Scottish Rite Scenery – Page 10

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 723 – Kansas City Scottish Rite, 1904, 1906 and 1909

Part 723: Kansas City Scottish Rite, 1904, 1906 and 1909

In 1909, Sosman & Landis provided a second set of scenery for the Scottish Rite in Kansas City, Kansas. The history of the Kansas City Scottish Rite is a little confusing. There were two Kansas City Scottish Rites, one in Kansas and one in Missouri. This makes it difficult when tracking down information about either one, as the same newspapers often published information without specifying the state.

In 1904, Sosman & Landis delivered a first set of scenery to the Kansa City, Kansas, Scottish Rite (see past post 692). This was the same year that the company also produced Scottish Rite scenery for Fort Scott, Kansas. The first Kansas City, Kansas, Scottish Rite was designed by architect W. W. Rose, and located at the corner of 7^th and Ann Street. On April 1, 1904, The Lincoln Journal included an article on the new building, however a description of the stage area and scenery was absent. It was intentionally concealed from the public for the event, closed off with a curtain. The article only noted that the stage was “thirty-two feet deep and thirty seven feet to the gridiron and has a full equipment of scenery and appointments including a switchboard, which controls every light in the room from the stage.” Unfortunately, the stage, auditorium and building all went up in flames only two years later.

During October 1906, the three-story building caught fire during a street fair. The Iola Daily Record reported that the Masonic Temple, its entire contents, two residences adjoining the block, and half of the booths at the street fair were destroyed by fire (October 20, 1906, page 1). The cause of the fire was the explosion of a gasoline stove in the booth occupied by the ladies of the Central Christian Church. The flames spread rapidly throughout the booths, and the Masonic Temple was the first building to suffer damage on the corner of Seventh Street and Ann Avenue. All efforts to save the structure proved futile. Among the losses were Scottish Rite paraphernalia and stage settings, valued at $50,000; their insurance only covered $16,000 of the loss (Kansas City Gazette. 27 Oct. 1906, page 1). Other newspapers reported the loss paraphernalia, furniture, fixtures and stage scenery, was valued $20,000 and only insured for $6,500 (Kansas City Gazette. 27 Oct 1909, page 1). Many other Masonic bodies in the building also lost uniforms, regalia, ritual and records, including Wyandotte Lodge No. 3, the oldest Masonic lodge in Kansas.

On October 27, 1906, the Kansas City Gazette reported “The Masons Will Rebuild.” The article quoted R. J. McFarland, general secretary of the Scottish Rite, who said, “We have definitely decided on a magnificent building to be erected on our property at Seventh and Ann at a cost of $10,000. As we depend entirely on our members it must be through them that we raise the amount necessary. We will hold a meeting Wednesday evening of all Scottish Rite bodies to discuss various plans regarding funding.” Grand Commander James D. Richardson and grand secretary Frederick W. Webber, or Washington, D.C. were in attendance at the meeting.

The Scottish Rite bodies approved plans for the new Masonic Temple on June 5, 1907. Again W. W. Rose designed the new four-story structure that included a sixty-foot frontage on Seventh street and a depth of 136 feet on Ann Avenue. The exterior of the building was noted as a mixture of “Hebrew and Arabic,” with the roof being supported by “Moorish pillars” (The Weekly News, 7 June 1907, page 1). The auditorium and stage were located on the second, third and fourth floors, with the fly loft rising to the roof. The large space included a forty-foot stage and balcony with a seating capacity of 800.

Description of the new Scottish Rite Building i Kansas City, Kansas, 1909.

The Kansas City, Kansas, Scottish Rite building, 1909.

Aerial view of the Kansas City, Kansas, Scottish Rite building.

Detail of fly loft in an aerial view of the Kansas City, Kansas, Scottish Rite building.

In 1909, the new Scottish Rite building was dedicated in Kansas City, Kansas. The Kansas City Times reported, “The Scottish Rite Temple in Kansas City, Kas., which cost $100,000, will be dedicated at 8 o’clock tonight. The ceremony will be performed by James D. Richardson, sovereign grand commander of the Scottish Rite Masonic bodies in the United States. This ceremony will close the twenty-third semi-annual reunion of the Rite in Kansas City, Kas. A class of 150 persons have taken degrees from the fourth to the thirty-second at this reunion” (19 Nov 1909, page 12). The Fall Reunion was the twenty-third for the Valley of Kansas, Orient of Kansas. On the first day of the reunion, Thomas Wentworth Harrison of Topeka, SGIG in Kansas was in attendance (Kansas City Times 18 Nov. 1909, page 1). On the second day of the reunion, the degrees of Victory Chapter Rose Croix were conferred on a class of seventy-five candidates. In the third day, the degrees from nineteen to thirty inclusive in John H. Brown Council Knight Kadosh were conferred to the candidates.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 722 – The Palette & Chisel Club Camp at Fox Lake, 1909

Part 722: The Palette & Chisel Club Camp at Fox Lake, 1909

Like theatrical managers, scenic artists also sought to escape the tranquility of the country, escaping the hard work of the studio and the noise of the city. Thomas G. Moses wrote of summer sketching trips to Fox Lake, Illinois, throughout the early twentieth century, especially in 1909.

In 1905 the Palette & Chisel Club at the Chicago Society of Artists formed an artistic community along in Fox Lake. The club was founded in 1895 and consisted of a variety of artists and craftsmen for the purpose of work and study. The members were “all wage-workers, busy during the week with pencil, brush or chisel, doing work to please other people” (Inland Printer, 1896). On Sunday mornings, they gathered for five hours to paint just for themselves.

Fox Lake provided haven far away from the hustle and bustle of Chicago. Many Sosman & Landis artists journeyed to Fox Lake whenever they could escape the studio for a few days, including Moses. In the beginning, the site was quite rustic with tents and cots. In 1906, one year after the group formed the camp, Moses joined the Palette and Chisel Club. At the time, the group consisted of approximately sixty local painters, illustrators, and sculptors. Of Moses’s first trip to their seasonal camp, he wrote, “June 1^st, I made my first trip to the Palette and Chisel Club camp at Fox Lake, Ill. Helped to put up the tent. A new experience for me, but I enjoyed it. I slept well on a cot. Made a few sketches. A very interesting place. I don’t like the cooking in the tent and there should be a floor in the tent. I saw a great many improvements that could be made in the outfit and I started something very soon.”

The Palette & Chisel Club camp tent at Fox Lake. Photograph taken by Stuart Fullerton.

The portable house purchased by Thomas G. Moses for the Palette & Chisel Club camp.

By 1908, Moses wrote, “I bought the portable house that we built years ago and at that time we received $300.00 for it. I finally got it for $50.00, some bargain. It cost $25.00 to remove it and we will put it up at Fox Lake in the Spring.” The house had been used in Forest Park that summer to show the attraction, “The Day in the Alps.”

The next summer, Moses wrote, “As we had put up the portable house in Fox Lake, I was better contented to go up. I gave the camp a portable kitchen and it was some class. I felt sure I would manage to get a camp outfit worth while and the boys all fell in line with me.” In 1909, he also wrote, “I also enjoyed sketching at the Lake. That is one thing I don’t think I could ever get enough of. But our business has to be taken care of before too much pleasure.”

There were two significant events over the course of the last five years that placed Fox Lake in more of a personal context for me. The first occurred in Minnesota, and the second occurred in Maui. In 2014, I discovered a map to Fox Lake drawn on the backside of a Scottish Rite drop destined for Winona, Minnesota, in 1909. This was the same year that Moses wrote, ““As we had put up the portable house in Fox Lake, I was better contented to go up.” Located near the top batten on the stage right side, I discovered the pencil sketch while placing the Winona scenery collection into temporary storage for the City of Winona. The backdrop was later sold in an online auction with many others from the scenery collection. It is now somewhere in storage at the Des Moines Scottish Rite, likely not to be seen for years.

Map on the back of Fox Lake drawn in the back of a scene painted for the Scottish Rite in Winona, Minnesota, 1909

The second event occurred in 2017. That fall, three very small paintings by Thomas G. Moses came into my possession from Moses. One of his great grandchildren sold these and a few others to me. Our friendship began, after he responded to a 1996 letter that I sent out in 2016. Three of the paintings from his collection were of the same size and vintage, with one titled “Fox Lake, 1909.” The other two depicted a distant lake and the Palette & Chisel Club’s portable house at Fox Lake. These three scenes painted on hardboard had remained with the family for decades; they meant something special to Moses.

Painting of the Fox Lake cabin of the Palette & Chisel Club camp by Thomas G. Moses, 1909

A view of Fix Lake painted by Thomas G. Moses, 1909

It was Moses’ view of Fox Lake that prompted my entire journey to the Hawaiian Islands.

They each remain a lovely reminder to me – take time for yourself. We all need to enjoy some form of scenic retreat, a respite from the daily grind. That is one of the reasons that I decided to start offering Scenic Art Retreats last year, hosted by Historic Stage Services. They are held at a stagecoach stop along a picturesque river in central Minnesota. Here is the link: http://www.historicstageservices.com/training.html

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar – The Boston Scottish Rite’s LED Wall

The Boston Scottish Rite primarily uses an LED wall for the degree production backings. I had the opportunity to examine the effect on April 12 before my afternoon flight. My host went out of his way to take time from his full schedule to share both the building and his work.

LED wall at the Boston Scottish Rite next to a historic dye drop

The Boston Scottish Rite has only a few historic backdrops, ranging from the early to mid-twentieth century. The later versions are fairly crude traditions of standard themes, done in brilliant dye work. It really is an odd mix of painted elements. The theatre is located on the seventh floor of a building with architecture that is reminiscent of many Northern Masonic Jurisdiction Scottish Rite theaters, Gothic in feel.

The Boston Scottish Rite stage and LED wall.

I was anxious to see how well an LED wall worked in a historic venue. There can be many short-term benefits to embracing digital scenery before the system becomes obsolete and/or irreparable. Scene changes require no stage crew and the subject matter is limitless, with endless possibilities for backings during degree productions.

However, I recognized that the use of digital images in lieu of historic scenery could result in an overall loss of scenic illusion on the stage. Until I saw the LED wall in Boston, I was unsure as to the extent. There is increased realism for the backing and more flexibility of subject matter, but there is something missing from the stage aesthetic. It is as if the soul of the stage has disappeared, with the space being transformed into something entirely different.

There are a few things to consider when contemplating a switch from traditional painted scenery to digital imagery for Scottish Rite degree productions.

LED walls are fantastic for many things, but the technology is racing so fast that they become obsolete in a relatively short period of time. This nuance of technology is frequently not fully understood by those purchasing a new system. Often the Masonic clients have lived with their historic scenery and stage machinery for decades, and they expect a new system to last just as long. This is especially pertinent if a substantial amount of money is being spent on an entirely new system.

A parallel could be made with much older adults who consider the purchase of a computer as an investment, not a short-term appliance that will soon have to be replaced as technology continues to advance. The same can be said with motorized line sets, lighting systems, and any other digital systems; at some point they will need to be replaced as they will not last for an extended period of time. Many modern components for the stage with computer systems and software cannot last for decades, as technology races forward, thus making replacement parts often unavailable when the need for a repair occurs a few years down the road. At some point the technology will need to be repaired or replaced. As we experience with many other appliances in our home, it may not be possible to get the necessary replacement parts if our specific the model is no longer being produced as better versions are available. Does the client realize that their new technology has a proverbial shelf life and that the entire system will soon need to be replaced?

Regardless of the ease of use, or anticipated life expectancy of an LED wall, its mere presence is incongruous with the visual aesthetic established by historic costumes and properties. What made the traditional painted illusion so successful was that the selection of scenery, props and costumes where selected as a part of a unified visual whole; one intended to be illuminated in a very specific way. To overcome the brilliancy of the LED screen as a backing, I would be curious to see how bright the front light needs to be during degree productions.

A few digital images that the Boston Scottish is using for their LED wall is identical to that used by the Fort Worth Scottish Rite. The photographs originated from a scenery collection produced by Don Carlos Du Bois, representing the Great Western Stage Equipment Co. of Kansas City. The stage compositions are vibrant and very characteristic of the mid-twentieth century. As projections, there is a tendency for fading and a loss of detail. I again noticed this on the USITT Expo floor when looking at a rear projections screen placed next an actual backdrop. The dark areas weren’t as dark as they needed to be. There is a lack of overall contrast, and everything seems to be a just little too light. At the time, I considered how well a rear projection screen would work for degree productions, with performers being placed in front of so much light.

Now the digital images of historic backdrops on an LED wall are even brighter. The spacing between individual LED lights is based on the viewing distance. Just as scenic art painting techniques fall apart as the viewer nears the backdrop, so do individual LED lights that relay the overall image; the farther away the audience is, the greater spacing between the lights. This is why they work so great for rock concerts in auditoriums that seat thousands of people. At the Boston Scottish Rite, the LED wall reads best from the back row of the auditorium, not from the first few rows. It is almost too much technology for the relatively intimate space as you near the stage, let alone step onto the stage.

Now, let’s consider the overall experience of degree participants, after all, that is a major consideration when altering degree work practices. An LED wall creates an entirely different environment for the stage performer. Stepping onto stage in the midst of a fully lit historic scene is magical. You are encompassed by brilliant color and detail, becoming part of the scenic illusion. In the short time that I stood next to the LED wall in Boston, my eyes hurt. The brilliancy for the screen overpowered the entire stage and was very distracting.

A scene on the LED wall at the Boston Scottish Rite

The same can be said for the audience experience as you are watching degree work in front of an LED wall. There is a distinct light spill from the image on the screen and I would be curious to see how much front light on the performers is necessary. Just as dimly lit stages cause visual fatigue for the audience, so do brilliantly lit compositions, especially if you are ten feet way.

I am curious to see how long this system will last in Boston and hear about the Scottish Rite degree participants’ experiences.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 718 – The Scottish Rite in Memphis, Tennessee, 1909

Part 718: The Scottish Rite in Memphis, Tennessee, 1909

In 1909, Thomas G. Moses recorded that Sosman & Landis produced a scenery collection for the Scottish Rite in Memphis, Tennessee. The scenery is stunning, and some of the best that the studio produced during this period.

The first reunion in the Memphis Scottish Rite building was held from November 15-19, 1909. The “Dedicatory Class” purchased a grandfather clock as a commemorative gift for the building; it is still in use today. I learned about the clock while watching a 41-minute video posted to YouTube by the Memphis Scottish Rite. There have been 7,249 views and it certainly depicts local character.

The YouTube video is a pleasant peak inside the building and includes interviews with General Secretary, Glen Pitts; Director of the Work, Jerry Hanson; Organist, Mark Henderson; and Personal Representative, Joe Harrison. The credits note the producer that the producer is Gerald Leek and the host is James McCraw. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNm6G2OsDNA

Unfortunately, the host of the video incorrectly credited the scenery production to local students. Specifically, he explained, “a lot of art students came in and painted every single one of the 128 backdrops.” This is not unusual, as when I visited the Salina Scottish Rite, those in charge suggested a similar scenario, except the students came from a fine art college in the east. In many cases, the manufacture of Scottish Rite scenery is attributed to a group of wunderkind, and not experienced scenic artists associated with a scenic studio, such as Sosman & Landis.

Later, while standing in the Memphis Scottish Rite library, our host explains that he is the Masonic historian for the Valley. This bit of information caused my ears to perk up and reconsider his comments about the history of the scenery. Now, it is obvious that this is a well-meaning individual; one who is really trying to do his best to preserve and share Masonic history. However, this entire scenario is more common than one might think, and once again I contemplate my response.

Do I say anything at all? It is seldom beneficial for me to contact a Valley and explain that their perceived history about the stage and scenery is not reflective of the actual facts. Fortunately, over the years I have fine-tuned my approach, starting most conversations with, “That’s very interesting, however, I have some additional information that might help you tell your story…”

In 1980, Dr. John Rothgeb from the University of Texas (Austin) mailed a letter to the Memphis Scottish Rite, General Secretary G. E. Rothrock, inquiring about the scenery. Rothrock responded, “In searching back thru the minutes of these Bodies, I find that the scenery was purchased from M. C. Lilley, who in 1909 was located in Columbus, Ohio.” That means, M.C. Lilley subcontracted the work to Sosman & Landis. Rothrock further noted that the present building was contracted in 1906 and the scenery was purchased in 1909, adding, “There was a controversy and a lot of correspondence was exchanged between the supplier and the Memphis Bodies.” Previously in the letter, Rothrock explained that only the minutes of the Board Meeting pertaining to the purchase of the scenery were left and that all other correspondence had been “destroyed.” There was no note as to when, or how, the records were destroyed. Fire? So, between 1980 and today knowledge pertaining to the purchase of scenery from M. C. Lilley & Co. was replaced with the scenery being painted by local students.

At what point was the actual history lost? How does the delivery of scenery from a major scenic supplier become attributed to local students? If this major piece of information is wrong, what other aspects of Memphis’ Scottish Rite history have been forgotten?

My research suggests that Scottish Rite history in many Valleys began to disappear after WWII. It started with the elimination of paid Scottish Rite historians and archivists, as the jobs were no longer perceived as necessary or valuable. In addition to the elimination to many of the stewards of Scottish Rite history, the purchase of new acquisitions ceases. Simultaneously, the careful inventory of Masonic libraries and museums are suspended in many areas. Why?

Then consider that as Scottish Rite bodies begin to leave their historic building, the institutional knowledge is lost and discredited, sometimes actively erased. I wonder if the intentional burying of history and cultural significance of artifacts had anything to do with justifying the move? This is still happening across the country today as historic buildings are sold and the membership liquidates the contents of their buildings.

I repeatedly read about Valleys citing declining membership and funds as the sole reasons for the move. What is almost never addressed, however, are the intentions for the future, especially that of their material culture and artifacts. If there is no perceived value, legacy or history attached to the artifacts, it makes their abandonment easier.

It will be easy to walk away from a bunch of backings created by student and harder to walk away from large-scale artworks created by nationally recognized fine artists.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 714 – The State of Scottish Rite Scenery at Sosman & Landis in 1909

Part 714: The State of Scottish Rite Scenery at Sosman & Landis in 1909

I return to the entries in Thomas Moses’ typed manuscript during the 1909. Over the course of the past three-month, almost 100 posts, I have rambled down side roads that provided insight into historical scenic art, stage lighting, counterweight systems, and the evolution of Masonic scenery. For quite a while, I focused on theatre installations secured by E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co. of Chicago and M. C. Lilley & Co. of Columbus, and subcontracted to Sosman & Landis under the guidance of Bestor G. Brown. I am trying to tie up loose ends that uncover interesting historical tidbits that never quite made it into the theatre history textbooks.

Moses returns to the Sosman & Landis main studio at the beginning of 1909, as he had been traveling quite extensively throughout all of 1908, although one could say this has remained his standard mode of operation since starting with the company in 1880. Moses explained the cause for his return to the main studio instead of the annex studio, writing, “Sosman seemed to think I was needed there more than at 20^th Street. Pausback took charge of the 20^th Street studio.”

Business was booming, and Sosman & Landis increased their forces. Of staffing at the two studios, Moses wrote, “We have quite a force now at Clinton Street. We have forty-eight on the payroll, which includes the sewing girls and foremen. At 20^th Street we have an average of twelve. I think we should turn out some work and we do. It is often a puzzle to me where it all goes, but the Masonic work requires a lot of time, and there is an average of eighty drops in each order so it makes plenty of work and is very interesting. The artists never grumble when they get it to do.”

Up to 1909, Sosman & Landis had delivered at least twenty-six Scottish Rite collections. In some cases more than one collection was delivered to the same location in less than a decade. The ones that I have verified include:

Chicago, Illinois (first, second and third installations)

Little Rock, Arkansas (first, second and third installations)

Oakland, California

Wichita, Kansas (first and second installations)

Guthrie, Oklahoma

Fargo, North Dakota

Salina, Kansas (first and second installations)

McAlester, Oklahoma (first and second installations)

Portland, Oregon

Duluth, Minnesota

Fort Scott, Kansas

Topeka, Kansas

Detroit. Michigan

San Francisco, California (first and second installations)

Fort Wayne, Indiana

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dubuque, Iowa

Yankton, South Dakota

Clarksburg, West Virginia

Wheeling, West Virginia

In 1909, I have verified that Sosman & Landis produced five Scottish Rite scenery collections: Dallas, TX, San Francisco, CA (second collection), Cleveland, OH, Kanas City, MO, Atlanta, GA, and Winona, MN. Even using Moses’ 1909 formula that Masonic installations averaged 80 drops per order, this would be 400 Masonic drops over the course of 365 days, not including the flats and other properties that would accompany the scenery collections.

According to scenic artist John Hanny who began with the studio in 1906, Masonic work only made up 24-30% of the studio’s entire output. This was also during the same time that Sosman & Landis had started creating scenery for the Ringling Brothers’ grand spectacles too.

We can therefore conservatively estimate that Sosman & Landis artists produced approximately 1200 drops during 1909. The output could have been more, but this likely means that the studio was producing approximately four drops every day of the week. Fortunately, they had a staff of forty-eight on payroll in the main studio and twelve in the annex to help with demand.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 709 – “Installation Shall be Under the Direction of Bestor G. Brown”

Part 709: “Installation Shall be Under the Direction of Bestor G. Brown”

By 1910, the process of manufacturing and installing Scottish Rite scenery collections operated by Brown’s special system was running like a well-oiled machine. M. C. Lilley & Co. landed the work and subcontracted the scenery, stage machinery and lighting portion to Sosman & Landis. M. C. Lilley & Co. provided the costumes, regalia and other necessary paraphernalia.

Up to this point, I have discussed the scenery produced for Little Rock, Oakland, Wichita, Guthrie, Fargo, Salina, Portland and others at the turn of the twentieth century. Let’s jump ahead a decade at the peak production of Scottish Rite scenery in the Sosman & Landis studio, 1909-1910. During that two-year period, Sosman & Landis produced scenery and stage machinery for Kansas City, Kansas; Winona, Minnesota; Dallas, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Memphis, Tennessee; Guthrie, Oklahoma (second installation); St. Paul, Minnesota; Denver, Co; and Indianapolis, Indiana. Keep in mind that at this time the studio also refurbished the Wichita scenery from 1898 and delivered it to Yankton, South Dakota. There are other collections from this period that remain unidentified at this time.

I have also looked in detail at the promotion of Brown’s special system, a method of counterweighting the scenery, that was marketed by well known Mason, Bestor G. Brown. For Masonic context, Brown was a Past Grand Mater of the Grand Lodge of Kansas (1903) and a member of numerous Masonic orders, including the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in both the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction. Brown also belonged to the Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias and Improved Order of Redmen. His profession was that of western sales manager for M. C. Lilley & Co., a supplier of fraternal, military and band goods. He was also considered the only Masonic Stage carpenter in the United States.

There is an interesting section in the 1910 contract between M. C. Lilley & Co., represented by Brown, and the Guthrie Scottish Rite:

“The installation shall be under the direction of Bestor G. Brown who will take charge of and handle the stage during the first reunion, without compensation or expense of any kind, provided of course, sickness or other preventing circumstances shall not operate and abridgement of any in terms of this contract or the pecuniary liability expressed therein.”

This is big, and I doubt that this is an unusual occurrence. It also explains why Brown was considered the Masonic stage carpenter, ruler of the realm behind the footlights. This single sentence in the contract places Brown on site during the first Scottish Rite Reunion that uses the new stage machinery and scenery. It means that at the completion of each Scottish Rite project there is an individual on site to supervise the initial operation of the system, keeping an eye on Masonic stagehands that are unfamiliar with the backstage aspects of a theatrical production.

There are two significant things to consider:

First of all, after most Sosman & Landis theater installations, the company representative superintending the site work remained on site as the theater opened, or at least operated the system to familiarize the client with the new products. In fact, Sosman & Landis had several employees who traveled from location, to location, installing scenery and stage machinery. The supervisor of each installation worked with a crew of carpenters and then operated the system for the client upon completion. Often after an installation – the superintendent of the work would show how everything worked upon completion. In 1887, newspapers reported that Sosman & Landis would, “complete everything, ready for the rise of the curtain, and will run the stage for the first performance.”

We also know that certain that at least one Sosman & Landis stage carpenter traveled without drawings. In the case of Charles S. King and the Crump Theatre project during the late nineteenth century, he was the only individual who was personally held the knowledge pertaining to the carpentry work and installation of the stage machinery and scenery. to install the stage systems. This was a smart move and may have prevented information from being shared with Sosman & Landis’ competitors, keeping new innovations safeguarded, just as guilds protected trade secrets. The knowledge of a new method for installing counterweight systems placed Sosman & Landis ahead of their competitors to deliver more scenery, as Brown’s special system placed the rigging lines close together.

As the scenery and stage machinery were subcontracted Sosman & Landis, it also makes sense that Brown would be on site, representing M. C. Lilley & Co. and directly communicating with the client. After all, the one installing the scenery may not be a Mason or hold that necessary “charm” when the client became a challenge. Also, keep in mind that it was M. C. Lilley & Co. who directly contracted the entire theatre portion of the project with each Scottish Rite.

The second article of note in this clause is that Brown would “take charge of and handle the stage during the first reunion.” He had to, especially if the Sosman & Landis stage carpenter was not a Mason. Fortunately for M. C. Lilley & Co. Brown was a Scottish Rite member in the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction, as well as a fraternal salesman. An active Scottish Rite Mason had to be the onsite eyes during that first reunion; and that was Brown, ensuring that everything operated as promised.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar: “The Santa Fe Scottish Rite Temple: Freemasonry, Architecture and Theatre” Wins the 2019 Ralph Emerson Twitchell Award

I met Jo Whaley in 2014 when she contacted me about the Scottish Rite scenery collection in Santa Fe; the building was being placed on the market for sale. Jo, who understood the significance of the 1912 building and the historic theatre, had decided to document the space before it passed to another owner. The building was sold, but the Santa Fe Scottish Rite managed to get it back. That is a story in itself.

Our initial encountered and discussions morphed in a book by 2015. From 2015 to 2018 Jo and I spent countless hours on the phone, working on the design, text, images, and basic correspondence. We were fortunate to have two other contributors, State Historian Rick Hendricks and the International Folk Art Museum Director Khristaan Villela. Most importantly the Santa Fe Scottish Rite gave us full control over the books contents. We are very grateful to Wes Thorton, Deputy of the Supreme Council, and Dan Ilrich, President of the Scottish Rite Building Foundation, for trusting us to tell their story.

Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Wes Thorton at the 2019 Awards banquet

Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Dan Ilrich at the 2019 Awards ceremony.

Although it was an incredible amount of work, Jo and I became close friends, as we creatively fueled one another throughout the entire process.

The book, however, is just the beginning. It has led to other opportunities that will allow Jo and I to work together again. I am delighted about this aspect as I look forward. Part of it is that we see and approach things in a similar way. Jo worked as a scenic artist before turning to photography, so we have the same appreciation for historic scenery, as well as picturesque landscapes, and our shared history.

2019 New Mexico History Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Last night we had the pleasure of accepting the 2109 Ralph Emerson Twitchell Award from the New Mexico Historical Society. This award is given annually by the Historical Society of New Mexico for an outstanding publication or significant contribution to the creative arts, as related to New Mexico history. An email confirming our award described our book as “absolutely amazing,” and explained, “your book does a wonderful job of presenting the accumulated knowledge of New Mexico’s pioneering Masons, as well as the story behind the building’s unique architecture and its rich theatrical legacy.” The award was presented at the Awards Banquet in Albuquerque as part of the 2019 New Mexico History Conference. Jo and I were invited to attend this event that included a book signing.

The 2019 Ralph Emerson Twitchell Award (front)

The 2019 Ralph Emerson Twitchell Award (back)

The entire project has been about the journey. Working with Jo and the other participants has been such a wonderful experience, but it hasn’t end with the publication of the our book. I can’t wait to see where the road leads us now.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Louisville Scottish Rite, March 20, 2019

On occasion, there were USITT sessions where members visited a Scottish Rite during the conference. The last was in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Lance Brockman and I spoke at the local Scottish Rite – the Humphrey Center. Planning the event was a less than a pleasant experience, and I have been hesitant to propose an off-site session again. That being said, whenever I am attending USITT, I look for a nearby Scottish Rite. It provides me with an opportunity to document just one more collection.

This year, I had multiple requests from colleagues who were attending USITT to visit while I was documenting the Scottish Rite scenery. I always have to check once on site that the Scottish Rite is okay with the extra people showing up during the documentation, but I never mind the company.

Some of the Scottish Rite stage crew who helped during the documentation at the Louisville Scottish Rite.

My only day to photograph the scenery was Wednesday, as there was a Scottish Rite Reunion starting on Thursday. The other logistical parameter for Wednesday was trying to finish up in time to attend the Scene Design Commission meeting. I had from 9AM to 3PM to document as much as possible and make my way back to the convention center. I knew that it would not be enough time to get everything and double-check the inventory. In short, to have people come around and chat really prohibits my ability to rapidly document scenes. However, I also don’t want people to miss the opportunity to see the collection, especially when they have asked in advance.

A group of colleagues from Cobalt visiting the Scottish Rite in Louisville, Kentucky.

Having fun with painted illusion at the Louisville Scottish Rite.

There were a few fortuitous moments on Wednesday that just made the day. The first was meeting Richard Bryant for coffee before heading over to the Scottish Rite. Richard decided to join me for a little bit, as the building was quite close to the convention center. The Masonic stagehands greeted us with donuts and a short visit. So much for my gluten-free diet, as I have no will power against a chocolate donut. Over the course of the morning, Richard did some interviews with his Archiving Technical Theatre Podcast, then ran the light board for one scene so I could capture the painting under different lighting situations. His interviews with the local Masons were such a good idea! This is something that I should have been doing for the past three decades. Richard’s podcast comes out today.

Richard Bryant interviewing a Scottish Rite Mason in Louisville, Kentucky.

Gradually, a series of students and colleagues joined me for a short while and then headed back to the conference. It is always wonderful to listen to their observations about the painting, as I always learn something new. Midway through my project, the Scottish Rite held a small pizza party for our lunch break. It was a wonderful opportunity to chat with the Masons who showed up to help work the lines. Again, so much for being gluten free.

I returned to the convention center for the Scene Design Commission meeting, as I am the VC for Heritage. After the standard introduction, we all broke into our respective sessions to plan for next year. There were only two of us in the Heritage group, Rick and I. The point of the commission meeting is to come up with topics for USITT 2020; these ideas are now filed online with the deadline being June 1. The sessions for next year have been reduced from 1 hour 15 minutes to 45 minutes, with the option for double sessions slots. I am conflicted and a little concerned about the lack of interest in heritage, the reduction of session time, and our industry’s future plans. In hindsight, as I sat with Rick and came up with several session ideas for next year, I realized that this all could have been done over a drink in a bar.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Arriving in Louisville, March 19, 2019

I left Genoa, Illinois, at 5:45 AM on Tuesday, March 19. My goal was to arrive at the Louisville Scottish Rite between noon and 1PM. The drive was pretty uneventful, but there were many places that I wished I had stopped along the way; there is just never enough time. The first was the exit that would have brought me to Thomas G. Moses’ hometown of Sterling, Illinois. The second was the Crump Theatre in Columbus, Indiana. I could not take the time to stop, as I knew that my time was really limited at the Louisville Scottish Rite. My plan was to evaluate the entire collection on Wednesday. Today was simply scoping out the collection, rigging and facility with Rick. Also, this was the only day Rick could visit since the “New World Rigging Symposium” would prevent him from visiting Wednesday.

I contacted my Scottish Rite host Randolph. The intent was to visit for two hours while they were still open. Randolph had scheduled one of the Masonic stagehands to be there – Jim. Jim had worked the stage for many years and was an absolute wealth of information at 75 years old. Fortunately for me, Jim gave me their stage book that provided a little guidance in terms of inventory and line order. This is an unusual gesture, as I often have to prove how much I know before that stage book is passed along.

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system

My visit on Tuesday was primarily about the rigging and Rick’s findings. Rick had a wonderful opportunity to fully explain the significance of this double purchase system to the stewards of this stage. He described that the 1930 system, original to the building, predated the Clancy patent several years later. As interested as I was in the unique aspects of the system I was more anxious to see a few scenes while he was in the flies. They brought in the first line and I began to catalogue information about this 4^th degree interior setting.

My notes were placed within the historical context of the Louisville Scottish Rite that I have explored during the previous week. It was apparent that the majority of the scenery dated from 1910. Toomey & Volland business records noted two scenery deliveries – 1910 and 1951. The drops depicted standard designs and painting techniques characteristic of the studio.

Unfortunately, much of the scenery was restored at one point, with methods that may not be advantageous for the collection’s future. I understand the choices of those who repaired the scene, but wonder how these will age. Most scenes were backed with a type of gauze that appeared plastic, although it may have been the adhesive. The edges of cut scenes were backed with flexible foam core; this I had encountered in Cheyenne. For a new scene, ephemeral in nature, it is a brilliant idea. For historic scenery, I have to wonder how the foam will interact with the fragile fabric in the long run. The painted surface had also been sealed, resulting in a slight sheen. I have no idea what was used for this, as it had a plastic feel; almost reminding me of a product that I used on interactive exhibits for museum projects – Aquaplastic.

Finally, the netting was replaced with a plastic ½” square version; hot melt glued to the back. As Alessia Carpoca and I looked at this alteration near the end of the day, she asked the same question that has gone through my mind multiple times when seeing hot melt glued netting: “How could anyone be so stupid?” It is the idea that the drops of hot glue will never come of the back without damaging the fabric. The hot glue embeds itself in the weave and is permanently fixed. Even steam and heat only partially removed this product, as I have tried in the past. The process completely destroys the painted surface during its removal.

Meanwhile, Rick was occupied doing another good deed (as usual); helping balance some line sets to make them easier to move. He also took the time to thoroughly explain how the system worked and all of the various components. As previously mentioned, the Scottish Rite Reunion was scheduled to start in four days and some of the lines were difficult to pull.

For the most part, we try to leave any stage better than we found it, even if this means simply explaining a system and scenery for future clarity. In Scottish Rite theaters, the Masonic stagehands are often unfamiliar with the history of both. It is not unusual to find something amiss in these systems that require a simple tweak. After all, the systems have often not been maintained since their installation.

After Rick was done with his talk and the weight adjustment, we headed up to the grid. This was one of the easiest ascents ever to access the space above the stage.

Our journey to the grid at the Louisville Scottish Rite

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system above the stage

We went up steps and followed boards above the auditorium space. I kept an eye out for trash, as treasures were often left in these attic spaces. Sure enough, there was a Mazda Edison box! We balanced our way to a small door, with Jim taking quick grip on me to make sure I would not fall. My sense of mortality has exponentially increased over the years, so I don’t wander to close to the edges anymore. However, I wasn’t going to miss an opportunity accompanying Rick and hearing his observations. It is always fun to be on site with Rick, as he so thoroughly explains what I am looking at and the nuances of each system. It is like the rigging class that does not end.

We left the Scottish Rite late afternoon, and I checked into the Hardy House (my Airbnb for the conference). Just about the time I was settling in and deciding to open a can of soup, I received a text from Randolph. He notified me that the Louisville Scottish Rite librarian and archivist would be contacting me soon, offering me the opportunity to visit the Scottish Rite library that evening. Regardless of my fatigue, this was not an opportunity that I would miss. So within the hour, I was waiting outside for my ride to head back to the Louisville Scottish Rite. It was certainly worth it as I spent the next few hours perusing books and chatting with Richard.

Like many, the library was a fraction of what it had once held. Books were missing and the contents somewhat sparse. However, there were certainly some gems left; absolutely priceless publications that would contribute to my ongoing research about visual sources used by scenic studios to produce Scottish Rite scenery. My biggest surprise was a Cerneau book with many recognizable compositions that were later incorporated into the Scottish Rite scenic designs.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 707 – The Second Louisville Scottish Rite

Part 707: The Second Louisville Scottish Rite

The first Scottish Rite Cathedral in Louisville was a the remodeled building during 1895- St. Paul’s Episcopal Church at Sixth and Walnut Streets. From this moment forward, the Masonic membership in Louisville continued to grow at a rapid rate. By 1919, the Scottish Rite candidate class size numbered 200, and the high membership numbers began exceeding the building’s capacity.

During the 67^th annual spring reunion in 1919, the president of the “Victory Class “of Scottish Rite candidates introduced a resolution. Dr. T. H. Tuley urged “the Grand Consistory immediately to make plans for the erection of a Scottish Rite Cathedral in Louisville which will prove a credit to the Rite and to the city.” The Courier-Journal reported, the reading of the resolution was greeted with applause, and from the manner in which the proposition was received it seems possible some steps in this direction will be taken” (26 April 1919, page 4).

Previously, Courier-Journal published, “Largest Class in History of Consistory Attending Scottish Rite Meeting. 200 At First Dinner” (23 April 1919, page 9). The session opened at 10AM on April 22, with conferring the Lodge of Perfection degrees (4-14). The article noted, “For several months the Scottish Rite has been practically overwhelmed with applications for membership, every Masonic lodge in the State reporting unusually large numbers of initiates. The result has been that for the first time in many years it has been necessary to hold two spring Scottish Rite classes, the first one having completed work only about ten days ago.” Capt. John H. Cowles, sovereign grand inspector general of the Supreme Council of the Rite, was interviewed by the Courier-Times. They reported, “He says unusually large classes are being accepted into the rite in all consistories of the southern jurisdiction. He was highly pleased with the showing made by the Louisville lodge, especially in view of the fact that he received his degrees here and is a native of Kentucky, having lived for many years in Louisville.” In 1919, the Louisville Scottish Rite also premiered a four-page publication for attendees title “The Reunion News,” which was published every day during the reunion. This does not surprise me at all, as the Scottish Rite once met in the same building as the local newspaper, the Courier-Journal. What a great idea.

Scottish Rite membership was explosive during the 1920s and the influential power of the Freemasons was substantial. This is a moment in time when the Rite was very vocal about their activities and positions on both the political and social stage. From the late-nineteenth century to early twentieth century, is was not unusual to find detailed information pertaining to daily activities at Scottish Rite reunions, a list of members, and the history of the organization. The views of the Rite pertaining to public education and other social issues were published for all to read. When a potential candidate thought about joining, there was no question in his mind about what the organization was really about and if it was a good fit. This may be why the Scottish Rite continued to gain ground and dominate the fraternal landscape of America.

On May 11, 1923, the Courier-Journal published that “Scottish Rite Masons will begin a three-day campaign May 23, to raise the $300,000 necessary to complete their building fund for the proposed $750,000 cathedral at the southwest corner of Fourth and Breckinridge Streets. Ground for this structure will be broken in September, it was said. The cathedral will have four stories and basement, with an auditorium seating 1,350 persons. Solicitation will be from the 2,286 members in the State of which 1,200 are in Louisville, The campaign will be in charge if Benjamin S. Washer, Richard Priest Dietzman, Edward F. Metzner, Harvey White and Dr. E. L. Henderson” (page 18).

On June 27, 1923, the old Scottish Rite was sold, becoming the R. E. Jones Temple, Methodist Episcopal Church. On September 9, 1923, the Courier-Journal announced, “The contract for the construction at Fourth and Breckinridge Streets will be awarded shortly after bids are opened about October 15” (page 34).

There is one thing to consider about the second Scottish Rite stage. As a church took possession of the old Scottish Rite building, it is unlikely that any Masonic scenery or artifacts would have been left behind. This means that the old scenery would either have been enlarged for their new home, (as such was the case with the 1910 Guthrie scenery) or it would have been replaced with new scenery and sold to another Scottish Rite theater.

I have only encountered two references about a scenery orders delivered to the Louisville Scottish Rite during the twentieth century. The earliest was in 1910, when the Louisville Scottish Rite purchased scenery from Toomey & Volland. However, Toomey and Volland advertisements from 1912 do not list Louisville alongside fifteen other Scottish Rite Cathedral installations by that time, suggesting that they were only adding to a previous collection. Toomey & Volland may have only expanded the original 1895 scenery collection during 1910. It is unclear if E, A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co delivered the original scenery to Louisville either; meaning in was subcontracted to Sosman & Landis. The Louisville Scottish Rite is not included in a 1902 E. A. Armstrong advertisement that notes all the Consistories that they equipped since 1897. Granted, Louisville was two years earlier in 1895, but it leaves a question in my mind concerning who delivered the scenery. One other person comes to mind – E. T. Harvey. Harvey was the scenic artist who produced Scottish Rite scenery collections for Cincinnati in 1886 and Cleveland in 1901. It will be fun to see what I find on site.

Regardless, by the 1950s, Volland studio records a second scenery order from the Louisville Scottish Rite, but they do not specify exactly what was delivered. This means it the order could have ranged from one scene to an entire collection.

To be continued.