Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Chicago, Sept. 12-23, 2024

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

My return from the UK on August 12 was relatively uneventful – at first. Sadly, four days after my return I became quite sick – a sore throat quickly became a severe respiratory infection. Although I never tested positive for COVID, this particular illness confined to me to bed for over two weeks.

That is the reason why there was a flurry of posts about my UK trip mid-August. Researching a handful of English scenic artists and historic venues prevented me from worrying about all of the projects that needed to be completed by Sept. 12.

The initial delay had started well before my departure to the UK. In June, our basement flooded (water heater burst – destroying the flooring in our master bedroom, laundry room, and my research office). Thankfully, nothing of consequence was damaged. However, this unfortunate event caused a series of delays, each one falling like a Domino.

Despite the ongoing delays and my continued illness, I still had a show to finish in August, an annual family trip (Labor Day weekend), and a 31st wedding anniversary (Sept. 11).

Thank God I paint fast. 

I only had one backdrop left for Tamerlano (Haymarket Opera Company, Chicago), but it was a complicated composition with lots of ornamental detail. As my illness dragged on, it became a guessing game of “Can I paint this drop in — days?”  In the end, it took me three partial days, and I felt horrible with each brush stroke. The only thing that would have made this worse is if I had been painting in the Continental method. Fortunately, I was using a motorized paint frame. That meant I could minimize my overall movement.

Here is a picture of the finished Tamerlano backdrop (front and back). It was painted with distemper paint (pigment paste and diluted hide glue), and designed to function as a translucency, so it could subtly “glow” upstage.

Front (right) and back (left) of Tamerlano backdrop for Haymarket Opera Company, Chicago.

On Sept. 12, 2024, I drove to Chicago with a carload of scenery for Haymarket Opera Company’s fall production Tamerlano (George Frederic Handel, 1724). The production was scheduled to coincide with the 300th anniversary of the premiere.

A carload of Tamerlano scenery on September 12, 2024.

As noted on their website, Haymarket Opera Company takes its name from both Chicago’s Haymarket Affair of 1886 which gave focus to the world-wide labor movement, and from the King’s Theatre in the Haymarket District of London where Handel produced his Italian operas. Their website states, “Haymarket Opera Company contributes to the diverse and culturally vibrant artistic community of Chicago and the Midwest through the historically informed presentation of opera and oratorio from the 17th and 18th centuries, including many Chicago and U.S. premieres. Since its founding in 2010, Haymarket has offered more than 30 productions using period instruments and historically informed staging conventions, shining a spotlight on many lesser known but quality pieces by a wide diversity of composers, sung and played by a combination of international stars and top regional talent.”

My earliest conversations with Haymarket Opera Company in 2021 discussed the creation of a stock scenery collection. Our intent was to slowly build scenic stock, one show at a time. The scenic design for L’Amant anonyme (June 2022), established our stylistic approach and paint medium.

Painted detail from L’Amant anonyme’s grand border. Haymarket Opera Co., 2022.
Painted detail from L’Amant anonyme’s landscape drop. Haymarket Opera Co., 2022.

We agreed that all the shows would be painted with distemper paint (picgment paste and diluted hide glue), as it truly supports the metamorphic nature of painted illusion for the stage.

Tubs of dry pigment paste that were used during the painting of L’Amant anonyme. May 2022.

I have continued to enlarge Haymarket’s stock scenery collection over the past few years with classical settings for Poppea (September 2022) and Egyptian décor for Marc’antonio e cleopatra (June 2023).  Tamerlano (September 2024) combines elements from each production, while adding Eastern tapestries and an Eastern courtyard setting to the stock.

Painted drapery panels used for Haymarket Opera Company’s production of Poppea, September 2022.
Adding decorative ornament to Poppea drapery panels. They functioned as side masking for Tamerlano.

For example, painted ornament was added to six Poppea wings, functioning as a unifying element between the newly-painted Tamerlano draperies with previously-painted L’Amant anonyme tapestries. New elements for this production include a backdrop, top border, two side wings, two tormentor covers, and four rolling profile pieces.

Painted draperies for Tamerlano to match scenic elements from Poppea and L’Amant anonyme.

Haymarket Opera Company uses the Sasha and Eugene Jarvis Opera Hall at DePaul University. This building was formerly known as the School of Music Concert Hall, located at the south end of the Holtschneider Performance Center. It was recently renovated, reopening during the pandemic in 2020. Bad timing, as stag-house issues really were not identified until well after the install, when pandemic-related restrictions were lifted.

Champagne toast on opening night, Tamerlano, September 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.

The auditorium, however, is perfect. The 160-seat house creates an incredibly intimate space for Baroque opera.

Haymarket Opera Co. Tamerlano, Act I. September 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.
Haymarket Opera Company’s Tamerlano, Act I. Sept. 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.

The stagehouse is a very challenging space, and I constantly curse the theatre consultants. Scenery cannot travel out of site, the wings are less than 6’-0” wide, and every line-set is motorized.  There are only a few open lines. For substantial set changes, soft goods are rolled and tied to battens, then slowly lowered during intermissions

Assistant Stage Manager, Mary Rose Dixon (left), and Stage Supervisor, Zoe Snead (right), unrolling painted panels for Act II, Tamerlano. Sept. 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.
Haymarket Opera Company’s Tamerlano, Act III. September 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.

 All difficulties aside, the Jarvis Opera Hall is a stunning venue to visit and watch a production. Tamerlano opened on Thursday, Sept. 19 and closed on Sunday, Sept. 22. A short run, but each performance was sold-out, and the show was recorded.

The cast and creative team taking a final bow. September 19, 2024. Photograph by Elliot Mandel.

As each Haymarket opera loads in easily, and without substantial notes, I have ample time to explore Chicago during the day. My adventures always include a dear friend – Chicago Lyric Opera charge artist, Brian Traynor. In the past we have visited cemeteries, history centers, and historic buildings.  Last year, Traynor introduced me to Bernard Loyd and we visited The Forum in Bronzeville (a neighborhood on the south-side of Chicago). On July 18, 2023, Brian Traynor sent me a photograph with the text, “Guess what I’m looking at.” It was a Sosman & Landis signature on the corner of a, 1897 drop curtain.

Sosman & Landis signature on 1897 Forum Hall drop curtain.

I examined the drop curtain in person on Sept. 28. 2023. CLICK HERE for my full post about out visit. Our visit last year was documented by Block Club Chicago journalist, Jamie Nesbitt Golden, and photographer Colin Boyle.  CLICK HERE to read her Block Club Chicago article. 

This scenery collection was also the topic for my article published in Die Vierte Wand #012, entitled, “A Forum for Progress.” CLICK HERE for the full issue.

Traynor and I returned to The Forum this year on Sept. 19, 2024. I was supervising the proper rolling and storage of the Forum’s scenery collection . This meant removing the hardware and battens, then rolling and encapsulating each scene.

Rolling the landscape drop for temporary storage until preservation. The Forum on Sept. 19, 2024. Photograph by Bernard Loyd.

For the first time, this process was documented by someone other than myself. Asia Taylor brought in her film crew in to document the project. Taylor previously produced and directed a short film that gives insight into the history of Forum Hall. CLICK HERE to watch her short film.

She is also one of the storytellers for Build Bronzeville. Build Bronzeville is comprised of five closely-linked initiatives that merge social, economic, civic, and creative approaches to achieve comprehensive community development. It is using the historic neighborhood’s unique assets to restore commercial activity and revitalize area through entrepreneurship, cuisine, exciting events, and beautification.  

Asia Taylor, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, and Brian Traynor examining a group of Black visitors to the Roman Forum. Sept. 19, 2024. Photograph by Bernard Loyd.
Moving the rolled street scene for encapsulation. Left to right: Erica Ruggiero, London Hainsworth, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, and Dorian Sylvain. Sept. 19, 2024. Photograph by Bernard Loyd.

Prior to Traynor’s departure, he passed along a gift from his mentor, Jim Maronek – scenic fitches once used by Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934) and a package labeled “Open at your own risk.”

Wendy Waazut-Barrett holding Thomas G. Moses’ scenic fitches – a gift from Jim Maronek.
Scenic fitches once used by Thomas G. Moses– a gift from Jim Maronek.
Dye and Paint sample books – a gift from Jim Maronek.

My research and career has circled around Jim Maronek for over three decades. It was his stewardship of many Thomas Moses artifacts made so much of my research possible.

Maronek who retrieved several of Moses’ artifacts when the family home in Oak Park sold – including an electric theatre model that is now part of the Sosman & Landis Collection at the Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas – Austin.

Theatre model (left) and scenic designs (right) in two trunks, once owned by Thomas G. Moses. Donated to the University of Texas – Austin, by Jim Maronek.
Label on the Thomas G. Moses trunk, now at the Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas – Austin.

I have visited the Oak Park home of Thomas and Ella Moses several times. I also make an annual trip to Graceland Cemetery where Sosman & Landis are buried. These moments really help energize my ongoing research.

Sosman & Landis gravestones in Graceland Cemetery, Chicago.

In 2023, Traynor and I stopped by Moses’ Oak Park home to meet to the new owners; they had contacted me when the property changed hands. I first visited the home on July 19, 2019, on a return trip from the East Coast. CLICK HERE for the post about that visit. The new owners are now collecting Moses’ work. Here are two of Moses’ paintings again hanging in the Oak Park Home

Painting by Thomas G. Moses, 1885, that has returned to his Oak Park home.
Painting by Thomas G. Moses, 1916, that has returned to his Oak Park home.

There were two other items on my agenda for the Chicago trip – visits to the Newberry Library and the Palette & Chisel Club. It was not until the fall of 2023 that I realized that both were located less than three blocks south of my hotel.  While walking to the Newberry to pick up my reader’s card, I passed by the Palette & Chisel Club building. Amazingly the gates were open! A new exhibit with works of was on display.

The Palette & Chisel Club, 1012 N. Dearborn Street, Chicago.

I have written quite a bit about the Palette & Chisel Club over the years. Founded in 1895, the Palette & Chisel Club was an association of artists and craftsmen for the purpose of work and study. The organization’s members were reported to be “all wage-workers, busy during the week with pencil, brush or chisel, doing work to please other people” (Inland Printer, 1896). But on Sunday mornings, they assembled for five hours to paint for themselves.

Many Sosman & Landis scenic artists belonged to the club, including Thomas G. Moses who joined in 1906. That year, Moses wrote, “I joined the Palette and Chisel Club at the Chicago Society of Artists.  I don’t know why, as I had so little time to give to pictures, but I live in hopes of doing something someday, that is what I have lived on for years, Hope, and how little we realize from our dreams of hope.  As the years roll by, I think one’s whole life is one continuous dream, unless we are wonderfully gifted, and fame drops on us while we sleep.” In 1906 the Palette and Chisel Club, the group consisted of sixty local painters, illustrators, and sculptors. On Jan. 6, 1906, the Chicago Tribune reported, the Palette & Chisel was “primarily a working club, being the oldest organization in the west” (p. 2).

The year before Moses joined the Palette & Chisel, the members purchased a summer retreat near fox lake. Initially, artists and their families camped in tents. In 1907, Moses wrote, “June 1st, I made my first trip to the Palette and Chisel Club camp at Fox Lake, Ill.  Helped to put up the tent.  A new experience for me, but I enjoyed it.  I slept well on a cot.  Made a few sketches.  A very interesting place.  I don’t like the cooking in the tent and there should be a floor in the tent.  I saw a great many improvements that could be made in the outfit and I started something very soon.”

The next year, Moses gifted a house to the group. In 1908 he wrote, “I bought the portable house that we built years ago and at that time we received $300.00 for it.  I finally got it for $50.00, some bargain.  It cost $25.00 to remove it and we will put it up at Fox Lake in the Spring.  It has been used in Forest Park all summer to show The Day in the Alps.”

In 1909, Moses painted a view of the new building. It was gifted to my by his great-grandson, Stu Nicholls, in 2017.

Painting by Thomas G. Moses of the summer retreat house, Fox Lake, 1909.

In 1906, the club maintained a permanent exhibition in the clubrooms on the seventh floor of the Athenæum building. The group moved to 1012 N. Dearborn Street in the 1921. In the 1920s Moses submitted several articles to the Palette & Chisel Club newsletter. His series “Stage Scenery” started in September 1927.

Article by Thomas G. Moses, entitled “Stage Scenery How it is Painted” – Palette & Chisel Newsletter.

After entering the building, I wandered about the main floor, recognizing artworks by several familiar names. 

Palette & Chisel Club Front room. Sept. 18, 2024.
The other front room at the Palette & Chisel Club. Sept. 18, 2024.

Then I followed the signs to the office in the basement. It was time to contact someone and share the information that I have gathered over the years.  The basement office had a lovely mural that documents the history of the Club.

Mural in basement office at the Palette & Chisel Club, c. 1930s-1940s.
Mural in basement office at the Palette & Chisel Club, c. 1930s-1940s.

By the end of the weekend, I met with the current president, Stuart Fullerton, and applied for membership. The Palette & Chisel Academy of Fine Arts is an amazing resource for both emerging and established artists. The membership benefits, even for those out-of-state like myself, are quite impressive. They are part of Open House Chicago on October 19, 2024 . If you are in the area, I strongly encourage you to stop by.

Upon my return to Minneapolis, I hit the ground running. Yesterday, I finished painting the scenery for my next Gilbert & Sullivan Very Light Opera Co. design – The McAdo (a Scottish Take on The Mikado). It opens on Nov. 1. 2024, and runs for four weekends. CLICK HERE to order tickets.

Here is a sneak peak of the scenery.

Painted detail from The McAdo, Gilbert and Sullivan Very Light Opera Co., Minneapolis, MN.

I am returning to work on my upcoming book series – Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre.

Have a great fall!

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: D. T. White and the Adelina Patti Theatre Act Drop

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

This is the final post about my trip to the Adelina Patti Theatre in Craig Y Nos, Wales, on August 7, 2024.

Act Drop detail at the Adelina Patti Theatre, Craig Y Nos Castle, Wales.

Scenic artist, Walter Hann, was the subject of my previous post, exploring the his creation of the stock scenery collection. The act drop for the theatre was painted by another London artist – Daniel T. White.

An illustration of Patti’s new act drop was published in Western Mail on August 13, 1891.

Screenshot

The article, entitled “Opening of the Patti Theatre at Craig-Y-Nos,” reported, “Upon entering the house the visitor is struck by the beauty of detail sown everywhere in this miniature opera house. Before him rises the act drop, which is an elegant picture, by White, of London, of the prima donna in the character of Semiramide driving a chariot and pair of horses…The act drop, which is an elegant picture, by White, of London, of the prima donna in the character of Semiramide driving a chariot and a pair of horses.”

Adelina Patti Theatre at Craig Y Nos Castle, Wales.

At the time I read the article, I had no idea that “White, of London” was actually Daniel Thomas White. My mind initially whirled, as I contemplated several nineteenth-century scenic artists named White. So, with only a common surname and a large city, there was very, very little information to start. Regardless, I knew that “Mr. White, of London” was no amateur artist, local hire, or talented youth at the beginning of his career.

For many nineteenth-century theaters, stock scenery collections and act drops were created by two different artists. Unlike standard stock scenes, the painting act drops (also referred to drop curtains or front drops in North America) required an extensive skill set, as well as familiarity with all subjects matter, including the painting of drapery, ornament, architecture, landscape, animals and figures.

On Dec. 18, 1894, in The Philadelphia Inquirer reported: “[The act drop] is the most expensive piece of furniture in any playhouse. Managers are most solicitous about the care of a handsome drop curtain than almost any other appointment in the theatres. They are usually painted by the artists of wide fame in the peculiar branch of art which they represent, whose charges for the work range from $1000 to $3000.”

A year later, The Magazine of Art published an article written by W. Telbin entitled, “Art in the Theatre: Act-Drops.” In 1895, he wrote, “…in the interval between acts a painted canvas, either representing drapery or other form of decoration, or a landscape (classical mostly), has been used. A commission to paint this canvas was always sought for by the scene-painter, for it was, and is, comparatively speaking, the only durable record of his work. Such a commission was considered a diploma of merit of the highest order, only falling into the hands of those of the ripest experience.”

My quest to track down “White, of London,” started with the opera. Semiramide is a two-act opera by Gioachino Rossini, based on the legendary figure Semiramis of Assyria who was heralded for her intellect, military leadership, and beauty.

Adelina Patti (left) and her likeness on the act drop.

I was surprised to find that Adelina Patti is frequently mentioned in various histories written about Semiramide. She performed the title role as part of the Cincinnati Opera Festival in 1882. This annual event not only featured world-class performers, but also featured well-known scenic artists from England, Europe, and the United States. On Jan. 16, 1882, the Chattanooga Daily Times provided a little context for the event, reporting, “The first Opera Festival realized the intentions of its founders, excelling as it did, in lyric, dramatic, and scenic splendor, any previous performance ever given in this country, if not in Europe; yet the second Festival will be more complete and attractive than any predecessor. The principal operas to be given are: “Fidelio,” Beethoven; “William Tell,” Rossini; “The Huguenots,” Meyerbeer; “Magic Flute,” Mozart. These splendid works of great composers will be presented with a magnificence and completeness heretofore unequaled. The scenery, costumes, and the stage properties of these great opera have been prepared in Italy, at a great expense, by Colonel Mapleson. The scenery, painted by Magnani, the greatest of living scenic artists, is elaborate and exceedingly beautiful.”  Other scenic artists associated with the Festival between 1881 and 1882 included Charles Fox, F. S. Humphreys, D. B. Hughes, John, Rettig, DeWitt C. Waugh, H. E. Burcky, and many others.

Col. Mapleson, named impresario for the Festival, was the key link between the Cincinnati Opera Festival and Adelina Patti. It was Mapleson who brought Patti overseas for her London debut in 1861, and Mapleson who brought her back to the United States for a, 1881. On Feb. 20, 1881, The Cincinnati Enquirer announced in “Opera Festival Notes” – “Adelina Patti will be the prima-donna at the Opera Festival next year” (p. 12). Interestingly, this was a week after the same newspaper announced, “Adelina Patti gets $3,000 for every performance she gives” (14 Feb 1881, p. 1). Patti consistently made American news throughout the early 1880s, even when performing in other countries. For many Americans, she was a household name.

It was Patti’s time spent in Cincinnati that made me contemplate if “White, of London” was actually the Cincinnati-based African-American scenic artist Solomon E. White (1841-1912). There were a few things that caused me to go down this particular rabbit hole. Solomon White had made a name for himself by the 1860s, working at the National Theatre, Robinson’s Opera House, Freeman’s Theatre, and Wood’s Theatre. He was a free African-American male who travelled all over the country to complete a variety of painting projects, including residential murals, oil paintings, and public artworks. Solomon White’s story is quite remarkable, but there is a period (c. 1885-1895) when he disappears from print – a time that coincides with the planning and construction of Patti’s Theatre. I had often considered that the omission of White’s name from North American newspapers at this time possibly indicated work abroad; a common occurrence for African-American theatre artists who sought friendlier receptions on foreign shores. This was also a period in American history accentuated by increased hostilities against Black communities. Amazingly, an artist named “Mr. S. E. White” was exhibiting in England at this time, including at the eleventh annual exhibition of the Sheffield Society of Artists in 1885 (Sheffield and Rotherham Independent 12 August 1885, p.3).

In the end, I traced the lives and careers of well over 100 other scenic artists with the same surname.  This meant looking at alternative spellings too, such as Whyte and Whaite. Many nineteenth-century scenic artists working in the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia are now in my database, including Septimus Whaite, Marmaduke “Duke” John Horton White, Eugene N. White, Frank H. White, H. O. White, J. B. White, James H. White, James V. White, John White, T. White, and Walter White, to name a few.

Just about the time I was ready to give up, I stumbled across the following article, published in The Era on October 25, 1868: “The Commencement of the season at the Haymarket Theatre is an event of some importance in the dramatic world, and on Monday night last a large audience assembled to welcome Miss Bateman on her return to the London stage. A fortnight since we recorded the principal features of the new decorations and embellishments which have been executed in such perfect taste under the immediate superintendence of Mr. John O’Connor, Mr. Buckstone’s principal scenic artist. The co-operation of Mr. W. Telbin, Mr. E. C. Barnes, and Mr. Daniel T. White has resulted in the most advantageously, and the Theatre now presents a remarkably chaste and elegant appearance. It will be remembered the above-named gentlemen are respectively answerable for the new act-drop (representing Tasso reciting a poem at Venice), the magnificent allegorical painting on the proscenium, and the four medallion portraits of Shakespeare, Ben Johnson, Garrick, and Sheridan. The two groups of Cupids (one in each spandrel) are also painted by the clever young artist Mr. D. T. White. As regards the act-drop, the name W. Telbin is a guarantee that he picturesque subject chosen would be treated in the highest style of art. The whole of this Venetian picture is suffused with the rich glow of sunset, and Mr. Telbin’s reputation as a colourist if fully sustained.”

This article places White within prestigious scenic art circle as an up-and-coming “clever young artist.” Here is his tale…

Daniel Thomas White was born on April 19, 1843. Baptized on July 7, 1843, at Saint Mary-St. Marylebone Road, St. Marylebone, London, he was the son of a chemist, Daniel White (1801-1886), and Caroline Docwra (1811-1893). In 1843, the White family resided at 19 Park Terrace.

He is another scenic artist that links the painting and chemistry trades, continuing a topic in my recent posts about Edmund Handby (Victoria Hall, Settle) and George Rivers Higgins (Georgian, Theatre, Richmond).

Daniel T. White Jr. was the second youngest son of several children born to the couple. His siblings included: Edmund White (b. 1831-1915), Jane Margaret White (1833-?), George Farr White (1836-1900), Frances “Fanny” Anne White (1838-), Elizabeth Caroline White (1840-1840), Louisa White (1841-1931), and William Edwin White (1844-1915). The 1851 Census listed Daniel T. White as one of several children living with their maternal aunt Jane M. Docwra (1890-1895), in Hatfield Mill (Mill Green) in Hertfordshire, England. Jane Docwra was Caroline White’s oldest sister; their parents were William Docwra (1784-1852) and Elizabeth Farr (1786-1812).

In 1851, Daniel’s Aunt Jane was clearly listed as the head housekeeper at Mills House. Her household included the following children: Caroline White (11 yrs., niece), Louisa White (9 yrs., niece), Daniel White (7 yrs., nephew) and William White (6 yrs., nephew). Although the entry of each child’s occupation is somewhat illegible, it looks like “paint pupils.” Docwra’s household also included lodger George Harrison, noted as the Millers foreman.

Meanwhile, Daniel’s parents and three older siblings (Edmund, Jane and George) were living at 19 Park Terrace, Christchurch Parish, Middlesex County. For geographical context, this is approximately 42 miles south of Hatfield, near London. Both Edmund White and Jane White were part of the family business, listed as assistant chemists.

Now, I was extremely curious about this whole living situation, so I started looking at previous census reports. It seems that when the White children were quite small, they lived with their Aunt Jane,. Once they were old enough to support help their father as assistant chemists, they returned home. In 1841, Jane White (7 yrs.), George White (5 yrs.), Fanny White (3 yrs.), Charles White (3 yrs.) and Caroline White (1 yr.) all lived with Aunt Jane in Hatfield. However, at that time Jane Docwra’s occupation was listed as “Ink.”

There is a big problem census reports and young children, as that a lot can happen over the course of ten years. Unless they make news (death, marriage, or a legal matter), it is difficult to follow their lives.

By 1861, Daniel White Jr. and his sister Frances were the only children living with their parents at Christchurch Parish, St. Marylebone, Middlesex. That year, the White household included: Daniel White Sr. (60 yrs.), Caroline White (50 yrs.), Frances White (23 yrs.), Daniel White Jr. (17 yrs.) and their servant Mary Cooper.  This was about the same time that Daniel should have entered the scenic art profession, as an apprentice or assistant. Unfortunately, no occupation was listed for him in the 1861 census, not even as his father’s assistant.

It was during the 1860s, however, that Daniel T. White showed promise as an artist and began exhibiting his paintings. On April 7, 1867, The Era described a painting by D. T. White in an article entitled, “French and Flemish Gallery of Paintings for 1867.” The article reported, “Among the social and familiar every-day incidents of life, which the French artist catches up with such gusto and avidity, and out of which he always contrives to work a good picture, we wish to draw attention to No. 208, In the Bois de Boulogne, by D. T. White. The subject is the early advances of a French soldier on the affections of a middle-aged nursemaid, or bonne, who while listening to the gallant wooer, allows her charges to take care of themselves. This picture, as an illustration of character, is a study.

I want to pause here to also note that were other individuals named Daniel White at this time, men who also went by D. T. White.

The scenic artist who painted Adelina Patti’s act-drop is Daniel Thomas White (1843-1908), the son of chemist Daniel White (1801-1886). However, throughout my research, I noticed that a lot of art historians confuse the dates and activities of four different men – each named Daniel White. In addition to Daniel Thomas White and his father, there was an art dealer and another artist named Daniel White.

For example, on March 10, 1868, The Daily Telegraph noted the passing of Daniel White on Feb. 5, listing him as a “Dealer in works of art, No. 45 Maddox-street, Bond-street, Oxford-street in county of Middlesex”(March 10, 1868, p. 1). This is neither the father nor the son in my story. Daniel Thomas White’s father (Daniel White Sr.) passed away on Sept. 7, 1886. Unfortunately, the art dealer also appears in numerous historic records as D. T. White – hence, the confusion. The Royal Academy listing for D. T. White notes “(fl. 1850-fl 1864) Art dealer based in Maddox Street, London.”

AND… there is a second family of London artists with the patriarch named Daniel White. I want to make sure that people don’t confuse this individual with the scenic artist who painted the Patti act drop. The 1911 census lists 71-yrs. old-widower and artist, Daniel White, living with his three sons in St. Marylebone. His sons were Arthur Charles White (son, 37 yrs., artist), Percy Alfred White (son, 34 yrs., artist), and Charles Daniel White (son, 29, insurance clerk). This Daniel White (son of Thomas and Harriet White) worked at various 19th-century trades, including tin plate work. He died in 1921 and is buried in the same plot with his eldest son, Arthur Charles White (1876-1943). Again, this is a completely separate family.

There is even a stage character named Daniel White from a comic drama written by  H. T. Craven; a production titled MILKY WHITE.

Unreal.

Advertisements that appear from the 1860s onward really threw a screw in the works. For example, here is a Want Ad in The Era, published on March 21, 1885 (p. 20).

I am certain that Daniel Thomas White (1843-1908), son of Daniel White (1801-1886), is the “White, of London” who painted the act drop for Adelina Patti’s Theatre. He assisted scenic artist, John O’Connor, throughout the 1860s.

On Oct. 18, 1869, The Times advertised: “TREASURE TROVE, Operetta, at 7. The music by Offenbach. The scene by Mr. F. Lloyds. Characters by Miss Susan Pyne, Miss Henrietta Everard, Miss Bessie Loviel, Mr. Frank Crellin, and Mr. Henry Broughton. At the conclusion of the Operetta, a New Act Drop, “King Charles Leaving St. James’s Palace for the Play,” painted by O’Connor (the figures by Mr. D. T. White) will be exhibited. – ST. JAMES THEATRE TO-NIGHT (Monday)” (p. 6).

John O’Connor (1830-1889) was extremely popular as both a scenic artist and easel artist, well-known for his landscapes and architectural paintings (cathedrals, churches, old buildings and street scenes). His artworks were exhibited across the country, and he was associated with the Society of British Artists, the Royal Academy, Royal Watercolour Society, the Royal Hibernian Society, and many other organizations. Much has been written about his theatrical contributions. However, for the purpose of this story – O’Connor was principal scenic artist at Theatre Royal, Haymarket, from 1863-1878, having succeeded William Callcott. Upon his passing, The Era reported, “We think we are correct in stating that the drop-curtain still used here [Haymarket Theatre] was the work of O’Connor and a pupil of his, Mr. Daniel White, who painted the four figures dancing a minuet” (p. 9). O’Connor’s obituary also remembered his “correctness of drawing, manipulative skill, and keen sense of the picturesque in the strongest light.”

It was O’Connor who even submitted a sketch of the Haymarket paint room that was published in The Graphic on Dec. 27, 1873.

Illustration by John O’Connor published in The Graphic, 27 Dec. 1873.

In 1871, Daniel T. White was listed in the Census as an artist, living with his older brother in Kingston, Surrey. The White household included George F. White (35 yrs., surgeon), Caroline (30 yrs.), Daniel T. White (28 yrs., artist), Mary Ann Steven (28 yrs., servant) and James Peters (17 yrs., groom).

1871 was the same year that D. T. White, E. F. Clarke, and W. J. Hennessy were credited with illustrations for a publication entitled, “The Dark Blue.”

D. T. White listed as an illustrator. The Cambridge Chronicle and University Journal  5 Aug 1871.
An illustration by D. T. White, engraved by C. M. Jenkin, for The Dark Blue.

I was also astounded to learn that in 1877 Daniel Thomas White was hired by Henry Labouchère to provide artwork for the new publication “Truth.”  The was remembered in an article entitled 50 Years of “Truth” that was published in The Evening Dispatch on January 5, 1927 (page 3). The article reported, “The jubilee number of “Truth,” which first saw the light on 4 January, 1877, appears to-day. It was founded by Henry Labouchere when he was 45 years of age, and its number bore on the front page which it still bears. The artist, Daniel Thomas White, was an unknown man who drew the design “on spec,” and sent it to Labouchere who, it is believed, paid £10 for it…for the first few years Labouchere edited the paper, and turned out columns of paragraphs, lengthy articles of several pages on theatrical affairs and a “city” article of several pages…

Here is the link to the first volume, numbers 1-26, with D. T. White’s illustration: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951002799229p&seq=17

In 1880, D. T. White was also listed as one of several men associated with the Junior Arts Club. On May 12, 1880 The Express reported, “The Junior Arts Club is the title of a new club at Lancaster House, Savoy, W. C. It is intended to be entirely a social club to facilitate intercourse between members of the literary, dramatic, artistic, and musical profession. It is anticipated that the rooms will be ready for occupation by Ladyday, when an inaugural dinner will be held. The following gentlemen constitute the honorary committee: – Sir Julius Benedict, J. Billington, H. J. Byron, Dutton Cook, W. W. Fenn, Luke Fildes, A.R.A.; W. P. Frith, R.A.; E. W. Godwin, F.S.A.; Major A. Griffiths, John Hollingshead, Henry Irving, Blanchard Jerrold, J. E. Millais, R.A.; J. C. Parkinson, C. Santley, Clement Scott, Major Hawley Smart, E. Solomon, Ashby Sterry, Charles Warner, D. T. White, W. G. Wills, and Edmund Yates” (p. 3).

D. T. White listed as a member of the Junior Arts Club.

By 1881, Daniel was living with another White brother in Christchurch Parish, St. Marylebone. Edmund White was now running the family business. The census listed the White household as including Edmund White (Chemist), Jane White (wife), George P. White (6, son), Edward D. White (3, son), Marshall Langtry (asst. Chemist), Josephus Mundaye (Chemist), Daniel T. White (brother, artist), Cecilia Purday (cook), and Elizabeth Bradford (servant).

In 1885, he married Maria Ann Curling (b.1861) in St. Giles Parish, London. Tragically, his young wife died that same year, and he did not remarry until 1897.

On Dec. 24, 1887, The Era Published an article entitled “The Drama at the Art Institute and the British Artists” (p. 9). D. T. White was listed as one of the contributors to the winter exhibition of the Institute of Painters in Oil Colours in Piccadilly. Of White’s artwork, the article reported, “Mr. D. T. White, who shows us, 509, “Garrick Introducing the Actresses to Dr. Johnson at his Theatre.” The actresses might have been portraits of Kitty Olive and Mrs. Abington, but are not. The Garrick is represented by Mr. White as almost of as many inches as Johnson, a height which makes Foote’s well-known jest about marionettes being “not so large as life – but only a little bigger than Mr. Garrick,” quite meaningless. The result of this introduction we know from Boswell was many a pleasant visit behind the scenes of Old Drury – visits which the susceptible old man, abruptly brought to an end, as he told Garrick himself, because the voluptuous charms of his actresses disturbed his meditations. Happily for the peace of mind our modern men of letters, they are not allowed to profane the mysteries of the Green-room!

The 1891 Census listed Daniel as part of his mother’s household at No. 22 Orchard Road, Kingston, Surrey. Now a widower, Daniel listed his occupation as artist painter/sculptor. His older sister Caroline, now 51 yrs. old, was also living with their mother. This was just after he painted the act drop for Adelina Patti’s Theatre at Craig Y Nos Castle in Wales.

Amazingly, in 1895, White’s design for Patti’s Theatre act drop was pictured in The Magazine of Art!!!

Although it credits T. D. White, the article clearly lists D. T. White.

In an article entitled “Art in the Theatre: Act-Drops,” White’s work was featured alongside that of William Telbin, Henry Emden, John O’Connor, F.  Harker, and Hawes Craven. I had accidentally stumbled across this article while doing one last search for “D. T. White.” 

What is remarkable about the image in the article is that it shows the actual design – not the completed act drop. We are able to see how certain elements were altered during the actual painting, including the addition of soprano roles to the border (see image below).

Detail on act-drop border at the Adelina Patti Theatre.

Interestingly, White’s design was criticized by William Telbin, author of the article. He wrote: “I also think that too much action is to be avoided on an act-drop. In the illustration on page 339, “Semiramide Driving the Chariot,” – though I have only seen the sketch herewith reproduced. The drop hangs in Madame Patti’s private theatre at Craig-y-Nos. Galloping horses must, of course, represent violent action, therefor the choice of subject I think not wise; calm water, placid skies, and the graceful rhythmic movement of the minuet – rather than stormy seas, wild and driving clouds, or dizzy whirling waltz – and thus the movement and colour in the School for Scandal scene exactly right.

Detail on act-drop at the Adelina Patti Theatre.
Detail on act-drop at the Adelina Patti Theatre.

Wow….tell that to the dozens of theatre managers who selected Ben Hur’s Chariot Race as the subject for drop curtains…

Telbin’s article also included an image of the Haymarket Theatre Act drop, credited by D. T. White and John O’Connor.

Of this act drop Telbin wrote, “A decorative subject agreeable in coulour, graceful in design, will not offend in one case and may add tone in the other; I distinctly feel that representations of scenes from particular plays are inadvisable. In support of this opinion, two illustrations form subjects are given. The first is a reproduction of Mr. D. T. White’s and John O’Connor’s picture from the School for Scandal as represented by Mr. and Mrs. Bancroft at the Prince of Wale’s Theatre; and the other, Charles the First and Henrietta Maria in the grounds of Hampton Court Palace, by Mr. Hawes Craven, for the Lyceum. They are both charmingly painted, and most agreeable subjects, but are too distinctly individual to be quite appropriate in their agreeable public position.”

I have to wonder if Telbin was trying to pick a fight at this point. There is nothing like criticizing the work of your colleagues in a very public manner – and in an ART magazine.

A few years after Telbin’s article, Daniel White married again. At the age of 54 yrs. old, he wed 42-yrs.-old Kate Elizabeth Beyant Turner in Wandsworth, England. This was a second marriage for Kate too. Her first husband had been a banker, Charles Turner (1807-1891), 44 yrs. her senior. The childless couple lived in a house full of servants near the end, their marriage lasting from 1883 until Charles’ passing in 1891.

The 1901 Census listed Daniel and Kate White as living in Putney, London; White’s occupation as “artist oils/sculptor.” Daniel T. White passed away only seven years later, just shy of his 65th birthday, in 1908. He is buried at Putney Vale Cemetery, in Wandsworth. Kate White outlived her husband by many years, living until 1936. I have located precious little information about her life as a widow.

It was almost 90 years before Daniel T. White made the news again. One of his paintings was pictured in The Independent On April 29, 1990. Titled “Battledoor and Shuttlecock,” it was part of the exhibit London’s Pride: the History of the Capital’s Gardens’ at the Museum of London, that ran from May 1-August 12, 1990.

All that remains of White’s legacy is a handful of oil paintings, some newspaper articles, and the Adelina Patti Theatre act-drop. Despite severe deterioration, the act-drop is the only extant example of White’s scenic art. It celebrates his brilliance as a scene painter who studied with John O’Connor. This drop desperately needs to be stabilized to prevent irreparable damage. It is a national treasure, a culturally significant artifact in the history of world theatre that not only documents the scenic artistry of Daniel T. White, but also the theatrical vision of Adelina Patti.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall in Settle, England.

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Victoria Hall is listed as one of the first purpose-built music halls in the UK.  

Victoria Hall in Settle.
Victoria Hall, Settle.
Victoria Hall, Settle.

The music hall was built by Rev. James Robinson, a local philanthropist and secretary of the Settle Choral Society. From its inception, the hall was constructed for both public instruction and entertainment.

The formal opening and dedication of the building took place on Monday. Oct. 11, 1853. Celebratory events included a performance of Haydn’s Creation, featuring vocalists and instrumentalists from choral societies in Settle and Leeds.

Over the years, Victoria Hall hosted a variety of entertainments that included caricaturists, ventriloquists, magicians, and even P. T. Barnum side-show acts. Local groups also met in the building, including the Settle Mechanics’ Institute. Mechanics’ Institutes were educational organizations formed for the betterment of society through instructing individuals in various trades and subjects.

By the 1879, Settle’s Music Hall became home to the Settle Amateur Dramatic Society. It was this group that likely fueled the demand for the 1882 Act-drop curtain, currently on display. Painted by Society member, Edmund Handby (1850-1918), a local artist and performer. Dozens of newspaper accounts recount Handby’s skill as a painter, comedian, vocalist (tenor), and instrumentalist (coronet player).

It was the discovery of Handby’s Act-Drop, combined with the revelation of the painted proscenium arch, that helped guide the most recent building renovation. The Victoria Hall backdrop received a grade II listing and is believed  to be one of only five similar surviving in England.

Covered in a layer of dust, the act-drop had been stored for decades above the rafters. Storing scenery above the stage, above an auditorium, or in the distant recesses of a theatre is not uncommon.

1879 Scenery currently stored above the rafters at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. It is currently inaccessible, but safe for the time being.

When painted scenes became damaged, or were deemed unnecessary, there remained individuals who understood the cultural significance of each artifact. These people, whom I consider to be the first generation of stewards, helped preserve historic stage artifacts by storing them in hard-to-reach locations. If an artifact was difficult to access, it was less likely to be thrown out on a whim.

Painted detail of Comedy Mask on Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop at Victoria Hall, Settle.
Painted detail from central composition on the Act-Drop by Edmund Handby.
Painted detail from central composition on the Act-Drop by Edmund Handby.
Painted detail from central composition on the Act-Drop by Edmund Handby.

In addition to the discovery of the Act-Drop, Victoria Hall’s painted proscenium arch was also revealed in the 1990s when a chunk of plaster fell away during the redecoration.

The altered interior of Victoria Hall, concealing the painted proscenium arch.

The painted proscenium arch is quite stunning; a glimpse into an era when decorative ornament was not always dimensional.

Painted Proscenium Arch above the Edmund Handby Act-Drop.
Painted detail from Proscenium Arch at Victoria Hall, Settle.

Side note: Although no one is currently credited with proscenium arch painting (c. 1909), it is very possible that it is from Handby’s brush. I am not convinced that someone else would have been asked to paint the arch if Handby was still painting in Settle at the time. I also look at the fringe and tassels (despite their being recently restored), and see a similarity in style – but with the experience of time.

Painted detail on Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall, Settle.

The discovery of culturally significant artifacts can often generate community support.  In 1994, there was discussion about adequate community facilities for leisure and recreation in Settle. The choice was either to build an entirely new community center or “rehabilitate” Victoria Hall.

Settled Victoria Hall Ltd was established in 1999, and now holds a 99-year lease from Craven District Council. Despite the building’s derelict state at the time, funds were secured to renovate Victoria Hall. The restored venue reopened on March 3, 2001.

There are two lovely scrapbooks about the history of Victoria Hall; graciously shared by Finance & Marketing manager, Josie Guthrie.

It was Guthrie gave us full access to the hall on August 4. Mike Hume fully photographed the space, so more information will be published at Historic Theatre Photography. I will provide a link HERE when it is ready.

Mike Hume at work on August 4, 2024.

This post focuses on life and career of Edmund Handby, as well as his large-scale artwork for Settle’s Music Hall in 1882.

I will start with Handby’s act-drop. The subject is based on an 1822 artwork by George Nicholson. Here is the image included in the Victoria Hall scrapbook:

Original composition created by George Nicholson depicting Settle, 1822, In the Victoria Hall Scrapbook.

Here is a color lithograph available online at Rare Old Prints

A color lithograph of George Nicholson’s print available at Rare Old Prints.

The composition features the Settle market place in the 1820s. Elements identified in the painting are The Shambles (far left), the Old Tollhouse (pictured center and later demolished to make way for the town hall), and Castleberg Rock (although exaggerated, pictured in the distance).

Painted detail from Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall, Settle.
Act-Drop painted by Edmund Handby in 1882.

There is one other thing that caught my eye beyond the composition – the fabrc. It was constructed with standard drill cloth. I have only encountered this type of fabric in stage scenery once before – at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. The Standard Drill cloth was manufactured by Stark Mills, Manchester, New Hampshire, USA.

Detail of fabric used in the Victoria Hall Act-Drop.
Detail of drilling cloth used for scenery at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, c. 1879
Detail of drilling cloth used for scenery at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, c. 1879

Standard Drilling cloth, manufactured at cotton mills, was popular for lining used in skirts, pants, and jackets. In rural communities, it was readily accessible to use for theatrical scenery. For more information about this type of fabric, here is my post about Stark Mills standard drilling cloth.

The Victoria Hall scrapbooks have a section devoted to Edmund Handby, identifying him as an “Operatic Stalwart.” Dressed up as Stephen in Iolanthe, he certainly looks the part!

Page in Victoria Hall scrapbook about Edmund Handby.

Here is a better photograph of his image in the scrapbook:

Edmund Handby as Stephen in Iolanthe, 1895.

Before I get into the details of Handby’s life and career, I want to place his life within the context of a much bigger picture – that of rural scenic artists in both the United Kingdom and United States.

Handby represents the majority of scenic artists working from the early-to late-19th-century. These small-town scenic artists poured both their time and talent into so many local and regional endeavors. They were essential members of the community, who, in most cases, were extremely active citizens. The participated in the majority of public events and entertainments. These scenic artists were integral to rural communities with entertainment halls. Local heroes one could say. Although most never received any national recognition (as they were not associated with major metropolitan venues), their contribution certainly deserves mention in history books.

Small stages across the country offered many aspiring artists an opportunity to showcase skill. Scene painting projects provided an opportunity to be heralded and respected by their community, and in some cases region.  Artists such as Handby took on a variety of projects, working as decorative artists, sign writers, carriage painters, glaziers, chemist, and plumbers. Their contributions were very, very visible to the general public. Many local artists also taught painting classes and sold their small-scale artworks at local stores and events.

Rural scenic artists often fully embraced every aspect of the production too – music, performance, and management. They contributed in so many different ways to numerous amateur groups, including dramatic societies, operatic societies, orchestras, bands, fraternities and other social organizations.

Here is Handby’s tale…

Edmund Handby was born in Bentham, Yorkshire, England, in January 1850. Some of his descendants indicate that he was nicknamed “Ted” by family and friends. Handby was the youngest of three sons, born to James Handby (1816-1874) and Ann Tomlinson (1809-1871). His older brothers were John Handby (1841-1918) and James Tomlinson Handby (1846-1897).

Their father tried his hand at a variety occupations over the years, working as a constable, quarryman, and gardener. Gardener seems to have been the one that eventually stuck. A few interactions and court cases published in local newspapers suggest that James Handby Sr. was quick to temper and little foul-mouthed. That being said, it is it hard to judge a person, or the dynamics in a small town, when so much time has passed. However, when you look at the whole of a family, you can see that something was at play. It may not have been the easiest upbringing for the Handby children. I am only going to mention his two brothers at this time.

Edmund’s oldest brother (John Handby) was apprenticed as a Plumber and Glazier by 1861, although he was still living at home with Edmund and his parents. By the way, this is the same trade listed by George Rivers Higgins in a past post (scenic artist of the woodland scene, Georgian Theatre, Richmond).

Edmund’s brother James Tomlinson Handby was out of the family home by 1861, despite his young age. He was likely placed as an apprentice at little father away. James Handby Jr. became a tailor by trade, but died relatively young. He passed away at the age of 52 yrs. in 1897. The cause of death was listed as “suicide during temporary insanity.” James Jr. shot himself.

Little is known of Edmund Handby’s formative years in Settle. The Handby family were still living in Settle. On Oct. 8,  1863, The Bradford Observer listed his father “James Handby, gardener, Settle” as contributor for a gift to the Rev. M. Wood, Second Master of Giggleswick School. The gift was a Tea and Coffee Service, Salver and Purse containing 200 guineas.

Three years later, his son made the news.The first mention of Edmund Handby has to do with a tragic railroad incident.

Railway stop at Settle.

On August 18, 1866, The Lancaster Gazette reported, “The Windermere Excursion Train Accident – Our usually quiet little town was thrown int a state of great excitement on Wednesday when the news came that an accident had happened to the excursion train which had that morning taken a great many passengers from Settle and Windermere. Those who had friends or relatives amongst the passengers were concerned to know whether that had escaped injury, and several persons met the train at the station on its return to learn the truth. Then, and not till then, it was ascertained with certainty that no Settle persons had been seriously injured, except a young man of the name Edmund Handby who got badly hurt about the head, and was brought home by an earlier train and placed under medical care. Very many were more of less bruised, and among them were the following, who were more seriously injured than the rest, viz.: Mr. Michael Wilson, the young man Handby, a son of Mr. Greenwood, grocer, Mrs. Perfect, Miss Clayton, and Mrs. J. Brennand. All, we are glad to hear, are going on favorably.” This places the Edmund Handby and his family in Settle, between 1863 and 1866 when Edmund entered the painting trade as an apprentice.

Railway lines in Settle.
Painted detail on Act-Drop curtain by Edmund Handby, 1882.
Bench at the train station in Settle.

Here are two articles that mention Handby’s social activities before he settled down in 1872. On Feb 27, 1869, The Lancaster Gazette  announced that in Settle, the Band of Hope had sponsored a Music Hall entertainment. Readings, recitations, speeches and songs were presented by various local citizens, including Handby who sang (with chorus) Eulalie.

On Dec. 10, 1870, The Lancaster Gazette listed Handby as performing a coronet Solo -Air with variations – for another Band of Hope entertainment at the Music Hall.

That is pretty much the extent of Handby’s activities published in local news prior to his marriage. When he did wed a few years later, the trade of painter was listed on his marriage certificate. In 1872, Handby also listed his residence as Huddersfield in 1872, whereas his wife was living in Settle. Huddersfield was southeast of Leeds, a significant distance from Settle, but a much larger town.

Edmund married Jane Holmes on April 23, 1872, at Ascension Church in Settle. The two remained in town where Handby continued to work as a painter and decorator.

Holy Ascension Church and cemetery in Settle. 3 August 2024.

Edmund and Jane celebrated the birth of six children: John (b. 1875), Bertram (b. 1881), Bessie (b. 1883), Edmund (b. 1887), Annie (b. 1888) and Madeline Ellen (nd).

For larger painting projects throughout the area, Handby advertised for assistants. On May 5, 1875, Handby placed a want ad in The Bradford Observer: “TO PAINTERS. – Wanted, Two or Three good HANDS. Apply to E. Handby, Settle.

He also continued to perform, joining a variety entertainments. For example, Handby performed the song “Nina” for the Settle Cricket Club entertainment at the Music Hall in 1876 (1 Jan. The Lancaster Gazette p. 3). Overall, the majority of Handby’s social activities were included in newspapers throughout the 1880s. One in particular made me chuckle; Hanbdy performed in the William Tell burlesque. The burlesque was part of the Church Institute’s annual tea party (17 Jan 1880 The Lancaster Gazette).

The year before Handby painted Victoria’s Hall act-drop, the 1881 Census listed his household as including: Edmund (31 yrs., head), Jane (35 yrs., wife), John (5 yrs, son), Edmund (2 yrs., son) and Margaret Holmes (18 yrs., niece). Margaret would never leave the Handby home, eventually becoming their maid.

In the 1881 census, Handby was listed as a decorator and photographer. As many scenic artists at the time, photography was a natural addition to the painting trade. By now, his sons  John and Edmund were 15yrs, and 12 yrs. old, respectively.

In 1881 Handby also placed an advertisement in The Daily Telegraph, inquiring: DRAPERY. – WANTED, smart YOUNG MAN, with almost three years good experience, for drapery counter, and to assist in dressing window.- Apply after six p.m. to Edmund Handby, 6, Willow-place, near Stoke Newington Station.

It does not appear that Hanby remained in the photography profession for long, soon returning to the decorative arts and performance.

Handby performed the role of “Toby Perch” in Morton’s Old Honesty. On Feb. 18, 1882 The Lancaster Gazette reported, “Mr. Handby’s comicalities both of look and gesture completely captivated his auditory, whose applause at times was nigh deafening.”

It was about this time that Handby also became quite active in the newly-formed Amateur Dramatic Society. He was credited as not only a performer, but also the group’s scenic artist (4 Dec 1880 The Lancaster Gazette p. 3).

Stencil-work on Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall, Settle, 1882.
Painted detail on Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall, Settle.
Painted detail on Edmund Handby’s Act-Drop for Victoria Hall, Settle.

1882 productions, with scenery painted by Handby, included Amateur Dramatic Society’s The Post Boy and My Turn Next. On Dec. 18, 1882, The Lancaster Gazette reported, “As on former occasions, the scene painting was done by Mr. E. Handby, and the stage effects by Mr. R. Grime. On this occasion their united labours had produced the most elaborate scenery which was universally admired.” Handby continued to perform with the group, and was in the production of All That Gliters is Not Gold in 1884. (19 Apr 1884 The Lancaster Gazette p. 6)

At the same time, Handby was also singing with Settle’s Choral Society. He sang as a tenor solist in Hadyn’s Creation (23 Apr 1881 The Lancaster Gazette p. 5) and in W. H Birch’s Robin Hood (6 May 1882 The Lancaster Gazette p. 8). On Dec. 23, the Weekly Examiner listed Handby singing at the first concert of the newly formed Holmfirth District Choral Society. The article reported, “Mr. Handby (of Settle), who is on a visit to this district, sang two recitatives and two airs with an excellent tenor voice.”

On March 3, 1883, The Lancaster Gazette reported that donations to the Royal Albert Asylum for Idiots and Imbecils of the Northern Counties, Lancaster, received “Settle – E. Handby, two framed pictures, per Cbr. Brown, hon. Local Secretary.” Side note: Keep this type of event in mind when you read my future blog about Normansfield Entertainment Hall. Handby continued to perform with choral groups throughout the 1880s. Here is one more example. On July 9, 1887, The Leeds Mercury reported that “Mr. Handby, of Settle” sand a solo at the annual North Craven Choir Union Festival at Gargrave.

Handby continued to work as a scenic and decorative artist, hiring help as needed for larger projects. On April 25, 1883, Handby placed an advertisement in The Leeds Mercury, looking for a “PAINTER and PAPER HANGER; steady man. Apply Edmund Handby, Duke-street, Settle.” By now, Handby was 33 yrs. old and doing quite well. His projects included room decor for many different social events that were planned throughout the season.

On Jan. 5, 1884, The Lancaster Gazette reported, “LIBERAL CLUB BALL – The annual ball in connection with the Settle Liberal Club was held at Drill Hall on Friday evening, 28th ult. There was a large and representative assembly, by whom dancing was kept up with vigour and evident appreciation into the small hours of the following morning. The Settle quadrille band supplied the musical requirement, whilst Mr. Overing provided the refreshments, which gave great satisfaction. The room had been artistically decorated by Mr. Edmund Handby.”

Here is another example…On Jan. 3, 1885, The Lancaster Gazette described CHRISTMASTIDE’s Volunteer Ball at Drill Hall, noting, “The room had been most tastefully decorated for the occasion by Mr. Edmund Handby.”

Although it is easy to think of Handby as an amateur artist and performer, his career mirrored that of many well-known English and American scenic artists, as he also exhibited his fine art works.

On Dec. 13, 1884, The Lancaster Gazette announced:

FINE ART EXHIBITION. – Mr. Edmund Handby’s exhibition of oil-paintings, water-colour drawings, hand painted mirrors, and screens and other works of art, which was opened in the Assembly Room at the Ashfield Hotel on Tuesday the 2nd instant and continued until Wednesday last has afforded genuine pleasure to the many visitors who have inspected the collection. The display of valuable oil-paintings and water-colour drawings comprise several; meritorious works which did infinite credit to the respective artists. The mirrors and screens exhibited deserve more that a passing notice, not only on account of their artistic merit but as being work of a native of Settle. It is to Mrs. McClelland that we owe the revival of this art, which was formerly practiced by the early Italian masters and used simply as a wall decoration. Now, however, Mrs. McClelland has applied it to a variety of objects which have taken prominent places in artistic English homes.

I would really love to see one of his paintings! Just to see how it compares with his large-scale scenic art.

There was also another aspect of Handby’s life that I stumbled across while doing research – he became a Freemason in 1885, joining Castleberg Lodge No. 2091, Settle. Handy was initiated on 25 June 1885, becoming a Master Mason when he was raised on Dec. 2, 1887. Grand Lodge records list Handby’s profession as a decorative artist. This could have cemented many future projects in the area.

By the 1890s, Handby began to look explore another aspect of the theatrical trade – theatre management. He applied for a theatrical license. The name of Settle’s Music-hall had become known as Settle’s Public Hall. It was mentioned in a local newspaper announcement in the fall of 1892. On Sept. 24, 1892, The Leeds Mercury announced: “The Public Hall at Settle. Mr. E. Handby has made an application for a license for the Public Hall (late Music-hall), Settle, but he did not appear in support of his application.” Later than month, on September 29, 1892, Handby was granted a theatrical license from the General Purposes Committee of the West Riding County Council for Victoria Hall at Settle. Notice the name change to Victoria Hall. The committee meeting was held at the Clerk of the Peace Offices, Wakefield, and published in The Leeds Mercury on Sept. 30, 1892. In the announcement, “Mr. E. Handley [sic. Handby]” was listed as the manager of the Victoria Hall, Settle (p. 3). Handby was still working as the hall’s manager, and functioning as its main contact, two years later. On March 30, 1894, The Leeds Mercury announced the renewal of Victoria Hall’s theatrical license, again E. Handby was listed as the manager.

Despite his work as a manger and performer, Handby’s primary income stemmed from the decorative arts. He continued to be listed as a painter and decorator until the 1911. The census that year listed Handby as a 61-yrs. old house painter. He was now a widower, living with his 23-yrs. old daughter Annie, and 48 yrs. old niece Margaret Holmes; Margaret was listed as his housekeeper.

Both Edmund and his brother John passed away in 1918. This was the same year that the world was plagued with a pandemic. Edmond died on Feb. 24, 1918.

It was the year after his passing that Victoria Hall became a cinema.

To be continued…

Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. 1883-1884

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Thomas G. Moses left Sosman & Landis in late-May 1882. He had been with the firm for a little more than two years. During this short period of time, Sosman & Landis had greatly increased their staff and productivity. Their primary work included stock scenery collections and drop curtains. Many of the drop curtains included local business cards surrounding a central landscape. In other words, they were painting advertising curtains.

Pencil sketch of an ad drop design. Twin City Scenic Co. collection. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives.

In 1880 Moses wrote, “My first work was to go to Kenosha, Wisconsin and start the first job of scenery that Sosman and Landis ever did. Up to this job they had been doing nothing by advertising drop curtains.”

By 1883, the firm was reliant upon delivering multiples. For example, a number of their drop curtains depicted the same, or very similar design. Popular subjects at this time were Roman chariot races, Venetian seascapes, and Alpine landscapes.

Moses soon became tired with the repetitive nature of the projects. That year wrote “1882 found me just as restless to do something big, and I drifted along with the regular work, until about May, when Graham’s Theatre season closed. We got together and I quit the firm after refusing a big salary – that is, for me.”  At the time, Moses was making $26 a week, but had been picking up extra work with Lemuel L. Graham (1845-1914) at the Academy of Music and Standard Theatre in Chicago. Graham also worked for Sosman & Landis, but always maintained a theatre affiliation.

At the end of May 1882 Moses partnered with Graham, establishing Moses & Graham, scenic artists. This may have been in the works for a while as when the two painted scenery for Sosman & Landis at the Minneapolis Academy of Music in 1881, they also went by title Moses & Graham. Graham had at least eleven years more experience than Moses, having painted all across the country. In fact, Graham had trained with some of the best artists in San Francisco, Cleveland, Memphis, and New Orleans before settling in Chicago.

Moses & Graham quickly landed a series of projects, becoming immediate competition with Sosman & Landis. From May 1882 until March 1883, their projects included: the Academy of Music in Kalamazoo, Michigan; Redmond’s Opera House in Grand Rapids, Michigan; Blake Opera House and Belle City Opera House in Racine, Wisconsin; the Opera House in Marengo, Illinois; the Grand Opera House in Eau Claire, Wisconsin; and the Opera House in Burlington, Wisconsin.

Scenery installations completed by Moses & Graham between May 1882 and May 1883.

Moses & Graham added scenic artist, John H. Young to their team, when they were in Grand Rapids. Moses had previously worked with Young early on in his career and the two were close friends. Young remained with team, assisting in Racine, Marengo, Eau Claire and Burlington. Three skilled scenic artists meant that Moses & Graham were able to work on multiple projects, hiring local assistants when needed. They quickly became direct competitors with Sosman & Landis.

It was only a matter of time before Moses & Graham went after the same project at Sosman & Landis. It is important to remember that after two years, Moses intimately understood his former employer’s designs, bidding process, and profit margin; this put him at quite an advantage when the two bid on the same job in Wisconsin.  Both arrived in town in late March 1883. On March 23, The Osh Kosh Northwestern announced Perry Landis’ arrival in Osh Kosh at the Revere and Oak Bros.” (p. 1).  Thomas G. Moses wrote, “I went to Oshkosh, Wisconsin, after a contract.  I met Mr. Landis there.  I got the contract.  We rode to Chicago together and met Mr. Sosman on our arrival.  We were offered $45.00 a week.  I wired Graham at Burlington.  He answered $50.00 and extras.  We closed for that.” $50 in 1883 is the equivalent of almost $1700 today. Moses’ salary at Sosman & Landis almost doubled between September 1881 and March 1883.

This amount needs to be put in context, as it signals a new level of appreciation by Sosman & Landis. When Sosman first hired Moses in 1880, it was for $18 a week. This salary was increased to $20 a week during the spring of 1881. By the fall of 1881, Moses’ salary was again increased to $26/week. However, this was still far below the average scenic art rate of $35-$45 a week.

Moses and Graham’s return to Sosman & Landis caused a bit of a stir with the Osh Kosh Opera House Committee. On April 4, 1883, the Oshkosh Northwestern reported, “Graham & Moses, who were awarded the contract for furnishing curtains, scenery and stage settings for the Opera House have notified that they withdrew their bid and decline the contract. On receipt of this also comes a notification from Sosman & Landis, who also bid on the job to the effect that they have employed Graham & Moses in their establishment and are asking that the contract be awarded them in accordance with their bid. It appears that there were only two bids in for the work, that of Graham & Moses and one from Sosman & Lands. The latter’s bid was about $700 larger than that of Graham & Moses, and, now it would seem the two firms have fixed it up, so as to try and have the contract awarded at a greater amount. The directors are now talking of giving the contract to other parties entirely and not letting either of those firms get a finger in it” (page 4).

After completing Osh Kosh scenery project in April, Moses wrote, “May 1st found Graham, Young, and Myself back on Clark Street at the Sosman & Landis Studio. I averaged $70.00 per week, as we had a lot of night work, mostly piece work. We had to do all the road work which I didn’t like. Ed Loitz joined the force this year.” This was a far cry from the $18/week that Sosman offered Moses in 1880.  

For context: $70/week in 1883 is approximately $2250/week today. This means that Moses’ monthly earning of $280/month is the equivalent of $10,000/month today.  

Sosman & Landis were enjoying an extremely high profit margin.  Throughout the 1880s, the firm maintained a 45% profit margin, or more. To look at their work in a larger picture, I am going to examine the price of a drop curtain at this time. In 1884, Sosman & Landis placed a bid on a drop curtain for the Masonic Temple in Fort Wayne, Indiana. They were one of five scenic studios bidding on the project. The other four were Noxon, Halley & Toomey, Moses & Co, E. B. Fickes, and Kover & Son.

Their bids were published in The Fort Wayne Sentinel on May 21, 1884:

Noxon, Halley & Toomey, St. Louis, $1,800; Sosman & Landis, Chicago, $1,800; Moses & Co., Kalamazoo, $1,550; E. B. Fickes, $1537; Kover & Son, Cincinnati, $1,500.

The project went to the lowest bidder, Kover, who was former Fort Wayne resident.

Thomas C. Noxon also commented on the average price of drop curtains that year. On January 21, 1884, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch published an article entitled, “Curtain and Scene Painting. The Leading Artists of the Country and the Prices Paid for Their Work” (page 8).  Noxon, Albert & Toomey had just delivered a new drop curtain to the Grand Opera House in St. Louis. The reporter queried, “What does a new drop curtain cost?”  Noxon replied, “About $500 or $600.”

When asked about how long a drop curtain too to paint, Noxon responded, “All the way from two or three days to five or six weeks. I painted a drop for Tootle’s Opera House, Sedalia. Some years ago, in two and one-half days and got $500 for it, but an artist now seldom turns out a piece of work of this kind in less than three weeks. He can put in much time on it with a great deal of profit.”

Even if one used a timeframe of three weeks, with Moses’ salary of $50/week, that means that the labor for the drop curtain was $150, plus materials. If you factor in materials, shipping, and installation at another $100, that is still less than half for a $500 curtain. So is we look at the 1884 bids for $1500 and $1600, you can see how there could be a significant profit margin for this work.

When asked about the price of stocking a theatre with new scenery, Noxon responded, “From $2,000 to $3,500” for approximately thirty-five sets, “enough for putting on any legitimate piece.”  This price did not include a new drop curtain, a piece that was almost as expensive as all of the other scenery combined.

Between 1883 and 1884, Sosman & Landis was becoming a well-oiled machine with standard operating procedures. Salesman travelled the region and landed contracts. Scenic artists and stage carpenters were sent on site to complete many stock scenery collections. Distance, venue, existing scenery, and timeline were all taken into consideration when factoring the various options of location and manufacture.  The final decision was based timeline, workload, and available space, in the main studio on Clark Street in Chicago.

Regardless of whether the work was completed in the studio or on site, it often took place place over the span of a few weeks. Some of the more complicated scenes, such as drop curtains, were frequently painted in the studio, shipped to the locations where the accompanying stock scenery was being painted on site.

Once a stock scenery collection was completed, Sosman & Landis made a point of displaying their work under stage lights to a small group of local individuals; a group that almost always included a local reporter. This “sneak peak” of the scenery received a big write up in local newspapers with scenery described in detail.  These articles provide great insight into what the firm was delivering to stages across the country.

I located a wonderful article describing scenery painted by Sosman & Landis employee, H. J. Buhler, for Myer’s Opera House in Janesville, Wisconsin. On Oct. 23, 1883, the Janesville Daily Gazette announced Buhler’s arrival: “Mr. H. J. Buhler, of Sosman & Landis studio, Chicago, arrived in the city yesterday afternoon to begin the work of painting new scenery for Myers opera house” (page 4). The article continued, “There has been a great improvement made of late in stage decorations, and standing at the front of artists in this line are Sosman & Landis. They have within the past year or so painted scenery for many of the largest theaters in the west…Mr. Buhler, who has been commissioned to do the work, is an artist of rare skill in that line. The decorations in many of the principal opera houses in the west are by his brush. He thoroughly understands the tendency of modern art as applied to the scenic department, and will do some excellent work. It will take him about two weeks to complete the work and will be engaged both day and night.”

On Nov. 12, 1883, The Janesville Daily Gazette described Buhler’s progress and the scenery (page 3).  The article reported:

“Mr. H. J. Buhler from the scenic studio of Sosman & Landis, Chicago, show has been engaged in painting new scenery for Myers Opera House more than two weeks past, will finish the work on Wednesday of this week. To-morrow evening, Mr. Buhler will arrange different stage settings which will show the general character of the work done by him. This will be done for the accommodation of the press of the city. Among the pieces executed by Mr. Buhler are two tormentors and two tormentor wings, and a grand drapery border 12 feet wide by 25 feet long. The scene includes a kitchen set, a plain chamber set, a prison set, a handsome box parlor set of Modern Eastlake ebony comprising two pairs of flats and four wings and borders to match. It is one of the finest box parlor sets to be found in any theater or opera house in this state, and is beautifully decorated with bric-a-brac, armor, plaques, and so on. There is also a Louis 14th gothic set which is also very beautiful. The landscape paintings embrace a country landscape; a dark wood scene; a rocky pass taken from Yellowstone park; a set house, vases, and balustrade. There is also an ancient street scene taken from Strasburg, and is, in all respects, a very effective scene. One of the finest scenes among the large collection which ornaments the stage of the opera house, is an ocean set, which is a splendid piece of marine painting. Very many of these sets and scenes will be used for the first time on Thursday night when Miss Anna Dickinson will produce Anne Boleyn. Mr. Buhler has kindly consented to remain here that night an arrange the scenery for the play. A new drop curtain, a very elegant one, costing not less than $200, has been ordered by Mr. Meyers, and will be painted in Chicago. There is now four times more scenery in Myer’s opera house than ever before, and aside from the quantity, ion artistic merit it is not excelled by that of any other opera house in Wisconsin. Messrs. Sosman & Landis have a wide reputation as scenic painters and have decorated many of the leading theaters and opera houses in the west, and they have served Mr. Myers well and have done a good public service, by sending Mr. Buhler here to furnish the opera house with new scenery. He is a thorough artist, and having made scenery a specialty for years, he was, in every particular, fully competent for the task. He is a rapid workman and a genius in his line. The public will be surprised on Thursday evening to learn the great quantity of fine scenery he has turned out in so short a time. Every single piece is a credit to the artist, and a great advantage to the opera house.”

If Buhler were paid the same amount as Moses and Graham in 1883, he earned less than $300 for the project. By 1882, the studio employed a staff of five scenic artists.

By the summer of 1883, Sosman & Landis’ staff included: Thomas G. Moses, Lemuel L. Graham, John H. Young, Edward Loitz, William P. Davis, Henry C. Barrow, Harry J. Buhler, Edward Morange, Hardesty Maratta, Charles S. King, Cyrus M. Crouse, C. W. Corey and August Kreis. The staff continued to increase over the next year, as the studio’s workload continued to increase. David A. Strong, Henry C. Tryon, Charles E. Boyer, Claude Hagen, and C. D. Baker were associated with the firm by 1884.

I have identified six ways that Sosman & Landis secured scenic and stage work at this time. I will explain each way.

1. The first way was local advertisements, placed in newspapers across the country. They received orders from a variety of entertainment venues this way, many of them mail order.

As noted in my previous post, here is the same advertisement that appeared in both Ohio and Texas newspapers during 1882:

Advertisement in Cincinnati Enquirer, April 15, 1882.

2. The second way was sending salesmen from town to town; this was to making cold calls today. Many of the “salesmen” were intimately familiar with the design and mechanical requirements of a stage, also filling in as scenic artists and stage carpenters. In many cases, the salesmen focused on the sale of advertising curtains (drop curtains with ad spaces for local businesses). After collection payments from local businesses for an ad space, the drop was gifted to the community. Ultimately, their “ad drop” was so successful that it resulted in stock scenery work.

3. The third way was word of mouth. As the firm gained a national reputation, their scenery was sought after by theater managers who became familiar with their work. For example, Manager Mosely recommend Sosman & Landis for the project at Myer’s Opera House in Janesville, Wisconsin (Janesville Daily Gazette 23 Oct. 1883, page 4).

4. The fourth way was using their employee’s networks. For example, they targeted venues with an employee’s scenery, offering to “redeliver” new scenery for the stage. This familiarity with a particular individual and their work helped Sosman & Landis reach into new areas. As with establishing regional branches, local connections mattered. The firm immediately established regional offices in Dallas, Kansas City, Detroit, New York, and Cincinnati by the mid-1880s. For Cooke’s Opera House in Grayville, Illinois, the settings were installed by employee August Kreis, a machinist who spent his childhood in the area. On June 22, 1883, Evansville Courier and Press reported, “The scenery which is very elegant was painted by Messrs. Sosman & Landis of Chicago. The settings and its stage were arranged by Mr. August Kreis, a Grayville boy, and shows taste and skill” (page 4). Over the years, Sosman was also remembered as “a Macomb boy,” despite having left the area decades ago. These histories greatly mattered when competing for work in small towns and rural areas.

5. The fifth way was responding to call for bids on an upcoming project. These were also instances where local ties could sway a vote. On Saturday, August 30, 1884, the Chicago Tribune published an announcement from the Academy of Music in Saginaw, Michigan (page 15). It was a call for “Sealed Proposals” on upcoming theatre work.  The announcement stated, “Sealed Proposals will be received till 12 o’clock noon Sept. 1 for the following work on the new Academy of Music at East Saginaw, Mich.:

1st – Work and materials to complete the private boxes and proscenium front according to plans and detail drawings.

2nd – Scenic and stage work.

3rd – Carpets, draperies, matting, and window shades.

4th – Brass-work, tiling, and material trimming

5th – Decorating

6th – Gas-fixtures and electric lighting of same

7th – Interior painting, gilding, and bronzing

Proposals will be received for the whole or any part of the above work.

Proposals to be sent to E. H. Morely, East Saginaw, Mich. Committee reserve the right to reject any or all proposals. Plans, specifications, and detail drawings can be seen till Saturday, Aug. 30, at 111 and 113 Wabash-av. Inquire for B. W. Wood. Architect to be consulted as to the colors, etc.

(signed, J. M. Wood” (page 15)

Earlier that year, Wood had become lessee of the Blake hotel, of Racine (The Daily Journal and Republican 28 May 1884, page 4). He would go on to form a brief association with Sosman and Landis, known as Sosman, Landis, & Wood. Having an employee with architectural experience was key.

6. The sixth way was establishing an affiliation with a particular theatre architect. In addition to Co. J. M. Wood, Sosman & Landis employees H. C. Barrow. Barrow had experience as a stage carpenter, scenic artist, architect, contractor, and salesman. In many ways, he was a jack-of-all-trades; certainly as asset to the firm. Over the years, Sosman & Landis would form alliances with regional architects, but also offer their own architectural services for the construction of stage houses. In fact, they later offered free stage houses designs, if their scenery was installed at the venue. This was a wonderful way to ensure that the stage machinery was in working order when the scenery arrived for installation.

Below is a list from 1883-1884 mentioning the firm’s sales, work and installations. In some cases, a specific individual employed by the firm is named, and his work described in detail. Please consider this a small sampling of their work. In 1884, the firm was credited with delivering scenery to 150 opera houses. In 1889, the firm was credited with delivering scenery to 1000 opera houses across the United Stated. In 1894, the firm was credited to delivering scenery to 4000 opera houses. No one could compete with their track record. Sosman & Landis was a firm known all across the country, greatly respected for their high-quality of scenic art, mechanical innovation, and their consistency to deliver an excellent product.

ALABAMA

Gadsden, 1884 – Opera House (Corey, stage carpenter)

ARKANSAS

Fort Smith, 1883 – Academy of Music (Barrow, salesman)

Little Rock, 1883 – Capital Opera House (Barrow, salesman)

On August 12, 1883, the Daily Arkansas Gazette reported, “The Capital Opera house is to have a new drop curtain immediately. The scene to be represented upon it is that grand old conception of the Roman chariot race, and when completed the curtain will be one of the finest in the state. Mr. H. C. Barrow, representing Sosman & Landis, of Chicago, at whose studio the work is being done, is in the city, and states that he also has orders for the curtain for the Pine Bluff Opera house, the Fort Smith Academy of Music, the Van Buren theater and Ghio’s at Texarkana.”

Pine Bluff, 1883 – Opera House (Barrow, salesman)

Texarkana, 1883 – Ghio’s at Texarkana (Barrow, salesman)

Van Buren, 1883 – Opera House (Barrow, salesman)

GEORGIA

Columbus, 1884 – Springer Opera House

On June 4, 1886, the Columbus Enquirer Sun reported, “Mr. H. C. Barrow, of Chicago, was in the city yesterday, endeavoring to secure the contract to place the new scenery in Springer Opera House. Manger Foley has not given him an answer to his proposition yet.”

ILLINOIS

Bloomington, 1884 – Durley Theatre

Chicago, 1884 – Standard Theatre

On Jan. 13, 1884, the Chicago Tribune reported, “The painting is by Sosman & Landis, and everything, from the elegant new curtain to the smallest property, is thoroughly first class…The scenery is beautiful and effective and elicits the admiration not only of the audience, but of the theatrical profession as well. It was done by the Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio, 277 and 279 South Clark Street, a firm who have almost a National reputation for artistic work. They are now putting scenery in the new Lyceum Theatre, and during last season put scenery in the new Gillis Opera-House, Kansas City, Mo., and a number of others, besides supplying upwards of 150 smaller opera houses and halls” (page 6).

Chicago, 1884 –  Lyceum Theatre

Decatur, 1883 – Opera House (Graham and Young, scenic artists)

On June 27, 1883, the Decatur Daily Republican reported, “Mr. John H. Young, the water color artist of Chicago, has arrived in the city and will form a class on Thursday afternoon of this week for th purpose of giving instruction in making sketches from nature. Mr. Young may be found either at the opera house where he is engaged painting scenery, or at Drake’s Hotel. The artist will give lessons on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons each week during his stay of four weeks in Decatur.”

Grayville, 1883  – Cooke’s Opera House (Kreis, installer).

Streator, 1883  – Plumb Opera House (Strong, scenic artist).

On July 29, 1883, The Daily Commonwealth of Topeka, Kansas, announced that the house was rapidly approaching completion, and when finished it would be “one of the prettiest in the West.”

Joliet, 1883   – Opera House (Strong, scenic artist).

On July 7, 1883, The Ottawa Free Trader credited Strong as the scenic artist (p. 5)

Aurora, 1883  – Opera House  (Strong, scenic artist).

On June 24, 1883, The Inter Ocean reported that David A. Strong “had painted a fine drop curtain for the Opera House at Aurora. He will go to Aurora and devote his attention to the scenery of that house during the present week. The Opera House is to be remodeled and put in shape for first-class attractions” (page 13).

Decatur, 1883 – Opera House (Graham and Young, scenic artists).

On July 28, 1883, The Herald-Dispatch reported “The exhibition of the new scenery at the opera house last evening was highly satisfactory. The favored few who were present saw even better scenery that they had expected. The drop curtain is a copy of Jerome’s celebrated painting of the Roman chariot race. The ‘back drops’ included the following scenes: an ideal mountain landscape’ a ‘palace drop,’ which is really the scene under the dome of St. Peter’s cathedral at London; a ‘palace arch drop,’ which is used in connection with the foregoing and to give it a changed appearance; a ‘marine drop,’ presenting a pretty sea view. The ‘flats’ include the following views: a dark wood, a light landscape, a palace garden, a street in perspective, a modern drawing room, a rustic kitchen, a prison and a plain chamber. All these scenes have the requisite borders and wings. Below is given a list of what the painters call ‘set stuff,’ i.e. pieces which are placed in stage alone and braced, not being made to run in grooves or drop from above. The list embraces a garden walk, a garden balustrade, a ‘set house,’ a ‘set cottage,’ ‘set waters,’ ‘set rocks’ and ‘set trees.’ L. L. Graham, the scenic artist, has been engaged in this work for three weeks. He has been assisted by John H. Young, of Chicago. Mr. Graham has had 17 years of experience in this line of painting. He and his assistant left last night for Chicago, whence they go to do the same kind of work at Boyd’s opera house in Omaha, and finally at the New Gillis opera house in Kansas City, the largest in the west, which has just been built at a cost of $175,000. Of Mr. Graham’s work in the opera house, we need only speak briefly, His work shows that he has greatly improved during the years since he painted the former scenery. In the painting of his landscape views, he is almost perfect. The coloring is natural, and the lights and shades are arranged with an artistic taste. In the painting of animal, however, he is not so happy. Two of the horses’ heads in the scene on the drop are perceptibly ‘off’ in shape, but with this exception the view seems perfect. He is accurate and painstaking in his views of house, streets, palaces and gardens. We of Decatur are to be congratulated that he has come among us, for his work on the opera house scenery will give to the drama enacted there this year a realism and vividness which we have never heretofore known” (page 3).

INDIANA

Edinburgh, 1883 – Tracy’s Opera House

On Dec. 6, 1883, The Edinburg Daily Courier reported, “grand and magnificent scenery, gotten up by Messrs. Sosman & Landis, of Chicago” (page 4).

IOWA

Waterloo, 1884 – E. W. Burnham’s new Opera House (Strong, scenic artist).

On October 8, 1884, The Courier reported, “A Splendid Job. – E. W. Burnham yesterday showed us the new drop curtain which he has just received for the opera house. It is from the studio of Sosman & Landis, of Chicago, where the rest of the new scenery is being made and was painted by Strong the scenic artist of Haverly’s theatre. In artistic design and execution, this curtain can hardly be excelled in any city theatre, It represented a Swiss River scene as a picture, framed in a heavy frame, with handsome velvet curtain on each side. The combination of colors makes a rich and very beautiful effect and the whole curtain displays great artistic excellence” (page 8).

KANSAS

Sabetha, 1884 – Armory

On Jan. 3, 1884, the Sabetha Weekly Herald  announced, “Sosman & Landis have agreed to positively have the scenery into position, at the Armory, by the 15th.” Then, as now, not all jobs ran smoothly, or were delivered on time. Over the years, scenery was both damaged and lost in transit.  Occasionally, these unfortunate incidents results in court cases. As previously stated, the average profit was so high that they could afford to take a loss, without having to waste time on expensive court cases. That being said, demand for painted scenery was greater than the supply of artists or studio, giving the firm an upper hand in negotiations.

Sabetha, 1883 – GAR Hall

On Dec. 6, 1883, the Nemaha County Republican reported, “The scenery for the stage has been contracted from Sosman & Landis, of Chicago. It will be about the same as used at Seneca, except the drop curtain, which will be much finer” (page 7).

Seneca, 1883 – Opera House

Topeka, 1884 – Union Hall  

Wyandotte, 1883 – Dunning’s Hall

On May 17, 1883, The Wyandotte Herald reported, “The scenery and drop curtain were painted by Sosman & Landis of Chicago” (page 3).

MASSACHUSETTS

Haverhill, 1884 – Music Hall (scenic artist, Tryon).

On August, 2, 1884, the Deseret News of Salt Lake City, Utah, reported, “Henry C. Tryon, formerly scenic artist of the Salty Lake Theatre, whose productions are so much admired by the theatre-going public of this city, lately executed a splendid specimen of his skill at the Music Hall in Haverhill, Mass. It is in the form of a new drop curtain, the subject being a scene at Bellagio, on Lake Como, Italy. The Haverhill Gazette asserts confidently that ‘a more artistic production of its kind does not now hang behind the proscenium of any theatre in the country.’ It must be indeed superb if it excels the curtain executed by the same artist for the Salt Lake Theatre, which delights all who look on it with artistic eyes.” (page 2).

MISSISSIPPI

Vicksburg, 1884 – New opera house (Corey and Barrow, stage carpenter and scenic artist).

On July 10, 1884, The Vicksburg Herald reported, “Mr. Henry C. Barrow, scenic artist representing the big scenery house of Sosman & Landis, of Cincinnati, arrived here yesterday, to contact with Messrs. Piazza & Botto, proprietors of the opera-house, for a new set of scenery for that building” (page 4).

Aberdeen, 1884 – Masonic Temple Opera Hall (Corey).

On Sept 19, 1884, The Vicksburg Herald reported, “The Opera-house. Messrs. Piazza & Botto, proprietors of the Opera-house have determined to send to Chicago for the stage carpenter to put up the stage settings. A man was telegraphed from some days ago and he is expected to arrive here this morning and will begin work at once putting up the scenery and arranging the house for the opening of the season. The drop curtain will be a new departure in this vicinity. In the center of it will be handsomely painted a beautiful landscape while surrounding this will be twenty spaces which will be devoted to advertising, the lettering on the advertisements will be tastefully and handsomely done by the best of scenic artists. Only about five of the twenty spaces which compose the inner border of the curtain remain untaken, and these will be filled to-day and the curtain will be ordered at once” (page 4).

On Sept. 23, 1884, the Vicksburg Evening Post reported, “Mr. Charles W. Corey of Chicago, the stage carpenter engaged by Messrs. Piazza & Botto, arrived by this morning’s train. He is much pleased with the appearance and arrangement of the new Opera-house, and says it will make decidedly one of the handsomest places of amusement in the South. He says it is one of the nicest arranged places for an Opera-house he has seen elsewhere in the South. Mr. Corey will proceed with work at once, and says that there will be no delay whatever from now on in pushing the work to a rapid and satisfactory completion. The managers of the Opera-house state that Mr. Corey has a big reputation as a stage carpenter, and that they are charmed with his favorable opinion of the house, because his opinion is that of a man who has splendid experience in such matters and knows what he is speaking about” (page 1).

On October 24, 1884, The Vicksburg Herald reported, “Mr. Frank Corey, the stage carpenter has about finished his labors on the new opera-house and yesterday hung the new drop curtain, which can double discount the old one with greatest safety. A richly painted border in fancy colors, surrounds a fine representation of the noted Roman chariot race, and majestic horses being defected near life size in the canvas and appearing as natural as the brush held by an artistic painter who did this work. The delicate shadowing is done beautifully and the richly folded draperies surrounding the grand stand from which the Roman emperor of old is represented as viewing the race, set-off to advantage the fine figures as they are grouped together in the stand. Altogether the scene is a thrilling one, beautifully done, and the eyes of those frequenting opera-house will invariable rest on it with uninterrupted pleasure” (page 4).

MISSOURI

Kansas City, 1883  – New Gillis Opera House (stage carpenter, Hagen, with scenic artists Graham, Young).

NEBRASKA

Fremont, 1884 – Bullock’s Opera House

On June 18, 1884, the Fremont Tri-Weekly Tribune reported, “The drop curtain is 25 feet square and was painted in Chicago by Sosman & Landis; there are seven new sets of scenery and a Saunders gas machine with 12 border and 12 footlights to illuminate the stage” (page 7).

Omaha, 1883  – Boyd’s Opera House (Graham and Young, scenic artists).

NEW YORK

Delhi, 1884 – Opera House

On July 2, 1884, the Delhi Delaware Gazette reported, “The following is a list of the stage supplies, ordered from Sosman & Landis, of Chicago, the largest house of its kind in America: An elegant and artistic drop curtain; parlor scene; kitchen scene; plain chamber scene; prison scene; wood scene; garden scene; street scene; 2 front wings’ 6 parlor wings; 6 kitchen wings; 6 wood wings; 1 grand drapery border’ 3 sky borders; 1 set cottage; 3 set rocks; 1 set bridge; 2 set balustrades; 2 set garden vases. The building will be completed about the middle of August, and the grand opening will occur about the 1st of September” (page 3). All told, Sosman & Landis delivered a drop curtain and 7 complete sets, with 43 pieces (Oct. 1, 1884 in Delhi Daily Gazette).

PENNSYLVANIA

Irwin, 1884 – Opera House   

On Jan. 2, 1884, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported, “The stage scenery came from the popular firm of Sosman & Landis, Chicago” (page 8).

Tunkhannock, 1883 – Opera House

On Oct. 19, 1883, the Tunkhannock Republican reported, “The manager of the Opera House, F. H. Piatt…has ordered new scenery from Sosman & Landis, well known scenic artists of Chicago, which he expects to put up soon” (page 3).

TEXAS

Austin, 1883  – Opera House

On July 5, 1883, Austin American-Statesman reported, “Mr. H. C. Barrow, from the celebrated scenic studio of Sosman & Landis, Chicago, was in our city yesterday for the purpose of consummating arrangements with Manager Millett for additional scenery to the already large stock of his opera house” (page 4).

Burnett, 1884 – New Opera House

On March 11, 1884, the Austin American-Standard reported, “Messrs. Sosman & Landis of Chicago, are painting the scenery for our new opera house” (page 1).

Dallas, 1884- Opera House (Barrow, salesman).

On Aug. 20, 1884, The Herald announced, “Henry C. Barrow, scenic agent, and opera-house architect and contractor, is in the city” (page 4).

Fort Worth, 1884 – Opera House (Barrow, salesman).

On May 19, 1884, The Fort Worth Daily Gazette identifies Henry C. Barrow as “opera-house architect, and contractor, of Dallas” (page 8)

Galveston, 1884 – Opera House (Barrow, salesman).

On June 3, 1884, The Galveston Daily News reported, “H. C. Barrows, scenic agent, of Chicago, is in the city, and gave THE NEWS a call yesterday. He comes to put in a bid for refitting the Opera House” (page 8).

Jefferson, 1883  – Taylor Opera House (Barrow, scenic artist).

On March 1, 1883, the Tri-Weekly Herald reported, “Mr. H. C. Barrows, scenic artist from Chicago, just has completed for the Taylor Opera House, in Jefferson, one of the handsomest stages and scenery to be found in Texas. There are fifteen scenes in all, embracing two beautiful drop curtains, ten regular scenes, and a number of set pieces, set house, garden wall, balustrades, &c. Mr. B. has also done some beautiful frescoing on the Proscenium front, In company with a number of Jefferson gentlemen, we visited the Taylor Hall yesterday morning, all of whom were delighted with the work. It cannot be excelled in artistic finish, completeness and excellence of prospective, equaling the best scenery in large cities. Mr. Barrow has just completed Ghio’s Opera Hall, at Texarkana, and is likely to capture every place he goes to where stage scenery is required. It is admirable. We repeat: there has been nothing like it in Texas before Mr. B.’s advent” (page 2).

On March 6, 1883, the Tri-Weekly Herald reported, “Mr. H. C. Barrow with Sosman & Landis scenic studio, of Chicago, Ill. Is here and will soon refit our opera house with a full set of scenery and new drop curtain with advertisement of our leading business firms painted thereon” (p. 3).

Marshall, 1883  – Opera House (Barrow, scenic artist).

WISCONSIN

Janesville, 1883  – Myer’s Opera House (Buhler, scenic artist).

Oshkosh, 1883  – Opera House (Graham and Moses, scenic artists).

It is understandable that Sosman & Landis recognized their employer’s high profit margins, as opportunity to share the profit if one were willing to strike out on their own. Like Moses, others briefly left the firm and establish their own scenic studios. In many cases, Sosman & Landis continued to work with these former employees, often offering them an incentive to run the firm’s regional office, in addition to their new business. Such was the case with the new scenic studio of Graham & Davis in 1884. Lem L. Graham and Will P. Davis left Sosman & Landis to establish their firm in Kansas City, Missouri. They never directly competed against their former employer, and often represented the firm in western projects. In other words, they also ran the Kansas City branch office for Sosman & Landis. However, it appeared to the public as two completely separate entities.

In 1883 Graham had become quite well-known in the Kansas City area when his name made headlines in 1883. That year, Sosman & Landis landed the contract for the new Gillis Opera House. On Sept. 8, 1883, The Kansas City Star reported, “As stage carpenter, Mr. Claude Hagan, one of the most expert in his profession in the country, has been engaged. He has been employed in the best theaters in the country for years and last year traveled with the Hanlons who required the most complicated stage machinery. He superintended the setting of the Gillis stage, and it is said that what he don’t known about a stage isn’t worth knowing. Mr. Lem Graham is the scenic artist and none who see the scenery exhibited at the Gillis will for a moment doubt his ability” (page 1). Graham and Hagen continued to work together, both continuing their association with Sosman & Landis.

With Graham and Davis’ departure, there were two new openings in the scenic department at the firm’s main studio in Chicago.  Henry C. Tryon and Charles Boyer joined the paint staff in 1884. Tryon had recently left a position at The Salt Lake Theatre in Utah. Tryon, his brother Spencer, and William Morris, had painted new scenery for the renovated space.  Tryon left Salt Lake City mid-September 1883. On Sept. 17, 1883, the Deseret News announced, “Good Bye – Mr. Henry C. Tryon, the skillful scenic artist, leaves for the East to-morrow. Besides his remarkable talent he is the innate possessor of a genial disposition and a mind remarkably free from that species of petty jealously by which otherwise capable men too often dim the luster of their capacities. He has made numerous friends here whose best wishes he carries with him. Good bye” (page 3).

As their shop was staffed with well-experience individuals, both Sosman and Landis took to the road, securing even more orders and scouting for new employees. A few of their travels were mentioned in newspapers as arrivals at local hotels. For example,

On March 24, 1883, The Osh Kosh Northwestern reported, “Perry Landis, the scenic artist from Chicago, visited the studio of Edmund Osthaus and his sister, when here, was so much pleased with the flower work by Miss Mary Osterhaus that he gave her an order for a large piece of work. He pronounces her painting excellent” (page 4).

While business increased at the studio, friendships blossomed among the staff. On June 15, 1884, Sosman & Landis scenic artists Moses, Young, Morange and Maratta went on a sketching trip to Colorado. Moses published in the Palette & Chisel newsletter years later. His series of five articles was entitled “Tom Moses’ Trips: Breckenridge, Col.” Early in 1884, Thomas G. Moses accepted quite a bit of “night work” that subsequently funded his travel that year.  At the time he was twenty-eight years old. The ages of his traveling companions were as follows:  John H. Young (26 yrs.), Edward A. Morange (19 yrs.), and Hardesty C. Maratta (20 yrs.).

I have written about this trip over the course of several posts in the past, but here is the beginning of his story as it provides a reason for the adventure. Moses wrote, “John H. Young, Edward Morange, Hardesty Maratta and myself talked and planned for over a year regarding a trip to the mountains of Colorado. In our every day work of Scenic Painting we were called upon to paint all kinds of mountain scenes, and, as we had never seen a real mountain, we had to rely upon photographs or magazine cuts for our ideas. So we were, naturally, anxious to see the wonderful piles of rock and earth.” The four scenic artists travelled from Chicago to Breckenridge, staying for a few weeks in the mountains. In the end, Moses wrote, “On our return trip we looked like a bunch of tramps, happy and ready for our old work.”

Here are links my five posts about his trip.

In addition to forming close friendships with his colleagues, Moses also became attached to both Sosman & Landis. In 1884,  Moses moved to the same street as the Landis. Of the move, he wrote, “Mr. Landis prevailed on us to move to Centre Avenue, next flat to theirs. We did so, and it cost us considerably to furnish the flat, including a piano. We thought we deserved it; as the old one that was given to us as a wedding present had become impossible. We had saved considerable money.” Landis’ young wife was out of her element and in a marriage with a husband who was constantly on the road or planning with his business partner. She was from a small town without any support network. Moses’ wife Ella was also from a small town but had the benefit of small children and nearby in-laws. It makes sense that Landis would have also seen the similarities and hoped that Ella would help ease his wife’s discomfort in new surroundings.

This added a layer of complexity to Moses’ relationship with his employers. Although he would repeatedly strike out on his own over the years, Moses maintained extremely close ties to Sosman, Landis and their families.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Forum in Bronzeville, Chicago, Illinois, Sept. 28, 2023.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Forum in Bronzeville, Chicago, Illinois, Sept. 28, 2023.

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

The Forum Theatre on July 18, 2023.

Interior of the hall and stage at The Forum. Sept. 28, 2023.

A remarkable Sosman & Landis drop curtain was discovered on the south-side of Chicago this year.  On Thursday, Sept. 28, 2023, I scheduled a visit to examine it and other historic scenery at The Forum in Bronzeville. Located approximately six miles south of Chicago’s Loop, the building is situated on the northwest corner of East 43rd Street and South Calumet Avenue. It is immediately east of 43rd Street ‘L’ Station, making it very accessible from other areas of the city. The Forum is part of the Grand Boulevard community, with other Bronzeville communities including Douglas and Oakland. The stage is situated on the second floor with retail spaces below.

Here is a link to The Forum website: https://www.theforumbronzeville.com/

The Forum scenery collection first came onto my radar this summer. On July 18, 2023, Brian Traynor sent me a photograph with the text, “Guess what I’m looking at.” It was a Sosman & Landis signature on the corner of a drop curtain. 

Photograph texted to me by Brian Traynor on July 18, 2023.

This prompted a flurry of exchanges, with me asking for more information.  Traynor was at the Forum with Mary Margaret Bartley and several other Forum stakeholders. After visiting the Forum earlier that year, on an open house day, it was Bartley who set the wheels in motion to unroll and examine the drops with Traynor in tow.

On July 19, I spoke with Bernard Loyd, PhD, current owner of The Forum. He is also the founder and president of Urban Juncture and on the Build Bronzeville Team.

Bernard Loyd. Here is a link to his bio: https://www.buildbronzeville.com/bernard-loyd

Occasionally, you meet a person who radiates so much positive energy that they instantly draw you into their vision. That is what happened to me when I shook hands with Loyd and ascended the Forum’s grand staircase during my visit. The energy radiating from both Loyd and the building are palpable, creating an inescapable pull to this project as you envision the potential. You don’t even have to shut your eyes to imagine what this space once was, and what it could be again.

The Forum was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Here is a link to the report: https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/173ee985-447e-46a1-8654-a1ebfdae0bc1

Loyd’s fight to preserve the Forum from the wrecking ball is part of a much larger movement in within the neighborhood. In 2019, Three years later, the the Bronzeville-Black Metropolis National Heritage Area was established with the hope of preserving more than two hundred locations between 18th and 71st Streets. 

During my visit we unrolled the scenery and discussed the subject matter, use and current condition of the collection.

Michael Beavers and Brian Traynor preparing a roll drop for storage.

Here are the rolls of scenery that were discovered by Michael Beavers in the attic.

Loyd contacted Book Club Chicago journalist Jamie Nesbitt Golden to be there and possibly write a story about the significance of the painted scenes. Colin Boyle. Also, in attendance that day were Book Club Chicago photographer Colin Boyle, Michael J. Beavers, Brian Traynor, and Ayana Simone Loyd.

Left to right: Brian Traynor, Bernard Loyd, Colin Boyle, Jamie Nesbitt Golden, Ayana Simone Loyd, and Michael Beavers.

Here is the link to Jamie Nesbitt Golden’s article with pictures from our visit that day: https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/10/01/bronzevilles-the-forum-uncovers-century-old-hand-painted-scenic-theater-backdrops/

After our visit, Loyd followed up with an email to the group. It ended with his writing:

“I can’t help but comment on how the Forum drop seems like a perfect metaphor for both The Forum and the Bronzeville community, of which The Forum was a central hub.  They’ve all been challenged, battered, and all but discarded, but against all odds they’ve survived and they’re still incredibly rich and connected.  As we figure out how to tap into that cultural wealth and reactivate those dormant links, we will bring the drops, The Forum, and our community back to their full vibrancy.”

You may see why I am compelled to help Loyd and the Forum History Team. Seldom do I meet a theatre owner who immediately understands the cultural significance of the extant scenery.

My post could end here with some lovely shots of the scenic art. This is far too great of a cultural discovery to dismiss. For the past few days, I decided to do some extensive research for the Forum History Team, placing this scenery collection within the context of local, regional and national histories. 

This project also ties in with my current research regarding marginalized groups in technical theatre history, those that were often left out of theatre history books. For the past few years, I have been exploring the lives and careers of 113 Sosman & Landis employees, a firm that employed both women and people of color. When people were not included in written histories, it does not mean that they were not present.

The Forum Scenery Collection

The Forum’s historic stock scenery collection includes a drop curtain, landscape, street scene, grand border, and three sky borders (light blue).

Drop Curtain and grand border delivered by Sosman & Landis to The Forum in 1897.

Painted detail on drop curtain with extensive water damage.

Street Scene roll drop delivered by Sosman & Landis to The Forum in 1897.

Painted detail on street scene.

Painted detail on street scene.

Landscape roll drop delivered by Sosman & Landis to The Forum in 1897. Brian Traynor (left) and Michael Beavers (right).

Painted detail on landscape drop.

These seven tattered and water-stained pieces are all that remain of the Forum’s original stock scenery collection, delivered by Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio in 1897.

For context, when a stage does not have space above the stage to raise painted scenery, the only viable option is to used roll drops or framed shutters.

The Forum stage.

Here are a few example of a roll drop collections to help understand how these pieces were stored above a stage without a fly loft.

Roll drop collection in Danville, Virginia.

Roll drop collection in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Roll drop collection in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

End view of roller on a drop at The Forum.

There are a few miraculous moments that saved The Forum scenery. The first moment was when the scenery was lowered to the stage floor for a final time. It was carefully rolled, not ripped away from the top battens or bottom rolls. The second moment was when these scenes were moved to the attic for safe keeping.  It is amazing that the scenery was not either given to another venue or thrown away. Someone made the decision to keep the scenes and tuck them away in the attic. We may never know who the person was, or what their motivations were; however, I consider this unknown individual to be the first steward of the Forum scenery collection.

The third moment was when Michael Beavers discovered the dust-laden rolls and knew that they were historic theatre scenery. The fourth moment was when Loyd immediately understood that they were worth saving, signaling new stewardship.

Stage Scenery

I am going to start with the functionality of the drop curtain, and accompanying stage masking.

The drop curtain was designed to pair with not only painted top border, but also two side tormentor wings. Only The Forum drop curtain and grand border survive. Here is an example of a grand border and two tormentor wings.

Grand Border and Wings delivered to the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, by the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1902.

This top piece is also referred to some as a valance or teaser. Keep in mind that terminology varies from one region to another, and one decade to the next. When it was manufactured and installed by the Sosman & Landis studio, they termed the painted top piece as a “Grand Drapery Border.” Its listing in the firm’s 1894 catalogue included the following definition: “Made to represent rich and massive drapery and matches the drapery on the tormentor wings.”

The grand border delivered by Sosman & Landis in 1897.

Painted detail on grand border.

The measurement for the grand border and three sky borders were 30’-0” long.  The three sky borders were painted as a single 9’-0” x 30’-0” drop in the studio and then cut into the three pieces. The original size remains on the back of one sky border.

Charcoal notation with measurement for the piece of Fabric that was sent from the fabric room to the paint studio at Sosman & Landis. This was standard procedure throughout the firm’s history.

The catalogue described the accompanying side pieces:

“Tormentor Wings – Represent columns with elaborate base and rich drapery at top and side. These wings are stationary ones, set three or four feet back of and parallel with the drop curtain.”

Here is an example of a tormentor wing design, like what may have been paired with The Forum’s drop curtain and grand border. These three pieces (drop curtain, grand border, and tormentor wings) typically reflect the color scheme of an auditorium or hall, unifying all decorative elements.

Drapery detail on drop curtain. This color scheme was reflected in the extant grand border and would have been incorporated into the two missing tormentor wings.

Tormentor Wing Design. Twin City Scenic Co. Collection. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 16, 2023. https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll116:117

Tormentor wings were framed pieces that functioned as masking, to conceal the side stage. Working in conjunction with the grand drapery border, when the drop curtain was “out” (rolled up to reveal the stage), the three pieces framed all other painted compositions, such as the Forum’s landscape and street scenes.

A description of a standard drop curtain was included in the 1894 Sosman & Landis catalogue:

“Drop Curtain – Representing some romantic or historic view, with rich and elaborate drapery and gold frame.” The selection of “some romantic or historic view” often included popular artworks of the day.

It was quite common to replicate a painting or sketch, with the scenic artist taking a few liberties. Henry C. Tryon used William Linton’s painting, “A City of Ancient Greece – Return of the Glorious Armament” for the subject of the Salt Lake Theatre drop curtain in 1882. Tryon titled his drop curtain, “Return of the Victorious Fleet,” for the Salt Lake Theatre in 1882.

Illustration of William Linton’s painting (left) and photograph of Henry C. Tryon’s drop curtain for the Salt Lake Theatre (right). Both are from the Twin City Scenic Co. Collection. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives.

William Linton’s painting, “A City of Ancient Greece – Return of the Glorious Armament.”

Similarly, an artist at the Twin City Scenic Company in Minneapolis, Minnesota, designed a drop curtain with the central view replicating Thomas Moran’s “Sunrise on Ruins at Cuernavaca, Old Mexico.” Paint droplets still coat the copy once used by the scenic artist. Prints were readily available of his work and even included in the 1912 publication Three Wonderlands of the American West by Thos. D. Murphy.

A print of Thomas Moran’s “Sunrise on Ruins at Cuernavaca, Old Mexico” (left) and Twin City Scenic Co. drop curtain design (right). Both are from the Twin City Scenic Co. Collection. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives.

Here is an example from the Twin City Scenic Company Collection of the scenic artist’s source, the design and final drop curtain for Milton, North Dakota.

Print and corresponding drop curtain design. Both are from the Twin City Scenic Co. Collection. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives.

Realized backdrop by Twin City Scenic Company scenic artists for the Opera House in Milton, North Dakota. Photograph by Dr. Lawrence Hill.

Black and white photograph of Milton Opera House that shows more detail. Photograph by Dr. Lawrence Hill.

This brings us to the central subject on the Forum drop curtain – the Roman Forum.

The central composition of the drop curtain for the Forum. Painted by a Sosman & Landis scenic artist, currently unidentified.

The Subject

The composition is almost identical to the Stefano Donadoni (1844-1911) watercolor painting entitled “Foro Romano.”

It was his red signature (S. Donadoni) in the left corner that caught my eye; a signature with the same color and placement as the Sosman & Landis signature on the 1897 Forum Drop Curtain.  

Red signature by Stefano Donadoni.

Sosman & Landis signature on drop curtain and The Forum (left). Sosman & Landis signature on drop curtain for the opera house in Lisbon, North Dakota. This is the first Sosman & Landis signature that I have encountered in red.

This Donadoni watercolor painting has been repeatedly sold at auction over the past few decades. However, I found that in 2007, it sold as part of a pain.

Painting listed a Bonhams when sold as part of a pair in 2007. More recent auctions took place in Florida.

I located mention of an “S. Donadoni” painting titled, “The Forum, Rome,” as part of the Bath and West England Exhibition at St. Alban’s (Bathe Chronicle 4 June 1896, p. 6). I have yet to find an exact date for the painting. Nor do I have any indication of how many Donadoni paintings depicted the Roman Forum. However, Donadoni watercolor paintings are listed as part of exhibitions in English newspapers as early as 1893 (Western Morning News, Exeter, 25 Aug 1893, p.3).

Donadoni’s work was also known in the United States, kept in both private and public collections. For example. Donadoni’s “Castle of St. Angelo and St. Peter at Rome” was even listed for as part of an exhibition (the Wilbur Collection) at the Morgan Building in Buffalo, New York (The Buffalo Commercial 24 April 1900, p. 10 and The Buffalo Review 21 April 1900., p. 4).

As mentioned above, nineteenth-century scenic artists used illustrations, photographs and prints when replicating subjects for drop curtain composition. I have yet to find any concrete evidence of a scenic artist using an original fine art piece as a source during the scene painting. Part of this has to do with liability. Painting near an original artwork is also risky, for fear of platter damaging the work.

As with Donadoni’s watercolor painting, the Sosman & Landis drop curtain depicts the Roman Forum with several figures to for scale. The addition of figures in any composition helps the viewer understand the scope of a landscape or the height of a building. Such is the case with the Forum drop curtain.

Of the ten figures, four are located on Via Sacra (Sacred Street), the large main street of ancient Rome that led from the top of Capitoline Hill to the Colosseum, passing through religious sites and the Forum. Four are positioned in front of the Temple of Saturn (colonnade): one is looking back toward the Via Sacra; and three are gazing at the Basilica Julia ruins. It is extremely unlikely would be pointing to something outside of the picture. It is very telling that he is indication to the ruins of a public building that once housed meetings, shops, and hosted civil court cases.

What is truly remarkable about this active group is that they are not all white. This is the first time that I have ever encountered a grouping of black people on an extant drop curtain.  After closely examining the paint application, finish, placement, shadow work and the surrounding area, the inclusion of these three individuals appears to be original. I don’t believe that any of the figures were added after the painting was delivered.

These figures are so small that their race would not be discernable from more than ten feet away.

My hand next to the figures for scale.

Detail of figure.

Detail of figures on Via Sacra railing.

Detail of figures on beyond the Temple of Saturn .

Detail of figures on Via Sacra railing.

From another historical perspective, the Forum was the center of daily life in Rome for centuries. This was the setting for speeches, processionals, public trials, and gladiatorial events. It is now surrounded by the ruins of several government buildings. For many, this iconic space is the most celebrated meeting place in the world. In many ways, Forum Hall shared a similar function, with the drop curtain solidifying this connection. There is no mistaking that the subject matter for the curtain was based on past and present notions of “Forum” in 1897.

View of the Roman Forum from the Capitoline Museums in Rome. Here is a link to the photograph taken by Wolfgang Moroder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Forum#/media/File:Foro_Romano_Musei_Capitolini_Roma.jpg

The Forum Club

Forum Clubs were quite popular in 1897. Some were debate teams attached to colleges and universities. Others were literary organizations with guest lecturers. Other Forum Clubs were formed to discuss the state of inequality.

For example, on Saturday, Dec. 25, The Appeal in St. Paul, Minnesota published the following announcement:

“Prof. O. M. Woods in his report to the Forum Club, reviewed the ‘criminal status of the Negro race.’ He scored the convict system of the South, and cited facts and statistics showing the comparative length of terms served by white and Afro-American criminals for the same offense, and the alleged manner in which the entire administration of justice was so warped to the prejudice of the Afro-Americans that their condition in many states was rendered but little better than that of the slaves of ante-bellum days” (p. 2).

In 1897, there was also a Forum Club that met in Forum Hall. Purportedly it was a dancing organization, but I am suspect. On Sept. 12, 1897, The Chicago Chronicle announced “A new dancing organization, the Forum Club, has been organized on the south side, and will give its opening party at the Forum hall, Calumet avenue and Forty-third street, Wednesday, Sept. 29: (p. 40). Another announcement appeared later that month, providing a little more information about this new social organization. On Sept. 29, 1897, in the Inter Ocean announced:

“The Forum club, a new social organization of about 100 young men of the neighborhood, will give here a series of parties this season. Officers have yet to be chosen, and thirty more members will be elected.”

This Forum Club was an all-male organization with limited membership and elected officers, like any business or fraternal organization at this time. It is possible that the Forum Club was meeting for reasons other than dancing. However, advertising and meeting as a “dancing club” allows a large group of 100 young men to not only gather, but also publicly announce their gatherings without any repercussions.

When Forum Hall was built in 1897, there are several other aspects of American history to consider.  I’m going to start with the use of the word “Forum” in in the establishment of organizations dating from 1897.

The Forum Club of St. Louis

I am going to pause for a moment and look at the Forum Club of St. Louis, as it provides context withing the framework of American history in 1897-1898. At the time, the St. Louis Globe-Democrat described the organization’s membership as “leading business and professional men of the negro race” (13 Dec 1897, p. 10).

As noted in the 1897 Chicago Tribune newspaper article: “The Civic League will stand for good citizenship and be based somewhat on the Forum Club of St. Louis.”

The Forum Club of St. Louis was described in St. Louis Globe-Democrat on Jun 15, 1896, published an article entitled, “The Colored Contingent,” reporting “The Forum Club, a Republican organization, composed of over 1500 colored business and professional men of this city” (p. 9).  This was a gathering of African-American delegates for the National Republican Convention in St. Louis. Representatives from all over the country attended the event, including Hon. George W. Murray, described as “the only negro Congressman in the present House of Representatives.” On May 25, 1896, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch “The Forum Club, an organization of the leading colored citizens of the city, is making a special effort to properly entertain the colored delegates to the National Republican Convention” (p. 8).

There was a conservative backlash to this moment of progress across the country, including the African-American massacre and coup d’état in Wilmington, North Carolina. If you are unfamiliar with this Nov. 8-10, 1898 tragedy, event, visit the Cape Fear Museum page https://www.nhcgov.com/604/Wilmington-Massacre-1898 and examine the interactive map with details: https://nhcgov.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=5a4f5757e4904fb8bef6db842c1ff7c3

This stain on our democracy should never be forgotten.

The Forum Club of St. Louis responded to the tragedy. Newspapers across the country reported on their response. On Nov. 25, 1898, The Clinton Register of Clinton, Illinois, reported, “The Forum club of St. Louis has compiled as address to President McKinley asking him to recommend to congress such legislation as will do away with the massacre of negroes in the south” (p. 8). Here is the link to the “Address of the Forum Club, of St. Louis, Missouri, to Hon. William McKinley, President of the United States, November 1898” at the Harvard Libraries: https://curiosity.lib.harvard.edu/slavery-abolition-emancipation-and-freedom/catalog/74-990012311570203941

The Forum Club of St. Louis as a Model for The Civic League in Chicago, 1897

The founders of the Civic League in Chicago were from the city’s south side.

On Jan. 22, 1897, the Chicago Tribune published an article about the formation of an organization modeled after the Forum Club in St. Louis, Missouri (page 7). The article was entitled, “To Lift Up the African”, with subheadings “Chicago Colored Men will Organize the ‘Civic League.’ Body will make war on crime and degradation with the especial object of improving socially and politically the Black Race – Forum Club of St. Louis suggests the foundation lines – Dr. George C. Hall on a meeting for Sunday.”

The article continued:

“Representative colored men of Chicago are banding together for a war on crime and for the advancement, in all legitimate ways, of reputable representatives of the negro race. The organization, which will be formed next Sunday at No. 2718 State street will be known as ‘The Civic League.’ It’s president will be Dr. George C. Hall of No. 533 State street.

Interested with Dr. Hall in the new organization are T. W. Jones, W. W. Lytle, George Allen, Hannibal Carter, Dr. G. M. Crissup, Dr. A. M. Curtis, Dr. E. E. Barr, W. F. Taylor, and others. These men recently at No. 2718 State street and entered into a full and elaborate discussion of the negro problem.”

[I am going to pause here to mention that 2718 State Street was a building with retail space below and apartments above. In the early 1890s the retail spaces had included as saloon. The address was also listed as a 4th Ward polling place, and continued to be listed as such in 1908]

The article continues:

“As a step in the direction of settling it, it was decided to form ‘The Civic League.’ Dr. George Allen, T. W. Jones, W. W. Lytle, and T. J. Bowers were appointed a Committee on Constitution and By-Laws, and will report next Sunday. Discussing the aims and purposes of the proposed league, Dr. Hall said last night: ‘To the fact that the American negro has entered upon the second quarter of a century of his emancipation without having obtained full measure of American citizenship decreed to him by the Constitution it is unnecessary to give more than passing attention. Self-evident truths need no argumentative demonstration. What we mean to do is simply this: To take a survey of the relative position and importance of the negro citizen as compared with other citizens of this community in which he lives; and when we find two classes of citizens, under the same auspices, with equal  civil advantages, the one rising to a degree of almost unexampled power and eminence and the other sinking into a state of comparative obscurity, it is our determination to trace out the causes which have led to the elevation of one class and the depression of the other, and to use our most earnest endeavors to utterly extirpate whatever opposes the program and prosperity of any class of citizens in this country.

‘This survey we have casually made. We do not complain that our liberties are few, but that in this land of boasted freedom, where ability and good citizenship are the standards by which all the competitions of life are governed, the negro’s tenure of almost every public right is somewhat mutilated by arbitrary discriminations against him. In fact, in every race in which he enters he is first declared an inferior competitor and then handicapped and hobbled by an unjust race prejudice.

‘It must be recognized that the better the negro citizen can be, the better it will be for all classes of citizens. The negro’s grievance is that the better public citizen’s he tries to be these discriminations that are made against him are the most unbearable from the fact that they act as impediments not to his lower nature but to the aspirations of his higher nature.

‘As long as the negro is content to be a ragamuffin and a bootblack, frequent the vilest and lowest places of amusement, hang about the streets, shun all public places designed for the intellectual and moral welfare of the citizens, shun schools and colleges, keep out of professions and trades, no white man on earth could be much more free than he finds himself. But the moment he attempts to rise above such a life as this he is galled and tormented with ignominious discrimination against him as a public citizen, both by custom and (in some States) by law; and finally his mother, wife, his sister, and his daughter are encouraged to lead ignoble and are discouraged to lead nobler lives.

‘Many white men have had the honesty and boldness to step forward and proclaim the truth, while others have willfully traduced the negro, who proposes to stay in this country and is eager to be a citizen without any special rights or restrictions.

‘The Civic League is going to help the negro if it can, but not by pulling down the white man. It will make a feature of suppressing crime, and will act in full harmony with any existing organization which has for its objects the betterment of the whole people. Only by these means can the standard be raised.

‘We shall not demand anything, while we may respectfully request a number of things. We would like representation where labor of all kinds is employed, but we will leave it optional with the employer who he hires, contenting ourselves with giving endorsement of the league to a man we may decide is worthy to represent our race.

‘The Civic League will stand for good citizenship, and be based somewhat on the Forum Club of St. Louis. It’s officers will be business-men who can live without politics. If we cannot stop crime, we can locate the blame and fight that.”

On Jan. 25, 1897, The Chicago Chronicle announced,

“Civic League of Illinois

Colored Citizens Organize.

The Civic League of the state of Illinois was formally brought into existence yesterday afternoon at a meeting of colored persons held at 2718 State street. Thirty-two men in business and professional occupations discussed the methods to be employed by the new organization under the presidency of George C. Hall and voted on a constitution and by-laws and elected officers. The object of the league is to get the moral support of the north to enable the league to educate its kindred in the south and to endeavor to get trades unions to raise the bar they have placed against the admission of colored men” (page 7).

The same day, an announcement was made in the Inter Ocean published an article entitled, “To Educate Colored People” (page 8). It reported:

“The Civic League of the State of Illinois was formally brought into existence yesterday afternoon at a meeting of colored people held at No. 2718 State Street [3rd Ward]. Thirty-two men in business and professional occupations discussed the methods to be employed by the new organization under the presidency of George C. Hall, voted on a constitution and by-laws, and elected officers. The object of the league is to get the moral support of the North, to enable the league to educate its kindred in the South, and to endeavor to get trades unions to raise the bar they have placed against the admission of colored men. The league also expects to make the members of the race rejected by the white people in the communities in which they live. The following officers were elected: President Dr. George C. Hall; first vice-president, Hannibal C. Carter; secretary, Dr. G. M. Crissup; treasurer, T. W. Taylor. The board of directors will be selected at a future meeting, but it was determined to apply for a charter at once. The purposes of the league, as pronounced in its constitutions, are to foster and promote by every lawful use of the pen, the press, the mail, the law, the courts, by public assemblage and petitions, and by all proper stimulation of public sentiment, the legal and conventional recognition, establishment, and protection of all men in the common right of humanity, and of all citizens of the State of Illinois in the free enjoyment of every civic right, without distinction on account of birth, race, or private social status.

President Hall was very enthusiastic in his belief that the league would meet with success in its efforts. He said that it would not be allied in any manner in politics, except in the highest sense, and that the organization would aim to help the colored man in every possible manner. The roll members admitted yesterday contain the following names: J. E. Brown, George W. Lytle, Dr. SA. M. Curtis, S. J. Evanz, H. J. Bowers, H. S. Sanderson, R. W. Lacey, James H. Tillman, George D. Allen, E. J. Alexander, A. S. Cooper, H. M. Gibson, R. B. Cabell, and W. F. Tyler.”

Dr. George C. Hall, The Civic League’s first president

Dr. George C. Hall lived in Chicago’s 4th Ward

I am going to take a moment and examine Civic League’s first president, Dr. George C. Hall. He, and vice-president Hannibal C. Carter, both lived in Chicago’s 4th Ward; Hall at 3616 Dearborn and Carter at 3236 Dearborn. Although the ward’s boundaries continued to shift since formation in 1837, in 1887 the 4th Ward was bounded by Lake Michigan, 33rd and 39th streets and Stewart Avenue. Here is a map of the 4th Ward in 1900 when both Hall and Carter were counted in the census. Keep in mind that The Forum was immediately below the 4th Ward, in the top section of the 32nd Ward.

Image of Chicago’s 3rd and 4th ward in 1900. Image from Chicagology.com

In 1901 the ward was extended west to the Chicago River, where it would remain until 1923 when the City was divided into 50 modern wards.

Dr. George Cleveland Hall was born on Feb. 22, 1864, in Ypsilanti, Michigan, the son of John Ward Hall and Romelia Buck Hall. His father was a Baptist minister and the family moved to Chicago where Hall attended public schools. He matriculated at the Pennsylvania’s Lincoln University, graduating in 1886. He returned to Chicago where he received medical training at Bennett Medical College, graduating in 1888. In 1896 he graduated from Chicago’s Harvey Medical college, assisting in gynecology the nation’s first black-owned and managed hospital, Provident Hospital. The following year, he became president of the Chicago Civic League. His accomplishments are remarkable, and Hall is remembered for his many civic activities, including the founding of the association for the ASALH at the Wabash YMCA in Bronzeville with educators Carter G. Woodson, William B. Hartgrove. A. L. Jackson, and James E. Stamps. This later became the largest organization of black professional and public historians. From a medical standpoint, Hall remained active with Provident Hospital as a surgeon, trustee, chief-of-staff, and organizer of the first postgraduate courses. Hall also founded the Cook County Physician’s Association of Chicago, an organization of black doctors. This list of his accomplishments goes on and on.

Hannibal C. Carter, The Civic League’s first vice-president

H. C. Carter. His portrait was attached to his obituary in many newspapers, included “The Appeal” of St. Paul, Minnesota, on 11 June 1904, p. 4.

Here is a little information about this remarkable man. There are several biographies floating about with conflicting information. Here is what I have gathered from historic records and newspaper accounts. Keep in mind there were a few men living with the same name at the same time.

Capt. Hannibal Caesar Carter was born in February 1835 in New Albany, Indiana, the son of George Washington Carter and Ann Hill Carter. Although his family briefly moved to Canada, between 1837 and 1839, where two children were born, they returned to New Albany by 1840 where they were counted in the census. They were again listed in the 1850 census report for New Albany, Floyd County, Indiana. Interesting, in this census the occupation for Carter’s father was listed as “digging gold Cal.” In 1862, military records list Carter as a Captain in the 74th Regiment US Colored Infantry (Companies C and H). More information about his military history was detailed in The Appeal on July 25, 1891, “With his father he was on the Mississippi Steamer Vicksburg when the war broke out. This steamer ran on the lower Mississippi and a few days after Nutler occupied New Orleans, Carter, and his brother Edward made their way to him in safety. Shortly after they arrived, they petitioned General Butler to allow them to raise a regiment of Colored troops. This request was granted, and in October 1862, was mustered into the service….He was captain in the Second regiment Louisiana Native Guards, Corps d’Afrique. He assisted in the reconstruction of Tennessee, in 1867, and was elected from the Eighth congressional district in 1868. In 1868 he went to Mississippi and assisted in the reconstruction there. He represented Warren County, Miss., in the state legislature three times and was twice appointed secretary of the state. He was a candidate for congress in the famous district against General J. R, Chalmers …He removed from Vicksburg ten years ago and assigns as a reason that it ceased to be a healthy locality for a free man” (p.3). When Carter moved to Chicago, he was initially listed in directories as a clerk and notary. His 1906 obituary remembered, “He has resided in Chicago for over twenty years, and has taken a great interest in politics, and was quite an orator and political worker” (The Appeal, 11 June 1906, p. 4).

Here is a link for more information about the Corps d’Afrique: https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1st-louisiana-native-guard-usa-corps-d-afrique-1862-1863/

It is sometimes difficult to track down individuals who served with multiple regiments or those that were consolidated. For the record, in April 1864, the three Native Guard regiments (1st, 2nd, and 3rd Corps d’Afrique) were dissolved, and its members were placed in the newly organized 73rd and 74th Regiments of the United States Colored Troops. By the end of the war, there were 175 USCT regiments, constituting about -one-tenth of the army’s manpower.

I am going to briefly pause here and make a connection. Sosman & Landis were founded by Joseph Sosman (1846-1915) and Perry Landis (1848-1904), both Civil War veterans who fought with the Union Army.  Sosman’s older brother, Capt. William Sosman fought in the war for several years; his final commission being second lieutenant in the 106th regiment, U. S. Colored troops. Capt. Sosman’s son, worked as a scenic artist at Sosman & Landis during the 1890s. At one time most Sosman & Landis employees had fought in the Civil War. I have yet to locate any of their staff who were members of the Confederacy.

Here is the link to “Joe Sosman – From Solider to Sign Painter” https://drypigment.net/2022/12/18/sosman-landis-shaping-the-landscape-of-american-theatre-joe-sosman-from-soldier-to-sign-painter-1864-1874/

Here is the link to “Perry Landis – From Soldier to Salesman” https://drypigment.net/2023/06/13/sosman-landis-shaping-the-landscape-of-american-theatre-perry-landis-from-soldier-to-salesman/

Joseph S. Sosman (top left) and Perry Landis (lower right) pictured in their 1889 catalogue.

Albert Emmet Kent

On April 7, 1897, The Chicago Chronicle announced “S. A. treat has designed a two-story store and hall building which A. E. Kent proposes to erect at Forty-third Street and Calumet avenue. It will be 130×83 feet. The hall will have a seating capacity of 700 and the building will be furnished in the modern style at a total cost of about $20,000” (page 21).  A. E. Kent was Albert Emmet Kent (1830-1901), a well-known businessman who many considered to be the founder of the Chicago’s great meat packing industry. As remembered in his 1901 obituary, “Thirty years ago Mr. Kent was one of the leaders in the commercial life of this city. He was one of the organizers of the Corn Exchange and old Third National banks, and of the board of trade. He was also the originator of the optional system of trading, without which boards of trade would be impossible. But his greatest achievement lay in the founding of the great packing industries which have made Chicago famous the world over” (The Inter Ocean 9 Jan 1901, p. 3). His story is quite something.

For health reasons, Kent moved with his family to San Raphael, California, in 1871. By the way, he moved prior to the fire. Although he remained in the West Coast, his name continued to be listed in dozens of Chicago real estate transaction and building projects. His only surviving child, William Kent, had long charge of his father’s great real estate interests. In 1890, William became a partner in the real estate firm, A. E. Kent & Son, Co. Although A. E. Kent was listed as the owner of the Forum Building, it is highly unlikely that he participated in the planning or décor.  This was simply a profitable investment for his real estate firm, intended to be rented to local residents. The demand for popular entertainment and meeting facilities often surpassed the supply theaters. The Kents likely considered another factor when constructing the theatre – transportation. The South Side “L” began making stops at 43rd, 47th and 51st streets in the Grand Boulevard community. The 43rd street stop for the “L” line was right at the Forum Theatre building.  There is a fantastic page at the Encyclopedia of Chicago Website that examines the shifting demographic of residents and how Grand Boulevard became the “hub” of “Bronzeville.” Here is the link: http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/537.html

Samuel Treat

Now I am going to explore the career of The Forum’s architect, Samuel Atwater Treat (1839-1910), and his connection with Sosman & Landis.

On April 3, 1897, the Forum Building was described in an article for The Economist: A Weekly Financial, Commercial, and Real-estate Newspaper (p. 374):

“Samuel A. Treat, Fisher Building, has prepared plans for the improvement of the northwest corner of Calumet avenue and Forty-third street. The property is owned by A. E. Kent, and the plans show the entire frontage of 130 feet on Forty-third street and 83 feet on Calumet avenue are to be covered with a two-story building to be devoted to stores on the main floor. On the property immediately on the corner above the stores there will be erected a lecture and amusement hall, 61×64 feet. The auditorium will have a seating capacity on the main floor and gallery of about 700. It will be reached by two flights of stairs, the principal one being from the Forty-third street entrance, and the other from Calumet avenue. Dressing rooms for ladies and gentlemen will be provided and also a dining room and kitchen. The interior views show a tasteful and appropriate arrangement of the gallery, proscenium and inglenook. The building throughout will be heated by steam and the auditorium will be ventilated by mechanical devices. It will be lighted by incandescent lights. The cost of the building will be $20,000, and it is to be ready for occupancy September 1. The same architect is making extensive improvements in the building at 51 and 53 Plymouth Place for Mr. Kent.”

When Treat designed The Forum, he was 57 yrs. old.

Born on Dec. 29, 1839, in New Haven, Connecticut, he worked for the architectural firm of Sidney M. Stone after graduating from the Collegiate and Commercial Institute in 1856 (now known as the Russell Military Academy).

Link to the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Military_Academy#/media/File:Russell_Military_Academy_1860.jpg

This means that as a young man, Treat in the same town as Sosman & Landis scenic artist, David Austin Strong, nine years his senior. (1830-1911) In the 1850s, Strong worked as a sign painter, scenic artist, and stage manager at Homan’s Theatre, located in the Exchange building.

In 1867, Treat relocated to Chicago initially working with the form Randall & Co.  After the 1871 Great Chicago fire, he partnered with Fritz Foltz to establish Treat & Foltz. The two worked together for almost two decades. Foltz was extremely connected with the musical scene in Chicago during their time together. From approximately 1890-1910, Treat conducted his own business in Chicago. Less than a year after Treat’s passing, Strong also died.

Strong had moved to Chicago in 1874, working at various Chicago theaters until joining the staff at Sosman & Landis in by 1886, where he remained until his passing in 1911. Strong was extremely well known in the throughout the country, as was his employer. On Feb 28, 1886, an article in the Inter Ocean included his portrait and a short biography: “Among the oldest and best-known scenic artists in Chicago is David A. Strong, whose name adorned Haverly’s bills in the latter’s palmy days, but who is now in the Sosman & Landis establishment. He was born so far back that he skillfully dodges the issue when questioned as to the exact time. His professional career was commenced in Howard’s Atheneum in Boston twenty-five years back, He was then engaged several years stocking the larger New England theaters with scenery. He painted in the National Theatre in Washington for four years during the war. Then went to the Chestnut at Philadelphia, under Len Grover’s management, He then worked in New York at the Olympic and later at Niblo’s. While at the latter place with Marsden he got up the original scenery for the ‘Black Crook.” He then painted the panorama, ‘The Mirror of Ireland,’ famous in the East some time ago, and traveled with it for four and a half years. When Grover and Call opened the old Adelphi in this city, Mr. Strong was induced to come West, and has remained here ever since, working in several of the first-class theaters” (page 9).

David A. Strong pictured in 1886.

Meanwhile, Treat partnered with Fritz Foltz, and the two worked together until 1897. There is much more that can be written about Treat, but I am going to stop here, and 1897 forms another link with the Sosman & Landis Studio.

On Dec. 11, 1897, Treat was listed as an architect for the Western Electric Co. in The Economist (p. 665). The Western Electric Co. Building was located directly across Clinton street from Sosman and Landis Scenic Studio. They had shared a long history with Western Electric erecting its plant in 1883 and Sosman & Landis building their studio three years later. In 1893, Western Electric worked close with the scenic studio on several Columbian Exposition projects, including a large display in the Electricity building.

Western Electric’s Egyptian Temple Pavilion in the Electricity Building, Columbian Exposition, 1893.

For more information about this exhibit, visit: https://chicagology.com/columbiaexpo/fair041/

The Sosman & Landis studio not only included an electrical department, but the firm’s founders were instrument in establishing and operating the American Reflector & Lighting Company. In fact, Perry’s older brother, Joseph Landis, was the general manager. There is no doubt in my mind that Treat had worked with Sosman & Landis before The Forum project.

Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio, 1897

1897 was a big year for Sosman & Landis. It was their 18th year in Chicago, having first set up shop at 236-238 Clark Street. In 1886, they constructed a scenic studio that was advertised at the largest in the country.

The Sosman & Landis Studio on Clinton Street.

Interior of the Sosman & Landis studio on Clinton Street

Another view of the Sosman & Landis studio on Clinton Street, c. 1910.

By 1894 the firm had delivered scenery to approximately 4,000 theaters throughout North America.  By 1902, that number had increased to 6,000. In addition to stock scenery, the firm also painted spectacles for touring shows, grand circus spectacles, amusement park rides, world fair attractions, industrial shows, charity events, and more. I am in the process of writing the book “Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre.”

There was so much work coming into Sosman & Landis during 1897 that they had two studio spaces in Chicago, and several regional branches. The main studio was located on Clinton Street, with a second studio at the Alhambra Theatre. Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934), the firm’s first employee in 1880, oversaw the second studio, often referred to as The Annex. After Sosman passed away in 1915, Moses was elected president of the firm.

1897 projects included stock scenery for the Alhambra Theatre (Chicago, Illinois), the Overland Theatre (Nebraska City, NE), the Pike Theatre (Cincinnati, OH), the Valentine Theatre (Toledo, OH), the Grand Opera House (Columbus, OH), the Opera House (Deadwood, SD), the Opera House (Grand Rapids, Wisconsin), and the Cedar Rapids Highschool (Cedar Rapids, Iowa), to name a few. In addition to delivering painted illusion, draperies, stage machinery and lighting systems, they also painted settings for a variety of 1897 touring productions that included “Booming Town” (Phil W. Peters and James Brown), “Pulse of New York”, “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” (Davis Bros. Co.); “The Grand Duchess” and Amorita” (Kirkland Calhoun Opera Co.)

In addition to their theatrical supply and manufacturing firm, Sosman & Landis were also heavily invested in theatrical management. In 1897, Sosman & Landis were listed as managers of the Masonic Roof Garden Theatre (Chicago). They were also operating a second theatre agency with David H. Hunt, known as Sosman, Landis & Hunt. They leased the Pike Theatre in Cincinnati and ran a touring stock company, as part of the Western Circuit of Vaudeville Theatres.

Sosman & Landis’s electric scenic theaters at the Masonic Temple Roof Garden were even featured on the front page of “Western Electrician” on June 9, 1894.

Detail of Sosman & Landis’ Electric Scenic Theaters.

This brings us to the question: “Who was the scenic artist for The Forum’s drop curtain?” I am currently in the process of reconstructing the studio staff for each year, having already written biographies for 113 staff members. This is a project that I have been working on for decades. It just takes time.

Opening Forum Hall in 1897

The dedication of The Forum was announced in The Inter Ocean on Sept 29, 1897, reporting: “Opening of the Forum.

New South Side Social Center is Fittingly Dedicated.

The opening night of the Forum, corner of Forty-Third street and Calumet avenue, inaugurated last evening a pleasant addition to the South Side’s social centers. The new hall is large and well appointed, and the Forum club, a new social organization of about 100 young men of the neighborhood, will give here a series of parties this season. Officers have yet to be chosen, and thirty more members will be elected.

A mixed programme of music and recitations was the inaugural feature, and the attendance was quite large, especially of the people of St. Alban’s church, just around the corner on Prairie Avenue. Those contributing the entertainment were from this parish, and the rector, Rev. G. W. Knapp, lent his presence. There was an overture by the Wadner orchestra, a banjo solo by Master Scott Dowd, a song by Mr. G. St. John Knefler, a whistling solo by Miss Raney, a piano duet by Misses Edna Morgan and Maud Lightner, reading by Miss Carolyn Cook, solo by Master Tommy Anderson, and a song by Miss Eugenia Bayard, and at 10:30 came informal dancing. Among those who shared the enjoyable evening were:

Messrs. And Mesdames –

W.M. Speer, Thomas Edwards, J. D. Eaton, Morgan.

Misses – Grace Dodge. Rose Hess, Mable Hess, Bella Waller, Ethel Moody, Nannie Fetterly, Leofoldine Morgan, Edna Morgan, Laura Taylor, Jeanne Wilcox, Mary Webber.

Messrs. – Otto Langbien, John Morgan, Clarence Morgan, C. R. Cole, Ed Fetterly, G. P. Fetterly.

As with all theater openings, not everyone who attended a dedication was counted. Often, there is neither rhyme nor reason to who is included apart from entertainment and social standing.

As the building boasted a seating capacity of 700, I highly doubt that only a few dozen attended the opening. What I am certain of, however, is that this was an event primarily attended by locals.

I was able to track down most individuals listed above, with almost all coming from the 3rd, 4th, and 32nd wards. In fact, most were listed in the 1900 census report. This means that I was able to look at the neighborhoods to see the examine the demographics. Many of the street included both white and black families. This really is a project for someone to sit down and map out; the households from one street to the next. I think of the 2009 publication entitled “Suburban Promised Land: The Emerging Black Community in Oak Park, Illinois, 1880-1980.” There needs to be a book that looks at the emerging black community near the Forum.

Activities at The Forum

The Forum was identified as a “lecture and amusement hall.” When the hall opened in 1897, a variety of groups used the space. Interestingly, newspaper announcements were published by those renting the space, not managing the space. This is a little odd, and I would live to track down who was opening the building and turning the lights on.

I have examined the following events between 1897 and 1901: wedding receptions, evening dance classes, orchestral programs, Calumet Assemblies events, Republicans of the Thirty-second Ward meetings, Thirty-second Ward Democratic Meetings, Political rallies, Violet Club receptions, Progressive Club gatherings, informal dances, lectures, Carter H. Harrison meetings for the Thirty-second Ward, St. Elizabeth Institute receptions, The Young Ladies Guild of Holy Angels Church card party and receptions, Colonial Club elections, De la Salle Alumni association reception and cotillons, the Gibson Informal, and Englewood Union Hospital Alumnæ association receptions. There are likely many more groups that used this space.

Interestingly, the William Kent (son of owner A. E. Kent) was listed as an attendee at a Forum event in 1898. Kent attended a meeting of the Thirty-second ward Republicans who gathered for the denunciation of Allen Law; Kent was listed as an ex-Alderman of the 4th Ward. (Chicago Tribune 2 Jan 1898, p. 10). By the way, here is the link to the William Kent Family Papers in the Yale archives: https://archives.yale.edu/repositories/12/resources/4044 The scope and contents of the collection “document Kent’s career as a municipal reformer in Chicago and Northern California; his interests in conservation, recreation, and public control of water power; his campaigns for election to Congress; his service in the United States House of Representatives and on the United States Tariff Commission; and his business interests in cattle ranches in Nebraska and Nevada. The papers also include materials relating to the activities of Kent’s wife, Elizabeth Thacher Kent, her family, and the Kents’ seven children and grandchildren. Papers of Elizabeth Thacher Kent document her interests in women’s suffrage, the Equal Rights Amendment, and international peace.” This is a rabbit hole that I cannot go down at this time.

Fraternal Activities

I have only located one stage production that took place in 1897. On Nov. 20, 1897, The Inter Ocean described a three-act war drama as as part of Thanksgiving festivities (p. 374). The article reported,

“SONS OF VETEREANS.

Colonel Ellsworth camp, No. 87, will give a grand Thanksgiving entertainment Thursday evening at Forum hall, corner of Forty-third and Calumet avenue, consisting of a three-act war drama and exhibition drill by the Burns Military School cadets. The entertainment will be followed by a dance. The Sons of the Veterans of Austin will visit the camp and G. A. R. post at Oak Park next Thursday evening” (p. 11).

Colonel Ellsworth Camp, No. 87 represented the Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War, Middletown, Pennsylvania. This was an allied order of the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), intended to preserve the history and legacy of the veterans who fought during the Civil War. Here is a link for more information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_Union_Veterans_of_the_Civil_War

There was another fraternal activity that caught my eye when I entered the building for the first time – The Elks. There still is a door clearly marked with the Fraternity and C. A. Brown.

Improved Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the World at The Forum. This door likely led to the secretary’s office, as in most fraternal buildings.

The Forum also was home to the Improved Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the World (I.B.P.O.E. of W.). This is not the same as the B.P.O.E.  As Prince Hall Freemasonry, it was a fraternal order fueled by racial inequality.

Founded in 1898, the group is now considered the largest Black fraternal organization in the world. In 1906, Chicago Lodge No. 43 was incorporated by W. D. Langford, T. J. Wilson, and R. L. LaCasse (Chicago Tribune 22 Nov 1906, p. 13). I believe that the Lodge is now known as Great Elks Lodge No. 43 and have contacted the fraternity to confirm.

After a little preliminary research, here is what I uncovered about the three gentlemen listed in the 1906 announcement:

W. D. Langford, was listed as a physician listed in the 1907 Chicago Directory, practicing at 500, 39 State Street.

Ralph L. Lacasse (1861-1909) worked as a porter and usher. I was also able to find his will that listed his Prince Hall Masonic association (Garden City Lodge. No. 59) and membership with the Knights of Pythias (Hannibal Lodge). Here is a link to Prince Hall Freemasonry Archives with Garden City folders at the Chicago Public Library: https://www.chipublib.org/fa-prince-hall-freemasonry-archives/

Thomas Jefferson Wilson, Jr. (1877- 1963) worked as a porter for the Pullman company in 1900. That year he roomed with his first wife Anna B. at the Payton family home, 4731 Armour Avenue in 1900. He later worked as a clothing salesman, marrying his second wife Yolanda Charleston.

I remain uncertain as to when the I.B.P.O.E. of W. started meeting in the Forum, but I have located a newspaper article from 1944 that confirms they were situated in the building (Chicago Tribune 26 Aug 1944, p. 8). For more information about this fraternal organization, visit https://www.ibpoew.org/history If you do a little digging, there is a fascinating history out there.

In Summary

There are many historic scenery collections across the country that are important. Extant backdrops that are linked with significant people and events in American history. They connect performance venues to local, regional, and national histories, often allowing us to discover the people who created it, delivered it, manipulated it, performed in front of it, and saved it.

That being said, The Forum drop curtain is one of a kind; there is nothing else like it in North America. It should be used as a forum for discussing the past, present, and future.

Please spread the word that the Forum exists, that it has historic scenery, and that it needs financial support.

Again, here is a link The Forum’s website: https://www.theforumbronzeville.com/

To be continued…

.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Gaiety Theatre Act Drop by William T. Hemsley.

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Throughout my career, I have encountered examples of scenic art that took my breath away. My most recent experience occurred during a visit to the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House in Douglas, Isle of Man.

The act-drop, painted by William Thompson Hemsley (1850-1918), is exquisite.

Photograph by Mike Hume while I am attempting to document painted details.

It is obvious that Hemsley was at the peak of his painting career when he produced this large-scale artwork. Hemsley’s economy of brush stroke and color combinations are quite remarkable. In fact, they are inspirational. Seeing this drop should be on every scenic artist’s bucket list. You will learn so much about the brevity of scene painting when examining his work.

Detail of dancer’s foot in W. T. Hemsley’s act drop at the Gaiety Theatre.

This post will examine Hemsley’s drop in detail, placing it within the context of theatre history. It will also examine its current condition and past repairs. My next post will look at the life and career of scenic artist W. T. Hemsley (1850-1918). Then I will continue with my last two theater visits in the UK during September 2023.

As with most front curtains for Victorian performance venues, Hemsley’s design for the Gaiety Theatre unifies the auditorium’s color palette and décor. Although the central subject exhibits an exotic eastern theme, the painted surround seamlessly blends with the architectural surround and auditorium designed by Frank Matcham.  

Detail of painted curtain next to proscenium arch.

Detail of painted curtain next to proscenium arch.

I am going to briefly touch on theatre terminology first. Hemsley’s “act drop” design is identical to many “drop curtain” designs in the North America. Drop curtains, also labeled in the US as front curtains and main rags, were frequently lowered in between acts, unless an advertising curtain was employed. In many cases the terms act-drop, drop curtain, painted front curtain, and main rag can be used interchangeably. Terminology is based on where you live. It is very important to not get caught up in the name, but to look at the actual function of the scenic piece. I think of the dispute between “hot dish” and “casserole” in the United States. They are both a one-dish meal, baked in the oven. Same thing, different name.

Back to the act drop…

This type of scenic design frequently includes a central “painting” – one that often replicates a popular artwork or subject matter.  This central “artwork” is surrounded by an ornate frame, draped in lush fabrics. These drop curtains were often the pinnacle of an auditorium’s décor, tying everything together while concealing the magical realm behind the footlights. As audience members waited in their seats for the show to start, or the next act to commence, the drop curtain (act-drop) provided theatre patrons with an opportunity to study the grand work of a scenic artist. The proscenium opening became a gallery wall, providing many scene painters with an opportunity to flaunt their artistic abilities. Painting a successful drop curtain required extensive skill, as well as a thorough understanding of distemper painting techniques for landscapes, architecture, draperies, and, in some cases, figure painting.

There is an article entitled, “Well-known drop curtains in Philadelphia, published in The Philadelphia Inquirer on Dec. 18, 1894.” It examines the significance and subject matter of drop curtains at the time. The article describes the work of Matt Morgan, Russell Smith, William M. Voegtlin, Alfred Voegtlin, Hugh Logan Reid, E. H. Chase, Lee Lash, Gaspard Maeder, and Frederick Schaefer, are featured in the article.  Here is an excerpt from the article:

“The drop curtain is the most expensive piece of furniture in any playhouse. Managers are most solicitous about the care of a handsome drop curtain than almost any other appointment in the theatres. They are usually painted by the artists of wide fame in the peculiar branch of art which they represent, whose charges for the work range from $1000 to $3000…It is claimed by managers that a handsome drop curtain has much to do with the drawing qualities of the house. A charming landscape depicting the greenest of lawns, sparking fountains, rare shrubbery and bright flowers, the dimpled surface of a placid lake, with magnificent hills or rugged mountains in the distance to kiss the brightest fleecy clouds, forms an ensemble well calculated to put the audience in good humor to witness a play. And when let down between the acts, it has a tendency to calm the soul after turbulent passages and rouses it to cheerfulness after tearful ones.”

Only a small percentage of historic backdrops that I have documented include figures, especially on those dubbed drop curtains. Most recently, I documented an 1897 drop curtain for the Forum Theatre in Bronzeville, Illinois (a community on the south-side of Chicago).  The forum scene depicts very small figures to suggest the scale of their monumental surroundings.

Painted detail from Sosman & Landis drop curtain at the Forum in Bronzeville.

My hand showing scale of the figures on the Forum drop curtain.

The inclusion of larger, or full-scale figures, is extremely rare in extant scenery collections. In fact, the only times that I have consistently encountered figure-work is painted on scenes at Scottish Rite Theatres; specifically, group scenes for 18th degree productions. For context, many North American Freemasons theatrically stage their “degree work”, like a morality play. It is performed for the educational purposes of members. Here are a few examples from Scottish Rite scenes for context.

Painted scene by Toomey & Volland Studio (St. Louis, Missouri) at the Masonic Theatre in Deadwood, South Dakota.

Painted scene by Toomey & Volland (St. Louis, Missouri) at the Masonic Theatre in Quincy, Illinois.

Although some of the work is quite skilled, in some cases there have been few questionable choices. This detail of a foot may simply indicate the speed at which these scenes were painted. Keep in mind that most American scenic studio artists were working in a factory setting to mass-produce painted illusion.

Painted detail from cut-drop created for the Scottish Rite Theatre in McAlester, Oklahoma, c. 1908. This painted scene is now used at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Salina, Kansas, USA.

The Gaiety Theatre act drop holds a unique place in World Theatre History, when considering not only the artistic skill of Hemsley, but also the subject matter.

When I first encountered Hemsley’s design for the Gaiety Theatre, it reminded me of a drop curtain design by scenic artist John Z. Wood (1846-1919). At the time, Wood was working for the Twin City Scenic Co. in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Wood’s design also incorporated a dancing girl. Interesting aside, Wood was born in England and emigrated with his family as a young both, eventually settling in Rochester New York. For more information about Wood and his artistic style, here is a link to one of the many posts that I have written about him: https://drypigment.net/2019/12/10/tales-from-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-john-z-wood-scenic-artist-1846-1919/

Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Painted detail. Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Painted detail. Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Wood’s scenic designs are part of an online digital database.Here is the link to the design: https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll116:1819

Sadly, Wood’s central composition is somewhat obscured under a layer of glue; another central design was pasted over this original composition at a later date. The original work was discovered when the Twin City Scenic Company Collection was catalogued, under the supervision of my mentor, Prof. Emeritus, C. Lance Brockman. Between 1999 and 2000, I assigned metadata to each of the artifacts. My familiarity with four scenery collections in the online database has allowed me to help link designs with extant scenery over the years. Here is the link to access the collection in its entirety: https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/search?facet_field=collection_name_s&facets%5Bcollection_name_s%5D%5B%5D=Scenic+Collections

Although I have read descriptions of exotic eastern scenes for Victorian stages, few have survived. Here are some photographs of Hemsley’s act drop so that you can appreciate his skill and attention to detail.

Central dancer.

Dancer’s shoes.

Looking even closer at fabric and brush stroke.

Reclining man.

Hand detail of man in composition.

Detail of frame.

Fabric and frame detail.

Fabric and frame detail.

Painted detail of floral arrangement.

Painted detail of tapestry.

Another painted detail.

Painted fabric next to practical fabric.

Tassel detail.

Hemsley’s act-drop is the first fully-framed drop that I have ever encountered. It also meant that the cleaning of this act drop in the 1990s became problematic. The restoration team requested that the framed piece be relocated upstage and face the paint-frame floor. Roy McMillan describes the process in his book A Full Circle, 100 Years of the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House:

McMillan wrote,

“To carry out the work, the drop had to be removed from its fly-bar at the front of the stage, walked (that is, moving one end forward a few feet while the other remains stationary, then repeating the process with the other end) halfway to the back, rotated through 180 degrees, then re-flown and the cleaning done from the paint frame floor. When Mervin and David were releasing it from its fly-bar onto the floor, the side struts nearly buckled. The canvas ballooned out like a wind -caught sail; a few seconds more of the strain and the drop would have been gone forever…[They] managed to haul it back into its original position on the fly-bar and decided another method would probably be safer. It would, however, take more time.

They fixed the drop by three tie lines along a bar. It was moved back one side at a time, one bar at a time, with both of them clamoring up and down ladders to secure it or to untie it, to the center of the stage. Once there, two of the three ties were released, and the center left alone. The intention was to rotate it, so the painted side faced upstage and be attended to on the paint frame floor. But as they turned it, they realized that it was three inches wider than available. This was not a design feature of the drop or a miscalculation. It was because a bridge between the left and right side of the fly floor gallery had been built at the front of the stage, making it impossible to turn the drop round. This bridge was not in the original theatre and has since been removed to allow the house curtain to rise correctly, but it was very much present at the time. Faced with the choice of cancelling the first project of the restoration, or dropping the act drop onto the floor again, they chose a much more straightforward means of solving the problem. They cut a chunk out of the bridge…Once in position, the backing canvas was removed. On the painted side of the canvas itself, the copper-headed nails that held it to the frame had oxidized and rotted the canvas in the immediate area…Its delicacy meant it had to be repaired in situ and the frame rebuilt around it.”

The preservation of the painted composition is also described in McMillan’s publication. McMillan wrote, “In order to avoid glare when lit by the footlights the drop had to be painted in stage paint. This is a powdered water-paint mixed with size – a sticky, globby gel that serves as a fixative.”

[I am going to pause here to correct this statement. This drop was painted with distemper paint. The distemper painting process necessitates that dry pigment is turned into a paste and placed on the scenic artist’s palette.  Some artists in the UK refer to distemper painting as Size Painting. Regardless, during the painting process dry pigment paste is mixed with diluted hide glue (size) on the palette and directly applied to the drop.  The size cannot be used as “a sticky, globby gel.” If the size were this consistency, it means that it has been mixed too strong and will dry with a sheen, thus reflecting stage lights.  When size it properly mixed, it will not gel, unless a studio is kept at an abnormally cold temperature. In my humble opinion, there is no way, that Hemsley (then at the age of 50 yrs. old) would have made this amateur mistake. If he had, the whole drop would look like the painting were sealed with a gloss coat.

Here is an example of a restoration process that used size that was too strong and formed a sheen.

Scene at Scottish Rite theatre in Louisville, Kentucky.

McMillan continues to describe the restoration process:“However, as it was water-based, if the surface was rubbed, the paint smudged immediately,”

[I must explain that distemper -“water-based”- paint is not subject to dusting unless the binder has failed over time. There are hundreds of extant drops, c. 1900 or earlier, that show no signs of dusting and are stable.]

McMillan continues “To clean it required an intermediary layer between the surface and the restorer’s brush. It was achieved using mulberry tissue paper, infused with a liquid that caused the dirt to soften on the paint surface and stick to the paper, leaving clean paint of the original drop beneath.”

I am curious to know what about the “liquid.” I have cleaned hundreds of historic scenes cannot envision how this process worked. However, it may explain the extensive spotting throughout the composition.

Spotting that looks like small areas of water damage as there are tide lines and pigment loss.

Areas with spotting near the bottom of drop.

Spotting that looks like small areas of water damage as there are tide lines and pigment loss.

Spotting that looks like small areas of water damage as there are tide lines and pigment loss.

In the past, I have removed both surface contaminants and embedded dirt from extant drops. If the pigment is relatively stable (meaning that the binder is still working) surface contaminants are easily removed with low-suction dust extraction, Absorene putty, and/or Absorene sponges.

Example of removing surface contaminants with low-suction dust extraction.

Example of using Absorene sponge to remove surface contaminants left after low-suction dust extraction.

Half of a scene that was cleaned at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Duluth, MN.

If the pigment is severely dusting, the loose paint must be consolidated so that it does not continue to dust. This is when conservators debate whether to remove the dirt and cause minimal pigment loss or encapsulate the dirt when the loose paint is consolidated.

McMillan further explains, “if the surface was rubbed, the paint smudged immediately.”

I don’t really know how to interpret this statement. When distemper paint comes into contact with any liquid, even a damp cloth or humid environment, the paint will immediately reactivate.  This is why I don’t understand how “mulberry tissue paper, infused with liquid” works in removing surface contaminants from distemper drops.

If McMillan meant that the distemper paint smudged when dry, that indicates the binder was failing; the pigment dusting from the fabric.

Despite the hard work to preserve Hemsley’s work, the curtain is again compromised. There are a few scrapes that will need attention before the damage spreads, again compromising the longevity of the artwork.

Damage documented during my September 2023 visit. Thankfully, the cause of the scraping has been rememdied.

Detail of the damage.

Theatre backdrops are unique and cannot be preserved like large-scale paintings that hang in stationary positions on gallery walls. They are metamorphic in nature, intended to be constantly handled or shifted. That is magic of painted scenery; artworks that come to life under stage lights.

In early-twentieth-century North America, many stunning act-drops were replaced with fabric draperies, movie screens, or a combination thereof during the twentieth century, the original scenes long forgotten by theatre audiences. Instead of raising a painted curtain to reveal the mysteries of Thespis, heavy draperies were drawn apart to show a movie. The Gaiety Theatre has three front pieces:

Main draperies (that draw apart).

Hemsley’s act drop (also known as a drop curtain).

A contemporary advertising curtain (also known as an ad drop).

It is remarkable how each piece changes the energy in the auditorium. It is certainly a testament to the importance of what fills the proscenium opening.

My next post will be about the creator of the Gaiety Theatre’s act-drop, William T. Hemsley, scenic artist and sculptor. 

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Gaiety Theatre, Isle of Man, Sept. 17-18, 2023.

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk and I hopped a plane on the morning of Sept. 17, 2023. Our final destination was the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House in Douglas on the Isle of Man. 

Our descent to the Isle of Man on Sept. 17, 2023.

A view of the countryside between Douglas and the airport. When the sun comes out, it is paradise.

For quite some time, this theater has been on my bucket list.

Why?

Because of the drop curtain, painted by William T. Hemsley (1850-1918). It is absolutely exquisite, and one of the best examples of historic scenic art out there.

Drop curtain at the Gaiety Theatre.

For years, I have searched for detail images of Hemsley’s painting technique in online photos. My next post will look at the painted composition in detail.  This post is about everything else.

Our tour guide was Alex Davidson, Light and Sound Technician at Villa Marina and Gaiety Theatre. Both are located along the promenade in Douglas.

Mike Hume, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Alex Davidson and Rick Boychuk, in front of the Gaiety Theatre, Douglas, Isle of Man, Sept. 18, 2023.

For geographical context, here is a map with the location of the theater.

The theater is right near the red box that says ” You are Here.”

The garden across from the theatre, alongside the Promenade.

As the tide comes in later that day.

Another view of the Promenade later that day when the tide is in again.

A view of the theatre from the beach at low tide on the morning of Sept. 18, 2023.

Yes, we saw our share of rain. Especially when Mike and I went to visit the Laxey waterwheel on the morning of our second day in Douglas. By the way, Lady Isabella is the largest waterwheel in the world. Here are a few photos from our side trip.

The waterwheel in Laxey, Lady Isabella.

Another view of the water wheel.

Information about the water wheel.

Mechanical information.

But the sun came out by the afternoon. Back to the Gaiety Theatre…

Gaiety Theatre, Douglas, Isle of Man.

Designed by architect Frank Matcham, the Gaiety Theatre opened on July 16, 1900. It was constructed on the same site of a previous venue; an entertainment pavilion. Matcham’s design utilized many parts of the original structure, including the roof.

The Pavilion Theatre, Douglas, Isle of Man.

Interior of the Pavilion Theatre, Douglas, Isle of Man.

A portion of the Pavilion Theatre’s ceiling still remains in the gallery section of the auditorium.

Our visit to both the grid and dome above the auditorium ceiling gave us an opportunity to examine the original structure.

The original Pavilion Theatre roof and the Gaiety Theatre grid, with Rick Boychuk for scale.

Alex Davidson on the Gaiety Theatre gridiron.

Mike Hume next to the drum for the paint frame.

Drum for the paint frame below.

Above the auditorium dome, designed by Frank Matcham for the Gaiety Theatre. It was placed well below the original Pavilion Theatre roof.

Ornamental iron work remains above the current auditorium doom.

The original Pavilion ceiling was incorporated into Matcham’s design for the ceiling above the gallery.

Part of an original Pavilion Theatre arch was preserved in the stairwell.

Here are some photographs of the auditorium.

Grand drape at the Gaiety Theatre.

The ceiling of the auditorium.

Ceiling detail.

Auditorium boxes, house left.

Auditorium boxes, house right.

View from the house left box.

Another view of house right box and drop curtain.

View from the house right box.

Statuary near house right box.

More architectural details.

More architectural details.

Entrance to the Gaiety Theatre.

Behind the Main Drape.

Movable grooves, so that the wings can be angled.

Movable grooves, so that the wings can be angled.

Upstage. Notice the underside of the paint room and bridge.

Doorway to the paint room.

Paint room at the Gaiety Theatre.

Another view of the paint room.

Skylights for paint room. Alex pulled one of the shades. The angle of the light is perfect so that no shadows are cast on the frame when one is painting.

Movable paint frame.

Paint frame detail.

Paint room sink.

Windlass for the paint frame.

Another view of the windlass.

Under-stage machinery at the Gaiety Theatre.

Here are some images of the machinery below the stage.

Under-stage machinery at the Gaiety Theatre.

Under-stage machinery at the Gaiety Theatre.

The Corsican Trap at the Gaiety Theatre.

A working model of the Coriscan Trap.

A working model of the Corsican Trap. The model researched and constructed by Robert Stafford. The model was designed and painted by John Romayne.

The paperwork for the Corsican Trap Model with history and other information.

Under-stage machinery at the Gaiety Theatre.

Here is a link to see an 8-minute YouTube video of the Gaiety Theatre Traps in action, including the Corsican Model and Corsican Trap: https://youtu.be/-TyNJKbB88g?si=F7p7fEf_3Ah-K-Zh

If you are interested in learning more about this exquisite venue, please consider purchasing “A Full Circle, 100 Years of the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House” by Roy McMillan.  

Here is a link to the venue’s website:https://www.villagaiety.com/hire-us/gaiety-theatre/

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, Sept. 10-11, 2023

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

On Sept. 10, 2023, Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, Grit Eckert, and I visited the Drury Lane Theatre.

Hume had scheduled a backstage tour with Michael “Biglad” Burgess-Shaw Head of Stage, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The tour was remarkable, both entertaining and informative as we explored the extensive the backstage area.

Rick Boychuk, Grit Eckert, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Biglad, and Mike Hume backstage at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane.

A view from above the stage.

Although everything was fascinating, my favorite part of the backstage tour was visiting the old paint studio.  There is so much history spattered on the paint frames, walls, and floor. I have traced the careers of so many scenic artists who worked here. There is nothing quite like standing in the same spot where so many scenic artists, brush in hand, stood for decades.

The paint shop with four paint frames (two in the center).

Paint frame detail.

Paint frame detail, looking up toward skylights.

Next to the paint shop was the scenery storage area; now the main office.  Old drops (from a touring production of Oklahoma) now decorated only one wall, now the sole legacy of a space that once housed so many more.

Photograph by Mike Hume. Extant “Oklahoma” drops on the wall.

Drops from a touring production of “Oklahoma” now decorate one wall.

Biglad, Grit, Rick, Wendy and Mike at Drury Lane.

We returned to the theater on September 11 for a front-of-house tour. Mark Fox showed us the rest of the building.  We couldn’t have had a better tour guide. Fox is an amazing theatre historian, archivist and advertising manager for LW Theatres. Fox even wrote the book Theatre Royal Drury.

Wendy Waszut-Barrett. Mark Fox, Rick Boychuk and Mike Hume.

The Auditorium.

The Royal Box.

View from the Royal Box.

View from the balcony.

The tour wonderful! Mark’s passion about the building is evident, and he is full of fascinating information about the theater’s history, renovations, and decor.

Print of the auditorium.

Print of the rotunda and principle staircases.

The rotunda.

Looking across the rotunda.

Section of a main staircases.

Main staircase.

View from the exterior balcony.

View of the same balcony from the street.

Here are a few more pictures of highlights from our visit.

One of my favorite paintings – Fortunes by G. D. Leslie, RA. It was for the Royal Jubilee, 1887 Exposition. It is now on display in room behind the Royal Box.

Painted detail.

Painted detail.

Painted detail.

The second painting in the same room of June (actress, singer, dancer) by Herbert Draper.

Painted detail.

Painted detail.

Painted detail.

Painting by Seymour Lucas, Study of a New Act Curtain, 1911.

Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. Employee No. 106: C. M. Crouse

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

C.  M. Crouse was listed as a Sosman & Landis employee in 1885. His name was included in a list of individuals who made donations to the Grant Memorial Fund. On August 2, 1885, the Chicago Tribune listed Crouse’s donation as $1.

In 1885, 48-yrs.-old Cyrus M. Crouse and his brother, 53 -yrs. old William F. Crouse, were well-known and well-respected stage carpenters. Both had been working as carpenters and master mechanics since the late-1850s, with decades of experience behind them as experts in stage machinery.

Their parents were John Crouse and Catharine Ziegler. Cyrus and William were two of nine children born to the couple; with only six children surviving infancy.

In 1850, the Crouse family home was in East Brandywine, Chester County, Pennsylvania. This is about 40 miles west of Philadelphia. Census reports that year listed the following individuals are part of the Crouse household: John (45 yrs.), Catharine Crouse (42 yrs.), William (18 yrs.) Amos (15 yrs.), Cyrus (13 yrs.), Mathilda (9 yrs.), Emma (7 yrs.), Charles (5 yrs.), Mary Ann Yoder (17). and Benjamin Harris (48). I am uncertain as to whether Yoder and Harris were extended family members or boarders.

The Crouse family moved to Carroll County, Illinois, in 1856. At the time Cyrus was 19 yrs. old. For geographical context, Mount Carroll is about ten miles east of the Mississippi River (a two-an-a-half hour drive from Chicago). This was part of a larger relocation plan for not only John Crouse, but also his older Daniel Crouse. Both are included in the History of Carroll County, Illinois (1878, page 405). Here are their listing in the section entitled “Portraits of Early Settler and Prominent Men” –

CROUSE, JOHN, Farmer; Sec. 27; P.O. Mt. Carroll; born in Chester Co, Pa., Nov. 24, 1805; was a tanner by trade’ kept hotel and public house 24 years; lived in Philadelphia and 50 years in the State of Pa; came to Carroll Co. in 1856, engaged in farming; owns a farm of 55 acres; married Catherine Ziegler, from Lancaster Co. Pa., in Feb 1828; they have six children: Amos L., William, Cyrus, Charles J., Mathilda G., and Emma; they have lost three children.

CROUSE, DANIEL, Farmer; Sec. 17; P. O. Savanna; born in Chester Co., Pa., July 17, 1803; lived in that state 53 years; was tanner and currier by trade for 20 years; came to Carroll Co., in 1856, and is engaged in farming and stock raising; owns 636 acres of land; has held the office of School Director; married Mary Maurer, from Chester Co., Pa., in March, 1830; they have eight children: Elizabeth, Henry M., Davis F., Jacob H., Hanna M., John, Daniel W., and Mary A.

Daniel Crouse’s land in Carroll County, Illinois, 1869. Daniel was Cyrus’ uncle.

It is important to understand that John and Daniel were “orphaned” in 1819 when their father passed away. Their legal status as “orphan” did not indicate that they had lost BOTH of their parents. The family had to go through orphan court to identify a new male guardian, or guardians, as their mother could not legally fill that role. This was an eye-opening moment for me, as I was reminded that women were not legally allowed to handle any financial or family matters, especially after the loss of a spouse if a large estate was involved. In 1819, the Chester County Orphan Court appointed three guardians to manage the estate and care for the Crouse children. There was one guardian appointed for all the boys, and two separate guardians for the girls.

Lets put this in historical context. The age at which a minor could request naming their own guardian was 14 yrs. old. Keep in mind that the age of consent was much younger than that for all of the nineteenth century. In 1880, 37 states set the age of consent at 10 years old, with only 12 states setting the age of consent at 12 years old. In some states this actually signified progress as in 1871 Delaware lowered the age of consent to 7 yrs. old.

The Crouse brothers’ move west in 1856 must have been a breath of fresh air, especially since John and Daniel had worked in a tannery for decades. The 1860 US Federal census listed the following John Crouse household members in Carroll County, Illinois, including: John (54, farmer), Catharine (51) Amos (25, blacksmith), Mathilda (20, dressmaker), Emma (17, milliner), Charles (16), and Eugene Cogley. Eugene was an infant, only 4 years old. The census listed that he had been born in Illinois, but I am unable to unable to determine if he was related, or an adopted orphan. Interestingly, John and Catherine Crouse would take in another child during the 1860s. The 1870 census listed that they were caring for their 8-yrs.-old nephew, Charles Crouse; not to be confused with their son Charles who was born in 1845.

Mount Carroll offered many possibilities for the Crouse family, especially for their two eldest sons. By 1860, both Cyrus and William had moved south and were living in St. Louis, Missouri.

By 1860, William had already married and celebrated the birth of two children. He and Cyrus were listed as carpenters in the US Federal Census. That year, the extended Crouse household in St. Louis included Cyrus, William F., William’s wife Charlotte, and Williams’ children Mary C. and William P. Crouse.  At some point during the early to mid-1860s, Cyrus and William relocated to Chicago. Their move may have been prompted by the onset of the Civil War or employment opportunities.

Only a few years after moving to Chicago, Williams wife and children died. His son, William, was the first to die on April 11, 1864. His daughter, Mary C., died the next day on April 12.  His wife followed less than a week later. Charlotte A. Crouse died on April 18, 1864. The Cook County Death Index listed the dates as April 12, 13, and 19. The close proximity of the dates, suggests illness swept through the family. All three were buried at Graceland Cemetery (Section G. Lot 951, graves 1, 2, and 3). The fourth grave in the same family plot is occupied by Henry P. Crouse, who died on Sept. 11, 1964. It is possibly that he was the third child of William and Charlotte.

Other family members include Blaney J. Crouse, occupying the fifth grave; he passed away on July 17, 1875.

William F. Crouse eventually joined his family and was laid to rest in grave 8 after his passing on Oct. 7, 1906.

The first mention that I have located of Cyrus in Chicago is from the fall of 1864. On Nov. 28, 1864, Cyrus M. Crouse was listed in the Chicago Tribune in the unclaimed letter section (page 3). It remains unclear as to exactly when Cyrus settled in Chicago and began working as a stage carpenter. He may also have been on the road, outfitting theaters throughout the region staying with his brother whenever he passed through town.

William, however, continued to live and work in Chicago. On Oct. 11, 1866, William F. Crouse and Catherine “Kittie” Doulin. The couple was listed in the Marriage section of the Chicago Tribune. A few years later they celebrated the birth of twin boys, William C. and Howard. A third son, Frank, arrived in 1870. All the while, William continued to work as a stage carpenter, becoming extremely well-known and well-respected by the theatre community for his knowledge of stage machinery.  

C. M. Crouse followed his brother’s lead in the windy city and soon garnered a reputation as a master stage carpenter and mechanic. The second mention that I have located about Cyrsu in Chicago newspapers is from 1865. He was mentioned in a newspaper article, following year after fire broke out at a business block in Chicago. On Dec. 15, 1865, the Chicago Tribune mentioned that C. M. Crouse occupied room No. 18 fourth floor and sustained $50 worth of damage from the fire (page 4). Then he disappears from print again until 1869.

Both Cyrus and his brother were listed in the 1869 Chicago Directory:

Crouse, William F., stage carpenter, r. 147 Townsend

Crouse, Cyrus, carpenter, r. 112 Chicago ave.

Cyrus may have married around this time too. By 1870, Cyrus was living in the 20th Ward of Chicago. The US Federal Census that year listed Cyrus (34, stage carpenter) living with Hattie Crouse (27, keeps house). Although it appear he was married, I have yet to locate any records that confirm their relationship. Therefore, I cannot be certain that she was actually his wife. Hattie Crouse also seems to disappear shortly after the census was taken in 1870. Interestingly, Cyrus and Hattie Crouse were also living with another family in 1870 – the Wilkinsons. The Wilkinson family included Tom (33, Traveling Agent), Agnes (28, keeps house), Thomas (8, at school) and Harry (6).  

It was around this same time that Cyrus became associated with Aiken’s Museum. Sometime between 1870 and 1873, Cyrus M. Crouse, stage carpenter, became known as C. M. Crouse, master mechanic.

Aikens Museum. From Chicagology.

Previously known as Wood’s Museum, after the infamous Col. Wood, the entertainment venue was managed by Frank E. Aiken from approximately 1867-1871. The museum featured natural history objects, paintings, panoramas, and performances in a lecture hall. The hall was actually a full-functional theatre; both Wood and Aiken had recognized the popularity of stage performances. Here is a link to learn more about the history of the venue: https://chicagology.com/prefire/prefire057/

On April 14, 1870, the Chicago Tribune published an advertisement for and event at Aiken’s Museum, announcing, “Friday evening. Benefit of C. M. Crouse” (page 4). Located at the rear of the museum, the performance hall was home to a stock theatre company, where Crouse was likely employed.

On Feb 22, 1871, the Chicago Tribune linked Crouse to Aiken’s Museum again:

COMPLIMENTARY BENEFIT.

The following correspondence explains itself; Mr. Frank E. Aiken:

DEAR SIR: We, the undersigned, the Chicago Press, the members of your company, friends, and admirers, appreciating your merits, not only as manager and an artist, but a gentleman, would kindly ask you to accept a complimentary benefit, to take place on. Wednesday afternoon and evening, March 1. Wishing you every success in the future. We remain yours Truly.”

The letter was signed by sixty-seven people, including C. M. Crouse, Charles Crouse, and Charles’ roomate Fred Bowman. 

Aiken’s reply was also published:

To the Chicago Press, the Public, and my Brother and Sister Artists: I wish to tender my sincere thanks to the ladies and gentlemen whose names are signed to the above communications, this day received by me. I accept the proposed testimonial, not because I think I deserve it, or have any claim upon you, but as a mark of affection, which I shall ever cherish from my Chicago friends and the members of my company. With the hope that our intercourse may be as pleasant in the future as it has been in the past, I subscribe myself your obedient servant – Frank E. Aiken.”

Crouse was still associated with Fred Aiken in 1873, now at his new theatre. On June 15, 1873, the Chicago Tribune advertised “Enormous Attractions for the Summer Season!” with “magnificent new scenery by Halley and Smith, Mechanical novelties by our master mechanic C. M. Crouse, and assistants” (page 16). 

C. M. Crouse is listed as the master mechanic at Aiken’s Theatre in 1873.

The timing of this is important to note with the context of Sosman & Landis. 1873 is two years before they meet and six years before Sosman & Landis establish a studio in Chicago. This means that when Crouse joins the staff at Sosman & Landis, he is a well-known quantity and an asset to the firm.

On July 19, 1873, The Chicago Evening Mail announced:

 “Aitken’s Theater. A grand complimentary benefit for W. H. Harrison, Charles Crouse, Fred Bowman, and Cyrus Crouse, attaches of Aitken’s Theatre, is announced for next Monday evening. John R. Allen and wife, Harvey Pratt, Fred Woodhull, John Marble, Jennie Morgan, and a host of others, have volunteered for the occasion. The bill will consist of a light comedy and farce programme, with Billy Rice in a stump speech and Harry Hart in a recitation of ‘Shamus O’Brien.’ Ben Owens acts as conductor. The attendance will undoubtedly be large.”

On July 20, 1873, The Chicago Tribune reported, “On Monday night a complimentary benefit will be tendered the following-named gentlemen, attached of Aitken’s Theatre: W. H. Harrison, Treasurer, Charles Crouse, Fred Bowman, and Cyrus Crouse, upon which occasion J. R. Allen, Harry Pratt, Fred Woodhull, W. H. Otis, Mrs. J. R. Allen, Miss M. Vickers, Miss Kate Morriss, the Misses Grace and Ada Perkluc, and many others have volunteered to play. Besides, there will be the great Billy Rice and Harry Hart. The bill comprises a great variety of entertainment, and will, without doubt, net for the beneficiaries a very acceptable sun” (page 4).

Throughout the 1870s, Crouse’s reputation continued to grow. He worked at a variety of theaters throughout the region, venturing west to Iowa with several Chicago colleagues. On Nov. 27, 1881, the Burlington Hawk Eye of Burlington, Iowa, reported, “Cyrus M. Crouse, of the Academy of Music, Chicago, is in our city. Mr. Crouse has been for some years connected with that institution as stage carpenter and has earned a reputation for worksmanship unexcelled by any member of his craft” (page 4). By now, Crouse is 55 years old and well-versed in stage machinery. It would have been foolish if Sosman & Landis had not actively gone after Crouse to get home on their staff. We do know that by 1885, Crouse was working for Sosman & Landis. He may have been working part-time at the firm since 1879 when they leased their first shop space in Chicago.

On Jan. 7, 1882, the Chicago Tribune published an extensive article about the Burlington Opera House project, mentioning The building, which has a completeness of construction seldom reached by contractors, deserves a special notice, particularly as the contractors are all well-known Chicago men who make this class of building a specialty. The architect Col. S. V. Shipman, and the woodwork, which in construction of this kind is by far the most important item, was under the immediate charge of Mr. M. B. Bushnell, who in connection with the building of the Academy of Music and Haverly’s Theatre of Chicago, is already widely known…Further inquiry reveals the fact that the stage – a work usually set aside as calling for a special construction – was also built by Mr. Bushnell, and has all the necessary traps and other accessories necessary to a complete theatre. In every particular throughout the entire structure, we find that Mr. Bushness, assisted by able foremen, Messrs. James, Evans, and Crouse, and a gang of skilled workman, has been eminently successful” (page 5).

On Jan. 8, 1882, the Burlington Daily Hawkeye Gazette reported, “C. M. Crouse, of Chicago, superintended the stage carpenter work. That has been his life-long business, and what Mr. Crouse does not know about stage paraphernalia is not worth much trouble to find out. He was brought here from the Chicago Academy of Music to superintend the stage construction, and it is the general verdict that he has made an entire success. The stage appliances are as near to automatic as possible” (page 2).  The same article also noted, “It is claimed by theater men that the Burlington Opera House is the most elegantly frescoed building in the northwest. The style is Moorish or Arabic and the work in detail and, as a whole, is artistic and worthy of the admiration so generally bestowed upon it by all who have seen it. Frank D. Skiff, of Chicago, is the scenic artist. He is from the Academy of Music, and his long experience enabled him to produce work that gives satisfaction and has achieved it with rapidity that is marvelous. He not only fulfilled his contract, but as a matter of fact, he has done more that he agreed to do. The opera house company will hold him in grateful remembrance. The drop curtain, which is truly “a thing of beauty,” was painted by L. L. Graham of Chicago, who ranks alongside the best artists in this line in the United States. The curtain is the topic of general conversation among the audiences and the subject of enthusiastic praise.”

And this is where several lives and careers intersect. L. L. Graham and Thomas G. Moses painted scenery at the Academy of Music in 1881; this is while Moses was working for Sosman & Landis.  Moses’ sister Illie also worked as an actress at the Academy of Music during this same time.  In 1882, Moses leaves Sosman & Landis to partner with L. L. Graham, establishing Sosman & Landis. By 1883, both are working at Sosman & Landis. In 1884, Graham relocates to Kansas City where he established his own studio and operated a branch office for Sosman & Landis. Also, in the spring of 1884 the Chicago Theatrical Mechanics Association was organized by John Barstow, John E. Williams and Frank Goss. Many of the Sosman & Landis stage carpenters, as well scenic artists, belonged to the organization.

Now read the next newspaper article about the new Burlington Opera House with a new perspective about what is going to happen.

Jan. 17, 1882, Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “The following, from the Fort Madison Plain Dealer, reads more like a Chicago item than an Iowa Item, “Burlington had to draw largely on Chicago for the skill and material necessary in the construction of the new opera house. The  following list looks rather bad for the ‘home talent’ of the ‘metropolis of Iowa;’ The architect was Col. S. V. Shipman, of Chicago; the masonry work was done by George Chambers, of Chicago; the carpentry was let to M. B. Bushness, of Chicago; Fitzgerald & Querk, of Chicago, did the plastering; the cut stone and granite were furnished by Tomlinson & Reed, of Chicago; fresco work was done by P. M. Almini, of Chicago; Frank D. Skiff, of Chicago, painted the scenery except the drop curtain, which was done by L. L. Graham, of Chicago; C. M. Crouse, of Chicago, superintended the stage carpenter work; A. C. Hickey, of Chicago, did the plumbing and gas-fitting; Richardson & Boynton, of Chicago, furnished the heating apparatus; the galvanized iron and tin work was done by Kinsley Bors. & Miller, of Chicago; the roofing was put on by M. W. Powell & Co., of Chicago; the opera chairs came from H. Andrews & Co., of Chicago, the sculpture work was executed by D. Richards, of Chicago; the fancy tile flooring was laid by Henry Dibler, of Chicago; H. L. Berry, of Chicago, put up the iron shutters; E. Baggatt & Co. of Chicago, furnished the gas fixtures, and the silverplated work was done by Baldwin & Co,, of Chicago, Chicago ought to be well pleased with the part she took in Burlington’s Building. She was certainly well paid” (2).

Crouse remains in Chicago where is continues to be listed in the City Directory. Here is his 1885 Chicago Directory listing: “Crouse, Cyrus M. Crouse, carp. House 157 W. Washington.” Crouse continues to travel, keeping the same address for the next few years. During this time, Crouse continues to travel for work. Likely representing Sosman & Landis and leading on site installations and outfitting of stages. On Sept 10, 1886, the Columbus Enquirer Sun announced, the arrival of “C. M. Crouse, Chicago” at the Central Hotel (page 23).

Here are the Chicago directory listings for the next few years:

1887    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. h. 157 W. Washington

1888    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. h. 51 S. Union

1889    Crouse, Cyrus M., machinist. h. 51 S. Union

In 1889, Crouses’ residence, 51 S. Union, was a multi-residence building, home to a variety of businesses and people, including stage carpenter James A. Carana, was also boarding at 51 S. Union. For example, on March 3, 1889, the following want ad was placed in the Trades section of the Chicago Tribune (page 23):

“SITUATION WANTED – By practical engineer with best references, Chas. Jorgenson, 51 S. Union.”

In the late-1880s, there were dozens of stage carpenters working in Chicago, with many listed in the City Directory simply by the trade “carp”, for carpenter. Of these men, only a few were mentioned newspaper articles.  This was a period of change in the industry, as allegiances formed, and groups worked toward a common goal. However, not everyone held the same common vision. While some worked toward a mutual aid association, others pushed for a labor society. Crouse was in the middle of this debate, a battle that made headlines in Chicago. On May 13, 1888, the Chicago Tribune published an article entitled “In Pursuit of a Corpse.”  Theatrical charities were discussed, with emphasis on Chicago’s Theatrical Mechanics Association.

John Bairstow, stage carpenter at the Grand Opera and McVicker’s, was also featured in the article:

“Chicago has also a Theatrical Mechanics’ Association, which takes in all the hands about a theatre except the actors and managers. Many persons are employed in the purely mechanical department of the theatre. At McVicker’s 120 persons were behind the curtain when Irving played, their duty being to look after scenery, lights, traps, ‘drops,’ properties, etc. It required sixty to look after ‘A Run of Luck,’ and forty is the average number of men employed. Mr. John Bairstow, master carpenter at McVicker’s, has been the head of the Theatrical Mechanics’ Association since it was started, but recently has been pushed out by radical members, who wish to make the society a labor instead of a mutual aid association. The men work only a couple hours a night, and they want $9 a week instead of $6. This exorbitant demand is likely to be firmly resisted by the capitalist managers. The theatrical mechanics will likely find that they have destroyed a worthy charity in forming a worthless labor machine” (page 25).

Although Crouse continued to work as a stage carpenter in the 1890s, his name no longer makes news. I have only been able to trace him to a handful of Chicago Directories. Here are his listings in the 1890s:

1890    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. 116 S. Halsted

1891    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. 116 S. Halsted

1896    Crouse Cyrus M., Cyrus M., carp. 118 S. Halsted

1897    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. h. 51 S. Union (same home address as he listed in 1888 – 1889)

1898    Crouse, Cyrus M., carp. h. 51 S. Union

Crouse passed away on Sept. 9, 1899, in Chicago. He was 62 years old and listed as a stage carpenter. Like many of his Sosman & Landis colleagues, Crouse was buried at Forest Home Cemetery, Forest Park, Illinois. Forest Home Cemetery is located at 863 S. Des Plaines, Ave. in Forest Park.  His name was published in the Official Death Record section of the Chicago Tribue on Sept. 12, 1899 (page 5). The listing for Burial Permits issued by the Health Department included, “Crouse, Cyrus M., 62; 188 S. Halsted-st., Sept, 9.”

Sadly, I cannot even include a picture of Crouses’ gravestone as cemetery records do not indicate where he was actually laid to rest in 1899.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar:  J. U. Tschudi and the Kimmswick Historical Society, March 18, 2023

Copyright © 2023 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

In January, I was contacted by Diane Nagy, President of the Kimmswick Historical Society. For geographical context, Kimmswick, Missouri, is a very small river town about 26 miles south of St. Louis. The Kimmswick Historical Society had recently acquired a large painting by J. U. Tschudi. Dated 1914, the artist titled the painting, “Early Days on the Mississippi River.” While searching for information about the artist, Nagy stumbled across my post about Tschudi at www.drypigment.net. Tschudi represented the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887. This firm was affiliated with the Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio in Chicago. The two firms shared projects and artists over the decades, remaining affiliates until the 1920s.

My trip to St. Louis for the United States Institute of Theatre Technology conference this month provided me with an opportunity to examine the Tschudi painting and meet Kimmswick Historical Society members. On March 18, I journeyed south, accompanied by my close friend and colleague, Jenny Knott. Diane Nagy and Nadine Garland provided shuttle service and conversation for the day. We spent most of the afternoon chatting about historical artifacts and the intriguing history of Kimmswick.

Our first stop was to see the oil painting, currently stored at the studio of Irek T. Szelag. Szelag is a Polish immigrant nearing retirement. In fact, this will be his last commission. We were joined at Szelag’s studio by a few other Historical Society members; they were curious to about hear about my knowledge of Tschudi and his work. The decision to preserve Tschudi’s work was hotly contested by half of the ten-member Kimmswick Historical Society Board of Directors, necessitating a tie-breaking vote by the president. Not everyone was keen to spend a large amount of money on this heavily damaged painting.

Painting by J. U. Tschudi at Szelag’s studio on March 18, 2023.

The Kimmswick Historical Society is a small non-profit organization that does not accept State or Federal aid. Their operating budget is obtained through donations and the sale of apple butter. The funding of every Historical Society project is translated into the sale of “jars” and “cars.”  “Jars” refers to the sale of apple butter and “cars” refers to the sale of parking spots when thousands of people descend upon this small town of 146 residents for the Apple Butter Festival https://gokimmswick.com/apple-butter-festival-kimmswick/ . Each year, the Historical Society sells approximately 6000 jars of apple butter. Of this amount, 500 jars are still made on site, using a massive copper kettle over an open fire. By the way, each jar of apple butter sells for $6; a fabulous deal, considering the extensive amount of time is takes to prep, cook and can the apples.

The Kimmswick Historical Society stand at the Apple Butter Festival.
Apple butter pot on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.

Back to Tschudi’s artwork…

When I initially examined pictures of Tschudi’s painting, I was struck by his inclusion of a title and painted surround. It looked more like circus banner than an oil painting intended for a residential wall.  In fact, it reminded me of early twentieth-century state displays at world fairs or other industrial expositions. Upon close inspection, I notice that the edges of the canvas had been hemmed, like early marketing banners that were intended to advertise a public entertainment. I am positive that this artwork was created to be tacked onto a wall, the side of a building, or fence; advertising some public event or spectacle.

Hemmed edge of the Tschudi painting.
Title and painted frame of the Tschudi painting.

After leaving Szelag’s studio, we spent the remainder of the afternoon touring the Kimmswick Historical Society and enjoying a fabulous lunch at the oldest building in town. Designated, “The Old House” this structure was originally built in 1770. The reason for selecting tis particular eating establishment was that Tschudi’s painting once hung in a front room, near a fire place; a fireplace that never vented properly, hence the discoloration of the painting over time. 

Wall where the Tschudi painting was once located in the Old House.
Sketch of the Old House in Kimmswick, currently on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.

In addition to lunch, our hosts gifted us Kimmswick Historical Society cookbooks upon our departure. It is one of the more interesting compilations of Midwest and Southern recipes that I have come across in recent year. Yes, the apple butter recipe is included too! Overall, I had a delightful time learning about Kimmswick and its history.

The Kimmswick Historical Society Cookbook includes the recipe for their apple butter.

While sitting in the St. Louis airport on March 19, I began to re-examine the life and career of J. U. Tschudi, searching for possible clues that might lead to the origin of his painting.  This quest continued upon my return home. I arrived sick and began a week-long quarantine in the basement, desperately trying to keep my germs to myself. My son’s High School Orchestra  was spending the first part of Spring Break in New York City. I really didn’t want him to catch this bug.  Fortunately, my self-imposed quarantine provided me with an opportunity to re-examine Tschudi’s life and career. My previous post about Tschudi from 2020 was quite brief, intended as only a side story to my history about the Kansas City Scenic Company. Tschudi was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co., working alongside B. F. Dunn and C. A. Oldham.

Here is my expanded tale about this fascinating artist and painting.

Like many nineteenth-century American immigrants, the story of Tschudi begins in Europe and ends in the Midwest. His tale could be called “From Switzerland to St. Louis,” was he passed away at 728 South Second Street, only a short walk from the Convention Center that hosted USITT. Both Tschudi and his son worked as scenic artists for the Kansas City Scenic Art Co. during the early Twentieth Century. Combined, they are responsible for hundreds of stage settings delivered throughout the United States between 1880 and 1940.

John Ulrich Tschudi was born on March 22, 1850, in Switzerland. Named after his father, he was the son of Johann Ulrich Tschudy (1822-1886) and Anna Margaretha Egli (1821-). In 1856, the Tschudi family emigrated to the United States with his family. They departed a ship named the Ocean Steed on March 22, 1856 – Tschudy’s 6th birthday. Passengers included John Ulrich Tschudy (34 yrs.), wife Ann Mary (35 yrs.), and children Cath (10 yrs.), Valentin (8 yrs.), Margaretha (7 yrs.), John M. (6 yrs.), Walter (4 yrs.), Tobias (11 mths.). Ann Mary’s father, W. Egli (59 yrs.) also sailed on the same ship. They arrived in the US on July 30, 1856, and soon settled in Burlington, Iowa. Two other Tschudy children were born after moving to Iowa- Minnie (b. 1856) and Lily (b. 1859).

I am going to take a moment to discuss historical records and reported names for John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr.  First of all, the family used both Tschudy and Tschudi as their surname in city directories, public records, and newspaper articles. This shift primarily occurred in the 1870s. For the purpose of this post, I will use both.

Secondly, the “U” for Ulrich was often misrepresented as an M, W, A, or even H. This is understandable when you begin to examine how a handwritten cursive capital U can look like other letters, especially in passenger lists and census reports.

To further muddy the waters, there was another Swiss emigrant named John Ulrich Tschudi/Tschudy (1828-1901) who settled in Minnesota. He is a completely different individual who has greatly confused many family genealogists.  Minnesota Tschudi lived his life as a farmer, while the main characters of my story – John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. (1822-1886) and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr. (1850-1921) – who worked as a German Presbyterian Church pastor and scenic artist, respectively.  With this little bit of information, here is the tale of scenic artist J. U. Tschudi.

In later years, Tschudi Jr. recounted that the Tschudi family only stayed in Burlington for two years before relocating to Memphis, Tennessee, where “he learned his business under the tutelage of his father, who was also an artist.” I can neither confirm nor disprove this statement, as evaded public record until the onset of the Civil War.

By 1861, Tschudi Sr. enlisted in the Union Army. Tschudi Sr. is listed in the “US Adjutant General Military Records, 1631-1976,” available at ancestry.com. The 1864-1864 report lists “John Ulrich Tschudy” of Burlington, Iowa, as a Private in Co. G. of the 57th Illinois Infantry. At the age of 38, he entered into military service on August 26, 1861. Co. G. rendezvoused in Chicago and was quartered at Camp Douglas. Tschudi Jr. was too young to enlist; the official enlistment age was 18 yrs. old. Again, to make things even more confusing, Minnesota Tschudi also fought in the Civil War (Minnesota Infantry, 2nd Regiment).

By 1867, the Tschudy family was living in Dubuque, Iowa. Between 1867 and 1869, Tschudi Sr. is listed as a student at the German Seminary. After completing his studies in Dubuque, In 1867, Tschudi Jr. is listed as a student.  It is in Dubuque that Tschudi Jr. meets his future wife, Marguerite Merkes (1850-1931). Merkes is exactly the same age as, Tschudi Jr., was born on March 23, 1850, in Diekirch Luxembourg. Merkes was the daughter of Jean Pierre Merckes/John Peter Merkes (1811-1861) and Clara L. Abend/Abendt (1817-1895). The Merkes family emigrated from Luxembourg to Dubuque, Iowa in 1859, with John Peter Merkes passing in 1864. His widow, Clara Abendt Merkes, remarried in 1864. Her second husband was Michael Fohrman (1811-1894), also an emigrant from Luxembourg.

In 1867, Clara’s 17-yrs. old daughter, Marguerite Merkes, becomes pregnant. As an unwed mother, Marguerite is removed to Chicago where she waits for the impending arrival of her first born. On August 1, 1868, Marguerite gives birth to a son whom she names John, after the baby’s father John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr. It is important to note that the actual birth year of baby John’s birthdate vacillates over the years, ranging from 1867-1869.

Two things happen at this point; decisions that were very characteristic when a child was born out of wedlock. First, the baby is born, but then raised by a grandparent. In this case, baby John returned to Dubuque where he was raised by his maternal grandmother, Clara Abendt Merkes Forman, and his, maternal step-grandfather, Michael Fohrman. John Merkes name instantly becomes John J. Fohrman, and he is clearly listed as the son of Michael and Clara Fohrman. It is only in Michael Fohrman’s will that John J. Fohrman is listed as an “adopted son.” Despite the eventual marriage of John’s parents, Marguerite Merkes and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr., their son is never returned to their care.

In the meantime, Tschudi Sr. completes his training at the Germany Seminary in Dubuque and answers his first call in Platteville, Wisconsin (1870),where he relocates with his wife and four daughters (Margaretha, Lucy, Minnie, and Lillie). Tschudi Jr. and Marguerite remain in Iowa. In 1869, Tschudi Jr.’s occupation was listed as “cigar maker” in the Dubuque Directory; this was when he was living with his father at “Couler av bet Nineteenth and Twentieth.”

By 1872, Tschudi Sr, answers a call to ministry in Memphis, Tennessee. During this entire time, Rev. J. U. Tschudi is associated with the German Presbyterian Church.  He is repeatedly listed in the newspapers. During this period, Memphis struggles with yellow fever, losing thousands of its citizens to five major outbreaks. On Oct 15, 1873, “The Central Presbyterian” of Richmond, VA, reported, “Another Bereavement – Rev. J. A. Tschudy, pastor of the German Presbyterian church in Memphis, lost his son, Walter, Oct. 6th, in his 23rd year of his age, of yellow fever” (page 2). This was part of the fourth Yellow fever epidemic in Memphis, where 2500 people passed away between Aug and Oct of that year. At the time it constituted the largest yellow fever outbreak in any inland city. A few months later, the Tschudi family is able to celebrate the marriage of Margaretha Tschudi to minister, Henry A. Grentzenberg. I have yet to locate any mention of Tschudi J. in Memphis during this time. Rev. J. U. Tschudi is last mentioned in Memphis newspapers during 1878. At the time, he was associated with the First German Presbyterian Church, located on the corner of Venice and DeSoto streets. I have yet to uncover any information that links Tschudi Jr. to Memphis. Although he likely traveled throughout the country painting scenery, he married and celebrated the birth of two children in Iowa between 1871 and 1875.

In later years, Tschudi Jr. suggested an alternative story, explaining that from 1868 to 1873 he studied art in Europe. This is highly suspect, especially since he married Marguerite Merkes in Dubuque, Iowa in October 1871 and began raising a family in Iowa by 1873. Daughter Lucy was born in the spring of 1873, with her younger sister, Minnie Lillian, arriving in the spring of 1875. Later newspaper articles about Tschudi Jr. purported, “After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ’I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad.” I have yet to locate any information that suggests his father ever worked as an artist, but you never know.

Here is what I have tracked down about Tschudi Jr.’s scenic art career; a tale compiled from city directories, historical records, and newspaper headlines.

By the late 1870s, Tschudi begins working with Cincinnati fresco artist, William Theodore Blomberg (1829-1909).  Tschudi Jr. has several relations in Cincinnati, including his older sister Margaretha (Margaretha Tschudy Grentzenberg). In 1880, Tschudi and Blomberg head to Kansas, where they work as itinerant artists throughout the region that year. Blomberg returns to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi remaining in Kansas.

The first line of Tschudi’s biographical listing entry in “Cutler’s History of Kansas” is “JOHN U. TSCHUDI, fresco and scenic artist, came to Kansas in July 1880.”  He arrived a bit earlier than that as Tschudi is mentioned in a Kansas newspaper advertisement that June. On June 16, 1880, the “Augusta Republican” of Augusta, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, painters and frescoers are on hand according to promise and ready to do any kind of fancy work in their line at reasonable rates. Call and leave your orders” (page 3).

Tschudi initially settled in Wichita, before relocating to Emporia. His initial tie to Wichita was to the newly constructed opera house; he and Blomberg were credited with the scenery, as well as their ties to Cincinnati. They were mentioned in letter published in the “McPherson Republican” on August 12, 1880:

“Elk Falls Letter.

Elk Falls, August 9th, 1880.

Editors Republican:- Since leaving McPherson two weeks ago we have taken in the counties of Marion, Butler, Sedgewick, Cowley, Sumner, and now we are now in Elk. From Florence we ran down the Eldorado Branch to Eldorado, the county seat of Butler, and from thence to Augusta by stage. In this town, situated on the St. Louis & San Fransico line to Wichita, we were somewhat surprised to find a regular opera hall, and our surprise was somewhat increased in visiting the hall, to find everything first class. In the construction of the stage, etc., Mr. Israel Zimmerman, the stage carpenter proved himself to be a master of his profession. Messrs. Tschudi & Blomburg, the scenic artists, whose headquarters are at Cincinnati, Ohio, were completing the advertising drop curtain when we were there. They will have one forest scene, six wings, one street scene, one rustic kitchen scene, four wings; one garden and landscape scene, two wings; one prison scene, four wings, and one scenic drop curtain. The stage is arched and the arch is frescoed. The work when done will give them an opera hall to be envied by many towns double their population…” (page 2).

On October 16, 1880, the “Cowley County Monitor” of Winfield, Kansas, reported, Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the fresco artists, are at work on M. L. Robinson’s residence. They also have engagements with J. C. Fuller and M. L. Read. Our citizens who want fresco work cannot do better than secure these gentlemen” (page 3).

On Nov. 25, “The Sumner County Press” of Wellington, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the artists who did scene painting and fresco work for the opera hall here, also did some fresco paintings on the dwellings of M. L. Reed, S. H. Myton and M. L. Robinson. They have now gone to Wellington to fresco the hall of the PRESS building. On their return they will commence work on Mr. Fulton’s fine dwelling. If the Presbyterians and the Methodists would have their churches frescoed in first class style it would be worth bragging about. Tschudi and Blomberg have done the best work in the State.- Winfield Monitor”(page 3).

Despite their success, Blimberg returned to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi settling in Wichita. It remains unclear as to when Tschudi’s family joined him in Kansas. However, in 1881, Tschudi was living in Wichita. On Oct. 31, 1881, “The Daily Leader” of Wichita reported, “John W. Tschudy, the artist of Wichita, went to Emporia yesterday to paint the scenery in the new Opera House in that town” (page 4). A month later, his ties to Cincinnati were mentioned in an Emporia newspaper. On Nov. 29, 1881, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley Opera House” (page 4).

Tschudi soon partnered with stage carpenter, J. W. Morris, to deliver scenery and stage machinery to the Whitley Opera House. On Dec. 1, 1881, “The Emporia Ledger” reported “Messrs. John W. Tschudi, scenic painter, and J. W. Morris, stage carpenter, the gentlemen who have the contract to furnish and fit the scenery and stage trappings of the Whitley Opera House, commenced work yesterday. They will put in a complete set of scenes and all the latest improvements in stage equipment. They say they find everything about the house in excellent shape for their work, and that they will be able to compete their contract in six or seven weeks. Their work will be so well advanced by the first of January that the house may be used at that time, of desired” (page 3). That same day, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley opera house” (page 3). Tschudi was repeatedly mentioned in Emporia newspapers.

Tschudi continued to work in Emporia. On Jan. 26, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported that Tschudi was painting scenery for Ed White’s touring production of ‘Fantanitza,’ scheduled to visit Emporia in March, detailing, “He left an order with Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist who has been employed for some weeks past at the Whitely opera house, for some scenery to be used in bringing out the grand illumination tableau in ‘Fantanitza” The article also mentioned Tschudi’s current work at the Whitley reporting, “There is also a water main behind the drop curtain on the stage with sufficient hose attached to reach over the flys. The scenery has been done by that skillful and well-known artist, John Tcheudy of Switzerland, and is a marvel of beauty…The scenery is sized with fireproof sizing and cannot be kindled into a blaze…” Tschudi’s work at the Whitley certainly boosted his career. On Feb 2. 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported “The stage, one of the best in the west, is 30-x60 feet and is furnished with all the accessories of a metropolitan theatre. These include a variety of excellent scenery suitable for the preparation of all classes of drama; complete and secured appliances for shifting lights, and an exquisite drop curtain representing a charming scene on the Rhine, painted by Mr. Tshudi, one of the most talented scenic artists in the country” (page 3).  

The Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, featured scenery by J. U. Tschudi and W. T. Blomberg.
An interior view of the Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, c, 1898.

Tschudi’s success in Emporia soon prompted him to relocate there from Wichita. Initially, he set up a studio at the Whitley Opera House. On March 22 and 23, 1882, “The Evening News” in Emporia announced, “You will find John W. Tschudi at the Whitley opera house ready to do all kinds of house painting, kalsomining, frescoe decorating, plain and fancy sign writing, etc. First-class work at reasonable rates, guaranteed” (page 4). He continued to place one advertisement after another in local papers, securing a variety of local projects that ranged from private residences to commercial signs. On April 8, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Two of the handsomest signs in town were placed in position this morning at the entrance of Robert Jeff’s tobacco ad cigar emporium on Commercial street. They were painted by Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitley opera house and cannot fail to attract attention” (page 4). On April 20, 1882, The Weekly News-Democrat” reported, “A very handsome altar recently completed by the Roberts Brothers has been placed in the upper room of the Franciscan convent, which is used at present as a place of worship for the congregation. The painting, which is beautiful and highly artistic, was done by John Tschudi, scenic artist at the Whitley opera house.” (page 4).

Tschudi landed so many projects at this time, that it became necessary to hire an assistant. On April 15, 1882, “The Evening News” (page 4) reported, “W. S. Walborn, a sign painter, lately of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, is assisting Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitely Opera House” (page 3). This announcement was also published on April 20, 1882, in “The Emporia Weekly News.” In later years, both Tschudi and Walborn worked as scenic artists as the Kansas City Scenic Co.

Tschudi’s work was drawing other prospective theatre proprietors to Wichita to see his work. . On April 22, 1882, and on April 27, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Friday evening we had a pleasant call from Mr. Samuel Smith and a Mr. A. W. Barker, both of Ottawa, Kansas. These gentlemen were in the city for the purpose of viewing the Whitley Opera house, more particularly the stage appointments and scenery. Last evening the opera house was lighted, and they were shown through it, and expressed themselves as much pleased with the result of their inspection. The new opera house in Ottawa is about completed, and it was with a view to gaining some points as to scenery, etc., that these gentlemen visited Emporia. They were greatly pleased with the Whitley opera house stage scenery, and it is not unlikely that Mr. Tschudi, the artist, will secure a contract of the same at Ottawa” (page 3).

All the while, Tschudi continued to run a series of advertisements in local newspapers. Here are a few of note:

 On July 27, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” announced, “John Tschudi, the Whitley opera house scenic artist, sent a number of ornamental signs to Colorado yesterday.”

On July 29, 1882, Tschudi’s advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” stated, “Signs! Signs! —In Japanese, East Lake, Queen Anne, and Oriental styles by Tschudi, the artist. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store.”

By summer, Tschudi had customers placing orders at Moore’s Drug Store. An advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” on July 29, 1882, announced “Let the work speak for itself,” is my motto, Tschudi, Artist, Fresco Decorator, Ornamental Painter, and Sign Writer. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” and “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” (page 4). Tschudi’s ads ran continuously until October 1882.

On Aug. 15, 1882, and the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (page 4).

His association with Moore’s drug store, meant that Tschudi needed someone to take orders, while he traveled for work. This ensured a constant stream of income when he returned from out-of-town projects. On Oct 18, 1882, “The Evening News” reported, “John Tschudi, the scenic artist, returned to-day from Wellington, where he has been painting the scenery for the new opera house at that place” (page 1). Despite his absences, Tschudi would advertise, “Remember that Tschudi, the artist, is still here, and will do you the highest and latest artistic style, and at bottom figures. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (Emporia Daily News, Oct 18, 1882, page 4). On Dec 21, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Tschudi has made a large transparent street sign which will be placed in position soon and bear the letters ‘Ice cream and oysters.’ The same artist prepared the beautiful parlor screen upon whose surface are painted six different attractive designs in oil” (page 3).

By 1883, Tschudi was included in the Emporia Directory. Interestingly, his listing suggests pervious work in Tennessee, and not Wichita or Cincinnati: “Tschudi, John U., fr Tenn., ornamental frescoe scenic painting, and sign writer, shop 197 Commercial st, res same.” His wife was also listed in the directory at the same address. Marguerite began going by Margaret.

Painting projects for 1883 included G. T. Carlton’s Billiard Hall and Fithian’s Ice wagon in Emporia. On Feb 20, 1883, “The Evening News” reported, “Mr. G. T. Carlton to-day opened to the public his handsome new billiard parlor in the Soden building on Fifth Avenue. Tschudi. The artist has been busy for several weeks past frescoing the walls of the room and the result of his skillful hand is seen in the excellent effects he has produced…” (page 4).

On April 19, 1883, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported “A Thing of Beauty. Fithian’s ice wagon made its first trip for the season Thursday, and it attracted as much attention as a circus chariot as it rolled along the street resplendent in brilliant colors and decorations by the brush of Tschudi, the scenic artist. The arctic sketches on the sides are excellent works of art, and it will be refreshing to even look at them when the mercury begins to crawl up into the sky parlor of thermometer” (page 1).

However, he continued to paint stage scenery for a variety of venues throughout the region. On March 22, 1883, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “John Tschudi has received an order to paint a set of scenes for the Amateur Dramatic club of Newton” (page 4).

On May 17, 1883, “The Weekly News-Democrat” reported on the dedication of the Welsh Congregational Church on Merchants Street” (page 1). Of the new auditorium, the article reported that sections of ornamental plaster work were “artistically frescoed by Tschudi, the scenic artist, whose happy combination of complimentary colors and agreeable shades proclaim him an artist of superior merit…”

On October 19, 1883, the “Iola Register” reported, “Mr. J. N. Tschudi has been at work in the opera house all week and has made quite a change there. In addition to the business cards which adorn the front of the stage, Mr. Tschudi has been painting a new and elegant drop curtains which he expects to have ready by Saturday night. He has also made new and larger wings, to correspond with each scene, and before he leaves will paint the woodwork on the front of the stage. He expects to finish his work sometime next week, and the opera house will certainly ne much handsomer for his having been there” (page 5).

On Dec. 1, 1883, “The Humboldt Union” of Humboldt, Kansas, credited Tschudi with delivering scenery to the Germania Hall. The article reported, “The scenery [described in detail] and the arch of the stage is handsomely decorated. The artist, John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, has performed his work in first class style” (page 3).

As in the past, Tschudi was not working alone, nor was he simply hiring local amateurs. A variety of skilled personalities were working for Tschudi in Emporia, including Charles Stebbins. On May 2, 1883, “Emporia Daily News” and “Evening News” reported, “Charles Stebbins, who is employed by Tschudi, the artist and painter, has returned from Hartford, Michigan, where he recently fell heir to a legacy of $1,000” (page 1).

Tschudi began to secure an abundance of scenic work for stages throughout Kansas. On Jan 25, 1884, “The Weekly Kansas” of Independence reported, “Of all the improvements made during the past year in Independence there are none in which so much interest is felt as in the Opera House block erected by Mr. Payne….The stage is large and commodious, it being 24×66 feet, with four dressing rooms, and the footlights are fixed with a lever so they can be shut off or put in place at will. It will be supplied with good scenery. Mr. John Tschudi. The artist, is now here for that purpose. He comes highly recommended as a scenic painter. There will be thirteen sets of scenes and fifteen set scenes” (page 4). While working on a theater project, however, Tschudi would land a variety of other painting projects. Such was the case in Chanute, Kansas. On Aug. 28, 1884, the “Chanute Blade” of Chanute, Kansas reported, “The Chanute Bank is being neatly frescoed by John U. Tschudi, and will be one of the nicest finished rooms in the city when completed” (page 3).

Tschudi’s comings and goings were announced in a variety of small-town newspapers, making it easy to trace his travels. For example, On Oct. 16, 1884, “The Chanute Blade” reported, “John U. Tschudi went to Kansas City last Tuesday, to paint some new scenery and drop curtains at Kansas City. He painted two very beautiful scenes for Williams’ Hall in this city, last week. He will return here in about two weeks to paint the scenes and drop curtain for the new opera house now being erected here” (page 3). Tschudi was also working on the new stage setting for an opera house in Red Cloud, Nebraska. On October 16, 1885, the “Webster County Argus” of Red Cloud reported, “The proprietors of the opera house expect to have the same opened on Monday, the 26th inst. A good dramatic company has been engaged for the occasion. The house will be seated with six hundred chairs. Prof. Tschudi, the scenic artist, with a force of carpenters in making and placing the scenery, which will consist of eight complete settings, besides a handsome drop curtain.”

Sometime between the fall of 1885 and 1886, Tschudi moved to Kansas City, By 1887, he was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. The firm’s offices were located in the Gillis Opera House.

The Gillis Opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.
A photograph of the Gillis opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.

This is where it gets interesting, and a little confusing. Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio outfitted the Gillis, with L. L. Graham and W. P. Davis working as the scenic artists on the project, while representing the firm. Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis opened a branch office in Kansas City in 1884; it was headed by L. L. Graham. At the same time, Graham and Davis also operated a studio, known as Graham & Davis, frequently working as subcontractors for Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis’ work for the Gillis was well-known and mentioned in a variety of newspapers. For example, on April 21, 1887, “The Times” of Clay Center, Kansas, reported that Sosman & Landis had “fitted the Gillis Opera House, Kansas City, and the Grand at Topeka.” Graham’s Studio in Kansas City, the Kansas City Scenic Co. and Sosman & Landis’ scenic studio were not directly competing in the region, they were divvying up work and sharing artists. Even in 1888, Dunn was listed as not only a scenic artist at Graham’s Studio, but also on staff at the Kansas City Scenic Studio. By 1890, an new iteration of the Kansas City Scenic Co. opened, solely under the management of Dunn and J. C. Bronaugh. On July 13, 1891, the Kansas Patron commented that Bronaugh was “the traveling member of the Kansas City Scenic Co.” Bronaugh secured the contracts and Dunn painted the scenery. This new iteration of the firm still maintained a close business alliance with the Sosman & Landis until the 1920s.

In 1887, Kansas City Scenic Co. advertisements list J. U. Tschudi, B. F. Dunn, C. A. Oldham and C. J. Lorella. On March 22, 1887, the “Wichita Star” reported “A reporter was shown the number of samples from scenic-artist work from the brush of Kansas City Scenic-Artist company, in which company figures, as an artist, Mr. J. W. Tschudi, formerly of the city. The work is artistic and ranges throughout the entire term of scenic work. Landscapes, rocky passes, woods, streets, palaces, parlors, chambers, kitchens, hovels – in fact every known term of scenic effects were painted in the highest style of art. The JOURNAL congratulates Mr. Tschudi on the excellent work of the firm in which his brush is prominent” (page 4).

On June 16, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” of Little River, Kansas, reported, “The carpenters’ work on the new opera hall is going on at a lively rate, Canfield & Co. are doing the work in good shape. Messrs. Tschudi, Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job.” On June 18, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” reported, “Messrs. Tschudi Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job. The mammoth drop curtain is a beauty. It is ornamented with the business cards of our merchants and others and will be first class in every particular.” 

On May 20, 1887, “The Lyons Daily Democrat” in Lyons, Kansas, reported, “Mess. Tschudi, Dunn, and Oldham, scenic artists from Kansas City, are preparing a very fine new drop curtain for Tom’s Butler’s Opera House. Tom very properly thinks the public would be pleased to have a brand new curtain to gaze at between acts. The gentlemen represent a firm of scenic artists who are furnishing many of the finest Opera Houses in Kansas with stage settings, and our citizens must admit, when their work is first shown, they understand their business thoroughly and are first-class artists in every respect. They will furnish scenery for the fine new opera house at Wichita, and when Lyon’s new Opera House looms up, they will probably again have an opportunity to display their artistic powers” (page 3).

On October 22, 1887, “The Caldwell News” of Caldwell, Kansas, reported, “Judge J. G. Woods is now moving into his new building this week. The lower story is occupied by the Woods bank, This room is elegantly fitted up in solid walnut. The south room is occupied by C. E. Flaudro’s clothing house. The opera house occupies the second story. It is the same size as the Crawford Opera House at Topeka. The stage is 50 feet wide and 25 feet deep and is furnished with fifteen complete sets of scenery including an elegant drop curtain painted by the artist John U. Tschudi…” (page 1) [reprinted on Oct 12, 1922, p 1].

On Dec. 1, 1887, “The Kingman Courier” reported, “Prof. John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, will have completed the scenic work at Garfield Opera House by the 6th of December. The scenes painted by this talented artist display true genius, combined with the highest-class conceptions of the true and beautiful. When completed the Garfield Opera house will surpass anything of a similar character in Kansas” (page 6).

Tschudi also painted scenery for the Garfield Opera House in Kingman, Kansas. The time he was traveling with a stage mechanic named Mr. Foreman. On Dec. 7, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Tschudi, the scenic artist, and Foreman, the stage builder of the Garfield Opera House, will be given a benefit by the amateurs of Kingman Saturday night. They are worthy gentlemen and the entertainment in their interest should be ell attended” (page 3). On

On Dec. 12, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported “Messrs. Tschudi & Foreman desire to return their sincere thanks to the ladies and gentlemen who so kindly assisted at their benefit on Saturday evening last and thereby insured its success, And they also hope that those who by their presence graced the auditorium enjoyed a peasant evening” (page 3).

Dec. 22, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Prof. John Tschudi, artist at the Garfield Opera House, will pass the holidays with his family at Kansas City” (page 3). This indicates that Tschudi moved his family from Emporia to Kansas City when he became associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887.

By 1888, Tschudi had left the Kansas City Scenic Co. and had established Tschudi, Loffing, & Roberts at 400 East 12th in Kansas City. His new business partners were Albert Roberts and Antoine Loffing. Tschudi’s residential address was listed as R. 1731 Walnut.  

On Feb. 1, 1888, “The Kingman Daily Courier” of Kingman, Kansas, reported, “Prof. Tschudi is, beyond all doubt, the thorough, classical scenic artist in Kansas. His fine conceptions of mountain and sea, of glen and valley, of hill and dell, when spread upon canvass by his deft hand, are gems of beauty on which the eye fondly hangs. The COURIER heartily commends Prof. Tschudi to the managers of the Greensburg Opera House.” (page 5).

The Tschudi’s relocated to Omaha, Nebraska, by 1890. Tschudi is working as the scenic artist at the Eden Musee, living at 1108 Farnam. Interestingly, John S. Tschudi, artist, also listed 1108 Farnam as his address for 1890 and 1891. This may be a double listing, or John S. is actually Tschudi Jr.’s son, John Fohrman; the baby that was born out of wedlock and raised by maternal grandparents, Clara and Michael Fohrman. By 1890, John is over 21 years old. It is very possible that he reunited with his biological father and began working as an artist. The Tschudi Family continued live in Omaha, with Tschudi’s daughters also securing employment.

The 1892 Omaha Directory listed:

Tschudi John S, scenic artist Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th

Tschudi Lucy Miss, folder O Ptg Co, res 612 S 18th

Tschudi Minnie, candy stand Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th

The 1893 Omaha Directory listed:

Tschudi John U, scenic artist, Wonderland, res. 612 S 18th

Tschudi Lucy, clk Candy stand Wonderland, bds 612 S 18th

Miss Minnie, folder Klopp & Bartlett Co., res 612 S 18th

Tschudi’s 1892 connection with Eden Musee also makes Indiana’s newspapers. On Jan 25, 1893, “The Indianapolis News” reported, “No Chance for an Eden Musee. For two weeks past T. U. Tschudi, a scenic artist, who has been in the museum business for some years, and Mme. L. Brouillard have been staying at the Circle Park Hotel. Together they have been looking for a suitable building in which to start Eden Musee in New York. The only building in the city that seemed available was the Speigel & Thomas building on Washington street, but Mr. Tschudi was unable to agree on the amount of security that he should give for the lease, and could not make a satisfactory arrangement with the owner” (page 2).

This particular moment signals a shift for Tschudi Jr. and his family, possibly indicating a temporary separation from his wife. His family returns to Kansas City where Tschudi rejoins them in 1897.

During the mid-1890s, Tschudi Jr. heads east, traveling throughout Indiana and Kentucky.

On Aug. 28, 1895, the “Richmond Item” of Richmond, Indiana, reported, “Beautiful Scenery. The Phillips Opera House Greatly Improved and There will be a pleasing surprise to those who attend ton-night. Manager Dobbins has not been idle this summer. He has one of the country’s finest scenic artists at work in the Phillips Opera House for several months, and to day there is completed one of the most elaborate outfits of scenery to be found in the state. Artist Tschudi’s taste in this line of work is not to be equaled, and he has painted thirteen beautiful sets of scenery for the theatre, which must be seen to be properly appreciated. Last night a display was made of new property, and the few persons who were given special invitations to be present were more than delighted. There is nothing which adds more to the enjoyment of first-class performance than appropriate scenic effects and this year the patrons of the Phillips will find that all stage settings will be elaborate. Besides this plentiful supply of new scenery Manager Dobbins has gone further. Another new drop curtain has been painted by Mr. Tschudi, and it is a rare specimen of his artistic skill. The big curtain is rich in its coloring, and almost perfect in its execution. The central figure is a splendid reproduction of Turner’s celebrated painting of “The Harbor in Venice,” and it is a picture the eye does not tire to look upon. The stage of the Phillips, which is one of the largest in the state, has been thoroughly renovated and painted and it presents a neat and clean appearance. The entire auditorium will be re-frescoed within a few days, this portion of the work not having yet been completed. The opera house is now in better trim than ever before and the patrons who are in attendance at the opening this evening will not be long in distinguishing this fact” (page 3).

On Aug 24, 1895, “The Richmond item” reported, “Almost finished. Scenic artist Tschudi who has been in Richmond all summer will still be ‘one of us’ for a considerable time. His work of painting the Phillips opera house scenery will be finished next week and then he will begin work at the Grand. Mr. Bradley has given him the contract to paint the entire set of new scenery which will be of the finest and it is probable that he will get started on the work the last of next week” (page 1).

On Sept. 5, 1895, “The Richmond Item” reported, “The plasterers will soon be at work on the opera house. Scenic artist Tschudi has his scaffolding all arranged for painting the scenery for the Grand theatre” (page 4).

Tschudi was still in Richmond at the beginning of 1896. On Feb 26, 1896, “The Richmond Item” reported, “An Item reporter visited the room of Prof. Tschudi, the artist, this morning and took a hasty inspection of a number of his water-color paintings which are to be exhibited the remainder of the week. The collection represents about four years’ work, and some of the pictures re original while others are copies from celebrated paintings. Arranged as they will be at Stigleman’s studio, they certainly will be well worth the inspection of the people, whether they contemplate purchasing or not” (page 4).

In the same newspaper, Tschudi’s name popped up in a court case: “In ‘Squire Jessup’s court a judgement has been rendered against John U. Tschudi for $16 in favor of J. H. Dobbins. The suit was on account.” Whether this signaled a financial downturn or something else, Tschudi soon left town.

By summer, he was working in Lexington, Kentucky. On July 13, 1896, the “Lexington Herald-Leader” reported:

“Magnificent.

Will be Lexington’s Opera House this season.

Scenic artist Tschudi Now Hard at Work. How House will appear.

Everything is business and bustle at the Lexington Opera House, and when the coming theatrical season opens the citizens of Lexington will see one of the handsomest interior of a theatre in the country. Manager Scott will spare neither time or expense in refitting and refurbishing his house. The scenic artist, Mr. J. U. Tschudi, of Chicago, assisted by the old reliable John Uttinger, is already hard at work and has completed a number of handsome places. None of the old scenery will be used, but everything on the stage will be brand new. There will be sixteen new sets, all beautiful and fresh. The new drop curtain is going to be one of the very handsomest in the country, as Mr. Tschudi told a Leader reporter this morning that he was going to try his hand on this especial piece of work and make it guilt edge, so that our theatre goers can expect something beautiful. The work already completed by Mr. Tschudi is magnificent and shows him to be an artist of high rank. Redecorating the auditorium of the Opera House will be commenced at once, as the scaffold is now being erected for the frescoe painters” (page 5).

It was in Lexington, that Tschudi received what may have been the greatest publicity of his career. There were two extensive articles about Tschudi that I am sharing in their entirety. The first was published on Aug. 15, 1896, in “The Daily Leader” of Lexington, Kentucky (page 3). Again, not everything adds up.

“Mr. J. R. Tschudi who painted the New Opera House Drop Curtain.

An artist of some fame.

J. W. Tschudi, of Chicago, the famous scenic artist who has just completed the scenery and the magnificent drop curtain of out Opera House, was born in Switzerland (the land of William Tell) in 1852, and emigrated to America with his parents in 1857, and from childhood, was fond of painting and drawing. While at school he very often got punished for drawing cartoon on his slate, which kept the scholars laughing. After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ‘I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad. My father was a famous fresco artist (in relief); he studied under the old masters in France for ten years. His work can be seen in France, Italy, Switzerland and America at the present time. He died in his 69th year in 1886 in New York.’ Mr. Tschudi is an extensive traveler and had been to all the principal parts of the world. The Leader called on him at the Opera House yesterday, and was shown a beautiful collection of sketches and paintings from all parts of the globe. The artist’s works both in oil and water color, but the last three years there has been no sale for oil paintings, and he has devoted his time entirely to water colors. He says he will give the people of Lexington an exhibition of water color paintings at one of the prominent down-town stores. Mr. Tschudi has been frequently asked why he did not change the spelling of his name, so it would be easily pronounced. He simply answers; “I have no reason to be ashamed of it, as it is famous in Swiss history, being the name of one of the oldest royal families on record, and was borne by artists, generals and men of high rank, and at the present time there are a number of recognized artists in the family. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington until October painting twelve sets of scenery for the new Parkersburg W. Va., theater, which opens about the middle of that month” (page 3).

Another article published in Lexington’s “The Daily Leader” on Aug. 24, 1896, described Tschudi’s scenic art process. I am including the article in its entirety, as this is a wealth of information for future generations:

“Scenery,

And how it is painted by the Theatre Scenic Artist.

Mr. Tschudi Tells the Leader Some of its Mysteries.

Painting a drop curtain.

How the immense canvas is stretched for the work.

A scenic artist’s life a hard one at times.

Mixing paints in buckets.

Few people are acquainted with that part of theater commonly referred to a ‘back of the scenes,’ and fewer persons have a well-defined idea of how scenery for a modern playhouse is painted. A Leader man recently called upon Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who has been busily engaged in painting new scenery for the Lexington Opera House and who is now engaged in painting some for a theater soon to be opened in Parksburg, W. Va. Mr. Tschudi has remained in Lexington to do his work as the facilities here are the very best, and then he has become conveniently settled and likes Lexington. Mr. Tschudi’s drop curtain painted for the Lexington Opera House some weeks ago is certainly a thing of beauty, a masterpiece of scenic art, and has called forth expressions of extreme admiration from all who have seen it. Personally, Mr. Tschudi is a charming man to converse with, always interested in his work and ever ready and willing to impart that interest to others. To the question, ‘where were you born,’ put by the Leader man, Mr. Tschudi said, “I was born in Switzerland in 1852, but am an American artist. I came to the United States in 1857. My father was an artist in France and I, only one of eight children, am an artist. I was fond of it from childhood. When I was a boy, I sometimes got punished for drawing comic sketches on the walls, and I would neglect my lessons to draw those pictures and frequently get kept in school on that account.’

‘Tell me something, Mr. Tschudi about the scenic artist.’

‘The scenic artists,’ said he, ‘do not wear long hair and work with a palette and brushes as most people imagine. He is an ordinary looking man, pleasant in his conversation, and if you see him at work on the paint bridge, you will see him dressed in a neat suit of white overalls and jacket, surrounded by buckets, tomato cans, tin cups, etc. containing the various tints and colors and brushes, some of them as large as our whitewashers use Every large theatre, such as the one here in Lexington, which is well up to the average in modern equipment, is provided with a paint bridge and frame of enormous size. The paint bridge is built at the back wall of the stage, reaching from one fly gallery to the other, all the way from twenty to forty feet above the stage floor, according to the height of the stage, and ranges from four to six feet in width. Between the bridge and the wall there is a paint frame, reaching from one end of the bridge to the other and ranging from 20 by 30 to 40 by 60 feet. Looking at this frame you would think it impossible to move it because of its enormous size and weight, but when you hear the artist say, “Let’er down or up Charley (Charley is the artist’s helper or paint boy) you will see Charley go to the end of the bridge where there is a windlass, take hold with one hand or turn it and the frame is moved up or down as the artist wishes.

‘It may seem strange to you that this paint boy can with ease turn the crank and raise or lower the 40 by 60 feet frame which alone weighs half a ton without the scene that may be on it, also mounted as you see it when finished. However, it is very simple, this monster being hung precisely as a window sash is hung in your house. There is a counterweight attached that balances the frame, and instead of pushing it up like you would a sash, the paint boy turns the crank, and she goes up or down. So, you see, the artist stands on the stationary bridge and can paint a scene by 40 by 60 feet without having to climb up or down a scaffold as you may imagine on seeing some of the enormous scenes in large theaters in cities.

How the artist works.

‘Now, if you will follow, I’ll tell you how the artist works. Stretched on this frame here is, as you see, a canvas 24 by 30 feet, and ‘sized’ as the artist calls it. That is, ready to paint on. With this piece of charcoal tied to a stick, which, I suppose, is about five feet in length. He commences to sketch or outline a scene, which, by the way, is a puzzle to make out at first. Presently, after having mixed all of his colors in his buckets, cans, etc., you will see him apply the colors with large brushes, giving a slap and a dab of color here and there, and before you realize what he is trying to do, you will see the bright sunny sky, the distant hills, the rippling brook, the foliage of trees, and each appear and gradually grow as if by magic until there is a beautiful and finished landscape before you.

‘And all to aid the work of the players,’ suggested the Leader man.

‘Yes, indeed, without the scenic painter’s brush what would the play amount to? The scenic effects carry the principal productions of the present day, as you know.

‘Yes, it was pretty hard at times on the artist, still we had times when we were in not rushed, as some of the scenery which we called stock, such as wood scene, modern street, kitchen, prison, plain, chamber, garden and landscape could be used in some of the modern plays. Sometimes we would have it very easy for a week or two and then again it would be a case of rush.

Artist in a rush.

‘I remember one instance in particular, while getting up the scenery for the Coleen Bawn, there was a tremendous amount of all special scenery to get up. The play was to be put on Monday afternoon matinee. On Saturday night I found myself way behind with the work. The manager came to me, excited and said: ‘Mr. Tschudi, you have been with us for six years and always ready when the time came. By heaven, I am afraid you will not get through in time.’ I said, ‘I never mind, there is lots of time between now and 2 o’clock on Monday, and I will get here just the same.’ I went on the paint bridge Saturday evening after supper and never left until Monday at 11:30, when I had all the scenery finished. It was pronounced by the manager and public as being the grandest production of the Colleen Bawn that had ever been staged. It was pretty hard on me. I went to bed after dinner Monday and slept until Tuesday at 9 o’clock a.m. There are, however, more pleasant things in an artist’s life. Our work is not a burden, it is a life’s study and a pleasure, and I may say I love it. It is the artist who dazzles and deceives the eye and carries you imagination to every part of the globe. When you witness the grand spectacular production, for if you would take the scenic effects away it would be like taking the feathers from the peacock. The bird would be left, but its glory would be gone. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington several weeks while finishing up his work for the Parksburg theater. He may open a temporary studio in Lexington while here, where he will exhibit some of his studies in water colors. A display of his work can now be seen in the show windows of Brower, Scott & Frazee, and they have attracted considerable attention since being put there a few days ago.” (page 3).

By 1897, Tschudi was again listed in the Kansas City Directory, living with his family at 10 East 16th St. His son, also going by John Tschudi, was living with him. He and his son soon had embarked upon a new adventure, traveling with a new form of entertainment – Edison’s warograph. On Dec. 2, 1898, the “Keytesville Chariton Courier” of Keytsville, Missouri, reported, “The Messrs. Tschudi of the ‘War Graphic Co.’ exhibited their moving pictures at Dickenson’s hall, Tuesday evening. The entertainment was well attended, and the illustrations were both instructive and amusing” (page 8). For clarity, this was a moving picture show.

Two years later, Tschudi was still promoting the warograph. On Sept. 18, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” of Newton, Kansas, reported, J. U. Tschudi, with the warograph, who will give war pictures every night at some corner on Main street on a monster screen.”

On Oct. 2, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” went into detail about the attraction in an article entitled, “Warograph in Black Tent.” The article described:

“A very interesting attraction for this week will be the Warograph exhibition in the black tent. This exhibition presents life and action nearly all the battles fought in Cuba and the Phillipines. There you will see the charge of the Rough Riders, battle at San Juan Hill, Evacuation of Havana, Grand Parade of troops at Camp Alger, Destruction of Cevera’s fleet, the Kansas boys fighting before the trenches at Candabar and many other interesting scenes.” The article then quote the Hastings, Nebraska, Republican: “No attraction has commanded a greater patronage nor received more complimentary words than Edison’s Moving War Scenes. This feature of the carnivals has been a ‘hit’ and is certainly worthy of the good words and patronage it has been daily received. It is worth several times the price of admission charged and it is one of the attractive features at the Greater American Exposition at Omaha. The men conducting it are all affable and courteous gentlemen” (page 4).

On Oct. 3, 1899, “The Evening Kansas Republican” published a testimonial about Tschudi’s popular warograph attraction: “Don Kinney received a letter yesterday from E. D. Kipp, a friend of his in Marshal, Mo., who wrote from Fort Scott as follows: ‘I am here looking for attractions and find that your town and Fort Scott have the most of them. The Warograph, handled by J. H. Tschudi, is first class and I can highly recommend it” (page 1).

By 1900, the Tschudi family was living at 2631 Holmes. The household included John Ulrich Tschudi, Marguerite Tschudi, son John Tschudi, and daughter Lucy Tschudi. Their second daughter, Minnie Lillian was no longer part of the household, having married James Edward Brady in 1893. The Brady’s also lived in Kansas City.

Tschudi was still traveling with his warograph. On September 11 and 13, 1900, the “Sedalia Sentinel” of Sedalia, Kansas, published the following article:

“The Pictures are Here.

Splendid Scenes from the Boer War a feature.

Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who was here last year with the warograph pictures in the Ilgenfritz building on Ohio street, returns for the street fair again this year, with a much finer apparatus and a lot of new and interesting pictures, among which are fine views of the Boer war. His location is the leader building, opposite the court house on Ohio street. This is the best and cleanest show going for old and young, and the reputation Mr. Tschudi left last year insures him a splendid patronage. Open day and night” (page 1).

Tschudi traveled all over the country with his entertainment, yet still completed a variety of painting project. On Dec. 27, 1900, the “El Paso Herald” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, the scenic artist, arrived in the city with his wife this morning and will remain here until the carnival week. He has had a great deal of experience in decorating floats and his services can be secured by those who wish to put out floats and have not made arrangements” (page 5).  He was in town for the live stock exhibit and parade the morning of the 18th].

By 1910, Tschudi had relocated to St. Louis, Missouri; his family remained in Kansas City. Tschudi now lived by himself, listed as an artist and residing at 726 S 2nd Street, St. Louis. The 1910 census report listed him as a widower. The same census report listed his wife as married.  

Tschudi’s son and wife continue to live together on Holmes Street in Kansas City for the next two decades, although they moved from 2631 Holmes to 2751 Holmes. Tschudi’s son returned to using his adoptive name – John Fohrman. The 1910 Census listed Fohrman’s occupation as an artist in the Scenic Co. industry. He continued to work as a scenic artist until his passing, frequently working for the Kansas City Scenic Co. Nothing really changed for Fohrman or his mother until 1928. On October 13, 1928, Fohrman married Florence Lee Smith; Smith lived just down the street at 2709 Holmes. Marguerite continued to live with her son until 1931, when she passed. Her obituary made no mention of any former husband:

“TSCHUDI – Mrs. Marguerite Tschudi, 81 years old, died last night at the home of her son, John Fohrman, 2751 Holmes Street. Mrs. Tschudi was born in Luxemburg and came to Kansas City from Europe in 1885. Also surviving are a daughter, Mrs. Lucy Armbruster, wife of Benjamin G. Armbruster of the advertising department, Harris-Goar Company, who lives at 2711 Holmes street; a brother, John Merkes, Dubuque, Iowa and a sister, Mrs. Anna Miller, St. Louis.” It appears that Marguerite altered a little of her own history too– or it was an honest misprint.

After his mother’s passing in 1931, John and Florence Fohrman relocated west to California, settling in Los Angeles. In 1946, they moved to Culver City. Fohrman passed away on Jan 29, 1952. His obituary announced:

“John Joseph Fohrman Rites Set Tomorrow.

Services will be held tomorrow at 11 a.m. at the chapel of Smith & Salsbury for John Joseph Fohrman, 83, of 4208 Lafayette, who died Wednesday morning. He leaves his widow, Florence, and a daughter Lucia Fohrman. Born in Chicago, he had lived in Culver City for six years. He was a scenic artist. Rev. Eldred Charles, of the Cardiff Avenue Christian Church, will officiate. The remains will be cremated.”

In regard to the passing of his father, John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr.; Tschudi never left St. Louis. His career began to fade away, and his name no longer made headlines. Until his passing in 1921, Tschudi continued to work as an artist and live at South Second Street. His death certificate listed that he was 70 yrs. old, an artist, and a widower. Tschudi passed away at 614 N. 2nd in St. Louis, His death certificate listed his parents as John Tschudi and Margaretha Egli – both born in Switzerland. The informant listed on Tschudi’s death certificate was Wm Deven. A small note at the bottom indicates that he was buried in Kansas City. I have yet to locate his grave.

Seven years prior to Tschudi’s passing, he painted “Early Days on the Mississippi.” This may be his only extant painting, as I am unable to locate any other easel artworks by Tschudi;. “Early Days on the Mississippi” may be Tschudi’s sole artistic legacy; the only artwork that marks the life and career of John Ulrich Tschud, Jr.

However, it is the 1914 date and the Mississippi subject matter that is also significant.

In 1914, St. Louis commemorated the 150th anniversary of its founding; as part of the celebration, the City commissioned a two-part civic spectacle. The Pageant and Masque of Saint Louis was presented on the slop of Art Hill in Forest Park from May 28 to June 1, 1914. The pageant used an enormous stage built on pilings in the Grand Basin, measuring over 500 ft. wide and 200 ft. deep. The pageant featured a cast of 7500 volunteers. Some records suggest that there were 75,000 people in attendance on opening night. Three hundred years of local history were presented over the course of five hours, including many scenes from early years on the Mississippi River. Many historic photographs of this spectacle remain, depicting the incredible grandeur of the event. Some are digitally accessible through the St. Louis Public Library as part of the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis Collection.

Detail of a scene from the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis in 1914. Here is the link to the photograph: https://cdm17210.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/pageant/id/155/rec/55

I firmly believe that Tschudi’s painting was one of many, commissioned advertise the event; advertisements that depicted various scenes from the pageant. This is why the edges of Tschudi’s painting are hemmed, include a painted frame, and title. This artwork was intended to be tacked to a wall, as any advertisement. This painted composition was most likely part of a series depicting significant historical events reenacted at the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis in 1914.

I congratulate the Kimmswick Historical Society’s decision to invest in the preservation of Tschudi’s artwork for many future generations to come.