Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. Employee No. 101: George W. Dayton, Sr.

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

While researching the life and career of Joseph C. Blaine, I stumbled across an 1885 newspaper article in the “Chicago Tribune.” The article made me both celebrate and curse. On Aug 2, 1885, the “Chicago Tribune” published a list of Sosman & Landis employees who contributed to the Grant Memorial Fund. This meant that I had to track down at least thirteen more individuals to include in the Sosman & Landis staff. That number immediately increased to fourteen, as George W. Dayton, could have been either the father or son; both were journeyman scenic artists, working in Chicago at the same time.

In 1885, George W. Dayton donated $1, the same amount as all of the other journeymen artists, with exception of Thomas Moses ($2) and Henry J. Buhler ($2). Dayton donated the same amount as fellow journeyman and one-time New York scenic artist, David A. Strong. Both Strong and Dayton were around the same age, and extremely well-respected by the theatre community, each well-versed in painted illusion and stage machinery for stage spectacles.

I am starting with George W. Dayton Sr., as he came first, and we share the same birthday.

George Washington Dayton, Sr. was born on June 19, 1839, in New York. The actual location of his birth varies, with some records suggesting Greene County and others New York City. Regardless of his birth location, his mother’s family (the Tompkins) was from Greene County. She was born, raised and married in Greene County, New York. For geographical context, Greene County is approximately 54 miles southwest of Albany, New York.

George was the youngest son of John Harvey Dayton (1797-1849) and Charlotte E. Tompkins (1794-1868). At the time of his birth, his parent’s had been married for over two decades and already celebrated the birth of eight children: James Harvey (1819-1820), Daniel (1821-1823), James Lewis (1824-1891), Mary Elizabeth (1825-1826), Oscar Veniah (1827-1898), George Washington (1829-1829), John Harvey Dayton (1830-), and Julie Ann “Emma” Dayton (182-1835).  In examining both birth and death dates, many of the Dayton children did not survive infancy or early childhood. Little is known of Dayton’s youth, or any moment that prompted him to seek a career in scenic art. His father passed away in 1849, when Dayton was only ten years old.  Five years later, Dayton was working at the Bowery Theatre in New York City; a 15-yrs.-old scenic art apprentice. For theatrical context, this is the second Bowery Theatre; the one designed by architect John Trimble that opened on August 4, 1845. The structure lasts until 1929. For geographical context, the Bowery Theatre was located on the Lower East Side of Manhattan.

I have yet to track down any early connections between the Dayton family and the Bowery theater, any tie to the theatre that may have prompted the selection of this occupation. However, the Bowery Theatre repeatedly placed want ads for scenic artists. April 9, 1856, “The New York Daily Herald” advertised:

“SPECIAL NOTICE – WANTED AT THE BOWERY theatre, a first-rate scenic artist; also a good property man. Apply, personally or by letter, prepaid, to Geo. H. Griffith, Acting Manager, Bowery Theatre, New York” (page 7). In 1856, the interior of the Bowery Theatre was featured in the Sept. 13 issue of “Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper.”

The Bowery Theatre Stage in 1856

Dayton was likely still living at home when he worked at the Bowery Theatre in 1857. His mother was listed in the New York City Directory: “Dayton, Charlotte, widow, h. 168 W. 37th.”

The Bowery lost a scenic artist the year before Dayton began there. On March 11, 1854, “New York Daily” announced that Bowery Theatre, Hamilton,  scenic artist left for Australia (page 2). J. Thorne also worked at the Bowery in 1854. John Thorne was credited with painting scenery for the “Seven Temptations” at the Bowery Theatre as part of a “Grand Scenic Spectacle” of June 1855.  This means that Dayton most likely assisted Thorne when he first started at the Bowery Theatre that year. In 1855, Thorne and Samuel Culbert were credited with new scenery for “A Grand Military Spectacle” (“New York Herald” 16 Aug. 1855, page 3). Thorne & Culbert had also painted scenery for the pantomime “The Enchanted Temple,” performed at the Bowery Theatre in 1854. In 1859, John Thorne was one of only two scenic and panoramic artists listed in the New York City Business Directory; the other was Oscar F. Almy.

As Dayton gained experience, he began securing employment elsewhere, working for George Christy at Dayton at Niblo’s Garden by 1857. About this same time, David A. Strong also worked at Niblo’s. By 1858, Dayton relocated to Boston where he briefly worked at the Howard Anthenaeum. In1860, he was again actively engaged at Wallack’s Theatre in New York, then American Theatre in Philadelphia.

It was during this time when Dayton married his first wife, Julia A. Sails. The couple soon celebrated the birth of their first child, George W. Dayton, Jr., in 1862. Dayton Jr. would continue in his father’s line, working as a scenic artist.

Between 1862 and 1867, Dayton worked as a scenic artist at the Grand Opera House in New York. In 1867, Dayton became associated with New York’s Broadway Theatre, credited with painting scenery for Tom Robertson’s “Caste.” Dayton continued to paint at a variety of venues throughout the region.

In 1871 Dayton returned to the Grand Opera House, painting scenery for several Augustin Daly productions. Dayton and Louis Duflocq assisted Richard Marston on several productions, continuing to work with Heister until the mid-1870s. They painted scenery at various venues throughout the region, including a production of “Macbeth” at Boston’s Globe Theatre.

However, On June 9, 1871, Dayton’s work at Pike’s Opera-House was mentioned in “The American Israelite” (page 10). The article reported, “For the past few months, it is well known to our citizens that the enterprising Mr. S. N. Pike has been remodeling his concert hall with a view to its conversion into an opera-house that might equal, if not eclipse, in beauty and elegance of finish the former structure…The scenic artist is Mr. Joseph Pigott, and Mr. George Dayton, of the Grand Opera of New York, has been engaged to paint several scenes with special reference to the opening night.” Purportedly, it was James Fisk (managed of the Grand Opera House) who sent Dayton to the newly-constructed Pike’s Opera House in Cincinnati. Years later, Dayton recalled that when he arrived at Pike’s, “there was nothing but the bare wall.” Over the course of six weeks, he painted enough scenery to stage five operas. Interestingly, articles from the time note that the set pieces and wings were constructed of sheet iron.

In 1868, Dayton’s mother passed away in New York. At the time, Dayton was 29 years old; his career was taking off and he was making quite a name for himself. Her obituary simply announced: “DAYTON. – On Tuesday, March 10, Charlotte Dayton, aged 73 years, relict of John H. Dayton and daughter of Hon. Nehemiah Tompkins, of Greene County, N. Y. Funeral on Thursday morning at eleven o’clock from the residence of her son, 128th street and Seventh avenue.”

In 1869 the couple celebrated the birth of their second son, Charles E. Dayton. By 1870 Census Dayton household as including George W. (35 years old, painter), Julia A. (31 yrs. old). George W. Jr. (8 yrs.) and Charles E. (4 months old, born in Feb.). Sadly, Charles passed away the same year.

In 1872, Dayton was listed as an artist in the New York City Directory, living at 274 W 19th.

In New York, Dayton was also associated with Niblo’s Garden Theatre. This association was mentioned after a riding accident made the newspapers. On Aug. 24, 1874, “The Brooklyn Union” reported, “Mr. George W. Dayton, scenic artist of Niblo’s Theatre, Miss Margaret Clinton, and actress, Dr. Spier, and his wife of New York, visited Cypress Hills yesterday. While the carriage in which they were riding was descending one of the steep paths in the cemetery, a portion of the harness broke and the horses became frightened and ran away. The carriage was upset near the entrance and the driver and all the occupants were thrown out and sustained more or less serious injuries.”

This same year the couple celebrated the birth of another child, Florence Estelle Dayton (1874-1955). Florence was born in Flatbush, Long Island, New York. A section of her obituary notes her lineage: “Florence E. Dayton, born September 19, 1874, at Flatbush, Long Island, was descended from an old family who first settled in this country in 1629. Her grandfather, Jonathan Dayton, was the youngest signer of the Constitution of the United States, and her great uncle, Daniel Tompkins, was twice Governor of New York State and Vice-President under President Monroe.” This is not accurate, as her grandfather was born in 1797. I have yet to verify any connection to Johnathan Dayton (1760-1824), the 26-yrs.-old signer of the Constitution from New Jersey.

In 1875, Dayton was credited as one of the scenic artists credited with painting scenery for Charlotte Cushman. Her farewell performance at the Globe Theatre on May 15, 1875, listed George Heister, George W. Dayton and Joseph Schnell as scenic artists, as part of the executive staff.

As with many scenic art families, the birth of each Dayton child helps track the family’s travels. Sometime between the birth of Florence and the birth of Arthur, the Daytons moved from New York to California. By 1876, the Daytons relocated to California. Arthur B. Dayton was born in San Francisco that year. At the time, Dayton Sr. was listed as the scenic artist for Baldwin’s Academy of Music (also known as Baldwin’s Theatre). The remained in the area for three years. During this time, Dayton Jr. began assisting his father. In 1878, George W. Dayton, Jr., was also listed as a scenic artist at Baldwin’s Theatre, working as an assistant to his well-known father.

Geo. W. Dayton worked as a scenic artist at the Baldwin Theatre in San Francisco.

Dayton Sr. was making headlines in 1878 and was featured in “The Footlight,” a San Francisco Journal. The article about Dayton Sr. provides an abundance of details about his career up until this point. His portrait was included with the article and remains the only known image of the artist.

The subject of our illustration, Mr. George Washington Dayton, whose scenery of Joaquin Miller’s California Drama, “The Danites,” lately produced and now being performed at Baldwin’s Theatre, has brought him prominently before the San Francisco public, belongs to a family of artists. His brother, Oscar V. Dayton, was scene painter for Maguire in 1849 and ’50, and may be said to have been a pioneer scenic artist in California. Old ‘49ers can remember with what pleasure the stage pictures, made to illustrate the plays, produced at the Jenny Lind Theater were viewed.

One of the most celebrated American scenic artists, Minard Lewis belongs to a branch of the Dayton family, being to George W., whose style closely resembles that of Lewis.

Possess of inherent and natural abilities to become eminent in his profession, Dayton has been quite fortunate in the school wherein he has gained knowledge and experience. At the age of 15, in 1855, he was employed at the Bowery Theatre, New York, then under the management of Messrs. Eddy and Johnson. In 1856 and ’57 under the direction of Mr. Lehman, he assisted in the production of the ‘Red Gnome’ and ‘Green Monster’ series of pantomimes by the Ravels, probably the most gorgeous spectacle of the kind ever brought out in the United States. In the same year, Dayton painted scenery for George Christy, next or to Niblo’s, and in the following year, 1858, we find him at the Howard, Boston, for a short session of six months, under engagements to J. M. Nixon. Returning, however, to New York, he was engaged in1860 at the Broadway Theater (then named the Wallacks) thence for a short season to Philadelphia at the American Theater, and back again to the Broadway Theater, New York under manager Wood and Barney Williams; from there to the Grand Opera House, managed by James Fisk, where he remained five years, and was sent by him in 1867 to Pike’s Opera House, Cincinnati. When Dayton commenced work at Pike’s Opera House, there was nothing but the bare walls and in six weeks he had scenery sufficient for the production of five operas, the set pieces and wing boards being painted on sheet iron. The Fisk engagement was followed by one of one year under Augustin Daly, as the Globe Theater, Boston, which brings his dates to 1875. From there he went for short season to Concord, N. H., where Tom Maguire the shrewd manager of Baldwin’s, who always keeps track of all kinds of first-class talent, until a favorable opportunity of securing it occurs, found and imported him expressly for Baldwins theater. The result has fully justified Maguire’s good judgement. Theater goers are familiar with the work Dayton has placed on view since his advent at Baldwin Theater and those possessed of aesthetic taste readily recognized the hand of a master craftsman. The modesty of the artist prevents his asserting his just claim to recognize.”

Th article is a remarkable compilation of events, constructing Dayton’s scenic art career from 1856-1878. This, combined with other historical records, give a detailed account of Dayton’s travels.

The Dayton’s were still living in San Francisco the following year. Dayton was still associated with the Baldwin Theater, but was also painting for the Grand Opera House. On April 9, 1879, “The San Francisco Examiner” announced, “Baldwin’s Theatre. – Another crowded house witnessed A Scrap of Paper at this place last evening. The play was admirably produced and the actors, with one or two exceptions, filled their roles to the entire satisfaction of all present. Mr. Dayton, the scenic artist, has surpassed all his previous efforts by the second and third scenes of the play. The formerly is arranged, and we understand that the articles on the stage used in the ornamentation are valued about $6,000” (page 3). On May 5, 1879, “The San Francisco Examiner” listed George W. Dayton as the scenic artist for ‘Aida’ at the Grand Opera House (page 2).

On August 16, 1879, “The Pacific Bee” mentioned Dayton in an article entitled “Stock Speculations” (page 2). The article announced, “He is interested in the actors’ mine known as Uncle Same, at Bodie, and has also bought a large farm in Maryland, where there will be quite a theatrical colony, since Lewis Morrison, Dayton (scenic artist) and many others have purchased land in the same district” (page 2). They kept a home in Harmony, Caroline County, Maryland in 1880, the US Federal Census listed the Dayton family in Harmony. The census was taken on June 3, 1880. George W. Dayton Sr. and Jr. were both listed as artists. Other members of the Dayton household included: his wife, Julia Dayton; and his younger children Florence (6 yrs.) and Arthur B. Dayton (3 yrs.).   The 1880 US Federal Census listed the Dayton Household in Chicago too, and including: head of household, George W. Dayton, Sr.; his wife, Julia Dayton; his eldest son, George W. Dayton, Jr.; and his younger children Florence (6 yrs.) and Arthur B. Dayton (3 yrs.).  Both Sr. and Jr. George W. Dayton worked as artists. The census listed both George W. Dayton Sr George W. Dayton Jr. as artists.In both census reports, Dayton Sr. was listed as 35 years old, and Dayton Jr. was listed as 19 yrs. old. In fact, Dayton Sr. was 41 years old. Daytons work in Chicago makes sense. This is the same time that Sosman & Landis began to expand their scenic art staff.  Sometime between 1878 and 1880, Dayton relocated his family east, both he and his son continue to work as scenic artists.

Between the summer of 1879 and the summer of 1880, the Dayton family relocated with Chicago. Dayton Sr. was soon featured in the Chicago Tribune.

On August 15, 1880, the “Chicago Tribune” reported:

Hamlin’s Scenic Artist.

Mr. George W. Dayton, the scenic artist at the new Grand Opera House (Hamlin’s), began his labors last Monday, being assisted by his son. As very much of the success of the new theatre will depend upon the efforts of Mr. Dayton, a short sketch of his career as an artist is appended. Mr. Dayton comes from a family of artists, his brother, Mr. Oscar V. Dayton, having been the first artist in Maguire’s ‘Jenny Lind.’ Theater in San Francisco in 1849. Minard Lewis, recently deceased, was his cousin. Possessed of inherent abilities for his profession, Mr. Dayton has gained great knowledge and proficiency. At the age of 15 he was first employed at the Old Bowery Theatre, New York, then managed by Eddy and Johnson. In 1856 and 1857 he assisted in the production of the “Red Gnome” and the “Green Monster,” under the direction of Mr. Lehman. These painted pantomimic spectacles, which introduced the celebrated Ravel family, were at that time considered the most gorgeous ever produced in America. In 1857 he also painted the scenery for George Christy’s Minstrel Hall, next door to Niblo’s. In 1858 he went to the Howard, Boston, then under the management of James M. Nixon. In 1860 he returned to New York, engaging at the Broadway Theatre (then named Wallack’s). Thence he went to the American, Philadelphia, but returned to the Broadway when Wood and Barney Williams assumed its control. From Broadway he went to the Grand Opera-House with James Fisk, where he remained five years. Going to Cincinnati during that time to fit Pike’s Opera House with a stock of scenery. After the Fisk engagement he went to Boston with Augustin Daly as artist for the Globe Theatre. Mr. Dayton was then sought by manager Tom Maguire for Baldwin’s magnificent Academy of Music, San Francisco. Mr. Hamlin secures him direct from the last-named house.

Mr. Dayton is unknown to Chicago, but when it is understood that the scene for McKee Rankin’s “Danites,” which have so often received praise here, were originally designed by Mr. Dayton, there will be a favorable opinion of his merits as an artist. He was complimented with a call for each scene when they were first disclosed at Baldwin’s Theatre. There is no mean praise, coming as it did from the forty-niners themselves.

Mr. Dayton will have a new drop-curtain ready for the approaching opening of the new house.”

Both Hamlin and is son were also working as scenic artists at the new Grand Opera House. On September 5, 1880, the “Chicago Tribune” reported that “the entr’acte curtain has been painted by Mr. Dayton” (page 11). Later in the article, Dayton was again listed as part of the backstage staff: “George W. Dayton, scenic artist; George W. Dayton, Jr. assistant; John Foust, machinist; John Dolan, master of properties.” Dayton was mentioned in another Chicago Daily Tribune” article on that same day (page 16). The article reports, “In the way of a drop curtain a new departure has been made, one of a dark crimson cloth, with deep Roman fringe, having been chosen, while an entr’acte curtain has been painted by Mr. Dayton…The principal officers of the house will be John A. Hamlin, Manager; William H. Davis, associate manager; George W. Dayton, scenic artist; George W. Dayton, Jr., assistant…”.

However, George W Dayton Sr. and Jr. are counted in the 1880 census twice. The same happened in 1900.

On Oct. 2, 1880, the “Chicago Daily Telegraph credited George W. Dayton as painting scenery for T. W. Keene (p. 4). The article reported, “The plays in Which Mr. Keen has the honor to make his stellar debut in Chicago will be produced under the immediate supervision of the veteran Charles Webb, of Drury Lane Theatre, London. New and brilliant scenery by George W. Dayton.” I am relatively certain that the article is referring to Dayton Sr., despite the fact that he was continuously assisted by his son. In 1880, Dayton Sr. is 41 yrs. old, and Dayton Jr. is 18 yrs. old.  Five years later, it was a different story. Age and experience in Dayton Jr.’s part brings his name into play.

Both Dayton and his son continue to paint scenery in both Chicago and New York.  By 1882, Dayton Sr. is associated with New York’s Standard Theatre, where he worked alongside Phillip Goatcher, G. Heineman, John Mazzanovich and J. W. Rough. In 1883, Dayton paints scenery for “Michaëla,” with his son listed as an assistant. Other New York shows include painting with Mazzanovich to deliver scenery for “The Rajah” at Madison Square Theatre in 1883. The following year Dayton painted scenery for “Sea of Ice” with William Voegtlin and his son at the Buffalo Academy of Music. On September 9, 1883, “The Philadelphia Times” announced, “The scene in the Polar regions, which has been painted by George Dayton, the scenic artist at the Union Square Theater, for “The Sea of Ice,” to be presented at the Walnut, has been made from drawings furnished by an old arctic explorer. It is described as very novel and effective” (page 3).

In 1884, both Dayton Sr. and Jr. were listed in the Brooklyn City Directory:

George Dayton, painter, h. 28 Whipple

George Dayton, painter, 133 22nd.

The George Dayton at 133 22nd would retain this address until 1898, suggesting that this was the address of Dayton Sr; Dayton Jr. passed away in 1897.

In 1884, Dayton is working in Hartford, Conn. At the Opera House. On July 30, 1884, the “Hartford Courant” reported:

“WELCOME IMPROVEMENTS.

When the entertainment season at the opera house reopens, a few weeks hence, the patrons of this place of amusement will observe and appreciate many improvements. Just now the stage is piled up with work benches and the paraphernalia used by scenic artists and stage carpenters, and on every hand sections of scenery are stacked in confusing order. High upon the wall back of the stage, on an improved platform, scene painters are working on the new drop curtain for the proscenium arch, which is to take the place of the green cloth curtain that had done service since the opera house was opened. The subject for the new curtain is the popular picture by Carl Becker of ‘Othello’s Story.’ The Moor leans against the railing of the Venetian balcony recounting his exploits to Brabanco, and Desdemona sits at her father’s feet a charmed listener, while in the distance, across the grand canal, loom up the Campanile tower and the church domes, just as they now do in sleepy old Venice, and as Becker believed they did when Othello was moving the susceptible heart of Desdemona. The curtain will be 45 by 39 feet square. It is being painted by Mr. George W. Dayton of the Star theater, New York, a scenic artist of considerable reputation, and whose work is known to Hartford’s theater-goers by the few sets of new scenery introduced at the opera house last season and the year before. Mr. Dayton has been at work at the opera house for the past six weeks, and among the new scenes that he has painted are a mediæval castle gateway, hemmed in with battlement walls; an interior prison scene – very effective in drawing and perspective; a street scene specially adapted for pantomime tricks; a baronial chamber of the Norman period; with its stone walls and tapestries; and attic scene, and others of minor nature. All these scenes have the necessary border drops and wings. The auditorium of the theater has been renovated and freshly painted and the entrance from Main street is made more inviting by a fresh coat of paint. Mr. Roberts is to be commended for giving his opera house these new touches, and he will no doubt reap a compensating patronage from them” (page 2).

In 1885, Dayton and his son primarily work and exhibit their fine art in Chicago. This is what makes the 1885 Sosman & Landis staff list difficult to interpret. In 1885, Dayton Sr. had been working as a scenic artist since 1856. His son had been listed as a scenic artist since 1878. Although Dayton Sr. Had much more experience, 29-yrs.-old Dayton Jr. was also a journeyman artist. Both were listed in the Scene Painter’s show of 1885. Dayton Sr. and Dayton Jr. were even part of the planning committee. On August 1, 1885, the “Inter Ocean” reported, “The scenic artists of this city held a meeting this week at Parker Galleries and determined to hold an exhibition and sale of works in distemper at those galleries early in September. Among the artists present were Ernest Albert, John Mezzovico, Walter Burridge, David A. Strong, John Howard Rogers, Henry Tryon, George Dayton, Thomas Moses, John Howell Wilson, H. E. Bucky, Charles Ritter, and others” (page 4). Both Dayton’s were also mentioned in John Moran’s article about the event, published in “Art Union, a Monthly Magazine of Art” (Vol. 2, No. 4, 1885, p. 85). Moran wrote,” “Other works deserving of notice are Messrs. George Dayton, Sr., George Dayton, Jr.” I would suspect that BOTH George Dayton Sr. and George Dayton Jr. were part-time employees at Sosman & Landis in the mid-1880s. During this time, Sosman & Landis also ran a branch office in New York. Many of their employees shifted between the two regions; heading wherever their skills were needed. Such was the case with Dayton Sr. and Dayton Jr. By 1885, they had consistently worked together since 1878. It seems unlikely that only father or son would work at Sosman & Landis, as they worked as a pair.

On April 15, 1885, the “Buffalo Morning Express” mentioned Dayton’s continued scenic art work in New York (page. 5): “Mr. J. C. Rother, who ranks among the foremost portrait artists of Buffalo, had not yet moved to New York, as has been stated. On his recent visit to New York, he made arrangements with Mr. George Dayton, the celebrated scenic artist, formerly of the Standard and Star Theatres, New York, whereby he is enabled to furnish scenery for theatres and halls from the cheapest to the most elaborate and artistic. Mr. Rother has moved his studio from the Austin building to his old stand, No. 366 Main Street, so that he can personally supervise his sign and decorative establishment, and will also continue his portrait painting, Mr. Rother’s abilities as an artist are too well known to need further comment. If he goes to New York to live it will not be until autumn, and in the meantime, he will receive orders for portraits as heretofore.”

It was in 1885 that his first wife passed away. He remarried two years later. His second wife was Mary McCarty (1866-1931). The couple celebrated the birth of three of whom survived infancy. Their children were Irvin W (July 1888), Eugene H. (July 1891), and Oscar V. (Sept. 1897).  

In 1887, Dayton was again working in New York with Voegtlin and delivering scenery for “Peg Woffington” at the New York Lyceum. He was also working with George Hineman. On May 26, 1887, “The Morning Journal-Courier” announced their work at the New Haven Opera House: “Two scenic artists of acknowledged ability, George W. Dayton and George Hineman, have already arrived and begun the work of adding important improvements in the scenic department, under Manager Wall’s direction” (page 2).

In 1889, Dayton Sr. and Dayton Jr. were again living out east, each listed as a painter in the Brooklyn City Directory, with George Dayton Sr, residing at 133 22nd and

George Dayton, Jr. at 203 Varet St.; their residences located quite far apart. Dayton and his father soon began representing the William F. Wise studio in Tyrone, Pennsylvania.

On September 17, 1889, the “Tyron Daily Herald” reported, “Two young men named Leon Moan and George Dayton [Jr.], scenic artists who have been in the employ of W. F. Wise in Tyrone for nearly three months had their room in the building of Mr. Scullin, the tailor. About a month ago they broke a large French plate mirror in their room. They promised to pay for the damage done, but last night it was discovered that they were trying to sneak away on Philadelphia Express. Mr. Sculin did not care as far as the price of glass was concerned but he deemed it right to put a quietus on such a mean trick. Accordingly, he armed officer Snyder, with a warrant and together they went to the depot for the men. The fugitives were in hiding on the hill side of the railroad, and when the train arrived, they endeavored to board without being seen. Mr. Scullin and the officer made a dash for their men and secured Dayton, but Moan succeeded in eluding his pursuers. Dayton was taken before Esquire Taylor and settled the affair by paying the damage and costs” (page 2).

By 1889, George W. Dayton is listed as an artist in the New York City Directory, living at 330 E 77th. By 1891, only George W. Dayton, Jr. was listed in the New York City Directory, living at 324 E 85th St.

In 1891, the Dayton family lived in Pennsylvania, as a son, Eugene was born in Philadelphia that July.

From 1892 to 1894, the Daytons lived in New York, as “George Dayton, artist,” was listed in the directory, living at 513 E 117th St.

In 1894, Dayton’s past affiliation with Wallack’s Theatre in New York was mentioned in various newspaper articles about Henry Arthur Jones’ touring production of “The Silver King.” On Dec. 7, 1894, “The Clinton Register” reported that “All of the beautiful scenery for which the ‘Silver King’ is famous, is carried completed and was painted by George Dayton, former scenic artist of Wallack’s theater in New York” (page 2). On Oct. 16, 1895, the “Argus and Patriot” advertised the show at the Blanchard Opera House in Montpelier, Vermont. It noted, “All of the beautiful scenery for which ‘The Silver King’ is famous is carried complete, and was painted by George Dayton, former scenic artist at Wallack’s Theatre, New York” (page 3).

Interestingly, in 1896, the former residence of George W. Dayton was mentioned in the “Brooklyn Citizen” (2 Aug. 1896, page 23). The home and grounds were described in great detail. The article reported, “Patrick Ford lives on the Coleman place, now called ‘Dayton’s’ because it was once owned by George W. Dayton, the scenic artist, who during his occupancy of the place entertained some of the stage celebrities of the times.”

In 1897, however, both Dayton’s were listed in the NYC Directory:

Dayton Geo W artist h 1088 Park av

Dayton Geo W artist h 264 W 118th

That year, Dayton Jr. died of tuberculosis laryngitis at 34 yrs. old on April 5, 1897. He had been sick for three months before he passed. Dayton Jr. was buried in Middle Village, Queens, New York, he left a 2 yrs. old son (Jerome J. Dayton) and five-yrs. old daughter (Julia Agnes Dayton) daughter. Dayton Sr. had only a little time to grieve the passing of loved one. Three weeks later, he was bas at work. On April 28, 1897, the “Tyrone Daily Herald” of Tyrone, Pennsylvania, reported, “George W, Dayton, the veteran scenic artist, with a. corps of assistants, has begun work upon the extensive scenery to be used by the Harry M. Dry Pyrotechnic company in their new spectacular production ‘The Bombardment of Fort Sumter or the Siege of Charleston,’ which will be ready for presentation on the road in a few weeks. Altoona is anxious to be the first city to witness this gorgeous pyrotechnic festival, and it may be that the season will be opened there” (page 4). 

Dayton Sr. had relocated to Tyrone. This move was recalled by his son, Oscar Dayton, years later. On Dec. 22, 1976, the “Tyrone Daily” published an article about the loss of the Wilson Theatre, entitled “The Curtain Comes Down” (page 6). Much of the artist focused on George W. Dayton, Sr.:

“Oscar Dayton’s father was a member of the Wise Studio, and a superb painter. Originally from New York City, the elder Dayton was employed by a very industrious organization of that city as a scenic painter and artist. When the Wise Studio came into being during the 1880s, George W. Dayton was contacted by Wise to come to Tyrone and further his professional technique by joining Wise’s staff in his studio on 12th street. The offer was accepted, and the Dayton family moved to Tyrone, where living conditions were less expensive than the larger, metropolitan areas, and, yet, the wages were most attractive. George W. Dayton continued his profession until his death in 1908.  The Wise studio was a very busy establishment, painting scenery for theatres over a vast area. In fact, orders were well ahead of the work and became so prominent. That Wise drew in professional painters from many large cities.”

Oscar Dayton reminisced, “Ten professional painters worked from dawn to dark. It was a tremendous business, since scenery was an exclusive part of stage settings, and was in constant demand.”

George Dayton Sr. and the Wise Studio made headlines again in 1993. On July 24, 1993, the “Tyrone Daily Herald” published an article on the renovation of the oldest building in Tyrone (pages 1-2). On the second page of the article, the history of the building was examined: “The Woodshop building, which looks similar to a big old red barn, has a long history in the community, being the oldest building now standing in the borough. Built in 1855 it was first used as a church by the former United Brethren Congregation (now First United Methodist Church), and later became a Civil War hospital. The next occupancy of the building came in the form of scenic artists and a theatrical studio for W. F. Wise Co. and for George Dayton. Eventually Miller Brothers (Hardware) used it for storage for about sixty years, selling it to Lee Wertz, who also used it for storage. Mr. Anderson purchased the property in 1992 with a goal of restoring the building and using the second floor for his custom woodwork shop. Among his talents, Mr. Anderson makes moldings for other people restoring buildings.” The building stands at the corner of 12th Street and Washington Avenue. It was the theatrical posters uncovered during Anderson’s restoration that brought this building into the public eye again. On Feb. 27, 1993, the “Tyrone Daily Herald” reported, “Some pulley fixtures used for lifting scenery were found on the second floor. They were unique because of the four cut-out heart designs on each side of the pulleys. Samples of wall covering in which old wall paper was used as the canvas have been given to the historical society” (page 1). Here is a link to a photo gallery for Tyrone’s Oldest Building: https://tyronesoldestbuilding.com/gallery/

Additional research revealed that in 1888 the church building was sold to W.F. Wise and W.B. Stewart. The building was again sold in 1895 to A.A. Stevens and it would never again be in a position of importance to the community until it became the oldest building in Tyrone. After the purchase of the building by A.A. Stevens in 1895, it changed hands 11 more times. 

On Feb. 24, 1898, the “Tyrone Daily Herald” included two articles about Dayton. The first was a letter written by Dayton entitled “A Strong Team” (page 4). It reported, “After frequent solicitations of a number of my friends who wished me to teach the art of drawing and painting in their several branches, I write this to all those who wish to take lessons, that I have associated myself with the Penn Art Co. school as one of their instructors and will faithfully do my part to educate all pupils who study with me, and if they will prove as studious and apply themselves on their part, they will have no cause to complain; attentive pupils will certainly attain such progression that they will be more than pleases with their venture. – Geo. W. Dayton.”

The second article reported, “The fine suite of rooms comprising the second floor of the First National Bank building is now occupied by the Penn Art company, of which M. D. McOmber is manager. The four rooms have been newly papered and renovated, presenting an attractive appearance. The front rooms will be occupied as the main office and clerical department, and the rooms facing Tenth street will be devoted to the teaching departments in charge of George W. Dayton and William H. Kellogg. The Penn Art company have for a long time been negotiating with some of the well-known artists of the country and have finally secured the services of these two experienced artists, who are known throughout the United States, and their paintings have been recognized and acknowledged by the artists of the world as masterpieces. As experienced teachers they probably have no superiors” (page 4).

Dayton Sr. continued to be listed in the newspaper. He was mentioned in a multi-page article entitled “How a Play is Staged.” On Aug 21, 1898 the “New York Times” reported, “Scenic artists have for years used the device of model scenes – that is, they have roughly constructed a small model as guides to the carpenters in making the larger scenery’ but Josef A Physioc, the young scenic artist of the Garrick Theatre, claims to have been the first to use the miniature stage, complete in every detail, for the guidance of actors, managers, carpenters, and ‘utility’ men. The accompanying picture of the model stage, set for the first scene in ‘Tess of the D’Urbervilles,’ illustrates the miniature stage as used by Mr. Physioc…Another picture shows the model stage set for a scene in ‘Couried Into Court. These miniature scenes are constructed in the ‘model room.’ The picture shows Mr. Physioc and George W. Dayton. An ‘exterior’ painter, at work upon a sketch preparatory to transforming their idea into a model. On the walls, on the table – everywhere – are models, sketches, and the countless suggestive things that litter up the studio.” (p. 27). Dayton Sr.  was noted as simply “an exterior painter.”

By that fall, the Dayton family had moved again.  On October 3, 1898, the “Altoona Tribune” announced, George W. Dayton, 623 West Washington. The scenic artist, with his family has removed to Thomastown” (page 3)

Dayton Sr. was listed as still living at Park Ave., confirmed in the 1900 US Federal Census. That year, the Dayton Sr. household at 1088 Park included: Geo. Sr. (Jun 1840, 59 yrs., married 12, scenic artist), Mary (Aug 1866, 33 yrs., mother of 4), Irwin W. (July 1888, 11 yrs.), Eugene (July 1891, 8 yrs., Philadelphia), Oscar V (Sept, 1897, 2 yrs.), Florence E (Sept 1874, 25 yrs.), Arthur B. (Nov 1876, 23 yrs., California, artist), Mary McCarty (Mother-in-law, May 1843, 57 yrs., mother of 13).

They were also counted in a second census report that year. In 1900 the Dayton family was also listed as living in Snyder, Blair, Pennsylvania. The Dayton household included George, Mary, Irwin, Eugene, Oscar V., Florence, Arthur, and his mother-in-law Mary McCarty.

On March 31, 1904, the “Tyrone Herald” reported, “George Washington Dayton, Tyrone’s boss artist, Vail’s central station postmaster, and the general community’s greatest jokester was in town Monday with four telescopes, a monster magnifying glass, a double-action six shooter Colt’s army revolver and a belt full of cartridges, looking for a lot which he purchased recently and upon which he advanced one-third of the purchase money but failed to get information as to the location of the property” (page 5).

On Sept. 11, 1904, “The Brooklyn Daily Citizen” reported, “The veteran scenic artist, George W. Dayton, painted the scene for Milton Nobles’ new comedy, ‘The Days of ’49.’ In 1875, Mr. Dayton got up the first scene for ‘The Phoenix,’ when Milton Nobles came forward as a star, in the now famous play of that name. Mr. Dayton has painted nearly one-half of the cycloramas that have been exhibited in this country since the Civil War” (page 3].

George W. Dayton Sr. passed away shortly after his 80th birthday, He died in Snyder Township, Blair Country, Pennsylvania, on June 25, 1909. The cause of death was listed as “Chronic Interstitial Nephritis,” an ailment that had lasted for approximately 6 months. His occupation was listed as “artist.” Dayton was buried in Grandview Cemetery, Tyrone, Blair County, PA.  His obituary was published in the “Tyrone Daily Herald on Jan. 27, 1909 (page 4).  It stated:

“FAMOUS ARTIST GONE. On Monday afternoon at 8:30 o’clock, George W. Dayton, the famous scenic artist. Died at his home at Vail. Mr. Dayton had been in failing health the past years from complication of diseases and was unable to leave his home the past two months. He gradually grew worse until death claimed him at the above-mentioned time.  He was a kind, affectionate husband and father and will be greatly missed in the home. George W. Dayton was born in New York City, June 19, 1839, making his age 69 years, 7 months and 6 days. Mr. Dayton was married twice. His first wife preceded him to the grave in 1885. Two children were born to this union. His second wife, Mary E. Dayton, and the following children survive’ Mrs. William Ruhe, of China, Arthur B. Dayton, New Milford, Ohio, Irving. Eugene and Oscar, at home. The funeral will occur on Thursday afternoon at 1:30 o’clock. Services conducted at the home by Rev. George T. Gunter. Interment in Grand View Cemetery, Tyrone.”

His Eulogy was also included in the article:

“Eulogy of Geo. W. Dayton. One more friend is gone, one more father less, one more familiar face missed from among us. George W. Dayton passed away Jan. 25the. He has left a vacancy in the world of painters, for he was no common craft. His hand that held the brush was of cunning skill, as he stood high among the galaxy of old school painters fast fading from our midst. Although old it be, yet it was glorious in its day, as it has pointed the way to the newer school of painters. Just as from Chaucer sprang the renaissance of English literature, so from men of Dayton’s day evolved the present school of scenic art, He painted great scenes. He put his brush to a white mass of canvas and behold, trees rustled in the breeze, mountains swam in the hazy distance, mosses clung to magnificent architecture, shapely columns and sweeping arches gleamed among cypress and cedar. His touch had magic in it; his color was sweet and harmonious – never jarring or gaudy. An artist who stands high in his profession, said to me not long ago, ‘If I could handle the difficulties of scenic art as Dayton once did, I should consider myself a master.’ One of the charms of Mr. Dayton was his unfailing cheerfulness. His life had its ups and downs, its smiles and tears, but through all, he never changed. In my long association with him I never heard him condemn. ‘If you can’t speak well of anyone, hold your tongue,” was his oft-repeated advice. He was born in New York city considerably over a half century ago. In his early youth he showed decided talent for his chosen profession. There is much that is somewhat obscure in his early days. A hint or two he let drop led me to believe that his first venture was a turn in a circus, but of this I am not sure. The first definite knowledge we have of him was when he was about eighteen years of age. Then owing to the undoubted talent he displayed he was installed as a scenic artist of the old Bowery theatre in New York. This position he filled for three or four years. When his marked ability became apparent, his services were in demand. After a prosperous career here, he was offered an engagement in the principal theatre of San Francisco, his salary being among the highest in those days, paid in gold. He, owing to his genial disposition and talent, was presented with a handsome gold watch in token of esteem. All artists are more or less nomadic; so later we find him holding positions in many of the principal cities of the country. He was in Chicago immediately before he came to Tyrone. About twenty years ago he became a member of the corps of artists in the studio of Wm. F. Wise & Co. Many remember some of the drop curtains he painted and how his ability was felt by all.  Now his eventual life is ended. When he lay upon his bed of death, his hands clasped by two of his friends, he looked up at us and with a flicker of his old time smile, joked even then, and after a pause, he turned to his wife and said, ‘I do not fear death.” There was no pain and he passed on a few days later into a calm and peaceful sleep. -A friend.”

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 875 – The Death of Walter W. Burridge

Copyright © 2019 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Walter W. Burridge. Undated newspaper clipping from the scrapbook of Thomas G. Moses.

Walter W. Burridge was a good friend and colleague of Thomas G. Moses. In 1887, they established the scenic art firm Burridge, Moses and Louderback, with well-known art dealer Walter Louderback. In 1914, Burridge died after sketching scenes of the Grand Canyon for two months. His work was part of the Santa Fe Railroad’s $300,000 exhibit for the Panama-Pacific Exposition in San Francisco. Many newspapers covered Burridge’s death and burial, but it was the “Brooklyn Daily Eagle” that provided a wonderful recount of his achievements (Brooklyn, NY, 26 June 1913, page 20). Although I have written extensively about Burridge in the past, this is a lovely summery of his life:

“WALTER W. BURRIDGE SCENIC ARTIST DIES.

Brooklyn Man Succumbs to Heart Disease at Albuquerque, New Mexico.

STOOD AT TOP OF PROFESSION.

Was Engaged on Big Contract for Panama Exposition When End Came.

Word was received in Brooklyn today, that Walter W. Burridge, one of the foremost scene painter of his time, has been found dead in a hotel in the little city of Albuquerque, N.M., yesterday. Death was attributed to heart disease super induced by acute indigestion. Mr. Burridge had just arrived in Albuquerque from the Grand Canyon, where he had been painting pictures for two months. He was 56 years old.

Walter Burridge was a Brookylnite, born and bred, and very well known as a painter of theatrical scenery. In 1903, he executed at the Academy of Music the largest scenery contract ever awarded to a scenic artist. $200,000 worth of scenery, including eighty complete sets and 300 hanging pieces, was turned out under his supervision. The work was done for Henry W. Savage, manager of the Castle Square Opera Company. Its most important feature was the preparation of special sets of scenery for each one of the operas in the Castle Square Opera Company repertoire. One of the pieces he completed was the magnificent storm scene in the first act of Verdi’s ‘Othello.” It was considered the piece de resistance of all the scenic effects ever produced at the Academy.

Mr. Burridge had, at one time or another, been associated with all the prominent actors and actresses in the country, among them Otis Skinner, Julia Arthur and Margaret Miller.

Mr. Burridge’s father, Henry, was the proprietor of the old Mason’s Arms Inn, on Myrtle Avenue, which was noted in its time as a resort for artists and actors. The leading lights of both professions met there frequently and the boy learned to know them well.

Young Burridge had a magnificent soprano voice and sang as a choir boy in St. Anne’s Church, the Church of the Redeemer, and St. John’s Church, where he was solo singer. His voice bade fair to connect him with the stage in another capacity than that of a scenic painter.

As a boy, Mr. Burridge helped produce the scenic waves at the old Park Theatre, by doing stunts on his hands and knees under a layer of canvas, The old theater carried with it many pleasing reminiscences for him. There he met Fred Chippendale and his wife. Later, at the Brooklyn Theater, which stood on the site of the present Eagle building, he was fortunate enough to attract the attention of Harley Merry, who was a great scenic artist of his day, He was apprenticed to Merry at the age of 13 and scored his first success by painting a water fall that had to be gotten out during his master’s absence.

Mr. Burridge did most of his work in the West. Thirty-five years ago, he painted many cycloramas. For the Philadelphia Centennial he painted the ‘Siege of Paris,’ and supervised the reproduction of the well-known ‘Battle of Gettysburg.’ He also executed a Government commission in Hawaii. He was sent there to paint a cycloramic picture of the great volcano, Kilauea, which was part of the Government exhibit at the Chicago World’s Fair.

Hugo Gerber, manager of the Lee Lash Studios at 1476 Broadway, Manhattan, who knew Mr. Burridge well, said today that he received a telegram from the West confirming the news of the death of Mr. Burridge. ‘His wife was with him at the time,’ he said. ‘Mr. Burridge had been working for us lately and had been sketching in the Grand Canyon. He was preparing some very important work there for the Panama Exposition, but I don’t know the details of it.

‘We expected Mr. Burridge to return East in a short time. The telegram we received was from his wife. It did not state the cause of death.

‘Mr. Burridge had done much big work for Klaw & Erlanger, but principally for Henry W. Savage. One of the last pieces of work he did was painting the scenery for ‘The Trail of Lonesome Pine.’ He was one of the most prominent scenic painter in the country.”

Burridge was survived by his wife, son Walter, two brothers, Cyril and Harry Burridge (New York and Marblehead, Mass.), and a sister, Miss Sarah Burridge (of Brooklyn). The loss of this artist in the prime of his career was immeasurable, a shock to the fine art and theatre worlds. He had so much potential and the Grand Canyon exhibit was to be one of the pinnacles of his career.

There is so much more to Burridge’s story and his accomplishments that I could not include in today’s post. However, I will end with a quote from Burridge in 1902:

“Did you ever stop to think,” said Walter Burridge, one of the best-known scenic artists in the country, “how the public says all kinds of nice things about some popular theatrical production and throws bouquets at everyone connected with it, except the man who painted the scenery? Of course the man doesn’t care a rap for fame. His soul is wrapped up in his work; he never comes before the gaze of the public, and never wants to. But at the same time, it is a curious fact that the scenic artist is an individual whose personality never becomes known to the public. If he paints a particularly beautiful scene it never fails to elicit round after round of applause. The people who are applauding, however, do not know who executed the painting, and they don’t care. It is pretty and that is enough for them.” When Burridge was interviewed by Chicago’s “Inter Ocean” on June 8, 1902, he was putting the finishing touches on the scenes that were to be used in the production “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” that was opening at the Grand Opera House the next week (page 42).

Walter W. Burridge with model of a theater design. Undated newspaper clipping from the scrapbook of Thomas G. Moses.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 874 – The Grand Canyon Exhibit for the Panama-Pacific International Exposition and Walter W. Burridge.

Copyright © 2019 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

During the summer of 1913, plans were announced for a Grand Canyon Exhibit at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition in San Francisco for 1915. Walter W. Burridge was hired to create a series of 100-feet long oil reproductions of the Grand Canyon. On June 25 1913, the “San Francisco Call” announced, “SANTA FE AT WORK ON GRAND CANYON EXHIBIT. Reproduction for Fair to Cost $300,000. Illusion Will Be Perfected by Canvases and Modeling.” The article reported, “Plans for the $300,000 reproduction of the Grand Canyon of Arizona, the exposition exhibit of the Santa Fe Railroad, were outlined yesterday by W. F. Sesser in a communication to the exposition company. Walter W. Burridge who will paint the canvasses, is on an extensive tour of the canyon with Mr. Sesser. The work will be made up of canvases and stone modeling. Rocks, trees, cactus and shrubbery have been collected for the model” (page 18).

Other newspapers soon included and an interview with Sesser of the exhibit:

“F. Fraser, manager of the Santa Fe exhibits, and who will have charge of the $300,000 reproduction of the Grand Canyon, of Arizona, at he Panama-Pacific International Exposition, in an interview, gives some interesting information about the construction of the exhibit. ‘In the production of this work,’ said Sesser,’I have had with me at the canyon Walter W. Burridge, one of America’s greatest painters; Charles R. Fisher, J. C. Schwerdt and a full equipment of guides and helpers. Captain John Hance, the hermit of the canyon, has been with us all the time. We have made studies at ten of the principal points of the canyon that will embrace in the exhibit we are to make the most grand and magnificent portions of the canyon. ‘We are gathering rocks, trees, cactus and shrubbery of all kinds from the rim of the canyon, which we will use in constructing the facsimile rim at the Grand Canyon exhibit. We will build a portion of Hermit trail, showing a trail party in motion, actual figures being constructed in correct position to accomplish this effect. In one section we will reproduce a storm in the canyon. We will also, in another section, have the effect of moonlight and sunset, with beautiful El Tovar hotel illuminated at night on the rim. ‘We are forwarding to San Francisco the first consignment of our studies in oil, pastel and water color, with color keps [?], color tones, dimensions, positions and the data necessary for the carrying out of the scheme. ‘I am going into the Indian villages, accompanied by Burridge and the rest of the party, for the purpose of making careful notes and studies of the Puebla life, as this will be an important feature, occupying the second floor of our front construction, In this part of the exhibit will be housed Hopi and Navajo Indian villages. Here the Indians will be engaged in their daily occupations, the same as in their original villages” (Victoria Daily Times, June 30, 1913, page 3).

A scene from the final display at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition in 1915.

Burridge traveled to Albuquerque after painting pictures for two months. He was found dead in his bed at the Alvarado hotel the evening of his arrival. Death was attributed to heart disease, caused by acute indigestion.  His widow received the news at the home of H. M. Smith, 438 Maple avenue, Oak Park, where she was a guest at he time. Burridge was only 56 years old and newspapers across the country reported, “His work of the Grand Canyon he had hoped to make the best of his career and fulfill his ambitions as a scenic artist.”

After his passing, the Santa Fe Railroad selected a another scenic artist, and friend of Burridge, to complete the paintings of the southwest – Edgar Payne.

Next summer, the exhibit was well underway. On August 27, 1914, the “Fergus Country Democrat” reported, “A panoramic reproduction of the Grand Canyon is being built at the Panama-pacific International exposition at a cost of over $300,000; over fifty thousand square yards of linen canvas, imported from Scotland, are being used for the set pieces. Visitors in this concession will view the panoramic from observation parlor cars, moved by electricity on an elevated trestle, seemingly along the rim of the canyon. The observer will be enabled to see eight of the most distinctive points of the canyon and the ride will last over half an hour, including, apparently, a journey of more than one hundred miles of the great gorge. Every resource of modern science is employed in the work of this production” (page 11). The “Joliet News” added, “The Grand Canyon concession is built upon so prodigious a scale that visitors will view the canvases from a standard gauge railway coach running on a standard gauge track” (Joliet, Illinois, 11 Feb. 1915, page 5).

Location of the Grand Canyon exhibit in the Zone at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915.
The Fred Harvey Collection at the University of Arizona includes wonderful photographs documenting the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915. Many are posted online.

When the World Fair opened, the Panama-Pacific attraction was located in the “Joy Zone” of the world fair. The “Peoples Easy Guide” described the attraction:

“Grand Canyon of Arizona

With an entrance like a typical railroad station of the Santa Fe in New Mexico, where we can seat ourselves in the tiny electric trains and be conveyed over mountain passes, through deserts and past villages till we reach the replica of the Grand Canyon of Arizona. Here we will descend and visit the Indian Colony, inspect the weaving of the Navajo blankets and the making of pottery and other crafts by the Indians brought here for the purpose.”  

Entrance to the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915.
Entrance to the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915.
Scene at the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915.
The Fred Harvey Collection at the University of Arizona includes wonderful photographs documenting the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915. Many are posted online.
The Fred Harvey Collection at the University of Arizona includes wonderful photographs documenting the Grand Canyon Exhibit at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, 1915. Many are posted online.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 801 – Universal Scenic Studio and the Abdallah Temple in Leavenworth, Kansas, 1922

Abdallah Shrine Scenery article in “The Leavenworth Times,” May 14, 1922.

On May 14, 1922, “The Leavenworth Times” reported that Universal Scenic Studio was creating new scenery for the Abdallah Shrine in Leavenworth, Kansas; both a permanent set for the space and a touring version when the Shrine visited other cities.

Here is the article in its entirety:

“’The Crescent is the official Shrine organ, published in St. Paul, Minn. A story in the May number of the publication, which follows, several of the special drops are described but the one that interests Leavenworth people the most and the one with which all are familiar, has been overlooked. This is the woods scene, taken from a photograph of Shrine Park, taken from the lake, looking south toward the bog dam that was constructed by the Fair organization. This scene is quickly recognized by all who have been inside the temple.

Of the other scenes, The Crescent, under the caption ‘Abdallah’s Stage Settings’ says:

It is safe to say that no Shrine temple in North America will possess more magnificent scenery for staging ceremonials that will Abdallah of Leavenworth, Kansas.

The Crescent man has viewed the scenic sets in the making, and if the Abdallah stage stuff is not

‘real class’ then Mohammed was a bum showman.

It just happens that the scenery is being made in St. Paul, where The Crescent mixes with the other saints and that Noble Boyd P. Joy is the man who is making it at Universal Scenic Studio, and those facts gave The man to take chance to see the stage equipment.

We wanted to say that before going ahead with this yarn, and to add that this story is being written, not as a paid advertisement, but as an appreciation of what is being done for Abdallah and her nobility to enjoy.

And that’s that.

Out of 4,000 yards of canvas and 4,000 feet of lumber, coupled with the many gallons of various colored paints, by artists who know their business, Noble Joy is creating reproductions of Meccas, the palaces and the Caliphs, and other views of equal importance to the story of the ritual.

Beginning with the asbestos curtain, showing an asbestos scene, every figure life size, and running through all the stages of the ritual scenes, are being made to fit the enormous stage out n Leavenworth, wit its 58-foot opening, and to truly present Arabic life on the desert as it is – or was when the Prophet was on earth. The asbestos curtain is simply enormous – it weighs half a ton. The picture runs through the entire width and height of the proscenium arch and shows the arrival of the caravan at the oasis at the hour of evening prayer. Over on the left is a low wall well and opposite it the followers of the Sheik appear to be busy in the formation of a camp while the chieftain of the tribe is kneeling on his prayer rug. In the distance appears the desert, with a glimpse of the pyramids showing through the haze. It is a splendid picture, and he wanted it without borders that usually are used to frame such a view – it stands out boldly for just what it is, an Arabic camp.

One cyclorama which must be all of 200 feet in length will encircle the stage, except across the front, while another complete stage setting includes a view of the sacred city from a minaret on the right. The tower has a balcony for the use of Muezzin, and on the opposite side are set pieces representing buildings along the street, with bazaars, etc.

The palace scene is made with set pieces, the drop at the rear being made to carry sliding doors. Through that opening the Potentate will make his entry.

The set pieces include tents, sphinxes, pyramids, palm and date trees, throne, and a whole mess of other things, and all so braced an arranged that they ‘stay put’ when required on stage, but can be quickly removed.

The Abdallah stuff really includes two complete sets of scenery, one for permanent use at the new Leavenworth mosque, and the other to be taken along when the temple visits other cities in the jurisdiction.

The scenery is to be loaded into a car and be delivered and place in the mosque not later than May 15, and from the amount of labor-saving machinery being used on the job, it will likely accomplish it.”

The Abdallah Temple was chartered March 28, 1887. In 1910 the Abdallah Shrine purchased the old Crawford Grand Opera House, originally erected in 1880. Located at the corner of Shawnee Street, south side, between fifth and sixth streets, it was extensively overhauled and became the well-known Shrine Temple until 1921. In 1921, a new Temple was erected on the lots just west of the original one. At a cost of approximately $200,000, the stage was an integral feature to the building with the new scenery from Universal Scenic Studio of St. Paul, Minnesota.

Postcard depicting the Abdallah Temple in Leavenworth, Kansas.

The Shrine was known as the playground of Freemasonry. After a Mason’s arduous study in the Blue Lodge (first three degrees of Freemasonry), he continued his study of the Craft in either the York Rite or Scottish Rite. This labor was a pre-requisite to joining the Shrine, although not any more.  However, even in 1921 there was an option if men didn’t want to take the time or money to join the York or Scottish Rite that culminated in the Shrine; they joined a the Grotto. For those Masons not interested in the continued study in the Scottish Rite or York Rite, the Mystic Order of the Veiled Prophets of the Enchanted Realm (M.O.V.P.E.R. Grotto) was an option and considered the “poor man’s Shrine.” Back to Leavenworth and Abdallah Temple.

1921, Abdallah membership reached 4,500 with its jurisdiction extending over nineteen counties in the northeastern part of Kansas. At this time, Abdallah Shrine maintained a band and a patrol unit at Leavenworth, with ceremonials held several times during the year; Abdallah events drew in large numbers of men from Leavenworth and the surrounding districts. The Abdallah Shrine even owned the park southwest of the city, formerly known as the Leavenworth County Fair Association Park. The park included bathhouses, a dancing pavilion, racetrack and other places of amusement, a perfect gathering location for Masons and their families.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 636 – John Bairstow and the Chicago Auditorium

Part 636: John Bairstow and the Chicago Auditorium

I have repeatedly mentioned the Chicago Auditorium in the past few posts. Here is a lengthy article about the theater that may help clarify its international significance. Tomorrow I will focus on the Chicago Auditorium’s stage carpenter, John H. Bairstow.

Postcard of the Chicago Auditorium

This Chicago Auditorium today

Interior of the Chicago Auditorium, 1890

Thie Chicago Auditorium

The Chicago Auditorium

 

On 7 December 1899, the “Chicago Tribune” published the article “The Auditorium Stage. A Revolution in Scenic Apparatus and General Equipment” (page 12). It is packed of absolutely wonderful details about the stage machinery and scenery. This is the theater that every single college student should encounter in theater history class. Unfortunately, this space was never discussed in any of my theater history throughout my BA, MA and PhD studies. Here is the 1899 article in its entirety:

THE AUDITORIUM STAGE.

A Revolution in Scenic Apparatus and General Equipment.

Twenty Hydraulic Rams by Which the Floor Can Be Raised of Lowered-Innovations Art All Old Idea-As Absolutely Fire-Proof as Anything Can Be Made-The Electrician’s Room a Study-Eleven Miles of Steel Wire Cloth-An Iron Curtain That Weighs 9,000 Pounds.

There are twenty hydraulic rams by which the entire floor of the Auditorium can be raised or lowered at will. There are fifteen traps, large and small, some extending over the entire width of the stage, which can be raised to represent elevations of be dropped to allow spirits to disappear. A goblin or fiend may shoot up as quick as lightning, or a ghost rise slowly into view. No need any longer to depend on the effects of an imperfect perspective and the occasional rock to represent the valley in which old Rip Van Winkle appears. A real valley can be produced on the stage by some ne on the stage floor touching a few brass handles and knobs, when the traps will rise or drop and give the desired elevations and depression. No need of any makeshifts to produce the impression of a ship at sea. H.M.S. Pinafore can appear rocked by waves, life size almost, and make the huge hydraulic rams oscillate to produce this motion it will take only the moving of some more brass handles on the stage floor.

What produces the remarkable stage effect in the background? It is no longer a level canvas on which perspective compels the painter to have a view toward the horizon narrowed. On the contrary, true to nature, the view expands as you look farther towards the horizon. The horizon consists of a semi-circular piece covering the background and running forward on the sides halfway to the curtain. The effect produced is as in a panorama. The painted part gradually approaches, and merges into, the adjacent parts of the real ground and objects. This horizon works a wonderful change in the appearance of the stage. It is movable. It runs on a track and is rolled around a perpendicular cylinder at the other end. It contains four kinds of weather so that be setting the rollers in motion a perfect effect of a change from fair weather to a dark, threatening sky, and finally the heavy clouds of a storm, can be produced. Transparent clouds will permit the effects of light, be it sun, or moon, or lightning, to be made from behind this horizon. The horizon looks pretty and airy, but weighs 5,800 pounds, including the counterweights.

AS COMPARED WITH OTHER STAGES

The trap arrangements, the movability of the entire stage, and the horizon are probably the most remarkable improvements that distinguish the Auditorium from all other stages, not only in this country but in Europe. It is to be the most completely equipped stage in the world, and will be in every respect, except size, the most perfect. There are only three other stages containing all the improvement that the Auditorium will have – namely: at Budapest, Prague, and the old German University Halle. Most of these innovations are the patents of the Asphaleia company of Vienna, or the firm of Kautsky & Sons, one of whom, Fritz Kautsky, has been here for a month superintending the construction. This system was selected by Architect Adler and Mr. John Bairstow after a careful examination of the systems of the principal European stages, and it is safe to say that the introduction of it by the Auditorium will cause a revolution in the scenic apparatus and general equipment of American theaters.

If there ever will be an absolutely fire-proof stage this one is probably the ideal. Everything is of iron and steel. There are no wings, the horizon makes them superfluous. There are no grooved running crosswise, suspended from the flies; the horizon dispenses with them. Side pieces of which there are an immense number, thirty-five to forty feet high are let down on stout wire ropes and pulled up again with ease. Everything, including the large cylinders and pistons for lifting the stage is moved by hydraulic power, the water being stored in huge tanks above the fifteenth story. The properties are stored away from the busy stage in large, convenient storerooms, There is no other than electric light. Rows of 990 colored globes run along the flies across the stage, forming the border lights, and by a touch of a little handle the most startling effects of light can be produced. The clumsy old calcium light process is at last completely wiped out. The electrician’s room is a study in itself. As it will require a most expert engineer and one of the highest ability to mange the apparently inextricable network of pipes, rods, rams, cylinders, pistons, and cables, so the electrician must be of the highest order obtainable in order to find his way through the wilderness of handles, knobs, and buttons in the little room on the stage floor behind the reducing curtain. He has to control 5,000 lights on the stage and in the house. In the like manner the engineer has to control eleven miles of steel wire cable and any number of rams, beside the iron curtain which weighs 9,000 pounds. But everything is so perfectly balanced by counterweights, and the hydraulic motors so admirably arranged, that a mere touch of the hand is sufficient to set in motion many thousands of pounds.

NO FLIES ON THIS STAGE

During the performance nobody will have to be in the flies. In fact there are no flies on the Auditorium stage. The side pieces – Mr. Kautsky calls them “walls” to avoid the term “wings” – are held up by steel ropes and propped up from behind. Almost 100 feet above the stage floor these “walls” are suspended ready for use. The artistic finish of all these pieces makes them worth looking at on their own account. Ordinary stage decorations are coarse when looked at closely, but in this case each piece is a picture in itself, so perfect that one might hang it in a parlor alongside a good oil painting.

About eight feet below the stage floor is another floor, which is in every particular an exact duplicate of the one above, each trap is raised on the stage floor to be used as an elevation of some sort, its place can be filled by the trap from the lower floor, s as to close up the stage floor. Beneath this lower floor is the basement, containing the hydraulic machinery, with a total pressure of six atmospheres. All scenery is operated from the stage floor.

Along the sides strong iron stairways lead to the top. An iron bridge extends across the proscenium just above the curtain, and along the background is the painter’s frame with two platforms, all suspended in steel wire cables. Near the top in the property room there is a force of artists at work now preparing the properties. Fawcett Robinson and his brother who used to be Henry Irving’s property artist are constructing the articles of papier-maché in such close resemblance of the genuine articles that at a distance of five feet one would take the tables and bookcases to be made of antique oak, and his copy of Thorwoldsen’s Venus looks at a distance of about ten feet like a perfect plaster cast. Mr. Robinson is an enthusiast in his work and his room alone is worth more than one visit to the Auditorium stage.

Not only is the apparatus for producing artistic effect so complete and varied that it will create an almost perfect illusion, but the convenience of the actors. Musicians, and workmen has been consulted to a hitherto unheard-of degree. The Diva need no longer receive callers on the stage.

MILWARD ADAMS’ NEAT IDEA.

A beautiful little reception-room has been provided-Milward Adams’ idea. The dressing rooms are comparatively large and commodious and provided with all conveniences. They are thirty in number, comparable of accommodating 300 people without crowding. The largest and best are on the stage floor, the others open off the landings along the iron stairways at the sides. The room where the musicians can be during the intervals of their work is as large as the orchestra pit, the prompter’s box commodious without being offensively conspicuous. A large covered court adjoins the rear of the stage for the reception of the actors and actresses in carriages or on foot. The stage manager has a convenient little room adjoining that of the electrician.

A magnificent plush curtain is covered by an iron curtain with a coat of plaster. The side borders are simply but tastefully decorated and display in letters of gold the names of a number of leading composers, classical and modern. The list comprises the names of Bach, Beethoven, Berlioz, Haydn, Schumann, Rossini, Mozart, Verdi, Gounod, and Glück.

Composers names are still visible at the Chicago Auditorium

Detail of composers names

The Chicago Auditorium today

FIGURES OF THE SCENIC APPARATUS

A few figures may assist in forming an estimate of the larger proportions and perfect construction of these scenic apparatus. The iron curtain weighs 9,000 pounds, exclusive of counter-weights; the reducing curtain, covered with plaster, weighs 23,000 pounds. The horizon is forty-eight feet high by 300 long. The contract for the iron work on the stage footed up $110,000, and the total equipment of the stage exceeds $200,000.”

[$200,000 in 1889 is equivalent in purchasing power to $7,388,771.25 in 2019. The cost of the entire building was $3,200,00.00]

The article concluded, “In the hall is to be used for other than theater purposes a level floor can easily be placed on the stage level, and the ceiling has a piece fastened by iron chains to windlasses which are hidden from view so that it can be lowered and shut the gallery out of sight.”

From the opening of the auditorium until after his partial retirement in 1905, John Bairstow would be in charge of raising the auditorium floor for special events. In 1910, the “Chicago Tribune” reported, “ John Bairstow is getting in trim for the one effort which claims his attention from year to year. Who is John Bairstow? Well, John Bairstow is the first stage carpenter, and from the beginning of the charity ball as an Auditorium function John Bairstow has laid the great dancing floor for the event. He has been doing this for twenty years and in the mind of John Bairstow no other carpenter, not even his own son William Bairstow, who has succeeded him as stage carpenter, may be entrusted with the duty. He retired from active work five years ago and this year he is far from the best of health, but already he is getting the numbered sections of the ballroom floor carefully arranged, mentally – as it will appear the night of Jan. 31 – for after every ball the floor – built originally at a cost of $10,000 – is taken up, its sections numbered carefully and stored away. This year thirty-seven boxes will be erected to add to the forty-five permanent stalls. The new boxes will be arranged four on either side beneath the organ grills, eight on each side of the stage proper, five around the rear wall of the stage, and eight at the west end of the ballroom. To get the theater in readiness a force of seventy-five carpenters and assistants will work two days and nights to complete the work” (22 Dec 1910, page 8).

I will continue with the life of stage carpenter John Bairstow tomorrow.

Sectional of the Chicago Auditorium

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 364 – “How Theatrical Scenery is Made,” 1898 (Physioc’s studio, part 1)

Part 364: “How Theatrical Scenery is Made,” 1898 (Physioc’s studio, part 1)

To fully understand the life and times of Thomas G. Moses, I am including a newspaper article describing a New York scenic studio from 1898. It provides great insight into the scenic art profession at the end of the nineteenth century. The article describes J. A. Physioc’s studio and his art. It was published in “The World” (New York, 6 March 1898, page 43). By 1899, Moses would also work in New York for Henry Savage at the American Theatre. Physioc was only one of many scenic artists whom Moses would compete with for work in the Big Apple. Here is a little background on Physioc to place him in context.

Joseph Allen Physioc (1866-1951) was born in Richmond, Virginia to J. T. Physioc. J. T. Physioc would later be listed as president of Physioc Studios, Inc., with his son and grandson as treasurer and secretary. The Physioc family moved to Columbia, South Carolina, when Joseph was four years old. Interestingly, one of Joseph’s childhood playmates was Woodrow Wilson (Tampa Times, 4 August 1951, page 2).

Physioc’s theatrical career started in small venues thoughout the south. He tried his hand in Alabama, and then headed to New York City after gaining some experience. He studied his trade at the Metropolitan Opera while working as an assistant designer (Index Journal, Greenwood, SC, 4 August, 1951, page 3).

By the age of 27, Physioc received a contract to stage Bernard Shaw’s “Arms and the Man” for Richard Mansfield at the Herald Square Theatre. His success with this play and others propelled him to rank among those at the top of his profession in New York. Physioc worked as Augustin Daly’s “house artist” at Daly’s Theatre in New York City and for twelve years traveled with Richard Mansfield as his “special artist.” Later in life, he moved to Columbia, returning to his family after his eyesight began to fail and he could no longer paint. In 1951, Physioc passed away at his son’s home (Joseph A. Physioc, Jr.).

Advertisement in Julius Cahn’s Official Theatrical Guide for Physioc Studio Co. from 1900.

I am posting this article describing Physioc’s studio and his artistic process during 1898 in four installments due to its length. It was the second line of the article that caught my eye when I was doing research, especially after delving into the histories of Strong, McDonald, and other scenic artists who belonged to the Theatrical Mechanics Association. The top scenic artists were also knowledgeable stage mechanics. Physioc was also an electrician.

Here is the first installment of the article:

“The studio of Physioc is a workshop as well. He says that no man can be a really successful scene painter unless he is also a stage mechanic. His success has made his opinion of value. He painted Daly’s and Mansfield’s scenery for years. The young man’s studio is a wonderful place. To begin with it is perhaps the largest in the world. It occupies the greater part of what was a five-story stable at No. 519 West Thirty-eighth Street.

The building was in the form of the letter U, Physioc filled the front with glass and roofed the open space with a skylight. You ascend to the studio by means of fire escapes on either side. Between them are suspended paint frames. The frames can be lowered forty feet. Four drops can be painted at one time. A cyclorama drop, that is, one which encircles the whole stage, ninety feet wide, can be painted without rolling. This is the advantage of the great space. The paint-bridge is always stationary.

Sectional of Physioc’s Studio from “The World” (New York, 6 March 1898, page 43).

Detail of Physioc’s Studio from “The World” (New York, 6 March 1898, page 43).

Detail of Physioc’s Studio from “The World” (New York, 6 March 1898, page 43).

In addition to the paint-bridge there are property rooms where all manner of things for the stage are made: the electric-light room, the model room and the miniature stage.

“Usually a scenic artist does nothing but paint,” says Physioc, “Yet he is held responsible for the whole setting and scene. The properties are very important accessories. Therefore I design and make them all. This insures a harmony, a completeness and accuracy which might be otherwise be lacking. I take it that the modern idea of stage scenes requires an artistic whole, a finished creation. I know exactly what the effect will be before a scene is painted.

I not only design the scene myself, but I make the accessories and arrange the lighting, which is almost as important as the scenery itself. I am not only a scene painter, but also function as the property man and electrician as well.

It is a strange and interesting art, this of scene painting. Time was when a painter made merely a drop and wings, or profiles. Now the scenic artist must make a composition. It is vastly different.”

This was 1898 and a crucial period during the development of degree productions for Scottish Rite stages in the Southern Jurisdiction. The scenery now used in Yankton, South Dakota, is from this same year.

1898 scene by Sosman & Landis Studio (Chicago) for Wichita, Kansas. This scenery is now in Yankton, South Dakota.

1898 counterweighted lines by Sosman & Landis Studio (Chicago) for Wichita, Kansas. This counterweight system travelled with the used scenery collection and was installed in Yankton, South Dakota. Photograph from November 2017 with Rick Boychuk when we examined the rigging.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 362: Thomas G. Moses’ and “Shenandoah” at McVicker’s Theatre

Part 362: Thomas G. Moses’ and “Shenandoah” at McVicker’s Theatre

Thomas G. Moses was the scenic artist at McVicker’s Theatre in Chicago during the 1897-1898 season. McVicker’s Theater was built by James Hubert McVicker in 1857. It was remodeled by 1864, then destroyed by fire in 1871. McVicker rebuilt and reopened the following year. By 1883, the venue was remodeled, but again destroyed by fire in 1890. For a third time, McVicker’s Theatre was rebuilt, reopening in 1892. In 1898, McVicker’s widow sold the theater to Jacob Litt for a term of ten years. Litt had managed the venue prior to becoming its proprietor. He hired Moses for his first season after purchasing the venue.

Jacob Litt purchased McVicker’s Theatre in Chicago during 1898. At this same time he hired Thomas G. Moses as his scenic artist for the venue.

Moses and Litt had worked together on other projects over the decades, including the Academy of Music in Milwaukee during 1886. Litt leased numerous theatres across the country and many endeavors became lucrative successes. By 1898, Litt said, “I have a hard time keeping the different companies straightened out as I have over 250 actors and actresses on my salary lists just now. I am going to make McVicker’s a producing house as much as possible” (Chicago Inter Ocean, 27 August 1898, page 6).

McVicker’s Theatre

At McVicker’s Theatre, Moses created the scenery for Litt’s grand revival of “Shenandoah.” The production was staged during the second half of the 1897-1898 season. Bronson Howard’s Military drama previously appeared at McVicker’s in 1890 and was reported to be “a phenomenal success” for this fort appearance. The Chicago Inter Ocean reported that with the second burning of McVicker’s Theatre in 1890, the “Shenandoah” scenery was “transferred to the Auditorium to complete its great run” (Chicago Inter Ocean, 28 Feb., 1897, page 37). The Chicago Tribune noted that “The play ‘Shenandoah’ did not suffer by the McVicker fire for, large as the audiences were during the 100 nights at the theater, they were almost as large again at the Auditorium” (31 August 1890, page 30). After the Auditorium, the show toured to St. Louis.

Advertisement for “Shenandoah” at McVicker’s Theatre (Chicago Tribune, 13 May 1898, page 5).

The 1898 “Shenandoah” production opened at McVickers during May and ran until the end of July. In June, the battle scene from the show was performed as part of the midsummer entertainment for a Chicago Press Club event. Smart idea. The Chicago Tribune reported that this entertainment was arranged “through the kindness of Manager Jacob Litt (5 June 1898, page 11).

Advertisement for “Shenandoah” published in the Chicago Tribune (7 July 1898, page 5).

In his typed manuscript, Moses described his painting of the “Shenandoah” settings in detail. He wrote, “For the production, Otis Skinner played the lead, supported by a full company with at least a dozen horses. We built up the stage for a big battlefield, and worked all other scenes inside of it. I couldn’t find an authentic picture of Shenandoah Valley, so I faked it. One night there was a crowd of old G.A.R. men and after the performance they asked my permission to go up on stage and look over the battlefield. Mr. Litt went with them and listened to their comments of the big cyclorama drop backing. They pointed out the very house where they all stopped for water, etc. Litt introduced me and afterwards said, ‘You made a big hit with those chaps with your accurate drop.’ I was pleased and told him it was a fake, that I just composed it. He could hardly believe it. Of course, I had some idea of the general character of the mountains and farmhouses.”

For me, it is fascinating to examine the personalities that Moses interacted with from year to year. His relationship with Jacob Litt is mentioned in installments #123, 216, and 255. He is a brief mention of Otis Skinner and where he was at in his career when he starred in “Shenandoah.”

Otis Skinner later became a popular film star.

Otis Skinner (1858-1942) was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts and raised in Hartford, Connecticut. His older brother Charles Montgomery Skinner became a noted New York theatre critic and journalist, while his younger brother William became an artist. Encouraged by P. T. Barnum, Skinner played various bit roles in stock companies during the 1870s until he built up his repertoire and began touring with Augustin Daly by the mid 1880s. In 1889 he was performing with the Edwin Booth and Helena Modjeska troupe. By the mid-1890s, Skinner became recognized as a star in his own right. It was during this period when Moses painted the settings for his show “Shenandoah.”

By November of 1898, “Shenandoah” began a return engagement at McVicker’s Theater. The Chicago Inter Ocean advertised that the production was “attracting an audience that crowded the house to its doors” (Chicago Inter Ocean 14 November, 1898, page 7). However the return engagement starred Maurice Barrymore in the leading role, not Skinner.

Advertisement for the return engagement of “Shenandoah” at McVicker’s theatre during November 1898, starring Maurice Barrymore. From the Chicago Tribune, 22 Nov 1898, page 5.

 

To be continued…

Defining a Panorama, Cyclorama and Diorama, by Gene Meier

A view of the cyclorama, Battle of Atlanta, by the American Panorama Company.

Many of my posts mention painted illusion for the stage and their connection to moving panoramas, cycloramas and other large-scale visual spectacles.  Today, I received an email from Gene Meier about defining panoramas, cycloramas and dioramas.  It is probably the easiest definition that I have ever come across and decided to pass it along.  It was written by Meier and simplifies something that is often confusing to many individuals.

From the pen of Gene Meier:

Writers attempt to explain what a panorama is to their readers and begin by saying “A panorama is a cyclorama…” Both terms mean “all around view.” “Panorama” is the term used in Europe and America. “Cyclorama” is used in America. This is how I introduce the subject to others: “A panorama is an inside-out diorama, and a diorama is an in-side out panorama.”  A (rotunda) panorama consists of a painted  circular canvas with foreground, middle ground and background, plus faux terrain (objects) to add to the tree-dimensional illusion.  A 3-D diorama (as opposed to a DIORAMA PAINTING)  consists of a main object (an up-graded “faux terrain”) and a painted panoramic background suggesting foreground, middle ground, and background.

Thank you, Gene!

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 281 – An American Warm Up, The Battle of Missionary Ridge

Advertisement for the American Panorama Company’s “Missionary Ridge” next to the Shiloh and the Battle of Gettysburg panoromas.

The American Panorama Company of Milwaukee created the Battle of Missionary Ridge panorama. It was mentioned in the “Bad Lands Cow Boy” (Medora, North Dakota, July 22, 1886, page 3). The article reported, “The Battle of Atlanta was chosen as the second subject for the artists brush, and with better acquaintance with each other, and a wider familiarity with the methods of warfare adopted in this country, and with the men who participated in the civil war, results have been accomplished in “Atlanta” which exceed those presented in any previous painted panorama.”

Text panel discussing battle locations and the landscape.

Stereograph from the Panorama of the Battle of Missionary Ridge, Union Troops Ascending the Ridge, American Panorama Company.

Stereograph from the Panorama of the Battle of Missionary Ridge, Union Troops Ascending the Ridge, American Panorama Company.

Stereograph from the Panorama of the Battle of Missionary Ridge, Union Troops Ascending the Ridge, American Panorama Company.

Here is what I find fascinating – they acknowledged the need for a warm up to better acquaint the immigrant artists with each other, all the while hoping to produce a truly monumental work of art. There was Wehner’s understanding that not all talented artists would work well together. Any type of paint studio needed to find a productive rhythm. That was as true then as it is true now. Wehner realized that many members of his newly formed immigrant staff had never worked together before. He obviously understood the potential for conflicts between individual skills, differing creative processes and artistic temperaments. Wehner needed a close-knit artistic community to ensure the success of the American Panorama Company and its anticipated project, The Battle of Atlanta. Otherwise, a quickly assembled staff could cost him time and money while he would be left to referee internal squabbles within his staff. The nuance of every artist’s technique needed to be fully explored prior to painting the Battle of Atlanta. Therefore, he created a warm-up project. Think of it as either spring training for baseball or making pancakes. The first pancake on the griddle may often flop. Just as the pan needs to reach the right temperature, a team of painters needs to warm up to each other to succeed.

There was also a blend of different ethnicities and languages in his studio. I have to wonder if English or German was there a common language. Was it necessary to have a common language at all? Having led an all-male paint crew in Japan, there is a certain amount of the artistic process that needs no verbal communication. A lot can be accomplished with pointing to a design, then the mixed paints, and finally pointing to a canvas or wall. Plus, these were all professionals, familiar with large-scale paintings and the necessary tools. As with F. W. Heine, most would have arrived with their own brushes in hand.

However, there is an entertaining tale that illustrates the art of communication in the American Panorama Studio. It is from “How A Great Panorama is Made,” an article by Theodore R. Davis, that was sent to me by Gene Meier. Remember, Davis was the individual who recorded many images of the Civil War and later worked for the American Panorama Company. As it deals with this particular cyclorama, it provides a little historical context and the dynamics in Wehner’s panorama studio.

To set up the story, Wehner does what many supervisors do – keep people busy. In many instances, I have tried to make sure that people remain working when they are “on the clock,” helping out with anything. The problem is to never get distracted and leave these people to their own devices. If you think that you have just assigned busy work, or something that is “fool proof” to screw up, think again. Learn from Wehner’s mistake.

Here is the excerpt from “How a Great Panorama is Made.”

“A portion of our picture, “The Battle of Missionary Ridge,” was left thus blank and bare, and was most disturbing to the German Professor who was chief artist. His eye so distracted and troubled by it that he one day directed some of the loitering models to take some color, “any color,” he said and “scumble over the surface to tone it down.” The models, dressed as Union and Confederate soldiers and officers, worked industriously for twenty minutes, when it was suddenly discovered that they had emptied three fifty-dollar cans of cadmium and were opening a fourth! A half-dollar’s worth of cheap house-paint would have been better, for no preparation had been used to make the cadmium dry, and it was still soft when the panorama was sent for exhibition in Chicago. What the artists said when they discovered the models’ mistake was not plain to me, as it was spoken in German; but I know that they all talked at the same time and very vigorously.”

This page shared by Gene Meier is from “How a Great Panorama is Made” by Theodore Davis who was on staff at the American Panorama Company. Published in St. Nicholas Magazine 1886-1887.

What is also fortuitous about this tale and the illustration was finding an almost identical sketch in the diary of F. W. Heine.

Sketch by F. W. Heine in his diary. This image is similar to the illustration “How a Great Panorama is Made” by Theodore R. Davis who was hired by William Wehner for historical accuracy of battle scenes in panorama.

Heine and Lohr were the two German professors at the American Panorama Company who were in charge of the projects and artists. They would later partner to create their own studio. It noticed the similarity as I was sending Meier photos of the Heine diary pages that I photocopied in 2013. There is something wonderful about sharing a discovery, only to learn something else new from him about the subject matter. Meier explained that the first unit of Battle of Missionary Ridge and Lookout Mountain was built on site in Cleveland. The second unit of Missionary Ridge was built in Milwaukee. He continued to explain that small waves of panorama artists were arriving from Germany and used George Peter as an example. Peter was told to first go to Cleveland to work on Missionary Ridge, then go to Milwaukee where the Battle of Atlanta was already under way. Missionary Ridge was truly a training ground used as an orientation for new members of Wehner’s paint staff.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 280 – The Battle of Atlanta Cyclorama

Advertisement from the St. Paul Globe, October 24, 1887, announcing the close of the Battle of Atlanta cyclorama.

The American Panorama Company painted the Battle of Atlanta. It opened in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and closed in 1887. In 1893, George V. Gress purchased the attraction and it has remained in Atlanta ever since. In 1919, an amendment to the Atlanta city charter approved the construction of a building to house the massive artwork that was reported as weighing 9,000 ponds. The structure was designed by architect John Francis Downing and dedicated on October 1, 1921.

The cyclorama building in Atlanta, Georgia.

In 1936, a three-dimensional foreground was added to the painting in Atlanta. A mannequin of Clark Gable from the movie “Gone with the Wind” was also included by 1939. In 1979 the painting underwent conservation, reopening to the public in 1982.

This particular cyclorama is near and dear to me. In 2002, I traveled to Atlanta to assess the condition of the Scottish Rite scenery collection.

Atlanta Scottish Rite scene for the 17th degree, 2002.

Detail from the Atlanta Scottish Rite scenery, painted in 1959-1960 by Maj. Don Carlos DuBois. His original designs are available online int he scenery collections database (University of Minnesota Performing Arts archives).

While I was in town, I visited the Battle of Atlanta Cyclorama with Larry Hill. Hill was one of the theatre professors who accompanied Lance Brockman and Rhett Bryson on many adventures as they crossed the country to document Masonic scenery. The three paved the pathway for my own research and restoration projects. When Larry and I visited the cyclorama we went behind the scene and was slightly astounded at how it had been repaired and conserved. I remember thinking at the time, “Well, interesting choice; hope it never has to move.” It has since moved, the website lists the exhibit as “permanently closed,” but is supposedly undergoing conservation. Here are two tales for your perusal: http://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/explore/destinations/atlanta-cyclorama and http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/08/us/atlanta-cyclorama-big-painting-move-trnd/index.html

The Battle of Atlanta was described in detail in the “Bad Lands Cow Boy” (Medora, North Dakota, July 22, 1886, page 3) reporting, “The magnificent panorama of one of the bitterest fights of the Civil War “ was on exhibition in Minneapolis. A great circular building had been erected for the panorama.

The article continued, “The word panorama conveys to the mind of one who has not seen one of these great pictures, but a faint idea of the effect secured by a combination of art and nature. The common idea of the effect secured by a combination of art and nature. The common idea of a panorama is that of a series of moving scenes. The modern war panorama differs radically from this commonly accepted idea. Instead of a series of views the spectator is translated by an ingenious device to a point of observation which enables him to command the entire field and wide expanse of country. The huge painting is hung around the walls of the great circular building, and the spectator is practically placed in the very center of a great landscape stretching away in “Atlanta” to from fifteen to twenty miles in every direction. No description which can be given of one of these wars paintings can convey to the initiated mind any idea of their effect. Ingenious as is the idea it is not one of American origin. The first of these panoramas was painted in Europe as long ago as 1810, and now in every European city of importance some famous battle scene is depicted in one of these war pictures.”

The author of the article explains that there was an interest in depicting battles of the Civil War, especially after Gen. Ulysses S. Grant’s book and a series of stories from officers published in Century Magazine. Interestingly, a signed copy of his book is in the Minnesota Masonic Heritage Center Library. I inventoried it as the Curatorial Director after moving the 10,000 piece acquisition from the St. Paul Scottish Rite during 2015.

Responding to the public enthusiasm in the nineteenth century, William Wehner decided to prepare a panorama with “a series of correct paintings which should have both artistic merit and positive historical value.” Wehner also hired Theodore R. Davis who was a war artist for Harper’s Weekly and possessed a rare collection of sketches of all the principal battles of the Civil War, as well as “a marvelous memory of the events and men.” There were more than twenty thousand figures included in the Battle of Atlanta. Blending in with the two-dimensional composition were also many dimensional items that included trees, mounds of earth, a stream of water, a railroad track, a smoldering campfire, a simmering pot of water, and other physical props.

American Panorama Company artists in front of the Battle of Atlanta. Image form the Wisconsin Historical Society.

As the cyclorama building was being completed, the artists were preparing the compositions, and sketching details that would later be transferred to the canvas. The landscape artists were studying the characteristics of the fields to be depicted, while the portrait and figure painters were occupied in “traveling north and south studying the types of faces.” The article reported “A vast collection of weapons and accouterments, all paraphernalia of war was gathered in the studio at Milwaukee before the task of painting was fairly commenced.”

There are many pictures of the cyclorama and I am attaching only a few for a simple sense of history and scale.

The Battle of Atlanta in its previous home.

Detail of the Battle of Atlanta when it was installed in the cyclorama building.

Detail of the Battle of Atlanta when it was installed in the cyclorama building.

To be continued…