Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
Examples of historic scenic art from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.
The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.
Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.
Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
Examples of historic scenic art from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.
The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.
Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.
Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
Examples of historic scenic art from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University. The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.
Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.
Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
Examples of historic scenic art from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.
The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.
Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.
Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
Examples of historic scenic art from the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.
The Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. The stage settings illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blueprints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings. Unfortunately, some of the scenery has been damaged since initial documentation. The roof leaks and flooding is a problem due to non-working sump pumps.
Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.From the Scenery Collection stored in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University.
Update: The building that housed this collection was sold without the University disclosing the contents. The fate of these historic stage artifacts remain unknown at this time.
We all experience those unique moments in life that fuel our artistic passions. We may be 18 or 80, but that moment is unforgettable and guides our path. At the University of Minnesota, I went from performance to painting in the blink of an eye. Historic scenery brought focus to my chaotic aspirations.
I first attended USITT as an undergraduate in 1989. That year the conference was held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The USITT Expo floor contained a potpourri of historic scenery and models that had been recently acquired by the School of Theatre and Dance at Northern Illinois University. This was during the same time that Lance Brockman was acquiring several historic design collections for the University of Minnesota, including the Twin City Scenic Co. collection, the Great Western Stage Equipment Co. Collection and Holak Collection.
Wendy Waszut at USITT in 1989.Wendy Waszut at USITT in 1989.Painted detailfrom the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.
The scenery on display at USITT was a very small sample of a much larger collection that was documented by Alexander F. Adducci in the 1980s. He painstakingly photographed each artifact with a crew of students and produced an exceptional slide collection. The slides were initially used as a teaching resource. Adducci was listed as the curator for “A Collection of Late 19th and Early 20th Century Scenic Art, Containing 3100 Color Images, Documenting a Rich Period of American and European Scene Painting and Opera Design.” The slide collections sold by the University of Northern Illinois were purchased by a variety of academic institutions and archives throughout the country in the late twentieth-century. Many of the slides now sit in their archival sleeves, carefully protected and often inaccessible. They remain untouched. Here is the link to the slide collection at the University of Minnesota: https://archives.lib.umn.edu/repositories/9/resources/1907
This collection ignited my own spark, a spark that continued to be kindled by dry pigment and barrels of size water. At the time, I did not truly understand the historical or cultural significance of the collection, only seeing the beauty of the brushwork. It is only now that I recognize the international significance of this collection. As the slide inventory states,”Housed in the Arts Annex of the College of Visual and Performing Arts at Northern Illinois University, the Scenic Collection includes elements from the settings of 90 operas, with approximately 900 backdrops and borders and more than 2200 framed scenic units. These sets illustrate an exceptional range of production styles between 1889 and 1932, reflecting the influence of Realism, Romanticism, Impressionism, Modernism and Art Nouveau in scene painting. In addition to the scenery there are 3 dimensional units including furniture and properties. Furthermore, the collection is supported by an extraordinary archive of production notebooks, property lists, inventories, expense records, performance time sheets, correspondence, original photographs of the sets, selected costumes, and opera stars of the period, ground plans and blue prints, painters elevations and renderings, original costume and set design drawings, and 120 exquisitely painted and detailed ¼” scale maquettes of the settings.”
Backdrop from the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.Backdrop detail from the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.Painted detail from the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.From the Scenery Collection at USITT in 1989.
In an odd twist of fate, the Scenery Collection popped back onto my radar a few years ago while attending another USITT conference in Fort Lauderdale. I have since reacquainted myself with the collection as its future is in peril.I am going to start sharing images of these extraordinary artifacts, now housed in a leaking warehouse with an uncertain future. Although these precious pieces have been quarantined for quite some time, they deserve another moment under the spotlights. I will be working with Dave Doherty, and we will bring every nook and cranny of this collection to you online. Here are a few photos from when the scenery was featured at USITT in 1989.
In 1889, the Bostonians extended their tour to visit the Pacific states, including some remote mountain towns west of Denver. Previously known as the Boston Ideal Opera Company, the company traveled under the management of three principals, Karl, MacDonald and Barnabee.
“Fatinitza” was performed the Bostonians at the Tabor Opera House in 1889.
The Bostonians visited the Tabor Opera House in Leadville in July 1899, performing “Fatinitza” for a filled house. On July 8, 1889, the “Carbonate Chronicle” announced, “The great operatic event of the year in Leadville will be the appearance of the famous Bostonians. The success of the company has indeed been flattering – it is an American organization of which Americans may just feel proud.”
Scene from Act I of “Fatinitza.” A Russian Outpost on the Danube River.A shutter depicting a winter scene and a “Fatinitza” set piece labeled for act one of the opera.Label on the door to the shack, showing this was used in “Fatinitza” at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.
On June 24, 1889, the “Leadville Daily Chronicle” described how the extension of the Bostonian tour, expand their territory to Leadville. The article reported, “During their last engagement in Chicago a proposition to tour the leading cities of the Pacific slope was made to them by Will J. Davis, manager of the Haymarket theater in that city, acting for himself and Al Hayman, the manager of Baldwin’s theater and the New California theater of San Francisco. Terms were agreed upon, after some deliberation, for it was something unusual for this company to prolong its season so far into the summer as this tour is completed. However, all objections were surmounted, and Messrs. Hayman and Davis secured the celebrated singers by paying them a good round certainty for ten weeks. The speculative managers assumed the entire risk. The Bostonians left Chicago Sunday, April 28, for Los Angeles, where they sang the week of May 6. Then followed the tremendous four weeks success in San Francisco which has but recently closed. The company opens to-morrow night in Denver, following with engagements at Pueblo, Leadville, Colorado Springs, Lincoln, Nebraska, Omaha, and Sioux City. The company numbers some seventy-odd people, and includes all the principal artists, chorus singers and members of their own orchestra. They travel by special train and in very good style, it being the intention of Karl, Barnabee, and MacDonald, the proprietors, to furnish sleeping car accommodations for the entire company at their own expense. Costumes, personal baggage and special scenery help make the size of the special quite as large as most regular trains. The personnel of this company, anyway considered, is not approached by any similar organization in the country. It is almost wholly Bostonian, the exception being credited to Chicago, in the case of the three principals, while Cincinnati and Baltimore are credited with one each. There is a distinct New England flavor to the chorus and orchestra. The independent airs of the Boston girl are plainly present in the pretty young ladies in the chorus, while the young men might pass for Harvard students.”
In 1889 the Bostonians transcontinental tour also stopped at the Grand Opera House in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The “Leadville Daily Chronicle” rejoiced, “At last! After countless visits to Colorado by that greatest of all operatic organization, the Bostonians, Leadville will see them. While in the city last Thursday, Manager Peter McCourt of the Tabor Grand, Denver completed the arrangements whereby the great company will visit Leadville, the dates having been fixed on Monday and Tuesday, July 1 and 2” (June 24, 1889). However, the best laid plans don’t always work, and the troupe rearranged a section of the tour as Emma Abbot had already performed in “Bohemian Girl.”
On July 1, 1889, Leadville’s “Carbonate Chronicle” announced, “The ‘Bostonians’ Will Come Next Week and Give Us Two Treat.” The article continued, “The final arrangements were completed yesterday and the great organization with its many superb singers will give two performances at the Tabor Opera House. It was first decided, when Mr. Dailey, representing the company, was in Leadville, to play here on Monday and Tuesday, giving “Bohemian Girl” and “Fatiniza.” Learning that the former opera had been played here by the Abbott company, it was thought best to change that and also the dates, playing Pueblo and Colorado Springs before Leadville and also give Aspen a chance to see this really wonderful company. The state-tour, therefore, will be as follows: Monday, Colorado Springs; Tuesday and Wednesday, Pueblo; Thursday and Friday, Leadville; Saturday, Aspen. The “Musketeers” and “Fatinitza” will be played in the Cloud City, in the order named. The selection is a splendid one and could not have been bettered, The Bostonians will tour the state in their special train. The mounting and costuming of the opera’s will be one of the features at the Tabor. Among the principals appearing in the “Musketeers” will be Juliette Corden, Louise Bianchi, Carlotta Maconda, Josephine Bartlett, Gertrude Colby, W. H. McDonald, Edward Hoff, H. C. Barnabee and Fred Dixon. Marie Stoue and Jessie Bartlett Davis will be among the principals in “Fatinitza.”
Poster from an 1879 production of “Fatinitza.”
In 1889, the Bostonians toured with five rail cars: two Pullman buffet and sleeping cars, a day coach and two baggage cars (Sioux City Journal, 14 July 1889, page 9). Besides the principal artists there were thirty singers in the grand chorus, thirteen orchestral performers, and baggage, scene and property masters; seventy people toured with the company (Los Angeles Herald, 5 May 1889, page 3). The company toured with settings for six operas, but this did not mean that they were limited to those productions. In Leadville, “The Three Musketeers” replaced the anticipated “Bohemian Girl.” Also, not all communities or venues could support six full-scale productions. For example, the Bostonians performed only two operas in Leadville, while the advertised for six at Salt Lake City’s Grand Opera. This mean that the company toured with a significant amount of special scenery, and multiple shows necessitated careful labeling of each piece; individual pieces would be labeled for immediate identification. This is not to say that the Bostonians did not supplement their special scenery with stock scenery from the various venues, but they would have also used clearly labeled scenery. “Fatinitza,” required only three settings for the three-act opera; a Russian Outpost on the Danube; Izzet Pasha’s Harem; and Count Kantchukoff’s Palace.
Before the “Fatinitza” door was cleaned and documented. Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.After the “Fatinitza” door was cleaned and documented. Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.
There is a door piece at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville that is clearly labeled “Fatinitza, Act 1st in 1, LH.” The extant door was for the Russian outpost on the Danube. Interestingly, the set piece does not stylistically match any of the other scenic items at the venue.
However, there remains one lone shutter that depicts half of a winter scene. Is it possible that a touring production left a scenic piece as they quickly packed up for their next stop? None of the other attic scenery was specifically marked for a show. The only common markings were on wings for groove set positions, such as L1 and R1. This would indicate stage left, first position and stage right, first position; down stage grooves.
As I was contemplating the possibility of the Bostonians, or another touring company, leaving a scenic piece at the Tabor Opera House, I came across an article in the “Los Angeles Daily Herald” from 1889. On May 5, an article about the Bostonians 1889 Transcontinental tour reported, “Nothing ever used in any of the many operas they present has been left behind. Scene, property, costume, and in fact every accessory to a perfectly finished performance of each opera was brought along” (page 3). Los Angeles was their first stop on the tour. I have to wonder if this was still the case as the tour neared an end in Leadville, and the elevation took its toll on both performers and stagehands.
“Fatinitza” returned to the Tabor Opera House in Leadville four years later. On April 20, 1893, the “Leadville Daily Chronicle” advertised three upcoming operas performed by a much smaller company, the Calhoun Opera Co. Their line up included “Fatinitza,” “Said Pasha” and “Boccaccio.” The shows were produced on a much smaller scale than the Bostonians in 1889. Instead of the Bostonian’s seventy-member company, the Calhoun Opera company toured with only forty people. Of these forty individuals, five of them constituted the orchestra. Reviews for the Calhoun Opera Co. shows were mediocre. Leadville’s “Herald Democrat” announced “an evenly balanced company.” The article continued, “One of the striking features of the Calhoun Opera Company is the nice equilibrium of the principles in producing artistic effects. They have been very intelligently selected, and the proprietor and chief manager, Mr. Shunk of Chicago, is to be congratulated on having organized a company that is compact and even well equipped to gain popular favor.”
Regardless of which touring company left the outpost hut for “Fatinitza,” the construction dates are approximately, 1885 to 1895.
Detail of the “Fatinitza” hut at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.Only one half of a winter scene remains. A shutter that was stored in the Tabor Opera House attic for over a century. Leadville, Colorado.Painted detail of a winter scene shutter at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.Painted detail of a winter scene shutter at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.Painted detail of a winter scene shutter at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.Flat sheaves were placed at the bottom of the winter scene shutter, allowing it to effortlessly roll on and off stage during scene changes.
There were two events held the 1880s that drew scenic artists together in America – the Cincinnati Opera Festival (1881) and the Scenic Artists Show (1885). Henry E. Burcky participated in both events.
In 1880, Henry E. Burcky was a scenic artist Hooley’s Opera House in Chicago. At the time, he was working with Charles E. Petford. The two were credited with the scenery for “The Hearts of Oak.” A review in the “Chicago Tribune” reported, “Hooley’s scenic artists -Petford and Burcky- have spared no pains to present the drama properly. It affords fine opportunity for the painter, and in six elaborate sets we find that the opportunity has been improved. The first act, representing sunset on the coast of Marblehead, shows a cleverly-executed piece of work, and the storm, the sighing of the wind and the sound of the waves beating on the rocks, the wreck, the rescue, the rocket, and the rainstorm fill in a very realistic and effective picture. The mill scene in the second act shows great attention to detail, and the third set represents a charming painted interior of a cottage” (Chicago Tribune, 16 March 1880, page 3).
In 1881, Burcky became associated with another Chicago Theatre; Sprague’s Olympic Theatre on Clark Street, opposite of the Sherman House, featured Burcky’s work. The Inter Ocean reported that “Muldoon’s Trip To Boston” was produced “with entire new scenery by H. E. Burcky, Esq.” (4 April 1881, page 8). At this same time, Burcky’s future partner, Henry C. Tryon, was working at McVicker’s Theatre with C. Louis Malmsha. Both would travel from Chicago to Cincinnati for work on the great festival in 1881. That year, Charles Fox, the distinguished scenic artist of Her Majesty’s Theater, London, superintended the painting of the Great Opera festival (Cincinnati Enquirer, 18 Feb. 1881, page 4). After traveling to New York to procure some artists’ materials for finishing the scenery that could not be found in Cincinnati, the newspaper reported, “He returned yesterday and found that two young artists from Chicago, Messrs. Burcky and Tryon, and Messrs. Rettig and Waugh, of our city, had been progressing rapidly with their work. To-day and to-morrow will see all the scenery painted and in its place. To give an idea of the immensity of the work that has been accomplished by these artists, it is only necessary to state that for one opera alone, Lohengrin, eleven large scenes have been painted, and fully that number, if not more, have been painted for each of the other six operas.”
Cincinnati Opera Festival, 1883
The annual festival in Cincinnati drew theatre artists and crowds from across the country. On April 22, 1883, Chicago’s “Inter Ocean” described the scope of the event, reporting, “Outside of Cincinnati, from lakes to gulf and from ocean to ocean, the whole country seems to be at fever heat in anticipation of this event – that is, if application form the press for courtesies and of excursion parties for hotel accommodations are trustworthy criterions, and they certainly are. All the great papers of the country will be represented by members of the home staff. Hotels are all but overwhelmed with application for rooms, and the railroads will do an immense excursion business during that week. The daily press here has written the matter up industriously, and this week’s Harper’s Weekly has commence picturing it – a work which it has done admirably, as far as it has gone, but which it will supplement next week with some of the principal scenery” (page 5).
A detailed description of the scenic art scene, shows the working environment that encompassed Burcky at this time. The “Inter Ocean” reported, “There are twelve artists working in scene painting alone, with each at least one helper. Not less than fifty carpenters are busy preparing flats and sets and putting up the proscenium and on the properties about thirty men, boys, and girls are employed. All these, with the painters and common laborers, will make a working force of something near one hundred and twenty-five people, working day and night getting ready. What a workshop they have. Horticultural Hall, 75 feet high, 100 feet broad, and with its appendages, 300 feet long, to say nothing of its corridors and its upper stories, all of which are used by the scene painters and property men. The spectacle of all these busy men, visible at one glance from some points of view in Horticultural Hall, makes an impression not to be forgotten. Here at the west end are a throng of busy carpenters huddled together as compactly as consistent with comfort, framing flats and working out furniture. Next beyond them under the glass roof of Horticultural Hall, in a light which on a clear day artists call wild, are the scene painters on their picturesque aerial bridges, painting away for dear life three scenes side by side; and such scenes for size – just think of it – sixty-six feet long and forty-five feet high; The frame work which supports these scenic artists’ swinging stages looks strong enough and complicated enough to serve for railway bridges…some of the best artists of the country are engaged upon them. Dewitt C. Waugh, Thomas R. Weston, Gaspard Maeder, Charles Murray, Joseph Piggot, and Harley Merry are of the number. They enter into the work with enthusiasm and are doing their level best.”
This was the event that really connected Burcky with Tryon, soon both were headed west and associated with the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver, Colorado. In 1884 “H. E. Burcky” was identified as “the artist of the Tabor Grand (Memphis Daily Appeal, 19 Nov. 1884, page 2). This is Henry E. Burcky, sometimes spelled Burckey (Feb 1852 – 21 Feb. 1908), whose career spanned from approximately 1875-1908.
During the 1880s Burcky worked as an itinerant artist, yet primarily advertised in Chicago. Burcky bounced back and for the between Denver and Chicago. Burcky filled dual roles at both the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver and the Olympic Theatre in Chicago.
In 1885, Burcky was involved with the renovation of Chicago’s Olympic Theatre and several upcoming shows at the venue. On August 16, 1885, the “Inter Ocean” published,
“With the conclusion of the engagement of the Wymans this week at the Olympic Theater the house will be closed until Sept. 7, when it will be reopened as the “New Olympic” by the present lessees and managers, and they state that such extensive and important changes in the place will be made as to entitle it to its name. The lobby will be changed to permit the addition of a foyer, with heavy velvet curtains shutting the body of the theatre from the foyer and lobby. In the theater and foyer will be hung twelve crayon pictures 4×7 feet with gaslight effects, arranged by Bressan, the artist. Other pictures and statuary will be added. The floors will be newly carpeted, walls repapered, entire woodwork repainted, and the roof and exits repaired and changed. H. E. Burcky is painting new scenery and a drop curtain, and there will not be a scene, border, or wing used that is not entirely new” (16 Aug. 1885, page 13).
At the Olympic Theatre, Burcky painted scenery for Mortimer & Weaver’s Dramatic Co. production of “The Colleen Bawn” at the Olympic Theatre. Chicago’s “Inter Ocean” reported, “New sets of scenery, showing the Lakes of Killarney, the cave by the seas, and other beautiful bits of scenery incidental to the play have been painted for the occasion by H. E. Burckey, the scenic artist” (9 Aug 1885, page 13). Burckey painted scenery for another Olympic Theatre production that year, Alfred Trumball’s “Custer,” starring William J. Fleming. The production included a series of scenic effects that ranged from shimmering waters to brilliantly lit skies. The “Chicago Tribune” advertised the show as including “realistic stage effects and the great battle scene by H. E. Burcky” (26 July 1885, page 6).
1885 was another significant milestone for Burcky, as well as and many other scenic artists. An event was planned to exhibit and sell distemper works by scenic artists. On August 1 , 1885, the “Inter Ocean” reported, “The scenic artists of this city held a meeting this week at Parker Galleries and determined to hold an exhibition and sale of works in distemper at those galleries early inn September. Among the artists present were: Ernest Albert, John Mazzanovich, Walter Burridge, David A. Strong, John Howard Rogers, Henry Tryon, George Dayton, Thomas Moses, John Howell Wilson, H. C. Burcky, Charles Ritter, and others” (page 4).
On October 12, 1885, there was the first exhibition of Water Colors by American scenic artists from all over the country. John Moran wrote an article about the Scene Painter’s Show for the “Art Union, a Monthly Magazine of Art” (Vol. 2, No. 4, 1885, p. 85):
“The Scene Painters’ Show. Chicago, October 12th, 1885
The first Exhibition of Water Colors by American Scenic Artists has been open free to the public for some weeks past, in this city, and the eighty-four examples hung on the walls of Messrs. Louderback & Co.’s galleries include some praiseworthy and valuable works. Such a collection proves that the broad pictorial treatment requisite for adequate stage effect does not incapacitate a man for the finer and more delicate manipulation essential to good aquarelles, and shows, moreover, a healthy progressive spirit among scenic artists. The name of Matt Morgan has long been gratefully familiar to us, and he is represented by diverse and facile contributions. “Alone in the Forest Shade” (1), shows lumbermen with their load descending a wild ravine flanked on either side by towering pines. The feeling of solitude and gloom is forcibly conveyed and the tree forms and foliage broadly yet carefully handled. “The Lost Comrade” (27), and “Waiting for Death” (14), are strong and weird aspects of prairies life, the former representing a horseman, lasso in hand, who has come upon the skeletons of a horse and rider among the pampas grass, and the latter a bull calf standing over the moribund body of a cow, striving with futile bellow to keep advancing wolves at bay. A nude figure, “The New Slave” (71), standing expectantly against a rich low-toned drapery, is exquisite in drawing and color and charmingly beautiful in suggestion. Mr. Walter Burridge runs the gamut of landscape figure and decoration and is good in all! His “Spring” (9), “Autumn Leaves” (39), and “Old Mill” (49), are deftly washed-in landscapes, true to nature and aerial in quality, while “My Assistant” (16), a study of behind the scenes life, and a “Ninety Minute Sketch” (83), of his friend Mr. Ernest Albert, show character and a nice sense of texture. Mr. Ernest Albert’s “Winter Twilight” (12), is full of sentiment of the season and excellent in composition, and his “October Morning” (31), “moonrise” (40), “Sunset” (79), and “Autumn” (80), are severally individual as transcripts and prove his mastery over the vehicle he uses. “A Decorative Flower Piece” (84), by the same artist, groups of roses, pansies and forget-me-nots in a most artistic and harmonious manner. “Nobody’s Claim, Col.” (65) and “Near Racine, Wis.” (76) By Mr. Thomas G. Moses, are among his best examples and are freely treated and with fidelity to locale character and sky effects. Mr. Albert Operti gives us some reminiscences of his Lapland tour in 1884, which are realistic and worthy, and Mr. J. Hendricks Young, “A Busy Day on Chicago River” (38), which together with the local bits by Mr. Moses, Mr. C. E. Petford and Mr. Burridge, is of historical value as it is skillfully painted. “Rats, you Terrier” (59), by the same hand, is a “snappy” and bright treatment of a dog’s head and fully catches the spirit of the English. Mr. Henry C. Tryon’s “Source of the Au Sable” (34), powerfully conveys a sense of somberness and grandeur, and though ample in detail loses nothing of the vastness and breadth, which such a landscape motion calls for. Other works deserving of notice are Messrs. George Dayton, Sr., George Dayton, Jr., the late L. Malmsha, C. Boettger, Chas. Ritter, H. Buhler and John Howell Wilson, whose “Country Road” (76” is especially fresh, verdurous and bright. It is to be hoped that this is only the forerunner of many like exhibitions and it marks a decided growth in the national art spirit.”
Yesterday, I started exploring the life and career of scenic
artist H. E. Burckey. Remnants of Burckey’s painting still exist at the Tabor
Opera House in Leadville Colorado. In 1890, Burckey painted eight jungle wings
constructed by William J. Moon for the venue. Burckey was a scenic artist who
grew up and entered the theatre industry in Chicago.
By the age of eighteen, Henry E. Burckey was listed as
“scenic artist” in the 1875 Chicago Directory, living at 83 S. Halsted. Little is
published of Burckey’s early career, but in 1879 he was credited as the sole
artist for “Queen’s Evidence,” playing at Hamlin’s Theatre. The show starred
Geo. C. Boniface and advertisements reported, “Every scenic in this play will
be entirely new and painted by Henry Burcky” (Chicago Tribune, 14 Dec. 1879,
page 16). Five months later, Burckey was credited as the scenic artist for a
charity event that included a production of “The Frog Opera.” The “Chicago
Tribune” reported, “This novel
extravaganza, which has recently been given in New York, Philadelphia,
Baltimore and other cities, will be brought out at the Central Music-Hall on Tuesday
and Thursday evening s and Wednesday afternoon this week, for the benefit of
the Nursery and Half-Orphan Asylum. Among the cast and chorus of frogs are some
of the best actors in the Farragut Boat Club. Special scenery, representing the
swamp in the earlier part of the piece, and the old mill in the last act, is
being painted by Burkey, the scenic artist. As its title indicates, the Frog
Opera is purely an extravaganza, and, with considerable continuity of plot, it
describes the wooing on Prince Frog and his experiences with Simple
Simon, Baron Rat, Sir Thomas Cat, Baroness Rat, etc. The costumes are made
after designs by Mark Waterman, the Boston artist, and are said to be unusually
effective” (“Chicago Tribune, 16 May 1880, page 11). His career was on an upward
swing, bringing him into contact with other scenic artists, such as Henry C.
Tryon who worked at McVicker’s Theatre.
By 1881, Burckey partnered with Tryon, and the two ventured
south to paint scenery for the Cincinnati Opera Festival. Their work was very well
received, and their departure even made headlines. The “Cincinnati Enquirer” reported, “Messrs.
Burcky and Tryon, the distinguished artists who painted part of the scenery for
the Opera Festival, are delighted with Cincinnati; say they were never treated
so kindly, and never had so much appreciation shown them. They will probably
leave for Chicago this week” (4 March 1881, page 5). Burckey, like most scenic
artists of his generation, would travel to secure work. This was often in
addition to holding down a seasonal theatre gig.
Western theaters offered wonderful opportunities for artists
young and old alike. Soon, Burckey and Tryon two headed west, making a name for
themselves in Colorado. In 1882, Tryon settled in Denver and was associated
with H. A. W. Tabor’s second theater, the Tabor Opera Grand House. Built only a
few years after the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, the Tabor Grand was a
massive undertaking. By 1884, Burcky was listed as the scenic artist for the
venue. Although Burckey was still listed in Chicago directories throughout the
1880s, he was building a good reputation as quite an accomplished artist. Although
Burcky was now listed as the Tabor Grand’s scenic artist, he continued to paint
for touring productions and other Chicago shows. The train ride from Chicago to
Denver was only a day away, 17 hours and five minutes; a short jaunt with only
one overnight. Similarly, Denver to Salt Lake City was only a fifteen-hour
trip, explaining the ease of Henry C. Tryon working at both the Tabor Grand
Opera House and Salta Lake Theatre during the early 1880s. Rail travel made it
possible for scenic artists to hold dual positions in two different states.
While in Denver during 1884, Burckey painted the State’s exhibit
for the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition. The States of
Colorado constructed a 6,600 square-foot exhibit in the Government & States
building. One of thirty-eight states represented at the exposition, the Colorado
exhibit was located near the north entrance of the building, and included a realistic
representation of the Rocky Mountains, painted by Burckey. As with other exhibits,
Colorado’s agricultural products, ores and minerals were set out on display.
The World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition, 1884-1885The World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition, 1884-1885The Colorado Exhibit at the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition at New Orleans, 1884-1885.Painting by H. E. Burckey for the Colorado Exhibit at the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition at New Orleans, 1884-1885.Painting by H. E. Burckey for the Colorado Exhibit at the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition at New Orleans, 1884-1885.
The “Memphis Daily” credited Burckey with painting “The
Pioneer Car” for the World’s Fair in New Orleans, (Memphis Daily Appeal, 19
Nov. 1884, page 2). The exhibit was described as a “work of art” in the
“Memphis Daily Appeal.” The article described Burckey’s work in detail. Here is
the article in its entirety:
“Upon its sides are some splendid paintings from the brush
of H. E. Burcky, the scenic artist of the Tabor Grand Opera house. These pictures
are well worth careful scrutiny.
Upon one side of the car the picture is emblematic of
Colorado’s beautiful scenery, her resources and the glory of the South, with
New Orleans as the crown of that section. In the center is a large horseshoe,
upon the arch of which is the inscription, “Miner’s Cabin.” Withing the arche,
formed by the emblem of good luck, is the full-length figure of a miner with
pick upon his shoulder, apparently just starting out on a prospecting tramp.
In the right center is a group of two figures, one a farmer
binding a sheaf of wheat, while beside him sits his wife with a dinner-pail and
basket, evidently resting after her noonday walk with her husband’s lunch. From
this scene, the perspective goes back over fertile plains across which a
railroad train is gliding, until the plains heighten to a grand view of the Rocky
Mountains.
Upon the extreme right of the picture is a splendid view of
the Grand Canyon from the mouth of which is approaching a train, the locomotive
tender showing the letters D. & R. G.” At the left of the horseshoe, and
covering about one-third of the side car, is the Southern scene, with idle
darkies lounging around bales of cotton and cut watermelon lying in the
foreground, while away to the left of the scene and in the depth of perspective
is a river with the city of New Orleans in the distance.
Upon the other side of the car, about one-third of the
picture represents a miner’s cabin, with utensils of a prospector’s
housekeeping hanging upon its wall, while sitting a little distance in front is
the miner with extended hands. In his hands he holds a pan, into which his eyes
gaze earnestly for the coveted gold. The remainder of the picture is a sweeping
view of snow-capped mountains.
This car and decorations will be a credit to the artist and
to Colorado which sends it forth, and is safe to predict that no exhibit which
will arrive in the Crescent City will attract more attention before it is
opened to view.
The Miner’s Cabin idea and its careful preparation is highly
creditable to its agent, Mr. T. E. Boynton, and Mr. Noel May, who so ably
assisted in carrying the conception to a reality. Mr. Boynton will accompany
the car to-night and Mr. May will follow in a few days.
The car is loaded with contribution of ores and minerals
from over 100 different mines throughout the State, to be used in the
construction of the “Miners’ and Prospectors’ Cabin,” connected with the
Colorado exhibit at New Orleans. This collection includes many rare and
valuable specimens of bullion-producing mineral. The “Cabin” is intended to be
emphatically a Colorado structure, the mortar used being compressed of a
material presented by the Denver Cement Manufacturing Company, and sand taken
from the bed of Cherry Creek. Other shipments of ore will follow this car, to
be used in keeping the cabin in repair, as well as to constantly ass its
attractions.
The train containing the exhibits from the Denver Exposition
and some other exhibits will follow, leaving Denver about the 20th
instant. The Denver Exposition display is now nearly all packed ready for
shipment. A very valuable addition was made yesterday by the Hon. H. A. W.
Tabor, who will send a splendid cabinet containing the specimens from Robert E.
Lee and the Matchless mine, and valued at $1000.”
Much has been written about the World’s Fair in New Orleans,
but here is a link to the 1885 publication – “Practical Common Sense Guide Book
trough the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition at New Orleans”-
http://archive.org/stream/practicalcommons00perkrich#page/26/mode/2up
Back of a jungle wing noting stage carpenter and scenic artist, dated October 6, 1890.
“W. J. Moon carpenter and H. E. Burpey [sic.] scenic artist, October 6, 1890” is penciled on the back of a jungle wing at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. William J. Moon was a local resident and Henry E. Burkey was a scenic artist who began his career in Chicago. By 1884, “Harry Miner’s Dramatic Directory” listed “Burckey, Tabor Opera, Denver” as the scenic artist for the Tabor Opera House in Leadville; he was working for both venues. Burckey was still working for Tabor five years later. After completing the jungle wings for the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, the “Herald Democrat” reported his departure for Denver on October 16, 1890, noting “Mr. H. E. Burcky left last evening for Denver.”
Yesterday I wrote about stage carpenter and stage manager W.
J. Moon. Today I explore the life and career of
Henry E. Burckey (1852-1908). Burckey was been a bit tricky to track
down, as the spelling of his name greatly varies in newspaper accounts and
historical records. Variations included Burckey, Burkey, Bercky, Berkey, and Burcky;
I am going with Burckey.
Born in 1852, Henry E. Burckey was the son of German
immigrant Frederick Burckey (1813-1902). The 1850 US Federal Census lists that Frederick
Burckey was born in “Frankfurt-Main” and emigrated from Germany in 1830. He
eventually settled with family in Chicago area where he resided until his
passing on October 21, 1902. Frederick was employed as a confectioner until he
opened a restaurant with Augustus Berlin. He later worked as a clerk.
The 1870 census listed that Burckey was living with his
three sons William, Henry and Charles, ages 16, 13 and 7. Between 1870 and 1875, Henry entered the
theatre industry and became a scenic artist.
He entered the scene about the same time that Thomas G. Moses did, about
1873-1874. By 1875 Henry was listed as “scenic artist” in the “Chicago Directory”
living at 83 S. Halsted. Interestingly, Henry’s younger brother Charles followed
him into the painting business and was listed as a “painter” in the 1880
Census. Burckey remained in the directory for the next decade, despite working
for extended periods of time in other regions. At this time Chicago was a major
theatrical hub with equal access to almost all of the country; it was the place
to be during the second half of the nineteenth century. Ever-expanding railways
provided easy routes for the marketing and shipping of both goods and services.
A vast transportation network allowed remote communities access to a variety of
services when constructing a performance venue that included scenic art. Many
scenic artists, such as Burckey and Moses, made the Windy City their home and
constantly traveled to new venues. Even when working for a studio, their lives
remained that of itinerant artists.
By 1880, Henry Burckey, painted an old mill scene for the
“Frog Opera.” The production toured New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore. By
the spring the production played at Chicago’s Central Music Hall (Chicago
Tribune, 16 May 1880 page 11). As Burckey made a name for himself, he began to
partner with other well-known and respected scenic artists, such as Henry C.
Tryon.
In 1880, Tryon was working as a scenic artist at McVicker’s
Theatre, where he came in close contact with Thomas G. Moses, as well as Joseph
Sosman, of Sosman & Landis. Moses joined Sosman & Landis in 1880 as
their first employee, Tryon would follow four years later. There was an abundance
of work for many, and the fortunate few secured permanent positions in popular
theaters and opera houses.
By 1881, “H. E. Burcky” was listed as scenic artist at Hooley’s
Theatre in Chicago. At this same time Burckey partnered with Tryon to provided
scenery for Cincinnati’s Opera Festival. They worked alongside some other very
respected gentlemen, including Fox, Magnani, Humphreys, Hughes, and Rettig
& Waugh. An article in the “Cincinnati Enquirer,” reported, “Messrs. H. E.
Burcky and Henry Tynor [sic.], the young and talented artists who came here
from Chicago to assist painting the scenery, have been doing excellent work.
They are bright, intelligent and rapid worker and but for their assistance it
would have been difficult to have the scenery ready by Monday next. Mr. Burcky
is scenic artist at Hooley’s Theater in Chicago, and Mr. Tryon at McVickers.
They express themselves as amazed at the extent and magnitude of the affair”
(“Cincinnati Enquirer,” 15 Feb 1881, page 4).” Burckey and Tryon were applauded
for one “Magic Flute” setting, heralded as a “Beautifully painted scene.” The “Cincinnati
Daily Enquirer” article described the painting; “…massive rocks in the
foreground appear so real as almost to deceive the eye. Rich masses of dark foliage relieve their
barrenness while their golden-yellow color is projected boldly from the deep
blue sky. Two transformation tableaux
occur in this scene, the first the ordeal, by fire, remarkable for its
brilliancy and warmth of color; the second, the ordeal by water, for its cool and
delicious coloring, complete contraries delightfully portrayed” (23 February
1881, page 4).
The opera festival was not only a game changer for each
artist, but an incentive to travel westward. By the fall of 1882, Tryon had
left Chicago and was working in Denver, Colorado, for Horace Tabor. Even when
Tabor traveled to Salt Lake City for work, newspapers listed the artist as “Mr.
Henry C. Tryon, of the Tabor Grand Opera House” (“Ogden Standard,” 30 Sept,
1882, page 3). Two years later, Burckey became
known as “H. E. Burckey, the artist of the Tabor Grand” (“Memphis Daily
Appeal,” 19 Nov. 1884, page 2). It remains unclear if they worked together on
scenery at the Tabor Grand between 1882 and 1884.
An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.Jungle wings by Henry E. Burckey stacked against the upstage wall at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.An example of Henry E. Burckey’s scenic art.
Regardless, Burckey became the sole scenic artist at the
Tabor opera house by 1884, the same years that Tryon returned to Chicago to
work for Sosman & Landis. In 1884, Moses wrote, “Henry C. Tryon came to the
studio to work. He enthused Young and I
more than anyone ever had. He was a
pupil of Thos. Moran and James and William Hart and was very clever, but
awfully eccentric.” Tryon also joined Moses and John H. Young on a sketching
trip to West Virginia in 1885. I will expand Tryon’s story in the next few
weeks.
Between 1880 and 1884, Tryon submitted a series of articles about the scenic art profession in papers across the country. On Dec. 19, 1880, the “Chicago Tribune” published “ Scene Painting: Some hints to the Public Regarding a Special Department of the Painters’ Art Not Well Understood” by Henry C. Tryon (page 19). Here is the link to the article as I included it today as part of my “Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar” storyline (part 1087): https://drypigment.net2020/10/11/tales-from-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-part-1087-henry-c-tryon-scene-painting-some-hints-to-the-public-regarding-a-special-department-of-the-painters-art-not-well-understood/