Stage Carpenters and Mechanics – Page 3

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1016 – Scenic Art Wages and the Actor’s Strike, 1919

In 1919 Thomas G. Moses wrote, “The scenic artists have made their minimum scale $50.00, a raise from $36.00, which means a number will have to go back as assistants. Very few are capable of earning $50.00 while a number are worth $60.00 and $75.00.” To put a scenic artist’s salary in perspective, the average actual weekly earnings per week worked in 1919 were $13.55 (Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 29, No. 1, Jan. 1921, pages 78-79). That being said, a large section of men employed suffered in America from extensive under employment. Estimates at the time, noted that the weekly wage for men could have increased to $23.56 if individuals were able to secure 42 to 45 hours of employment each week. So, in the big picture, making $50.00 per week as a scenic artist was a very decent salary at the time. However, that does not mean that their hourly rate was twice that of the average American worker, as they were likely working far more than 45 hours per week. If we take into account Moses’ records of long hours, scenic artists worked 10 to 12-hour days, often six days a week.

Keep in mind that the scenic artist salary increases from $36.00 to $50.00 was during a period of increased unionization in American. Workers needed representation for fair wages, decent hours and safe working conditions. I keep thinking of my grandfather who opted not to work in a steel mills of Milwaukee as a newly arrived immigrant, explaining that if he wanted to work in “hell” he would have stayed in Poland. My grandfather Waszut later ran the north trolley line in Minneapolis. Then, as now, many businesses took advantage of their employees, placing profits ahead of people; the safety of their workers was not a priority. This is why union representation is critical, an organized movement helping implement safeguards while holding businesses accountable. Unfortunately, if often took a tragic event, a horrific moment, that instigated people rise up and act, becoming part of a nationwide movement.

The passion in people becomes ignited to organize and protest. Their protests start because there are a series of unacceptable incidents, especially if there is a history of prior warnings and citations. A tragic event will become the catalyst where people stand up and say, “enough is enough.” That is when the massive protests start. Similarly, those wanting to maintain the status quo try to quickly silence the protestors or distract the public’s eye away from the tragic incident. In 1911, the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was the catalyst for change and increased union representation. Most of the victims dies as a result of neglected safety features, such as locked doors. Seeing women plunge to their death from a burning building, resulted in a demand for change, helping unite organized labor and reform-minded politicians. Here is an article about the tragedy from Smithsonian Magazine: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/uncovering-the-history-of-the-triangle-shirtwaist-fire-124701842/

In regard to the theatre industry in 1919, there was quite a bit of turmoil already, including 1918 measles outbreak, the Spanish Flu and WWI; these presented a series of obstacles…and then there was the actors’ strike.

Image posted at https://www.americantheatre.org/2013/03/01/when-actors-equity-staged-its-first-strike/

On August 21, newspapers across the country reported that six ‘legitimate’ theaters in Chicago, went dark. The cause was a result of musicians and stage mechanics striking in sympathy with the striking actors. The walk-out in six theaters took place just before the afternoon performance on August 20, 1919. I was fascinated with the idea that when the actors fought back, other factions of the industry rushed to their aid; it was a community endeavor.

On August 2, articles described the actions of the sympathizers: “Dick Green, business agent of the local Stage Mechanics’ Union and vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Employees, said the strike yesterday was in sympathy with the actors and that there would be no compromise until the fight with the producing managers’ association in New York was settled. He said the stage hands had no grievances of their own. Officials of Chicago Musician’s Union made a similar statement. A nation-wide spread of the strike is now threatened, according to union officials and the hostile attitude of the theatre managers toward making any concessions indicate a long night…The strike of stage hands and musicians as an adjunct of the Actors’ strike threatens to close every downtown playhouse in Chicago” (“Morning Post” Camden, New Jersey, 21 Aug 1919, page 6)

On August 22, 1919, “The Record” reported the actors strike was augmented by nearly two hundred scenic artists employed by the Schuberts and several score more actors, The article noted, “The Actor’s Equity Association members are jubilant, declaring they are sure they can force the managers to recognize the union and accept the players’ demand” (Hackensack, New Jersey, 22 August 1919, page 16).

However, there was another force at work mentioned in the last paragraph: “Louis Mann has begun the organization of an actors’ organization in opposition to the Equity Association in an effort to end the strike. He is backed by the Producing Managers’ Association and is said to have been given $100,000 by George M. Cohan to finance the project.”

For more information about the 1919 actor’s strike, see “The Lambs Club Remembering the 1919 Actors Strike” (https://t2conline.com/the-lambs-club-remembering-the-1919-actors-strike/) and “When Actors’ Equity Staged Its First Strike” from “American Theatre” (https://www.americantheatre.org/2013/03/01/when-actors-equity-staged-its-first-strike/).

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1013 – Robert P. Carsen, Scenic Artist, Stage Mechanic and Studio Founder

Robert P. Carsen was a scenic artist, stage mechanic and studio founder. He was the one who many scenic studios contacted when they needed to subcontract a carpenter. Over the years Carsen was associated with Buhler, Peltz & Carsen Studio, Peltz & Carsen Studio and the Robt. P. Carsen Scenic Studio. He worked as over hire at many places too, including J. C. Becker & Bro. In the 1920s and 1930s, Robt. P. Carsen’s studio letterheads included, “constructors and painters of theatrical scenery.” His studios address was the same previously cited by Peltz & Carsen, 1507 North Clark Street, Chicago. Peltz passed away in 1919, but his son was also a stage carpenter that worked at Peltz & Carsen.

1923 Advertisement for Peltz & Carsen in a Chicago Directory.

Robert Peter Carlsen was born on May 27, 1876, in Blooming Prairie, Minnesota. Like some other artists, he changed his last name to Carsen by the turn of the twentieth century. He was the son of two immigrants, Emelia Olsen (b. 1855) from Norway and Peter Carlsen (b. 1840) from Denmark. Robert was one of five children born to the couple after their marriage in 1875; two boys and three girls. His sisters were Hilda (b. 1883), Roze (b. 1886) and Helen (b. 1880), with an only brother was named Lewis O. (b. 1878). Lewis went by “Louie.” Both Robert and Louis worked in theatre.

In 1880, the Carlsen family resided at 157 Ivering Street in Faribault, Minnesota. By 1900, each of the boys was listed as a theatre “stage man” in the US Federal Census. At the time, the Carlsen family was living at 276 Goodhue, St. Paul.

The 1910 US Census reported Carsen in Chicago, living with his future wife and her son at 1364 Sedgwick St. Robert was lodging with Herman M. Peltz, Alice McGinnis, and her son Frank McGinnis, Jr. Alice’s maiden name was Bernstein, she was divorced from actor Frank McGinnis. Alice and Frank were married on Aug. 4, 1898.

On Oct. 31, 1912, Carsen married Alice L. Bernstein. He was 36 years old and she was 31 years old. Five years later, Carsen’s 1918 WWI draft registration card lists that he was a contractor and owns his own business at 1507 N. Clark St. This would have been Peltz & Carsen. He was described as tall, with a stout build, blue eyes and sandy hair.

In 1923, Carsen placed advertisements in education journals, business directories, and drama publications. For a why, he specialized in rentals and focused on amateur productions. The 1923 December issue of “The Drama Magazine” included a “Robt. P. Carsen Scenic Studios” ad space noted, “Rent everything in Scenery” (page 120). They were taking a new approach, offering an educational department:

“An announcement

SUSAN STUBBS GLOVER

Authority on lighting and settings for the amateur stage. Is director of our Educational Department. Mrs. Glover’s Screen Stage Settings have had editorial recognition from The Theatre, Variety and The Drama Magazine and her advice is sought by Schools, Colleges and Little Theatre. If you have a stage problem write for our questionnaire.”

Advertisement for Robt. P. Carsen Scenic Studios.

In 1924, Carsen delivered scenery for “Two Little Girls in Blue” at the Harlequin Club in Layfette, Indiana (Journal and Courier, 2 May 1924, page 2). Of the settings, the ‘Lafayette Journal and Courier” reported, “Most of the action of the play takes place aboard ship, making it necessary to provide an elaborate ship setting. The settings that will be used are an exact duplicate of the sets used in the original Erlanger production secured through the Robert Carsen scenic studio of Chicago.”

On May 15, 1925, Moline’s “Dispatch” reported, “The scenic investiture of Robin Hood presents a problem to amateur productions from Chicago, where he arranged with the Robert P. Carsen scenic studios to rent the original DeWolf Hopper scenery and properties as used in the Great Northern theater this winter. This scenery, amounting to almost a carload, will be shipped to Moline and patrons of the opera will be assured at least of the authentic period scenes of the well-loved Sherwood and Nottingham environs. In order that the opera may meet the high standard set by its promoters the costuming will be done by the New York Costume company, one of the finest costume houses in America.” (Moline, Illinois, page 20).

In 1927, Robert P. Carsen Scenic studio was credited with the new system at the Kenosha Theatre in Wisconsin. The “Kenosha News” reported, “The designing construction and rigging of the most modern stage equipment through which a theater giving stage presentations such as the Kenosha must hope to operate smoothly is the result of the efforts of the Robert P. Carsen Scenic Studio of 17507 N. Clark street, Chicago. The stage equipment, which has been pronounced by experts to be without fault, is the sum total of decades of experience in outfitting theater stages.

Carsen married for the second time, Katharine L. Slack in Clinton, Iowa, on July 8, 1941. Carsen passed away on March 10, 1958. At the time, he lived in Michianna Shores, Indiana, and was 81 years old. the death certificate listed his “usual occupation” as a manufacturer in the stage equipment industry. Interestingly, his death certificate lists his parents as Peter Carsen (not Carlson) and Emily Forsythe (not Olsen).

Like Herman Peltz, of Peltz & Carsen, the studio outlived him. The name of Carsen morphed into the studio of ACME, CARSEN & PAUSMACK.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1012 – Herman Peltz, Sr., Stage Mechanic, Peltz & Carsen

There were a few winning combinations for scenic studios during the turn of the twentieth century. The first was the combination of salesman and scenic artist. In this case, both intimately understood the design, painting and building process for stage settings. The second winning combination was the combination of scenic artist and stage carpenter; one built and one painted the settings. However, this meant that someone needed to also work sales. Buhler, Peltz and Carsen combined one scenic artist with two stage mechanics.

Harry H. Buhler was a scenic artist and Herman Peltz a stage mechanic; they both worked at the Criterion Theatre during the early twentieth century before forming Buhler, Peltz and Carsen. Yesterday, I explored the Buhler & Peltz combination at the Criterion Theatre. The two produced settings for a variety of touring shows, written and designed by Lincoln S. Carter between 1906 and 1908. These were huge mechanical affairs with brilliant stage effects that traveled across the country in railways cars packed with “special scenery.” Peltz later partnered solely with Robert Carsen to form “Peltz and Carson.” Both were primarily stage carpenters, an interesting combination at the time and it was a relatively short-lived business venture.

In 1918, Thomas G. Moses mentioned the studio of Peltz & Carsen, as he was looking for a space to rent while working for New York Studios. Today’s post focuses on Herman Maximillian Peltz, Sr.

Peltz was born in 1869, one of three sons born to Margaretha (b. 1840) and Thaugott Peltz (Dec 1801-15 Jan 1890). Little is known of his parents, his upbringing, or his introduction to the theater. However, his parents made the “Criminal Gossip” section of the newspaper when he was nine years old. On March 30, 1878, the “Inter Ocean” reported, “Margaret Peltz is a solitary North Side prisoner for assaulting and battering her husband Trangoth Pelts. Didn’t like his front name most likely” (page 8). That had to have been an embarrassing and tragic experience for the young Peltz.

Herman’s two brothers were Leo Peltz (1863-1940) and Max Peltz (1859-1890), each born in Chicago. Their father was a German immigrant, born in Lankreis Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, in 1801. At the age of 21 yrs. old Herman Peltz married Caroline “Lena” Zellner on 17 Sept 1890. The couple celebrated the birth of four children: Edith Mary, Matthew, Edward and Herman Max Peltz Jr. Only Herman Jr. followed in his father’s footsteps as a stage carpenter. In 1890, Peltz was listed in the Chicago Directory as a “laborer” living at 3640 S. Wood. No industry was listed, but it could have been theatrical; we don’t know. It is during the 1890s that “Herman Peltz” is mentioned as performer associated with several theatrical endeavors. Again, no indication as to when he began focusing on performance or backstage work. However, by 1906 he was working with Harry J. Buhler at the Criterion Theatre in Chicago. By this time, however, his skill set as a stage mechanic was well developed.

The 1910 US Federal Census listed Peltz’ occupation as a “contractor” in the “theatrical” industry. At the time he was lodging with business partner Robert Carsen (age 33), Alice E. McGinnis (divorced female, age 29) and her son Frank (age 11). All four were renting at 1364 Sedgwick Street in Chicago. I have not tracked down where Peltz’s family was living or why they were living apart. Carsen’s occupation was also listed as a contractor in the theatrical industry. Like Peltz, Carsen’s parents were German immigrants.

Advertisement placed in “The Player,” Feb 23, 1912, page 20.

By 1917, Herman M. Peltz, Jr. was working at Peltz and Carsen. His WWI draft registration card lists that he was employed as a stage carpenter, like his father, for the firm. Interestingly, this ensured that the studio of Peltz & Carsen continued after the passing of Herman Peltz., Sr. in 1919.

Herman M. Peltz, Sr. passed away on June 13, 1919, and is buried at Oakridge Cemetery in Chicago, Illinois. The cause of death was listed as “organic disease of the heart due to scoliosis and calcification of the coronary arteries.” Peltz & Carsen continued after the passing of one founded, still active in the early 1920s.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 862: Spencer J. Cox, Contractor and Stage Carpenter

James Cox established the first scenic studio in Estherville, not his younger brother Jesse. James was the proprietor of Cox Scenic Company throughout the first decade of the twentieth century. A 1902 ad lists the Jesse Cox Scenic Co., but that advertisement was placed in a Minnesota newspaper. The Estherville scenic company was eventually associated with his Jesse Cox, and subsequently named the Jesse Cox Scenic Company.

Both James and Jesse were scenic artists, with James later primarily focusing on architecture later in his career. The boys’ father was credited with doing all of the carpentry work for the scenic studio.

Spencer J. Cox was born on July 1, 1847 in Mansfield, New York to James Cox and Aphia Webster. He married Julia Anne Hollenbeck (b. 1852) on August 15, 1870, in Grundy, Illinois. Julia was a fraternal twin and daughter of Justus Hollenbeck. Jesse Cox’s birth name was also Justus, named after his maternal grandfather. Julia’s obituary noted, “To this union eight children were born: Mae, James, Ellry, Jesse, Viola, George, Spencer, and Chauncy Lee. I have not found any information about the girls or Spencer Jr. The couple’s five sons were James Cox (b. 1873), Justus Cox (b. 1878), George L. (b. 1882), Spencer Jr. (b 1884) and Chancy L. (b. 1888). In 1891, the couple moved from Seneca, Illinois, to Estherville, Iowa. After a prolonged illness, Julia passed away on February 4, 1919. Census records note that in 1921 Spencer remarried, with his second wife being Octavia DeVinney (nee. Octavia Turner).

At the time of Spencer’s death, his occupation was listed as a retired contractor. Spencer was also the last surviving member of the Vandenberg Post, G.A.R. The Grand Army of the Republic (G.A.R.) was founded in 1866, joining veterans of the Union Army, Navy, Marines, and the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service. Organized into hundreds of local posts across the country, it was America’s first veteran’s association. The organization’s founding principles were “Fraternity, Charity, and Loyalty.” By 1890, the GAR boasted a membership of 490,000 veterans, such as Cox who served in the Union Army (Co. F., 53rd Illinois Infantry). Spencer enlisted with his brother Patrick.

On March 28, 1933, the Estherville Daily News reported, “S. J. COX LAST OF CIVIL WAR VETERANS DIES” (page 1). The article also provided some interesting context for the Cox studio.

“Is Given Full Military Honors at Burial Today — Legion in Charge
S. J. Cox, last surviving member of Vandenberg Post, G. A. R. has answered his last reveille. He passed away early Sunday morning [26 March 1933] peacefully, closing his eyes on a long and useful lifetime. Mr. Cox would have been 86 years old on July 1. He was born in Cattaraugus County, New York State, and went to Illinois as a child with his parents. It was in 1891 when Mr. Cox came to Estherville as a contractor and builder. He was associated with his oldest son James for a number of years and later with Jesse Cox in the scenic studio, doing all the carpenter work for the stage scenery, which has been shipped by this studio all over the United States.
Entered Union Army at Sixteen. Mr. Cox was proud of his service in the Union army during the last years of the Civil war. He enlisted in Co. F. 53rd Illinois Infantry, in 1863, and served until the close of the war. He became a member of the Vandenberg post here, and was always ready and willing to take part in all patriotic observances. It was his wish that he be buried with military honors and that he wear to his last resting place the regalia he had worn on so many occasions. Mr. Cox while in failing health was up and about until a comparatively short time ago and took part in the last services for all his comrades in the local Civil war veterans’ post, and insisted on carrying the flag of his country for which he had fought so valiantly. Always happy to talk of his war experiences Mr. Cox could hold a listener enthralled for hours telling of his narrow escapes during the battles in which to took part. He marched with Sherman’s army to the sea, and took part in many of the engagements from Chattanooga to Savannah. Mr. Cox is survived by four sons Jesse of Estherville, George of Des Moines, Spencer of Ames and Chauncey Lee of Indianapolis, Ind. James Cox preceded his father in death and their mother died in 1918. Mr. Cox was later married to Mrs. Octavia De Vinney of Lansing, Mich., who survives. There is also one brother Charles of Arroyo, Calif. and one sister, Mrs. Mayme Colgrove of Wilmington, Ill., left to mourn his passing.”

The details of the funeral service were published:
“Burial Today. Flags in Estherville will float at half mast today in honor of Mr. Cox. Funeral services which will be held at one-thirty from the home on East Roberts street and at two o’clock from the Methodist Episcopal church will be in charge of Rev. W. A. Winterstein. Maurice Doyle Post American Legion and the American Legion Auxiliary unit will attend in a body.
A color escort will attend the services at the home and the Legion men will accompany the remains from the church to its burial place in Oak Hill cemetery where the salute will be given by the firing squad and taps blown. Pall bearers will be Dan Howard, C. J. Mathiesen, R. H. Green, Geo. Lyman, Vance Noe and John Lilley.”

A little more information about Cox was reported in the “Vindicator and Republican” (Estherville, Iowa, March 26, 1933). The obituary notice included a brief history about Spencer Cox original published on May 28, 1913.

“S.J. Cox enlisted at Ottawa, Ill., April 15, 1864, in Company F, Fifty-third Illinois Infantry. He was mustered out of service August 28, 1865. His company engaged in their first battle at Bentonville, N.C., and they saw service from that time on. They were with Sherman at Atlanta and fought in the many desperate battles around that city. They had one hundred days of almost constant fighting from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to Atlanta. At Kenesau Mountain, the battle of the Twenty-eight, and at Janesboro they saw some of the hardest service of the war. There were three members of this post that took part in the hard fought battle of Janesboro. From Atlanta Mr. Cox went with Sherman’s army to the sea and was with him to the end of the war. During the entire time in service Mr. Cox kept a record of the distance he walked and it is most surprising to think that a man could walk 3000 miles as Mr. Cox did. After the close of the war Mr. Cox went to Seneca, Ill., to live. He remained there about thirty years and moved to Estherville twenty-one years ago. Mr. Cox is a very energetic man for his age but has always been very hard of hearing since he came out of the service.”

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 806 – New York Studios and David H. Hunt, 1912

In 1912, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Sosman left for the south on a vacation. My work doubles. We are doing a lot of work for the New York Studios – not much profit in it for us, as Hunt seems to think we should be satisfied with a small profit. I have made a number of designs for him which I am pleased to do as long as we get the work.”

David H. Hunt pictured in the “Detroit Free Press,” 21 May 1903, page 12.

Hunt was a long-term employee at Sosman & Landis, founder of the theatrical management firm Sosman, Landis & Hunt (est. 1894), and founder of New York Studios (est. 1910). New York Studios was considered an eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis. In 1905, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Went to Baraboo to see Ringling Bros. Hunt went with me. I don’t know why, as I had to do all the talking and make the sketching for ‘The Field of the Cloth of Gold.’ We got the contract for $3,500.00.” Moses did not get along well with David H. Hunt of New Yorks Studios and periodically mentions the discord in his diary.

By 1910, tensions were high between Moses and Hunt, escalating when Joseph S. Sosman leaves on a 15-week European tour. At the time, both Moses and Hunt were left in charge of the studio, with shops in both Chicago and New York. Hunt was the company secretary and treasure, whereas Moses was responsible for the design, construction and installation of all projects. Of this time, Moses wrote, “Mr. Hunt was secretary and treasurer, and expected to run the business, but I wouldn’t allow it. Mr. Hunt kept on the road most of the time.” After Sosman returned and assessed the studio’s state of affairs, Moses wrote, “I heard some reports as to what Hunt had reported to Sosman about my treatment towards him. I got mad and wanted to quit. Sosman wouldn’t listen to me. I finally got cooled… I arrived June 25th. Sosman had his doubts as to my coming back.” It was around this time that Hunt officially established New York Studios. Smart move, as it was beginning to appear that Chicago was not big enough for both Moses and Hunt.

The establishment of New York Studios is the beginning to the eventual demise of Sosman & Landis. Sosman steps out of the daily running of the company, leaving it to others, while investing in new business ventures such as New York Studios, managed by friend and past employee Hunt. Keep in mind that Sosman was a scenic artist; Hunt was not. Hunt was also working on many other business endeavors that distracted him from solely focusing on any one company, whether it was Sosman & Landis, Sosman, Landis & Hunt, or New York Studios projects. Based on Moses’ description of Hunt and newspaper articles. Hunt reminds me a bit of a salesman selling any pyramid scheme, hoping for maximum returns with minimal investments; it is all based on the underlings beneath him doing the work.

Over the years, Hunt had remained a thorn in Moses’ side for many reasons, including his poor treatment of good artists; prompting many to leave the studio. The exodus of scenic artists from Sosman & Landis included Moses’ good friend, John H. Young. Young went on to dominate the Broadway scene as a well-known designer.

Hunt had started with Sosman & Landis during the early 1890s, quickly worming his way into both Sosman & Landis’ confidence. Although I have yet to find an official start date for Hunt, I estimate that his initial hiring was connected with many Columbian Exposition projects. By 1894, Hunt convinced Sosman & Landis to establish, the theatrical management firm of Sosman, Landis & Hunt. This was a secondary business venture; a company that leased theaters and founded touring companies in Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Detroit. The firm kept Hunt busy as the primary manager for the endeavor, yet the Sosman & Landis studio staff from Chicago completed much of the necessary work. Moses’ diaries suggest that Hunt did not treat the artistic staff working for Sosman, Landis & Hunt well; scenic artists were swapped and directed to various projects like pawns on a chessboard, ready to be sacrificed at any point. Throughout this period Hunt had remained on the administrative end of the studio, always finding the public spotlight to share his great wisdom on a subject.

By 1910, Hunt also talked Sosman into investing in a new business venture – New York Studios. That year, Moses wrote, “Hunt had started a New York studio in New York City and he expected us to do a great deal of work, as he had Sosman invest a small amount.” New York Studios listed Adelaide A. Hunt as the President, Edward A. Morange as the vice president, and David H. Hunt, as the Treasurer. The company’s starting capital was $40,000, and listed the following directors: Edward A. Morange, Adelaide A. and David H. Hunt, with offices located at 325 W 29^thStreet, New York. Business listings noted that theatrical equipment was the primary product produced by the company. Now there were two scenic studios to consider, and only one Moses. In the 1919 Adelaide A. Hunt was still listed as president of New York Studios, with Edward Morange as Vice-President and David H. Hunt as treasurer, still supplying theatrical goods. Office locations varied from 29^th to 39^th to 95^th Streets. Many scenic artists worked for New York Studios including John H. Young, William F. Hamilton, Victor Higgins, William Smart, Art Rider, and Al Dutheridge to name a few.

1927 New York Studios advertisement in the publication, “Scenic Artist.”

New Yorks Studios was listed as the eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis, whereas Sosman & Landis were listed at the western offices of New York Studios. Studio stamps on the back of some designs at the University of Minnesota’s Performing Arts scenery collection list the New York Studios “Home Office” at 328 West 39^th St. N.Y. There are other New York Studio designs that link designs to their “Chicago Office.” The Chicago Office for New York Studios was located at 1022 Consumers Building, separate from the main offices of Sosman & Landis on Clinton St.

Sosman & Landis Studio and New York Studios were two very separate entities. Although they shared work and scenic artists, Moses hints that New York Studios always got more out of the relationship than Sosman & Landis, always taking advantage of the situation.

Studio stamp on the back of a design, now part of the Holak Collection in the University of Minnesota Performing Arts Archives.

New York Studios design, now part of the Holak Collection in the University of Minnesota Performing Arts Archives.

New York Studios stencil on the back of a folding wood wing purchased by Thalian Hall, Wilmington, NC.

Between 1910 and 1912, Hunt and New York Studios were repeatedly mentioned in several newspaper articles across the country. One particular article concerned an electrical apparatus that enabled one man to handle sixty-five drops. Hunt was part of a group interviewed about the innovation; again his being in the right place at the right time. Hunt was chumming around with Martin Beck (manager of the Orpheum Theatre), A. C. Carson (manager of the Denver Orpheum), and Fred W. Vincent (New York booking offices). Regardless of Moses’ complaints, Hunt was a genius at social networking and always falling in with the right crowd.

In regard to Hunt keeping company with Beck, Carson and Vincent in 1910, I am including a section of the group interview with a “Lincoln Star” reporter. On Dec. 18, 1910, the “Lincoln Star” quoted Beck, “‘I have just inspected the invention of Seth Bailey, stage manager of the Orpheum in Denver,’ said Mr. Beck. ‘He has devised an electrical appliance which makes it possible for one man to handle sixty-five drops. It operates everything from the stage curtain to the back, gives absolute fire protection and does the work of an average of twenty stagehands. One man can operate it. It looks good to me, and if further tests prove it as successful as the indications are here we will install in all the Orpheum Theatres. ‘The apparatus for handling drops, consisting of ropes and counterweights, has been the same for 200 years,’ said A. C. Carson, manager of the Denver Orpheum house. ‘Mr. Bailey has perfected, the first invention, bringing the stage mechanism up to date. It has been a field neglected by inventors.’

By 1911, newspapers reported, “Theatrical men and others in Denver have organized a $500,000 corporation to manufacture a mechanical device, which, it claimed, will reduce the number of stage hands needed in a theatre by three-fourths, at least. The new corporation is called the Bailey Fly Rail Machine Company. It is incorporated under the laws of Colorado. Seth Bailey, stage carpenter at the Denver Orpheum, is the inventor of the device. He worked on it several years before he announced that it was successful. About two months ago Martin Beck, M. Meyerfeld Jr., John W. Considine and other vaudeville managers, met in Denver and saw a demonstration of the apparatus. They appeared to be highly pleased with it. The names of A. C. Carson, manager of the Denver Orpheum; Fred W. Feldwich and Frank Bancroft appear at the prime movers in the matter of incorporation. Mr. Bancroft is an attorney. The device is operated by electricity (“Wilkes-Barre Times Leader,” 18 Feb 1911, page 11). Other than patents, the stage carpenter and company seem to have vanished into thin air, as did Hunt’s association with the endeavor.

What remains significant in terms of theatre history is that Hunt was there, part of the vaudeville managers who gathered to see Bailey’s invention. He was certainly a mover and shaker. I will continue with David Hunt’s story tomorrow.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 769 – The Ever Changing Staff at Sosman & Landis, 1911

In 1911, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Mr. Brown, our foreman carpenter, died February 27^th, very suddenly.” Sosman & Landis suffered the loss of their foreman carpenter the same month that they also unexpectedly lost one of their veteran scenic artists. David A. Strong passed away on February 5, 1911. This caused a monumental shift for the company; one compounded with the increasing absences of company founder Joseph S. Sosman.

Two deaths and an absentee studio owner could not have come at a worse time, as it was an extremely busy year at Sosman & Landis. A few of the 1911 projects mentioned by Moses in his typed memoirs include, the Columbia Burlesque Theatre, a “Mme. Butterfly” set for Joe Sheehan, multiple designs for the Brewers’ Show, stock scenery for the Keeley, two unidentified projects in St. Louis, “picture contracts” in Fort Wayne and Chattanooga, Masonic work in Lawrence, Kansas, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and, Memphis, Tennessee, as well as a “good curtain” for Lincoln, Nebraska. In addition to Moses records, historical newspapers list dozens of projects that were not mentioned by Moses during 1911.

One of the hundreds of Masonic drops painted at Sosman & Landis in 1911. This one ended up in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

Work was plentiful across the country, with many of the contracts being secured by Moses. Since 1904, when he returned to the studio for a final time, Moses continued to increase his national reputation for speed and quality. He was becoming synonymous with the high standard associated with Sosman & Landis. In a sense, Moses had slowly become the face of the company, securing many contracts based on the strength of his sketches and design work. He wrote, “Closed another contract on the strength of my sketches – $1,800.00. I was obliged to remain at the Clinton Street studio only going to 20^th Street every other day.” It was no surprise that the Board of Directors immediately elected Moses president of Sosman & Landis when Joseph Sosman passed away in 1915.

Sosman & Landis’ 20^th Street studio, also referred to as the annex, is where Moses and his crew were often working – unless Sosman was away on business. The main studio on Clinton Street housed the company’s official offices, sewing rooms and carpentry area. In a sense, the annex was a bit of an oasis, apart from the hustle and bustle of sixty employees in the Clinton Street space. The 20^th Street studio only employed a quarter of the main work force, approximately fifteen artists and their assistants.

Unfortunately, after the passing of Strong and Brown during the month of February, the main studio on Clinton Street needed guidance, and direct supervision. Moses needed to fill a few roles by March, while scrambling to replace a lead artist and carpenter. In the past, Moses’ right hand man, Ed Loitz would manage the 20^th Street studio during Moses’ absence, but there were too many moving parts and Loitz was working on other projects that spring. Of the crew at the annex, Moses wrote,”Pausback had his hands full. Scott acted bad. Got Geo. Schultz on the staff at 20^th Street.” A quick turnover was happening and new personalities were constantly being added to the mix.

Everything was going to rapidly change, with Toomey & Volland of St. Louis, soon surpassing their Chicago competition.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 742 – Drop Curtains in Philadelphia, 1894 – Gilmore’s Auditorium and H. J. Overpeck

Gilmore’s Auditorium constructed at 807 Walnut Street in Philadelphia, just one in a series of popular nineteenth-century theaters located at the same address. Welch’s National Amphitheatre and Circus, the Continental Theatre, the American Variety Theatre, Fox’s New American Theatre, the Grand Central Theatre, and Gilmore’s Auditorium. The tale of four fires is presented in an interesting post by Harry Kyyriakodis about about the various entertainment venues at this address. Here is the link: https://hiddencityphila.org/2013/05/blazing-ballerinas-and-a-rampaging-elephant-at-807-walnut-street/

Photograph of Gilmore’s Auditorium, Philadelphia, from the “Official Building Directory and Architectural Handbook of Philadelphia,” 1899, p 257.

The theater’s proprietor, William J. Gilmore, had made a career in theater management by the time Gilmore’s Auditorium was constructed. He had successfully managed several Philadelphia theaters as well as others across the country.

“The Times” included an article on Gilmore’s Auditorium rising from the site of the burned Central theatre on June 4, 1893 (page 15). The article reported, “From the ruins of the New Central Theatre is rapidly rising a new building that will be, when completed, one of the finest playhouses in America. The new theatre will be known as ‘Gilmore’s Auditorium,’ and built in the Moorish style of architecture, from brownstone, terra cotta and light buff brick, beautifully embellished with colored glass and new electric lights. Architect John D. Allen, under whose direct supervision the house is being erected, has provided every device known to modern science that contributes to the safety and comfort and convenience of the prospective patrons, resulting in a building that is practically fireproof. One of the chief factors contributing to this end of the building is the proscenium wall, having no opening between the stage and auditorium except the arch, which is protected by a heavy asbestos curtain, while the stage roof is fitted with an automatic ventilator, so adjusted that a rise of a few degrees in temperature will at once open it and form an excellent flue by means of which any flames that might possibly break out in the stage or among the scenery, would be diverted from the building proper. The system of heating and ventilating adopted has been proved absolutely effective, thus insuring a cool house in summer and a warm one in winter. The colors selected for all interior decorations are such that everything harmonizes in the manner, forming a perfect rest for the eyes, which is not destroyed even when the full glare of the innumerable electric lights is turned on. So rapidly has the work of construction progressed that although the ground was broken only on February 8 last, it is expected to throw open the building for inspection early in August. Taking into consideration that only thirty-two clear working days were available since the beginning of the work the progress has been wonderfully rapid, although everything has been done in the most careful and workmanlike manner.”

Image of Gilmore’s Auditorium during construction from “The Times,” (Philadelphia) 4 June 1893, page 15

Gilmore’s Auditorium was illuminated by electricity and boasted a seating capacity of 3,076. John R. Wilkins was listed as the scenic artist in Julius Chan’s Official Theatrical Guide, 1896. With the theatre on the ground floor, the proscenium measured 33 feet wide by 34 feet high, with the distance from the footlights to the back wall being 30 ½ feet. The distance between the side walls was 75 ½ feet and the distance between the girders measured 42 feet. It was 60 feet from the stage to the rigging loft, with the depth under the stage measuring 9 feet. There were three traps and one bridge along the back wall. By 1905, Gilmore’s Auditorium became the Casino Theatre, soon gaining a reputation as a popular burlesque venue.

The Gilmore’s Auditorium asbestos curtain was mentioned in “Well-known Drop Curtains in Philadelphia Theatres,” published in “The Philadelphia Inquirer on Dec. 18, 1894. Instead of listing the scenic artist, the article highlighted the stage carpenter for his innovative stage machinery- hydraulic engine was used to lift the asbestos curtain.

“The asbestos curtain in Gilmore’s Auditorium is a model of its kind. The curtain is thirty-four feet wide by thirty-six feet high, and is lifted and lowered by means of a one-half inch steel wire cable over a drain in the flies. The curtain, which is nearly one-half an inch thick, is not rolled up, but lifted bodily, away up in the flies by a small hydraulic engine. It is painted a creamy buff in harmony with the other decorations, but is devoid of any ornament save the single word “Asbestos” painted in the center. All of the act and scene “drops” in this popular amusement temple, like the asbestos drop, are made to lift bodily, the system, which is new, being devised and put in by Mr. Gilmore’s stage carpenter, H. J. Overpeck.”

. The only information that I have uncovered pertaining to anyone named Overpeck in the theatrical profession is an A. J. Overpeck who was listed as a stage machinist with Baitley Campbell’s Siberia in Harry Miner’s Professional Directory (1884). By 1896, Julius Cahn’s Official Theatrical Guide would list Harry Spillman as the stage carpenter and electrician.

Of asbestos curtains, however, an interesting article was published the same year in the “Boston Globe” (23 Feb. 1894, page 8).

“Asbestos Curtain at the Boston.

It is the duty of every theatrical manager to provide his patrons with the best protection possible against fire. No means has yet been discovered equal to a fireproof curtain, and such a one as the Boston Theater has just been put in place is the best of its kind. The curtain is 52 by 50 feet and is made entirely of asbestos. It is hung by wire rope which runs through iron chives [sheaves] fastened into the brick wall over the proscenium, and as all the battens are of iron piping, there is not a bit of woodwork or anything combustible about the entire construction.

The curtain was put in place by Mr. W. P. Prescott, the theater’s machinist, who also made all of the machinery. Last week a test was made before the insurance commissioner, and he pronounced it a splendid piece of mechanism and an ample protection.

By pulling a small wire rope at the prompt stand the curtain can be lowered in three seconds, so that in case of fire not an instant will be lost in shutting off the auditorium from the stage by an asbestos wall through which no flames could penetrate.”

Furthermore, an article in the “Democrat and Chronicle” (Rochester, New York) on Dec. 6, 1894, was entitled “Theater Fires” (page 6). It reported, “Statistic of theater fires from 1751 to the present year have been compiled by the Scientific American, and the figures show a total of 460 theaters destroyed in all countries during the period covered. There were 31 of these disasters in London, 29 in Paris and 29 in New York. The number of victims was great, but as separate lists of the killed and wounded are not given, no accurate statement of the loss of life can be made. It was, however, appalling.” The article later commented, “We believe that most of the modern theaters in this country afford fair protection of their patrons, by means of asbestos curtains, which can be lowered quickly, separating the stage from the auditorium, and by reasonably ample facilities for exit.”

Finally, as asbestos curtains gained prominence by the end of the 19^th century, a funny article came out that reminded me of the plain asbestos curtain hanging at Gilmore’s Auditorium. It was published in the “Philadelphia Inquirer” on Feb. 7, 1897, page 20: “I has an afternoon off this week,” said a well-known comedian to me last evening, “and as I had nothing else to do I wandered into a theatre where a matinee was being given. Directly in front of me sat two stylishly-gowned girls, and they wore hats that were veritable flower gardens. Of course, I could se very little of the stage, but I was repaid by the charming conversation I was forced to overhear. It was just previous to the opening overture and the fair maids were discussing the asbestos curtain.

“That curtain is not half as pretty as the one they used to have here,” said one.

“No indeed it is not, chimed in the other.

“By the way, Marie, who was Asbestos?”

“Asbestos?” queried her friend.

“Why Asbestos was a Roman general, wasn’t he?”

“Was he?”

“No. Laura; let me think – Oh, I remember now; he was a mythological character.”

“Why to be sure he was,” acquiesced Laura.

“How foolish of me not to have thought of it.”

“And they resumed munching caramels.”

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 709 – “Installation Shall be Under the Direction of Bestor G. Brown”

Part 709: “Installation Shall be Under the Direction of Bestor G. Brown”

By 1910, the process of manufacturing and installing Scottish Rite scenery collections operated by Brown’s special system was running like a well-oiled machine. M. C. Lilley & Co. landed the work and subcontracted the scenery, stage machinery and lighting portion to Sosman & Landis. M. C. Lilley & Co. provided the costumes, regalia and other necessary paraphernalia.

Up to this point, I have discussed the scenery produced for Little Rock, Oakland, Wichita, Guthrie, Fargo, Salina, Portland and others at the turn of the twentieth century. Let’s jump ahead a decade at the peak production of Scottish Rite scenery in the Sosman & Landis studio, 1909-1910. During that two-year period, Sosman & Landis produced scenery and stage machinery for Kansas City, Kansas; Winona, Minnesota; Dallas, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Memphis, Tennessee; Guthrie, Oklahoma (second installation); St. Paul, Minnesota; Denver, Co; and Indianapolis, Indiana. Keep in mind that at this time the studio also refurbished the Wichita scenery from 1898 and delivered it to Yankton, South Dakota. There are other collections from this period that remain unidentified at this time.

I have also looked in detail at the promotion of Brown’s special system, a method of counterweighting the scenery, that was marketed by well known Mason, Bestor G. Brown. For Masonic context, Brown was a Past Grand Mater of the Grand Lodge of Kansas (1903) and a member of numerous Masonic orders, including the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in both the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction. Brown also belonged to the Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias and Improved Order of Redmen. His profession was that of western sales manager for M. C. Lilley & Co., a supplier of fraternal, military and band goods. He was also considered the only Masonic Stage carpenter in the United States.

There is an interesting section in the 1910 contract between M. C. Lilley & Co., represented by Brown, and the Guthrie Scottish Rite:

“The installation shall be under the direction of Bestor G. Brown who will take charge of and handle the stage during the first reunion, without compensation or expense of any kind, provided of course, sickness or other preventing circumstances shall not operate and abridgement of any in terms of this contract or the pecuniary liability expressed therein.”

This is big, and I doubt that this is an unusual occurrence. It also explains why Brown was considered the Masonic stage carpenter, ruler of the realm behind the footlights. This single sentence in the contract places Brown on site during the first Scottish Rite Reunion that uses the new stage machinery and scenery. It means that at the completion of each Scottish Rite project there is an individual on site to supervise the initial operation of the system, keeping an eye on Masonic stagehands that are unfamiliar with the backstage aspects of a theatrical production.

There are two significant things to consider:

First of all, after most Sosman & Landis theater installations, the company representative superintending the site work remained on site as the theater opened, or at least operated the system to familiarize the client with the new products. In fact, Sosman & Landis had several employees who traveled from location, to location, installing scenery and stage machinery. The supervisor of each installation worked with a crew of carpenters and then operated the system for the client upon completion. Often after an installation – the superintendent of the work would show how everything worked upon completion. In 1887, newspapers reported that Sosman & Landis would, “complete everything, ready for the rise of the curtain, and will run the stage for the first performance.”

We also know that certain that at least one Sosman & Landis stage carpenter traveled without drawings. In the case of Charles S. King and the Crump Theatre project during the late nineteenth century, he was the only individual who was personally held the knowledge pertaining to the carpentry work and installation of the stage machinery and scenery. to install the stage systems. This was a smart move and may have prevented information from being shared with Sosman & Landis’ competitors, keeping new innovations safeguarded, just as guilds protected trade secrets. The knowledge of a new method for installing counterweight systems placed Sosman & Landis ahead of their competitors to deliver more scenery, as Brown’s special system placed the rigging lines close together.

As the scenery and stage machinery were subcontracted Sosman & Landis, it also makes sense that Brown would be on site, representing M. C. Lilley & Co. and directly communicating with the client. After all, the one installing the scenery may not be a Mason or hold that necessary “charm” when the client became a challenge. Also, keep in mind that it was M. C. Lilley & Co. who directly contracted the entire theatre portion of the project with each Scottish Rite.

The second article of note in this clause is that Brown would “take charge of and handle the stage during the first reunion.” He had to, especially if the Sosman & Landis stage carpenter was not a Mason. Fortunately for M. C. Lilley & Co. Brown was a Scottish Rite member in the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction, as well as a fraternal salesman. An active Scottish Rite Mason had to be the onsite eyes during that first reunion; and that was Brown, ensuring that everything operated as promised.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 670 – A Melting Pot of Ingenuity

Part 670: A Melting Pot of Ingenuity

There are four things to consider when examining the development of Brown’s Special System – the Chicago Auditorium, the Beckwith Memorial Auditorium, the scenic studio of Albert, Grover & Burridge, and Sosman & Landis. There is no linear progression of events and Chicago is a melting pot of ingenuity.

I’ll start with what Rick Boychuk wrote in “Nobody Looks Up: The History of the Counterweight Rigging System,1500-1925.” Boychuk contends that Chicago Auditorium of 1889 is a game changer in the future of American counterweight rigging. Of the endeavor, he writes, “The first counterweight rigging system in American was state-of-the-art technology when it was installed in 1889 in the Auditorium Building in Chicago – commonly referred to as the Chicago Auditorium” (page 167). Boychuk explains how Ferdinand Peck, the visionary for the Chicago auditorium, traveled to Europe to examine opera houses, later joined by architect Dankmar Adler (Adler & Sullivan) and Chicago stage carpenter John Bairstow. Boychuk states, “Chicago borrowed the sheave design and configuration from Budapest and the balance of the counterweight system from Vienna” (page 172). Read his book.

Things to think about as we contemplate the evolution of Brown’s special system: the Chicago Auditorium stage carpenter, Bairstow, was one of the charter members who founded Chicago’s Theatrical Mechanics Association. In fact, he was the organization’s first president in Chicago. Bairstow was a member of TMA Chicago Lodge No. 4. David Austin Strong was also a Member of Chicago Lodge. No. 4. At the time they were both members in 1891, Strong was an employee of Sosman & Landis, and was also credited as being the “Daddy of Masonic Design.”

David Austin Strong, scenic artist and stage mechanic

This title was given to him by Thomas Gibbs Moses in his 1931 memoirs; Moses became the president of Sosman & Landis in 1915. Before Chicago, Strong enjoyed a successful career in New York as both a scenic artist and stage carpenter. Strong even provided one of the scenes for the 1866 production of “The Black Crook” at Niblo’s Garden Theatre. At this same time, the Theatrical Mechanics Association was founded in New York (1866). During the 1870s Strong relocated to Chicago, the hub of theatrical construction and activities after the great fire of 1871. Joseph S. Sosman moved to Chicago in 1874, with the Sosman & Landis studio being established by 1877. Sosman & Landis was the primary manufacturer and installer of Brown’s special system in Scottish Rite theaters across the country.

At Sosman & Landis, Strong, Moses, and another stage carpenter by the name of Charles S. King were part of a special group; this group could be considered scenic artists with a thorough understanding of stage machinery, or stage carpenters who paint extremely well. Each had a specific task that he gravitated toward, but their job title by no means limited their abilities and contributions to one task or a single skill. Others in this group included Walter Burridge and Ernest Albert. Albert and Burridge were two of three founders who established another Chicago scenic studio in 1891 – Albert, Grover, and Burridge. One of their largest projects would be the manufacture and delivery of scenery and stage machinery for the Beckwith Memorial Theatre in Dowagiac, Michigan. This theater is significant within the framework of American theatre history.

Here is a refresher of the Albert, Grover & Burridge before revisiting the Beckwith Memorial Theatre and its link to the Chicago Auditorium. Ernest Albert (1857-1946), Oliver Dennett Grover (1861-1927) and Walter Burridge (1857-1913) founded “Albert, Grover & Burridge.” Their studio was located at 3127-33 State Street, Chicago, covering an area of 100×125 feet. Two of the founders had a significant tie to stage carpenter Bairstow: Albert worked as a scenic artist for the Chicago Auditorium and Chicago Opera House, while Walter Burridge was the scenic artist for both the Grand Opera House and McVicker’s. Keep in mind that John Bairstow worked as a stage carpenter at McVickers, the Grand Opera and the Chicago Auditorium. Grover was an art instructor at the Chicago Art Institute and linked to the planning of the Columbian Exposition. Albert and Burridge both worked with Thomas G. Moses at Sosman & Landis during the 1880s. Each would have known the long-time Sosman & Landis stage carpenter, Charles S. King. King is also a possible contender for the conception and development of Brown’s special system.

Advertisement for Albert, Grover & Burridge

The scenic studio of Albert, Grover & Burridge is described in “Chicago and its Resources Twenty Years After, 1871-1891: A Commercial History Showing the Progress and Growth of Two Decades from the Great Fire to the Present Time.” The studio was mentioned as implementing advancements in the methods of mounting and presentation of stage plays. Albert, Grover & Burridge leased the old Casino building on State Street, just south of 31^st street, and renovated it. Their space included 12,000 square feet of working area, and another 2,500 square feet devoted to storage and sewing room. There were twenty paint frames, ranging from 56 by 35 feet to 30 by 20 feet. This was a sizable complex.

A unique feature implemented by Albert, Grover & Burridge was that it included a staging area for scenic effects and innovations. The abovementioned publication reports, “The studio is so large that it permits the artists to introduce a novel feature in the art of painting scenery, which has been in their thoughts for some years. That is after a scene is painted, it can be hung, set and lighted in an open space the full size of any stage in the country, so that a manager can not only inspect it as an entirety, and thus suggest alterations, but he can bring his company to the studio and rehearse with the new scenery.” This idea had already been partially implemented by the Hanlon brothers at their private theater and workspace in Cohasset, where their master mechanic William Knox Brown tested new stage machinery and effects. Albert, Grover & Burridge went beyond the manufacture of scenery – they were the visionaries who combined painted illusion, lighting innovations, and new stage machinery. They were no different from other scenic studios in Chicago, they just had the space to expand and add a staging area. Scenic studios, with their staff of stage carpenters and scenic artists remained at the forefront of technological advancements, integrating old techniques with new technology. Unfortunately for Albert, Grover & Burridge, their business venture went bankrupt in two years, so they were not around when E. A. Armstrong and Bestor G. Brown were looking for a scenic studio to subcontract for Scottish Rite work. Sosman & Landis were waiting in the wings. However, their contributions can not be discounted when looking at the circle of innovators who helped disseminate the new counterweight technology.

By 1901, a Minneapolis “Star Tribune” article notes new settings at the Bijou Theatre in the article “Experts Behind the Scenes” (January 13). This provides a little context into the shifting staging techniques for commercial theater productions: “The stage proper was divided by the old system of grooves, which were used to hold up the scenery into divisions, one, two, three and four, where the stage was extra deep, sometimes five and six. Grooves are a mechanical contrivance in which the scenes slide back and forth. This method of stage setting is very seldom employed at the present time, the more modern arrangements of setting scenes in a box shape, supporting them with braces and connecting them by lash lines, being more common use.” At the same time box sets became more standard leg drops and fly scenery replaced wings, shutters, and roll drops.

In 1899 the fly scenery at the Beckwith Memorial Theatre is examined in “W.A. Norton’s Directory of Dowagiac, Cassopolis and La Grange, Pokagon, Silver Creek and Wayne Townships” (1899). The publication reports, “The scenery is designed for the cyclorama effect which has been found so effective, and which was first used in the Auditorium in Chicago. By this arrangement a scene can be set as a street or garden by simply moving the scenes which are profiled on both sides and top, anywhere desired. Every set of scenery is a finished piece of art. It is, after the latest fashion, lashed together with ropes and is capable of being made into seventy-five distinct stage dressings” (page 159). Earlier newspapers described the thirty-six hanging drops that could be combined in various combinations for seventy-six set possibilities.

Drop curtain by Albert, Grover, & Burridge for the Beckwith Memorial Theatre

The Dowagiac “Republican” from January 18, 1893 described the new building as “The finest theater in America,” elaborating on the painted scenery: “It is the fitting and arrangement of the stage in the Beckwith Memorial Theatre, that the greatest care has been exercised to obtain the best possible results, and a great degree of success has been obtained. To go into technicalities and the use of stage terms would not be perhaps intelligible to our readers generally, so we will note only the main points. The stage is fifty by thirty-eight feet. Up to the gridiron, from which is suspended by an elaborate system of lines and pulleys all of the stage settings it is possible to use in the form of drop curtains, is fifty feet, allowing ample room for hoisting out of sight a whole screen in a few seconds, and allowing rapid changing of scenes so necessary to the continuing of the action of a play and effects are made possible that were unknown in the old days of sliding flats. To those acquainted with and interested in things theatrical and matters pertaining to proper stage fitting we think it is sufficient guarantee of the success of the stage to say that Albert, Grover & Burridge, of Chicago, had the direction of the stage fittings and the wall decorations of the auditorium and the entire building. Ernest Albert, of A., G., & B., under whose direction the art glass, colorings, the selection of draperies, and the furnishings of the theater were made, had succeeded admirably in producing the most beautiful and harmonious whole.”

The Beckwith Memorial Theatre of Dowagiac, Michigan, was built in 1892 for the cost of one hundred thousand dollars. Albert, Grover & Burridge directed the plan and installation of all stage fittings, the wall decorations of the auditorium, and painted décor throughout the entire building. This was a major extravagance for a small town that numbered less than seven thousand people. For more information pertaining to this theater, see past installment 134.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 639 – Operating Means for Curtain Drops, Victor H. Volland in 1926

A little more than a decade after Seth G. Bailey invented an electrical mechanism for handling hanging scenery, Victor H. Volland came up with another option to handle scenery. In 1930, the United States Patent Office published an application filed on August 23, 1926 for operating curtain drops.

*Victor H. Volland filed a patent in 1926 to operate scenery. Here are the drawings.*

*Victor H. Volland filed a patent in 1926 to operate scenery. Here is a detail.*

Victor H. Volland of Clayton Missouri, assignor to Volland Scenic Studio, Inc. of St. Louis Missouri, a corporation of Missouri submitted an application for a patent pertaining to the “Operating Means of Curtain Drops.” Victor wrote, “My invention related to improvements in means for operating curtain drops, in which each curtain drop together with hoisting mechanism and other accessories are combined into a single unit.”

Victor H. Volland was Hugo R. Volland’s son. Hugo R. Volland (1866-1921) founded a scenic studio in St. Louis, Missouri with Patrick J. Toomey (1861-1922) called Toomey & Volland at the turn of the twentieth century. Here’s little background about the inventor of the patent’s family.

Hugo R. Volland was born on May 6, 1866 in Großenbach, Germany. He was first listed as a St. Louis resident in 1888, living with his brother Otto and advertising as a painter. He worked for Noxon & Toomey as a studio as a scenic artist and secretary for the firm in 1892. By 1901, Hugo R. became vice-president of Noxon & Toomey. In 1902, the firm’s name was changed to Toomey & Volland. Toomey remained president of the company until 1919 when he retired. Hugo R. then became president, with his youngest son being vice-president.

Hugo R. and his wife Laura had three children – Louis J. (1897-1973), Victor H. (1899-1964) and Rose M. daughter, Rose (married name was Rose du Mosch). We are going to focus on the sons for now.

Even though Victor H. was the youngest son, he would be the first successor of Hugo R after his passing in 1921. Victor H. joined the United states Army during July 1918 (Private, 332nd Battalion, Company A). He entered the Tank Corps and sailed Sept. 29, 1918, landing at Bordeaux where he was stationed at Langres, France.

He safely returned home from military service and married by 1920. Victor became the secretary for Toomey & Volland and continued in this position until his father’s death in 1921. At this point the company began to change, as Toomey had already retired three years prior to Victor taking the reign from his father. When Victor became president of the company, his older brother Louis became the vice-president. At this time there was a notable shift in the tenor of the company.

There was also a shift in studio locations. In 1900, Toomey & Volland studio was located at 2312-14-16 Market Street, just outside the downtown theatre district. This lot was owned by Toomey. In 1922, Toomey & Volland scenic studios moved to a new location at 3731-33-35-37 Cass Avenue. Hugo R. never saw the completion of the new building as he died of heart disease before its completion. His wife Laura also passed away from heart disease, just a few months later; she died in a theater.

Patrick Toomey died from a heart attack in 1922 only a year after Volland passing. His passing was the same month that the studio was anticipated to open – March. Toomey’s only son followed a different path in life and the scenic studio was under the complete control of the Volland family. To lose the two founders within a year, caused major changes in the company’s focus. The production of painted scenery at the studio began to take a back seat, and the manufacture theatrical equipment assumed a more dominant role. Furthermore, the name of Toomey was removed from the firm, beginning the age of Volland Scenic Studios, Inc.

Imagine my surprise yesterday evening, to see a detail photo of a fly rail with lights that looked like Volland’s drawing from his patent on FB Group Archiving Technical Theatre History. On February 7, 2019, Robert Bob Foreman posted a photograph with “Has anyone ever seen one of these? Mounted to the flyrail of the 1927 (Kalamazoo) State Theatre, it appears to be a series of cue lights, with switches operated by the cue-ee! System installer unknown.”

*1927 State Theatre in Kalamazoo, Michigan*

*Drawing from Victor H. Volland’s patent, filed in 1926*

In all appearances, it looked like a part of what Volland invented in 1926. Attached is the 1926 patent with images. Volland’s patent described, “Mounted in the guard box 18 is an incandescent lamp 19 provided with a switch 20, said guard box being secured to a forwardly projecting end of the top member 11. At a particular time during a theatrical performance the map 19 may be caused to light, indicating to an attendant that a certain curtain is wanted, and by opening the lock 12 and pulling the rope 7, the curtain is raised or lowered as desired. Prior to this invention such devices were without individual locking devices and signal lamps.”

To be continued…