nov. 23, 1923, the “Binghamton Press and Leader” reported, “Bishop Longley told the members that those who have in the present week taken the degrees that teach the ideals of Scottish Rite Masonry must have come to realize what a tremendous force and power masonry can wield in a world crying out for leadership. These masonic ideals must sway any movement for the reconstruction of the destruction that was started nine years ago in Europe, He declared that it is becoming more and more realized that any solution of world unrest must have as a foundation the spiritual truths taught in masonry. Civilization is at stake and he urged all to do their part by standing up for their ideals and maintaining and abiding faith in the omnipotence and goodness of God.”
The structure opened to great fanfare, with numerous articles about the endeavor, announcing “Masonic Temple is in First Rank of State Fraternal Buildings” (Binghamton Press and Leader, 17 Nov 1923 page 17). Unfortunately, this was Moses’ last painting for the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction. The rest of his fraternal work would shift to solely the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction.
Plans for the Binghamton Scottish Rite theaterPlans for the Binghamton Scottish Rite theaterPlans for the Binghamton Scottish Rite theater
A leg drop and cut drop painted by Toomey & Volland Scenic Studio for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Richmond, Virginia. These two pieces were relocated to the Scottish Rite in Tucson, Arizona last month (Jan 2021). When the Richmond Scottish Rite moved to a new building in 1968, one-third of the scenery collection was placed in storage. These two drops were rolled and placed in storage, high above the properties room, stage-left. However, the backdrop to accompany the scene is missing.
All three pieces formed a classical rotunda setting for the 30th degree (Scottish Rite degree setting). We know what the missing backdrop looked like, as this same scene was delivered to the Louisville Scottish Rite.
Backdrop design that would have accompanied the Richmond leg drop and cut drop. This backdrop is from the Louisville Scottish Rite.Second leg drop at the Louisville Scottish Rite.First leg drop at the Louisville Scottish Rite.Painted detail. Richmond Scottish Rite scenery.Painted detail. Richmond Scottish Rite scenery.Painted detail. Richmond Scottish Rite scenery.Painted detail. Richmond Scottish Rite scenery.Painted detail. Richmond Scottish Rite scenery.
Unfortunately, the two leg drops were repositioned at the Louisville Scottish Rite and the setting can no longer be viewed as originally installed. The two leg drops were erroneously placed on neighboring lines.
In 1923, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “I put in fully a week in Binghamton at the Arlington Hotel on designs for Masonic work and I believe we will get the contract.”
Arlington Hotel in Binghamton, New York
Sosman & Landis didn’t get the contract but Moses still painted the scenery. Somehow, David Hunt of New York Studios landed the profitable contract. Keep in mind that New York Studios was the eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis, and Sosman & Landis was preparing to close.
From the “Press and Sun Bulletin,” 21 Nov 1923, page 17.
By summer, Moses wrote, “I have arranged to go to Binghamton, N.Y. for Hunt, $2,500.00 for the job. Sent Loitz on ahead, September 5th.”
Moses was referring to Ed Loitz. Loitz, who had worked with Moses since the 1883. He was a loyal painting assistant and friend who had followed Moses across the country, working alongside him wherever he went. Whether Moses had established a partnership, or was working at Sosman & Landis, Loitz was there. Loitz traveled one step ahead, preparing the next jobsite for Moses’ arrival and then workied on site. Loitz was almost a decade younger than Moses, being born in 1865. In 1923, they had been working together for forty years together. At the time, Moses was sixty-seven years old and Loitz was fifty-eight years old. Loitz was both a scenic artist and carpenter, taking care of everything needed before Moses arrived on site to paint.
Scenery painted by Thomas G. Moses, assisted by Ed Loitz. From the “Press and Sun Bulletin,” 21 Nov 1923, page 17.Scenery painted by Thomas G. Moses, assisted by Ed Loitz. From the “Press and Sun Bulletin,” 21 Nov 1923, page 17.
Moses was still splitting his time between painting for Hunt (New York Studios) and Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis were in the process of liquidating all assets and closing their doors. Moses and Fred Megan were waiting to purchase the name.
The New York Studios project was the stock scenery collection for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Binghamton, New York. This project was completed was just before Moses realized that Chicago Studios was sending out letters to Sosman & Landis clients, explaining that they were the successor to Sosman & Landis, already having secured the same address. David S. Hunt was behind the establishment of Chicago Studios, as well as running both New York Studios and Sosman & Landis. Even though he knew Moses was going to purchase the Sosman & Landis name after the company liquidated their assets, Hunt was using his position at Sosman & Landis to his advantage to discredit any new iteration of Sosman & Landis. This would all happen in November 1923 while he was on site in Binghamton.
On October 17, 1923, Binghamton’s “Press and Sun-Bulletin” featured Moses and his work. The article was entitled “Vies with Nature in Realms of Beauty,” and stated, “Thomas G. Moses Wields a Well-nigh Magic Brush in Painting Scenery, Curtains and Drops for New Masonic Temple.” Here is the article in its entirety:
“Thomas G. Moses of Chicago. Representing New York Studios, who is painting scenery, curtains and drops for the stage in the auditorium of the Masonic Temple under construction at Main and Murray streets, need no assistance of Brownies or other mystical helpers in making things beautiful in the opinion of those who have seen examples of his work.
Fairyland in all its mystical wonderfulness could not surpass the beauty that is represented on the canvas with the paint from the brushes carefully wielded by Moses. Mechanical curtains on which a moon may be seen rising, Persian temple interiors and water, wooded and open scenes are all in the new temple to bring admiration from all the Masons who are privileged to see them all.
Forty drops are being painted by Mr. Moses.”
[Moses was being paid $2,500 dollars for the project, so we can estimate that his average painting fee per drop was no more than $62.50/each, assuming he wasn’t paying for travel, lodging or meals out of that amount. The money equivalent of $62.50 in 1923 is $952.02 in 2021.The contract was for $12,000]
“Each set is used for some one of the 32 degrees prescribed in the ranks of the fraternity. Each degree is exemplified in a different setting. Some are on the plains, others in a temple painted from Biblical descriptions of King Solomon’s temple, extensive Egyptian quarries and water scenes.
The full equipment will be used for the first time on Nov. 18, 19 and 20, when the annual reunion of Otseningo Consistory, Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite, will be held. Exemplification of degree work at that time will be the first that it has been done in full form in four years. Equipment of the Masonic body was destroyed four years ago in a fire in the temple on Chenango street.
All paintings of the scenery are done by Mr. Moses from scale drawings which he completed several months ago. The small scale drawings were drawn from outlines by officers of lodges here. Mr. Moses on a platform suspended from the top of the loft sketches in charcoal on the canvass the scene which he wishes to paint.
Mr. Moses is assisted by Edward Loitz, who has traveled from coast to coast with Mr. Moses working on many contracts. Installation of the drops is supervised by H. E. Naile. The three men have worked together in many cities, their last contract being in Little Rock, Ark.
The stage in the temple here and the scenery and drops being painted are the largest ever handled in a Masonic Temple by Mr. Moses. He says he is well satisfied with the progress of his work and in a short time it will be finished. He expects to remain here to paint some work for another temple.
Products of the brush of Mr. Moses and his assistant, Mr. Loitz, are not entirely new to Binghamton. Mr. Moses painted the landscapes and architectural exteriors for the State hospital theater and Mr. Loitz did the interiors. Mr. Moses painted the original scenery for the Stone Opera House and upon visiting that place a few days ago he found some of the equipment still in use.
Tom Moses, as he is nationally known, was found today busily engaged in painting a drop 21 feet by 40 feet representing an interior of an old German chapel. The picture is complete with stained glass windows and the chapel is profusely decorated with flags, shields and bits of armor.
Tom Moses’ father was a captain of a sailing vessel and when he left the bounding main he started a leather business. He intended his son should follow his footsteps. The world might have been richer with a reliable captain or an expert on leather, but Tom had ideas for a different vocation, and thus the world has not been deprived of a master painter who transfers the sometimes unreal to the real with an intricate movement of his paint brush.
All this was 45 years ago. During the 45 years he has been painting scenery, Mr. Moses has gained much praise throughout the land. His friends are legion. He is short and stocky and has a radiating personality that brings a friendly reception wherever he goes and he has no enemies.
Born in Liverpool, England, in 1856, more than 67 years ago, of English parentage, Mr. Moses came to America with his father and mother but when a little child and settled in Sterling, Ill. His father was a sea captain and later a tanner. Tom’s mother, who died when he was but a youngster, possessed an exceedingly artistic nature and did much to install into her son the love of artistic.
Tom’s father was strict and was certain that the boy would be “better off” as a tanner with his brawny arms wrestling with a piece of hairy hide and covered with tannin. Use of a hickory switch proved to Tom that this would probably be much after his father declared only starvation faced the starving artists.
One try at the tanning game convinced Tom that he would rather be an artist. At the age of 17 he left home “with a forwarding address.” He hired out as a paint boy in the Chicago studio of P. M. Almini. Louis Malmsha, director of the company, recognized the ability in the recently hired paint boy. In a year he had advanced in wages from $4 a week to $21, but the rapid rise was due to his persevering work.
Robert Hopkin, a scenic artist in Detroit, Mich., was the next person to obtain the services of the rising artist. At the age of 20 he returned to his home and married Miss Ella Robbin. The couple lived there until 1880 when they went to Chicago where Mr. Moses started working for the Sosman & Landis Co. He painted the first work of this concern.
In his long and varied career, Mr. Moses has done work for many famous artists and for many famous productions. It was he who designed and executed the original “Floradora” sets for John C. Fisher. He did them, not only once, but four times. The work of Tom Keene, John McCullough, Booth and Barrett, Col. Cody (Buffalo Bill), Julia Marlowe, Robert Lober, Joseph Murphy, Conried and Herman, Emma Abbott, Emma Juch, Sarah Bernhardt, Mme. Modjeska, and score of other greater and lesser figures of the American stage was enhanced by scenery executed by Thomas G. Moses.
Some of the famous productions, in addition to “Floradora,” which Mr. Moses has made are “Shenandoah,” and “Old Kentucky,” famous melodramas; “Marie Antoinette,” “Mary Stuart” and “Macbeth” for Mme. Modjeska; “Judas” for Mme. Bernhardt. Joseph Jefferson’s last “Rip Van Winkle”; “The Holy City,” “By Right Sword,” “Lost in the Desert,” “Quo Vadis,” “The Witch,” “Robinson Crusoe,” “Ben Hur” and scores of other big productions.
He has also produced some of those famous Luna Park spectacles at Coney Island, such as “Fire and Flames,” “The War of the Worlds,” “Trip to the Moon,” “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea,” “The Streets of Delhi” and others. “The Streets of Delhi” was produced at a cost of $100,000.
In the art world outside of scene painting he has received much recognition. He has the distinction of being a member of the world-famous Salmagundi club, that noted organization of artists in New York. Mr. Moses is also a member of the Chicago Society of Arts, the famous Palette and Chisel Club, the California Art Club of Los Angeles and the Laguna Art association of Laguna Beach, Cal.
Rapid advance of motion pictures has crimped the scenic painting industry, Mr. Moses says. “Because of the fewer number of dramatic shows now there is a less demand for drops. Movies take the place of the dramatic productions that one time held sway.”
Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902Painted detail. Cut drop by Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri, c. 1902
The cut drop was part of a palatial scene for King Darius (16th degree), but was also used to supplement stage settings for King Cyrus (15th degree) – despite the different time periods.Here is a link for more information about my preliminary site visit to the Richmond Scottish Rite in October 2020
We all struggle on a daily basis, and yet overcome many obstacles that seem insurmountable at the time. However, there are also those moments when we don’t persevere, the ones that mark our soul. For me, writing this blog provides daily solace during challenging times. I am able to escape into the past and share challenges faced by others. Somehow, telling their stories brings peace to my own.
It is especially comforting for me when voices from the past share fears of the present. Ninety-nine years ago, scenic artist Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934) wrote a passage that is applicable for many today.
In 1923 he wrote, “While I realize what one short year will do for one’s business, I cannot help having a chill from what has happened to us all during that time. When I look forward and wonder what is apt to happen, I try to be optimistic and see nothing but silver lining and feel that the turning point has been passed and the road is cleared, and the travel will be comparatively easy.”
This is one of the 73 drops relocated from the Scottish Rite Theatre in Richmond, Virginia, to the Scottish Rite in Tucson, Arizona this month. The backdrop was painted by Toomey & Volland Scenic Studio for the Richmond Scottish Rite. When the Richmond Scottish Rite moved to a new building in 1968, one-third of the scenery collection was placed in storage. This backdrop was rolled and placed in storage, high above the properties room, stage-left.
Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatreScenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatrePainted detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite TheatreFabric detail. Scenery by Toomey & Volland for the Richmond Scottish Rite Theatre
Sosman & Landis’ main studio was located at 417 – 419 S. Clinton Street in Chicago. Constructed by the firm’s founders in 1880, it was an ideal space to design, build and paint scenery. Over the years, they supplemented this main studio with a variety of annex studios, but the firm’s address was always on S. Clinton Street. As with other large scenic studios, they rented space to not only other scenic artists, but also other scenic studios. After WWI and a general decline in demand for painted scenery, they continued this practice, renting to former employees and associates. In short, it helped reduce overhead. In 1922, Sosman & Landis rented space to Charles L. Hoyland and William Lemle of the Hoyland-Lemle Company. State business filings in 1922 listed the Hoyland-Lemle address as 417 S. Clinton Street, the same as Sosman & Landis.
Here is where it starts to get interesting, although a bit complicated. In 1923, Sosman & Landis closed its doors and liquidated their assets. Thomas G. Moses partnered with Fred R. Megan to purchase the Sosman & Landis name, planning to charter a second iteration of the company. Until Sosman & Landis was completely liquidated, however, Moses and Megan could not officially begin their new business venture. Therefore, they temporarily conducted business under the name Moses & Megan. All the while, Moses was still working at Sosman & Landis, finishing up contracts before the company closed.
While waiting to secure the Sosman & Landis name, Moses recorded that they leased the “old Fabric Studio,” adding that they plenty of work in sight, but intended to “hustle for more.” Initially, I believed that Moses and Megan rented Fabric Studios shop, located at 117 N. State Street in Chicago. The Fabric Studios of Chicago was a firm that appeared at this same time. My current research, however, suggests that that they actually rented the fabric studio in the Sosman & Landis shop at 417 S. Clinton street, simply biding their time until they officially opened the new Sosman & Landis Company. It would make sense, as it provided a separate space in the same building that Moses worked at every day, and a business address.
Enter, David Hunt and the Chicago Studios. Hunt had worked at Sosman & Landis since 1889 in various capacities. He helped establish the theatrical management firm of Sosman, Landis & Hunt in 1894, as well as found New York Studios, an affiliate of Sosman & Landis. Over the years, Hunt was identified as a Secretary, Treasurer and President of Sosman & Landis. It is Hunt’s establishment of New York Studios, partially funded by Sosman & Landis, that is of import as it shows a pattern.
Hunt’s second wife, Adelaide A. Hunt, was involved with New York Studios from the beginning, and became president of the company. Adelaide was also involved with establishing the Chicago Studios. This meant that David Hunt was intimately involved with three companies, Sosman & Landis, New York Studios and The Chicago Studios. Although it looked like three separate firms, they were not entirely independent of each other, and there was one man running the show behind the screen.
In 1922, the Chicago Studios was located at 15 W. 20th St. The officers of the firm on file with the State were Frank Cain of 139 N. Clark St., Chicago and A. A. Hunt of 328 N. 39th St., New York, NY. After Sosman & Landis was liquidated, Chicago Studios moved into the old Sosman & Landis space acquiring the well-known address 417-419 S. Clinton St. At this same time, the studio contents were purchased by Charles L. Hoyland and William Lemle of the Hoyland-Lemle Company. This made sense, as Hoyland-Lemle leased the space for over a year and likely had their own stock mixed with that of Sosman & Landis.
However, in 1923, Moses also mentioned trying to get Hoyland and Lemle “out.” This suggested that he was considering renting the main studio space for himself and Megan. At this time Moses also wrote “D.S. Hunt is also bobbing about for the lease of the studio.” Hunt was banking on the studio space too. In the end, Hunt did acquire the lease for the studio under the guise of the Chicago Studios. And this is what prompted a series of obstacles for Moses, as Hunt saw an opportunity took advantage of it.
Keep in mind that Hunt was part of the negotiations that requested Moses wait until the company was liquidated before he officially started working under the Sosman & Landis name. He also tried to get Moses on board with his own endeavor; asking him to stay in the studio.
Moses wrote, “Hunt wants me to remain in the studio, but I can’t see it.” In hindsight, this meant that Hunt wanted Moses to work for Chicago Studios and not pursue purchasing the Sosman & Landis name. If Moses and Megan opened a new “Sosman & Landis Company” they would directly compete with Chicago Studios.
In short, there were two firms going after Sosman & Landis clients – Moses and Hunt. Each were planning to use their institutional memory of the company to succeed in landing future projects.
This also meant that two scenic studios were going to market themselves as the successor of Sosman & Landis. Moses purchased the Sosman & Landis name. Chicago Studios purchased the Sosman & Landis address.
It was never a fair contest. By the fall of 1923, the Chicago Studios began advertising that they were continuing Sosman & Landis under a new name. They jumped the gun, and this move put Moses on the defensive; he never stood a chance to win. Hunt cheated and used Moses abiding by the criteria established in the negotiations to win. Chicago studios sent out letters and estimates to past Sosman & Landis clients, well in advance of the studio final liquidation. What this move did is make and new iteration of Sosman & Landis appear fraudulent and weak.
Moses & Megan immediately disputed the information circulated by Chicago Studios, sending out letters of their own. Their letters tried to explain that firm had not closed, just moved to a new location. That an unrelated studio was leasing the space and falsely marketing themselves. There was no way to make this look good, and they knew it. Keep in mind that the main studio on Clinton Street had remained the official Sosman & Landis address for over thirty years. This created a very awkward situation, as there is no way to state leaving the Sosman & Landis “home” to a better location. The studio was well known as one of the best in the country. It cast a negative light on all potential business dealings. In short, it looked like they were downsizing due to lack of work.
On November 13, 1923, Moses and Megan sent a letter to the Scottish Rite in Salina, Kansas. There was a stamp at the top in red ink: “MOVED Executive Offices. Now located at 6751 Sheridan Road.”
Moses and Megan wrote:
“Dear Sir:
It has recently some to our attention that a certain studio is advertising our old customers that they have bought the Sosman & Landis Company and are now operating same, combining it with their original company. We wish to assure you this is not a fact and that our original organization is intact, but our studio has been moved to better quarters.”
This was likely the beginning to every client, before taking on something personal. For the Salina Scottish Rite, the letter continued:
“Mr. Thomas G. Moses, our Art Director would like the opportunity of meeting with your scenery committee to submit our designs and specifications covering your requirements. You will perhaps recall that we were favored with your original scenery order, working through the M. C. Lilley Co, and therefore, it is not necessary for us to give you any reference to our ability and quality of our workmanship.”
1923 Letter to the Salina Scottish Rite by Sosman & Landis.
This is one of the 73 drops relocated from the Scottish Rite Theatre in Richmond, Virginia, to the Scottish Rite in Tucson, Arizona this month. The backdrop was painted by Toomey & Volland Scenic Studio for the Richmond Scottish Rite. When the Richmond Scottish Rite moved to a new building in 1968, one-third of the scenery collection was placed in storage. This backdrop was rolled and placed in storage, high above the properties room, stage-left.
Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.Painted detail. Scenery By Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, Missouri.