Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery, Ohio, March 4, 2025.

Copyright © 2025 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

I spent four days in Columbus, Ohio, last week. The trip was sandwiched in between load-in and tech week for the Gilbert & Sullivan Very Light Opera Co. production of Patience. The trip also fell between the opening and closing of my son’s first high school musical as a performer. Aaron was cast in the role of Nigel Bottom for Armstrong Highschool’s production of Something’s Rotten.

My journey to Ohio was for three specific projects:

1.) Documenting an 1883 historic scenery collection in Fort Recovery.

2.) Teaching a paint lab class at USITT (United States Institute of Theatre Technology) in Columbus.

3.) Photographing the birthplace of Joseph Sosman in Chillicothe.

It is hard to pinpoint the highlight of my trip, but documenting the Sosman & Landis scenery is certainly close to the top.

Two Sosman & Landis shutters delivered to the Morvilius Opera House in 1883, Fort Recovery, Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Lorri Kaup in front of the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery, Ohio. The stage is located on the second floor of the building. The front windows are on the upstage wall. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 4, 2025.
Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Morvilius Opera House before the wings and shutters were removed from the stage.
The ceiling of the Morvilius Opera House before the ceiling was repaired and repainted. Sadly, not all of the original ornamental painting was preserved or replicated.

Prior departing for Ohio, I recognized that my journey would be fueled by coffee and chaos. I took a very early flight to Columbus and immediately headed west to Fort Recovery. Morvilius Opera House steward, Lorri Kaup, picked me up from the airport and we began our two-hours drive.

Our drive passed though farmland, a picturesque rural route reminiscent of any midwestern drive. Fields are mostly dormant now, but dotted with both wildlife and live stock. We were extremely fortunate that the weather cooperated throughout most of our drive. However, a series of incoming storms on March 5 provided me with ample resources for future painting projects. Here are a few scenes from our trip back to Columbus.

Farmland near Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 5, 2025.
Farmland near Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 5, 2025.
Cemetery near Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 5, 2025.

Cemetery near Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 5, 2025.
Cemetery near Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett on March 5, 2025.

My Fort Recovery project was to document the scenery collection and stage of the Adams Opera House (now known as the Morvilius Opera House), as well as lecture about the cultural and historical significance of the venue. That evening, I was scheduled to give a presentation to members from the opera house board, placing the original scenery, stage machinery (grooves), and lighting system (gas) within the context of local, regional, and national histories.

1883 with upper grooves for wings and shutters. Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Flat sheaves on the shutters at the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett, March 4, 2025.
Electric and gas footlights. Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein

Kaup and I had worked together for over a year. Last summer, she even attended my scenery preservation workshop at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mount Pleasant, Iowa – http://thetheatremuseum.com/.

Lorri Kaup and Grace Swank-Davis cleaning a historic drop at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mount Pleasant, Iowa. June 2024.
Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mount Pleasant, Iowa. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett, June 2024.

In Iowa, I instructed students in the cleaning and minor repair of painted settings. Richard Finkelstein was also on site at the time, documenting my process and artifacts throughout the museum. He later created a virtual tour of the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Richard Finkelstein and Jenny Knott joined me in Fort Recovery on March 4. We met at the opera house, then headed to document scenery in an off-site storage facility. Jenny was on her way to USITT where we were scheduled to teach the Paint Lab class “Foliage and Flowers: A Lesson in Color and Speed.”

Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Jenny Knott and Richard Finkelstein. March 4, 2025.

In Fort Recovery, Jenny and I photographed details and painting techniques, while Richard focused on the larger compositions (working his photographic “magic” once back home).

Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Jenny Knott documenting painting techniques in Fort Recovery, Ohio. March 4, 2025.

Much of the Morvilius scenery is currently stored at the Kaup’s warehouse where Lorri is not only cleaning the painted compositions, but also repairing some of the damaged fabric. Once the wings and shutters are cleaned and stabilized, I will be back to address paint preservation and other conservation tasks.

Here are a series of photographs from our site visit. Unless noted, all the images below were taken by Richard Finkelstein. Please credit his work if you use any of the images.

Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Proscenium arch detail, Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Painted detail from proscenium mural. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett, March 4, 2025.
House left side wall, Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. These murals were done at a later date (and by a different artist), but intended to match the proscenium mural. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
SL wings. The Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Lorri Kaup moving a profile piece, in the SR wings. The Morviliius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Roller for a drop curtain on the stage of the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio. Windows are all along the upstage wall, facing the street. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Sosman & Landis shutter painted for the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio, c. 1883. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Sosman & Landis shutters painted for the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio, c. 1883. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Sosman & Landis shutter painted for the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio, c. 1883. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein
Two Sosman & Landis shutters painted for the Morvilius Opera House in Fort Recovery Ohio, c. 1883. Site Survey by Richard Finkelstein during the early days of its restoration. Site visit was on March 4, 2025. This photo is by Richard Finkelstein.
Scenery collection from the Morvilius Opera House, currently stored off site in Fort Recovery, Ohio. Photograph by Wendy Waszut-Barrett, March 4, 2025.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Scenery Preservation Workshop at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana, June 4-5, 2024

Historic Stage Services, LLC, has partnered with the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana to offer scenery preservation workshops!

Here is the link for registration: http://thetheatremuseum.com/event/2-day-preservation-treatment-workshop

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Hugh Lanning’s Advertising Curtain at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

In 1905, Hugh Lanning painted an advertising curtain and stock scenery for the Blakesburg Opera House. Donated by Mr. and Mrs. Edward Fritz of Blakesburg, Iowa, it is currently on display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

1905 Ad drop by Hugh Lanning on display the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana. The top and side of the drop are folded over, so you cannot see the entire composition.

Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.

Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.

Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.

Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.

Painted detail from 1905 Hugh Lanning Ad Drop.

Lanning exemplifies the skilled scenic artist who diversified his work and never strayed far from home. He was born, raised, and died in Wapello County, Iowa.

Map showing Wapello County in relation to Omaha, Chicago, and Kansas City.

Map of Wapello County. Note that Blakesburg is on the western border.

By the way, if you want to learn more about the area, here is a link to the “History of Wapello County, “published in 1878. Here is the link: https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/public/gdcmassbookdig/historyofwapello00west/historyofwapello00west.pdf

For a brief time, Lanning was the area’s leading landscape and sign painter, dabbling in a variety of other artistic endeavors that included scene painting, side-show banners, and the decoration of mechanical equipment.

Suffering from a series of hardships, Lanning left only a modest legacy. It is remarkable that any of his artworks survive. Like many Midwestern artists, Lanning’s contributions quickly faded from theatre history.

It is only fitting that Lanning’s work is now on display at the Theatre Museum. He represents the thousands of scenic artists who never moved to a large city, rubbed elbows with theatrical elites, or made the “big time.” It certainly wasn’t because he lacked skills or ambition. In fact, Lanning reminds me of some advice passed down on my mom’s side of the family. Growing up, I was repeatedly told, “There are at least 10,000 people as talented as you; they just didn’t have the same opportunities.”  Over the years, this helped place my own work and life in perspective, making me appreciate those who contributed to theatre history, yet were never counted. Maybe that is why I am trying so hard to tell the stories of those who shaped the world of scenic art but are long forgotten.

Lanning leaves a legacy that encapsulates the careers of many rural scenic artists in the Midwestern United States. Those who gave so much to local communities and left life with very little fanfare.

Surprisingly, 43 years after Lanning’s passing, his advertising curtain was displayed at the Kennedy Center during a bicentennial exposition that celebrated two-hundred years of performing arts in America. In 1975, the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana loaned Lanning’s ad drop to be part of “America on Stage: 200 Years of the Performing Arts.” The year-long exhibition was free and open to the public every day from morning to night. Located on the Kennedy Center’s roof-terrace level, scenery, costumes, props, and other memorabilia were placed on display, borrowed from individuals and institutions all over the country. The primary focus of the exhibit was the evolution of American drama, music and dance from colonial times until the 1970s. If anyone attended this event and has documents to share, I would love to include them in this post.

The Kennedy Center exhibition was described by a visitor the “This ‘N That” section of The Bayard News. On March 25, 1976, an article reported, “Visited the bicentennial exhibit on the top floor of the Kennedy Center. Had heard it plugged on IEBN by Helen Hays. It is a review of entertainment in America. There was a Chautauqua tent in which you could see films on various subjects. There was a café-type setting with a Wurlitzer juke box. Hated to leave there for the juke box had records of my era…In a section devoted to traveling tent show, the famous Toby shows of the Schaeffers were prominent. The original family were great friends of Grace and Ralph Chapman and I’ve heard them talk about them…One wall displayed a very large stage curtain, it was full of ads advertising businesses in Ottumwa. Remember those things, painted in the most brazen colors, you could study them until the curtain was raised for the big show” (p. 2). They were describing Lanning’s ad drop.  In many ways, he represents the 99% of scenic artists who never gained national reputations.

Here is the story of Hugh I. Lanning (1853-1933), Stage and Side Show Painter of Ottumwa, Iowa.

Signature on Blakesburg Opera House Ad Drop.

Signature and date on Blakesburg Opera House.

Lanning’s family tree is bit complicated due to his father’s multiple marriages and offspring. So many young women died in childbirth in the mid-nineteenth century, leaving grieving husbands with small children.

Hugh Lanning was the one of two children born to David Cornelius Lanning (1826-1907) and Nancy Connelly (1831-1862). Nancy was David’s second wife. The couple was married on Sept. 4, 1850, in Wapello County, Iowa. This was almost three years after the passing of David’s first wife, Amelia Ann O’Neil Lanning (1820-1847). David’s first marriage took place in Ripley, Illinois, on Sept. 12, 1844.

The 1850 Census report listed David and his second wife, Nancy, living with two children from David’s first marriage: Sarah Agnes Lanning (1845-1927) and David Columbus Lanning (1847-1913).  That year, the Lanning family lived in Ripley, Brown County, Illinois. Interestingly, Nancy was counted twice in the census. She was also listed as part of her parents’ home in Wapello County, Iowa (Hugh & Martha Connelly).

Hugh Lanning was born on April 27, 1853, in Agency Township, Iowa, with his birth registered in Wapello County. Lanning’s younger sister, Mary Alice Lanning was born the following year.

The 1856 Iowa State Census listed the Lanning family living approximately ten miles southeast of Ottumwa, still in Agency Township. The Lanning household included David, Nancy, Sarah A., Hugh, and Martha. In both the 1850 and 1856 census reports, David Lanning was listed as a cooper.

I was surprised to see that David Jr. was not listed as part of the household. It is possible, that he had already been “hired out”; such was the case with my maternal grandfather at the turn-of-the-twentieth century. As soon as a child was old enough to work, they were hired out to another family with their subsequent “wages” sent home. This is basically leasing a child.

The Lanning family began to financially fail by the late 1850s. On Dec. 8, 1859, David Lanning was listed in the Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier as delinquent in his taxes for three lots in Agency City (p. 2).

I have yet to locate any listing for the Lanning family in the 1860 US Federal Census. However, David and Nancy Lanning celebrated the birth of their third child that year. Emma J. Lanning was born in Ohio.  I am uncertain as to whether the Lannings temporarily relocated to Ohio, or were visiting when Emma was born. When Nancy Lanning passed away on Feb. 20, 1862, however, the Lannings were again living in Wapello County.

David remarried his third wife, Harriett Elizabeth Criswell/Creswell (1842-1872) on December 3, 1862. The couple celebrated the birth of Mary Ella Lanning (1863-1920), James Lanning (1865-1921), and William Robert Lanning (1869-1918).

I have yet to track down the Lanning family in the 1860 Census, however, David and Harriet celebrated the birth of Emma J. Lanning in Ohio that year. The Lanning family may have temporarily moved back east. They were back in Iowa by the onset of the Civil War. In 1862, David Lanning was listed as a person subject to military duty in Iowa Records. I have yet to uncover anything about the Lanning family’s activities during the remainder of the 1860s, however, the were still in Wapello county in 1870.  

The 1870 US Federal Census listed the Lanning family living in Center Township, Wapello County, Iowa. In 1878, David Lanning was listed as a farmer in “History of Wapello County. He owned Sec. 27 in Agency Township.” James Lanning, also listed as a farmer in 1878, owned Sec. 30 in Agency Township. That year, B. F. Watson was listed as a local painter. It is possible that Lanning apprenticed with Watson. At 38 yrs. old, David Lanning was now employed as a carpenter, with 17-yrs.-old Hugh listed as a laborer. Other members of the Lanning household in 1870 included Hugh’s step-mother Harriet (27 yrs.), Emma J. (10 yrs.), Mary E. (7 yrs.), James (4 yrs.), and Willie (1 yr.). By this time, Lanning’s two oldest children had already married. Sarah A. Lanning was living in Macon, Illinois with her husband, Joseph Fry, and 2-yrs.-old daughter, Elda. David Lanning Jr. was also living in Illinois, recently married to Eliza Mryess.

It is a complicated genealogy, with David Lanning purportedly marrying two more times after the passing of his third wife; L. C. Royce on Dec. 29, 1880, and Sarah Wertz on July 15, 1886. Both marriages were in Wapello County.

I have yet to identify when Hugh Lanning began his work as a painter or attempted his first theatrical project. The 1870s were certainly a decade a transition as he left his parents home, married and celebrated the birth of his first child. Hugh married Josephine “Josie” Rush (b. 1855) in Brown, Illinois, in 1876. Over the years, the couple celebrated the birth of three children:

Hugh Antonio “Tony” Lanning (1877-1947)

David Nelson Lanning (1881-1958)

Fanchon Lanning (1886-1968)

In 1878, their home was destroyed by a tornado. At the time, the Lanning family was living northeast of Ottumwa in Dahlonega township. This community had formerly been known as Shellbark. In 1856 the town boasted three hundred residents, with two packing houses, schoolhouse, public hall, and numerous businesses.

On June 6, 1878, the Buffalo Courier Express described a tornado’s deadly path that destroyed Lanning’s home:

”Still Another. A Destructive Tornado in Iowa the Day After One in Missouri.

Ottumwa, Iowa, June 3, – A terrible tornado took place here on yesterday, about 4 o’clock P. M., originating about two miles north of the city, striking city limits on the north and northeast, and thence passing in a southeasterly direction between Eldon and Batavia, avoiding Agency City…Thence the storm passed to the frame house of Hugh Lanning, a painter, one mile and a half further on. Mr. Lanning and his wife were not in the house and thus saved their lives, as their house, a frame cottage, was torn to pieces, scattering their earthly possessions, and carrying pieces of the timber and small pieces of the furniture ten miles beyond…”

On June 6, 1878, The Oskaloosa Herald reported, “The residence of Hugh Lanning was picked up from the foundation turned around three or four times and crushed like an eggshell on the ground, Of the contents of the house only three or four chairs have been found unbroken. No one luckily was at home” (p. 3).

Lanning remained in the area, but the process of rebuilding one’s home meant that Lanning did not stray far from the area. The 1880 US Federal Census still listing the Lanning home in Dahlonega with Hugh working as a painter.  His employment as a scenic artist did not make news until 1882 when he painted some circus banners.  On Aug. 6, 1882, the Ottumwa Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning has some fine specimens of scene painting in his shop, nearly completed, for Batcheller & Doris’ show. The painting is first class, and a decided credit to Mr. Lanning” (p. 4).  That year, Batcheller & Doris were travelling with their “Great Inter-Ocean Show.” On Aug. 16, 1882, The Columbus Journal (Nebraska) reported, “Batcheller & Doric have, without question, the finest circus that ever visited Burlington, and have more real attractions than any other circus on the road; chief among which is Millie Christian, the two0headed girl, who can truthfully be called the eighth wonder of then world” (p. 3). That summer, Batcheller & Doris’ show included several stops in Iowa, also making news upriver in Oskaloosa.

https://www.searchablemuseum.com/the-life-and-travels-of-millie-christine-mccoy

The show was also advertised as Batcheller & Doris’ Mammoth Aggregation. On August 11, 1882, Nebraska’s Lincoln Journal Star described, “Batcheller & Doris’ Mammoth Aggregation is in reality the combination of a half dozen shows…there is no circus now in the world that presents such varied and first-class ring performance, every artist being bright and particular star in his or her line of business, and commanding salaries that twenty years ago would have been deemed fabulous” (p. 2). 1882 feature acts included: Mlle. Rosina Dubsky, the Hungarian equestrienne; Miss Lizzie Keyes, the American rider; Aberlando Dowanda, the Brazillian equestrian; Willie Shanles, champion hurdle rider; the three Russian Athletes, acrobatics; Milo Brothers, gymnasts; Mlle. Eltre, contortionist; Mlle. Adele, trapeze artist; Prince Salsuma, balancing act; and Prof. Parker, dog act. The circus traveled all over the country between 1881 and 1882. On Jun 5, 1882, The Times of Streator, Illinois, reported, “There are 260 persons on the payroll of the Batcheller & Doris Co.” (p. 4).

Lanning continued to pick up a variety of work. He also became known for his easel art. That fall, Lanning exhibited some of his artworks at the 1882 Agricultural Fair in Agency City. The fairgrounds were within one block of the depot. Lanning was one of the listed attractions.  On Oct. 4, 1882, the Ottumwa Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning has staked his tent, in which he has a fine art museum, exhibiting many fine specimens of the art of painting, of which Mr. Lanning is one of the most proficient in this country” (p. 4). On Oct. 5, 1882, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “Hugh Lanning has an art gallery that is really worth going to see, and when you are down there go and see his pictures. There is much to admire and nothing to offend” (p. 4).

Lanning’s work extended to panorama exhibits for local events that included a Turner’s Fair. On Jan. 21, 1885, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “One of the attractions of the evening was the panorama which Mr. Hugh Lanning had kindly put in position for the occasion. His Punch and Judy performance also furnished an unlimited amount of merriment for the many children present” (p. 3).

Tragically, Lannings sister at this same time, with news reaching Ottumwans on Jan. 28. The Ottumwa Daily Democrat announced, “Miss Mattie Lanning, now Mrs. Lee Traul, dies of consumption on Jan. 20 in Macon, Illinois” (p. 3). This was Martha Alice Lanning, Hugh’s younger sister.

By the end of the 1880s, Hugh Lanning moved his family to Ottumwa where he established a scenic studio on the south side of town. His two sons would follow in his footsteps, working at his shop. On 20 Jun 1888, the Ottumwa Weekly Democrat reported, “During a visit to the South Side yesterday a reporter called at the studio of the scenic artist Hugh Lanning, and found this favorite of Ottumwa art lovers hard at work on a number of landscape scenes ordered from different parts of the country, six of which go to Red Oak, and all gems of their kind. He also has on hand commenced an immense sign for the Golden Eagle clothing house which will be one of the finest signs in Iowa. Mr. Lanning is decidedly the finest scenic artist that ever came to our city and deserves to be liberally patronized” (p. 3)

The next year, Lanning’s artistic diversity was advertised in local news. On May 14, 1889, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning, the painter, does frescoing, sign painting, wood engraving. Scene-painting, etc. Mr. Lanning did the scene work in the Turner opera house, and there is no better artist in Iowa. We understand he will be a bidder for the scene work in the new opera house to be built in this city, and we trust he will secure the contract. If you want any painting done, give Mr. Lanning a call” (p. 3). Like many scenic artists at this time, the key to success was a willingness to paint whatever project came your way. In the case of Lanning, it was a combination of touring show scenery, local signage, residential decoration, and easel art. The wood engraving was unique, but not a surprise when considering his father’s carpentry work.

Lanning’s business was thriving at the turn-of-the-twentieth century. He was listed as one of many business owners involved with the Ottumwa Street Carnival in 1900 (Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier  23 Aug 1900, p. 4). By now, Lanning’s two sons were working alongside him, also employed as painters, and living at 907 Church Street. Hugh’s wife was also listed as a dressmaker in the 1901 Ottumwa Directory. The whole family seemed to be gainfully employed and succeeding.

As with many scenic artists at this time Lanning embraced new technology, investing in new forms of entertainment. He began with stereopticon shows, even touring nearby small towns with his act. On Jan. 2, 1902, the Ottumwa Semi Weekly Courier announced, “Hugh Lanning gave a stereopticon show at Bear Creek Monday” (p. 8). Lanning provided a similar entertainment for members of Ottumwa’s Carpenters Union, No, 767. On Jan. 14, 1902, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “The evening’s program was furnished by High Lanning and consisted of moving pictures and gramophone music, or unusual merit and much was appreciated by all” (p. 4). On March 19, 9102,the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning gave an entertainment last evening at the Woodmen of the World hall, which was well attended. The entertainment was given under the auspices of the Northwestern Fraternal Reserve” (p. 4).  That spring, Lanning also took his entertainment on the road to. On March 26,1902, the Ottumwa Daily Democrat reported, “Hugh Lanning and the Stoops brothers left this morning for Moravia where they will give a moving picture and gramophone entertainment this evening. Before returning to Ottumwa they will give entertainments at Centerville, Mystic, Blakesburg and other points and expect to be gone about two weeks” (p. 4).

Just when the sky seemed the limit for Lanning, tragedy struck when Josie Lanning fell. She never fully recovered from the incident, and her health continued to decline. On May 6, 1903, the Ottumwa Daily Courier announced, “Mrs. Hugh Lanning is very ill at her home, 907 Church St.” On May 27, 1904, the Ottumwa Evening Democrat announced, “Mrs. Hugh Lanning is dangerously ill at her home on Church Street as the result of a fall she sustained some time ago” (p. 2). She passed away the next year. On June 17, 1905, Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier “Death of Mrs. Lanning. After a lingering illness, death came to Mrs. Josie Lanning, wife of Hugh Lanning, this morning at 12:20 o’clock at the family residence, 907 Church Street. The deceased is survived by her husband, two sons, H. A. Lanning and N. D. Lanning, and one daughter” (p. 4).

This was the same year that Hugh Lanning painted an advertising and stock scenery collection for the Blakesburg Opera House. In fact, Lanning was working at the Blakesburg Opera House when his daughter visited that fall. On Sept. 19, 1905, the Ottumwa Semi-Weekly Courier, announced, “Miss Fanchon Lanning, 907 Church Street, left on the Milwaukee this morning for Blakesburg, where she will visit her father Hugh Lanning” (p. 8).

For the next few years, Lanning drifted along, varying his work and seldom making news. It was as if his heart was no longer in the game.

On May 9, 1907, The Oskaloosa Herald reported, “Painting the Summer Cars.

The summer equipment of the Traction & Light Co. is being rapidly repainted and overhauled in every way. The work is being done by Hugh Lanning, an expert painter from Ottumwa, and some of his decorations on the cars, which are all hand work, are quite handsome. The cars will be put to use as soon as the work is completed” (p. 7). Lanning briefly relocated to Center, Iowa, where he worked as a sign painter. The 1910 US Federal Census listed that he was still living with his 23 yrs. old daughter that year. He returned to Ottumwa by 1912, where he was listed in the “Painters and Paperhangers” section of the City Directory, still working as a sign painter and now living at 524 Church.”

Over the next few years, Lanning’s named popped up here and there without much fanfare. One 1914 notice announced that he was selected was selected for jury duty. Another indicated his association with the Socialist party. The direction of Lanning’s painting projects during this time shifted toward residential decor. On Feb. 18, 1915, the Ottumwa Tri-Weekly Courier announced, “Hon. P. G. Ballingall has erected on top of his five-cent lunch house, a panoramic view that is immense. He must have got his idea for it in some oriental country during his trips around the world. Like the woman’s calico dress it must have been ‘pretty costive’ Hugh Lanning was the artist who executed it” (p. 2). This is the last article that I have located about Lanning’s work.  What once seemed a promising career simply faded away after World War I.

By 1920, Lanning was living with his daughter, Fanchon, son-in-law, Ed Schworm, and granddaughters, Patricia Ann and Betty. He remained at the Schworm home there until his passing. His last work as a scene and sign painter purportedly occurred in 1931.

Lanning passed away on Sept. 8, 1933. The cause of his death was listed as myocarditis; senility was considered a contributing cause.

Lanning’s obituary was published in the Ottumwa Courier on Sept. 9, 1933:

“Hugh Lanning, Sr., 80 years old, died at 401 McKinley avenue at 6 p.m. Friday. He was born in Agency township, the son of David and Nancy Lanning, April 27, 1853. In 1876 he was married to Josephine Rush. She preceded him in death in 1905. Since that time he has made his home with his daughter, Mrs. Ed M. Schworm. For many years, Mr. Lanning was a leading landscape and sign painter here. He has lived practically all his life in Ottumwa. Surviving are two sons, H.A. Lanning of Battle Creek, Mich., and N.D. Lanning of Chicago; one daughter, Mrs. Schworm of Ottumwa; three grandsons, five granddaughters and one great-grandson. Funeral services will be held Monday at 2 p.m. at the Schworm residence. The Rev. O.B. Preston, pastor of the Plymouth Congregational church will officiate. Burial will be in Shaul cemetery. The body was removed to the Johnson funeral chapel and will be returned to the home, Monday morning.”

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Harry Dressel Scenery Collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

The oldest scenery collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana was painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.

Two shutter covers painted by Harry Dressel in 1875 for Steyer’s Opera House, Decorah, Iowa. They are now part of the Harry Dressel Collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.

Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.

Painted detail from SL shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.

Painted detail from SR shutter cover, painted by Harry Dressel in 1875.

I examined two cottage shutter covers during my visit last month. They were once part of a stock scenery collection at Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa. The scenery was donated through the efforts of Dr. George D. Glenn and Richard Poole, authors of “The Opera Houses of Iowa.” Theatre Museum records indicate that some of the Steyer’s Opera House scenery was placed on display in 2001. When I visited the museum in 2017, the cottage shutters were still on display.

SL shutter cover on display at the Theatre Museum in 2017.

In 1989, Glenn even made a 12 ½ minute documentary about the extant scenery, lighting, and stage machinery, entitled “Steyer’s Opera House.” Here is the YouTube link to the 1989 video: https://youtu.be/r_2l6pGmp3A?si=31RV5ShRr2lSka_w

In 1989 the third-floor opera house was an 1875 time-capsule of stage technology. At the time, it was possibly the oldest extant stage boasting an original 1875 scenery and stage machinery installation in North America.

Image from George Glenn’s 1989 movie that shows the state of Steyer’s Opera House when he first visited the stage.

As is the case with many historic stages, new building owners, investors, and other stakeholders fail to understand the significance of what they have, especially stage artifacts. Fortunately, some of the scenes were transported to the Theatre Museum.

I know of only one older scenic piece in North America – a front curtain painted by Russell Smith for the Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina (1858).

1858 Front curtain by Russell Smith on display in the Thalian Hall lobby in Wilmington, North Carolina in 2019.

Painted detail, 1858 Thalian Hall front curtain by Russell Smith. Wilmington, North Carolina.

Painted detail, 1858 Thalian Hall front curtain by Russell Smith. Wilmington, North Carolina.

To my knowledge, the Steyer’s Opera House contained the oldest collection of stage scenery, machinery, lighting equipment, “as delivered” until the 21st century.  It still signifies some of the the oldest examples of signed American scenic art.

Signature on the front of Steyer’s Opera House SR Cottage shutter.

The second oldest examples are 1888 wing-and-shutter scenery signed by Frank Cox for the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. Amazingly, Dressel signed the front of the shutters. Cox signed the back.

Frank Cox signature. Tree profile at the Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.

The Theatre Museum’s Dressel collection signifies the oldest extant example of stock scenery delivered to an American opera house. In addition to age, the creator of Steyer’s Opera House scenery was internationally recognized as an extremely skilled scenic artist. Dressel’s scenic art made news from Toronto to New Orleans in the nineteenth century.

Here is the tale of Henry “Harry” Dressel.

Henry Dressel was the fifth child born to F. Ludwig “Louis” Dressel (1817-) and Sophie Schmidt (1820-1899) in Hanover, Germany. In 1858, the Dressel family boarded a ship in Bremen and sailed for America. On Oct. 22, 1858, they arrived in Philadelphia aboard the Brig Amazone. The ship’s manifest listing Ludwig Dressel (40 yrs. cooper), Sophie (38 yrs.), Marie (15 yrs.), Christian (13 yrs.), George (9 yrs.), William (7 ½ yrs.), Henry (6 yrs.), Louise (5 yrs.), and Adolph (3 mths.).

Ship’s manifest with the Dressel family’s arrival in Philadelphia. Oct. 22, 1858.

The family soon settled in Chicago where Louis Dressel listed his established trade as cooper in the City Directory. Although the family initially lived in a boarding house on Kinzie, they soon secured permanent lodging at 227 N. Franklin.  Dressel transitioned from cooper to a rectifier for Theodore Kraefft. Kraefft who not only sold wines and liquors (77 S. Water St.) but also operated a distillery (329 N. Wells St.). Dressel remained with the firm for some time; accepting whatever job came his way, continuing with the firm as it transitioned from Kraefft & Co. to Kraefft, Roelle & Co.

In 1870, the Dressel family were still living at their home on N. Franklin. However, Louis and William were now operating a retail grocery store, Dressel & Son. Meanwhile, Harry Dressel was listed as a fresco painter, boarding at 298 N. Franklin.

While examining the 1870 Census report another name caught me eye – Fest. Living next door to 18 yrs. old Harry was the 19 yrs. old painter Oscar Fest. Fest was only a few months older than Dressel, having been born on Aug. 10, 1852, in Breslau, Germany. Fest and his parents had emigrated in 1853, five years before the Dressels.

In 1870, Fest was also living with his parents on N. Franklin. Both Harry Dressel and Oscar Fest started as decorative painters and later each became incredibly well-known scenic artists; Dressel in New Orleans and Fest in San Francisco. Both of their fathers had worked as coopers. It would have been quite unusual if the two families were not close. It would be uncommon for either Fest or Dressel to have apprenticed as painters after the age of 16. This means that their entrance into the painting profession occurred about 1867. Fest is even listed in the 1867 Chicago Directory a painter.

Both young men may have begun their artistic careers with Robert W. Hanington. Hanington was a wire shade and decorative artist who lived just up the street at 296 N. Franklin. Again, the first listing for Dressel as a fresco painter lists his residence as 298 N. Franklin.

North Franklin street was destroyed by the great fire of 1871. The Dressel family immediately rebuilt their home and continued to live in the area. After all, both their home and grocery business had been in North Franklin when flames swept through in 1871.

Just before the great Chicago Fire of 1871, Dressel began working as a scenic artist for the Globe Theater. Although he was listed in the 1872 Chicago Directory as a fresco painter, he was also listed as scenic artist for Chicago’s Globe Theatre that year.

His link to the Globe was advertised during the tour of Alderson’s Panorama that summer. Newspaper advertisements for the Chicago Fire Panorama listed four contributing artists for the 3,700 sq. ft. painting: one designer and three Chicago-based scenic artists:

Henry Cross of the Academy of Design

J. Howard Rogers, scenic artist of McVicker’s Theatre

Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of Wood’s Museum

Henry Dressel, scenic artist of the Globe Theatre

I believe that Dressel first worked as an assistant to Rogers and Tryon at the Globe Theater when it opened in 1870. The Globe Theatre was initially referred to as the West Side Theatre, with Allen being the first proprietor and lessee of the place (The Chicago Evening Mail 31 Oct. 1870, p. 4). The great fire did not destroy the Globe Theatre, although it came close; crossing the river just a few blocks south. Despite many scenic artist’s losing their homes and employment, those at the Globe were fortunate. It is very likely that the Chicago Fire panorama was painted by Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel at the Globe Theatre.

Map showing the Globe Theatre in relation to the river and burned district.

On Nov. 21, 1870, the Chicago Tribune advertised the opening of “Allen’s Globe Theatre, Des Plaines Street, West side, between Washington and Madison Streets” (p. 4). The announcement credited the Globe’s new scenery and drop curtain to Messrs. James Howard Rogers, John M. Kauffman, and Henry C. Tryon. Kaufmann relocated to Cincinnati by 1874, where he continued working as a scenic artist at local theaters for the remainder of the 19th century.

Portrait of Henry C. Tryon in 1886.

Of this grouping, Roger’s was the premiere artist of the group, with his scenic art solely mentioned in many articles. For example. On Nov. 22, 1870, the Chicago Tribune described, “The decorations of the auditorium are simple, but in great good taste, and the scenic artist, Mr. James Howard Rogers, has put forth his entire artistic skill in getting up the scenes, all of which are of real excellence. In the drop curtain Mr. Rogers has boldly departed from the eternal Lake of Como with its dreadfully Italian sky, etc.; and has drawn his inspiration from home. The picture represents the progress of civilization. It is a beautiful Western scene, composed of lake and mountains, a railroad train – the emblem of advancing civilization – crossing a bridge, and away to the westward, the Indian, with his bow and arrows, receding before it, and following his own setting sun. At the front of the curtain appears the inscription, “Westward the course of empire takes its flight” (p. 4). This article made it seem that Rogers painted everything by himself. Rogers was living in the city, however, as he was listed in the 1870 Chicago Directory: “Howard Rogers, scene painter, r. 34 Price pl.” The listing forgot to include the “J” in front of Howard Rogers.

Rogers maintained a close connection with the Globe, as his wife worked there in 1871. On Feb. 17, 1871, The Chicago Evening Mail announced, “Sick – Mrs. J. Howard Rogers, of Allen’s Globe Theatre, has for the last few days been extremely ill. Until yesterday, it was feared that she would not recover. She is better today” (p. 4).

It is important to remember that scenic art assistants were seldom credited in these theatrical endeavors.   When both Tryon and Kauffman were credited, it was as legitimate contributors, not as assistants. Other articles solely credit Rogers as he boasted the biggest reputation at the time. Pot boys or scenic art assistants were never mentioned in metropolitan news.

D. R. Allen’s management of the Globe Theatre was short-lived, ending early in 1871. There were a series of mechanics’ liens against the Globe property, with Col. J. H. Wood listed as proprietor in 1872. On January 25, 1872, the Chicago Tribune even referred to the venue was called Wood’s Globe Theatre, after Colonel Wood’s Museum Company at the Globe (p. 4).

Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel painted Alderson’s Great Panorama of the Chicago fire early in 1872 so it could tour that summer. They worked from primary sketches by Academy of Design instructor, Henry C. Cross.

Chicago before the fire. Link to image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire#/media/File:1871_Chicago_view_before_the_Great_Conflagration.jpg

Photographs by George N. Barnard after the conflagration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire#/media/File:Attributed_to_George_N._Barnard_-_Untitled_(Chicago_after_the_Chicago_Fire)_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

Their work immediately toured the country, accompanied with musical performances and descriptive recitations. By late July the panorama was exhibited at Piatt’s Music Hall in San Francisco. Several advertisements for the panorama were placed in Figaro. This newsletter referred to itself as “the organ of amusement….circulates in….All the Theatres and is Circulated Every Day in the Year Generally Throughout the City and on the Boats and Cars.” Figaro stated that its newsletter was “published every Day in the Year by J. P. Bogardus at 22 Merchant and 535 Washington Streets, Below Montgomery, San Francisco.”

Advertisement for Alderson’s Panorama in Figaro, 1871.

Another advertisement for Alderson’s Panorama in Figaro, 1871.

Although the digital scan of newsletter is quite poor, Figaro is a wealth of information about theatrical activities in San Francisco during the second half of 1872. Here is a link to those who may be interested: https://archive.org/stream/figarojulydec18700unse/figarojulydec18700unse_djvu.txt

The same advertisement was placed in Figaro announcements for several days. The article consistently reported,  

Panorama of the Great Chicago Fire.

Alderson’s Panorama of the Great Chicago Fire has arrived and will be exhibited in Piatt’s Hall on Friday evening next. This painting covers over thirty-seven hundred feet of canvas was executed from actuals views and drawings by Henry C. Cross of the Academy of Design; J. Howard Rogers, scenic artist of McVicker’s Theatre; Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of Wood’s Museum; Henry Dreissel [sic.], scenic artist of the Globe Theatre, and Thomas Megann, scenic artist of Crosby’s Opera House. The mechanical appointments are by the celebrated John Faust of Dearborn Theater and Opera House, all famous artists in their line. The panorama represents Chicago before the fire, the city in flames, and afterwards the ruins. Other sections present views of the old cemetery, with its scenes of suffering representations of the public buildings, printing offices, and water works of prominent places. Succeeding these, are views of the ruins of the churches, the exhibition closing with the ruins of the Masonic Temple by moonlight. A lady of Chicago will deliver a descriptive lecture, interspersed with appropriate ballads, anecdotes, and incidents. This approaches the anniversary of this dreadful event which took place October 8th and 9th, recalls the horrifying scenes to memory, and these will be found faithfully depicted in the great panorama. The process of admission have been fixed at the low rates of 50 cents and 25 cents, and on Sunday afternoon a matinee will be given at half prices.” (Daily Figaro, San Francisco, 31 July 1872, page 1).  Some of the advertisements included a listing of various scenes:

“Chicago before the Fire; The Conflagration; Thousands of Houses in Flames; The Scenes of the Old Cemetery; The Ruins; Views of Principal Streets; Public Buildings, Printing Offices, etc.; Ruins of the Churches; Something About Mrs. O’Leary’s Cow; Music, Songs, Stories, Recitations; and Descriptive Lecture and Dramatic Ballad by a Lady of Chicago

Chicago” (Figaro 31 July 1872, p. 1).

One of many articles in Figaro describing the panorama in 1871.

Alderson’s panorama was one of many panorama’s depicting the tragedy that toured in the country at the time. Frank D. Skiff formed, Skiff & Co., to create another panorama of the Chicago Fire. The work was credited as “the work of scenic artist Frank D. Skiff, the well-known scenic artist” (Chicago Tribune 17 Dec 1871, p. 7).

Dressel’s early scenic art career mimics that of many during the early 1870s. Aspiring artists secured work as decorative painters. This employment brought them into director contact with other decorative artists who worked as scenic artists at theaters. In most cases, scenic artists were paid a higher salary, but the work was more sporadic.

Portrait of P. M. Almini

One example of an artist who bridged the decorative and scenic art worlds was Louis Malmsha. Malmsha not only worked for the decorative firm of Jevne & Almini (later known as P. M. Almini & Co.), but also worked at McVicker’s Theatre. Malmsha is the common thread between several scenic artists working in Chicago during the 1870s. For example, both Rogers and Tryon worked with Malmsha at McVicker’s in 1871. This is the year after Rogers and Tryon painted scenery for the Allen’s Globe Theater.

At this time, if a young artist showed promise, he was immediately brought into the theatrical fold. The demand for scenic art was greater than the supply of scenic artists.

Portrait of Thomas G. Moses in 1886.

Thomas G. Moses is another example of a young man who worked as Malmsha’s assistant in 1873, both at Almini’s and McVicker’s in 1873. Both Moses and Tryon ended up as Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio employees by the early 1880s.

When considering Dressel’s entry into the scenic art profession, his initial training was in Chicago before the Great Fire. The 1871 tragedy meant that many scenic artists left the city, as they were left without work. Many, such as Malmsha relocated to other metropolitan areas. There was a waiting period before new stages were constructed for popular entertainment. Others produced painted spectacles that toured, such as the Chicago Fire panoramas. Rogers, Tryon, and Dressel had worked together in the past, and therefore teamed up to paint Cross’ design.

Dressel was touring with the Tannehill Company at the beginning of 1872. He was listed as part of the company, as well at the scenic artist.

I need to provide some context for Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill concerning the time when Dressel joined their troupe. In 1872, they sporadically performed on stages along the eastern seaboard. Their young daughter, Birdie, even joined them on some occasions. On June 13, 1872, The Valley Virginian of Staunton, Virginia, reported:

“AMUSEMENTS. Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill, assisted by their infant daughter, “Birdie,” only five years old, will give one of their chaste, beautiful and intellectual PARLOR ENTERTAINMENTS, at the Town Hall, on Tuesday evening, June 18th. They are well and favourably known and remembered by our citizens, as the leading members of the ‘Old Reliable Company’ when here last Winter. Those who desire to witness a legitimate performance, will be more compensated by attending (p. 3).

Birdie passed away in the spring of 1873.

On March 11, 1873, the “Deaths” section of the Staunton Spectator announced, “At 125, Simcoe Street, Toronto, Canada, on Monday, March 3rd, little Birdie, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Tannehill, aged 5 years and 6 months.

Farewell parents, lay me gently

In my little narrow bed.

Think of God who gave and took me;

Now I slumber with the dead,

F. S. M.” (p. 3).

Birdie died from Typhoid Fever in Toronto.

Less than a year later, tragedy struck again in Toronto. This is how I connected scenic artist Harry Dressel with the Tannehill company.

An announcement in The Hamilton Spectator on Feb. 8, 1874, announced:

“FIRE! FIRE! FIRE!

In consequence of the Royal Lyceum, Toronto, burning down, the Company will play a short season at St. James Hall, commencing Monday, Feb 9. The Troupe consisted of the following first-class Artists:

F. A. Tannehill, Manager, Chas. Webster, Wm. Fuller, Wm. Ford, Dick Fowler, Nellie Tannehill, Nellie Stanwood, Mrs. Bradshaw, H. B. Bell, Burton Adams, J. R. Masters, Dick Featherstone, Harry Booth, Harry Dressel, Virginia Buchanan.

Harry Dressel was also listed as scenic artist, with W. Fordham as stage conductor.

The following pieces will be put on stage with new scenery, properties and machinery:

Ticket of Leave Man

Streets of New York

Dora

Colleen Bawn

Pat’s Trouble

Under the Gaslight”

On January 31, 1874, The Hamilton Spectator reported, “The Theater was insured in different offices to the extent of about $12,000, and was owned by Mr. French, by whom it had lately been leased to Mr. Tannehill. This is the third time the building has been attacked by fire, and it has at last succumbed to its assailant. The origin of the fire has not been ascertained, but it is supposed that it commenced in the carpenter’s shop, which being stored with paint, wood, shavings and other flammable material, caused it to spread with such unaccountable rapidity” (p. 2).

I remain unsure as to when Dressel joined the Tannehill company, or how long he toured with the group. I have yet to locate any other articles mentioning Dressel’s scenic prior to the summer of 1875. That year, Harry became the scenic artist for the Varieties Theater in New Orleans, Louisiana. There is no doubt that his association with the Tannehills would have improved his chances in the region. Mr. Tannehill had made quite a name for himself in southern theaters after the Civil War, especially Memphis. Initially, Dressel was hired to both paint and retouch scenery.

On Oct. 31, 1875, The New Orleans Democrat reported, “Amusements. The Varieties Theater. – The amusement season at this favorite theater will be inaugurated to-morrow evening by the first appearance in this city of Grau and Chizzola’s admirable French Opera Bouffe Company in the late operatic novelty of Gorofle-Gizolla. The opera itself is spoken of a Lecocq’s greatest triumph, and the critics of the New York press have been lavish in their praises of its merit. During the summer the theater has been carefully renovated, and Mr. Harry Dressel, and eminent scenic artist, has been busily engaged for some time past in retouching old scenes and painting many entirely new ones, all of which are characterized by beauty of design and delicacy of touch, and color.” (p. 8).

After his initial work at the Varieties Theatre, Dressel headed north and painted stock scenery for Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa. On Dec. 9, 1875, the Chicago Weekly Post and Mail published, “Special Correspondence of THE POST and Mail. Decorah, Iowa, Dec. 3” (p. 3). The article continued:

“Prominent among the improvements is the enlargement of the Steyer Opera House, with a general overhauling, such as reseating with chairs, enlarged gallery, costly and fine scenery (painted by Harry Dressel, formerly of your city), and with a capacity of about 1,100 persons. Rudolph’s Music Hall has also undergone a similar change. About ninety buildings have been erected, among them some fine business blocks and residences, at a cost of over $150,000. Amusements are thick, A panorama ‘busted’ here a few weeks ago, and the operators went back to their legitimate business, and Jo Steyer, of the Opera House, has a ‘show’ on his hands. Plunkett’s troupe played crowded houses for a week recently, presenting ‘Two Orphans.’ Decorah promises to be lively in the way of amusements this winter.”

“Two Orphans” was a popular production in 1875. It was also featured at the Varieties Theatre in New Orleans that year, with Dressel painting the scenes. On Dec. 2, 1875, the New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Harry Dressel, the able scenic artist of the theater, has been for a long-time preparing scenes especially for this play” (p. 8). On Dec. 4, 1875, The New Orleans Bulletin further elaborated on the production and Dressel’s scenic contribution:

Elegant Scenery.

“The Two Orphans” at the Varieties.

No matter what the intrinsic beauty of strength of a drama may be, it is in the power of the scenic artist of the theater to greatly make or mar the play as a popular production. No drama is so good that it can be entirely independent of scenic accessories, and upon the artist who creates the scene it devolves to fitly picture the playwright’s ideal of situation and locality. We were led to these reflections by the sight was of the elaborate and artistic scenery which seen Thursday evening at The Varieties Theater in the play of “Two Orphans.” We have rarely witnessed more exquisite productions of the artist’s pencil. The snow scene, in which the very excellent portion of the drama is produced, was one of the most charming and life-like it has even been our good fortune to see; the floor of the stage seemed covered with beautiful snow and had not lain upon it long enough to lose its soft appearance, and had just been there sufficient time to gain a silver shimmer, which made it exquisitely delicate and charmingly picturesque. The beautiful garden and the palace of Belair was almost like a fairy picture in its beauty, and yet not to fanciful to be real. The entire front of the magnificent palace beautifully illuminated; a large and elegant terrace, lighted by handsome chandeliers, and opening upon a lovely garden, presented and elegant scene rarely if ever equaled here on the stage. The picture of the noble’s mansion and the beggar’s hovel were alike truthful and appropriate. Aside from the intrinsic merit of the play, and it is full of admirable points, the scenery should be seen by every lover of the artistic and beautiful in our city; it affords a rare treat and should be seen by all.  Harry Dressel, the artist of the theater, deserves the highest praise for his great success” (p. 1).

His scenic work for “Two Orphans” was still being heralded at the beginning of 1876. On Jan. 16, The New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist of the theater, wields a pencil in a way that commands the earnest applause of all judges of true artistic ability, and the scenes in the play, when first presented at this theater, evoked the warmest praise for their real intrinsic merit” (p. 1).

Dressel quickly made a name for himself in New Orleans, repeatedly appearing in local headlines. I am amazed at the amount of press Dressel received for his work, as there was ample work in New Orleans that year; enough to keep several scenic artists employed at multiple theaters, including Anthony Bagnette, Thomas Burke, Angelo Wiser, and William T. Porter.

Fortunately for Dressel, he immediately secured the scenic art position at the Varieties Theater. By December 1875, the venue was leased and managed by Mrs. Henrietta Chanfrau and C. W. Tayleure for a short season. Earlier that fall, Mrs. Chanfrau made news when she attended a performance at the Varieties Theatre with her husband. On Nov. 11, 1875, the New Orleans Republican reported, “Mr. Frank S. Chanfrau, the comedian, and his wife, Mrs. Henrietta Chanfrau, occupied a box at the Varieties Theatre last night. In a professional way, these artists differ as much as do ‘Kit Redding’ and ‘Christie Johnstone’ on the stage, and they seldom meet, and never set together during the theatrical season. In the summer they are ‘at home’ in their comfortable Long Branch residence, playing domestic life in a congenial manner, and appearing an honorable example to the members of the profession” (p. 4).

On Dec. 12, 1875, The New Orleans Bulletin announced Dressel’s scenic work for Chanfrau in “Parted, or the Trust Company Failure,” at The Varieties Theater. The article reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist of the theater, has been engaged for some time in preparing the scenery for this play, and judging from the admirable exhibition of his skill we have witnessed this season, we predict a rare treat for visitors of the theater” (p. 5).

Dressel continued to make news during at the Varieties Theatre for the rest of the season. On Jan. 4, 1876, the New Orleans Bulletin reviewed Geo. Fawcett Rowe in Halliday’s dramatization of Dickens’s ‘David Copperfield,’ which he named ‘Little Eml’y’.’ The article reported, “Mr. Dressel, the scenic artist, has added new laurels to his list by the elegant and effective scenery used in the play. The boat-house, the church scene, which is, by the way, and exact representation of the Canterbury Cathedral in England, and the storm scene were all perfect gems of the painter’s skill and reflect the utmost credit upon the artist whose pencil formed them” (p. 1).

Of “Watts Phillip’s military and romantic drama ‘Col. Willoughby; or, Not Guilty,’ The New Orleans Bulletin announced, “The plot of the play is in itself very interesting and exciting, and with the truly magnificent setting given it last night, makes one of the most splendid stage attractions we have seen in this city for many a long day. The ship scene in the second act, and the third and fourth acts, were new artistic triumphs for Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the theatre” (25 Jan 1876, p. 5).

Dressel was also heralded for his work on other New Orleans projects that month. On January 9, 1876, The New Orleans Bulletin announced, “The equestrian statue of Jackson which adored the gallery of the Pickwick Club yesterday was executed by Mr. Harry Dressel, the talented scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, and was completed in an almost incredibly short space of time”) p. 1).

On Jan. 27, 1876, The Times-Picayune described the Washington Artillery Grand Ball at St. Patrick’s Hall: “But the most conspicuous object in the hall, and one upon which the gaze dwelt the longest, was a large sized painting that extended across the wall above the stage. The cartoon was done by Dressel, the scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, represented a scene in the Shenandoah Valley. In the far distance appeared the huge masses of the Blue Ridge, with its irregular profiled outlined against the sky and white masses of snow merging into the azure coloring of the mountain tops. The silvery course of the Rappahannock might be traced across the broad expanse of rolling green sward, until the glitter of the stream was lost on the obscurity of the forest that stretched along the foot of the mountain range. In the foreground appeared two small field pieces, and close by on the ground a pile of cannon balls, a drum, and a group of muskets. The general effect of then painting was excellent and attracted much attention” (p. 1).

Of Dressel’s painting for John T. Raymond, The New Orleans Bulletin reported, “Mr. Harry Dressel, the talented scenic artist of this theater, has, won additional honors for himself during Mr. Raymond’s engagement – the realistic effect of his steamboat explosion, and his beautiful landscape painting has evoked the warmest praise” (Feb. 6, 1876, p. 8).

Less than two weeks later The New Orleans Bulletin commended Dressel’s work on “Christie Johnstone” at the Varieties Theater: “The scenic effects are very fine, especially the lifeboat rescue, which is a perfect marvel in its way, and is another triumph for Mr. Harry Dressel.” (Feb. 18, 1876, p. 8).

On March 8, 1876, The New Orleans Bulletin heralded Dressel for scenery in Chanfrau’s production of “Kit” – “Mr. Harry Dressel has done all he possibly could to render the play attractive and has really produced some scenic effects worthy of applause always tendered by the audience. The steamboat and the cabin are beautifully painted” (p. 5).

Dressel worked in New Orleans until the end of the season, then followed the Chanfrau Company to New York for the summer. On April 30, 1876, the New Orleans Republican announced, “Mr. Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the Varieties Theatre, leaves immediately for Chicago, and will be employed at the Eagle Theatre, New York, for the summer season” (p. 4). He left the city on May 4, heading up the river to Evansville, Indiana. On. May 9, 1876, The Evansville Journal   announced, The Charles Morgan arrived at 1 am with a big trip of freight and a crowd of people” that included “Harry Dressel and A. Riet, scenic artists” (p. 7). I was fascinated to read, “The Morgan was five days and eight hours out from New Orleans, including all delays.” In Evansville, the ship “discharged 65 barrels molasses, 35 barrels sweet potatoes, 15 barrels rice, 10 of pineapples, 4 cases bananas, 10 sacks coffee, and other freight.” From Evansville, Dressel headed west to Chicago. He was heading home to visit family before starting a position in New York.

On May 7, 1876, The Brooklyn Sunday Sun announced, “Mr. Clifton W. Tayleure, manager of the Varieties Theatre, New Orleans, has entered into a contract with Mr. Josh Hart, of the Eagle Theatre, for occupancy by the Chanfrau Company of the latter place of amusement after June 5…This company will probably occupy the Eagle Theatre until the fall season opens when Hart again assumes the management with a strong comedy troupe” (p. 5). Located at Broadway and 33rd Street, Josh Hart was the sole proprietor. While examining a few activities at the Eagle Theatre in 1876, I was surprised to discover sheet music for “Emancipation Day,” dedicated to Mr. Josh Hart. The cover noted, “sung with immense success at the Eagle Theatre, New York.”

Braham, David, “Emancipation day: song and chorus ” (1876). Representations of Blackness in Music of the United States (1830-1920). Brown Digital Repository. Brown University Library. Here is the link: https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:17080/

Before Dressel joined the Chanfrau company in New York, he visited family in Chicago. It was early May in 1876. I wonder what brought Dressel home. It may have been his father’s declining health, as of May 1876, Louis Dressel made out his will.

When Dressel returned to New Orleans that fall, he resumed a position as scenic artist at The Varieties Theatre. On Nov. 11, 1876, Dressel was credited with the scenery for “Our Boys” under the management of Charles Pope.

Although Dressel was listed as scenic artist for the Varieties Theatre in the 1876 and 1877, New Orleans Directory, he also continued to complete a variety of projects that included fresco work. On Aug. 5, 1877, The Times-Picayune reported, “The ceiling of the office has been very prettily frescoed by Dressel, the scenic artist of the Varieties, and there are panels adorned with appropriate figures typifying industry and commerce. The steamboat Natchez has also a place among the figures on the ceiling. The walls are frescoed in scroll and figure work” (p. 1).

In 1877, Dressel was naturalized as a US Citizen.

The most interesting article that I discovered described Dressel’s work as a lighting artist. During the late 19th century, many scenic artists performed on stage. They would rapidly sketch characters or paint scenes as a variety act. At the Academy of Music in New Orleans, Dressel rapidly painted a tropical landscape for the benefit for Mr. William Morris, machinist of the theatre. On June 1, 1878, The Times-Picayune reported, “Harry Dressel, the scenic artist, who painted in sight of the audience, in less than eight minutes, a complete tropical landscape, commenting on a plain white canvas, six by eight feet. The subject was suggested by the audience, and the composition was the study of the moment. Time was called and the artist run a horizon line, spread on a warm sky, placed a mountain range, run a stretch of water, drew date and palm trees with spreading leaves, dropped a few bright flowers for perspective effect, and left a very pleasing picture for the admiration of an audience that was enthusiastic over such an exhibition of artistic skill and rapid execution” (p. 8). I have written about other lighting artists in the past and find their popular performances intriguing.

Despite accepting a variety of projects, in 1878, Dressel was still associated with the Chanfrau Company, even mentioned in their newspaper advertisements. On April 4, 1878, the Chattanooga Daily Times included an ad for the production of “KIT, The Arkansas Traveler.”

 The article reported, “Their great work was witnessed by upwards of 400,000 personsat Booth’s Theater, New York, and has realized Mr. Chanfrau over $65,000… ENTIRELY NEWSCENERY by Harry Dressel, the famous Scenic Artist of New Orleans, especially painted for this production.”

Dressel delivered scenery for KIT in 1878.

On October 6, 1878, the Chicago Daily Tribune published an advertisement for “Dominick Murray, in his exciting and very successful drama, entitled ESCAPED FROM SING SING; or, Criminal Life in New York” at Hamlin’s Theatre, 87 Clark-st., opposite Court House” (p. 1). The ad announced, “The Drama will be produced with entirely new Scenery by MINARD LEWIS, Esq., and HARRY DRESSEL, Esq.”

This brings Dressel back to the home of his family in 1878.

By 1880, Dressel partnered with John Charles Evans in St. Louis to form Dressel & Evans, scenic artists. Their firm was listed in the New Orleans Directory for 1881 and 1882. Evans partnership with Dressel ended by 1883. Evans, however, continued to work as an artist in New Orleans, and was listed in the next three City directories. Although his address remained the same, his name shifted from Charles to John, and back again. Evans became another employee as the Chicago-based firm of Sosman & Landis employee. Here is the link to Evans’ biography https://drypigment.net/2023/04/08/sosman-landis-shaping-the-landscape-of-american-theatre-employee-no-103-j-c-evans/

J. C. Evans was a scenic artist who went on to work for Sosman & Landis in Chicago.

On May 10, 1883, The Times-Democrat published an article entitle “OUR SUMMER OPERA – Arrival Yesterday of Miss Alice Oates and Her Company for Spanish Fort” (p. 3). Their arrival was “over the Louisville and Nashville road” with a 25-person opera company. Originally coming from NY.  “Mr. Harry S. Dressel, so well known here as a scenic artist and in connection with our theatres, has made the architectural designs and will superintend the decorations, scenery, etc. His past successes insure excellent work.”

On May 14, 1883, The Times-Democrat of New Orleans, reported about the Spanish Fort: “The gangs of workmen were engaged all day on the theatre over the water, just in front of the reck grotto, and the work will be continued night and day until completed. Already the joist for the floor have been laid, and as the rest of the frame-work has already been prepared to be put together, by the 20th the building will be completed, in time for the opening by the Alice Oate’s Opera Troupe. Piles are being driven for the foundation of that portion of the building to be occupied by the stage, which work will be finished by Tuesday. Harry Dressel is not losing a moment, and yesterday was hard at it, up on a scaffold, working on the new drop curtain. It will. Represent a scene in the days of Louis Quatorze. In the centre is a colonnade and portico of a palace, not unlike the Trianon, and before it a number of court ladies and gallants are engaged in the then favorite game of battledore and shuttlecock. The poses are graceful and the picture animated. Rich foliage gives a pleasant contrast to the white marble columns and adds a softness to the scene. Mr. Dressel is sparing no pains on this artistic study (p. 3).

Harry Dressel made news across the country. On Nov. 30, 1889, the Telegraphic News section of the Indianapolis Journal reported, “Harry Dressel, the well-known scenic artist, was dangerously stabbed at New Orleans, yesterday, by Ferdinand Amant” (p. 1). Dressel was now 38 yrs. old and wanted money for a project he completed.

On Dec. 3, 1889, the Cincinnati Commercial Gazette reported, “Harry Dressel, the well-known scenic artist of the New Orleans French Opera-house, was severely stabbed one day last week by a lawyer named Armant in a saloon adjoining the theater. The trouble grew out of an unpaid bill for work done by Dressel during the time of the Cotton Palace” (p. 8).

On Dec. 4, 1889, The Louisiana Review described the altercation about the unpaid bill:

“A difficulty occurred between Harry Dressel, scenic artist of the French Opera House, and Fernaud Armant, last Friday afternoon, in a barroom on Toulouse Street, over an unpaid bill for painting a stage curtain of the Cotton Place. Blows were exchanged and Dressel was cut on the face and neck by Armant. The wounds are not considered dangerous. Armant surrendered to Captain Journee, but was released under a $1000 bond” (p. 5).

Dressel briefly left Louisiana and headed to Texas. He picked up a variety of projects, including the design and decorations of floats for German Day. On Oct. 7, 1891, the Galveston Daily News announced, “By 6 am Mr. Harry Dressel, the artist in charge of the decorated floats was busy with a corps of hearty fellow, getting the heavy floats out of the warehouse sheds into the street” (p. 8).

By 1900 Dressel returned to New Orleans.

On Aug 24, 1900, The Canton Times of Canton, Miss. Reported, “The Manning-Yale Co., the biggest and most complete vaudeville aggregation touring the South will open at the Opera House Wednesday, September 12th…the company is composed of twenty vaudevillers who have made reputations and sustained them. A uniformed concert band and complete orchestra is included. Special scenery painted by the renowned scenic artist Dressel, is used. No expense has been spared to make this production one of the grandest in every detail and disappointment has yet to be evidenced by any audience” (p. 4).

On May 30, 1905, The Times-Democrat published Dressel’s obituary:

 “Harry H. Dressel, a well-known scenic artist, dies at his home, 4318 Canal Street, yesterday afternoon, after an illness of several weeks. His death was a shock to his many friends and acquaintances in this city, for he had been actively engaged in his work up to a short time before his death. Mr. Dressel was born in Hanover, Germany, fifty-three years ago, in which place he received his early education in college as well as in art. He came to this country when a young man and engaged in scene painting. Thirty-one years ago, he came to New Orleans and had lived here since that time. Mr. Dressel became connected with the French Opera House, and for a time worked exclusively. For that playhouse, turning out many hundreds of pieces of work. His studio was in the building, and within those walls he acquired fame. Mr. Dressel did work for the Grand Opera House and also for the St. Charles Theatre. Mr. Dressel started Lake View Park and fixed up a studio at West End. He did much work on the park, and at the same time worked on Carnival ball settings. His work for the Atlanteans was always complimented. The work for the Atlanteans of this year was the last he did. Mr. Dressel was at one time a member of the Southern Yacht Club. He was a vice president of the Ozone Spring Water Company and was a Knight of America belonging to Crescent Lodge No. 110. Mr. Dressel is survived by his wife. The interment will take place to-morrow at the Greenwood Cemetery” (p. 10).

His will was published in The Times-Democrat on 2 Jun 1905, noting, “the will admitted to probate makes a number of bequests: $500 to Harry Groh; $200 to William O. Conne; $100 to Mrs. William Groh; $25 to Lizzie Brown – the remaining property given to Miss Annie L. Hall with $200 for the purpose of keeping the grave of the deceased. David Lemly appointed executor” (p. 10).

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Arthur R. Hurtt Street Scene, Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

This post could be titled “Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre. Employee No. 114 – Arthur R. Hurtt.”  Yes, I have identified more Sosman & Landis employees this month.

There is always a particular drop that catches my eye when examining an historic scenery collection. It might be the design, or maybe a manufacturer stamp; something that makes another piece of the puzzle fall into place.

On Wednesday, January 10, 2024, I examined a street scene at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. It was the end of the very long day, but my heart leapt when I read the signature – “A. R. Hurtt.”

Street Scene by Arthur Hurtt on display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Signature on Street Scene by Arthur Hurtt.

Painted detail in Street Scene by Arthur Hurtt.

I first became aware of Arthur R. Hurtt while working on an Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP) Grant at the University of Minnesota Libraries Performing Arts Archives. I was processing the Great Western Stage Equipment Co. collection (GWSE Co.), the second of two scenery design collections negotiated by Professor Emeritus C. Lance Brockman, University of Minnesota Theatre Department (Twin Cities). The GWSE Co. materials were purchased for the University Performing Arts Library through the collaborative efforts of the University Library, the Department of Theatre Arts and University Theatre alum, Tom Scott.

I spent the better part of a year (1989-1990) cleaning and cataloguing the collection under the supervision of Barb Bezat in a run-down industrial building near the Prospect Park neighborhood. It was a far cry from the modern facility (Elmer L. Anderson Building) that is now located on the U of MN West Bank.  It was Barb who taught me how to clean, repair, and catalogue incoming acquisitions; many techniques that I have carried over to scenery restoration.

Barb Bezat in the stacks at the old archive building. Photograph courtesy of Bezat.

In my spare time, I replicated several designs, then enlarged painted details in distemper paint in the scene shop. As I was learning necessary scenic art skills, I was also practicing with distemper paint (dry pigment paste and hide glue).

10″ x 10″ replica by Wendy Waszut, 1989.

After copying the design at the archives, I would take my replica back to the scene shop where I would paint a 5’-0”x5’-0” full-scale detail using distemper paint (dry pigment paste and diluted hide glue). In the end my small flats were displayed at various UROP events. I presented the results of the UROP project, “The Categorization and Indexing of the Great Western Stage Equipment Co. Collection” both on campus and at a UROP conference in Schenectady, NY.

Photograph with my 5′ x 5′ distemper painting. Published in a CLA Newsletter, 1990.

I received a second UROP grant to process another Brockman acquisition – The Holak Collection (Sosman & Landis and New York Studios). There is nothing quite processing an incoming collection composed of theatrical designs and supplementary materials. You become entrenched in not only the visuals, but also business logistics and marketing tactics.

Some of my happiest hours were spent exploring the contents of a neighboring collection in the stacks – the Twin City Scenic Co. Collection. Much larger in scope, it had not only been processed in the mid-1980s, but had also been featured in an exhibition. Scenic designs and supplemental materials were exhibited from April 5 to June 14, 1987, in the Third Floor Gallery of the University Art Museum, Northrup Auditorium. I never had the pleasure of seeing the exhibit, as I didn’t start my college career until that fall.

It was while exploring the contents of the Twin City Scenic Collection in 1989 that I first encountered a design by Arthur R. Hurtt.

Hurtt, Arthur R.. Sketch of European street with a bridge and city gate.. University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll116:87 Accessed 29 Jan 2024.

He was a one-time employee of the Twin City Scenic Studio, c. 1900-1909. I again examined the sketch as a doctoral student in 1999. At the time, I was assisting in the design of a searchable database for the Performing Arts Archives scenery collections. One of my many tasks was to assign metadata for each digitized image in the Twin City Scenic Co. Collection, Great Western Stage Equipment Co. Collection, and the Holak Collection.

Screenshot of information that used to be included in the database before it shifted servers.

One of my responsibilities was to select five keywords to best identify the artwork. I also created a list of identifiers, while determining creators. It was a challenge to match paintings based in color combinations, paint application, and brush stroke. I was constantly comparing rough drafts, pencil sketches, and color renderings. This meant that I eventually memorized the contents of three collections.

Best. Training. Ever. 

My continued handling of the three collections helped shape my understanding of scenic illusion for the stage. It also provided me with a visual reference when examining extant examples of full-scale scenery at historic opera houses.  

When I encountered Hurtt’s signature on a street scene at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana, it was like greeting an old friend.  It also meant that I immediately knew the significance of the piece. 

I know of no other extant scenic artworks by Hurtt. This drop may be one of the most important artifacts at the museum. Hurtt’s scenic art legacy spanned over sixty years, linking him to major scenic studios in Minneapolis, Chicago, Kansas City, St. Louis, New York, and Los Angeles. In 1901, he was even chosen as the representative of the American Association of Scenic Artists in the international association, visiting Germany, Switzerland, Italy, and Norway in the interests of American scenic art. Although I have gradually added information to my Hurtt file over the years, this project provided me with an opportunity to do a deep dive into his life and career.

His biography is often included in publications that list regional artists, citing that he studied at the Art Students League of New York with Douglas Volks and Irving R. Wiles, and in France with Alex Fournier. Mentions of his early life and scenic art career are vague or non-existent. I am going to try and fill in a few gaps, illustrating the theatrical contributions and remarkable individual who was born in a small Wisconsin Village six months after the onset of the Civil War.

Arthur Russell Hurtt, 1901.

Arthur Russell Hurtt was born on Oct. 31, 1861, in the village of Trimbelle, Pierce County, Wisconsin. For geographical context, the township of Trimbelle is situated along the Trimbelle River in western Wisconsin. It was a newly settled area when the Hurtt family moved north from Illinois.

A map showing the location of Trimbelle, Wisconsin.

Trimbelle’s post office was established in 1855, with postmaster Aaron Cornelison bringing the mail from Prescott once a week. Early buildings included a church, school, and grist mill. As settlers arrived at the area, a variety of other businesses appeared, including sawmills, blacksmith shops, and a furniture store. In fact, ten other townships were organized in Pierce County by 1860. They included Martell, Isabella, Diamond Bluff, Clifton, Oak Grove, Perry, Pleasant Valley, Hartland, Trenton, El Paso, and River Falls.

The story of Hurtt’s parents is quite complex and took quite a while to track down. Arthur was the third child born to William G. Hurtt (1826-1894) and Sarah Marcy Smith (1828-1897). That being said, he was the fourth child born to his mother. Sarah was the youngest daughter of a Revolutionary veteran. On Dec. 8, 1897, The Berkshire County Eagle reported, “Mrs. Sarah M. Smith Hurtt, whose death was mentioned in the County Eagle of November 24, as having occurred in St. Paul, Minnesota, justly claimed to belong to the Daughters of the American Revolution. Her father was the late Russell Smith of Stockbridge who enlisted in the Revolutionary War at the age of 18. He married his second wife here in Stockbridge after he was 60 years old and his only child, Sara M. Smith (Hurtt) was born when her father was 64 years of age. Mr. Smith. Who (by the way was a great uncle of your Stockbridge Correspondent) was one of the revolutionary heroes, who fought for American freedom” (p. 14).

She was quite a lady. In 1896 Mrs. Sarah M. Hurtt was featured in The Minneapolis Journal on April 25, 1896. Under the heading “In a Woman’s World,” the article reported, “This sketch is by her son, Arthur Hurtt, the well known scenic painter, from a bust by Jacob Fjelde, the sculptor. Mrs. Hurtt is the daughter of revolutionary hero, Russell Smith, who at the age of 18 was drafted, in 1780, and fought in the American Revolution. He had three brothers who fought in the same was. His daughter was born when Russell Smith was 64 years old, and she was 14 when he died. She remembers well his stories of experiences in the Revolution” (p. 5).

Bust of Arthur Hurtt’s mother by Jacob Fjelde, published in The Minneapolis Journal, 1896.

The sculptor was Norwegian-born American Jacob Henrik Gerhard Fjelde (1859-1896); well known as a portraitist and creator of public sculptures. Here is a link for more information about Fjelde: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Fjelde

Portrait of Jacob Fjelde. Here is the image link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jacob_Fjelde#/media/File:Jakob_Henrik_Gerhard_Fjelde_(1859%E2%80%931896).png

Hurtt’s mother’s story and portrait were again published the following year when she passed; this time in the Minneapolis Daily Times on Nov. 24, 1897 (p. 4).

Sarah M. Hurt portrait, published in the Minneapolis Daily Times, 1897.

This interesting tidbit was again publicly made known when Hurtt was working as a scenic artist in Los Angeles, California. On March 9, 1907, The Los Angeles Times reported, “Mr. Hurtt is said to be the youngest person whose grandfather was in the War of Revolution. His mother was Sarah M. Hurtt, a daughter of a Revolutionary soldier. Her father, Russell Smith, enlisted in 1780 at the age of 18. He was 64 years old when his daughter Sarah was born” (p. 24).

I am going to start out with Sarah M. Smith, as she was the hardest to track down in public records. Sarah was the daughter of Russell and Cynthia Smith, she married her first husband, Royal B. Whitney (1823-1856), at the age of 21 yrs. old on Aug. 24, 1849, in Lanesborough, Massachusetts. This was her 26-yrs. old husband’s second marriage.

The 1850 census lists the newly-married couple living with Royal’s family in Buxton (York County), Maine. Royal was one of several adult children living on the Whitney farmstead that year. Oddly, Royal and Sarah Whitney were also counted at another Buxton household when the 1850 census was taken, with Royal listed as an engineer. In 1853, Sarah and Royal’s only child, Mary Abbey Cynthia Whitney, was born.

This is where it gets a little confusing.

Sarah gave birth to William Hurtt’s first child, Isabelle Hurtt, in 1855. Hurtt was her second husband. Then the couple celebrated the birth of a son, William Hurtt Jr. in 1856. Both children were born in Illinois while her first husband, Royal Whitney, was still alive and legally married to Sarah. He did not pass away until 1856, and Sarah did not marry Hurtt until 1860. Arthur Hurtt was born in 1861, the first legitimate child of Sarah and William Hurtt.

By 1860, Sarah’s second husband was caring for her three children in Trimbelle, Wisconsin. She is conspicuously absent from the Hurtt household in the 1860 US Federal Census Report. William Hurtt’s household included: William (35 yrs.) and his children: Mary (18 yrs., step-daughter), Isabelle (6yrs., daughter) and William Jr. (4 yrs., son). His wife was also living in Trimbelle and working as a schoolteacher. However, she was living with Alexander and Hannah Hathaway, and an 8-yrs. old girl named Sarah Whitney, who listed Wisconsin as her birthplace.

The Hurtt’s were still living in Wisconsin at the onset of the Civil War. William Hurtt enlisted in the Union Army at Prescott, Wisconsin, listing the town as his residence. Private William G. Hurtt served with Company A, 12th Regiment, Wisconsin Infantry, from Dec. 16, 1863, to July 16, 1865.

I am uncertain as to when the Hurtt family moved twelve miles west to Prescott, but they were still living there in 1870. A much larger community than Trimbelle, Prescott is located at the convergence of the St. Croix and Mississippi Rivers and offered many more employment opportunities. It was a center for river transportation, shipping, and milling. There was an ample supply of wood, as harvested pines were rafted down the St. Croix River. When the 1870 census was taken, William Hurtt was employed as a cooper.  Keep in mind that those skilled a barrel-making were an essential part of agricultural activities, especially in the Midwest.

The Hurtt family lived in Prescott for much of the 1870s before venturing up the Mississippi to St. Paul, Minnesota. Both William and Arthur Hurtt were listed in the 1878 St. Paul Directory. The family lived at 136 E. Fourteenth, with William continuing his trade as a copper and Arthur working as a painter. In later years, Hurtt recalled that he began his “study of art” in 1878.

The family remained at the same address the next year, with Arthur continuing work as a painter. In 1879, he listed his employer as Ingham & Corlies. This firm manufactured sash, door, and blinds. Painters were employed to paint scenes on decorative blinds for both commercial and residential windows. Edward Ingham’s and William Corlies’ storefront was located at Eighth and Jackson. Arthur likely worked at their factory location; the northwest corner of Sixth and Cedar. Other employed at Ingham & Corlies in 1879 included glaziers, machinists, woodturners, and carpenters. In fact, there were over 200 individuals who listed themselves as painters in the St. Paul Directory that year, working for a variety of firms that included factories for machinery such as St. Paul Harvester Works, St. Paul Plow Works, St. Paul Foundry & Manufacturing Co., and the St. P & D. Railroad. Beck & Rank, E. F. Kramer & Son, Judson & Brack, and J. A. Brazille & Bro. were decorating firms that also employed a significant amount of painters in St. Paul, advertising fresco, home, and sign painting. Hopefully, this provides context for employment opportunities when the Hurtt family moved from Prescott, Wisconsin, to St. Paul, Minnesota.

Hurtt transitioned from painting blinds to painting stage scenery in 1879. In later years, Hurtt listed that his first notable scene painting project was for C. R. Foreman’s “Cuban Spy.” In 1879, Kansas City newspapers announced the engagement of Foreman at Clark’s Coliseum Theatre in his “new and sensational drama…with new scenery, properties, etc.” (The Kansas City Times 30 Dec 1879, p. 8).

Arthur Hurtt painted scenery for Rial’s The Cuban Spy In 1879.

In 1879, William Hurtt was not listed in the St. Paul directory. Only Arthur and his mother, Mrs. Sarah Hurtt, were listed as living at 136 Fourteenth.

It is possible that William Hurtt’s injuries sustained during the Civil War forced the Hurtt family to move up stream and closer to a veterans’ facilities in St. Paul. On June 12, 1880, the William G. Hurt applied for a Civil War pension as an invalid. From this point on, he was not included in any City Directory. The 1880 census confirmed that William G. Hurtt was no longer part of the Hurtt household, as that year, the US Federal Census recorded that only Sarah Hurtt was living with three daughters: Mary A. C., Sarah E, and Martha “Mattie.” Arthur was likely on the road – painting. The 1890 Veterans Schedule listed William G. Hurtt at the Minnehaha Soldiers Home in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The 1880 St. Paul directory listed both Arthur and his mother living at 59 Cooper. Arthur was now listed as a scene painter, signaling the official beginning of his theatrical career. Hurtt soon working as the scenic artist for Wood’s Opera House in St. Paul and living at 202 13th street.

On Oct. 25, 1882, Hurt married Hansine “Winifred” Cammon (1864-1943) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Born in Henjum, Leikanger, Sogn of Fjordance, Norway, she was the daughter of Ole Ferdinand Cammen (1833-1896) and Bergitte Schanke (1832-1919). She emigrated with her parents as a toddler in 1866. By 1880, Winifred was listed as a domestic servant at the Kennedy boarding house at 183 Exchange Street in St. Paul. I have yet to locate any information regarding how to two met.

In later years, Hurtt stated that he worked on J. Rial’s production “Taken Fron Life” in 1882. Hurtt painted scenery for “Taken From Life” at the People’s Theatre that year. In both 1880 and 1881, Rial’s toured the Academy of Music in Minneapolis, offering an opportunity for Rial to encounter Hurtt (The Saint Paul Globe 7 Nov 1880, p. 8).

In 1883, Hurtt relocated to St. Louis, Missouri, resigning his position at Col. Wood’s Theatre. On April 1, 1883, The Saint Paul Globe reported, “Arthur Hurtt has resigned his position as scenic artist at Wood’s Opera House and will soon leave for St. Louis” (p. 5). As with many scenic artists at the time, Hurtt maintained a residence in more than one city. He painted an “H.M.S. Pinafore” set for the Chicago Ideal Opera Co. Extended stays in any one location for a scenic artist meant that new job offers had to reach them throughout the year. They trailed work from one region to the next, securing a series of rooms. For example, Hurtt was listed as an artist in the 1884 St. Paul Directory, rooming at 239 Norris. The mid-1880s found Hurtt bouncing back and forth between Minneapolis, St. Louis, and Kansas City. Rail travel between this metropolitan areas was extremely accessible at the time.

Hurtt’s services were secured for both the building and renovation of numerous opera houses throughout the 1880s. He was listed at scenic artist at St. Paul’s Olympic Theatre in Harry Miner’s Dramatic Directory for the season of 1884-1885.

His affiliation with St. Paul’s Grand Opera House started in 1883. That summer, he presented a painting to Harry G. Carter, who had charge of building the interior of the Grand Opera House.  On Aug. 26, 1883, The Saint Paul Globe reported, “a picture presented by Arthur R. Hurtt scenic artist to Mr. Carter, representing Carter’s process of turning out Opera Houses rapidly, which was very appropriate to the occasion, as he is certainly doing some rapid and excellent work on the new Opera house” (p 5). Smart move, as Hurtt later worked as a draughtsman for H. G. Carter in the 1886, even listing Carter as his employer in the St. Paul Directory

The Grand Opera House opened on Oct. 15, 1883, with Hurtt acting as the venue’s primary scenic artist. The Opera House was located on the east side of Wabasha between Third and, with other places of amusement including Conley’s Varieties Theatre, Knauf’s Hall, Pfeifer’s Hall, Music Hall and Athenæum. A notable project for Hurtt in 1884 was “Siberia.” In 1884, Hurtt painted a new drop curtain for Boyd’s Opera House in Omaha. Nebraska. On Sept. 13, 1884. The North Loop Herald announced, “A new drop curtain, costing $1,000 has been put up in Boyd’s Opera House at Omaha” (p. 3).

Hurtt was still listed in the 1885 St. Paul Directory as “scenic artist Grand Opera House, res 513 Robert.”

The Grand Opera House, St. Paul, Minnesota. 

On Feb. 1, 1885, The St. Paul Globe reported, “Mr. Arthur Hurtt, scenic artist at the Grand Opera House, is at work on a handsome tent drop, cottage flats and a couple of interiors, and a landscape scene just finished. Mr. Hurtt has only been connected with the Grand for a short period, but he has more than demonstrated his capacity for fine and artistic work. He is also engaged in revamping several sets of the eye-sore scenery which he found in use on his arrival, and which has been the subject of adverse criticism. The old scenery will be painted out as fast as possible, and before long it will be replaced with a stock of good modern sets. Mr. Hurtt is a gifted artist, and he deserves to be liberally encouraged, his treatment of foliage and figures being particularly fine.” On Feb. 22, 1885, The Saint Paul Globe  reported, “Mr. Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist at the Grand Opera House, is a very retiring and modest young artist. He makes his brush do the talking, Mr. Hurtt is a great worker, and works very rapidly. He is engaged on the flats and settings for the opera house to be produced next week. Two of the scenes are finished, one a garden scene and the other a landscape, both good in color and perspective. Mr. Hurtt is a close student of nature, his foliage being most natural – something not at all easy in scene painting. By the way, the new drop curtain, which was put in place in the West St. Paul theater, is also by. This artist; it is a striking and very attractive piece of work” (p. 2).

In March, Hurtt was heralded for his work on the production “A Social Wreck” that month too. On Mar 8, 1885, The St. Paul Globe “A Social Wreck” – “Special scenery is being painted by Mr. Hurtt, scenic artist of the Grand Opera, for the production of the Opera” (p. 8).

By the end of summer, Hurtt again relocated to another city; his move making news in St. Louis. On August 15, 1885, St. Louis Post-Dispatch (p. 12): “Arthur R. Hurtt, the distinguished young artist who formerly lived in this city and who has made such a splendid hit in St. Paul, has temporarily located to Kansas City. Arthur is a young man who won a name through untiring energy and hard labor” (p. 12). In Kansas City, Hurtt secured accommodation at Independence Square. Hurtt was an immediate success. On August 29, 1885, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported, “Arthur R Hurtt is astonishing the natives of Kansas City with the productions of his brush” (p. 11). In 1885, Hurtt delivered scenery to The Academy of Music in Omaha, Tootles Opera House in St. Joseph, Missouri, and the Bijou Grand Opera House in Milwaukee. I believe that Hurtt was sporadically working for Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio at this time. The firm had regional branches, including Kansas City, that hired well-known scenic artists for short engagements when their workload substantially increased.

As previously mentioned, in 1886 Hurtt returned to St. Paul where he worked as a draughtsman for Harry G. Carter.  This is not meant to say that he stopped painting scenery for the year, he just accepted enough work to warrant the association in the St. Paul Directory. His work with Carter did not last for long, and soon Hurtt was back as a scenic artist, even on the road, working as a scenic artist throughout the region. In 1887, Hurtt became associated with a Chicago-based firm, likely Sosman & Landis. He returned to Minnesota shortly before the opening of On April 30, 1887, the Leader-Telegram announced, “Arthur Hurtt and Charles Clark, scenic artists, are now engaged in completing scenery for the new Eau Claire theatre, 211 Barstow street. Messrs. Fred Burnard and Hays yesterday purchased the fixtures, lease, etc., of the Sherman House” (p. 3). In addition to drop curtains and stock scenery collection, Hurtt also worked listed the following shows for notable work in 1887: “The Danites,” “Two Orphans,” “The Gallery Slave,” and “The Silver King.”

In 1888, Hurtt became associated with the People’s Theatre. On February 19, 1888, his name was mentioned alongside several other well-known scenic artists in an article entitled “Stage and Scenery,” published in The Saint Paul Globe (p. 10). The article reported, “Arthur B. Hurtt at the People’s Theatre, this city, is comparatively a young artist, having been painting scenery less than ten years, and a St. Louis paper is authority for his being one of the best young artists in the country. Mr. Hurtt is very retiring and modest young artist, a great worker and works rapidly He studies hard, is a close student of nature and has the true spirit of an artist, He has made a life study of trees and landscapes, his foliage being most natural, which is not at all easy to accomplish in scene painting. Being a good colorist, and draughtsman as well, his work is not often surpassed. Mr. Hurtt came here from Chicago a short time before the opening of the People’s theater and has painted all the scenery used there except the drop curtain, which was let to a Chicago scenic firm owing to the rush of the opening.”  The Chicago firm mentioned in the article was Sosman & Landis.

Hurtt remained at the People’s Theatre for all of 1888, repeatedly making news for his scenic accomplishments. Notable projects in 1888 included “The Black Flag,” “The Octoroon,” “Hazel Kirke,” “A Celebrated Case,” “Leah, the Foresaken,” “Lost in London,” “The Mikado.” Hurtt was also credited with scenery for Theodore Hamilton’s “Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde,” “Sea of Ice,” and “Forty Theives.”

Of particular note was his work on “The Forty Thieves. On Dec 22, 1888, The Irish Standard reported, “Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist of the house, returned a few weeks ago from a two-week’s visit to New York in search of designs and materials for the elaborate stage setting which will be a conspicuous feature of the production. He has, since his return, been at work on the scenes, aided by a large staff of assistants, and some strikingly beautiful tableaux’s have been prepared.” (p. 5). Other productions at People’s Theatre included, “Romany Rye,” “The Governor, and “Antietam.” Of “Antietam,” or the Spy of South Mountain,” one newspaper article reported, “A plantation scene will be an especially elaborate piece of stage setting, and Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist, has provided a cyclorama, showing the stockade prison at Salisbury. Over 500 figures are shown on the canvas, and the scene will be topographically and historically correct” (p. 1).

Hurtt also continued scenic work at theaters in Minneapolis and St. Paul. In 1889 he painted scenery for Jacob Litt’s “The Stoaway” at the Bijou. On Oct. 13, 1889, The St. Paul Globe mentioned Hurtt’s continued association with the theatre in the “Foyer Gossip” section, “Arthur Hurtt, scenic artist of the Bijou, was last week called to Denver to paint the new scenery for the Star-Away company, which was burned up while the company was en route from Salt Lake City” (p. 10).

Hurtt’s work for Jacob Litt’s Grand Opera House in St. Paul even made news in Iowa. On Sept. 7, 1890, the Sioux City Journal reported, “The scenic artists were Arthur R. Hurtt and Fred E. Powers” (p. 10).

Hurtt’s reputation as an easel artist was also on the rise. On Sept. 18, 1890, the Minneapolis Daily Times reported “Arthur Hurtt’s Work. Another Half Hour in the Exposition Art Gallery. There’s a young Minneapolis man whose constant and conscientious work is bound to get him ahead. I refer to Arthur R. Hurtt. He is a clever scenic painter who does not propose to have a drop curtain fall upon him and his art before he has succeeded in appealing to a larger audience than view his stage effects. He puts in all his extra time in hard study, and the results are becoming very creditable to him. In the first gallery at the exposition hangs a picture by Hurtt entitled “Goldenrod.” A young woman in gray is standing in the midst of the Midas-touched flowers. There is some very good work in the picture, especially in the blossoms and the texture and coloring of the gown. Minnehaha is a never-ending joy to the artist or to the genuine nature lover. Her glen has many a beautiful sheltered nook not perceived by the careless comer, only discovered by her to the best of her lovers, just as the noblest of a shy woman is seen only by those who seek her out. Hurtt has painted a bit of “Minnehaha Creek” in No. 466. His “Reflection” too, shows this same hard work which Goethe pronounces the only genius.” (p. 2).

In 1891, Arthur Hurtt assisted William P. Davis in painting a drop curtain for the People’s Theatre in Minneapolis, Minnesota. On April 11, 1891, “The Irish Standard” reported, “The stage has been enlarged and improved, new curtain and scenery being especially designed and painted by W. P. Davis, as assisted by Arthur Hurtt” (page 5). Davis was also a former Sosman & Landis employee who had worked in Kansas City with Lemuel L. Graham in the mid-1880s.

Shortly after Hurtt’s work with Davis, he headed east to work in New York and Boston, at Niblo’s and the Globe Theatre, respectively. Touring productions in 1891 included DeWolf Hopper’s “The Lady or the Tiger.”

While working in the east during 1892, Hurtt painted drop curtains for stages in: Athol, Mass.; South Norwalk, Conn.; World’s Theatre, Boston, Mass.; and Soldier’s Home Theatre, Togas, Maine. That year, he was living in Boston; first at 426 Broadway S., and later at No. 3, Web Court in South Boston. By 1893, Hurtt listed two residences:  221 W. 11th St., New York City, and the Hillman House in Washington, D.C.

Despite his move, Hurtt continued to return home and paint scenery for Twin City theaters, especially when architect H. G. Carter was involved with the project. In fact, in 1893, Hurtt painted scenery for Minneapolis’ Grand Opera House, Bijou Opera House, and Hennipen Avenue Theatre. On Jan. 1, 1893, The St. Paul Globe announced, “Minneapolis will have another theater, and W. F. Sterling, the veteran manager and prince of good fellows, will be its manager” (p. 13). The article noted that Carter was the architect and “Arthur Hurtt, of the Globe theater Boston, will do the scenic curtain work.” Staff for the new venue was announced on April 1, 1893, in The Star Tribune (p. 3). The article noted, “[Manager Sterling] has postponed the selection of the company long enough to engage his old stage carpenter of the People’s, Wm. Brown, for the new theater. Mr. Brown is at present head stage carpenter for the Harris house in Louisville. He will arrive here sometime before the opening and superintend the construction of the stage. The scenic artist of the new theater will be Arthur Hurtt, now of Niblo’s Garden, New York. Mr. Hurtt is well known in this city and considers it his home.”

Hurtt’s hiring coincided with the birth of his adopted daughter, Mildred “Minnie” M., who was born in North Dakota in April 1893. Although, I have yet to uncover any definitive dates pertaining to Minnie’s adoption, on Oct. 5, 1899, The Minneapolis Journal  announced, “Arthur R. Hurtt has gone to Fargo, N. D. for a month” (p. 5).

April 20, 1893, the Star Tribune reported, “Arthur Hurtt, formerly scenic artist of the old People’s (now Bijou) Theater, and lately established in New York and Boston, arrived in the city yesterday to begin arrangements for painting and supplying the new People’s Theatre with scenery” (p. 5). By June, Hurtt began designing for the space.  On June 4, 1893, the Star Tribune reported, “L. C. Stafford, proprietor of the new People’s Theater, and Manager Sterling have accepted a bright suggestion for a dramatic introduction to the theater made by the scenic artist, Arthur Hurtt. He will paint four life-sized portraits of great American actors to be handsomely framed and hung on the walls of the entrance-way as a lasting ornament and distinguishing features if the theater. Mr. Hurtt suggested four great actors, but the suggestion was patriotically amended to American actors by Manager Sterling.  The sight of the speaking portraits will assist the patrons as they pass in to get into the dramatic spirit that should pervade a theater” (p. 17).

 On June 18, 1893, the Star Tribune announced, “Manager Sterling, of the People’s has accepted the design for the drop curtain submitted by Arthur Hurtt. The picture will be poetic and beautifully colored representation of the coming of spring. There will be flowers, children and a beautiful colored representation of the coming of spring. She will be an ideal queen of the May.”

William E. Sterling, manager of the new People’s Theatre.

Interior of the new People’s Theatre.

On March 17, 1894, The Irish Standard announced the anticipated opening of the new People (p. 8). The article described the stage, making special mention of Hurtt: “The paint frame and bridge for scenic artist Mr. Arthur Hurtt and his assistants is on the read was and is incessantly occupied by himself and assistants for the production of new scenes for the forthcoming plays, which will have every scene painted especially for them each week. “The new People’s Theatre opened on March 24, 1891; its final cost estimated to be $250,000.

Hurtt’s career continued to soar, and on May 31, 1894, The Minneapolis Journal Published a detailed article entitled, “Arthur Hurtt’s Dream” (p. 6). I am including the article in its entirety, as it fills in many blanks and shows how much scenic artists traveled for work.

“There is a good deal more in dreams – some dreams – than people sometimes think, and this was attested the other day in a strangely interesting story told to a Journal man by Arthur Hurtt, the scenic painter at the People’s, and well known too, for his work in the line of landscape.

In 1879 Mr. Hurtt came to Minneapolis to do some scenic painting for the old Academy of Music. When he had completed his work here, he went to St. Louis for a few days and then to Council Bluffs where he was to do scenes for a new stock company theater just opening in that town. When he was well on with the work in Council Bluffs, he was, as is often the case with a man in any line of work, so interested that he would dream at night of his plans and work. One morning he woke up and recalled a dream he had of a beautiful landscape. It was a place of rare beauty, a dale or valley in the midst of gentle hills surmounted by graceful trees. In the center of the scene stood a large rock with a splendid old elm tree overhanging it, and near at hand, a clear stream from water, were cattle drinking – a most picturesque and interesting scene. So strong an impression did it make upon his mind that he sketched it out during the forenoon, that seeming to be the only way he could rid himself of the dream that haunted him.

A day or two later a landscape was wanted to fill out the set of scenes. Casting about for some material, the artist bethought himself of his dream, got the sketch, and made a scene from it. It was complimented highly and was one of the best things he had ever done.

This was in the wintertime. In June Mr. Hurtt was in Danville, Ill., putting the scenery in a new stock house at that place. While at work one day some men about the place asked him if he would not like to go for a swim the next day. The Vermillion river is near at hand, a clear, cool stream, and the invitation was accepted, Hurtt took along his sketching box, to note down any suggestion for scenes he might find. When the party was near the bathing place, out in the country some distance from the town, they passed down a little hill and found themselves looking into a beautiful little valley. Hurtt stopped and was suddenly deep in thought. There was something familiar about the place. At last, the thought dawned on his mind that he stood in the presence of the exact scene he had painted from his dream – the same big rock, the high, overhanging elm tree, the wooded hills roundabout, the stream flowing through the grassy valley, and even as he looked some cattle came leisurely down the hill to drink, filling the last detail.

Hurtt could hardly speak when he was asked to go on with the party, he was so overcome with a strangeness of the whole thing. He said he would stop where he was and make a sketch and the rest went on. He was hardly able to use his material at first so impressed was he with the fact that he was actually sketching from nature the picture he had before painted from a dream.

The next day in sauntered and old actor named Keane, who had been playing Council Bluffs when Hurtt was putting in the scenery there and who was a member of the Danville Stock company. After some general conversation he said:

“Say, Hurtt, why don’t you paint a landscape like the one you painted in Council Bluffs; that’s the gem of the whole lot?”

Mr. Hurtt told him perhaps he would, and then asked the actor if he wouldn’t like to take a walk. They did so later in the day, and Hurtt piloted him to the little valley and let him discover the scene of the dream. He was quick to see it, and exclaimed:

“Well, here’s where you got your sketch is it, for your scene?”

Hurtt told him no. that he had never seen the spot until a day or two before; that he had never been to Danville before in his life. When he told the actor the story Keane was much impressed. It may be that the strain of superstition which some folks maintain runs in the blood of an actor was in the old actor’s veins; at any rate, he wrote a long story for it for the New York Clipper.

But the strange part of the matter did not end here.

Some months afterward Mr. Hurtt was in St. Louis. He is very fond of paintings, of course, and one day he stepped into a gallery to look over the collection. Passing from picture he at last halted before a large canvas having a beautiful scene – lo! It was the scene of his dream!

He was sure of it beyond all question – the bog rock, the overhanging elm the cattle drinking. The hilly enclosure, the valley and its grassy carpet – it was his dream scene in all essentials, only worked out in detail somewhat. Ore, as a painter for an exhibition would be apt to introduce more of the details that one painting for a theatre scene.

Hurtt was amazed beyond measure. Plainly the artist who painted it must have visited Danville and made a sketch or done the whole painting there; and then he remembered that the manager of the theater had told him how much the scenery around Danville was admired by the artists and how they came there from various parts of the country to make sketches.

That was all well enough as an explanation of the picture in the St. Louis gallery picture came from – the artist had been there for his sketch, but that didn’t explain the strange fact of the dream in Council Bluffs.

While Hurtt was looking at the picture and wondering about the strangeness of the whole thing, by one of those peculiar mental acts which no one can account t for suddenly remembered being in St. Louis before – a year before. He had passed along this same street and by this same gallery. Yes, and he remembered now that he had stopped in front of the window to look at a beautiful landscape when his attention was immediately taken by an accident in the street. A man or woman was hurt, and it was right in front of him, he stepped to the street with the crowd. He had but just glanced at the picture; had not had a chance to more than take in the general scope, and then when the excitement of the accident was over he had passed on up the street without looking in the window again.

But the one glance had been sufficient to photograph upon his brain the picture, before which he was now standing. In his dream he had called it from its sleeping place in the gallery of his brain.”

In addition to painting scenery for the New People’s Theatre, Hurtt also was associated with Minneapolis’ Metropolitan Opera House. However, in 1895, scenic art opportunities temporarily drew Hurtt back east. On Aug. 21, 1895, the Minneapolis Daily Times announced, reported “Arthur Hurtt, formerly the scenic artist at the Metropolitan, is now occupying the same position at the Broadway Theater, of New York” (p. 5). Hurtt went to paint for John H. Young, another former Sosman & Landis employee. On Nov. 15, 1896, the Minneapolis Daily Times verified the connection when reviewing Hurtt’s scenery in the McKee Rankin production of “New York As It Is” at the Bijou (p. 15). The article reported, “The production is promised to be adequately staged and the special scenes will include a new exterior showing the famous high bridge over the Harlem River, New York, from the brush of the well known scenic artist, Arthur Hurtt, late of the studio of John Young, of the Broadway Theater, New York.” Hurtt continued to work with Young over the years on a variety of projects. In 1898 Young designed the scenery for “Mistakes Will Happen,” with scenery painted by Hurtt. On June 18, 1898, the Minneapolis Daily Times reported, “Arthur Hurtt, the well-known scenic artist, has constructed and painted a remarkable novel scene from models furnished by John Young, the celebrated Broadway artist” (p. 4).

By the following year, Hurt was once again working in Minnesota’s Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Hurtt tried his hand at a new entertainment- Living Pictures at the Jacob Fjelde Testimonial. On May 23, 1896, the Minneapolis Daily Times described, “After a short intermission the curtain rose again over a series of very artistic living pictures, arranged by Arthur Hurtt. The first of these showed Leif Ericson, as Jacob Fjelde has sketched him – a sturdy Viking, standing in the prow of his ship, looking ahead to catch the first glimpse of the shores of Vinland. Allegoric representations of the various fine arts followed. Then came two pictures entitled “Gettysburg,” showing scenes from the famous battlefield. These two pictures were among the finest of their kind that have been seen here. The last picture showed Ole Bull, the great violist. This closed a program. Which, although somewhat extended, was excellent in every detail.”

On May 20, 1896, The Minneapolis Journal described Hurtt’s contribution, reporting, “Most interesting of all, under the circumstances, will be a reproduction, under Arthur Hurtt, of the best works of Fjelde, with living models. The living pictures, for such they will be in fact, will be illuminated by a 10,000-candle power light and will be very beautiful” (p. 13). As previously mentioned, Fjelde sculpted the bust of Hurtt’s mother.

That summer Hurtt expanded on the scope of his entertainment. He placed an advertisement on July 1, 1896, in the Minneapolis Daily Times advertising, “WANTED – Girls to pose for living pictures; professional models preferred; one small child, 3 or 4 yrs. old, to represent Cupid. Apply to Arthur Hurtt as stage door, Bijou opera house. Tuesday, 3 p.m.” (p. 7). Hurtt was in the process of creating a new entertainment. On Sept. 5, 1896, the Star Tribune “Arthur Hurtt’s Living Pictures at the Metropolitan.”

Another description of Hurtt’s “Living Pictures” was published in The Minneapolis Journal on Aug. 21, 1896 (p. 5). Here is the article:

“The living pictures presented at Lake Park last night by Arthur Hurtt’s company were a great success artistically and proved an excellent drawing card. The stage arrangements were very complete and satisfactory, although the preparation had entailed a large amount of work, and the lighting was perfect. Many of the pictures were shown in half a dozen different lights, greatly enhancing the interest and artistic effect. A large number of pictures were shown, nearly all being reproductions of famous and familiar paintings. Each was accompanied by suitable musical selections by the orchestra. The pictures were carefully and gracefully posed and were the best exhibition of the kind ever shown in this part of the country, Many of them were encored. Among the pictures shown were Joan of Arc, Psyches’ Mirror, The Fates, Gettysburg. Cupid, Neptune’s Daughter, Diana, Sappho, Spring, Summer, Grace Darling, Hailing the Ferry, Soldier’s Farewell, and Sweethearts. Miss Carrie Millward gave two admirably rendered coronet solos and Miss Lizzie McKeever sang several popular songs in a very fetching manner, which brought enthusiastic recalls. The big laugh of the evening, however, was when the curtain drew back revealing the round form of a “little Jimmy” posed as Dan Cupid with white wings and bow and arrows making a desperate and successful attempt to keep his face straight. The exhibition will be continued this evening and to-morrow, with numerous changes in the program.”

Hurtt continued to show his living pictures as a vaudeville feature at the Bijou that fall (Minneapolis Daily Times 3 Sep 1896 p. 4). I was intrigued to discover that his living pictures were paired with an animatography debut at the Bijou Theatre and am including the article as is shows an interesting pairing of early film and live theatre. On Aug. 4, 1896, The Minneapolis Journal announced, “LIKE THE VITASCOPE – The Animatograph Makes Its Debut in Minneapolis” (p. 8). The article continued, “Before 200 guests of Manager Hays, the animatography was given trial at the Bijou last night. The animatography is on the lines of the vitascope, which has been on attraction in Chicago and New York recently. It is the kinetoscope principle extended to fill a stage with moving and life-like scenes. Some of the scene showed typical street sights, ocean views, factory workers, bridges and passengers crossing and recrossing. Every picture was full of life, and it needed only the noise of the street and the crowd to add every element of realism.

G. A. Henry, who superintends the production, brought the machinery and views direct from London, Eng., where they were a part of the variety show at the Alhambra. Theodore Hays has secured the American rights with Mr. Henry and is looking after the bookings in this country. The first public production may be in Minneapolis on the roof of the Guaranty Loan building.

At last night’s entertainment Arthur Hurtt produced some of his living pictures and they were rewarded with hearty applause.”

In addition to theatrical endeavors, Hurtt’s easel art was becoming increasing popular. He exhibited watercolors as part of the first spring exhibition of the Minneapolis Art League. Held at Beard’s galleries, his work was featured alongside that of Alexis Fournier, Alex Grinager, Herbjorn Gausta, Prof. Robert Koehler, E. Ofstie, Florence Wales and Miss M. E. Roberts. Of Hurtt’s works, the Minneapolis Daily Tribune reported, “Arthur Hurtt has four strong watercolors, one of an Angora cat being particularly good” (1 June 1896, p. 6). I am going to sidetrack for a moment with the Hurtt family’s love for angora cars. In 1907, their 3-mths. Old angora cat, named Punk, even made the news.

On Sept. 1, 1907, the Star Tribune announced, “Remarkable ‘Puss’ Drinks From Babe’s Nursing Bottle.” The article continued, “’Punk,’ the talented cat belonging to Mrs. Arthur R. Hurtt, wife of the well known scenic artist, is almost human. He is a frisky little three-months-old Angora. According to his owner he is the smartest ‘baby’ for his age in all Hennepin county and can do tricks without number. One of his cutest stunts and one which he must enjoys is to hold a nursing bottle in his pows [sic.] and immediately get away with the contents of the bottle. While performing this favorite pastime The Tribune photographer caught him. Punk is the son of a full blood Angora cat that survived the San Francisco earthquake” (page 17).

Hurtt’s cat, Punk, featured in the Star Tribune, 1907.

Another picture of Hurtt’s cat, Punk, featured in the Star Tribune, 1907.

In 1897, Hurtt continued to travel for work, even venturing into Canada. That year he delivered a drop curtain to the New Winnipeg Theatre.

Hurtt continued his association with the Bijou. Notable productions that he painted for Litt in 1897 and 1898 include “Under Martial Law,” “The Showman’s Daughter,” “Matilda,” and “Mistakes Will Happen.” His association with the Bijou continued to be listed in the 1897 and 1898 Minneapolis Directories:

“Hurtt, Arthur R., scenic artist, Bijou Opera House, r w s 39th av s nw 49th.”

Other projects in 1898 included “Murray and Mack’s Finnigan’s Ball,” “On the Swannee River,” “Elsie DeTourney’s Joan of Arc,” and “Prisoner of Spain.” After the 1897-1898 season closed, Hurtt opened his own studio, placing advertisement in local newspapers. On 31 Jul 1898 Minneapolis Daily Tribune “SCENERY of all kinds. Studio, 215 Hennepin av, the only place of the kind in the northwest Arthur Hurtt, scenic artist” (p. 15).

Hurtt advertisement from Dec. 19, 1899 Minneapolis Daily Times.

On Dec. 19, 1899, Hurtt advertised in the Minneapolis Daily Times: “Scenery for opera houses, halls and secret orders, Arthur R. Hurtt 215 Hennepin, Mpls.” (p. 6).

From the Waszut-Barrett Theatre Collection.

Hurtt’s success prompted a residential move. In 1899, the Hurtt family moved to the Minnehaha Falls neighborhood. That summer, Hurtt hosted the wedding of his younger sister, Martha Charlotte Hurtt to Everett Grey Loring at their new home, 4840 39th Ave. S. The Hurtt’s new home was described in the Star Tribune on Aug. 20, 1899 (p. 14): “Mr. Hurtt’s home is situated on a hill overlooking Minnehaha creek as it winds among the trees, and it provided a lovely setting for a happy event.”

On Feb. 4, 1899, The Minneapolis Journal reported, “The enterprising residents of the Minnehaha Falls District who have built Hiawatha Hall for themselves as the center for the literary, dramatic and social affairs of the suburb, find themselves the objects of many congratulations, not only on this account of the building itself, but because of the artistic drop curtain which Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist, has supplied for the stage Mr. Hurtt lives on Minnehaha creek, and his environment was therefore well suited to inspire him for his subject. The photograph reproduced herewith gives an excellent idea of his treatment of the subject. The figures were painted from studies made from life in Mr. Hurtt’s studio. The canoe is from the real thing owned by the artist. The scene is on the creek above the falls at the point where Mr. Hurtt has built a rustic bridge near his house. The background is made up of masses of rich greens with a pretty bit of distance. Characteristic birches line the banks, and a deer may be seen peering through the foliage on the opposite shore. The picture is drapes at the top with deerskin fringed in Indiana fashion, and at the top left-hand corner hang beadwork, Indian relics and trophies. A scroll pattern of unique design borders the bottom and sides of the picture, with a strip of gold next to the latter. The whole effect is thus in keeping with the subject and the environment of Hiawatha Hall” (p. 9).

Image of Hurtt’s drop curtain in the Minneapolis Journal, 1899.

On June 25, 1899, The Saint Paul Globe reported, “Among the most expensive of the improvements is the construction, under the direction of W. K. Brown, of a new and commodious stage in the large pavilion, complete with all the requirements and including a complete equipment of scenery and a most elaborate drop curtain from the brush of Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist” (p. 28). Hurtt was also credited with Minneapolis’ Metropolitan Opera House and the St. Paul Metropolitan that year (Star Tribune 6 Aug 1899, p. 24).

Hurtt’s life and career constantly made news at the end of the nineteenth century. There are so many articles about his scenic work; simply too many to include in this post.

However, one really caught my eye. It was quite unique that places Hurtt in a different light, yet gives insight into his personality and character.

On March 15, 1898, the Minneapolis Daily Times announced, “Arthur Hurtt Tells of Moshik’s Characteristics by the Lines in His Hand” (p. 5). Hurtt read palms. The article reported, “About two months ago, shortly after John Moshik had been sentenced to hang for the murder of Remie Dicharme, Arthur Hurtt, the well-known scenic artist, obtained permission from Sheriff Phillips to visit the condemns man in his cell. Mr. Hurtt is an enthusiastic cheiromant, and he desired to examine Moshik’s hand. Jailer Diffield accompanied him to the cell, and the examination was made, Moshik displaying no unwillingness.

Mr. Hurtt examined the hand closely and took a print of it. He told Moshik of various incidents in his past life, and in every case his statements were corroborated by the man who, next Friday, is to pay the penalty of his crime upon the gallows.

He continued uninterrupted until he told of Moshik’s having rescued from drowning a few years ago.

“You told him that,” cried Moshik excitedly, turning to Jailer Duffield. “You are the only man who knew anything about it. It didn’t happen here, but I told you about it and you told him.”

He was assured that the two men had never met before, and form that time on dwelt with increased interest on what Hurtt told him. He had been forced to believe in what seemed to him miraculous knowledge of the man before him.

As already stated, this examination was made some two months ago, a fact which Jailer Duffield will corroborate, and perhaps the most remarkable thing which was disclosed was Mr. Hurtt’s opinion, expressed at that time, that Moshik would commit suicide about March 10. He warned Duffield that if great care was not taken the man would never live to be hanged. On March 8 Moshik took a spoon which he had sharpened for the purpose and attempted to sever the artery in his wrist, as already reported in The Times. Mr. Hurtt had been mistaken by just two days.

At the close of the examination Moshik asked:

“Do you think they are going to hang me?”

“I don’t see anything in your hand to indicate it,” responded Mr. Hurtt ambiguously.

“I don’t think so either,” responded the murderer, laughing. “I guess it’s all a joke.”

To a Times reporter, Hurtt said yesterday:

“When I examined Moshik’s hand there was nothing there to tell me that he was to be executed, but there was a line which said he was to die in prison, and another which announced it would likely be by his own hand. It is quite possible, however, that if I were to make the examination to-day I would find that the hand would tell me of his execution. The lines change rapidly, you know. It was merely an accident that the man did not kill himself. The intention was there. He simply did not know how to go about it; that’s all.”

For the purpose of better calling attention to Moshik’s peculiarities, Mr. Hurtt has contrasted his hand with that of Kelly, a murderer who was executed last year. Mr. Hurtt’s diagnosis of the two hands follows, just as he himself prepared it, shortly after the examination. The picture of Kelly’s hand was taken after execution:

“We have here two hands of two distinct classes of murderers: In the case of Kelly, executed March 1897, the hand of an impulsive, brutal nature. Note the thick, short fingers and thumb. The whole aspect of the hand impresses an intelligent mind as being thoroughly bad. Quite different is the hand of Moshik. This is the hand of a very unlucky man, not alone because of the fact that he was sentenced to hang. No matter what station in life or in what environments, he would have been with such a hand, an unlucky person – unlucky in whatever he undertook, sure to get the worst of it, as the phrase goes. Susceptible and easily influenced by those around him, he came into the world delicate in both mind and body. His mother was insane at the time of his birth and the headline shows that he has inherited insanity, and that this insanity will show itself at times under certain conditions, such as excitement or rage. However, the palm is pink in color, which denoted a bright, sanguine and hopeful nature. His is a rather square palm, with fingers a little mixed. He is versatile, has a considerable amount of mechanical skill and had he not been so unfortunate as to. Be thrown into a channel of life that he was, he would naturally have been polite, neat in dress, and punctual. Inapt in the professions, governed by the sciences, the owners of such hands excel in negotiation, They are industrious and industrial.

“The following are some of the principle events of his past life as shown in his hands, and which no doubt can be verified by Moshik himself. He was quite ill at the age of 5, nearly died with a fever at twelve and was sick again at 15. The different dates of imprisonment are indefinite but show that he spent just half of his life in prison. One term of nearly half a year was for a crime of which he was innocent. At the age of 20 his mind was at ease for about nine months, for at that time he had his liberty. A few years ago he came to near being drowned by attempting to rescue a drowning woman. He has some affection of the heart, as the line of his heart shows. He has loved a woman who has dark hair, dark eyes and is of medium height. He was engaged to be married, but the engagement was broken by another term of imprisonment, where he was terribly injured in the head.

“Kelly’s execution could have been foretold two or three years in advance of the event as the tendencies grew in that direction, and in his hand taken after death his execution is marked in no less than seven ways. But strange to say, Moshik, although under sentence of death, shows only the danger of execution, however, a certain sign in his hand says that he will die in prison.”

The following year, Hurtt made news again when the passing of Jim Knight made newspapers. On Sept. 23, 1900, the Minneapolis Daily Times announced, “Fall Hermit Passes Away. Demise of the Well-Known Character. ‘Mississippi Jim’ Dies at Hospital” (p. 11). The article began with “James Knight, better known as ‘Mississippi Jim, the hermit of Minnehaha,’ died at St. Mary’s Hospital yesterday, he was 70 years of age.” Of note, a paragraph reported, “Old Jim was found at death’s door two years ago by Arthur Hurtt, scenic artist. He discovered the old man on his bed, in a semi-unconscious sate but managed to resuscitate him.”  This account, combined with several others paint Hurtt as an empathetic and kind individual, willing to not only help, but understand those in need.

For the most part, Hurtt’s public presence in newspapers during the late-nineteenth century was primarily contained to Minnesota. In 1900, however, there was a subtle shift as Hurtt’s activities became recognized in neighboring states, including Iowa.

Hurtt’s drop curtain for the Pavilion Stage at Wildwood was also featured in The Saint Paul Globe on July 17, 1899 (p. 8)

Image of Hurtt’s drop curtain in The Saint Paul Globe, 1899.

On Oct. 21, 1900, the Minneapolis Daily Times reported, “Mr. Hurtt was born in Wisconsin less than forty years ago. His mother, a Virginian, was an artist and a lady of refinement. His father was a native of Massachusetts. Mr. Hurtt, when a wee toddler, used to climb up beside the table where the cook was kneading bread and imprint, with his baby finger, faces in the dough and draw on the kitchen floor attempts at pictures with a bit of coal. All through his boyhood he experimented with brushes and colors, and beginning in 1878 he devoted himself to fine art and has been a student in some of the best schools in the country. He accompanied his serious study with scene painting, which is a great school of itself, and thus he has had more than twenty years of experience in scene painting and stage decoration. In his scenic work he is considered to excel in foliage and landscape. That Mr. Hurtt is a man of vaudeville gifts is acknowledged. He studied architecture two years, and his pretty home in Minnehaha park was built under his supervision form plans and specifications made by himself. His drawings and studies of foliage and figures have been published in lithograph and are found in nearly all art stores and are much used by art students. Says the St. Louis Star: “Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist formerly of this city, is one of the best young artists in the country. His foliage and figure painting being exceptionally fine.” He paints stationary stage scenery and drop curtains for opera houses and his work is also in demand by the great traveling star companies; but few of those visiting Minneapolis are without several scenes painted by Arthur Hurtt. The portrait accompanying this sketch represents him as he looks to-day – a very young man to be called “the father of art in Minneapolis,” but he was here before Douglas Volk came and was inspiration and help to Alexis Fournier when that now rising artist was a struggling student. Mr. Hurtt is proud of Minneapolis but the part of it dearest to him is the vicinity of his home – the beautiful park, Minnehaha creek, the glen, the old houses of some of his neighbors which are not less historic landmarks than are Minnehaha falls, the theme of legend and song. Mr. Hurtt travels widely. His scenic work is found in all parts of the country and everywhere he goes, goes the good work for the honored city of his adoption. He could give The Times but a brief interview; he was just home from a three months’ engagement at Des Moines and was starting out on another trip to keep him away six week. It is needless to follow Mr. Hurtt’s professional career. That he has been successful in owning his faithful, conscientious and steady application not less than to his natural ability His whole life has been influenced by stage art and though he is a picture painter in oils and watercolors and an illustrator of books, that which he has done most he does best and his reputation rests on his achievements in scenic art. That Minneapolis appreciates him is shown by the fact that of her theaters and opera houses five show his work. These are: People’s theater, Metropolitan Opera House, Grand Opera House, Bijou Opera House, Lyceum Theatre. From a list of other theaters and opera houses where he has painted, we select Boyd’s Opera House, Omaha; Broadway theater, New York City; World’s Theatre, Boston. From a list of stage productions extending from 1879 to 1898 he says he considers the following fair examples of his work: “Panorama of the Life of Christ, 500 life-size figures; “The Silver King.” “Hazel Kirke,” Erminie,” De Wolf Hopper’s “The Lady or the Tiger.” – Charlotte Whitcomb” (p. 24).

Reception room, studio-residence of Arthur R. Hurtt, Minnehaha Park. From the Minneapolis Daily Times 21 Oct., 1900, p 24.

The Des Moines project mentioned in the article was for thew Grand. On August 19, 1900, The Des Moines Register described Hurtt’s new drop curtain for the renovated Grand (p. 7). The article reported, “The gloomy interior has given way to light and cheerful shades, and the stage has been equipped with a complete new set of scenery of the latest design, technically known as “flipper scenery.” It can be placed wherever wanted on the stage, and does not require the use of wing grooves. The drop curtain, which was executed by Arthur Hurtt, is a remarkably strong piece of work. The subject was taken from Maurice Leloir’s famous tableau, “La Derniere Gerbe” [The Last Sheath of the Harvest].” Hurtt’s work was further described on Aug. 17, 1900, in The Des Moines Register “The subject of the drop curtain is ‘La Derniere Gerbe.’ And is from the celebrated painting of Maurice Leloir. The artist who executed the curtain, Arthur Hurtt of Minneapolis, has made a highly interesting copy, full of strength and details” (p. 3).

Of the renovation, The Des Moines Register reported, “The remodeling of the Grand opera house is now practically completed. The scenery and fittings are entirely new and render the Grand one of the prettiest houses in the state. The painting and frescoing were done by Arthur Hurtt of Minneapolis, while several of the curtains were made in New York” (16 Aug 1900, p. 3).

Link to illustration: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Leloir_La_derniere_gerbe_1883.jpg

Amazingly, I located a watercolor painting from 1890 of the same composition on Pinterest (no citation). Here is the link: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e2/11/bb/e211bb797a83eda910af9422ea5eed6b.jpg

He was also making headway on a national front. On March 11, 1901, The Minneapolis Journal announced, “Arthur Hurtt Goes Abroad. Arthur Hurtt, the Minneapolis scenic artist, has been honored by being chosen as the representative of the American Association of Scenic Artists in the international association. He sailed for Paris on the Vaterland last Wednesday from New York. He will visit Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Norway in the interests of his art and will return about June 1. Mrs. Hurtt accompanies him” (p. 6). He returned to Minnesota on May 25. His return was published in the newspaper the very next day. On May 26, 1901, the Star Tribune announced, “Arthur M. Hurtt Returns from Extended Foreign Trip Where He Saw and Studied Much That is Valuable” (p. 7). The article reported, “the Minneapolis scenic artist returned yesterday morning, with Mrs. Hurtt from a three months’ trip through France, Belgium, and England. On the way back they stopped by the Pan-American Exposition, which in point of illumination and some other respects Mr. Hurtt says is truly remarkable. While abroad the artist was sketching, spending most of his time in and about Paris. He admires the beauty of the regal city as only an artist could, but he is still true to his colors, nevertheless, for he says the French women are not ‘in it’ with the American-made article.” Hurtt then proceeded to critique current Parisian dress.

On Jun 1, 1901, The Minneapolis Journal published an article announcing, “Minneapolis Artists Win Salon Laurels, Burt Harwood and Alexis Fourier Have Four Canvases Accepted for the Paris Salon” (p. 11). The article began, “There were 7,000 pictures entered at the Paris Salon for exhibition this spring, and of this 7,000 only 300 could be accepted, and of that possible 300 acceptances four came to Minneapolis men.” Hurtt was visiting Paris prior to the exhibition. His stay was mentioned: “Mr. Hurtt admired them himself and heard them highly praised by others…Mr. and Mrs. Hurtt were in Paris several weeks and saw the Minneapolitans resident there. Mr. Fournier was in the same hotel with them. Max Bohm and Mrs. Bohm (nee Miss Newcomb) had just returned from a two-month’s absence in Italy, and are at the Grand Hotel, Rue de Lambre.” His international role was recalled the following year when he began working for Lee Lash Studios in New York. Although

Hurtt was also associated with the Twin City Scenic Co. between 1902 to 1904. However, he never stayed with any one studio for long. His connection with both Sosman & Landis and Twin City Scenic Co. set a precedent for his relationship with Lee Lash Scenic Studio in New York.

On July 25, 1902, the Star Tribune announced, “Drawings for a Minneapolis Opera.” The article reported, “Arthur Hurtt, the scenic artist who was the representative at Paris of the American artists, has left Minneapolis for New York, where he goes to fulfil a three month’s contract with Lee Lash Company, scenic painters, at Thirty-ninth and Broadway. Mr. Hurtt takes with him the drawings and models for the scenes to the Madden-Day opera, ‘Niorada,’ and also the schemes for the three acts of ‘The Newest Woman,’ a new comedy by Oscar F. G. Day. Mr. Hurtt will meet Mr. Madden in New York” (p. 6). Hurtt sporadically worked for Lash until 1904.

Hurtt, like many scenic artists, not only painted scenery for theater stages, but also painted scenery for a variety of public displays. In 1904, he designed a panorama for the World Fair in St. Louis, Missouri.

On May 3, 1904, The Minneapolis Journal, published an article announcing, “A Realistic Panorama of Twin Cities and Fort. The Work, Partly Modeled and Partly Painted, Will Be an Important Feature of the Twin City Exhibit at the St. Louis Exposition.” A photograph of the work was included with the following article: “Minneapolis, St. Paul and Fort Snelling have been presented in a panorama which will probably attract the attention of thousands at the Louisiana Purchase exposition at St. Louis. The big canvas and the carefully modeled foreground was the work of the Twin City Scenic studio, located in the Bijou theater. The greater part of the drawing and work was done by Arthur Hurtt, a Minneapolis scenic artist. When properly illuminated, the panorama will be a beautiful one. In the foreground is a carefully modeled presentment of the Fort Snelling bluff and fort. The bridge across the Mississippi river at this point is faithfully reproduced in miniature and extends back to the canvas of the semi-circular panorama. As one faces the work, Minneapolis is seen in the distance to the left. The river winds down the canvas to hide itself behind the bluff of Fort Snelling in the foreground. It reappears to the right and takes a turn toward St. Paul. The curve is carried out with absolute fidelity to detail, and to the right the saintly city can be discerned. The whole color scheme is calculated to withstand the glow of numberless electric lights which will be concealed behind the model of Fort Snelling. This illumination gives the effects of great depth and distance, and in this feature the artist has done some remarkable work. The background is semicircular in form and requires great care in drawing and coloring. A Mistake in the slightest detail would have spoiled the perspective of the entire undertaking, but it has been successfully carried out. Those who were permitted to see the panorama in its unfinished condition, or, rather, without its hood, are anxious to see it after it has been prepared for the exhibition at St. Louis. The panorama will go in the Twin City pavilion at the St. Louis Fair. It was ordered by the joint committee of the two cities and is to be paid for from the funds raised in the two cities for advertising purposes at the exposition. The panorama was taken down and shipped to St. Louis, Monday, and will be in place on opening day” (p. 11).

Hurtt’s Panorama for the St. Louis Exposition, 1904.

Like many midwestern artists, Hurtt began accepting West Coast projects when the weather turned cold, spending winters in Los Angeles from 1904-1906. He was tentatively planning a move.

Over the course of the next few years as Hurtt continued to gain national recognition.  He continued to work from coast to coast. In January, his scenery for “The Sorceress” at the Temple Auditorium in Glendale, California, made the papers. On Jan 27, 1907, The Los Angeles Times featured a scene from “The Sorceress” (p. 79).

The caption read: “Mr. Ferris will revive this brilliant spectacle-play, this week, at the Auditorium. Miss Stone, who, of course, will play the title role, is especially adapted to the part, and is said to have scored unusual success in it in the east. Mr. Robson will be seen as Don Enrique, for him a congenial sort of character. The management promises, as far as scenery and costumes are concerned, a production of unusual splendor and effectiveness. The principal scenic artist, Arthur R. Hurtt, did most unusual work for “The Holy City” and has been preparing this setting for a long time.”

Hurtt’s work at the Temple Auditorium became a career-changing project. On March 9, 1907, The Los Angeles Times reported, “Glendale. March 8 – Arthur Hurtt the scenic artist busily engaged at the Temple Auditorium, has completed the purchase of a site upon which he intends to establish and art studio” (p. 24).

Jess D. Bonner pictured in the article.

Here is my post about Bonner:

Near the end of the year, Hurtt again made news in Los Angeles newspapers. He was called in to assist 28-yrs. old scenic artist Jess D. Bonner (1879-1914), painting four drops for “Sign of the Cross,” at the Auditorium. On December 8, 1907, the Los Angeles Herald reported, “There are fourteen scenes in this four-act play, and Mr. Bonner was called upon to turn them out in eleven days’ time. He has one assistant regularly employed – Maurice Tuttle – and a paint boy to help him. For ‘The Sign of the Cross’ production there was a total of 30,000 square feet of canvas to be covered and the task was too great. Consequently, Arthur Hurtt was called upon to assist, and Mr. Hurtt painted four drops, which will be shown for the first time tomorrow night. These drops contain about 1500 square feet of canvas each, leaving some 24,000 feet to be painted by Mr. Bonner and his assistant.” The entire article was primarily about Bonner but mention of Hurtt shows that he had remained in California for most of 1907. At the time he was 46 yrs. old, his wife was 41 yrs. old, and his adopted daughter was 17 yrs. old.

Although he continued to be listed in the Minneapolis Directory for 1908 and 1909, Hurtt established a new home at 1518 Mohawk in Los Angeles by 1910.

This remained Hurtt’s permanent residence for the remainder of his career. It was a good choice, as by 1920, his next-door neighbor was another former Sosman & Landis artist, Fitch Fulton. Although much older than his neighbor, Hurtt shared many of the same Midwestern connections as his neighbor.

Although Hurtt continued to be listed as a scenic artist in LA Directories, his easel art remained a constant in various gallery exhibitions. He even received a bronze medal at the Southern California Art Exhibition, Southern California Panama Exposition, 1915 San Diego. In 1918 he was included in the publication “Who’s Who in Art,” listed as an illustrator with a brief biography:

Hurtt, Arthur R., 1518 Mohawk St. Los Angeles, CA.

P., L.- Born in Wisconsin, Oct 31, 1861

Pupil of Douglas Volk. Member: Cal. AC. Award: Bronze medal, Pan-Cal. Exp., San Diego, 1915” (p. 519). Other former scenic Sosman & Landis scenic artists in the publication included: Thomas G. Moses P. Member, Walter C. Hartson, Frank C. Peyraud, and Victor Higgins.

Concerning Hurtt’s scenic work in California, he became associated with E. H. Flagg. Both his 1916 and 1918 LA Directory listing noted E. H. Flagg Scenic Co. as his employer. I have written about this well-known firm in the past, as several former Sosman & Landis employees also worked for Flagg over the years.

Edwin H. Flagg, from March 12, 1919, Los Angeles Evening Post.

1921 advertisement for Flagg’s studio.

There is much of Hurtt’s Californian life and career that remains unknown. I have also yet to locate anything about his adopted daughter after 1904. What I do know is that Hurtt passed away in relative obscurity.  After living a life where so many adventures published in the news, his obituary was quite brief.

On 11 Jan 1938 The Los Angeles Times announced: “HURTT, At 1518 Mohawk street, Arthur R, Hurtt, beloved husband of Winifred Hurtt. Funeral services today at 10 a.m. from the chapel of W. A. Brown, 1815 South Flower street” (p. 40)

Although a few of Hurtt’s artworks are listed in online sales, there are precious few examples of his painting. This is what makes his street scene so very significant. It is likely the last remaining example of Hurtt’s scenic art legacy.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana, Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, Jan. 7-15, 2024.

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

The Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana when we left work on January 13, 2024.

On January 7, 2024, I drove from Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. My project was to catalogue a portion of the vast scenery collection at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana. Located in southeastern Iowa, this unique museum is “dedicated to the preservation of memorabilia and artifacts of early repertoire theatre.”

Here is a link to their website http://thetheatremuseum.com/

The Theatre Museum resulted from a memorabilia exhibit displayed at the Midwest Old Threshers Reunion and Iowa Wesleyan College in 1970. Local enthusiasm fueled discussions to build a Theatre Museum on Old Thresher Reunion show grounds. On September 1, 1973, the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana was dedicated, and is currently situated at the north end of the show grounds. I. must mention that most of the credit for this entire endeavor goes to the promotional efforts of Caroline Schaffner (Neil & Caroline Schaffner Players), Jimmy Davis (6-yrs. member and 35-yrs. owner of the Schaffner Players), Helen Virden, and Joe Mauck.

The exterior of the Theatre Musuem is intended to simulate a nineteenth-century opera house.

My photograph of the Theatre Museum Building, March 2017.

Over the years, a variety of theatre artifacts were donated to the museum, necessitating two major renovations. In 2000, the Caroline Schaffner Research Library was added to the building. This archival space is packed full of rare scripts, correspondence, tour schedules, production photos, and a large collection of videotaped interviews with performers describing their touring experiences.

There is much, much more to discuss about the Theatre Museum’s origin, but I am going to pause here.

Displays at the Theatre Museum include a variety of scenery, costumes, machinery, touring trunks, play bills, show cards, advertising sheets, playbills, musical instruments, and more. Here are a few photographs of museum displays from my most recent visit.

Display cases in front of two 1875 shutters painted by Harry Dressel for Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa.

Interior book flat delivered by Iowa scenic artist Jesse Cox in front of an Ad Drop painted by Iowa scenic artist Hugh Lanning (for the Blakesburg Opera House) in 1905.

There are many aspects that make this museum that make it internationally significant. However, it is their association with the Midwest Old Threshers Reunion (Old Threshers) that I find the most remarkable.

To clarify this relationship: Old Threshers owns the museum, but it is run by a museum board.

(Click here for more information about the upcoming Reunion)

Now you may wonder, “What is an old threshers reunion?”  Let’s start with a thresher. A thresher, or threshing machine, beats the kernels from grain heads. This is a necessary step in the process of preparing grain for market. In the Midwest, many farmers gathered their resources to hire a threshing machine at harvest time. Threshing was an annual, or bi-annual, affair (depending on region) that gathered communities together for a common purpose. The result of their labors made it possible to ship large amounts of grain to flour mills and other processing plants across the country. For those who want to know about the evolution of the thresher, here is a link: https://www.farmcollector.com/steam-traction/evolution-of-the-thresher/

A Minneapolis Threshing Machine in front of chaff (the covering and other debris separated from the kernal when threshing grain).

Harnessing a steam engine’s power.

Although this is a far cry from current agricultural practices, it marked a culturally significant events for farmers. Threshing reunions celebrate agricultural technology from the nineteenth-century through mid-twentieth century. In addition to tractors and farming equipment these shows feature other aspects of farm life, including innovative technology and cultural artifacts from metropolitan areas too.

Also referred to a “steam shows,” the main feature are rows of tractors, with the earliest examples powered by steam. There is nothing quite like watching a massive steam tractor slowly puff across a field or power a threshing machine. It is a multi-sensory experience that instantaneously transports you back to another time and place. It provides contexts for all those American History classes that examined rural communities. If the show grounds include a steam engine that puffs along on a few miles of track, old-time music, vintage-clothing style show, it is magical.

I have been a member of the Western Minnesota Steam Threshers Reunion (WMSTR) since 1972. Here is their link and a few pictures from 2023: https://rollag.com/

My son and mother playing music in the WMSTR mercantile building, 2023.

My dad and husband working as conductors on the 353.

My dad has been the WMSTR Hobo for three decades.

Sadly, both WMSTR and the Midwest Old Threshers hold their reunions at the same time – on Labor Day Weekend.

Threshing shows are extremely affordable, with a four-day pass costing approximately $30.00. Both volunteers and visitors often camp on, or near, the show grounds for the entire event. This creates a tight-knit community over the years, fostering many life-long friendships.

Threshing shows offer something for everyone in the family, but the inclusion of a theatre museum makes the Midwest Old Threshers Reunion unique.  As in days past, the museum offers respite to those weary from spending the day outside. In fact, it is a natural pairing that many fail to realize; the bringing of theatrical entertainment to rural activities.

As America’s network of transportation expanded throughout the second half of the nineteenth century, performance venues rapidly appeared throughout the Midwestern States and Western Territories. Scenery was delivered to stages in buildings titled Opera House, Opera Hall, Academy of Music, Museum, and Atheneum. Town halls, city halls, lodge rooms, saloons, and academic institutions. These spaces included stages, often with complete sets of scenery. The construction of a stage, regardless of the building’s name, signaled the success of a rural community. It signified that there was a social space to not only host a variety of community events, but also serve the needs of touring entertainments. For farming families, it was an opportunity to connect with their neighbors and in-town residents. Overall, it fostered the sense of community and provided a network of support for many individuals otherwise isolated on distant homesteads.

The Theatre Museum’s scenery collection includes scenery dating as early as 1875.  Painted compositions for the stage feature the works of many well-known studios, including Sosman & Landis, Kansas City Scenic Co., Twin City Scenic Company, Joy & Cannon Scenic Company, and Universal Scenic Company. Some pieces are even signed and dated, signifying the only surviving scenic artworks by well-known scenic artist’s Arthur R. Hurtt and Harry Dressel. There is also an extensive collection of the Diamond Dye scenery painted Jesse Cox, founder of Cox Scenic Studios in Estherville, Iowa. The Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana houses the greatest variety of late-nineteenth century and early-twentieth century scenery on display in North America.

Studio label on back of a drop recently documented at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Jesse Cox’s paint table on display in front of a dye drop.

During my stay, I documented far more than 50 drops, and there are dozens of wings and interior flats to go, with some dating as early as 1875. Despite, two blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, the trip was extremely successful.  Keep in mind, that I was born and raised in Minnesota. I am very familiar with driving in near white-out conditions and have snow tires on my car. However, I am always hesitant to put myself in harm’s way on a winter road.

On Sunday, January 7, 2024, I drove from Minneapolis, MN, to the home of my host in Washington, Iowa, where I stayed at the home of Theatre Museum president, Monie Hayes.

He was my timeline for the week:

Day 1: On Monday, January 8, we both drove the 40-min. trip to Mt. pleasant, Iowa. That day we were able to unroll and document ten drops. Our primary focus was unlabeled scenery stored in the basement, above the stage and on the walls. The basement of the museum is another display area with small stage.

Day 2: On Tuesday, January 9, the first blizzard hit, dumping about 15” of snow where I was staying. It was an intense storm system that paused and spiraled around Washington. We called work off for that day, so I started compiling my report. Sadly, this delay meant extending my stay.

Screen shot of my weather app radar on Jan. 9, 2024.

Day 3: On Wednesday, January 10, I drove down the Mt. Pleasant, where we repeated the process, slowly unrolling, or unfolding, one scene at a time.

Day 4: On Thursday, January 11, I relocated to the home of another board members, Leigh Bradley, in Mt. Pleasant. I needed to be in town and not commute 40 minutes to an from the job site. My decision was based on the forecast of another blizzard. This storm was now combined with sub-zero temperatures. Iowa had again issued a no-tow order, meaning that travel was at your own risk; tow trucks would not be sent out to rescue stranded cars. As I was now staying only a few miles away from the Museum, we continued cataloguing scenery.  The second storm was scheduled to start at 9PM that evening. After work, we all headed out to dinner at a local restaurant. These are the moments that make everything worthwhile; getting to know the people who are passionate about preserving there scenery collection.

Part of the week-long team included Richard Finkelstein. He had driven 14 hours to join me on site and photograph this remarkable collection.  As always, I am amazed with Richard’s talent, knowledge, and generosity.  It was such a delight to work with him again. Our last project was at the Scottish Rite in Richmond, Virginia when I packed up and moved that Masonic scenery collection to Tucson, Arizona, in January 2021.

Richard Finkelstein working at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Wendy Waszut-Barrett and Richard Finklestein at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Our workspace in the basement. Platforms and chairs were moved in the auditorium to lay out the backdrops.

Signature on corner of a Front Curtain (shown above), painted at the Twin City Scenic Co. in 1915.

Days 5 and 6: The back-to-back winter storm and second blizzard warnings for January 12 and 13 meant that there were only two volunteers who could show up. In many ways, these were my two favorite days on site.

Day 7: By Sunday morning, I recognized that I was going to be stranded in Mt. Pleasant another day. Again, there was a no-tow order, and I was unwilling to chance the 5-hrs. drive north; some roads were still impassible due to snow and ice.

Day 8: In the end, I left early Monday morning, and made it home by late afternoon. The anticipated 5-hrs. drive lasted much longer due to poor road conditions and slow speeds.

Iowa roads after the storms on January 15, 2024.

Here are a few images from my adventure.

1875 Shutter painted by Chicago scenic artist, Harry Dressel, for Steyer’s Opera House in Decorah, Iowa.

Detail from a drawing on the backside of Dressel’s shutter.

Detail of Grand Drapery Border paint by Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio, delivered to Mineral Point, Wisconsin.

Painted detail from dye drop painted by Jesse Cox of Estherville, Iowa.

Painted detail from dye drop painted by Jesse Cox of Estherville, Iowa.

Painted detail delivered the the Quoque Community Hall in Long Island, New York.

Painted detail by Sosman & Lanids studio artists for the ZCBJ Lodge Hall Front Curtain in Oxford Junction, Iowa.

Painted detail from a “Yankee Doodle” scene used by the Jack & Maude Brooks Stock Co.

Painted detail from a 1918 Ad Drop.

Stage screw and stage jack on display the the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana.

Border lights from the Blakesburg Opera House on display at the Theatre Museum.

The next few posts will explore some of the more significant scenery in the collection, starting with Arthur R. Hurtt’s street scene. I am posting some of my research while I complete condition reports, replacement appraisals, and a Collections Care Management document for the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana. In an effort to generate support for the Theatre Museum, I will share some of the most significant artifacts in the scenery collection.

Please consider becoming a member of the Theatre Museum. The annual fee is only $20 ($15 for students). Your support sends a message to the Midwest Old Thresher’s Reunion and the Mt. Pleasant Community that the Theatre Museum is important and should remain open. Here is the link to contribute: http://thetheatremuseum.com/membership

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 859 – Jesse Cox, Scenic Artist

Copyright © 2019 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Much has been written about Jesse Cox, the scenic artist purported to be the inventor of the Diamond Dye process for scenery. Cox’s obituary even credits the artist as the “originator of commercial dye painted scenery for theatrical productions.” His obituary details Cox’s process that involved mixing dye with warm water, making it “possible for scenery to be much lighter in weight and transported more conveniently.” I highly doubt that Cox was the first scenic artist to use commercial dyes on scenery, especially when looking at his birthdate and timeline. However, I do believe that he popularized the process, if only through sheer self-promotion.

Jesse Cox sitting in one of his sets. Image from Michael Kramme’s “Palimpset” article “Opera House Illusions: Jesse Cox and Theatrical Scenery” (Vol. 71, No. 4, pages 154-172).
Jesse Cox. Image from Michael Kramme’s “Palimpset” article “Opera House Illusions: Jesse Cox and Theatrical Scenery” (Vol. 71, No. 4, pages 154-172).

There is also no question that the Diamond Dye manufacturers would have been thrilled to have Cox as a poster boy for their company, however there is no clear evidence that suggests Cox was the inventor of the process. Even the Jesse Cox Scenic Company’s early twentieth-century catalogue makes no mention of their specializing in dye scenery or Cox’s reputation as the inventor of this unique scene painting process.  I have to wonder when the Diamond Dye process of painting scenery became specifically associated with this artist, as the earliest mention that I have uncovered to date is 1936. To all indications, Cox’s story was shared at a time when he was reflecting on his own history, and contributions to the world of scenic art. I am reminded of the erroneous credit given to Lee Lash for his invention of the ad drop. Over time, facts blur and history is carefully shaped by those who gain the most from its telling.

Here is a little background about Cox that was included in his 1961 obituary:

Jesse Matthew Cox was born on March 3, 1878, in Seneca, Illinois, the son of Mr. and Mrs. Spencer Cox. One of five sons born to the couple. His eldest brother was James, and his younger brothers were George, Chauncy and Spencer Jr. The family moved to Estherville in 1891. At the time, Jesse was at the age of 13 years old. Initially, he worked for his father, but soon became interested within the next three years, going on the road as an actor at the age of 16.  He initially toured with the [Warren G.] Noble Dramatic Shows of Chariton.  As many young performers involved with touring productions at the time, Cox also performed as a musician and assisted in other technical duties. It was while on tour that Cox became interested in scene painting, likely out of the company’s necessity for additional settings. There is no indication that he became a scenic artist by going through any traditional training or apprenticeship program.

After touring, Cox worked as an itinerant artist in Chicago, Minneapolis and St. Paul, spending several seasons in the Twin Cities. It is reported that Cox returned to Estherville to settle down, painting “great quantities of scenery” there and shipping much of it to California and Texas. Local newspapers cite that his return to Estherville coincided with the decline of demand for road shows. In Estherville, Cox started a scene painting studio in the old Lough opera house, the same venue where he once worked as a prop boy before going on the road with Noble. Cox had little luck with studio locations throughout the duration of his career, as the first was destroyed by fire and the second razed by a tornado. Cox’s third studio was located at 606 N. 12th St. There he worked with his son Robert, primarily making scenery for theaters and high schools, but also completed many sign painting projects. The firm’s business gradually expanded to include neon signs. His company continually diversified as the demand for painted scenery continued to decline. This was the case with most scenic studios that survived the Great Depression. In regard to neon signs produced by the studio, in 1942 the Estherville Daily News announced, “The Jesse Cox studio has been busy the past week building the first complete neon sign to be fabricated in Estherville” (22 Sept 1942, page 1). The sign was made for the Hossack Motor Company.

Cox’s scenic art and performance career was supplemented with entertainment news. He and his brother George established and edited the Opera House Reporter, an entertainment industry trade paper, from 1898 to 1907. In the greater scheme of things the establishment of the publication coincides with his development of the Diamond Dye process and touring on the road. The dates just don’t add up when compared to newspaper accounts. The Opera House Reporter included a variety of information, such as office reports from theaters and general theatre advertisements. The Cox brothers are also credited with running the first movie projector in the state of Iowa. They were quite an innovative and busy pair.

Of his personal life, Cox was twice married, first to Mabel Gerberick and second to Carrie Beaty in 1939.

Cox died at the age of 83, a longtime businessman and member of the Estherville City Council. His health was failing for some time, with his passing being attributed to the “complications of advanced age.” Cox was an active member with the Knights of Pythias and the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks.  His assumed high offices in each fraternity, with achieving the Elk’s rank of Exalted Ruler.

Cox’s professional and personal memorabilia are on display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. Even his accordion is on display. The museum’s library includes an article written in 1990 by Michael Kramme for Palimpset, a publication advertised as Iowa’s popular history magazine (Winter issue). His article “Opera House Illusions: Jesse Cox and Theatrical Scenery” was included in Vol. 71, No. 4 (pages 154-172). Kramme credits Cox as “the inventor of a system of painting theatrical scenery that revolutionized the industry.” Unfortunately Kramme gives no specific technical information or dates to support this statement. Again, I question the legitimacy of Cox’s claim to fame as the inventor of the dye system of painting scenery.

The earliest mention that I encountered in my research describing Cox’s dye process is in an article from the Estherville Enterprise on 9 Sept. 1936 (page 2).  The article reports, “There is a very interesting story connected with the [Jesse Cox Scenic Studio]. Jesse Cox, the owner and operator, when a very young man was a trouper with Nobles’ Stock company for seven years. While following the road and assisting in handling massive curtains, Mr. Cox conceived the idea of painting scenery with diamond dyes. These could be folded and packed in a trunk and were much easier to carry. During the summer of 1899 Mr. Noble sent Mr. Cox to Estherville on pay and in the old low opera house, the young man designed and painted the first diamond dye scenery, now popular the world over. Later Mr. Cox closed with the Noble Company and started the business of scenery painting. He has shipped scenery to every state in the Union and from New York City to San Francisco can be found scenery labeled in the corner, The Jesse Cox Scenic Studio, Estherville, Iowa. The largest scene Mr. Cox ever panted was 24 x 150 feet for the Robinson Bro. Circus. Many of the largest traveling companies have used Mr. Cox’s scenery but the outstanding feature is the fact that he conceived the idea of diamond dye scenery which is now used extensively throughout the world.”

My research does not suggest that Diamond Dyes were that extensively used for scenery production in the United States at the time.

What I found interesting, however, is that the 1900 census lists Cox’s profession as “actor” and not “artist” or “scene painter,” as was the case with other scenic artists at the time. By 1900, he was editing the Opera House Reporter and supposedly running a scenic studio, as well as working in other cities throughout the Midwest.

In Kramme’s article he describes, “Cox developed and patented a process of painting scenery with heated dye rather than paint.” However, some of his scenery on display at the Theatre Museum is clearly painted with dry pigment and his paint table has pots of dry pigment too. In terms of a patent, there is a Jesse Cox that designed a hay knife. There are quite a few “Jesse Cox” individuals living at the same time in the United States. Kramme goes on to explain, “His technique remained a trade secret. But the result, vivid color that would not peel, crack, or rub off, was shared nation-wide as owners of opera houses and managers of acting companies bought lavish sets of scenery.” I am perplexed that his use of Diamond Dyes on cotton sheeting would require any trade secret. The preparation for dyes in scene painting is pretty consistent.  Furthermore, aniline dyes had been around for a while and were widely used in the theatre industry for variety of effects. By the 1860s chemical aniline dyes were readily available. The process for preparing dye to use in scenic art is not like dying yarn or clothing fabrics where different mordants baths shift final color results when fixing the dye.

Jesse Cox’s paint table with containers of dry pigment. Image from Michael Kramme’s “Palimpset” article “Opera House Illusions: Jesse Cox and Theatrical Scenery” (Vol. 71, No. 4, pages 154-172).

I also have to point out an alternative to dye in theatrical scenery. When applied properly, and in thin coats, dry pigments result in vivid colors that will not peel, crack or rub off. The English practice of glazing scenery results in lightweight and foldable scenery. See past posts that distinguish between the two schools of scenic art that were established in the United States. When using thin coats of dry pigment, the fabric remains pliable. I known this first hand because the scenery that I transported to Europe this summer in my luggage was folded and crushed during transport without any harm to the painted composition or permanent wrinkles.  The only problem is when dry pigment is applied in thick coats or with strong size water. Thick coats of paint also make scenery heavy to transport.

Keep in mind that there are historic scenes well over a hundred years old whose colors remain stable and can easily be folded without irreparable damage. It all depends on the application coat and strength of the binder at time of manufacture and subsequent environmental conditions. The biggest threat for scenery painted with dry pigment and diluted hide glue remains water damage and high humidity, ultimately causing the breakdown of the binder and reactivating the paint. This causes as much damage as poor preparation of colors or size during the initial painting of each scene. Not every scenic artist or potboy thoroughly understood the preparation of paint or binder. In many instances, corners were cut, and the life expectancy of the scene was ephemeral at best. I always think of the Demotivator © poster defining the word mediocrity: “It takes a lot less time and most people won’t notice the difference until it’s too late.”

From https://despair.com/collections/demotivators

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 858: Jesse Cox and the Diamond Dye Process

Copyright © 2019 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

It seems an appropriate time to explore the history of the scenic artist who some consider the inventor of the diamond dye process for scenery. Now is a good opportunity to unwrap Jesse Cox’s purported contribution to theatre history and his scenic art process. 

In 1983, Mrs. Neil Schaffner, curator of the Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, wrote a letter to Dr. John Rothgeb at the University of Texas. In his request for information about the scenic artist Jesse Cox, she wrote the following:

“In answer will say, am happy to furnish some information Re – Jesse Cox, Scenic Artist, some say the ‘Inventor f a Diamond Dye Process for painting Stage Scenery,’ head of the Jesse Cox Scenic Studio in Estherville, beginning in the 1890s.  This museum is proud of the donation of Jesse Cox’s Paint Bench, bowls, etc. used in the diamond dye process, plus framed paintings, which he then transferred to the canvas drops as well as much documentary materials. A most unique display. The above was donated by his son, Robert Cox, of Estherville.”

Jesse Cox display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.
Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.
Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

On my way to USITT in St. Louis, I made a point of stopping by the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. The unique display of Cox’s paint table, dry pigment, dyes, glue warmer and painting tools is certainly worth the trip. The docent who led my private tour during their off season, was a wealth of information about tent shows, but really did not understand Cox’s artifacts or the scenic art painting process. The big talking point, however, was that Cox invented dye painting on scenery.

The paint on display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, is dry pigment. There are some containers of dye in his paint trunk and a Diamond Dye cabinet on the wall.

I was intrigued that someone would “invent” a scenic art process so late in the game (turn of the twentieth century), so decided to do a little research. Lets start out with Diamond Dyes.

Diamond Dye, part of Wells, Richardson & Co. of Burlington, Vt., boasted a national presence by the 1880s. In 1885, a chromolithograph advertisement promised that Diamond Dyes “have no equal” and were the simplest, strongest and fastest; “a child could use them.” Wells, Richardson & Co distributed sample cards and “full directions for dyeing all kinds of goods, color photographs, &c., and making inks, wood stains, bluing &c., &c., sent free by the proprietor.” That this dye product would not be considered for theatrical scenery during this same time is unrealistic.

Part of the Jesse Cox display at the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

So what makes a product indispensable, especially one that expresses such versatility? Availability.  In 1915, The Practical Druggist included the article reported, “Diamond Dyes are unquestionably staple goods for druggists” in the article “The Druggists Look Forward to the Publication of a new ‘Diamond Dye Annual and Direction Book.’”

The article continues:

“For more than thirty-five years no drug store could claim a complete stock unless it carries a full supply of Diamond Dyes. These famous household necessities hold certain year-in-and-year-out profits for retail druggists. Each year the makers of Diamond Dyes, Wells & Richardson Company of Burlington, Vt. publish a book – ‘The Diamond Dye Annual and Direction Book.’ ‘The Diamond Dye Annual and Direction Book’ is handsomely printed on a good grade of paper; illustrations are by competent artists, and the book is written by a corps of experts on the subject of dyeing.  Probably one of the most valuable features of ‘The Diamond Dye Annual’ is the testimony of a great many women who have used Diamond Dyes with complete success every year. Some clever women discover new uses to which Diamond Dyes may be put. The makers of Diamond Dyes quickly seize upon these suggestions and spread the news to women throughout the country. This they do by using big advertising space in magazines, newspapers and through ‘The Diamond Dye Annual and Direction Book.’”

Any enterprising scenic artist who discovered an affordable alternative to dry pigment, such as Diamond Dyes, would be an immediate benefit to both the company and himself. This new use accentuated the versatility of Wells, Richardson & Company’s signature product.

The article concludes with, “The success of the Wells & Richardson Company, which began in a very small way and grew to mammoth proportions through steady, consistent, heavy advertising, holds a lesson for every retail druggist in the country. No better object lesson of the truth of the saying, ‘It pays to advertise,” could be found that the phenomenal sale of Diamond Dyes.’ The general manager of the Wells & Richardson Company, Mr. George M. Besett, recently said in an interview: ‘We are making and selling a household necessity. There is no woman in the country – no matter how large her bank account – who can afford to discard clothes merely because their color has gone out of fashion or because they no longer please her.’ 

I think of the many high school theatre students that are provided latex paint – because it is readily available from lumber stores and perceived as cheaper (no exorbitant shipping fees). Similarly, at the turn of the twentieth century, Diamond Dyes were readily available at local drug stores because they were manufactured for a different purpose, like latex paint for residential uses.  Just as there is a distinct difference between backdrops created with residential latex paint and those created with dry pigment or scenic paint, so was there a different between drops created with created with dye and those created with scenic paint. Then, just as now, the majority of the audience members could not tell the difference. 

The color palette of dyes is remarkably similar to the dry pigment palette, or any fine art palette.

Regardless of whether Cox was the first scenic artist to use Diamond Dye for a theatrical scenery or whether he just popularized it, the process was ideal for touring vaudeville acts and tent shows.  Unless the production was dependent on scenic illusion, the Diamond Dye process to paint scenery was brilliant.  Again, the dye product was readily available in many small towns and the process facilitated the easier transportation of lightweight scenery.

Tomorrow I will look at the individual credited with creating the Diamond Dye process for scenery – Jesse Cox.

Jesse Cox

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Acquiring The Fort Scott Scottish Rite Scenery for the Minnesota Masonic Heritage Center, part 78.

On the Road Again

I spiraled into a deep depression after seeing the damaged scenery at the Minnesota Masonic Heritage Center during the Singers in Accord concert. I can always channel anger into some creative project, but devastation and despair shut down my spirit and productivity. Regardless of all desire to simply curl up into a fetal position and stay in bed each day, I focused on the upcoming deadline for the Santa Fe Scottish Rite book and I threw myself into this project. I was working as the Volume Editor and a contributor for both the Scottish Rite Theater essay and the Santa Fe Scottish Rite timeline. Some days it was a balm for my spirit. Here was a Scottish Rite Valley that would survive and its members understood the significance of their scenery collection. It was the beginning of March and I desperately anticipated my departure for USITT (United States Institute of Theatre Technology). This year, the theatre conference was taking place in St Louis, Missouri.

In addition to attending the conference, I planned to evaluate two Scottish Rite collections on the trip, as well as stop by the Theatre Museum of Repertoire Americana in Mount Pleasant, Iowa, on my drive down to St. Louis. Surprisingly, I was most excited about the theatre museum as it had been on my “bucket list” for over a decade.

Although the museum was currently closed for the season, I scheduled a private tour with one of the local volunteers. Her name was Monie and we were both excited to meet each other after having had several phone conversations. We both shared an interest in Steam Shows and theatre history – a winning combination if ever there was one! I don’t know what I was expecting, but the little brick opera house next to the Steam Threshers Reunion grounds genuinely surprised me. It was adorable. Since 1972, I had attended the Western Minnesota Steam Threshers Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota – it was one of my family’s annual traditions. For me, a Steam Show AND a Theatre Museum were an ideal combination that made me contemplate defecting to this city every Labor Day weekend instead of our annual trip up to Rollag, Minnesota. By the way, “steam thresher reunion” refers to threshing machines connected to a steam engine.

Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota. The steam engine that circles the grounds.

A line up of steam engines at the Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota.

The 353 pulling up to Main Street with the farm in the background. Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota.

My mother accompanying my husband and daughter in the Mercantile. Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota.

My mother playing in the Mercantile at the Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota.

My father and son riding the rails at the Western Minnesota Steam Thresher Reunion in Rollag, Minnesota.

The Theatre Museum posted very little information about their contents other than advertising “a unique collection of memorabilia from early American popular entertainment. Stage drops, playbills, scrapbooks, costumes, scenery, artifacts, scripts and music scores dating from the 1850s.” Here is the current link: http://www.oldthreshers.org/index.cfm/?pageID=81 The new website should be up and running soon at www.thetheatremuseum.com

Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

My guide for the theatre museum tour in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

The Theatre Museum exhibits were packed full of artifacts and little displays, all backed by historic backdrops that had been used for tent shows from the 1850s to the 1950s. The museum was created in 1973 and hundreds of theatre folk had donated memorabilia since then. There was one thing in particular that made the entire trip worthwhile for me, a display on the painting table and scenic art materials of Jesse Cox (1878-1961). Cox was the generation of scenic artists immediately after Thomas Moses. Born in Seneca, Illinois, he moved to Estherville in 1891. By 1894, he went on the road with Noble Dramatic Shows of Chariton and that was when he became interested in a scenic art career.

Cox is credited with being the originator of the Diamond Dye process for stage scenery (mixing dye with warm water to make it much lighter in weight and transported more conveniently). The exhibit on Cox includes his paint bench, bowls, brushes and other products used in the diamond dye process, plus some of his designs. I was in heaven!

Jesse Cox scenic art display at the theatre museum in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Dry pigment bowls on Jesse Cox’s paint table at the theatre museum in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Scenic art brushes owned by Jesse Cox on display at the theatre museum in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Backdrops on display at the theatre museum in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Diamond dyes to use for painting touring show scenery. Mt. Pleasant theatre museum.

Jesse Cox played the accordion too!

I could have spent hours carefully looking at and documenting each color, bowl and brush. This was a place where I would have to return someday, hopefully with colleagues and other scenic art students. It was an absolute treasure! This display was almost similar to what I had envisioned for a few of the personal artifacts of Thomas Moses at the Minnesota Masonic Heritage Center; it would accompany his scenery collection from Fort Scott. Remember, the theatre at the Minnesota Masonic Heritage Center was to be a working museum, an extension of the central museum and not just a rental space. Each area in the MMHC complex had been proposed as museum extensions, including the library and the lodge room. In these various areas, there would be a series of rotating artifacts that would encourage repeat visits by the general public and Masonic groups.

I had recommended that the Moses exhibit go between the entry doors of the Ives theatre. That display would include where the historic scenery collection originated and the scenic artist, Thomas Gibbs Moses. His Masonic cap, painter sweater, paint brush, charcoal sticks, and glue pot were just a few artifacts in the 4’ x 6’ display case. People who entered the theater would have the opportunity to understand the unique collection representing a shared cultural heritage between the Fraternity and the general public. The CEO had explained during the Spring of 2016 that there simply wasn’t enough money to create a Moses’ exhibit – maybe later. Instead, the CEO had selected a printed reproduction of an existing mural at the George Washington Masonic Memorial in Alexandria, Virginia.

Thomas Moses’ sweater that I discovered in Fort Scott, Kansas at the Scottish Rite theatre.

Charcoal used to draw out composition of Fort Scott drops that I discovered onsite at the Scottish Rite theatre.

Scenic art brush used to paint the Fort Scott drops that we discovered onsite at the Scottish Rite theatre.

Moses’ paint cap that we discovered onsite at the Scottish Rite theatre.

Now with an unsightly and damaged scenery collection, the possibility of providing any artistic provenance connected with Moses for this internationally significant scenery collection in any display seemed impossible.

To be continued…