Theatre Terminology – Drypigment.net

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Gaiety Theatre Act Drop by William T. Hemsley.

Throughout my career, I have encountered examples of scenic art that took my breath away. My most recent experience occurred during a visit to the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House in Douglas, Isle of Man.

The act-drop, painted by William Thompson Hemsley (1850-1918), is exquisite.

Photograph by Mike Hume while I am attempting to document painted details.

It is obvious that Hemsley was at the peak of his painting career when he produced this large-scale artwork. Hemsley’s economy of brush stroke and color combinations are quite remarkable. In fact, they are inspirational. Seeing this drop should be on every scenic artist’s bucket list. You will learn so much about the brevity of scene painting when examining his work.

Detail of dancer’s foot in W. T. Hemsley’s act drop at the Gaiety Theatre.

This post will examine Hemsley’s drop in detail, placing it within the context of theatre history. It will also examine its current condition and past repairs. My next post will look at the life and career of scenic artist W. T. Hemsley (1850-1918). Then I will continue with my last two theater visits in the UK during September 2023.

As with most front curtains for Victorian performance venues, Hemsley’s design for the Gaiety Theatre unifies the auditorium’s color palette and décor. Although the central subject exhibits an exotic eastern theme, the painted surround seamlessly blends with the architectural surround and auditorium designed by Frank Matcham.

Detail of painted curtain next to proscenium arch.

Detail of painted curtain next to proscenium arch.

I am going to briefly touch on theatre terminology first. Hemsley’s “act drop” design is identical to many “drop curtain” designs in the North America. Drop curtains, also labeled in the US as front curtains and main rags, were frequently lowered in between acts, unless an advertising curtain was employed. In many cases the terms act-drop, drop curtain, painted front curtain, and main rag can be used interchangeably. Terminology is based on where you live. It is very important to not get caught up in the name, but to look at the actual function of the scenic piece. I think of the dispute between “hot dish” and “casserole” in the United States. They are both a one-dish meal, baked in the oven. Same thing, different name.

Back to the act drop…

This type of scenic design frequently includes a central “painting” – one that often replicates a popular artwork or subject matter. This central “artwork” is surrounded by an ornate frame, draped in lush fabrics. These drop curtains were often the pinnacle of an auditorium’s décor, tying everything together while concealing the magical realm behind the footlights. As audience members waited in their seats for the show to start, or the next act to commence, the drop curtain (act-drop) provided theatre patrons with an opportunity to study the grand work of a scenic artist. The proscenium opening became a gallery wall, providing many scene painters with an opportunity to flaunt their artistic abilities. Painting a successful drop curtain required extensive skill, as well as a thorough understanding of distemper painting techniques for landscapes, architecture, draperies, and, in some cases, figure painting.

There is an article entitled, “Well-known drop curtains in Philadelphia, published in The Philadelphia Inquirer on Dec. 18, 1894.” It examines the significance and subject matter of drop curtains at the time. The article describes the work of Matt Morgan, Russell Smith, William M. Voegtlin, Alfred Voegtlin, Hugh Logan Reid, E. H. Chase, Lee Lash, Gaspard Maeder, and Frederick Schaefer, are featured in the article. Here is an excerpt from the article:

“The drop curtain is the most expensive piece of furniture in any playhouse. Managers are most solicitous about the care of a handsome drop curtain than almost any other appointment in the theatres. They are usually painted by the artists of wide fame in the peculiar branch of art which they represent, whose charges for the work range from $1000 to $3000…It is claimed by managers that a handsome drop curtain has much to do with the drawing qualities of the house. A charming landscape depicting the greenest of lawns, sparking fountains, rare shrubbery and bright flowers, the dimpled surface of a placid lake, with magnificent hills or rugged mountains in the distance to kiss the brightest fleecy clouds, forms an ensemble well calculated to put the audience in good humor to witness a play. And when let down between the acts, it has a tendency to calm the soul after turbulent passages and rouses it to cheerfulness after tearful ones.”

Only a small percentage of historic backdrops that I have documented include figures, especially on those dubbed drop curtains. Most recently, I documented an 1897 drop curtain for the Forum Theatre in Bronzeville, Illinois (a community on the south-side of Chicago). The forum scene depicts very small figures to suggest the scale of their monumental surroundings.

Painted detail from Sosman & Landis drop curtain at the Forum in Bronzeville.

My hand showing scale of the figures on the Forum drop curtain.

The inclusion of larger, or full-scale figures, is extremely rare in extant scenery collections. In fact, the only times that I have consistently encountered figure-work is painted on scenes at Scottish Rite Theatres; specifically, group scenes for 18^th degree productions. For context, many North American Freemasons theatrically stage their “degree work”, like a morality play. It is performed for the educational purposes of members. Here are a few examples from Scottish Rite scenes for context.

Painted scene by Toomey & Volland Studio (St. Louis, Missouri) at the Masonic Theatre in Deadwood, South Dakota.

Painted scene by Toomey & Volland (St. Louis, Missouri) at the Masonic Theatre in Quincy, Illinois.

Although some of the work is quite skilled, in some cases there have been few questionable choices. This detail of a foot may simply indicate the speed at which these scenes were painted. Keep in mind that most American scenic studio artists were working in a factory setting to mass-produce painted illusion.

Painted detail from cut-drop created for the Scottish Rite Theatre in McAlester, Oklahoma, c. 1908. This painted scene is now used at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Salina, Kansas, USA.

The Gaiety Theatre act drop holds a unique place in World Theatre History, when considering not only the artistic skill of Hemsley, but also the subject matter.

When I first encountered Hemsley’s design for the Gaiety Theatre, it reminded me of a drop curtain design by scenic artist John Z. Wood (1846-1919). At the time, Wood was working for the Twin City Scenic Co. in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Wood’s design also incorporated a dancing girl. Interesting aside, Wood was born in England and emigrated with his family as a young both, eventually settling in Rochester New York. For more information about Wood and his artistic style, here is a link to one of the many posts that I have written about him: https://drypigment.net/2019/12/10/tales-from-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-john-z-wood-scenic-artist-1846-1919/

Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Painted detail. Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Painted detail. Wood, John Z. “Drop curtain.” University of Minnesota Libraries, Performing Arts Archives., Accessed November 02, 2023.

Wood’s scenic designs are part of an online digital database.Here is the link to the design: https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll116:1819

Sadly, Wood’s central composition is somewhat obscured under a layer of glue; another central design was pasted over this original composition at a later date. The original work was discovered when the Twin City Scenic Company Collection was catalogued, under the supervision of my mentor, Prof. Emeritus, C. Lance Brockman. Between 1999 and 2000, I assigned metadata to each of the artifacts. My familiarity with four scenery collections in the online database has allowed me to help link designs with extant scenery over the years. Here is the link to access the collection in its entirety: https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/search?facet_field=collection_name_s&facets%5Bcollection_name_s%5D%5B%5D=Scenic+Collections

Although I have read descriptions of exotic eastern scenes for Victorian stages, few have survived. Here are some photographs of Hemsley’s act drop so that you can appreciate his skill and attention to detail.

Central dancer.

Dancer’s shoes.

Looking even closer at fabric and brush stroke.

Reclining man.

Hand detail of man in composition.

Detail of frame.

Fabric and frame detail.

Fabric and frame detail.

Painted detail of floral arrangement.

Painted detail of tapestry.

Another painted detail.

Painted fabric next to practical fabric.

Tassel detail.

Hemsley’s act-drop is the first fully-framed drop that I have ever encountered. It also meant that the cleaning of this act drop in the 1990s became problematic. The restoration team requested that the framed piece be relocated upstage and face the paint-frame floor. Roy McMillan describes the process in his book A Full Circle, 100 Years of the Gaiety Theatre and Opera House:

McMillan wrote,

“To carry out the work, the drop had to be removed from its fly-bar at the front of the stage, walked (that is, moving one end forward a few feet while the other remains stationary, then repeating the process with the other end) halfway to the back, rotated through 180 degrees, then re-flown and the cleaning done from the paint frame floor. When Mervin and David were releasing it from its fly-bar onto the floor, the side struts nearly buckled. The canvas ballooned out like a wind -caught sail; a few seconds more of the strain and the drop would have been gone forever…[They] managed to haul it back into its original position on the fly-bar and decided another method would probably be safer. It would, however, take more time.

They fixed the drop by three tie lines along a bar. It was moved back one side at a time, one bar at a time, with both of them clamoring up and down ladders to secure it or to untie it, to the center of the stage. Once there, two of the three ties were released, and the center left alone. The intention was to rotate it, so the painted side faced upstage and be attended to on the paint frame floor. But as they turned it, they realized that it was three inches wider than available. This was not a design feature of the drop or a miscalculation. It was because a bridge between the left and right side of the fly floor gallery had been built at the front of the stage, making it impossible to turn the drop round. This bridge was not in the original theatre and has since been removed to allow the house curtain to rise correctly, but it was very much present at the time. Faced with the choice of cancelling the first project of the restoration, or dropping the act drop onto the floor again, they chose a much more straightforward means of solving the problem. They cut a chunk out of the bridge…Once in position, the backing canvas was removed. On the painted side of the canvas itself, the copper-headed nails that held it to the frame had oxidized and rotted the canvas in the immediate area…Its delicacy meant it had to be repaired in situ and the frame rebuilt around it.”

The preservation of the painted composition is also described in McMillan’s publication. McMillan wrote, “In order to avoid glare when lit by the footlights the drop had to be painted in stage paint. This is a powdered water-paint mixed with size – a sticky, globby gel that serves as a fixative.”

[I am going to pause here to correct this statement. This drop was painted with distemper paint. The distemper painting process necessitates that dry pigment is turned into a paste and placed on the scenic artist’s palette. Some artists in the UK refer to distemper painting as Size Painting. Regardless, during the painting process dry pigment paste is mixed with diluted hide glue (size) on the palette and directly applied to the drop. The size cannot be used as “a sticky, globby gel.” If the size were this consistency, it means that it has been mixed too strong and will dry with a sheen, thus reflecting stage lights. When size it properly mixed, it will not gel, unless a studio is kept at an abnormally cold temperature. In my humble opinion, there is no way, that Hemsley (then at the age of 50 yrs. old) would have made this amateur mistake. If he had, the whole drop would look like the painting were sealed with a gloss coat.

Here is an example of a restoration process that used size that was too strong and formed a sheen.

Scene at Scottish Rite theatre in Louisville, Kentucky.

McMillan continues to describe the restoration process:“However, as it was water-based, if the surface was rubbed, the paint smudged immediately,”

[I must explain that distemper -“water-based”- paint is not subject to dusting unless the binder has failed over time. There are hundreds of extant drops, c. 1900 or earlier, that show no signs of dusting and are stable.]

McMillan continues “To clean it required an intermediary layer between the surface and the restorer’s brush. It was achieved using mulberry tissue paper, infused with a liquid that caused the dirt to soften on the paint surface and stick to the paper, leaving clean paint of the original drop beneath.”

I am curious to know what about the “liquid.” I have cleaned hundreds of historic scenes cannot envision how this process worked. However, it may explain the extensive spotting throughout the composition.

Spotting that looks like small areas of water damage as there are tide lines and pigment loss.

Areas with spotting near the bottom of drop.

Spotting that looks like small areas of water damage as there are tide lines and pigment loss.

In the past, I have removed both surface contaminants and embedded dirt from extant drops. If the pigment is relatively stable (meaning that the binder is still working) surface contaminants are easily removed with low-suction dust extraction, Absorene putty, and/or Absorene sponges.

Example of removing surface contaminants with low-suction dust extraction.

Example of using Absorene sponge to remove surface contaminants left after low-suction dust extraction.

Half of a scene that was cleaned at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Duluth, MN.

If the pigment is severely dusting, the loose paint must be consolidated so that it does not continue to dust. This is when conservators debate whether to remove the dirt and cause minimal pigment loss or encapsulate the dirt when the loose paint is consolidated.

McMillan further explains, “if the surface was rubbed, the paint smudged immediately.”

I don’t really know how to interpret this statement. When distemper paint comes into contact with any liquid, even a damp cloth or humid environment, the paint will immediately reactivate. This is why I don’t understand how “mulberry tissue paper, infused with liquid” works in removing surface contaminants from distemper drops.

If McMillan meant that the distemper paint smudged when dry, that indicates the binder was failing; the pigment dusting from the fabric.

Despite the hard work to preserve Hemsley’s work, the curtain is again compromised. There are a few scrapes that will need attention before the damage spreads, again compromising the longevity of the artwork.

Damage documented during my September 2023 visit. Thankfully, the cause of the scraping has been rememdied.

Detail of the damage.

Theatre backdrops are unique and cannot be preserved like large-scale paintings that hang in stationary positions on gallery walls. They are metamorphic in nature, intended to be constantly handled or shifted. That is magic of painted scenery; artworks that come to life under stage lights.

In early-twentieth-century North America, many stunning act-drops were replaced with fabric draperies, movie screens, or a combination thereof during the twentieth century, the original scenes long forgotten by theatre audiences. Instead of raising a painted curtain to reveal the mysteries of Thespis, heavy draperies were drawn apart to show a movie. The Gaiety Theatre has three front pieces:

Main draperies (that draw apart).

Hemsley’s act drop (also known as a drop curtain).

A contemporary advertising curtain (also known as an ad drop).

It is remarkable how each piece changes the energy in the auditorium. It is certainly a testament to the importance of what fills the proscenium opening.

My next post will be about the creator of the Gaiety Theatre’s act-drop, William T. Hemsley, scenic artist and sculptor.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 1114 – Proscenium Border and Proscenium Wings by Henry C. Tryon, 1883

Nineteenth-century “stage trimmings” referred to painted settings that included drops, wings, shutters, and borders. Stage trimmings also included the proscenium border and wings, both painted elements that accompanied most stage settings regardless of their composition. The proscenium border and proscenium wings were later known as the grand teaser and grand tormentors, or grand tormentor wings. Newspaper descriptions of nineteenth-century proscenium drapery frequently credited the skills of a scenic artist, verifying that theses were painted elements. Often permanently positioned immediately upstage of the proscenium opening, they were only removed for larger spectacles that necessitated the entire stage space, such as acrobatic acts, tightrope walkers, and the like. Otherwise, the proscenium side wings and proscenium borders remained in place for most productions.

*Folding proscenium wings and proscenium border at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado.*

*Folding proscenium wing with practical door at the Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.*

*Painted detail from folding proscenium wing with practical door at the Tabor Opera House, Leadville, Colorado.*

Once the drop curtain was raised for a performance, proscenium wings and borders provided the first layer of masking for any scene. These stage elements also provided a visual transition from painted decor and architectural ornamentation in the auditorium to painted illusion on the stage. They unified the auditorium and stage in historic performance venues. Of all the painted pieces delivered by a scenic artist, these elements were the most viewed by any audience member.
Over time, proscenium wings and borders were replaced with ornate or plain fabric versions, forever altering the audience expectations and the framed presentation of painted illusion. Fabric valances, grand borders, drapes and close-in curtains became standard masking for proscenium openings by 1930; their initial popularity beginning over a decade earlier.
From 1881 to 1883, Tryon delivered new stock scenery for the Tabor Grand Opera House and Tivoli Theatre in Denver, Colorado, as well as the Springville Theatre Hall and Salt Lake Theatre in Utah. These were just four examples of the hundreds of theatres stocked with scenery painted by Tryon throughout the duration of his career. The stock scenery collections were produced over time, with each piece being unveiled to the public as part of a setting for a touring show or local production.
On May 21, 1882, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” credited Tryon with the new scenery for the Tivoli Theatre in Denver. Of the scenic appointments, the article reported, “The stage trimmings will be of the most handsome and costly character. Mr. Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of the Tabor Grand Opera house, Denver, having charge of the work, which will be finished in good season for the grand opening Monday evening” (page 3). Advertisements promised “Complete set of new scenery! From the brush of Henry C. Tryon, scenic artist of the Tabor Grand” (“Colorado Daily Chieftain,” May 24, 1882). By June 1, 1882, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” announced, “Henry C. Tryon, the scenic artist, is making constant additions to the Tivoli scenery. The gentleman has few superiors in his line” (page 3).
Immediately after this project, Tryon headed west to paint new scenery for the Salt Lake Theatre and Springville Theatre Hall in Utah. For the Salt Lake Theatre, Tryon painted one scene after another, used by touring troops and the Salt Lake Theatre Dramatic Combination company. His work was featured in “Old Shipmates,” “Not Guilty,” and “Under the Gaslight,” to name a few that fall. For “Under the Gaslight,” “The Salt Lake Herald” reported, “This piece has been thoroughly rehearsed, and the new scenes by Mr. Tryon will be used and assist materially in the effectiveness of the production. The piece will be well given and draw a good house.”
In a review of Tryon’s new ship scene used in “Old Shipmates” that fall, the “Deseret News” also discussed other scenic pieces painted by the popular artist. The article reported, “The new drapery and proscenium wings and borders painted by the same and talented artist, will be exhibited that evening for the first time” (October 24, 1883).
An article entitled “Theatre Improvements” in the “Deseret News” described his new proscenium wings and borders (18 Oct 1882, page 3):“Two heavy white marble columns placed on each side of the proscenium opening, surrounding and partly covered by rich crimson drapery, support a continuation of the same drapery, arched in Pompeian form, and with details carried out in a similar style. Immediately behind the arched opening formed the front drapery border, hangs a simple lambrequin of white satin, with a gold medallion fastened to the center of the principal festoon, in which is graven the beehive of Utah; surrounding the medallion are thistles on one side and roses on the other. The prevailing colors of the arch border are rich crimson and gold, the heaviest lightened up with black. The corners of the arches are weighted down by medallions of gold, varied by reliefs in white marble. The whole combination includes richness contrasted by extreme delicacy, and care has been taken that each, while harmonizing with the other, shall be separated by graceful continuous masses. Masking the top of the leading drapery hangs close to the proscenium another maroon ‘border’ with a medallion and drapery surrounding it, looped closely. The medallion in the centre is placed there as the response to those at the extreme ends of the drapery. This last border is hung in front of the drop curtain. The others about six feet back form the proscenium.”

*Detail of the stage right proscenium wing painted by Henry C. Tryon for the Salt Lake Theatre in 1883*

Each piece of Tryon’s stock scenery was gradually unveiled to the public from the fall of 1882 through the spring of 1883. Tryon initially painted a ship setting and a steamboat setting. His work was congratulated, and newspapers reported, “the new ship scene recently painted by Mr. Henry C. Tryon, of the Tabor Grand Opera House is acknowledged to be one of the most realistic sets ever put upon the stage” (Ogden Standard, 30 Sept, 1882, page 3). On Nov. 25, 1882, the “Salt Lake City Herald” reported that new scenes painted by Tryon included a snow scene, woods scene, street scene, and prison setting (page 8). By the end of May 1883, the “Deseret News” reported “The forest scene, painted by Henry C. Tryon, introduced last night and this afternoon in ‘The Serf,’ is a masterpiece. The foliage borders transform the stage into the appearance of a dense wood with actual timber, over hanging and spreading branches and leaves. It is the nearest approach to nature in the department of scene painting we have ever seen” (May 26, 1883, page 5).

Tryon’s stage trimmings, like those of many scenic artists, made news throughout the second half of the nineteenth century in America. The works of scenic artists were advertised, reviewed and applauded. Painted scenery by well-known artists drew crowds and added to the credibility of each performance. By the onset of the twentieth century, the listing of specific scenic artists in newspaper reviews began to diminish. The detailed descriptions of stage settings were gradually replaced with articles about other technological advancements in stage machinery and lighting. The presence of scenic artists, once celebrated in newspapers, began to fade; their identities hidden backstage at many venues.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 930 – Picture Sets, 1916

In 1916 Sosman & Landis delivered a picture setting to Indianapolis’ Strand Theatre. The studio took out an advertisement in the “Indianapolis Star” when the theater opened, announcing, “Designed, built and painted the elaborate picture setting for the new Strand Theatre listing their contribution. In 1916, studio president Thomas G. Moses recorded projects for picture sets in Fort Wayne, Indiana, and Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, too. The first picture set mentioned by Moses at all in his diaries was during 1915; a $1500 picture set for Fred Ingersoll in Detroit, Michigan. Here is the link for that post: https://drypigment.net2020/01/17/tales-from-a-scenic-artist-and-scholar-part-904-thomas-g-moses-and-frederick-ingersoll-1915/

The term “picture set,” or “picture setting,” had two meanings at the time. The first identified the painted scenery (leg drops and backdrop) that created a lovely setting with a center projection area. The backdrops in these picture sets were also termed “picture sheets.”

Picture setting design by the Twin City Scenic Co.

Picture setting design by the Twin City Scenic Co., see model picture below.

Another example of a picture set for a theater.

Of Fort Wayne project, Moses wrote, “Went to Fort Wayne to stage picture set at the Empress Theatre.” The $1300 project was for painted scenes that framed a projection screen placed within a painted composition. The new scenery was needed for the reopening of the venue as the Empress theater reopened as a combination house, featuring vaudeville acts and the latest three-reel films and serials..The Empress Theatre reopened under new management on June 16, 1916. The “Fort Wayne Sentinel” reported, “EIGHT BIG ACTS OF SUPREME VAUDEVILLE…This theatre, now under the management of large Eastern Circuit and will at all times give the public the best obtainable in from eight to ten acts of Vaudeville and High Class Musical Comedy.”

From the “Fort Wayne Sentinel,” June 14, 1916, page 5.

In 1916 “Picture set” also identified a setting for film production. Newspaper articles suggest that his was a relatively new practice in 1916. These new types of “picture sets” received a substantial amount of publicity. They were even referred to as a “new stunt” in filming (“Hobart Republican,” Hobart, Oklahoma, 17 Feb, 1916, page 7). The “Jackson Daily News” reported, “The use of a big theatre as a motion picture set is a new scheme and proved to be a very effective one” (8 Feb 1916, page). Here is the context…the Republic Theatre was used as a film set for a 1916 Florence Reed picture. Of the film, newspapers reported, “As soon as the curtain was rung down at 11 o’clock on ‘Common Clay,’ Producer Fitzmaurice with his star, Florence Reed and many extras, came in and took possession of the theatre. Special lights were installed and some twenty scenes taken in jig time….In order to carry out the realism the floor of the theatre was crowded with extras, and friends of various Pathe officials. Mr. Woods himself was present and gave many valuable hints as to detail. The picture is New York,” an adaptation of the one of Mr. Wild’s theatrical productions” (Jackson Daily News. 8 Feb 1916, page).

In 1916, Moses mentioned another movie picture set, writing, “In March we did a picture set for a suburban town near Pittsburg,” later adding, “We sent two of our picture set models to the Art Institute with the Palette and Chisel Club exhibit, and they received as much attention as some of the pictures.” These were movie set models that were on display for the exhibit instead of models that depicted a central projection screen.

Of the Palette & Chisel Club Exhibit, the “Chicago Tribune” reported, “New Exhibit at Institute. A unique event in the life of the Palette and Chisel Club in Chicago will take place on Tuesday evening, April 25, at the Art Institute. For twenty years the club has been holding its annual exhibitions at its own clubrooms. Tuesday night all precedent and tradition will be violated and its large and interesting collection of the last year’s activities along art lines will be shown at the Art Institute of Chicago. It is to be an extremely comprehensive exhibit, including in its scope not only paintings and sculpture, but the work of some master craftsman as well, men who apply their artistic talents to the usable things of life, incurring thereby the lasting gratitude of the practical masses.”

For the exhibit Gustave Bauman showed his wood block prints and book decorations, while Oswald Cooper, Fred Bersch and B. A. Kleboe exhibited various booklets and interesting examples of fine printing designed by them. John Carlsen showed special wall paper designs and Watkins Williams exhibited some stage designs. Williams was noted as a Sosman & Landis scenic artist. The newspaper article noted Williams as the artist who “designed and painted the scenery for the immortal Sarah Bernhardt on her last American tour.”

Williams worked at Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis models for movie sets would have been an asset to this diverse group, especially in light of Watkins.

One final picture set mentioned by Moses in 1916 was for the Studebaker Theatre in Chicago. Of it, he wrote, “Our big picture set at the Studebaker made a big hit, quiet and dignified.” This was likely another film set, as “quiet and dignified” seems an unusual way to describe a picture sheet.

This movie played at the Studebaker, another theater with a picture setting by Sosman 7 Landis. From the “Chicago Tribune,” 21 May 1916. page 29.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 856 – How to Enter Vaudeville by Frederic LaDelle, 1913

I stumbled across an interesting publication while looking for information about Jackson, Michigan. “How to Enter Vaudeville” was published by the Frederic LaDelle the same year that Sosman & Landis delivered scenery to the town. The content of the book is interesting and cover a lot of ground, providing an interesting snap shot of the production process in 1913. Below is the list of what was contained in LaDelle’s publication:

“CONTAINING – – The Keynote of Success Now to Start in Vaudeville, How to make a success. How to secure an original act. What kind of act to get up. Rehearsals. How to report for rehearsals. How to rehearse. Breaking in your act. Cues. Properties. How to finish your act. How to dress your act. Where to work on the stage. Scenery. Billing and property lines. How to get some publicity. Vocal and instrumental music, free. Conduct off the stage. A dictionary of stage terms, fixtures and appurtenances, Vaudeville slang and phrases. Characterization and impersonation. The orchestra. Headliners. How to overcome stage fright. Encores. How to get a reputation quickly. Distinctiveness and originality. How to enter the dramatic profession. Ordinary acts and big reputations. Theatrical publications. Circuits, Contracts, House rules. Booking agencies. Writing to booking agencies. Booking agents partial to beginners. Salaries. Seeing booking agents personally. Writing for engagements. Professional letterheads. Stage conduct. After receiving contracts. Presenting yourself to the stage manager. Handling your baggage. Behavior toward stage managers. Closing an engagement. Booking your act through Europe and the continent. Firms dealing in theatrical goods. Securing press notices. Advertising your act. How acts are reported. Questions and answers. Ninety vaudeville acts explained. How to interest your audience. Eccentric wardrobe and makeup. Eliminating crudity and amateurishness. Process of making up illustrated. Making up for various races, nationalities and characters.”

However, it was the inclusion of “a dictionary of stage terms, fixtures and appurtenances” that really caught my eye. We often look for technical terms in technical manuals. We forget to consider other sources, such as “How to Enter Vaudeville.” Although written for the performer, it provides a wealth of information about theatre technology. Stage terms vary from country to country, region to region, and sometimes decade to decade. LaDelle’s publication provides insight into theatre terminology specific to Jackson, Michigan, in 1913.

In LaDelle’s dictionary section (page 48), I want to point out the following definitions as it forms some technical context for this period as I continue to write about the life and times of Thomas G. Moses:

Box set. A set of flats representing a scene, where each piece is lashed to the other forming a square box.

Battens. Wooden strips attached to drop.

Border lights. Those lights suspended above the stage.

Bunch lights. A cluster of lights in a reflector attached to a movable iron stand.

Cyclorama drop. A suspended drop that encircles the stage from back up to tormentor wings

Drop. A painted scene suspended by ropes through pulleys in gridiron.

Dimmer. A dimmer is an electrical device for gradually brightening or lowering the lights of the theatre. It is used for production effects as sunrise, twilight, etc. The larger theatres have their own dimmers, but where the act calls for this effect they should be included in the property of the performer.

Flats. Pieces of scenery that are made rigid by frames and are placed and replaced by hand.

Fancy borders. Strips of painted scenery suspended across the stage to match different scenes.

Footlights. Row of lights sunk just below the floor level at the front of the stage.

Grand teaser. A fancy border suspended behind the asbestos curtain and in front of the house curtain.

Grips. Those stage hands that place and replace flats on stage by hand.

House curtain. This curtain is the first back of the asbestos curtain and is generally painted with some attractive scene, such as a landscape or some similar view. A good many houses also paint advertisements of local merchants on the house curtain.

Leg drop. A suspended scene with an opening cut out of it, forming a leg on each side.

Olio or street drop. A suspended scene representing a street dropped directly behind tormentor wings. [Note that this defines the olio as a scene and not machine].

Stage braces. Strips of heavy wood, with hook in one end and eye in the other. They are hooked into the eye in the flats and the other end screwed down to the stage to brace the piece of scenery.

Sky borders. Strips of blue cloth suspended by lines across the stage to represent the sky.

Scrim drop. A suspended scene with an opening in it backed with transparent gauze. [does this not sound like what we call a cut drop?]

Spot lights. A circle of intense white light thrown from the balcony or gallery, upon the performer while on the stage. Flood lights are produced by enlarging the circle of light so as to light the entire stage with strong light from the front of the house.

Strip Lights. A strip of lights at either side of the stage opening.

Tormentors. Fancy draped and painted wings, one on each side of stage, fixed permanently.

Tormentor border. The strip of painted drapery suspended above and just behind tormentors.

Working in one, two, etc. The stage is divided on each side by imaginary spaces or entrances which are between each wing; for instance, working in one, means that an act is using that space on stage from street scene to footlights; being the space from the footlights to an imaginary line from one tormentor wing to another. Working in two, means using the space in front of the second wing which is generally set four feet back of the tormentor wings. The same idea holds for working in three, four, full stage, etc.

For more definitions and a scan of the entire publication, here is the link from the Library of Congress page on Bob Hope and American Vaudeville:

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=bobhope&fileName=hope41Apage.db&recNum=0

Sample letterhead in Frederic LaDelle’s 1913 publication

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 809 – The Moonlight Olio

Today’s post continues with the story of New York Studios for one more post. In 1912, the firm brought suit against the owners of the Colonial Theatre. In court they tried to recovered money that was due from F. & H. Schweppe for a “Moonlight Olio.”

A moonlight effect drop at the Scottish Rite in Deadwood, South Dakota.

Backside of drop for the moonlight effect.

I have read many tales of honest and hard-working people who were not paid for their work. They all seem to share a similar story. Only twice, have I had the misfortune of being “stiffed;” pretty good for being in the business more than thirty years. However, for me that was twice too many. I think that the first time was the hardest as I didn’t see it coming. It concerned painted ceremonial settings for the Ancient & Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine – go figure.

While researching the life and times of Thomas G. Moses, I have repeatedly read the letters of correspondence between scenic studios and various Masonic organizations, begging for money owed from scenery that was already designed or installed. In many ways, I feel quite fortunate with only suffering from two dishonest clients.

Not being paid from a Masonic organization is similar to not being paid from a religious institution; they know better. I always think back to Thomas G. Moses quote, “My experience with Church Committees, of all denominations was such that I almost promised myself never to enter another Church. I found a lot of dishonest men that were pillars of the church and naturally I looked upon them as good Christians, and their word should have been as good as their bond.”

There is an interesting dance that often occurs with a client, or organization, owes money for completed work and has no intention of paying. After a series of delays, a lame excuse is often presented as justifying nonpayment. It really doesn’t matter to the client at this point, as the vendor has already delivered everything promised; they are simply waiting for compensation. So the client just sits, gambling in a way, and hoping that no legal action will ensue. The person owed the money contemplates whether the amount is large enough to incur additional legal fees. In 1912, New York Studios decided the amount was worth it. Their particular story had to do with a client paying for scenery that was not returned in 1911.

On March 18, 1912, the “Star-Gazette” reported “The New York Studio, painters of stage scenery of all sorts has begun action against Schweppe Brothers, owners of the Colonial Theatre on Main Street to recover $90, claimed to be due on a “moonlight olio drop” which was furnished that theater. It is alleged that settlement made with Schweppes at a certain figure providing the local firm would return the drop. The studio says the drop has not been returned” (Elmira, New York, page 3). In other words they rented a drop and decided to keep it. The first time round they lost the case in city court.

On September 4, 1912, the “Star-Gazette” reported “The New York Studios Company, through their attorneys, Baldwin & Allison, have appealed from a jury’s verdict in city court which was rendered in favor of Fred and Henry Schweppe, owners of the Colonial Theatre block. The action has been tried in a city court to recover $90, which the New York Studios Company alleged was due them for a ‘Moonlight Olio.’ The jury held that the Schweppe Brothers were justified in their position. The jury rendered that verdict on July 25” (Elmira, New York, page 11).

Now there is the basic question here: “What is a Moonlight Olio?” There is an ongoing discussion about “olio, the machine” versus “olio, the scene.” In this particular case it is painted scenery, more specifically a backdrop that depicts a moonlight scene or has a moonlight effect. Olio likely refers to the studio design label. Examples of “olio” drop compositions can be found in the Performing Arts archives at the University of Minnesota. The Twin City Scenic Co. collection has an entire box of olio designs, with each label using an “O” for olio, for example, O-89. Olio drops were musical numbers placed between the scenes of a play/melodrama and were independent of the main storyline. Back to the court case…

By 1915, The “Star-Gazette” published the ongoing 4-year saga of the moonlight olio, reporting, “The action grows out of the furnishing scenery for the Colonial. The original claims were settled at 75 cents on the dollar and in the settlement the Messrs. Schweppe were to return a moonlight drop, which is one of the canvas painted drops which make the background of the stage setting. The studios had furnished two olios and it is claimed that the wrong one was returned. From this incident, four years ago, grows the present action for $90. It was tried once in City Court and Messrs. Schweppe were successful. The studios appealed” (1 June 1915, page 7). On June 2, 1915, the verdict was published – $90 was awarded to the New York Studios. The “Star-Gazette” commented, “The $90 is the full amount of the claim but it is not so much the money as a vindication of lawyers that was being fought for” (1, June 1915, page 7).

The $90 fee for the Moonlight Olio is the equivalent of $2,380.44 today. Although this was not a great amount of money for a scenic studio to lose in product, they had to fight this battle in a very visible arena. Their legal actions sent a signal to other theaters and clients that New York Studios would not back down; they would collect money owed, regardless of the amount.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. The Howell Opera House and the Donaldson Guide, 1894

In 1894, the “Donaldson Guide” listed that the Howell Opera house had a seating capacity of 750. This number was 100 seats less than those included in earlier directories, such as Harry Miner’s or Jno. B. Jeffery’s theatrical guides. It may simply suggest the purchase of new seats, or a clerical error, but the number varies from earlier seating capacities. The Donaldson Guide also listed that the theater was now under management of W. E. Beach, with ticket prices being 25, 35, and 50 cents. No rental information was provided.

The “Donaldson Guide” was published by W. H. Donaldson (1864-1925) in Cincinnati, Ohio. It is certainly a publication worth perusing.

Col. William H. Donaldson was born in Dayton, Kentucky, the son of William M. Donaldson. After High School, Donaldson worked for his father who ran an art store and picture-framing establishment in Cincinnati. His father then established a poster business at 127 West Eighth Street, Cincinnati, which later became Donaldson Lithographing Company. Donaldson worked for his father as a salesman and “proved to be remarkably capable, winning and acknowledged place as the best poster salesman in the country” The Cincinnati Enquirer, 2 Aug. 1925, page 5). Donaldson rose to nationwide prominence as a circus and theatrical publisher.

Advertisement in the Donaldson Guide, 1894

In 1894, Donaldson founded and published two new publications – “The Donaldson Guide” and “The Billboard.” That same year, he was appointed Secretary of the Protective League of American Showman (The Cincinnati Enquirer, 31 Dec. 1894, page 8). The first issue of the Billboard was published during November at 127 East Eighth Street, Cincinnati, containing only eight pages, with its contents being devoted solely and entirely to billposting, poster-printing and advertising agency interests. In 1899, the Donaldson plant moved to Newport, Kentucky. Donaldson remained with the business until 1904 when he resigned to devote his entire time the Billboard. He was the president of the Billboard Publishing Company.

The Donaldson Guide was published “for the use of showmen, theatrical managers, circus managers, managers of opera-houses, dramatic, musical, and variety agents, bill posters, show printers, costumers, and all Persons identified or connected with the show business in an manner whatever.”

The publication was advertised as, “containing a list of all opera-houses in the United States and Canada with description of their stages, their seating capacity, and the names of the managers of each; the populations of cities, and the names and population of adjacent towns to draw from; the names of city bill-posters, baggage express men, hotels, boarding-houses, newspapers, vaudeville resorts, museum, beer gardens, fairs, race meetings, circus licenses, and miscellaneous facts, dates, etc., of great value to managers.” Donaldson Guide also noted that it was published “in conjunction with the Showman’s Encyclopedia, “the International Professional Register,” and “the complete code of the Donaldson cipher.”

The “Showman’s Encyclopedia” portion of the “Donaldson Guide” was noted as “A compilation of information for showmen, performers, agents, and everyone identified with the theatrical, vaudeville, or circus business, such as ticket tables, internet tables, the address of show-painters, costumes, dramatic agents, theatrical architects, scenic artists, aeronauts, playwrights, etc…” and “the International Professional Register, a directory of the names and address of dramatic people, variety people, minstrel people, circus people, freaks, acrobats, operatic artists, musicians, and farce-comedy artists.

The “Donaldson Guide” also included a cipher and key that are quite intriguing. Here is what was offered at the time for telegrams:

TO CONSTRUCT a message use the Key to the Cipher. The phrases will be found arranged under convenient headings, with directions under each for finding readily any needed clause.

TO DECIPHER a message use the Index to the Cipher. The cipher words are all arranged alphabetically, and can be found as quickly as in a dictionary.

TELEGRAPH IN CIPHER TO the manager of any Opera House, Theatre, Museum, Music-Hall, or Vaudeville Resort; any Show-Printer, Costumer, Dramatic, Variety, or Vaudeville Agent, or “The Clipper,” “Mirror,” “Dramatic News,” “Dramatic Weekly, “Dramatic Journal,” “dramatic Star,” “Music and Drama,” or any theatrical paper whatever in the United States or Canada, whose name appears in the Guide or Encyclopædia. A copy of the index of the Donaldson Cipher has been sent to each and every one of then free of charge. Remember, if the names of any person engaged in any of the callings appear in either the GUIDE or ENCYCLOPÆDIA, you may telegraph to them in cipher with perfect impunity.

THE ADVANTAGES of the Cipher are many and varied. Foremost among them, of course, is the great savings which may be had in the matter of telegraph charges. A glance at the following pages can not fail to demonstrate the truth of this assertion to the entire satisfaction of even the most skeptical, for there are few messages indeed which can not be kept within the limit of ten words prescribed by telegraph companies. But economy is not the only advantage it has to recommend it. The mere fact that the message is unintelligible to anyone except the party for whom it is intended is often times a source of wonderful satisfaction, both to the sender and recipient; and this, added to the fact that experience has proven that there is less danger of errors, confusion, and mistakes in cipher message than those couched in ordinary language, renders it a most desirable medium of communication.”

The key to the “Donaldson Guide” cipher included phrases pertaining to actors, actresses, addresses, advertisements, aeronauts, agencies, agency business, agents, answers, attractions, billing, bill-boards, booking, burlesque people, business manager, calcium lights, calls, canvas-maker, circus manager, circus people, C.O.D. shipments, collections, concert, couriers, dates (printing house, calendar), deposits, dodgers, dramatic people-men, dramatic people-women, drunkenness, duns, engagements-artist to manager, engagements-manager to artist, expenses, financial straits, free list, hangers, heralds, hippodrome, house show, instructions-manager to agent, leaders, letter-style of, lithograph boards, lithographers, lithographs, local manager, mail, managers of combinations, managers of opera houses, managing editor, measurements, medicine show, minstrel people, money, musicians, no (street numbers, catalogue numbers, etc.), numerals (for quantities, amounts, etc., but not money), operatic people, opposition, orders, paper, partner, percentages, posters, printer, printing, programmes, property man, prospects, qualifications of people, receipts, remittances, repertoire people, reports, routes, salary, samples, sharing, shipping instructions, shows, side-show or museum, sizes, spaces, special delivery, specialties, stage carpenter, stands, streamers, terms, time of day, traveling managers, two weeks’ notice, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Variety People, weather, and window work-lithographers.

The fact that any cipher was created to relay information about drunkenness says a lot. Here are a few examples for your amusement.

Unacted….I (we) understand my (or our) agent is drinking

Unactive…If this is the case wire me at once

Unapt….Let me know if he is in condition to transact business

Unarm….I understand that you are drinking

Unasked….Sober up at once

Unawed….And get down to business in dead earnest

Unbar….Or I shall discharge you forthwith

Unbed….I have no sympathy or patience with a drunkard

Unbend….Do not let him have any money

Unbit….Try and sober up

Charter….Any information you may see fit to let me (or us) have will be gratefully received and treated strictly confidential.

Hopefully the person operating the telegraph or delivering the telegram did not moonlight at the theatre. I wonder how often someone received:

Unarm. Unasked. Unawed. Unbar.

Donaldson passed away in 1925. That year, the “Cincinnati Enquirer” reported “Mr. Donaldson was a member of the Masonic Order and Odd Fellows, to which he devoted much attention” (2 Aug. 1925, page 5). Another article reported, “Colonel Donaldson founded the Billboard and published it until two years. Ago. He was interested in prison reform, employed many former convicts upon release from prison, and declared that he was never defrauded by any of them” (Cincinnati Inquirer, 4 Aug. 1925, page 2). He was survived by his widow Jennie (Hassan) and daughter Marjorie (Mrs. Roger S. Littleford), his father William H. and three brothers (Andrew, Lincoln and Archibald) and two sisters (Mrs. Charles Longley and Mrs. Dr. George W. Brown). Donaldson’s death in Sarasota Florida at the relatively young age of 61 came as a shock to his family. Having been in failing health for some time, he came to Sarasota at the suggestion of his friends, Charles and John Ringling (The Jacksonville Daily Journal, 2 Aug. 1925, page 3).

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 752 – Gallagher and Shean’s Olio “Battle of Bay Run,” 1910

In 1910, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “We did an odd set for Gallagher in vaudeville – three drops set to represent a battleship from any angle of the theatre, very effective.”

Sosman & Landis created a naval-themed olio setting for Gallagher and Shean, the vaudeville comedy team. Their olio sketch was written by Edward Gallagher and called “Battle of Bay Run” (Philadelphia Inquirer, 30 Aug. 1910, page 5). The use of the term “olio” is referring to a musical number, one that is independent from the featured performance.

The vaudeville comedy team, Gallagher and Shean

In 1910, Gallagher and Shean partnered to present “Big Banner Show,” and toured across the country (The Buffalo Enquirer, 27 Dec. 1910, page 10).

Advertisement from the “Daily Record,” (Long Branch NJ), 13 Aug 1910, page 3

Advertisement from the “Kansas City Globe,” 11 Nov 1910, page 7

The program was composed of a two-act musical comedy, “The Girl from Paris,” olios, and several high-end vaudeville acts. Gallagher’s olio “The Battle of Bay Run” featured a naval travesty, in used the setting created by Sosman & Landis (St. Louis Star and times, 31 Oct. 1910, page 3). Another olio for the show featured Shean as “The Dandy Little Dutchman.” Of the vaudeville acts, the Potter-Hartwell Trio, an acrobatic team, in “The Man with Two Heads,” Annette Goldie singing Southern songs, and a “Hokey-Pokey” girl chorus. (The Evening Sun, Baltimore, Maryland, 3 Sept. 1910, page 7).

“The Baltimore Sun” commented on the production, “[It] is really a clever concoction, more of a musical comedy than a burlesque. At times it is very pretentious, both in musical numbers and scenery. Mr. Gallagher, as an American in Paris, is ‘roped in’ by one of those French maidens who conveniently faints, is clever in his manner of handling the comedy and the plot, and has a good voice. Mr. Shean’s droll German dialect is not introduced until the closing number, as the proprietor of a hotel in Switzerland. The girls are some numbers above the average and sing and dance well. With ‘Money,’ a novelty march song, and ‘Three Jolly Scotchmen,’ in which they are seen in the regulation Scotch attire, decided hits are made. Edna Davenport, as the girl from Paris, carried the house with her ‘Espanola Prance.’ The best olio feature was Gallagher and Shean’s naval travesty” (6 Sept, 1910, page 9).

Edward Gallagher partnered with Al Shean early in his career. Shean’s birth name was Abraham Elieser Adolph Schönberg. He was born in Dornum, Germany, the son of ventriloquist Levy Schönberg, and yodeling harpist Fanny Salomons. The couple immigrated to New York City in approximately 1880 with Shean and his sister Miene. Miene, nicknamed “Minnie,” married Samuel “Frenchie” Marx in 1884; they were the parents of the later well-known Marx Brothers.

Moses would also work with the Marx Brothers on a project in 1926, although he was not impressed with the famous performers at all. Of them, Moses wrote, “Made several sketches for Marks Brothers. I have no faith in them. I think them very cheap.”

Gallagher and Shean partnered in 1910, the same year that Moses was hired to create the battleship scene. Each had begun their career as a small-time performer in burlesque and variety shows. Shean initially made a reputation for himself performing in “Quo Vadis Upside Down.”

Gallagher and Shean were later featured in the “Ziegfeld Follies” and other reviews, associated with the popular patter song “Mister Gallagher and Mister Shean.” That song included the lyrics: “Absolutely Mr. Gallagher? Positively Mr. Shean!” and was recorded after their 1922 Ziegfeld Follies performance. The lyrics were credited to Brian Foy with music by Shean.

Sheet music for the song “Mister Gallagher and Mister Shean.”

Sheet music for “Mister Gallagher and Mister Shean.”

Here is a 1922 recording of their song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bBvYO5FigI

From 1914-1920, the duo briefly parted, but reunited after the urging of Minnie Marx. Their reunion would not last long, however, with the partnership ending in 1925. The dissolution of their partnership was one in a series of challenges that Gallagher faced during the 1920s. Other obstacles included a prolonged dispute with Foy over song writes to “Mister Gallagher and Mister Shean,” difficulties with the Schubert Brothers, and a divorce from his third wife. Gallagher finally suffered a nervous breakdown and later died in a sanatorium in 1929.

Shean, on the other hand, went onto enjoy a successful career on both the stage and screen, appearing in 25 Hollywood films from 1934 to 1943. He would continue performing the patter song, partnering with Charles Einninger for the 1941 Ziegfeld Follies. Here is their performance in front of an Egyptian setting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkzAEGarl9Q).

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 710 – Scenic Art Training

Part 710: Scenic Art Training

Over a year ago, I was contacted by a fellow scenic artist in the UK. She was searching for information about instructional guides that described the painting process in the 19^th century. It is fun to converse with and assist a fellow scenic artist who is also focusing on the history of scenic art. While keeping an eye open over the past year, I stumbled across “The Art and Mystery of Scene Painting” in “Britain at Work. A Pictorial Description of Our National Industries,” published in 1902. One particular sentence that caught my eye as I started to read the article: “In these pages, however, it is with scene- painting as an avocation rather than as an art that we are primarily concerned.” This is a loaded statement that signified a shift in the scenic art profession, and one that should be considered today.

Before I post this article in its entirety (over the course of the next few days due to length) there is something to consider about our theatrical past, our future and the training of scenic artists. I say this from the perspective of one who has been criticized for not sharing enough about my personal scenic art and restoration techniques.

I’ll start with the historical context of sharing scenic art techniques with fellow scenic artists, or the general public. During the 19^th century, the mystery of scenic art was unveiled in multiple publications. This continued into the twentieth century, although the process somewhat shifted to stress a simple avocation. During this time, the roll of the scenic artist as “genius,” “visionary,” and “master artist” starts to disappear. The scenic artist becomes the mere translator of a scenic designer’s vision. For stage scenery, another concept enters the public perception of scenic art, and that is the idea that “anyone can paint.”

All the while, numerous instructional pamphlets and publications began to appear, most accentuating that scene painting is more of an avocation than an art form, and it can easily be studied and mastered. These publications promote that a book can adequately instruct any student, or interested individual, to paint theatre scenery. Even the title of the 1902 article attempts to convey the “mystery” of the scenic art avocation. This was part of a growing trend where 19^th century scenic art techniques and stage effects are shared with the general pubic for enjoyment and reference. Innovative and intriguing mechanical effects even appeared in “Scientific American” as popular topics. In some ways, this was the equivalent of a magician revealing its secret to the crowd, as inquiring minds wanted to know. Another fascinating publication was “Magic Stage Illusions and Scientific Diversions Including Trick Photography,” compiled and edited by Albert A. Hopkins in 1897. This is all part of a growing trend that intensified by the early twentieth century.

Meanwhile, between approximately 1850 and 1950, the perception of the art aspect to scenic art, becomes promoted as a craft. The scenic studios systematically cranking out scenery greatly contributed to this perception. The painting techniques and overall stage aesthetic of painted illusion also began to shift at this time. It is pretty easy to identify when examining backdrops over the course of several decades when they were painted; an artistry began to gradually fade, and is replaced with a more systematic and formulaic approach that has continued to this day. This does not mean that the skill wasn’t present in artists, but the paint application and actual training started to follow a different course. There is also the interesting introduction of the perception that a scenic artist’s job could be successfully completed by any well-intentioned and slightly skilled individual. In other words, with just a little time and some guidance, they could successfully paint stage scenery. In a similar vein, think about the manufacture of cars; a lot of companies make cars, but they are not all equal, ranging from $12,000 to $750,000. The all have four tires and a steering wheel, but there is a difference in quality, even when the basic function is the same.

Then we consider the actual training of scenic artists, as it began to shift from studio to school. I remain on the fence about scenic art being taught at a University versus in a paint studio. I am of a generation who received scenic art instruction at University and benefited from a liberal arts approach. Exploring scenic art techniques was placed within the wonderful context of supplemental knowledge discovered in humanities and art history classes. But I did not learn scenic art in a studio, where I lived and breathed it six days a week for six decades.

The entire American stage aesthetic also shifted during this same period, 1900-1930. This era included an increased appearance of draperies for settings instead of strict painted illusion. The decorative nature of popular art began to permeate the stage and the rise of scenic designer increased, delegating the scenic artist to become a translator for their vision. The dominance of the Düsseldorf and Hudson River Valley schools’ romanticism was somewhat replaced with stencils and paint-by-number on a variety of fabrics, including silks and plush velvet. However, for standard high school, community, ethnic hall or other productions, instructional manuals helped and encouraged amateur artists paint the necessary stage scenes. We can be thrilled that art permeated all aspects of our culture, but it also redefined the field scenic art.

Only so much scenic art instruction can be passed along in a book or online, even with a lovely YouTube video. This is a profession that requires hands-on instruction and mentorship, as well as intensive study and years of practice. In the end, not all scenic artists are equal. Now, this is my belief, and I have certainly been read the riot act about this stance, yet I cannot think of any profession where all individuals are equal, just look at the medical profession. If all scenic artists were the same, we would all charge the same rate and everything would look the same; there would be no need for unions or people receiving any higher rate than another..

While working with Vern Sutton at Opera in the Ozarks one summer, I heard him say something pretty profound to a group of young opera singers; his message could really apply to all artists. He was explaining how very few world class singers were out there. Unless he had specifically told an individual that they were world class, they weren’t; “you will recognize a world class voice instantly.” That same summer, I heard my first world-class voice and it was unmistakable, no question; there was only the one in the dozens of performers that year. The same can be said for scenic art. There are some who rise to top of their profession, whether as a rocket or bubble of air seeking the surface. Many scenic artists spend an increadible amount of money and time perfecting their techniques and knowledge of the industry.

Understandably, these journeymen scenic artists are hesitant to give their “secrets” all away, unless they are in a secure position. This is not a new stance, as I have repeatedly encountered this topic in scenic artists’ memoirs and newspaper articles throughout the nineteenth and twentieth century. Think of the entire point of guilds protecting trade secrets. I think of the newspapers that heralded a handful of scenic artists when there were hundreds painting during the 1890s. These were exceptionally skilled individuals. Only a few rose to the top of their profession, and they did not give free or reduced-rate workshops for aspiring artists. They may have painted alongside apprentices in fine art studios, or at the paint frame, but there was a hierarchy in the industry based on skill and experience.

When you have a formula, or trade secret that works really well for you – one that took years to understand or develop – would you share it with a direct competitor? Would you share a formula, or trade secret, with a fellow scenic artist in another region or country that did not directly compete with you? Would you share your research with the world before publishing? Knowing the time and expense that you invested in training and experience, would you share a recipe or technique with someone who is just starting out? I was once told, if you give something away, it can devalue what you are actually offering. In context, please consider, that I have likely done more pro bono work over the course of my career than actual paid work. I frequently give away much of my research and what I know, but I am not putting a restoration or painting recipe on a card, as it devalues what I have to offer as a professional and what I have worked so hard to accomplish.

Here is another consideration: If you are a teacher with health insurance, benefits and a retirement plan, it is part of your job to share your recipes and train your students. If you are a freelance artist and have struggled to do it all on your own, is it not your job to share and train. If you have a secure and full-time position in a paint studio, this is very different than an itinerant artist who never knows where their next project will take them. Skilled students directly benefit, and reflect positively on a university instructor or full-time charge artist in a shop; they are a direct credit to their mentor’s skill and leadership. This is not the case for the experienced freelance artist or any independent contractor. I can think of no other profession that expects professionals to share all of their knowledge with someone who is just starting out, unless they are grooming them to be a replacement at the end of a career. Enough of the diatribe, I welcome feedback and criticism of my thoughts.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 635 -The Era of Brown’s Special System and the Role of Stage Carpenter

Part 635: The Era of Brown’s Special System and the Role of Stage Carpenter

The “Star Tribune” article “Experts Behind the Scenes” (Minneapolis, January 13, 1901) noted that the “ruler of this realm behind the footlights” was titled “stage carpenter.” Titles have changed over the decades, as they are fluid and defined by a specific time or place. Titles may designate specific roles in the larger makeup of the theatrical trades, differing a century later. Today, some may identify the title “stage carpenter” as a “builder” and a “scenic artist” as a “painter.” There was a time when these two distinctive titles designated “stage visionaries” who brilliantly engineered and lit a variety of scenic effects and staged illusions, thrilling nineteenth-century audiences. During the late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth century, it was not uncommon for a stage carpenter to paint scenery or a scenic artist to engineer mechanical effects. Furthermore, many scenic artists controlled the lights on their painted scenes, visually guiding the intended stage aesthetic from conception to performance. It was a time of great possibility in America, when we were neither limited to a single trade nor skill.

Behind the stage scene at a theater, published in “Frank Leslie’s Popular Monthly,” 1893 Vol 36, Nov. No 5

By 1907, there was an article that defined the stage carpenter, using John Bairstow (also printed as Barstow) as an example. John, and later his son William H., were two of the Chicago Auditorium’s stage carpenters. While researching stage carpenters during the spring of 2017, I discovered a wonderful article about their work and the contribution of John Bairstow and the design of the Auditorium stage.

On September 28, 1907, the “Oregon Daily Journal” included an article written by Jonas Howard in their Sunday Supplement about stage carpenters. It provides a historical context for the title of “stage carpenter,” as it was perceived during the first decade of the twentieth century. This was printed at the same time that Sosman & Landis were delivering Brown’s Special System to Scottish Rite theaters across the country. Here is a section from the article:

“The only jack of all trades who has mastered them all is the stage carpenter. What the stage carpenter doesn’t know or can’t find out could be written in a small book. He must be not only a carpenter of the first rank, but a plumber, machinist, painter, blacksmith, sailor, tailor, artist and common laborer as well. In fact, the stage carpenter must be an all around genius or he wouldn’t hold his job five minutes.” [We’ll pause right here to look at two things. The first is that they distinguish between a painter and artist. The second circles back to the 1901 “Star Tribune” article that describes how the stage carpenter ruled the “realm behind the footlights.” No kidding, because if you are capable of doing it all, you understand the process and details that could prevent and foresee a catastrophe]

Howard’s 1907 article continues, “Stage carpenters begin their careers as assistants to the property men or scene painters. During the first year of their apprenticeship they do nothing but the rougher jobs around the stage, such as moving scenery, repairing frames and helping the electrician. Later they are allowed to work some of the ropes that are used to manipulate the scenery and gradually work into the positions as fly men. It is not until a stage carpenter can make and repair “trick” stuff that he is called proficient in his business, and as “trick” stuff is as intricate and varied as the tricks themselves it is only the keen witted carpenters that reach the front of their profession.

‘Trick’ stuff is that part of the stage machinery that is used to bring about various spectacular scenic effects that are so common on the present day stage. Sometimes there is an automobile race to be brought off, and it is up to the stage carpenter to devise a scheme that will make an automobile run a mile or more at top speed in the space of 20 or 30 feet. To do this there must be a set of rollers under the floor to turn the automobile’s wheels. The country through which the race is run must be painted on canvas and wound up on upright rollers so it can whizz by at the rate of 90 miles an hour or so. All of this arrangement must be put together with skill or it would not endure through the performance. Stage tricks are so numerous that there could be no accounting of them. Nearly every show has some mechanical device to produce its stage effects and the stage carpenter must be enough of a mechanic to be familiar with all of them.

In the Auditorium theatre in Chicago which has one of the largest stages in the world, there is 2,000,000 feet of rope and cables. To handle these and keep them in repair requires the services of a man who knows as much about ropes as a sailor. In the producing houses more stage carpenters are employed that are used in the theatres where the stage productions are shown after they are once set up. When a play is produced all of its scenery must be made and painted and the work is under the supervision of the stage carpenter. Each piece of scenery must be made so that it can be used in the average theatre throughout the country, for it would not do to make the scenery to fit any one house. John Barstow, former stage carpenter at the Auditorium, the stage of which he built, has been in the business nearly fifty years. He began his career in Europe, coming to this side shortly after the civil war. Before the Auditorium was built Mr. Barstow was sent to Europe to learn all he could about the stage arrangements of the best theaters and on his return he incorporated all of the best features of these houses in the Auditorium stage. His son, William H. Barstow, is the present stage carpenter at the Auditorium.”

Of all the stage carpenter’s in the world, the author uses Bairstow and the Chicago Auditorium as an example. I’ll look start with the venue tomorrow.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 615 – Theatrical Guides – W. H. Donaldson and His Cipher for Drunkeness

Part 616: Theatrical Guides – W. H. Donaldson and His Cipher for Drunkenness

“The Donaldson Guide” was published by W. H. Donaldson (1864-1925) in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Col. William H. Donaldson was born in Dayton, Kentucky, the son of William M. Donaldson. After High School, Donaldson worked for his father who ran an art store and picture framing establishment in Cincinnati. His father then established a poster business at 127 West Eighth street, Cincinnati, which later became Donaldson Lithographing Company. Donaldson worked for his father as a salesman and “proved to be remarkably capable, winning and acknowledged place as the best poster salesman in the country” The Cincinnati Enquirer, 2 Aug. 1925, page 5). Donaldson rose to nationwide prominence as a circus and theatrical publisher.

The Donaldson Lithographing Company of Cincinnati, Ohio

In 1894, Donaldson founded and published two new publications – “The Donaldson Guide” and “The Billboard.” That same year, he was appointed Secretary of the Protective League of American Showman (The Cincinnati Enquirer, 31 Dec. 1894, page 8). The first issue of the Billboard was published during November at 127 East Eighth Street, Cincinnati, containing only eight pages, with its contents being devoted solely and entirely to bill-posting, poster-printing and advertising agency interests. In 1899, the Donaldson plant moved to Newport, Kentucky. Donaldson remained with the business until 1904 when he resigned to devote his entire time the Billboard. He was the president of the Billboard Publishing Company.

The Donaldson Guide included a Showman’s Encyclopædia in 1894

The Showman’s Encyclopedia was noted as “A compilation of information for showmen, performers, agents, and everyone identified with the theatrical, vaudeville, or circus business, such as ticket tables, internet tables, the address of show-painters, costumes, dramatic agents, theatrical architects, scenic artists, aeronauts, playwrights, etc…” and “the International Professional Register, a directory of the names and address of dramatic people, variety people, minstrel people, circus people, freaks, acrobats, operatic artists, musicians, and farce-comedy artists.

The Donaldson Guide also included a Cipher Key and Index to be used to telegraph information and messages. This cipher is from 1894

The Donaldson cipher and key are absolutely intriguing. Here is what was offered:

TO CONSTRUCT a message use the Key to the Cipher. The phrases will be found arranged under convenient headings, with directions under each for finding readily any needed clause.

TO DECIPHER a message use the Index to the Cipher. The cipher words are all arranged alphabetically, and can be found as quickly as in a dictionary.

The key to the Donaldson cipher included phrases pertaining to actors, actresses, addresses, advertisements, aeronauts, agencies, agency business, agents, answers, attractions, billing, bill-boards, booking, burlesque people, business manager, calcium lights, calls, canvas-maker, circus manager, circus people, C.O.D. shipments, collections, concert, couriers, dates (printing house, calendar), deposits, dodgers, dramatic people-men, dramatic people-women, drunkenness, duns, engagements-artist to manager, engagements-manager to artist, expenses, financial straits, free list, hangers, heralds, hippodrome, house show, instructions-manager to agent, leaders, letter-style of, lithograph boards, lithographers, lithographs, local manager, mail, managers of combinations, managers of opera houses, managing editor, measurements, medicine show, minstrel people, money, musicians, no (street numbers, catalogue numbers, etc.), numerals (for quantities, amounts, etc., but not money), operatic people, opposition, orders, paper, partner, percentages, posters, printer, printing, programmes, property man, prospects, qualifications of people, receipts, remittances, repertoire people, reports, routes, salary, samples, sharing, shipping instructions, shows, side-show or museum, sizes, spaces, special delivery, specialties, stage carpenter, stands, streamers, terms, time of day, traveling managers, two weeks’ notice, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Variety People, weather, and window work-lithographers.

The phrases to convey messages pertaining to drunkenness published in the Donaldson Guide, 1894

The fact that any cipher was created to relay information about drunkenness says a lot. Here are a few examples for your amusement.

Unacted….I (we) understand my (or our) agent is drinking

Unactive…If this is the case wire me at once

Unapt….Let me know if he is in condition to transact business

Unarm….I understand that you are drinking

Unasked….Sober up at once

Unawed….And get down to business in dead earnest

Unbar….Or I shall discharge you forthwith

Unbed….I have no sympathy or patience with a drunkard

Unbend….Do not let him have any money

Unbit….Try and sober up

Charter….Any information you may see fit to let me (or us) have will be gratefully received and treated strictly confidential.

Hopefully the person operating the telegraph or delivering the telegram did not moonlight at the theatre. I wonder how often someone received:

Unarm. Unasked. Unawed. Unbar.

Advertisement for scenic artist John Rettig from the 1894 Donaldson Guide

The Cincinnati Enquirer reported “Mr. Donaldson was a member of the Masonic Order and Odd Fellows, to which he devoted much attention” (2 Aug. 1925, page 5). Donaldson passed away in 1925. An article in the “Cincinnati Enquirer” reported that “Colonel Donaldson founded the Billboard and published it until two years. Ago. He was interested in prison reform, employed many former convicts upon release from prison, and declared that he was never defrauded by any of them” (4 Aug. 1925, page 2). He was survived by his widow Jennie (Hassan) and daughter Marjorie (Mrs. Roger S. Littleford), his father William H. and three brothers (Andrew, Lincoln and Archibald) and two sisters (Mrs. Charles Longley and Mrs. Dr. George W. Brown). Donaldson’s death in Sarasota Florida at the relatively young age of 61 came as a shock to his family. Having been in failing health for some time, he came to Sarasota at the suggestion of his friends, Charles and John Ringling (The Jacksonville Daily Journal, 2 Aug. 1925, page 3).

Advertisements in the 1894 Donaldson Guide

To be continued…