I was asked to teach a three-day distemper scene painting class at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House last fall. The workshop would coincide with my delivering new ground rows to the theatre. It was scheduled immediately before the 19th-century Scenic Art conference on August 2, 2024.
Flyers advertised:
The Tyne Theatre & Opera House are offering a 3-day distemper painting workshop with scenic painter Wendy Waszut-Barrett. The course will take place in Newcastle from Tuesday 30 July – Thursday 1 August 2024. Over 3days participants will learn historic painting techniques and create 2 paintings using distemper. All equipment including painting frames, brushes, pigments, gloves, etc. will be provided. A maximum of 12 places are available.
Day One: Introduction to Distemper Painting/Distemper Paint Preparation/ Colour Theory/English and Continental Methods
Day Two: Seascape Project
Day Three: Drapery Project
I have continued to fine-tune both the timeline and projects for my distemper painting classes; it has taken me years to come up with a framework for this type of workshop. First and foremost, it is extremely important to devote one entire day to color theory and experiencing the nuances of distemper paint.
I always try to start with a presentation about color; selection, mixing and application. Revisiting color theory as a group places all the students on the same page. It levels the playing field before trying to replicate any artwork, or understand a new application technique.
Title slide for my presentation on the first day at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House, 2024.
My rationale is that when you discuss color as a group, it is much easier to understand the various characteristics.
I tweak my color theory presentation for each class. It helps me grow as an instructor, allowing me revisit my own thoughts each time. I was extremely fortunate to have such a wonderful group of students and one stellar assistant (pictured below)!
Distemper Painting Workshop Students (from left to right): Laura O’Connell, Grit Eckert (assistant), Caroline Shelley, Erin Fleming, Claire Thompson, Emily Hackett, Michael O’Reilly, Megumi, Paul Westcombe, Yvonne Dick, and Constanza Dessain.
As promised to the class, here is the color theory section of my presentation.
One of the easiest ways to teach color theory for painted illusion on stage is using distemper paint. Pure color (pigment paste) is combined with diluted hide glue (size).
The ingredients for distemper paint: dry pigment and hide glue
Mixed on the scenic artist’s palette, it was immediately applied to the fabric. The constant mixing of strategic color combinations worked with various lighting systems to promote special effects on stage. This is why so most extant drops could transition from day-to-night scenes.
It is VERY important to not get caught up in the name of any one color, as it is the characteristic that’s important – warm or cool.
The easiest way to show color characteristics is with yellow. On the left is a “warm” yellow, and on the right is a “cool” yellow. It is very important to know the various characteristics of the colors that you are planning to mix.
Warm yellow (left) and cool yellow (right)
The characteristic greatly affects the result in a color wheel or when mixing neutrals.
Here is an example of a color wheel with primary and secondary colors clearly marked on the ring. However, it will shift if a warm or cool yellow is combined with a warm or cool red to produce an orange. This ultimately affects the creation of neutrals.
For example, green will shift if blue is combined with a warm yellow or cool yellow.
Also, combining blue with orange produces wonderful variations for shadows that reflect both warm and cool lights.
We are familiar with spattering a drop to make sure that it will glow on stage, as some contemporary colors look “dead” under certain lighting conditions. That is never the case with distemper painting, as the actual painting process ensures that every color will reflect light.
For example, a blue sky, always has a little warmth (orange/red/burnt sienna) added to the color, and this allows a sky to transition from a beautiful sunrise to midday to sunset. The same can be said for mixing shadow colors and washes, whether applied as a transparent glaze or an opaque wash.
This (orange/blue) color combination appeared on historic scenery in North American, the UK, and Europe. Here is an example from the Stadsschouwburg (Municipal Theatre), Kortrijk, Belgium.
Matching colors to replicate a composition at the Stadsschouwburg, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Working with a minimal color palette in the beginning works best for understanding distemper paint. I love to show Tobias Mayer’s color triangle from 1758. It looks at a unique combination of primaries (blue, red, and yellow). In the end, it is important to select four colors (blue, red, yellow, and dark) when exploring strategic color combinations for the stage.
Once strategic combinations are understood, we move on to the application and an economy of brush stroke.
Here is an example of a floral detail from a palatial courtyard scene.
There is a basic contrast of value that must be used for painted illusion on stage. This is crucial when painting for a distance. The audience’s eye really needs to work.
When a subject is finely painted, with careful blending, like in the art of trompe l’oeil, it does not read well from a distance. I will later go into depth about this when we get to the drapery painting project.
The flower below shows a selection of dark, medium, and light colors without any careful blending. There is a distinct contrast of color and value.
Each of these values also alternates between warm and cool. The dark-medium-light values alternate cool-warm-cool or warm-cool-warm.
Even when the same value is used (pictured below), there is an alternation of warm and cool. The strategic color placement for the foliage allows the object to shift under stage lights and appear more realistic from a distance. It reads better from the audience and does not appear flat.
Our first exercise explored both color and painting process.
Here are a few examples of my own color swatches. Before any distemper painting process, I familiarize myself with the colors, even if I have used them before. This often includes a “draw-down” so that I also know how far a color will stretch.
I divided the first project into four quadrants. The intent was for the students experiment with color and viscosity of the distemper palette.
The first step helps facilitate a basic understanding of mixing pigment paste and size. Creating basic color swatches helps us understand not only the color’s characteristic, but also how far the color will extend when thinned out.
Swatches that I keep on the wall in my studio.
I believe that everyone needs a moment to experiment with a new type of paint – where the stakes are very low. It is too much to expect students to immediately replicate a stage scene with distemper paint; too much new information actually creates an obstacle to learning. This is the moment to “play” without any self-judgement.
The second quadrant of the first project was to test the opacity and value of each color. It was an opportunity to also experiment with neutrals that would be used on the upcoming projects. I firmly believe that if you know the range of your color palette (what colors can be achieved), you are one step ahead of the game.
Typically, the next two quadrants of the first project would be two color wheels. However, for this class we jumped into base coats – practicing for the next two projects.
In the end, this proved invaluable, as each student had a chance to work with color combinations and application techniques that would be used in both their seascape and drapery projects.
Constanza Dessain testing colors on the first day of the workshop.
We learned a lot that first day while overcoming a few obstacles. The stage lighting proved to be a bit of a challenge, as did the fabric weight.
Starting to experiment with distemper paint on the first day.
I will start with the fabric and pigments.
Although not quite what I expected, the workshop fabric was the same texture and weight that I have encountered with dozens of historic drops, c. 1890-1920.
It was a cross between a theatrical gauze and very thin cotton sheeting. The silver lining was that each composition could function as a transparency – another great learning opportunity!
Here are the slides that I added in my presentation to address this particular aspect/challenge of the projects:
I first explained the similarity in materials that I had documented throughout my career. Mill stamps are a delight to find on an extant scene. The fabric delivered for the workshop was almost identical to that used by J. M. Deeds Scenic Studio in Spokane, Washington, in 1915.
Fine sheeting (c. 1914) produced by Delta Mills in North America was very similar to the fabric purchased for the workshop.
As is the case with most painted scenery, when lit from the front, it all looks opaque. In many cases, it even looks like the painting is on the thickest canvas available. And here is where I want to take a moment and comment on industry standards and variables.
We take it for granted that the scenery fabrics in current use have remained mostly unchanged over the years. That is simply not the case; nor was it the case a century ago. Materials are always dependent upon location, supply, demand, budgetary parameters, and world events.
I agree that there was some consistency in larger metropolitan areas. This was primarily due to client expectations, suppliers and distributers. However, not everyone delivered scenery to prominent New York or London venues.
There was a whole other world where skilled scenic artists in distant locals used a variety of materials. In more rural settings, a wide range of cloth was employed for theatrical scenery, yet the inferior fabric did not detract from the painted illusion.
Here is a detail of extremely thin fabric beneath a distemper painting from the scenic studio of J. M. Deeds in Spokane, Washington, c. 1915.
Delta Fine sheeting beneath a layer of distemper paint. Painting by J. M. Deeds Scenic Studio, Spokane, Washington, USA.
This type of fabric was popular for its versatility under various lighting conditions. For example, it was popular for the revelation of a hidden artifact. The detail below shows a 1915 example of a transparency in the center of a treasure chamber scene at the Masonic Theatre in Grand Forks, North Dakota. This is a 1915 drop manufactured by Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio of Chicago, Illinois.
Fine sheeting (similar to theatrical gauze) used by Sosman & Landis for Masonic scenery in 1915.
Here is another early-20h-century example from a theatre in Quincy, Illinois. This was a 1912 transparent drop (same function as a contemporary scrim) manufactured by Toomey & Volland Scenic Studio of St. Louis, Missouri.
View from behind a transparent drop (left) and painted detail on the front (right). Masonic Theatre by Toomey & Volland Studio, Quincy, Illinois, c. 1912.
And lastly, here is a transparent drop that was produced by Becker Bros. Scenic Studio of Chicago in 1930 for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Moline, Illinois.
View of the auditorium from behind the transparent drop.Front of the same transparent drop painted at Becker Bros. Studio in Chicago, Illinois, for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Moline, Illinois, c. 1930.
Unlike contemporary scenic paint on shark tooth scrim, when holes are filled in the open-weave fabric, it does not destroy the scenic illusion on stage. One could argue that unless the majority of holes in a shark tooth scrim are filled, the entire scene will still successfully function as a transparency on stage.
Here is another view of the same drop from the wings.
Transparent drop produced by Becker Bros. Studio in 1930.
The scenic studios of Sosman & Landis, Toomey & Volland, and Becker Bros. were major theatrical suppliers in large metropolitan areas. In the end, the weight of the fabric was often concealed by the skill of the scenic artist. Using a less-expensive fabric also increased the overall profit margin for many studios. As we learned in the workshop, it paints up quite well.
To cook the rabbit skin glue on the stage, we used a double boiler on a hot pot, placed on a metal table. You can successfully use a variety of appliances that use indirect heat – this is just one method. I have often picked up crockpots to cook glue too.
A side note on selecting animal glue… I personally used a combination of hide glue and technical gelatin (high-clarity). In the past I worked with the chemist at Bjorn Industries . The company offers a variety of hide glue grades, ranging in strength and clarity. Their is also a quaint family-owned aspect to the company, with their products being delivered in a Ziplock bag.
Hide Glue that I use for distemper painting in the US.
For the Distemper painting workshop, we used the following HATO pigments:
Lemon Yellow, Chrome Yellow, Indian Yellow, Raw Sienna, True Orange Medium, True Red Light, Ultramarine Blue, Turquoise Blue, Crystal White.
I selected Indian Yellow for the workshop, as it was the closest to the orange that I use for distemper painting.
And two pigments from Mylands: Burnt Umber and Raw Umber.
The was an incredibly dark brown.
Everything went well, but I really missed my two standard colors: a cool red (one to counter the warm red) and a really dark brown (Van Dyke). Although black was available, I refuse to place that on my scenic art palette (unless it is for a sign painting project). That is a whole other discussion and has to do with stage light.
Fortunately, the Raw Umber was uncharacteristically dark, almost filling the Van Dyke gap. Despite this minor deficit, the projects did not suffer from a lack of color options.
I am also going to address pigment quality and availability. For me, even poor-quality dry pigments are better than pre-mixed scenic paints.
I also consider sustainability when planning a scenic art project. The distemper paint system is a relatively green process with very, very, very little waste. In its dry form, color and hide glue can be stored for decades. Dry pigment paste that dries on a palette, or in a pail, can also be reconstituted, again and again. The only waste is size water that has turned. However, the shelf life of size can be greatly extended if stored in glass, left uncovered, and refrigerated. It can easily keep for up to a month in proper conditions.
I’ll start with a note on the Flints website concerning their Dry Scenic Colors:
Flints have struggled to maintain a regular supply of good quality Dry Powder Pigments so we have now decided to stock this excellent range from Germany. Haussmann have been producing these fine pigments for many years, so we are very confident that we will be able to provide you with a consistent range of excellent quality scenic powder pigments with some really vibrant bright colours plus a good selection of earths. A hand painted colour chart is available for a nominal sum. Please note, the Raw and Burnt Umber pigments are now from an alternate supplier, as Haussmann are no longer able to supply them. We have elected to do this in order to ensure we can supply an adequate range.
It is wonderful that Flints carries dry colors, and there are many pros to using the distemper painting system. Here is a slide that I included in my presentation:
Also, if you are looking for a color that is not carried by a theatrical supplier, check out the fine art world.
This is not a finite list, and dry pigment is available from numerous art stores, including Dick Blick, Jackson’s, Jerry’s Artarama Art Supplies, Etsy, Archsupplies, and more. Dry pigment is far easier to purchase now, and more readily available, than thirty years ago.
Throughout the duration of the Distemper Painting Workshop, the stage lighting proved to be a challenge, in term of both temperature and direction. However, we were able to rearrange the frames and add some lighting booms to resolve some of the issues.
By the end of the first day, we recognized that two rows of projects created very poor lighting conditions in some areas.
The first configuration of project frames.
We opted to have a single row of frames, placed directly between two main light sources hanging above the stage. This provided a general wash that equally illuminated all of the projects. It also allowed students to view their projects from the auditorium.
The second configuration of project frames. This worked beautifully!
Additionally, we placed a sheet of black plastic between the frame projects, blocking light from the other side, as the fabric was so thin. This was Grit Eckert’s idea, as she was reminded of some scenic studios who used black behind the vertical frame when painting transparent scenes.
I want to take a moment to thank Grit for her amazing assistance throughout the entire workshop. She was there to document the process, as well as lending a helping hand whenever needed. It would not have been possible to run this class as smoothly as it went without her assistance.
Grit Eckert helping me cover the ground rows.
My next post will look at seascape projects, and why this type of exercise may be the best introduction to distemper painting.
David Wilmore and I began discussing new ground rows for the Tyne Theatre & Opera House last fall. It was during a stage machinery demonstration that Wilmore mentioned my name; they were ready for new scenery. Before my departure, the following plan was hatched over a pint of beer.
Our plan: I would design and paint eight ground rows with historic pigments in the US and fly them over, packed in my suitcase.
Eight ground rowswere packed a standard suitcase and flown to England on July 25, 2024.
From the beginning, we planned that I would use traditional materials and techniques; painting the ground rows on a vertical frame with distemper paint (pigment paste and diluted hide glue). This is also what made it possible to fold all of the ground rows into a compact little bundle and not worry about creasing.
Containers of dry pigment paste that I used for the ground rows.Control buttons for the motorized paint frame that I used to paint the ground rows.
Initially, I planned to paint eight water rows, each measuring 3’-0”h x 24’-0”w. However, size, construction, and composition were bantered about, and in the end there were four water rows and four ground rows; the new width measuring 26’-6” wide, with heights ranging from 30” to 60″. Furthermore, each ground row would breakdown into three pieces (for easier handling and storage). The design anticipated that certain sections would be removed with additions constructed at a later date.
Once the sizes were finalized, I began to design each row. Using pastels, I completed a few quick sketches to indicate color palette and layout. I really like using pastels to quickly convey an idea, especially when the final scene is paint in distemper.
Two quick sketches in pastels to convey composition and color.
A detailed rendering was my next step, and now we were off to the races!
Final design for water rows.Final design for foliage ground rows.
Using 126”-wide lightweight muslin, I tacked two 27’-6” long swaths of fabric. I have taken to using this particular width as it perfectly fits on the paint frame. This saves me a ton of time in the long run.
Two sized muslin panels attached to paint frame.
I budgeted five days to set-up, paint, tear-down, and pack-up the eight ground rows.
I started with the water rows: three rows on the top panel and one row on the bottom panel. As pictured below, the top fabric would contain the 30”, 40” and 50” high water rows. The bottom panel would contain two 60” ground rows (water and foliage).
Four water rows on the paint frame.
When the water rows were finished, I replaced the top fabric panel (water rows) with a fresh piece of muslin for the foliage rows. I masked the completed water row on the bottom fabric panel with plastic. Sometimes I throw paint a little too freely!
Basing in the ground rows on the third day.
Each set of ground rows took approximately two days, leaving me a little extra time to pre-hang the panels in the nearby theatre and make sure that everything lined up. This also allowed me to double- check that the painted illusion read well from a distance.
Checking ground rows prior to packing.
I was also able to document the viscosity of the painting. Over the years, I have learned to use less, and less, paint. THAT is the key to distemper painting!
It was while documenting historic scenery collections that I began to realize how little paint was applied to the surface of historic drops; and it wasn’t because it had all dusted off. Applying thin coats of paint not only means that every drop can function as a translucency, but also facilities packing for a tour. This was also not the first time that I have packed painted scenery in a standard suitcase, so I knew how much wiggle room that I had to work with!
Painted detail. View from front (left) and back (right).
When packing the ground rows, I simply layered them from widest to narrowest before folding. All eight ground rows easily fit in a suitcase, with room to spare.
Arranging ground rows prior to folding.Eight ground rows packed in a standard suitcase.
Distemper scenes traveled very well, without any horrific wrinkles or creasing. I sometimes think we forget how hearty this type of scenery can be. Only water poses a threat to newly-painted distemper scenes.
Eight ground rows after they were unpacked at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House.
After spending five days in a suitcase, as I journeyed from Minneapolis to London, and then Newcastle-upon-Tyne, they were unfolded at the Tyne on Monday, July 29.
Over the next few days, three of the eight ground rows frames were constructed, so they could be used in the demonstration on Friday, August 2. Only the edges of the fabric were glued to the prototypes (less than an inch). It will be removed and attached to the final version. The final version will have more detailed edges to accentuate the individual leaves.
Covering the ground row frames.Covering the frames.
On Thursday evening, August 1, the ground rows were installed and operated for the first time.
David Wilmore (left) and Colin Hopkins (right) discussing the installation of the first ground row on August 1, 2024. Tyne Theatre & Opera House.Installing the second ground row on August 1, 2024. Tyne Theatre & Opera House.Two of three ground rows in action during the International Theatre Conference on August 2, 2024.Tyne Theatre & Opera House.Two of three ground rows in action during the International Theatre Conference on August 2, 2024.Tyne Theatre & Opera House.The new ground rows with David Wilmore in the background.
Watching this all come together was one of the more exciting moments of my career.
Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Rachel Snape (Heritage and Development Project Manager) watching the ground rows in action for the first time. Photograph by Mike Hume, Historic Theatre Photos.
There is nothing quite like seeing your paintings tucked amongst stage machinery. It was a remarkable experience!
Ground rows tucked in the stage machinery at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House.Colin Hopkins (Project Site Manager and Stage Carpenter).
An image from my article, A Forum for Progress, made the cover of DIE VIERTE WAND #012!
This is my sixth article for the magazine. It examines an 1897 Sosman & Landis stock scenery collection delivered to Forum Hall. Now known as The Forum, the venue is located in the Bronzeville neighborhood of Chicago, an area that later became known as the Black Metropolis.
DIE VIERT WAND is bi-lingual (German and English) publication with articles about theatre submitted by authors worldwide.
I have Chris Van Goethem to thank for my introduction to Stephan Gräbener, editor of the publication. In 2017, Van Goethem shared an email Gräbener, calling for articles:
The Initiative TheaterMuseum Berlin e.V. is planning its next issue of DIE VIERTE WAND.
As usual we’re going to offer articles about all aspects from the world of the theater.
Historical or contemporary, research, science, theory or practical reports.
Whatever you might think of.
The term „theater“ is synonymous for all kinds of performing arts.
My first article, Staging the Scottish Rite: Degree Productions of Freemasonry, was published in DIE VIERTE WAND #007.
I continued to submit articles for the publication over the years:
#008 – Raising Hell on a Masonic Stage
#009 – Brown’s Special System for Scottish Rite Theaters in North America
#010 – American Scenic Art: The Immigrant Contribution
#011 – Sosman & Landis, Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre
In 2019, I was delighted to meet Gräbener in person at Stage|Set|Scene in Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Gräbener at Stage|Set|Scene. Berlin, 2019.
All back issues of DIE VIERTE WAND #001-#011 are still available via the website and the Internet Archive.
You may have noticed that it has been a while since my last post.
When I’m not on the road for work, my life consists of scenery preservation, presentations, master classes, writing, scenic design, art, and caretaking (people, places and things). I wrote a similar statement last year, about the same time.
I just returned from a trip to England and Wales. The impetus for my travel began last fall at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House.
View of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne from my hotel window on July 29, 2024.
The Tyne Theatre & Opera House on July 30, 2024.
The Tyne Theatre & Opera House. Photograph by Mike Hume, August 2, 2024.
Last year, on Sept. 15, 2023, I presented a paper at an international theatre conference. 120 delegates attended the event, representing the UK, Europe, Canada and the United States.
My presentation, Stage Craft and Spectacle: Immigrant Contributions to North American Theatre, was part of the Tyne Theatre & Opera House Conference: Victorian and Edwardian Theatre in Performance, Music & Machinery – Stagecraft & Spectacle. Here is a link to my 2023 presentation from last year:
I was part of a session entitled Beyond Great Britain, one that included Mike Hume and Rick Boychuk. They discussed the Booth Theatre and Auditorium Theatre, respectively. Here is a link to more information about the conferences and individual sessions: https://www.tynetheatreandoperahouse.uk/international-conference/
The 2023 event was organized by David Wilmore of Theatresearch. On the final day of the conference delegates were able to watch the functioning stage machinery from both above and below stage.
David Wilmore explaining the stage machinery to delegates. September 15, 2023.
The 2023 conference was a truly a celebratory event, unveiling almost two decades of hard work to rebuild the entire stage house after a 1985 fire.
The theater’s website explains:
Our machinery is one of the only surviving examples of Victorian wooden modular stage machinery in the UK and is of huge historic importance. Prior to the theatre fire in 1985, the machinery was used regularly by fully trained volunteers in productions. Now however there is a real risk of losing historic knowledge from previous years. We are therefore developing a team of committed volunteers who will be trained in the operation and restoration of this machinery.
At both conference’s Wilmore provided context for the machinery, giving a full explanation of the bridges, cuts, and sloats during various demonstrations.
Sloats emerging from the cuts at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House. Sept. 15, 2023.
During the 2023 demonstration, Wilmore commented that they were ready to install new scenery. Before my departure, the following plan was hatched over a pint of beer.
Our plan: I would design and paint eight ground rows with historic pigments in the US, then hand-carry them in my suitcase.
In addition to delivering the scenery, I would teach a three-day distemper painting class while the scenery was being installed. The project would culminate at the end of the week with another international conference, featuring 19th-century scenic art. The conference would also include a demonstration of the stage machinery, now complete with my scenery attached to frames on the sloats. Less than a year later, we were attaching frames to the sloats, just prior to the conference.
Attaching frames to the sloats on August 1, 2024.
So how did this all come to be?
In the fall of 2023, a survey was sent out to various organizations, inquiring about potential interest in a three-day distemper painting class. There was an overwhelming response, prompting the entire project to move forward.
As dates were finalized for the summer of 2024, a secondary “travel trip” was hatched with Mike Hume (https://www.historictheatrephotos.com/). In 2023, Hume, Boychuk, and I visited fifteen theaters, both before and after the conference. Our travels brought us to historic venues in London, York, Glasgow, Bristol, Bath, and the Isle of Man. In the end, we documented fifteen theaters.
Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Rick Boychuk and Mike Hume at the Theatre Royal in Bath, 2023.
Hume and I planned a similar trip this year, but by car. Our plan was to drive from Newcastle-Upon-Tyne to Craig Y Nos, Wales. The primary focus was historic scenery collections.
Mike’s map for our proposed 2024 theatre tour.
When all was said and done, I visited:
Georgian Theatre Royal, Richmond
Victoria Hall, Settle
The Plaza, Stockport
Buxton Opera House
Chatsworth House Theatre
Theatre Royal, Nottingham
Nottingham Concert Hall
Nottingham Playhouse
Everyman Theatre, Cheltenham
Adelina Patti Theatre, Craig y Nos
Normansfield Theatre, London
Richmond Theatre, London
The Palladium, London
My next several posts will be about the design and painting of the ground rows, my distemper scene painting class at the Tyne, the scenic art conference, and the historic scenery at various venues.
Many of my projects take years to plan and implement. Such was the case with the main drape and valance at the Ruby Theatre in Chelan, Washington.
The drapes were intended to accentuate a newly acquired photo-player. The old ones having fallen into an irreparable state of disrepair.
Proving to be a bit of a diva during installation, theatre owner Larry Hibbard, appropriately named his photo-player Valentina. Photo-players accompanied silent movies with both music and sound effects. By the way, Valentina rises from the original orchestra pit, now hidden below the thrust. Hibbard explained that Valentina demanded this grand entrance after learning about the history of photo players from her big-city cousins .
“Valentina” – the photo-player – on stage at the Ruby Theatre in front of the new draperies.
Here is a link to an interview with Hibbard about his photo-player, named Valentina, for Wenatchee World (January 2021)- “Bringing Back a Piece of History to Chelan’s Ruby Theatre.” https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=416089849649129
Exterior of the Ruby Theatre in Chelan, Washington.
I was first contacted by Hibbard in November 2021. He was interested in replicating the main drape, complete with hand-painted border.
In January 2022, Hibbard shipped half of the main drape to my studio so I could examine the fabric and stencil. The arrival of the curtain at my studio coincided with another Washington State theater event that made national news. On Jan. 27, 2022, CNN reported, “A couple renovating a 115-year-old building discovered two 60-foot-long hidden murals.” The next day I received an email with a link to the article from my Canadian colleague John Madill. Madill was the first of many colleagues to share the online article; all urging me to contact the couple. I was hesistant as my schedule was already booked for the year.
The next day, on Jan. 29, 2022, I received the following FB message:
“Hi, Wendy! My husband and I recently uncovered a 60ft mural from 1915 and are hoping to conserve it. I was wondering if you could offer any advice or expertise as it looks like a theatre backdrop. There are videos and pictures on our Facebook group (mural restoration at the historic Timm building). Thanks so much.”
Great. I decided to see exactly where Okanogan was located. Amazingly, it was less than an hour north of the Ruby Theatre in Chelan, Washington. That was my sign to plan a quick trip.
Here is a map of the area – west of Spokane, Washington.
The Okanogan Murals were located in a building once known as the Hub Theatre.
A small section of the mural, delivered to the Hub Theatre by the J. M. Deeds Scenic Studio of Spokane, Washington.
They were only seen by the public for three years before being encapsulated behind a wall of plaster. In 1918, the building was again renovated, becoming the Paramount Theatre.
The renovated Hub Theatre when it became the Paramount.
I did a little research, and soon discovered that J. M. Deeds Scenic Studio decorated BOTH Okanogan’s Hub Theatre and Chelan’s Ruby Theatre. On Dec. 7, 1915, the Okanogan Independent announced, “Improvements at Hub’s.” The article reported, “Hub Carlton has contracted with J. M. Deeds of Wenatchee for interior decorations, new screen and new curtain for the Hub Theatre that will greatly improve the inside appearance of this popular playhouse. Mr. Deeds came up from Wenatchee last week and is now supervising the work, which is being done by W. J. McConnon, and experienced decorator who has been in Mr. Deeds employ for some time. Mr. Deeds has just completed decorations for the Wenatchee theater, which is said to be one of the finest in this part of the state, and also is the man who did the decorating for the Ruby Theatre of Chelan, known far and near as one of the most attractive playhouses in the country. The new improvements at the Hub include 120 feet of panoramic landscape scenery in light tans. The picture screen will be 11×13 feet in size and have frame effects of moulding. There will also be a pretty drop advertising curtain with an overhead roll, noiseless I operation and will be controlled from the operator’s booth. Mr. Carlton is sparing no means to improve his place of business and is making additions to his equipment as rapidly as business will warrant.”
After a quick visit to meet with both theater owners in Okanogan and Chelan, I was soon back in Okanogan to supervise the removal of both murals from a water-drenched building. As they were created with distemper paint (pigment paste and diluted hide glue), time was of the essence.
Removing the murals at the Old Hub Theatre in Okanogan, Washington.March 2022.
That fall, I again led a crew to clean and stabilize the murals before again placing them back into storage.
The murals hanging in an Okanogan Fairgroundbuilding after Phase 1: cleaning and stabilization. October 2022.
All the while, I remained in contact with Hibbard about the Ruby Theatre project. It took us quite some time to locate a similar fabric. Creating a custom-dye job was not financially feasible, as the project was too small.
In the end we hired Liba Fabrics to manufacture the draperies with a lovely rose-colored fabric that shifted color under light.
They were shipped to the Ruby Theatre during the spring of 2023.
The plain curtains, valance, and side curtains, installed at the Ruby Theatre in 2023.
My trip to paint the draperies was scheduled for spring 2024. Prior to my April departure, I replicated the stencil and completed several samples to look at on site before commencing the project with local assistants. As light altered the fabric to an alarming degree (that was the magic), we wanted to make sure that everything would work with the space.
Here is one of the three-color stencils…
The base color for the stencil.
Detail of the base color. I came up with a technique that made it look like velvet appliqués.
Two types of gold were applied for detail; warm and cool to help it take dimension from a distance.
Two types of gold paint were used for the second stencil.
Although photographs make it difficult to see the gold, it reflects light beautifully – especially in low-light conditions.
Completed stencil.
As anticipated, the “R” stencil would prove to be problematic. Enter, Patrece Canoy-Barrett. She re-stitched the top and flipped a pleat.
On site assistant, Patrece Canoy-Barrett, who re-stitched the pleats to make the “R” hang flat.
Addition highlight to “R” so it would “pop.”The seam disappears from a distance.
Completed stencil with Valentina, after painting the proscenium arch .Thrust lights are only used when Valentina emerges from the pit.
During my time on site, we also moved a drop curtain from the local museum back to the Ruby Theatre. I really wanted Hibbard to see how a painted element shifted the space. It was so successful that an event was planned to feature Valentina and the historic ad drop. The drop has since been returned to the Museum where it will be on display.
Moving the drop from the Museum to the Ruby Theatre.
Ad drop painted by J. C. Carpenter in 1932 for the Ruby Theatre.
As promised, here is my powerpoint for “Lies and Misrepresentation Behind the Curtain.” This session was sponsored by the Scene Design and Technology Commission for the United States Institute for Theatre Technology’s annual conference in Seattle, Washington.
USITT PRESENTATION (March 22, 2024):
Welcome to “Lies and Misrepresentation Behind the Curtain.” I am Wendy Waszut-Barrett and this is my colleague Ruben Arana.
Before we begin…
This session is divided into two sections. For the first 20 minutes, I will provide historic context and discuss women scenic artists. There will be a 10-minute break to answer questions. Then I will turn it over to Ruben Arana for the second half.
My quest for women scenic artists began in the 1989. In the midst, of learning about theatre history and scene painting techniques, I inquired about the nineteenth-century women scenic artists and was told, “They were all boys, get over it.”
Although our profession is more about what we can do, rather than who we are; this statement made me feel like I was not part of scenic art history. So, I threw myself into learning everything I could about historic scenic art, the people and process.
Who knew that I would discover the name of a woman scenic artist while indexing the diary and scrap book of Thomas Gibbs Moses, a scenic artist whose career spanned from 1873-1934. The project was assigned to me by Lance Brockman, now Professor Emertitis at the University of Minnesota.
My main task was to print up all the pages (feeding quarter after quarter into a microfilm machine), summarize the content of each page, and then create both subject and author indexes.
One of the articles in Moses’ scrap book mentioned “Little Theresa Sparks,” a scenic artist who was employed at a Chicago studio.
You can imagine my delight when I brought this to Lance’s attention. This began the a debate about when women actually entered the field of scenic art.
I tracked down the life and career of Theresa Sparks, posting her story to my blog drypigment.net in 2020. I knew by the 1920s, there was a growing workforce of women scenic artists gaining attention in various publications.
In fact, a 1927 article in The Scenic Artist mentioned the work of twelve women scenic artists, including Lillian Gaertner, Gretl Urbahn, and Vyvyan Donner.
The article included a very subjective analysis, stating:
“For many years women felt themselves barred from taking a part in the painting of scenery, because it involved extreme physical stamina, which, excepting in rare cases, women do not possess. However, being more or less tenacious, it is a foregone conclusion that women will work out theirown salvation, and this will perhaps lie in the line of designing or art directing, rather than the actual painting of scenes.”
And thus continued the myth that women scenic artists were few and far between, having not really contributed before the 1920s.
Here are a few names women scenic artists who worked between the 1860s and 1940s. These were women who painted stage settings and were listed as such in census reports, city directories, and newspaper accounts.
I believe historians try their best to represent the world as it was. However, at some point, the contributions of generations of American theatre artists were left out of theatre history. Aesthetic shifts, new design movements, and innovative technology continue to be credited to a select few.
There is a popular image of twenty-four scenic artists who were early officers and charter members for the Protective Alliance of Scene Painters in America.
This group has been constantly referred to as “the foremost scenic artists and designers” in America at the time. That is simply not the case. There is no doubt that each was a skilled and a relatively successful scenic artist, but this group does not comprise the best that America had to offer at the time. They only represent a small number of scenic artists working in a few specific regions. The picture is very telling, especially when you start realize those nationally-renowned scenic artists missing from the picture.
For me, these men represent those who had the most to lose without establishing a protective alliance and keeping OTHER scenic artists out.
I say this having carefully tracked the lives and careers of these gentlemen, including the Thomas G. Moses.
It was not until 1918 that women were allowed to join the Union. Mabel A. Buell’s late entry makes it appear that women were just beginning to enter the scenic art field.
It’s important to understand that when Mabel joined the Union, she was not only a scenic artist, but also a scenic studio owner. Both she and her mother worked as scenic artists, as did her father and brother. In many cases, it was a family affair.
By the way, this is Mable directing her employees. At times her staff numbered twenty people.
When Mabel joined the Union, she was described as the “only girl in the profession.” Buell continued to be listed as such in the early 1920s.
By this time GENERATIONS of women had worked as scenic artists. Some were wives, some were daughters, some were sisters, and some entered the profession all on their own.
The use of “ONLY” to describe a female scenic artist in newspapers, sends an underlying message – they are not a threat. After all, there is only one.
Here are examples of three women scenic artists identified as the “Only” in America over the course of two decades; On the left is Grace Wishaar (pronounced Wee-shar), listed as the only woman theatrical scene painter by 1901. On the right is Irene Kendrick, listed as the FIRST woman scene painter in 1909. In the center is Mable Buell – pictured in the 1921.
I am going to focus on Seattle Scenic artist – Grace Norton Wishaar- she is pictures on the left.
Born in 1876, she worked at both the Cordray Theatre and the Seattle Theatre in the early 1890s. An accomplished pianist, singer, and chess player, she was the eldest of 6 children born to Emile Bernard and Marie Ida Smith. When Grace was ten years old, she sailed with her family from New York to California.
Her career as an artist began at the San José Art School, with her first drawing instructor being Lee Lash. Lash was eight years older than Grace, and moved to New York where he established a scenic studio. Ironically, when Grace moved to New York looking for work, Lash turned her down, explaining: “scene painting was no work for a woman; her sex would make her unwelcome among the workmen’ and that women were too ‘finicky’ for work that demands broad effects.”
In 1894, The Washington Standard reported, “Seattle has a young lady scene painter in Miss Grace Wishaar. A new drop curtain at Cordray’s, which is universally admired, is from her brush.”
Grace had painted scenery for almost two years by this point.
In fact, the same year that Grace entered the scenic art profession, Sosman & Landis sent Thomas G. Moses to Seattle for several months to deliver a massive stock scenery collection. The studio frequently hired local artists to help with on-site work.
In 1901 Grace described her early career in an interview with a Buffalo Express reporter. She said:
“It was like this, I left school out in Seattle and went into society. But my sister cared for music, and I cared for art, and we tired of other things and decided to study. She began training her voice for grand opera. I fitted up a studio – a beautiful room it was, 80 feet long, in the Seattle business block – I kept at portrait work. My mother writes – she lately copyrighted a play on the Philippine war – so she understood how we felt. Then one day the Seattle Theater needed a drop. My father, E. B. Wishaar, is dramatic editor of the Post-Intelligence -sir. He heard about it and mentioned it to me. I thought I could do the drop. Mr. Russell – the manager – laughed at me, but he let me try it. I painted the scene and they said it was just what they wanted. After that, I had all I could do for the Seattle and Cordray theaters and for two years I worked as a professional…”
In the midst of all of this, Grace married her first husband in 1897, celebrated the birth of a son in 1898, and continued her artistic training at the William M. Chase School of Art – moving east in 1900.
When Grace headed to New York in search of scenic work at the beginning of 1901 -it was scenic studio owner D. Frank Dodge who provided an opportunity. Soon, she was painting for him at the Fifth Avenue Theatre, Manhattan Theatre, and Herald Square Theatre.
During the next few years, Grace became Dodge’s right-hand person – meeting with newspapers and explaining both the design and painting process. She continued with Dodge until 1904 when he sent to a project in Seattle. She remained there, painting at theaters in Portland, Seattle, Tacoma, San Francisco, and Oakland. While working for Dodge she married her second husband.
When Grace returned to the West Coast, she worked with Seattle scenic artist, Sheridan L. Jenkins. Photographs of the two working together in 1905 are priceless.
Sheridan was originally from Fairbury, Nebraska. He moved to Seattle by the late 1880s and began working as a scenic artist. In 1892 when, about the time Grace entered the profession, he moved to Chicago, working with Thomas G. Moses’ former business partner, Walter Burridge.
Here is another photograph of Grace and Sheridan on the paint bridge. From a quality standpoint, these are some of the best scenic art process photographs that I have ever encountered.
Here is another of the two in Grace’s studio. We are able to see – in detail – so many of her designs and models.
All of their stage scenery was painted with distemper paint, the mixture of pigment paste with diluted hide glue. By the way, I have solely used distemper paint for the last seven shows I that designed and painted for Haymarket Opera Company (Chicago) and the Gilbert & Sullivan Very Light Opera Company (Minneapolis). It reflects light so much better than any premixed product in a can. In 1903, Grace explained “Distemper is a really beautiful medium. You can produce such fine effects with it! But it’s very tricky unless you know JUST how to handle it.”
In 1904, Harry W. Bishop hired Grace as his scenic artist for Ye Liberty Playhouse in Oakland, California. The theater’s studio measured 100 by 35 feet, and included a machine shop and three paint frames. One frame was movable, and the other two were stationary with adjustable bridges. It was a remarkable stage, with a 75-foot revolve – purportedly the first in the west. Grace was working at a state-of-the-art theater.
Her scenic art at Ye Liberty immediately made the news and was described as “one of the strong points of the theater.” Grace’s gender was looked upon as an asset. On Jan. 12, 1905, The Berkley Gazette reported, “The Liberty is particularly fortunate in this [meaning her being female], for that is the secret of the delicate touches, artistic settings and finished details always present at their performances.”
In 1907, another article about Grace announced, “Ye Liberty’s Scene Painted, the only woman in the world of the profession – does amount of work which men scene painters find impossible to do.” Remember that two decades later, the 1927 article in The Scenic Artist reported, “For many years women felt themselves barred from taking a part in the painting of scenery because it involved extreme physical stamina.”
Progress made by one generation of women, can instantaneously evaporate with the next.
Wishaar’s scenery for Barbara Freitchie at Ye Liberty Playhouse was regarded “as proof of Miss Grace Wishaar’s uniformly good scene painting.” Here is an image of her Frederick Street setting for the show.
While working for Bishop, three major disasters struck: earthquake, divorce, and fire. In 1906, an earthquake damaged Ye Liberty Playhouse. This was the same year that she married her third husband. The next year, Grace filed for divorce, citing desertion.
In 1909, Grace and her family narrowly escaped a house fire. Evidence suggested that a faulty grate was to blame, but the fire destroyed everything, including her prized collection of paintings. This was a turning point for Grace. She collapsed at work. Her doctor advised a “rest cure.” This was the medical order for “go on a world tour.”
Enter Marian Smith Oliver, former ward of multimillionaire F. M. Smith, also known as the Borax King. In 1910, Grace and Marian journeyed around the world, ending up in Paris where Grace set up a studio and Marian began performing. Scandal ensued, with Marian returning home to her husband. Their marriage did not last. In 1912 Seattle newspapers reported that Grace was in the midst of a three-years art course in Paris and “At present she is on a summer sketching tour through Spain and Italy.” She participated in several art exhibitions, and in 1914 exhibited three portraits at the Salon des Beaux Arts.
Grace had played chess since a child and used it to relax during paint breaks at the theater. In Paris, Grace began competing in chess tournaments. In 1931, she won the French Woman’s Championship, the same year that her fifth husband completed suicide in Ceylon (Sri Lanka).
Grace’s sixth and final marriage was to world-chess champion, Alexander Alekhine (1892-1946). She was playing one of the boards in his simultaneous blindfold chess game. They were in Tokyo. They married the next year. Sixteen years her junior, Alekhine was a notorious alcoholic, The two traveled, played chess, and won awards, yet she continued to paint and maintain a studio in Paris.
When Grace passed away in 1956, she was buried next to her husband. Their gravestone even includes a chess board at its base. There is much, much, more to this story that is posted to www.drypigment.net.
The chess world has recently become fascinated with Grace Wishaar. Last year, Alan McGowan, historian at Chess Scotland, contacted me about my posts concerning her early life and painting career. In January 2024, McGowan published his article, “Amazing Grace,” for the English periodical Chess.
Grace left a treasure trove of photographs, newspaper articles and other historic records, yet, she still faded from theatre history by the 1920s. There are still hundreds who remain nameless; their contributions to the development of theatre history have yet to be counted.
Over the past few years, I have identified dozens of women scenic artists while writing the 120 biographies of Soman & Landis studios, including Grace Wishaar. This research is for my upcoming book Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. The Sosman & Landis staff was quite diverse, including women, African-Americans, and immigrants.
Which brings me to Lara Levero. She represents the thousands who did not make headlines, appearing as a brief spark at a particular moment. In 1920, Levero was counted in the US Federal Census, living in Los Angeles and working as a scenery painter. She listed her birthplace as Mexico and Spanish for her “mother tongue.” Levero emigrated in 1918 and was currently living with fellow scenery painter Felix Garcia.
I have managed to track the scenic art career of Felix Garcia, who settled in El Paso, Texas, and was listed in city directories by 1922. At this time, I have yet to determine if the two married, or went their separate ways. It is so very difficult to trace the lives and careers of women, especially after they marry.
Today, online databases provide massive amounts of information. We are now able to identify thousands of individuals whose contributions to theatre history were either forgotten or ignored.
Although women scenic artists are not currently included in the history books, they were present and contributed to our industry.
WE can no longer solely teach theatre history from the same books that have been used for generations of students. Teachers cannot teach what they do not learn.
WE are completely in control when choosing the lens through which we depict our industry’s past, present, and future of our industry.
The United States Institute for Theatre Technology is a membership organization, established in 1960 to advance both knowledge and skills in the areas of design, technology, and production. There are several commissions within USITT that focus on specific areas of the industry, such as scene design and technology, costumes, lighting, sound design, education, engineering, and management. Each commission meets at the annual conference to propose sessions and workshops for the next year. The Scene Design and Technology Commission includes scenic art, properties, safety and health, heritage and more.
A few years back, I was appointed Vice-Commissioner of Heritage in the Scene Design Commission, replacing Arden Weaver when he stepped down from the position.
The 2024 conference is in Seattle, Washington (March 20-23). I am one of two presenters for Lies and Misrepresentation Behind the Curtain, a 60-minute session sponsored by the Scene Design and Technology Commission.
Our session is in room 608 at the Seattle Convention Center on Friday, March 22, 2024 (10:00 AM – 11:00 AM). My co-presenter is Ruben Arana of Florida A&M University. We proposed this session last year after meeting meeting for the first time; sitting next to one another at the the Commission meeting.
Our session looks at the history of underrepresented people of color and women in the 19th and early 20th century, sharing the stories of four specific individuals. If you are attending the conference this year, please consider joining us!
For more information about the United States Institute for Theatre Technology, visit www.usitt.org
In 1905, Hugh Lanning painted an advertising curtain and stock scenery for the Blakesburg Opera House. Donated by Mr. and Mrs. Edward Fritz of Blakesburg, Iowa, it is currently on display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.
1905 Ad drop by Hugh Lanning on display the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana. The top and side of the drop are folded over, so you cannot see the entire composition.
Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.
Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.
Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.
Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.
Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.
Lanning exemplifies the skilled scenic artist who diversified his work and never strayed far from home. He was born, raised, and died in Wapello County, Iowa.
Map showing Wapello County in relation to Omaha, Chicago, and Kansas City.
Map of Wapello County. Note that Blakesburg is on the western border.
For a brief time, Lanning was the area’s leading landscape and sign painter, dabbling in a variety of other artistic endeavors that included scene painting, side-show banners, and the decoration of mechanical equipment.
Suffering from a series of hardships, Lanning left only a modest legacy. It is remarkable that any of his artworks survive. Like many Midwestern artists, Lanning’s contributions quickly faded from theatre history.
It is only fitting that Lanning’s work is now on display at the Theatre Museum. He represents the thousands of scenic artists who never moved to a large city, rubbed elbows with theatrical elites, or made the “big time.” It certainly wasn’t because he lacked skills or ambition. In fact, Lanning reminds me of some advice passed down on my mom’s side of the family. Growing up, I was repeatedly told, “There are at least 10,000 people as talented as you; they just didn’t have the same opportunities.” Over the years, this helped place my own work and life in perspective, making me appreciate those who contributed to theatre history, yet were never counted. Maybe that is why I am trying so hard to tell the stories of those who shaped the world of scenic art but are long forgotten.
Lanning leaves a legacy that encapsulates the careers of many rural scenic artists in the Midwestern United States. Those who gave so much to local communities and left life with very little fanfare.
Surprisingly, 43 years after Lanning’s passing, his advertising curtain was displayed at the Kennedy Center during a bicentennial exposition that celebrated two-hundred years of performing arts in America. In 1975, the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana loaned Lanning’s ad drop to be part of “America on Stage: 200 Years of the Performing Arts.” The year-long exhibition was free and open to the public every day from morning to night. Located on the Kennedy Center’s roof-terrace level, scenery, costumes, props, and other memorabilia were placed on display, borrowed from individuals and institutions all over the country. The primary focus of the exhibit was the evolution of American drama, music and dance from colonial times until the 1970s. If anyone attended this event and has documents to share, I would love to include them in this post.
The Kennedy Center exhibition was described by a visitor the “This ‘N That” section of The Bayard News. On March 25, 1976, an article reported, “Visited the bicentennial exhibit on the top floor of the Kennedy Center. Had heard it plugged on IEBN by Helen Hays. It is a review of entertainment in America. There was a Chautauqua tent in which you could see films on various subjects. There was a café-type setting with a Wurlitzer juke box. Hated to leave there for the juke box had records of my era…In a section devoted to traveling tent show, the famous Toby shows of the Schaeffers were prominent. The original family were great friends of Grace and Ralph Chapman and I’ve heard them talk about them…One wall displayed a very large stage curtain, it was full of ads advertising businesses in Ottumwa. Remember those things, painted in the most brazen colors, you could study them until the curtain was raised for the big show” (p. 2). They were describing Lanning’s ad drop. In many ways, he represents the 99% of scenic artists who never gained national reputations.
Here is the story of Hugh I. Lanning (1853-1933), Stage and Side Show Painter of Ottumwa, Iowa.
Signature on Blakesburg Opera House Ad Drop.
Signature and date on Blakesburg Opera House.
Lanning’s family tree is bit complicated due to his father’s multiple marriages and offspring. So many young women died in childbirth in the mid-nineteenth century, leaving grieving husbands with small children.
Hugh Lanning was the one of two children born to David Cornelius Lanning (1826-1907) and Nancy Connelly (1831-1862). Nancy was David’s second wife. The couple was married on Sept. 4, 1850, in Wapello County, Iowa. This was almost three years after the passing of David’s first wife, Amelia Ann O’Neil Lanning (1820-1847). David’s first marriage took place in Ripley, Illinois, on Sept. 12, 1844.
The 1850 Census report listed David and his second wife, Nancy, living with two children from David’s first marriage: Sarah Agnes Lanning (1845-1927) and David Columbus Lanning (1847-1913). That year, the Lanning family lived in Ripley, Brown County, Illinois. Interestingly, Nancy was counted twice in the census. She was also listed as part of her parents’ home in Wapello County, Iowa (Hugh & Martha Connelly).
Hugh Lanning was born on April 27, 1853, in Agency Township, Iowa, with his birth registered in Wapello County. Lanning’s younger sister, Mary Alice Lanning was born the following year.
The 1856 Iowa State Census listed the Lanning family living approximately ten miles southeast of Ottumwa, still in Agency Township. The Lanning household included David, Nancy, Sarah A., Hugh, and Martha. In both the 1850 and 1856 census reports, David Lanning was listed as a cooper.
I was surprised to see that David Jr. was not listed as part of the household. It is possible, that he had already been “hired out”; such was the case with my maternal grandfather at the turn-of-the-twentieth century. As soon as a child was old enough to work, they were hired out to another family with their subsequent “wages” sent home. This is basically leasing a child.
The Lanning family began to financially fail by the late 1850s. On Dec. 8, 1859, David Lanning was listed in the Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier as delinquent in his taxes for three lots in Agency City (p. 2).
I have yet to locate any listing for the Lanning family in the 1860 US Federal Census. However, David and Nancy Lanning celebrated the birth of their third child that year. Emma J. Lanning was born in Ohio. I am uncertain as to whether the Lannings temporarily relocated to Ohio, or were visiting when Emma was born. When Nancy Lanning passed away on Feb. 20, 1862, however, the Lannings were again living in Wapello County.
David remarried his third wife, Harriett Elizabeth Criswell/Creswell (1842-1872) on December 3, 1862. The couple celebrated the birth of Mary Ella Lanning (1863-1920), James Lanning (1865-1921), and William Robert Lanning (1869-1918).
I have yet to track down the Lanning family in the 1860 Census, however, David and Harriet celebrated the birth of Emma J. Lanning in Ohio that year. The Lanning family may have temporarily moved back east. They were back in Iowa by the onset of the Civil War. In 1862, David Lanning was listed as a person subject to military duty in Iowa Records. I have yet to uncover anything about the Lanning family’s activities during the remainder of the 1860s, however, the were still in Wapello county in 1870.
The 1870 US Federal Census listed the Lanning family living in Center Township, Wapello County, Iowa. In 1878, David Lanning was listed as a farmer in “History of Wapello County. He owned Sec. 27 in Agency Township.” James Lanning, also listed as a farmer in 1878, owned Sec. 30 in Agency Township. That year, B. F. Watson was listed as a local painter. It is possible that Lanning apprenticed with Watson. At 38 yrs. old, David Lanning was now employed as a carpenter, with 17-yrs.-old Hugh listed as a laborer. Other members of the Lanning household in 1870 included Hugh’s step-mother Harriet (27 yrs.), Emma J. (10 yrs.), Mary E. (7 yrs.), James (4 yrs.), and Willie (1 yr.). By this time, Lanning’s two oldest children had already married. Sarah A. Lanning was living in Macon, Illinois with her husband, Joseph Fry, and 2-yrs.-old daughter, Elda. David Lanning Jr. was also living in Illinois, recently married to Eliza Mryess.
It is a complicated genealogy, with David Lanning purportedly marrying two more times after the passing of his third wife; L. C. Royce on Dec. 29, 1880, and Sarah Wertz on July 15, 1886. Both marriages were in Wapello County.
I have yet to identify when Hugh Lanning began his work as a painter or attempted his first theatrical project. The 1870s were certainly a decade a transition as he left his parents home, married and celebrated the birth of his first child. Hugh married Josephine “Josie” Rush (b. 1855) in Brown, Illinois, in 1876. Over the years, the couple celebrated the birth of three children:
Hugh Antonio “Tony” Lanning (1877-1947)
David Nelson Lanning (1881-1958)
Fanchon Lanning (1886-1968)
In 1878, their home was destroyed by a tornado. At the time, the Lanning family was living northeast of Ottumwa in Dahlonega township. This community had formerly been known as Shellbark. In 1856 the town boasted three hundred residents, with two packing houses, schoolhouse, public hall, and numerous businesses.
On June 6, 1878, the Buffalo Courier Express described a tornado’s deadly path that destroyed Lanning’s home:
”Still Another. A Destructive Tornado in Iowa the Day After One in Missouri.
Ottumwa, Iowa, June 3, – A terrible tornado took place here on yesterday, about 4 o’clock P. M., originating about two miles north of the city, striking city limits on the north and northeast, and thence passing in a southeasterly direction between Eldon and Batavia, avoiding Agency City…Thence the storm passed to the frame house of Hugh Lanning, a painter, one mile and a half further on. Mr. Lanning and his wife were not in the house and thus saved their lives, as their house, a frame cottage, was torn to pieces, scattering their earthly possessions, and carrying pieces of the timber and small pieces of the furniture ten miles beyond…”
On June 6, 1878, The Oskaloosa Herald reported, “The residence of Hugh Lanning was picked up from the foundation turned around three or four times and crushed like an eggshell on the ground, Of the contents of the house only three or four chairs have been found unbroken. No one luckily was at home” (p. 3).
Lanning remained in the area, but the process of rebuilding one’s home meant that Lanning did not stray far from the area. The 1880 US Federal Census still listing the Lanning home in Dahlonega with Hugh working as a painter. His employment as a scenic artist did not make news until 1882 when he painted some circus banners. On Aug. 6, 1882, the Ottumwa Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning has some fine specimens of scene painting in his shop, nearly completed, for Batcheller & Doris’ show. The painting is first class, and a decided credit to Mr. Lanning” (p. 4). That year, Batcheller & Doris were travelling with their “Great Inter-Ocean Show.” On Aug. 16, 1882, The Columbus Journal (Nebraska) reported, “Batcheller & Doric have, without question, the finest circus that ever visited Burlington, and have more real attractions than any other circus on the road; chief among which is Millie Christian, the two0headed girl, who can truthfully be called the eighth wonder of then world” (p. 3). That summer, Batcheller & Doris’ show included several stops in Iowa, also making news upriver in Oskaloosa.
The show was also advertised as Batcheller & Doris’ Mammoth Aggregation. On August 11, 1882, Nebraska’s Lincoln Journal Star described, “Batcheller & Doris’ Mammoth Aggregation is in reality the combination of a half dozen shows…there is no circus now in the world that presents such varied and first-class ring performance, every artist being bright and particular star in his or her line of business, and commanding salaries that twenty years ago would have been deemed fabulous” (p. 2). 1882 feature acts included: Mlle. Rosina Dubsky, the Hungarian equestrienne; Miss Lizzie Keyes, the American rider; Aberlando Dowanda, the Brazillian equestrian; Willie Shanles, champion hurdle rider; the three Russian Athletes, acrobatics; Milo Brothers, gymnasts; Mlle. Eltre, contortionist; Mlle. Adele, trapeze artist; Prince Salsuma, balancing act; and Prof. Parker, dog act. The circus traveled all over the country between 1881 and 1882. On Jun 5, 1882, The Times of Streator, Illinois, reported, “There are 260 persons on the payroll of the Batcheller & Doris Co.” (p. 4).
Lanning continued to pick up a variety of work. He also became known for his easel art. That fall, Lanning exhibited some of his artworks at the 1882 Agricultural Fair in Agency City. The fairgrounds were within one block of the depot. Lanning was one of the listed attractions. On Oct. 4, 1882, the Ottumwa Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning has staked his tent, in which he has a fine art museum, exhibiting many fine specimens of the art of painting, of which Mr. Lanning is one of the most proficient in this country” (p. 4). On Oct. 5, 1882, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “Hugh Lanning has an art gallery that is really worth going to see, and when you are down there go and see his pictures. There is much to admire and nothing to offend” (p. 4).
Lanning’s work extended to panorama exhibits for local events that included a Turner’s Fair. On Jan. 21, 1885, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “One of the attractions of the evening was the panorama which Mr. Hugh Lanning had kindly put in position for the occasion. His Punch and Judy performance also furnished an unlimited amount of merriment for the many children present” (p. 3).
Tragically, Lannings sister at this same time, with news reaching Ottumwans on Jan. 28. The Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “Miss Mattie Lanning, now Mrs. Lee Traul, dies of consumption on Jan. 20 in Macon, Illinois” (p. 3). This was Martha Alice Lanning, Hugh’s younger sister.
By the end of the 1880s, Hugh Lanning moved his family to Ottumwa where he established a scenic studio on the south side of town. His two sons would follow in his footsteps, working at his shop. On 20 Jun 1888, the Ottumwa Weekly Democrat reported, “During a visit to the South Side yesterday a reporter called at the studio of the scenic artist Hugh Lanning, and found this favorite of Ottumwa art lovers hard at work on a number of landscape scenes ordered from different parts of the country, six of which go to Red Oak, and all gems of their kind. He also has on hand commenced an immense sign for the Golden Eagle clothing house which will be one of the finest signs in Iowa. Mr. Lanning is decidedly the finest scenic artist that ever came to our city and deserves to be liberally patronized” (p. 3)
The next year, Lanning’s artistic diversity was advertised in local news. On May 14, 1889, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning, the painter, does frescoing, sign painting, wood engraving. Scene-painting, etc. Mr. Lanning did the scene work in the Turner opera house, and there is no better artist in Iowa. We understand he will be a bidder for the scene work in the new opera house to be built in this city, and we trust he will secure the contract. If you want any painting done, give Mr. Lanning a call” (p. 3). Like many scenic artists at this time, the key to success was a willingness to paint whatever project came your way. In the case of Lanning, it was a combination of touring show scenery, local signage, residential decoration, and easel art. The wood engraving was unique, but not a surprise when considering his father’s carpentry work.
Lanning’s business was thriving at the turn-of-the-twentieth century. He was listed as one of many business owners involved with the Ottumwa Street Carnival in 1900 (Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier 23 Aug 1900, p. 4). By now, Lanning’s two sons were working alongside him, also employed as painters, and living at 907 Church Street. Hugh’s wife was also listed as a dressmaker in the 1901 Ottumwa Directory. The whole family seemed to be gainfully employed and succeeding.
As with many scenic artists at this time Lanning embraced new technology, investing in new forms of entertainment. He began with stereopticon shows, even touring nearby small towns with his act. On Jan. 2, 1902, the Ottumwa Semi Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning gave a stereopticon show at Bear Creek Monday” (p. 8). Lanning provided a similar entertainment for members of Ottumwa’s Carpenters Union, No, 767. On Jan. 14, 1902, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “The evening’s program was furnished by High Lanning and consisted of moving pictures and gramophone music, or unusual merit and much was appreciated by all” (p. 4). On March 19, 9102,the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning gave an entertainment last evening at the Woodmen of the World hall, which was well attended. The entertainment was given under the auspices of the Northwestern Fraternal Reserve” (p. 4). That spring, Lanning also took his entertainment on the road to. On March 26,1902, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning and the Stoops brothers left this morning for Moravia where they will give a moving picture and gramophone entertainment this evening. Before returning to Ottumwa they will give entertainments at Centerville, Mystic, Blakesburg and other points and expect to be gone about two weeks” (p. 4).
Just when the sky seemed the limit for Lanning, tragedy struck when Josie Lanning fell. She never fully recovered from the incident, and her health continued to decline. On May 6, 1903, the Ottumwa Daily Courier announced, “Mrs. Hugh Lanning is very ill at her home, 907 Church St.” On May 27, 1904, the Ottumwa Evening Democrat announced, “Mrs. Hugh Lanning is dangerously ill at her home on Church Street as the result of a fall she sustained some time ago” (p. 2). She passed away the next year. On June 17, 1905, Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier “Death of Mrs. Lanning. After a lingering illness, death came to Mrs. Josie Lanning, wife of Hugh Lanning, this morning at 12:20 o’clock at the family residence, 907 Church Street. The deceased is survived by her husband, two sons, H. A. Lanning and N. D. Lanning, and one daughter” (p. 4).
This was the same year that Hugh Lanning painted an advertising and stock scenery collection for the Blakesburg Opera House. In fact, Lanning was working at the Blakesburg Opera House when his daughter visited that fall. On Sept. 19, 1905, the Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier, announced, “Miss Fanchon Lanning, 907 Church Street, left on the Milwaukee this morning for Blakesburg, where she will visit her father Hugh Lanning” (p. 8).
For the next few years, Lanning drifted along, varying his work and seldom making news. It was as if his heart was no longer in the game.
On May 9, 1907, The Oskaloosa Herald reported, “Painting the Summer Cars.
The summer equipment of the Traction & Light Co. is being rapidly repainted and overhauled in every way. The work is being done by Hugh Lanning, an expert painter from Ottumwa, and some of his decorations on the cars, which are all hand work, are quite handsome. The cars will be put to use as soon as the work is completed” (p. 7). Lanning briefly relocated to Center, Iowa, where he worked as a sign painter. The 1910 US Federal Census listed that he was still living with his 23 yrs. old daughter that year. He returned to Ottumwa by 1912, where he was listed in the “Painters and Paperhangers” section of the City Directory, still working as a sign painter and now living at 524 Church.”
Over the next few years, Lanning’s named popped up here and there without much fanfare. One 1914 notice announced that he was selected was selected for jury duty. Another indicated his association with the Socialist party. The direction of Lanning’s painting projects during this time shifted toward residential decor. On Feb. 18, 1915, the Ottumwa Tri-Weekly Courier announced, “Hon. P. G. Ballingall has erected on top of his five-cent lunch house, a panoramic view that is immense. He must have got his idea for it in some oriental country during his trips around the world. Like the woman’s calico dress it must have been ‘pretty costive’ Hugh Lanning was the artist who executed it” (p. 2). This is the last article that I have located about Lanning’s work. What once seemed a promising career simply faded away after World War I.
By 1920, Lanning was living with his daughter, Fanchon, son-in-law, Ed Schworm, and granddaughters, Patricia Ann and Betty. He remained at the Schworm home there until his passing. His last work as a scene and sign painter purportedly occurred in 1931.
Lanning passed away on Sept. 8, 1933. The cause of his death was listed as myocarditis; senility was considered a contributing cause.
Lanning’s obituary was published in the Ottumwa Courier on Sept. 9, 1933:
“Hugh Lanning, Sr., 80 years old, died at 401 McKinley avenue at 6 p.m. Friday. He was born in Agency township, the son of David and Nancy Lanning, April 27, 1853. In 1876 he was married to Josephine Rush. She preceded him in death in 1905. Since that time he has made his home with his daughter, Mrs. Ed M. Schworm. For many years, Mr. Lanning was a leading landscape and sign painter here. He has lived practically all his life in Ottumwa. Surviving are two sons, H.A. Lanning of Battle Creek, Mich., and N.D. Lanning of Chicago; one daughter, Mrs. Schworm of Ottumwa; three grandsons, five granddaughters and one great-grandson. Funeral services will be held Monday at 2 p.m. at the Schworm residence. The Rev. O.B. Preston, pastor of the Plymouth Congregational church will officiate. Burial will be in Shaul cemetery. The body was removed to the Johnson funeral chapel and will be returned to the home, Monday morning.”
The oldest scenery collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana was painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.
Two shutter covers painted by Harry Dressel in 1875 for Steyer’s Opera House, Decorah, Iowa. They are now part of the Harry Dressel Collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.
Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.
Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.
Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.
Painted detail from SR shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.
I examined two cottage shutter covers during my visit last month. They were once part of a stock scenery collection at Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa. The scenery was donated through the efforts of Dr. George D. Glenn and Richard Poole, authors of “The Opera Houses of Iowa.” Theatre Museum records indicate that some of the Steyer’s Opera House scenery was placed on display in 2001. When I visited the museum in 2017, the cottage shutters were still on display.
SL shutter coveron display at the Theatre Museum in 2017.
In 1989, Glenn even made a 12 ½ minute documentary about the extant scenery, lighting, and stage machinery, entitled “Steyer’s Opera House.” Here is the YouTube link to the 1989 video: https://youtu.be/r_2l6pGmp3A?si=31RV5ShRr2lSka_w
In 1989 the third-floor opera house was an 1875 time-capsule of stage technology. At the time, it was possibly the oldest extant stage boasting an original 1875 scenery and stage machinery installation in North America.
Image from George Glenn’s 1989 movie that shows the state of Steyer’s Opera House when he first visited the stage.
As is the case with many historic stages, new building owners, investors, and other stakeholders fail to understand the significance of what they have, especially stage artifacts. Fortunately, some of the scenes were transported to the Theatre Museum.
I know of only one older scenic piece in North America – a front curtain painted by Russell Smith for the Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina (1858).
1858 Front curtain by Russell Smith on display in the Thalian Hall lobby in Wilmington, North Carolina in 2019.
Painted detail, 1858 Thalian Hall front curtain by Russell Smith. Wilmington, North Carolina.
Painted detail, 1858 Thalian Hall front curtain by Russell Smith. Wilmington, North Carolina.
To my knowledge, the Steyer’s Opera House contained the oldest collection of stage scenery, machinery, lighting equipment, “as delivered” until the 21st century. It still signifies some of the the oldest examples of signed American scenic art.
Signature on the front of Steyer’s Opera House SR Cottage shutter.
The second oldest examples are 1888 wing-and-shutter scenery signed by Frank Cox for the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. Amazingly, Dressel signed the front of the shutters. Cox signed the back.
Frank Cox signature. Tree profile at the Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.
The Theatre Museum’s Dressel collection signifies the oldest extant example of stock scenery delivered to an American opera house. In addition to age, the creator of Steyer’s Opera House scenery was internationally recognized as an extremely skilled scenic artist. Dressel’s scenic art made news from Toronto to New Orleans in the nineteenth century.
Here is the tale of Henry “Harry” Dressel.
Henry Dressel was the fifth child born to F. Ludwig “Louis” Dressel (1817-) and Sophie Schmidt (1820-1899) in Hanover, Germany. In 1858, the Dressel family boarded a ship in Bremen and sailed for America. On Oct. 22, 1858, they arrived in Philadelphia aboard the Brig Amazone. The ship’s manifest listing Ludwig Dressel (40 yrs. cooper), Sophie (38 yrs.), Marie (15 yrs.), Christian (13 yrs.), George (9 yrs.), William (7 ½ yrs.), Henry (6 yrs.), Louise (5 yrs.), and Adolph (3 mths.).
Ship’s manifest with the Dressel family’s arrival in Philadelphia. Oct. 22, 1858.
The family soon settled in Chicago where Louis Dressel listed his established trade as cooper in the City Directory. Although the family initially lived in a boarding house on Kinzie, they soon secured permanent lodging at 227 N. Franklin. Dressel transitioned from cooper to a rectifier for Theodore Kraefft. Kraefft who not only sold wines and liquors (77 S. Water St.) but also operated a distillery (329 N. Wells St.). Dressel remained with the firm for some time; accepting whatever job came his way, continuing with the firm as it transitioned from Kraefft & Co. to Kraefft, Roelle & Co.
In 1870, the Dressel family were still living at their home on N. Franklin. However, Louis and William were now operating a retail grocery store, Dressel & Son. Meanwhile, Harry Dressel was listed as a fresco painter, boarding at 298 N. Franklin.
While examining the 1870 Census report another name caught me eye – Fest. Living next door to 18 yrs. old Harry was the 19 yrs. old painter Oscar Fest. Fest was only a few months older than Dressel, having been born on Aug. 10, 1852, in Breslau, Germany. Fest and his parents had emigrated in 1853, five years before the Dressels.
In 1870, Fest was also living with his parents on N. Franklin. Both Harry Dressel and Oscar Fest started as decorative painters and later each became incredibly well-known scenic artists; Dressel in New Orleans and Fest in San Francisco. Both of their fathers had worked as coopers. It would have been quite unusual if the two families were not close. It would be uncommon for either Fest or Dressel to have apprenticed as painters after the age of 16. This means that their entrance into the painting profession occurred about 1867. Fest is even listed in the 1867 Chicago Directory a painter.
Both young men may have begun their artistic careers with Robert W. Hanington. Hanington was a wire shade and decorative artist who lived just up the street at 296 N. Franklin. Again, the first listing for Dressel as a fresco painter lists his residence as 298 N. Franklin.
North Franklin street was destroyed by the great fire of 1871. The Dressel family immediately rebuilt their home and continued to live in the area. After all, both their home and grocery business had been in North Franklin when flames swept through in 1871.
Just before the great Chicago Fire of 1871, Dressel began working as a scenic artist for the Globe Theater. Although he was listed in the 1872 Chicago Directory as a fresco painter, he was also listed as scenic artist for Chicago’s Globe Theatre that year.
His link to the Globe was advertised during the tour of Alderson’s Panorama that summer. Newspaper advertisements for the Chicago Fire Panorama listed four contributing artists for the 3,700 sq. ft. painting: one designer and three Chicago-based scenic artists:
Henry Cross of the Academy of Design
J. Howard Rogers, scenic artist of McVicker’s Theatre
Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of Wood’s Museum
Henry Dressel, scenic artist of the Globe Theatre
I believe that Dressel first worked as an assistant to Rogers and Tryon at the Globe Theater when it opened in 1870. The Globe Theatre was initially referred to as the West Side Theatre, with Allen being the first proprietor and lessee of the place (The Chicago Evening Mail 31 Oct. 1870, p. 4). The great fire did not destroy the Globe Theatre, although it came close; crossing the river just a few blocks south. Despite many scenic artist’s losing their homes and employment, those at the Globe were fortunate. It is very likely that the Chicago Fire panorama was painted by Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel at the Globe Theatre.
Map showing the Globe Theatre in relation to the river and burned district.
On Nov. 21, 1870, the Chicago Tribune advertised the opening of “Allen’s Globe Theatre, Des Plaines Street, West side, between Washington and Madison Streets” (p. 4). The announcement credited the Globe’s new scenery and drop curtain to Messrs. James Howard Rogers, John M. Kauffman, and Henry C. Tryon. Kaufmann relocated to Cincinnati by 1874, where he continued working as a scenic artist at local theaters for the remainder of the 19th century.
Portrait of Henry C. Tryonin 1886.
Of this grouping, Roger’s was the premiere artist of the group, with his scenic art solely mentioned in many articles. For example. On Nov. 22, 1870, the Chicago Tribune described, “The decorations of the auditorium are simple, but in great good taste, and the scenic artist, Mr. James Howard Rogers, has put forth his entire artistic skill in getting up the scenes, all of which are of real excellence. In the drop curtain Mr. Rogers has boldly departed from the eternal Lake of Como with its dreadfully Italian sky, etc.; and has drawn his inspiration from home. The picture represents the progress of civilization. It is a beautiful Western scene, composed of lake and mountains, a railroad train – the emblem of advancing civilization – crossing a bridge, and away to the westward, the Indian, with his bow and arrows, receding before it, and following his own setting sun. At the front of the curtain appears the inscription, “Westward the course of empire takes its flight” (p. 4). This article made it seem that Rogers painted everything by himself. Rogers was living in the city, however, as he was listed in the 1870 Chicago Directory: “Howard Rogers, scene painter, r. 34 Price pl.” The listing forgot to include the “J” in front of Howard Rogers.
Rogers maintained a close connection with the Globe, as his wife worked there in 1871. On Feb. 17, 1871, The Chicago Evening Mail announced, “Sick – Mrs. J. Howard Rogers, of Allen’s Globe Theatre, has for the last few days been extremely ill. Until yesterday, it was feared that she would not recover. She is better today” (p. 4).
It is important to remember that scenic art assistants were seldom credited in these theatrical endeavors. When both Tryon and Kauffman were credited, it was as legitimate contributors, not as assistants. Other articles solely credit Rogers as he boasted the biggest reputation at the time. Pot boys or scenic art assistants were never mentioned in metropolitan news.
D. R. Allen’s management of the Globe Theatre was short-lived, ending early in 1871. There were a series of mechanics’ liens against the Globe property, with Col. J. H. Wood listed as proprietor in 1872. On January 25, 1872, the Chicago Tribune even referred to the venue was called Wood’s Globe Theatre, after Colonel Wood’s Museum Company at the Globe (p. 4).
Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel painted Alderson’s Great Panorama of the Chicago fire early in 1872 so it could tour that summer. They worked from primary sketches by Academy of Design instructor, Henry C. Cross.
Their work immediately toured the country, accompanied with musical performances and descriptive recitations. By late July the panorama was exhibited at Piatt’s Music Hall in San Francisco. Several advertisements for the panorama were placed in Figaro. This newsletter referred to itself as “the organ of amusement….circulates in….All the Theatres and is Circulated Every Day in the Year Generally Throughout the City and on the Boats and Cars.” Figaro stated that its newsletter was “published every Day in the Year by J. P. Bogardus at 22 Merchant and 535 Washington Streets, Below Montgomery, San Francisco.”
Advertisement for Alderson’s Panorama in Figaro, 1871.
Another advertisement for Alderson’s Panorama in Figaro, 1871.
The same advertisement was placed in Figaro announcements for several days. The article consistently reported,
“Panorama of the Great Chicago Fire.
Alderson’s Panorama of the Great Chicago Fire has arrived and will be exhibited in Piatt’s Hall on Friday evening next. This painting covers over thirty-seven hundred feet of canvas was executed from actuals views and drawings by Henry C. Cross of the Academy of Design; J. Howard Rogers, scenic artist of McVicker’s Theatre; Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of Wood’s Museum; Henry Dreissel [sic.], scenic artist of the Globe Theatre, and Thomas Megann, scenic artist of Crosby’s Opera House. The mechanical appointments are by the celebrated John Faust of Dearborn Theater and Opera House, all famous artists in their line. The panorama represents Chicago before the fire, the city in flames, and afterwards the ruins. Other sections present views of the old cemetery, with its scenes of suffering representations of the public buildings, printing offices, and water works of prominent places. Succeeding these, are views of the ruins of the churches, the exhibition closing with the ruins of the Masonic Temple by moonlight. A lady of Chicago will deliver a descriptive lecture, interspersed with appropriate ballads, anecdotes, and incidents. This approaches the anniversary of this dreadful event which took place October 8th and 9th, recalls the horrifying scenes to memory, and these will be found faithfully depicted in the great panorama. The process of admission have been fixed at the low rates of 50 cents and 25 cents, and on Sunday afternoon a matinee will be given at half prices.” (Daily Figaro, San Francisco, 31 July 1872, page 1). Some of the advertisements included a listing of various scenes:
“Chicago before the Fire; The Conflagration; Thousands of Houses in Flames; The Scenes of the Old Cemetery; The Ruins; Views of Principal Streets; Public Buildings, Printing Offices, etc.; Ruins of the Churches; Something About Mrs. O’Leary’s Cow; Music, Songs, Stories, Recitations; and Descriptive Lecture and Dramatic Ballad by a Lady of Chicago
Chicago” (Figaro 31 July 1872, p. 1).
One of many articles in Figaro describing the panorama in 1871.
Alderson’s panorama was one of many panorama’s depicting the tragedy that toured in the country at the time. Frank D. Skiff formed, Skiff & Co., to create another panorama of the Chicago Fire. The work was credited as “the work of scenic artist Frank D. Skiff, the well-known scenic artist” (Chicago Tribune 17 Dec 1871, p. 7).
Dressel’s early scenic art career mimics that of many during the early 1870s. Aspiring artists secured work as decorative painters. This employment brought them into director contact with other decorative artists who worked as scenic artists at theaters. In most cases, scenic artists were paid a higher salary, but the work was more sporadic.
Portrait of P. M. Almini
One example of an artist who bridged the decorative and scenic art worlds was Louis Malmsha. Malmsha not only worked for the decorative firm of Jevne & Almini (later known as P. M. Almini & Co.), but also worked at McVicker’s Theatre. Malmsha is the common thread between several scenic artists working in Chicago during the 1870s. For example, both Rogers and Tryon worked with Malmsha at McVicker’s in 1871. This is the year after Rogers and Tryon painted scenery for the Allen’s Globe Theater.
At this time, if a young artist showed promise, he was immediately brought into the theatrical fold. The demand for scenic art was greater than the supply of scenic artists.
Portrait of Thomas G. Moses in 1886.
Thomas G. Moses is another example of a young man who worked as Malmsha’s assistant in 1873, both at Almini’s and McVicker’s in 1873. Both Moses and Tryon ended up as Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio employees by the early 1880s.
When considering Dressel’s entry into the scenic art profession, his initial training was in Chicago before the Great Fire. The 1871 tragedy meant that many scenic artists left the city, as they were left without work. Many, such as Malmsha relocated to other metropolitan areas. There was a waiting period before new stages were constructed for popular entertainment. Others produced painted spectacles that toured, such as the Chicago Fire panoramas. Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel had worked together in the past, and therefore teamed up to paint Cross’ design.
Dressel was touring with the Tannehill Company at the beginning of 1872. He was listed as part of the company, as well at the scenic artist.
I need to provide some context for Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill concerning the time when Dressel joined their troupe. In 1872, they sporadically performed on stages along the eastern seaboard. Their young daughter, Birdie, even joined them on some occasions. On June 13, 1872, The Valley Virginian of Staunton, Virginia, reported:
“AMUSEMENTS. Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill, assisted by their infant daughter, “Birdie,” only five years old, will give one of their chaste, beautiful and intellectual PARLOR ENTERTAINMENTS, at the Town Hall, on Tuesday evening, June 18th. They are well and favourably known and remembered by our citizens, as the leading members of the ‘Old Reliable Company’ when here last Winter. Those who desire to witness a legitimate performance, will be more compensated by attending (p. 3).
Birdie passed away in the spring of 1873.
On March 11, 1873, the “Deaths” section of the Staunton Spectator announced, “At 125, Simcoe Street, Toronto, Canada, on Monday, March 3rd, little Birdie, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill, aged 5 years and 6 months.
Farewell parents, lay me gently
In my little narrow bed.
Think of God who gave and took me;
Now I slumber with the dead,
F. S. M.” (p. 3).
Birdie died from Typhoid Fever in Toronto.
Less than a year later, tragedy struck again in Toronto. This is how I connected scenic artist Harry Dressel with the Tannehill company.
An announcement in The Hamilton Spectator on Feb. 8, 1874, announced:
“FIRE! FIRE! FIRE!
In consequence of the Royal Lyceum, Toronto, burning down, the Company will play a short season at St. James Hall, commencing Monday, Feb 9. The Troupe consisted of the following first-class Artists:
F. A. Tannehill, Manager, Chas. Webster, Wm. Fuller, Wm. Ford, Dick Fowler, Nellie Tannehill, Nellie Stanwood, Mrs. Bradshaw, H. B. Bell, Burton Adams, J. R. Masters, Dick Featherstone, Harry Booth, Harry Dressel, Virginia Buchanan.
Harry Dressel was also listed as scenic artist, with W. Fordham as stage conductor.
The following pieces will be put on stage with new scenery, properties and machinery:
Ticket of Leave Man
Streets of New York
Dora
Colleen Bawn
Pat’s Trouble
Under the Gaslight”
On January 31, 1874, The Hamilton Spectator reported, “The Theater was insured in different offices to the extent of about $12,000, and was owned by Mr. French, by whom it had lately been leased to Mr. Tannehill. This is the third time the building has been attacked by fire, and it has at last succumbed to its assailant. The origin of the fire has not been ascertained, but it is supposed that it commenced in the carpenter’s shop, which being stored with paint, wood, shavings and other flammable material, caused it to spread with such unaccountable rapidity” (p. 2).
I remain unsure as to when Dressel joined the Tannehill company, or how long he toured with the group. I have yet to locate any other articles mentioning Dressel’s scenic prior to the summer of 1875. That year, Harry became the scenic artist for the Varieties Theater in New Orleans, Louisiana. There is no doubt that his association with the Tannehills would have improved his chances in the region. Mr. Tannehill had made quite a name for himself in southern theaters after the Civil War, especially Memphis. Initially, Dressel was hired to both paint and retouch scenery.
On Oct. 31, 1875, The New Orleans Democrat reported, “Amusements. The Varieties Theater. – The amusement season at this favorite theater will be inaugurated to-morrow evening by the first appearance in this city of Grau and Chizzola’s admirable French Opera Bouffe Company in the late operatic novelty of Gorofle-Gizolla. The opera itself is spoken of a Lecocq’s greatest triumph, and the critics of the New York press have been lavish in their praises of its merit. During the summer the theater has been carefully renovated, and Mr. Harry Dressel, and eminent scenic artist, has been busily engaged for some time past in retouching old scenes and painting many entirely new ones, all of which are characterized by beauty of design and delicacy of touch, and color.” (p. 8).
After his initial work at the Varieties Theatre, Dressel headed north and painted stock scenery for Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa. On Dec. 9, 1875, the Chicago Weekly Post and Mail published, “Special Correspondence of THE POST and Mail. Decorah, Iowa, Dec. 3” (p. 3). The article continued:
“Prominent among the improvements is the enlargement of the Steyer Opera House, with a general overhauling, such as reseating with chairs, enlarged gallery, costly and fine scenery (painted by Harry Dressel, formerly of your city), and with a capacity of about 1,100 persons. Rudolph’s Music Hall has also undergone a similar change. About ninety buildings have been erected, among them some fine business blocks and residences, at a cost of over $150,000. Amusements are thick, A panorama ‘busted’ here a few weeks ago, and the operators went back to their legitimate business, and Jo Steyer, of the Opera House, has a ‘show’ on his hands. Plunkett’s troupe played crowded houses for a week recently, presenting ‘Two Orphans.’ Decorah promises to be lively in the way of amusements this winter.”
“Two Orphans” was a popular production in 1875. It was also featured at the Varieties Theatre in New Orleans that year, with Dressel painting the scenes. On Dec. 2, 1875, the New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Harry Dressel, the able scenic artist of the theater, has been for a long-time preparing scenes especially for this play” (p. 8). On Dec. 4, 1875, The New Orleans Bulletin further elaborated on the production and Dressel’s scenic contribution:
Elegant Scenery.
“The Two Orphans” at the Varieties.
No matter what the intrinsic beauty of strength of a drama may be, it is in the power of the scenic artist of the theater to greatly make or mar the play as a popular production. No drama is so good that it can be entirely independent of scenic accessories, and upon the artist who creates the scene it devolves to fitly picture the playwright’s ideal of situation and locality. We were led to these reflections by the sight was of the elaborate and artistic scenery which seen Thursday evening at The Varieties Theater in the play of “Two Orphans.” We have rarely witnessed more exquisite productions of the artist’s pencil. The snow scene, in which the very excellent portion of the drama is produced, was one of the most charming and life-like it has even been our good fortune to see; the floor of the stage seemed covered with beautiful snow and had not lain upon it long enough to lose its soft appearance, and had just been there sufficient time to gain a silver shimmer, which made it exquisitely delicate and charmingly picturesque. The beautiful garden and the palace of Belair was almost like a fairy picture in its beauty, and yet not to fanciful to be real. The entire front of the magnificent palace beautifully illuminated; a large and elegant terrace, lighted by handsome chandeliers, and opening upon a lovely garden, presented and elegant scene rarely if ever equaled here on the stage. The picture of the noble’s mansion and the beggar’s hovel were alike truthful and appropriate. Aside from the intrinsic merit of the play, and it is full of admirable points, the scenery should be seen by every lover of the artistic and beautiful in our city; it affords a rare treat and should be seen by all. Harry Dressel, the artist of the theater, deserves the highest praise for his great success” (p. 1).
His scenic work for “Two Orphans” was still being heralded at the beginning of 1876. On Jan. 16, The New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist of the theater, wields a pencil in a way that commands the earnest applause of all judges of true artistic ability, and the scenes in the play, when first presented at this theater, evoked the warmest praise for their real intrinsic merit” (p. 1).
Dressel quickly made a name for himself in New Orleans, repeatedly appearing in local headlines. I am amazed at the amount of press Dressel received for his work, as there was ample work in New Orleans that year; enough to keep several scenic artists employed at multiple theaters, including Anthony Bagnette, Thomas Burke, Angelo Wiser, and William T. Porter.
Fortunately for Dressel, he immediately secured the scenic art position at the Varieties Theater. By December 1875, the venue was leased and managed by Mrs. Henrietta Chanfrau and C. W. Tayleure for a short season. Earlier that fall, Mrs. Chanfrau made news when she attended a performance at the Varieties Theatre with her husband. On Nov. 11, 1875, the New Orleans Republican reported, “Mr. Frank S. Chanfrau, the comedian, and his wife, Mrs. Henrietta Chanfrau, occupied a box at the Varieties Theatre last night. In a professional way, these artists differ as much as do ‘Kit Redding’ and ‘Christie Johnstone’ on the stage, and they seldom meet, and never set together during the theatrical season. In the summer they are ‘at home’ in their comfortable Long Branch residence, playing domestic life in a congenial manner, and appearing an honorable example to the members of the profession” (p. 4).
On Dec. 12, 1875, The New Orleans Bulletin announced Dressel’s scenic work for Chanfrau in “Parted, or the Trust Company Failure,” at The Varieties Theater. The article reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist of the theater, has been engaged for some time in preparing the scenery for this play, and judging from the admirable exhibition of his skill we have witnessed this season, we predict a rare treat for visitors of the theater” (p. 5).
Dressel continued to make news during at the Varieties Theatre for the rest of the season. On Jan. 4, 1876, the New Orleans Bulletin reviewed Geo. Fawcett Rowe in Halliday’s dramatization of Dickens’s ‘David Copperfield,’ which he named ‘Little Eml’y’.’ The article reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist, has added new laurels to his list by the elegant and effective scenery used in the play. The boat-house, the church scene, which is, by the way, and exact representation of the Canterbury Cathedral in England, and the storm scene were all perfect gems of the painter’s skill and reflect the utmost credit upon the artist whose pencil formed them” (p. 1).
Of “Watts Phillip’s military and romantic drama ‘Col. Willoughby; or, Not Guilty,’ The New Orleans Bulletin announced, “The plot of the play is in itself very interesting and exciting, and with the truly magnificent setting given it last night, makes one of the most splendid stage attractions we have seen in this city for many a long day. The ship scene in the second act, and the third and fourth acts, were new artistic triumphs for Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the theatre” (25 Jan 1876, p. 5).
Dressel was also heralded for his work on other New Orleans projects that month. On January 9, 1876, The New Orleans Bulletin announced, “The equestrian statue of Jackson which adored the gallery of the Pickwick Club yesterday was executed by Mr. Harry Dressel, the talented scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, and was completed in an almost incredibly short space of time”) p. 1).
On Jan. 27, 1876, The Times-Picayune described the Washington Artillery Grand Ball at St. Patrick’s Hall: “But the most conspicuous object in the hall, and one upon which the gaze dwelt the longest, was a large sized painting that extended across the wall above the stage. The cartoon was done by Dressel, the scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, represented a scene in the Shenandoah Valley. In the far distance appeared the huge masses of the Blue Ridge, with its irregular profiled outlined against the sky and white masses of snow merging into the azure coloring of the mountain tops. The silvery course of the Rappahannock might be traced across the broad expanse of rolling green sward, until the glitter of the stream was lost on the obscurity of the forest that stretched along the foot of the mountain range. In the foreground appeared two small field pieces, and close by on the ground a pile of cannon balls, a drum, and a group of muskets. The general effect of then painting was excellent and attracted much attention” (p. 1).
Of Dressel’s painting for John T. Raymond, The New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Harry Dressel, the talented scenic artist of this theater, has, won additional honors for himself during Mr. Raymond’s engagement – the realistic effect of his steamboat explosion, and his beautiful landscape painting has evoked the warmest praise” (Feb. 6, 1876, p. 8).
Less than two weeks later The New Orleans Bulletin commended Dressel’s work on “Christie Johnstone” at the Varieties Theater: “The scenic effects are very fine, especially the lifeboat rescue, which is a perfect marvel in its way, and is another triumph for Mr. Harry Dressel.” (Feb. 18, 1876, p. 8).
On March 8, 1876, The New Orleans Bulletin heralded Dressel for scenery in Chanfrau’s production of “Kit” – “Mr. Harry Dressel has done all he possibly could to render the play attractive and has really produced some scenic effects worthy of applause always tendered by the audience. The steamboat and the cabin are beautifully painted” (p. 5).
Dressel worked in New Orleans until the end of the season, then followed the Chanfrau Company to New York for the summer. On April 30, 1876, the New Orleans Republican announced, “Mr. Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, leaves immediately for Chicago, and will be employed at the Eagle Theatre, New York, for the summer season” (p. 4). He left the city on May 4, heading up the river to Evansville, Indiana. On. May 9, 1876, The Evansville Journal announced, The Charles Morgan arrived at 1 am with a big trip of freight and a crowd of people” that included “Harry Dressel and A. Riet, scenic artists” (p. 7). I was fascinated to read, “The Morgan was five days and eight hours out from New Orleans, including all delays.” In Evansville, the ship “discharged 65 barrels molasses, 35 barrels sweet potatoes, 15 barrels rice, 10 of pineapples, 4 cases bananas, 10 sacks coffee, and other freight.” From Evansville, Dressel headed west to Chicago. He was heading home to visit family before starting a position in New York.
On May 7, 1876, The Brooklyn Sunday Sun announced, “Mr. Clifton W. Tayleure, manager of the Varieties Theatre, New Orleans, has entered into a contract with Mr. Josh Hart, of the Eagle Theatre, for occupancy by the Chanfrau Company of the latter place of amusement after June 5…This company will probably occupy the Eagle Theatre until the fall season opens when Hart again assumes the management with a strong comedy troupe” (p. 5). Located at Broadway and 33rd Street, Josh Hart was the sole proprietor. While examining a few activities at the Eagle Theatre in 1876, I was surprised to discover sheet music for “Emancipation Day,” dedicated to Mr. Josh Hart. The cover noted, “sung with immense success at the Eagle Theatre, New York.”
Braham, David, “Emancipation day: song and chorus ” (1876). Representations of Blackness in Music of the United States (1830-1920). Brown Digital Repository. Brown University Library.Here is the link: https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:17080/
Before Dressel joined the Chanfrau company in New York, he visited family in Chicago. It was early May in 1876. I wonder what brought Dressel home. It may have been his father’s declining health, as of May 1876, Louis Dressel made out his will.
When Dressel returned to New Orleans that fall, he resumed a position as scenic artist at The Varieties Theatre. On Nov. 11, 1876, Dressel was credited with the scenery for “Our Boys” under the management of Charles Pope.
Although Dressel was listed as scenic artist for the Varieties Theatre in the 1876 and 1877, New Orleans Directory, he also continued to complete a variety of projects that included fresco work. On Aug. 5, 1877, The Times-Picayune reported, “The ceiling of the office has been very prettily frescoed by Dressel, the scenic artist of the Varieties, and there are panels adorned with appropriate figures typifying industry and commerce. The steamboat Natchez has also a place among the figures on the ceiling. The walls are frescoed in scroll and figure work” (p. 1).
In 1877, Dressel was naturalized as a US Citizen.
The most interesting article that I discovered described Dressel’s work as a lighting artist. During the late 19th century, many scenic artists performed on stage. They would rapidly sketch characters or paint scenes as a variety act. At the Academy of Music in New Orleans, Dressel rapidly painted a tropical landscape for the benefit for Mr. William Morris, machinist of the theatre. On June 1, 1878, The Times-Picayune reported, “Harry Dressel, the scenic artist, who painted in sight of the audience, in less than eight minutes, a complete tropical landscape, commenting on a plain white canvas, six by eight feet. The subject was suggested by the audience, and the composition was the study of the moment. Time was called and the artist run a horizon line, spread on a warm sky, placed a mountain range, run a stretch of water, drew date and palm trees with spreading leaves, dropped a few bright flowers for perspective effect, and left a very pleasing picture for the admiration of an audience that was enthusiastic over such an exhibition of artistic skill and rapid execution” (p. 8). I have written about other lighting artists in the past and find their popular performances intriguing.
Despite accepting a variety of projects, in 1878, Dressel was still associated with the Chanfrau Company, even mentioned in their newspaper advertisements. On April 4, 1878, the Chattanooga Daily Times included an ad for the production of “KIT, The Arkansas Traveler.”
The article reported, “Their great work was witnessed by upwards of 400,000 personsat Booth’s Theater, New York, and has realized Mr. Chanfrau over $65,000… ENTIRELY NEWSCENERY by Harry Dressel, the famous Scenic Artist of New Orleans, especially painted for this production.”
Dressel delivered scenery for KIT in 1878.
On October 6, 1878, the Chicago Daily Tribune published an advertisement for “Dominick Murray, in his exciting and very successful drama, entitled ESCAPED FROM SING SING; or, Criminal Life in New York” at Hamlin’s Theatre, 87 Clark-st., opposite Court House” (p. 1). The ad announced, “The Drama will be produced with entirely new Scenery by MINARD LEWIS, Esq., and HARRY DRESSEL, Esq.”
This brings Dressel back to the home of his family in 1878.
By 1880, Dressel partnered with John Charles Evans in St. Louis to form Dressel & Evans, scenic artists. Their firm was listed in the New Orleans Directory for 1881 and 1882. Evans partnership with Dressel ended by 1883. Evans, however, continued to work as an artist in New Orleans, and was listed in the next three City directories. Although his address remained the same, his name shifted from Charles to John, and back again. Evans became another employee as the Chicago-based firm of Sosman & Landis employee. Here is the link to Evans’ biography https://drypigment.net/2023/04/08/sosman-landis-shaping-the-landscape-of-american-theatre-employee-no-103-j-c-evans/
J. C. Evans was a scenic artist who went on to work for Sosman & Landis in Chicago.
On May 10, 1883, The Times-Democrat published an article entitle “OUR SUMMER OPERA – Arrival Yesterday of Miss Alice Oates and Her Company for Spanish Fort” (p. 3). Their arrival was “over the Louisville and Nashville road” with a 25-person opera company. Originally coming from NY. “Mr. Harry S. Dressel, so well known here as a scenic artist and in connection with our theatres, has made the architectural designs and will superintend the decorations, scenery, etc. His past successes insure excellent work.”
On May 14, 1883, The Times-Democrat of New Orleans, reported about the Spanish Fort: “The gangs of workmen were engaged all day on the theatre over the water, just in front of the reck grotto, and the work will be continued night and day until completed. Already the joist for the floor have been laid, and as the rest of the frame-work has already been prepared to be put together, by the 20th the building will be completed, in time for the opening by the Alice Oate’s Opera Troupe. Piles are being driven for the foundation of that portion of the building to be occupied by the stage, which work will be finished by Tuesday. Harry Dressel is not losing a moment, and yesterday was hard at it, up on a scaffold, working on the new drop curtain. It will. Represent a scene in the days of Louis Quatorze. In the centre is a colonnade and portico of a palace, not unlike the Trianon, and before it a number of court ladies and gallants are engaged in the then favorite game of battledore and shuttlecock. The poses are graceful and the picture animated. Rich foliage gives a pleasant contrast to the white marble columns and adds a softness to the scene. Mr. Dressel is sparing no pains on this artistic study (p. 3).
Harry Dressel made news across the country. On Nov. 30, 1889, the Telegraphic News section of the Indianapolis Journal reported, “Harry Dressel, the well-known scenic artist, was dangerously stabbed at New Orleans, yesterday, by Ferdinand Amant” (p. 1). Dressel was now 38 yrs. old and wanted money for a project he completed.
On Dec. 3, 1889, the Cincinnati Commercial Gazette reported, “Harry Dressel, the well-known scenic artist of the New Orleans French Opera-house, was severely stabbed one day last week by a lawyer named Armant in a saloon adjoining the theater. The trouble grew out of an unpaid bill for work done by Dressel during the time of the Cotton Palace” (p. 8).
On Dec. 4, 1889, The Louisiana Review described the altercation about the unpaid bill:
“A difficulty occurred between Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the French Opera House, and Fernaud Armant, last Friday afternoon, in a barroom on Toulouse Street, over an unpaid bill for painting a stage curtain of the Cotton Place. Blows were exchanged and Dressel was cut on the face and neck by Armant. The wounds are not considered dangerous. Armant surrendered to Captain Journee, but was released under a $1000 bond” (p. 5).
Dressel briefly left Louisiana and headed to Texas. He picked up a variety of projects, including the design and decorations of floats for German Day. On Oct. 7, 1891, the Galveston Daily News announced, “By 6 am Mr. Harry Dressel, the artist in charge of the decorated floats was busy with a corps of hearty fellow, getting the heavy floats out of the warehouse sheds into the street” (p. 8).
By 1900 Dressel returned to New Orleans.
On Aug 24, 1900, The Canton Times of Canton, Miss. Reported, “The Manning-Yale Co., the biggest and most complete vaudeville aggregation touring the South will open at the Opera House Wednesday, September 12th…the company is composed of twenty vaudevillers who have made reputations and sustained them. A uniformed concert band and complete orchestra is included. Special scenery painted by the renowned scenic artist Dressel, is used. No expense has been spared to make this production one of the grandest in every detail and disappointment has yet to be evidenced by any audience” (p. 4).
On May 30, 1905, The Times-Democrat published Dressel’s obituary:
“Harry H. Dressel, a well-known scenic artist, dies at his home, 4318 Canal Street, yesterday afternoon, after an illness of several weeks. His death was a shock to his many friends and acquaintances in this city, for he had been actively engaged in his work up to a short time before his death. Mr. Dressel was born in Hanover, Germany, fifty-three years ago, in which place he received his early education in college as well as in art. He came to this country when a young man and engaged in scene painting. Thirty-one years ago, he came to New Orleans and had lived here since that time. Mr. Dressel became connected with the French Opera House, and for a time worked exclusively. For that playhouse, turning out many hundreds of pieces of work. His studio was in the building, and within those walls he acquired fame. Mr. Dressel did work for the Grand Opera House and also for the St. Charles Theatre. Mr. Dressel started Lake View Park and fixed up a studio at West End. He did much work on the park, and at the same time worked on Carnival ball settings. His work for the Atlanteans was always complimented. The work for the Atlanteans of this year was the last he did. Mr. Dressel was at one time a member of the Southern Yacht Club. He was a vice president of the Ozone Spring Water Company and was a Knight of America belonging to Crescent Lodge No. 110. Mr. Dressel is survived by his wife. The interment will take place to-morrow at the Greenwood Cemetery” (p. 10).
His will was published in The Times-Democrat on 2 Jun 1905, noting, “the will admitted to probate makes a number of bequests: $500 to Harry Groh; $200 to William O. Conne; $100 to Mrs. William Groh; $25 to Lizzie Brown – the remaining property given to Miss Annie L. Hall with $200 for the purpose of keeping the grave of the deceased. David Lemly appointed executor” (p. 10).
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}