Fabric Walls and Sets – Drypigment.net

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1146 – The Fad for Fabrics, 1922

In 1922 Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Our work has been running fabrics, so much so that I have no notion to make on painting…We that paint, as well as design, frown upon the new fad for fabrics. We trust it will soon die out and we will all return to the old way of painting with up-to-date designs.”

Moses must have sensed that the situation would not change anytime soon, and he would be too old to profit from any future scenic art revival. In hindsight, he was at the wrong age, in the wrong profession, in the wrong location, and at the wrong time. In 1922, Moses was 66 years old. He passed away in 1934. In that twelve-year period, his health continued to decline and the stock market crashed, forever putting the death nail in the coffin for many scenic artists at the time. Although Moses’ mind was still sharp, his body was deteriorating, and work was rapidly drying up.

Scenic art techniques continued to shift in the 1920s, as the demand for scenic illusion on stage plummeted, accommodating ever-shifting designs and products. Many scenic artists saw the writing on the wall, and rapidly tried to adapt to the changing times. Moses was not one of them.

In 1923, Moses continued to worry about the decline of painting projects. That year he wrote, “Very little painted scenery for the vaudeville acts is being done, mostly fabrics, and if the wage scale keeps on, I don’t see where the artists are going to find enough painting. They will have to become dressmakers and learn to sew on sateens and velours. A few of the old melodramas would be very welcome.”

In 1923, Sosman & Landis also closed their doors, liquidating all of their assets. Moses and Fred Megan purchased the Sosman & Landis name, but it was too little too late. The live entertainment industry was slowly shifting from painted draperies to ornate textiles. If a scenic artist had not side-stepped into a compatible industry, it was almost too late to make a successful change. Yes, there was still a demand for painted scenery in the motion picture industry, Masonic theaters and other performance venues, but not at the previous scale.

Although a few big painting projects continued to appear on the horizon in the Midwest, the constant stream of opportunities slowed to a trickle. By 1925, Moses and Megan were running the new iteration of Sosman & Landis, constantly searching for work. That year, Moses wrote, “Megan left for the south where we have several good prospects, but I presume they will be chiefly draperies.” John Hanny, a one-time Sosman & Landis scenic artist and founder of Chicago Service Studios, wrote “About this time it was becoming evident that scene-painting, as such, was on its way out. Almost every Artist automatically was becoming a freelancer, picking up odd jobs perhaps a day or two here and there – ‘touch ups’ and the like.” It was the wrong time to own a scenic studio, one specializing in painted illusion.

In an undated letter to Dr. John H. Rothgeb at the University of Texas (c. 1980), Hanny described the decline of painted scenery during the 1920s and 1930s. Hanny began work as a scenic artist at Sosman & Landis in 1906; Moses was the one to hire him that year. By 1920, Hanny and four others established Service Studios of Chicago, a competing firm to their previous employer. Service Studios did not last and quickly became ACME Studios.

Of scenic art after the market crash, Hanny wrote:
“The depression of 1929 just about stopped the production of stage scenery – at least in Chicago. Road shows, musicals, etc., if any, were being produced in New York and Hollywood. At this point all the Studios disappeared, but the scene painters just couldn’t disappear and had to become free lancers. There was no such thing as a steady job and the boys were hard put to find a day’s pay. Most of the following 10 years were really tough and 1929 proved to be a big change in our business, in purpose, in design, paint and other materials. As the economy slowly improved – work was to be had on industrial exhibits, Home shows and Auto shows, etc. These were contracted for by such firms as Bromels Detroit, Dramaturgy Cleveland, Wildings Chicago and a few others. These were not Scenic Studios but rather combinations of carpenter and machine shops equipped to turn out booths, revolving turn-tables, electrical effects, and so on. The artwork was done in any available loft or vacant store space. The biggest change to us painters was our paints. Luminal Casene [sic. Luminall Casein] was pretty well established as a very practical and useful medium so, it, and show card color was the norm. So – no more ‘dry’ colors – no more soup bowls or hot size and of course no more paint frames. Drapes, if any were painted on the floor. The house painter’s sash brushes came into use and many of the former ‘tools’ such as snappers, and center-poles and others were no longer needed. The folding 2 ft. brass bound rule gave way to the yard stick.”

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1140 – P. T. Blackburn and the Fabric Studio of Chicago

In 1922 Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Started on a bunch of Masonic models, and it will take some time to do them. Went to Joplin, Mo., after a good contract. Was too high.” A similar thing would happen only a few months later, with Moses writing, “Made several trips to Davenport in hopes of getting the big contract of about $16,000.00, but we were too high.

*Stencil for the Fabric Studios for the Joplin Scottish Rite*

*Scenery by the Fabric Studios for the Joplin Scottish Rite*

Painted detail. *Scenery by the Fabric Studios for the Joplin Scottish Rite*

Sosman & Landis was nearing the end of its existence at the same time many other studios were getting their start. Sosman & Landis lost the Joplin job to another Chicago firm – The Fabric Studio. The Fabric Studio appeared on the scene as abruptly as it disappeared a few years later. However, between 1922 and 1923 the studio showed much promise. The same year that they landed the Joplin Scottish Rite project, they delivered some very impressive scenery to the Orpheum Theatre in Wichita, Kansas. Interestingly, by 1923, Thomas G. Moses and Fred R. Megan rented the Fabric Studios’ space as they waited to purchase the Sosman & Landis name; waiting for the firm to liquidate all their assets.

The Fabric Studio scenery painted for the Joplin Scottish Rite is colorful, impressive, and indicative of a changing aesthetic. I had an opportunity to visit the Joplin Scottish Rite and document the historic scenery collection during the summer of 2018 and document the scenery painted at the Fabric Studios. Here is link to my post about that visit: https://drypigment.net2018/07/03/travels-of-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-the-joplin-scottish-rite-july-2/

There was a studio stamp on many drops that included the address 117 N. State, 4th floor, Chicago, Illinois. At this time, there were three main individuals running The Fabric Studio, artistic director P T. Blackburn and stage carpenter J. A. Bannon. As most young studios, the men continued to work independently while getting the studio up and running. In the end, the Joplin Scottish Rite may be the only artistic legacy left of this short-lived studio.

The earliest mention of the Fabric Studio that I have located to date is from the summer of 1921. The company placed a want ad in the “Chicago Tribune,” advertising for girls to help in their sewing room (“Chicago Tribune,” 27 August 1921, page 14). The earliest work credited to the new form was for Princess Minstrel Misses. Advertisements placed in “The Richmond Item” announced, “Seven young ladies in ‘a Fanfare of Joy, Song and Dance and Music’ with Cecil Jefferson. A miniature minstrel production offered exclusively by seven talented girls with an elaborate stage setting. Hear these clever girls in the latest songs and jokes. Costumes by Hazel Rene, Chicago. Scenery by The Fabric Studio, Chicago. 20 minutes of Real Entertainment” (8 Dec 1921, page 5).

In 1922, The Fabric Studio of Chicago was competing with the Kansas City Scenic Co. for the contract to paint and install a new front curtain and scenery for the Memorial Auditorium in Wellington, Kansas. W. S. Mayer was the salesman for The Fabric Studio of Chicago (“Wellington Daily News,” 25 August 1922, page 1). That same year, The Fabric Studio also secured a substantial contract for Wichita’s Orpheum Theatre. The “Wichita Eagle” reported the Fabric Studio’s scenery included the original asbestos curtain depicting a gold gauze curtain with an exterior garden scene, a Spanish market scene; a silk velour for the valance; a grand drapery; a silver gauze tableaux curtain; a picture sheet; “two exterior oleos and drops;” a complete conservatory set; and a complete Gothic set (3 September 1922, page 48).

*The Orpheum Theatre in Wichita, Kansas with scenery by the Fabric Studios of Chicago*

*P. T. Blackburn, from the “Daily Times,” Davenport, Iowa, 17 May 1922, page 10.*

The chief scenic artist associated with the Fabric Studios at this time was P. T. Blackburn. He is quite an interesting individual. Blackburn was the head of the artistic staff for several stock companies over the years, including the Grand Players from Davenport, Iowa. Max Schroeder was another scenic artist who represented painted for the firm 1922, specializing in landscapes. Blackburn and Schroeder greatly contributed the studio’s colorful aesthetic. The firm’s head installation expert was J. A. Bannon, an older gentleman with extensive experience with stage machinery and the installation of stage systems.

Blackburn was credited as specializing in fine plushes, satins, and velours, such as the gold gauze front curtain and the silver gauze tableaux curtain for the Orpheum. Of the gold curtain delivered by the Fabric studio. The “Wichita Daily Eagle,” reported, “Scenery in the Orpheum theater ranks with that any vaudeville theater in the entire country, according to J. A. Bannon, who came to Wichita from Chicago, to install the scenery for the Fabric Studio, the makers. Bannon should be an authority since he is an old timer in the show business and has installed scenery in theaters in nearly every city in the United States. Bannon is very enthusiastic about the gold gauze curtain which he says is an unusually fine production. It portrays an exterior garden scene and was painted by Max Schroeder. A wonderful work has been accomplished in the floor perspective of the scene in the curtain. The perspective is only twenty-five inches in extent but gives the floor appearance of being twenty-five feet.” Of Bannon, the article reported, “Bannon started ‘trouping’ as a property man with Karafe’s Water Queen in the eighties. He soon became stage carpenter and traveled as such for years, visiting Wichita many times.”

In 1923, the “Quad City Times” include a portrait of Blackburn and reported, “Mr. Blackburn, scenery artist at the Grand theater is a star never seen by the audience. All of the scenery is painted by him. ‘It is an endless job – this business of being a scenery painter of a stock company – but I like it anyway,’ opined Mr. Blackburn yesterday, He had been with the Grand company for more than a year” (18 March 1923, page 21). In 1923, Blackburn was also producing scenery for productions, such as “Nice People” in 1923 (The Daily Times, Davenport, Iowa, 27 Jan 1923, page 8). Blackburn was mentioned as a scenic artist when he married in 1923 (The Daily Ties, 21 April 1923, page 7). The article announced, “Miss Erma Hermiston, youngest daughter of Mrs. Fred Hanson of DeWitt, was married to P. T. Blackburn, scenic artist for the Grand Players, now appearing at English’s Opera house, Indianapolis. Mr. Blackburn has for over a year and a half been artist for the company during the stay at the Grand in Davenport. Both he and his bride, who had made her home in this city, are very well known. The wedding took place at the First Presbyterian church, Rev. Milner officiating.” The couple was listed in the Colorado Divorce index on Sept 3, 1930.

By 1931, Blackburn was credited with the settings for Loew’s and Paramount’s “Lysistrata” ( “Los Angeles Record,” 28 Dec 1931, page 8). He also did the sets for “Shanghai Gesture” (Los Angeles Evening Express, 1 Sept 1931, page 10). In 1932 he was noted as a “well known Hollywood stage designer and artist,” associated with the comedy “Just Married” (Honolulu Star 7 July 1932, page 8). By 1949, Blackburn was the head artist for Paramount Studios and a weekend resident of the San Jacinto mountain resort area (“The Desert Sun,” Palm Springs, California, 17 May 1949, page 4). In addition to scenic art, Blackburn and his department also developed new stage equipment and curtain tracks for scenery painted by Paramount artists.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 959 – Musical Acts, 1917

In 1917, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Another ‘Katz’ show, $1,050.00, and one vaudeville act from Brazee $300.00, and one from Banda Rosa for $445.00, a big act.”

Yesterday, I explored J. C. Brazee’s production of “The Honey Bees” with scenery by Sosman & Landis. Today I am looking at “Banda Rosa.” Moses was referring to Signor Guiseppe Sirignano’s “Banda Roma” that toured the country with thirty-five musician and soloists during the early twentieth century.

Banda Roma pictured in the “San Francisco Call,” 11 Jul, 1909, page 40.

Sirignano was later noted as “the former musical dramatizer of Ziegfeld and Fine-Arts Theatres, Chicago, and of the Banda Roma” (Des Moines Register, 9 Oct. 1918, page 10). Sirignano’s Banda Roma also performed music for silent films. For “Cleopatra,” his 15-piece orchestra played a special overture.

This brings up another type of client for Sosman & Landis – musicians. Many musical acts ordered decorative and distinct scenery for their touring productions. This demand also drove a new aesthetic for the stage during the second and third decade of the twentieth century. There was no need to have traditional scenic art provide the backing for a band, or musical vaudeville act.

Photograph in sales book from Acme Studio of Chicago, Illinois.

Decorative painting of specialty fabrics became increasingly popular. Instead of providing a series of painted layers on cotton sheeting that suggested an exterior or interior setting, musical acts used a series of decorative layers that simply suggested a subject, and not realistically represented. There were no cumbersome bottom battens that stretched scenes taut, just fabric suspended from any system. In many ways, this type of painting was intended to work with fabric that would bunch.

Detail of photograph in sales book from Acme Studio of Chicago, Illinois.

The painting of fabric was popular at many new firms, such as the Service Studios, the Fabric Studios and Acme Studios in Chicago. Studio sales books began to include an increasing number of these decorative scenes for clients. The use of stencils created an interpretive view for both exteriors and interiors. These soft goods were easy to transport and hang. Many were even interchangeable.

The downside was that this type of painting was that it altered the type of labor required to staff a shop; these projects did not require the same skill set as those realistically painting a subject. The use of repetitive patterns and stencil work was quickly taught and did not necessitate years of study or training. Aspects of the scenic industry became a craft, with many projects requiring artists with minimal skill sets.

I look at some of the curtains with stylized donut-shaped flowers, hundreds of them throughout compositions, thinking about the basic instruction:

“Bob, they don’t need to be perfect, they just need to be little circles with dots in the center. Just do your best and paint as many as possible. Remember, it ships tomorrow.”

Detail of donut flowers. Photograph in sales book from Acme Studio of Chicago, Illinois.

Detail of stylized leaves and flowers. Photograph in sales book from Acme Studio of Chicago, Illinois.

Foliage painting for stylistic scenes demanded very little from an artist. Instead of building up mass on a branch, there was just repetitive pattern. What once destroyed scenic illusion was now popular.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 884 – Real Fabric Walls, 1914

Stage designs that highlighted the technical skill of the scenic artist began to shift during the second decade of the twentieth century. A new vision and stage aesthetic began to appear; one with the increased use of draperies and three-dimensionality objects. New lighting accentuated this type of setting, taking on its own importance. By the 1920s, the demand for beautiful painted visions of pictorial landscapes continued to diminish, an in its stead were a variety of abstract interpretations that defined the stage space. Contrasting fabrics with minimal paint application suggested interior and exterior settings rather than replicating them. In some cases, curtains even replaced cumbersome flats for interior walls, with only the use of a fireplace, window or door.

Traditional interior setting, advertised in the Service Studios sales book. Service studios was established in 1920, and later acquired by ACME Studios, also of Chicago.

Backside of Service Studios photograph, ca. 1920-1925. The company was acquired by ACME Scenic Studios in 1926.

Real fabric interior setting, advertised in the Service Studios sales book. Service studios was established in 1920, and later acquired by ACME Studios, also of Chicago.

Exterior setting with real fabric and minimal painted illusion, advertised in the Service Studios sales book. Service studios was established in 1920, and later acquired by ACME Studios, also of Chicago.

I explored the popular production and setting of “Daddy Long Legs” prior to the holidays. In 1914, Thomas G. Moses recorded that Sosman & Landis delivered scenery for the production. Of the stage setting, he wrote, “It was a very delicate interior, real fabric walls.”

There are two ways to look at Moses’s comments: “real fabric walls.” The first is the use of fabric panels as in residential homes. In that regard, fabric panels were falling out of favor for home use by 1914. Newspaper articles reported, “Not so many years ago the walls of the boudoir would have been silk panelles, but sanitary specialists have pronounced fabric covered walls uncleanly abiding places for germs” (New York Tribune, 6 May 1914, page 7). It is possible that the “delicate interior, real fabric walls” referred to the use of actual draperies on stage, another type of setting that was gaining popularity on the stage by 1914. Real fabric walls for interior settings instead of painted backdrops or flats.

Artistically patterned and draped fabrics were becoming a popular alternative for painted backdrops, both exterior and interior sets at this time. Scenic studio sales books would promote this cost-effective trending interpretation for modern stage settings. This is where scenic art quickly becomes a craft, requiring a different skill set. The once thousands of painted settings that created scenic illusion for a variety of entertainment venues begin to disappear. Delicate landscapes painted with skilled hands give way to contrasting fabrics and minimalist stencil work to suggest a setting. It was new, fun, more versatile for the stage, and in many cases cheaper.

Like other studios of the time, the Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio was not simply a firm that specialized in painted backings; they manufactured all types of settings, draperies and stage equipment for differing entertainment venues. It was this diversity that helped the company expand over the decades, being able to offer a variety of products and services for all types of stages. The mention of fabric walls for a setting, instead of hard covered flats, was a cheap alternative that could be quickly manufactured and shipped to any stage in a matter of days, not weeks. No complex rendering or skilled scenic artist was necessary to create this popular stage setting.

Scenic art branches off into two separate directions at this point: increased realism for the film industry and diminished realism for live theatre. Scenery for many films became increasingly realistic, tightening the scenic art style and application of paint for cycloramas. On the other hand, live theatre was moving in the opposite direction, broader strokes and non-traditional approaches to interior settings. The manufacture of scenic illusion, for projects other that moving pictures, diminishes to such an extent that many studios no longer require a full staff of highly-skilled scenic artists. The hiring of craftsmen becomes a prudent option, as painted illusion was no longer required for every project. By the 1920s, many master painters could be hired on a per project basis. This also allows room for new studios to open across the country, replacing many of the main studios that heavily relied on a legion of high-skilled scenic artists. The painting work is still there, but the demand had decreased.

Fortunately for Sosman & Landis and other well-established studios, certain social halls, fraternal theaters and other public spaces continued to demand painted illusion for the stage.

To be continued…