Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. Employee No. 53 – Mr. McAndrews

Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

In 1899, there was a “Mr. McAndrews” representing the Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio. At the time, the firm was going after a scenery project in Barre, Vermont, bidding against Huoist Theatrical Scenery of Troy, New York.

“On May 11, 1899, the “Barre Evening Telegram” reported, “The city council met in special session last night to confer with several representatives of scenic houses about scenery for the new opera house. Mr. McAndrews, representing Sosman & Landis of Chicago advocated raising a portion of the roof 38 feet wide 5 feet above the present altitude. Mr. Huoist, representing a firm in Troy, N.Y., showed a model and sample of scenery. Advocated the use of trip lines and leaving the roof the same as present. Both are prepared to submit estimates by next Tuesday. Mr. Morton agreed to add the stripe to the decorations of the rooms in the city hall and a resolution was adopted awarding him the contract for $250. Executive session to consider some other bids on scenery” (page 1).

By May 17, 1899, the “Barre Evening Telegram” announced “Scenery Let. Huoist Theatrical Scenery Co., of Troy, N.Y., the Successful Bidders. The Price to be $1,226 for Nine Complete Scenes. Sosman & Landis $52 Higher for Less Pieces” (page 1). Sosman & Landis were the nearest competitors to Huoist, but their price for $1,278 was for several fewer pieces.

It has been a challenge to track down “Mr. McAndrews,” as it is extremely difficult to locate a scenic artist or salesman with a common last name. However, I believe that this was E. H. McAndrews, also known as Edward H. McAndrew; over the years, the “s” was dropped from the last name. Both Edward H., and his brother Robert T., McAndrews, worked as scenic artists in the East, primarily contracting projects in Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Vermont.

Edward was a very typical example of the scenic artist/salesman hired by Sosman & Landis at this time. Since the founding of the firm,  Sosman & Landis hired regional scenic artists, those familiar with a specific area of the country, to go after scenery jobs beyond the Midwest.  This made sense, as it gave them not only access to local theatre networks, but also added credibility to their firm when competing against regional competitors.

Edward was one of four children born to Patrick McAndrews and Agnes E. Calhoun between 1859 and 1865.  The oldest child Francis “Frank” was born in 1859 and youngest child, Elizabeth, was born six years later in 1865. Edward and Robert were the middle children. In 1870, the McAndrews family was living in Pottsville, Schuylkill, Pennsylvania. At the time, the children listed at home were: Frank (11 yrs.), Robert (8 yrs.), Edward (6 yrs.) and Elizabeth (5 yrs.).

Patrick McAndrews passed away in 1875, leaving a wife with young children still at home.  Agnes was still listed in the Pottsville City Directory over a decade later, as it appears, she never moved. In 1887, when was living with Robert at “Race c Lawson.” Although Robert was listed as a boiler maker at the time, he was working as an artist two years later. In 1888, Edward was also working as an artist in the area.  On August 3, 1888, the Sunbury, Pennsylvania, “Northumberland County Democrat” reported, “Prof. E. H. McAndrew, an artist, who works from nature, has arrived in this city and intends getting up a class. He has recently been in Shamokin and Easton and comes highly recommended”  (page 1). Shamokin was located approximately halfway between Pottsville and Sunbury, to the west.  Easton was near Allentown, Pennsylvania.

It remains unclear as to when Edward and Robert began their scenic art careers, but both completed projects in larger metropolitan cities by the 1890s. By 1896, Edward was credited as a “well-known” scenic artist. On April 21, 1896, the “Fall River Globe” of Fall River, Massachusetts, reported, “Corse Payton is the only manager of popular price attractions that has discovered the secret of being able to carry scenery for eight first class productions and give attention to every little detail. Having the scenery, costumes, properties and other effects as the experienced stage manager requires for proper presentation of each play in the repertoire. All of the scenery used is the finest that can be painted and is from the brush of E. H. McAndrew, a well-known artist who has painted some of the most elaborate spectacular productions of the day. Everything that is used on stage is carried by Mr. Payton, who guarantees perfect satisfaction and will refund twice the amount paid for any ticket by any person not perfectly satisfied with any of his performances. Yesterday’s productions were presented to full houses and the general verdict was that the company was much superior to many of the high-priced attractions. In a word the company is one of rare excellence, and well worthy of the public patronage. Tonight ‘The Galley Slave’ will be presented, and tomorrow there will be two grand bills, ‘East Lynne’ in the afternoon. And ‘The Plunger’ in the evening” (page 6). Fall River is about sixty miles south of Boston where McAndrews both lived and worked.

By 1900, Edward was living in Philadelphia, but continuing to work as a scenic artist and performer throughout the region. Edward also worked in Manchester, New Hampshire, where he met his future wife Dora G. Shaw.

On Nov. 15, 1900, Edward married Dora “Grace” Shaw in Boston. Grace was the daughter of railroad electrician, Eugene Shaw, and dressmaker, Susan A. Shaw, born on Jan. 14, 1877 in Barnet, Vermont. Their marriage license listed Grace’s current residence as Manchester, New Hampshire; with Edward’s current residence as Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Edward and Grace listed their occupations as actor and actress, respectively.

McAndrews continued to work as a both a performer and scenic artist. On May 14, 1901, the “Portsmouth Herald,” announced, “E. H. McAndrews, the scenic artist of Manchester was in town today” (Portsmouth, New Hampshire, page 6). At this same time, his brother, R. H. McAndrew, was listed as a scenic painter in the Manchester, New Hampshire, City Directory, boarding at the Hotel Windsor. The two continued to work throughout the region.

By 1908, Edward and his wife Grace were living in Barnet, Vermont, Grace’s hometown. In Barnet, they celebrated the birth of their only son, John, sometime between 1908 and 1910; records vary for his birth year.

The family then moved to Canada, although this date is a little flexible too, ranging from 1906 to 1910. It is possibly that Edward was working in Toronto, while Grace raised their son in Vermont, but everything is a bit sketchy. Much of the information pertaining to the Edward McAndrews life in Toronto was included in a 1921 Canadian Census. That year, the McAndrew household included Edward, Grace, John and Susan A. Shaw (Grace’s mother). At the time,  Edward’s occupation was listed as an artist in the theatre industry, listing 1906 as his year of immigration.

The McAndrews returned to the United States by 1930, although the exact date remains uncertain. The 1930 US Federal Census that listed E. H. McAndrew as a scenic artist in Wilmington, Middlesex, Mass., living with his wife Grace, son John, mother-in-law Susan and brother, Robert T. McAndrew. Robert was listed as a sign painter.

I have located precious little about Edward or Robert after this.  However, Edward passed away four years later. His obituary was published in the “Boston Globe” on October 12, 1934:

“MCANDREW- In Wilmington, Oct 11, Edward H. Funeral from his later home, Middlesex av., Saturday Oct. 13, at 8:15 a.m. Requiem high mass at St. Thomas’ Church, Wilmington, at 9 o’clock. Relatives and friends are invited” (page 12). He was still living in Wilmington at the time. Edward H. McAndrew is buried at Wildwood Cemetery in Wilmington, Mass.

The grave of Edward H. McAndrew and Dora Grace Shaw McAndrews at Wildwood Cemetery in Wilmington, Massachusetts. I believe that his birth year is incorrect on this stone.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois


Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Maquette and scenic pieces from the Scenery Collection, stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.

The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois

Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Maquette and scenic pieces from the Scenery Collection, stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.

The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois


Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Maquette and setting from the Scenery Collection, stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.

The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois

Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Maquette and scenery for CARMEN. Artifacts from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.

The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois


Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Maquette and scenery. Artifacts from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.

The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Chicago Lyric Opera Collection in DeKalb, Illinois


Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.

Examples of scenic art and similar maquette from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.


The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.

Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Scottish Rite Scenery Collection in McAlester, Oklahoma.

Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Rae Waszut-Barrett

On November 17, 1930, Thomas G. Moses was credited with the scenic art for the Scottish Rite Temple in McAlester, Oklahoma.  In  section entitled “Giant Stage Equipment is Feature of New Temple,” the following was written about Moses’ scenic contribution to the project:

“Outstanding among the features of the new Scottish Rite temple are the size of the big stage provided and its equipment. The scenery will long be remembered by the persons who see it in use. This very important part of the equipment was designed and painted by Thomas G. Moses, representing the Wm. Lemle Studios and the National Theatre Supply company, of Chicago.”

The work was contracted two years earlier, with Moses presenting models to the McAlester Scottish Rite representatives. Although it was Moses who landed the project, the McAlester Scottish Rite contracted the National Theatre Supply Co. for the work. The National Theatre Supply Co. then subcontracted the work to the William Lemle studios, who in turn hired Moses, as was the understanding in the contract.

This project did not go according to plan and in the end the McAlester Scottish Rite Masons refused to pay the full amount owed, citing that some of the pieces of scenery were damaged during shipment, even though Moses repaired each of the damaged pieces cited by the Valley. The drawn-out collection process directly affected Moses. As the official supplier and client bickered about who should file a claim with the railroad for damaged goods, Moses was left in a dire financial situation at the onset of the Great Depression, begging to be paid for his work.  

Due to the size of the drops and scope of the project, there were several shipments of scenery in 1929, yet only one was partially damaged. Problems between the theatrical suppliers and McAlester Scottish Rite began well before any damage was cited. The first issues were in the form of delayed payments. On Aug. 2, 1929, Moses wrote directly to the McAlester Scottish Rite Secretary, W. P. Freeman, noting that they had not received the $1,000 July 1st advance payment, although the project was well underway. Freeman explained that the check had been sent, but it never arrived that fall. By Dec. 3, 1929, McAlester was behind two payments, totaling $2,000. This time, P. Lester Landis of the National Theatre Supply Co. wrote a letter to Freeman at the McAlester Scottish Rite, notifying him of the deficiency. The $2,000 was paid two weeks later.

And then there was a damaged shipment from a leaky rail car. The initial letter citing the damage, sent from the McAlester Scottish Rite representatives to the National Supply Co., was purportedly returned as “undeliverable.” This is after continued correspondence for a year. The McAlester Scottish Rite then sent a second letter, this time directly to Moses at William Lemle’s studio.  Moses immediately responded on Nov. 12, 1929, writing, “We called the representative of the C & E I, who took the shipment, and he assured us that he would communicate immediately with the representative in Tulsa, and that he would come to McAlester, where you can show him the damaged pieces. If this is possible, and I trust it is, and he in turn will notify us and I am sure we can establish the cost of repairing. This of course, will not be done until I come to McAlester next summer, to touch up and match the pieces which you found un-painted…it is almost impossible to do this work without being set up on the stage, which is the same reason some of them were not finished. So whatever damage there has been done to the drops or set pieces in this shipment, will be taken care of at that time, so please do not worry about it.”

Keep in mind that many final touches to scenery occurred after stage machinery was added to each drop for various scenic effects.

Moses also explained, “As long as you have the drops in a dry place that is all that is necessary. I have never known one of the shipments to go out that did not require more or less touching-up when they were installed.” 

I personally think that the damage occurred somewhere between the railway depot and the temple, not necessarily in transit from Illinois to Oklahoma.  All it would take is a rainstorm with a work crew who decided to transport the scenery from the depot to the temple regardless of the weather conditions.

In the meantime, Moses completed the McAlester Scottish Rite scenery and repaired all of the damaged goods. It was not until Nov. 30, 1930, that the damage and completed work, however, was inspected by Louis “Lou” E. Lounsbery.  After his visit, the McAlester Scottish Rite wrote to Moses noting that Lounsbery looked over his work and stated, “he is greatly pleased with your work and had many good and nice things to say about you.” There was no mention about any dissatisfaction with Moses’ repair of the damaged scenes – at all.  

Interestingly, two weeks prior to the letter, Lounsbery was mentioned in an article about the new stage. The article reported, “The scenic equipment was given to Lou Lounsbery, former McAlester resident and prominent worker in the Scottish Rite for years, to plan, as he had some big effects in mind and had investigated several large temples, the last two which were at Fort Scott, Kansas, and Oakland, California [both Moses installations]. Constantly getting closer to his idea of big effects, Thomas Moses was called to Los Angeles to consult with Lounsbery. After several meetings and the showing of a number of miniature sets, Mr. Moses was instructed to proceed with models and these were brought to McAlester.” If there were any deficiencies with the repaired scenery by November 1930, it was not mentioned in their letter to Moses. That being said, the dissatisfaction may have originated from a new source. From the beginning of the project to the final payment, there was a changing of the guard at the McAlester Scottish Rite in the form of a new secretary.  When a new secretary of SGIG becomes involved with an existing project, it can change everything, including fair dealings; I know, as I have encountered this a few times.

On September 11, 1930, Moses wrote to the McAlester Scottish Rite Bodies, “I trust that you realize that we have a great deal more in this contract than has been advanced to us. Of course, we expected this to a certain extent, but work has been much more expensive than we estimated and we are cramped for ready means.” Part of the problem was size; you can only store so much scenery that measures 40’ high by 56’ wide while waiting for a payment. Moses tried to remedy these continued delays for the collection of the final payment.  By this time, Moses had implemented a practice of not leaving a Masonic job until final payment was collected.

The final amount for the scenery was to be paid directly to Moses upon his arrival to McAlester for the final installation. On September 26, the National Supply Co. even sent a letter to the new McAlester Scottish Rite Secretary, Lawton Beasley, confirming that final payment should be handed to Moses on site and not mailed to the company. Again, this step was requested by Moses, and likely because the McAlester Scottish Rite had established a pattern of delayed payments to the National Theatre Supply Co. The McAlester Scottish Rite did issue a final payment before Moses’ departure, one that was handed to Moses directly. Unfortunately, it was for less for than the amount owed.

In the end, the McAlester Scottish Rite decided to not file for damaged goods with the railroad company and decided to just deduct that amount from their final payment, citing, “Under the contract these curtains were to be installed by your company in perfect condition.” They acknowledge that the National Theatre Supply Co. paid Moses $120 to repair the damage as well as possible, and then simply deducted the $120 fee for Moses from the final damage estimate. This meant that they chose not to pay the remaining $807.00 of the contractual agreement. In effect they breached the contract. That is today’s equivalent of $12,640.52 – no small amount.

The McAlester Scottish Rite even took the time to draw up an agreement justifying this reduced amount and stated that the National theatre Supply Co. would collect the remaining funds from the railway for damaged goods.  The McAlester Scottish Rite then took the time to write a second letter to Moses, sending it via. William Lemle studio. They reiterated that Moses did the best he could with all of the repairs, but the scenery was still not in “perfect condition,” and therefore, they should not have to pay full price. In the end, it was the William Lemle Co., that took the time to file the claim with the railroad and collect the payment for scenery damage in caused during transit.

In regard to the McAlester Scottish Rite’s citing that Moses’ repairs left the Valley with scenery in less than “perfect condition,” I have a few comments. When considering the caliber of Moses’ work and his experience, leaving any scene in a bad state directly reflected in HIS reputation.  As Moses had several more upcoming Scottish Rite projects, leaving any example of poor work would jeopardize future Masonic projects.

Furthermore, I evaluated the McAlester Scottish Rite scenery collection in 2010 and  encountered no existing damage that would have substantiated their claim and decision for a reduced payment. It was in far better shape than most Scottish Rite scenery collections and absent of areas indicating massive water-damage. The painting was still beautiful and in great shape. If anything, the biggest issue was some dusting, repairs from constant used and failed netting; a standard deterioration after eighty years of use. Here are a few of the McAlester Scottish Rite Scenes.

Painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1929-1930.
Painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1929-1930.
Painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1929-1930.
Painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1929-1930.
Painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1929-1930.

For more information about Scottish Rite degree productions, scenery and stage machinery, visit www.drypigment.net and keyword search “Scottish Rite.”

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: McAlester, Oklahoma

Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Rae Waszut-Barrett

Design and scenery by Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934). In 1929, Moses was representing William Lemle, Inc., when he painted the scenery installation for the Scottish Rite Theatre in McAlester, Oklahoma, 1929. The scenes measured 40′-0″ high by 56′-0″ wide.

Design by Thomas G. Moses
Painted scene by Thomas G. Moses, 1929
Painted detail by Thomas G. Moses

For more posts about the McAlester Scottish Rite and other Masonic scenery collections use the keyword search function.

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1156 – The Dallas Shrine, 1923

Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

In 1923 Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Did a model for the Dallas Shrine, which was accepted, and we built it and found we were way too low, as the carpenters managed to put in a lot of time.”  The project was for ceremonials activities conducted by Hella Temple, A.A.O.N.M.S. Desert of Texas, Oasis of Dallas.

Fez for Hella Temple Shriner

On May 5, 1923, the “Courier-Gazette” reported, “The Dallas Shriners are making preparations for the entertainment of five thousand Nobles who are to assemble from various sections of the state for the magnificent spectacle and initiation” (McKinney, TX, page 2). A week later, the “Corsicana Daily Sun” reported, “The members of Hella Temple under the leadership of its Potentate Al. H. Reed, will gather in Dallas on Friday, May 11th, for the spring Ceremonial Session at which time it is expected that over four hundred candidates from the jurisdiction will be initiated. A large amount of the fees received by the Dallas Shrine from initiation of candidates is being used in payment of the hospital appropriation. The Dallas Shriners are making preparation of the entertainment of five thousand Nobles who are to assemble from various sections of the state for the magnificent spectacle and initiation” (May 12, 1923, page 8). At the ceremonial held in May the Dallas Shriners took up a collection for their new children’s hospital, raising an additional fund of $9,000” (The Marshall Messenger, 16 June 1923, page 4).

Hella Temple program cover

By 1923, Dallas had a membership of over seven thousand Nobles, the greater part of whom resided in the north, east and central Texas (Courier -Gazette, McKinney, TX, 5 May 1923, page 2). At this time, the Masonic Fraternity in the State of Texas numbered over one hundred twenty thousand. Big funds were pouring into the Fraternity, being applied to both charitable works and extravagant membership events.

Although Moses was not yet a Freemason, it was Moses’ past history with the Fraternity in Dallas that helped land the 1923 Shrine project. Moses first painted Masonic scenery for Dallas in 1909, the same years that Sosman & Landis landed six Scottish Rite contracts. Sosman & Landis delivered scenery and stage machinery to the Dallas Scottish Rite. I am including a brief recap of this project, as it provided inroads to other Masonic work in the region, especially the Dallas Shrine.

Hella Temple program cover
Hella Temple program cover

Although Dallas Scottish Rite was not completed until 1913, degree productions took place on the stage by 1909. The scenery contract for the stage was negotiated by Bestor G. Brown of M. C. Lilley & Co. and subcontracted to Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio. In a July 7, 1912 letter from Brown to William G. Bell of the Austin Scottish Rite, he included information about the Dallas Scottish Rite stage: “the Dallas stage has in the neighborhood of 25,000 lineal feet of wire and rope in its installation.”

On April 26, 1913, the “Dallas Morning News” described the Masonic Cathedral and Architect Herbert M. Green’s contributions. Keep in mind that the theater of the building was referred to as “the great degree room.” The article reported, “The largest stage in Texas is in this degree room – and the largest pipe organ…a 24 feet deep and 60 feet in width. One hundred and nineteen scenic drops are so delicately counterweighted that the stage picture can be changed in two seconds, and if necessary, in the dark.” Here is a link to my post about the 1909 Dallas Scottish Rite scenery project: https://drypigment.net2019/01/26/tales-from-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-part-627-the-dallas-scottish-rite-1909/

The next time Moses mentioned Masonic projects in Dallas was 1921. While in town working on the Majestic Theatre, he wrote, “During the stay, I furnished a big set for the Shrine which was done in Chicago.” This was in the midst of a massive membership explosion. From 1920 to 1926, Masonic membership in Dalla more than doubled, going from 4,098 to 9,935. This was during a time when lodges all over the country churned out members for the sake of record membership numbers. It is really a perfect example of quantity over quality, and quantity secured unprecedented funding.

Moses was still completing projects for the Dallas Shrine in 1926. That year Moses wrote, “Several drops for the Dallas Shrine gave us another little boost in color, also several drops for Detroit.” The size of Masonic projects kept the studio afloat.

Example of one Shrine ceremonial setting. Butte, Montana, 1921.
Hella Temple Shriners remain active despite a drop in membership

To be continued…