On November 30, 2022, I received a FB message from Robert Van Dillen, a St. Louis-based scenic artist. He asked if I would consider being guest speaker for an upcoming scenic art event in St. Louis, tentatively scheduled for the beginning of 2023. Van Dillen explained that there was a group of local scenic artists who wanted to see the St. Louis Scottish Rite scenery collection before the building was sold. Unfortunately, the tentative date coincided with my trip to the Galveston Scottish Rite. We looked at a couple of possibilities, and then scheduled the event to coincide with my March trip to USITT.
My last visit to the St. Louis Scottish Rite theatre also coincided with USITT in 2017. This is a remarkable scenery collection delivered by Toomey & Volland, of St. Louis. I spent much of the conference documenting the scenery, stage machinery, and building.
Tomoey & Volland Studio stencil on the back of a Scottish Rite backdrop.
Just prior to the conference, I documented the gridiron with Rick Boychuk and Richard Nix.
High above the St. Louis Scottish Rite stage with Rick Boychuk and Richard Nix in 2017.
One of many photos from my trip to the St. Louis Scottish Rite Theatre in 2017.
On this trip, I arrived at the St. Louis Scottish Rite by 9AM on Sunday morning, March 19, 2023. I was accompanied by my close friend and colleague, Jenny Knott. Alessia Carpoca, Mike Monsos, and Martha (University of Montana – Missoula) soon joined us, as they had an early flight to catch; one that prevented them from staying for the entire presentation. From 9-10:30 a.m., we shifted furniture, set up the power point, and double checked the lines. I wanted to make sure that everything was in working order for my presentation. This also provided Mike, Alessia, and Martha, with the opportunity to see some of the drops before their early departure. I am very grateful to Mike for handling the operating lines during this time!
At 10:30 a.m., I gave a quick power-point presentation to provide some context, placing what we were going to see within the context of American scenic art and theatre history. By “quick” I mean thirty minutes! Then we brought in one scene after another for the next three hours. By 2 p.m. I called it quits, due my impending flight and grumbling stomach. We grabbed a quick bit to eat and then I was on my way to the airport.
The St. Louis Scottish Rite Theatre is a sight to behold. It is a three-thousand-seat auditorium that boasts a 90’-0” wide proscenium opening.
The St. Louis Scottish Rite auditorium. Looking up into the flies at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Scenery by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.
The size and scope of this Masonic scenery collection is almost unparalleled, with the McAlester Scottish Rite from 1929 being a major contender. There are 147 line sets, with stage machinery and scenery produced by the Toomey & Volland studio in 1923. There are a few drops that pre-date the building, a couple more that were delivered in later years.
The Scenic Studio where the St. Louis Scottish Rite scenery was painted in 1923.
Sadly, this may be the last time I get to visit and examine this remarkable scenery collection. Like many massive Masonic buildings, it is up for sale. Rumors of a sale had already begun in 2017. This is not surprising, considering a series of obstacles faced by many fraternal organizations; challenges that range from declining membership and insufficient funds to high utility bills and a long-term practice of deferred maintenance. My only hope is that when the building is sold, the scenery is somehow preserved for future generations. This collection really needs to be professionally documented, complete with lights and props, before it disappears.
Many thanks to Rob for organizing this event. I also want to thank his wonderful colleagues who so warmly welcomed me to St. Louis. I am grateful that we were able to share this experience together.
Here are a few pictures from our day at the St. Louis Scottish Rite.
A painted scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.Metallic strips that make the foliage sparkle under stage light.My host, Rob Van Dillen behind a section of theatrical gauze.Scenic artists at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.Changing scenes at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.A few of the scenic artists who gathered at the Scottish Rite on March 19, 2023.Scenic Artists at the St. Louis Scottish Rite on March 19, 2023.Painted detail from the carpenter shop scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Landscape backdrop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a landscape drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a landscape drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.The Camp Scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.
In January, I was contacted by Diane Nagy, President of the Kimmswick Historical Society. For geographical context, Kimmswick, Missouri, is a very small river town about 26 miles south of St. Louis. The Kimmswick Historical Society had recently acquired a large painting by J. U. Tschudi. Dated 1914, the artist titled the painting, “Early Days on the Mississippi River.” While searching for information about the artist, Nagy stumbled across my post about Tschudi at www.drypigment.net. Tschudi represented the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887. This firm was affiliated with the Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio in Chicago. The two firms shared projects and artists over the decades, remaining affiliates until the 1920s.
My trip to St. Louis for the United States Institute of Theatre Technology conference this month provided me with an opportunity to examine the Tschudi painting and meet Kimmswick Historical Society members. On March 18, I journeyed south, accompanied by my close friend and colleague, Jenny Knott. Diane Nagy and Nadine Garland provided shuttle service and conversation for the day. We spent most of the afternoon chatting about historical artifacts and the intriguing history of Kimmswick.
Our first stop was to see the oil painting, currently stored at the studio of Irek T. Szelag. Szelag is a Polish immigrant nearing retirement. In fact, this will be his last commission. We were joined at Szelag’s studio by a few other Historical Society members; they were curious to about hear about my knowledge of Tschudi and his work. The decision to preserve Tschudi’s work was hotly contested by half of the ten-member Kimmswick Historical Society Board of Directors, necessitating a tie-breaking vote by the president. Not everyone was keen to spend a large amount of money on this heavily damaged painting.
Painting by J. U. Tschudi at Szelag’s studio on March 18, 2023.
The Kimmswick Historical Society is a small non-profit organization that does not accept State or Federal aid. Their operating budget is obtained through donations and the sale of apple butter. The funding of every Historical Society project is translated into the sale of “jars” and “cars.” “Jars” refers to the sale of apple butter and “cars” refers to the sale of parking spots when thousands of people descend upon this small town of 146 residents for the Apple Butter Festival https://gokimmswick.com/apple-butter-festival-kimmswick/ . Each year, the Historical Society sells approximately 6000 jars of apple butter. Of this amount, 500 jars are still made on site, using a massive copper kettle over an open fire. By the way, each jar of apple butter sells for $6; a fabulous deal, considering the extensive amount of time is takes to prep, cook and can the apples.
The Kimmswick Historical Society stand at the Apple Butter Festival.Apple butter pot on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.
Back to Tschudi’s artwork…
When I initially examined pictures of Tschudi’s painting, I was struck by his inclusion of a title and painted surround. It looked more like circus banner than an oil painting intended for a residential wall. In fact, it reminded me of early twentieth-century state displays at world fairs or other industrial expositions. Upon close inspection, I notice that the edges of the canvas had been hemmed, like early marketing banners that were intended to advertise a public entertainment. I am positive that this artwork was created to be tacked onto a wall, the side of a building, or fence; advertising some public event or spectacle.
Hemmed edge of the Tschudi painting.Title and painted frame of the Tschudi painting.
After leaving Szelag’s studio, we spent the remainder of the afternoon touring the Kimmswick Historical Society and enjoying a fabulous lunch at the oldest building in town. Designated, “The Old House” this structure was originally built in 1770. The reason for selecting tis particular eating establishment was that Tschudi’s painting once hung in a front room, near a fire place; a fireplace that never vented properly, hence the discoloration of the painting over time.
Wall where the Tschudi painting was once located in the Old House.Sketch of the Old House in Kimmswick, currently on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.
In addition to lunch, our hosts gifted us Kimmswick Historical Society cookbooks upon our departure. It is one of the more interesting compilations of Midwest and Southern recipes that I have come across in recent year. Yes, the apple butter recipe is included too! Overall, I had a delightful time learning about Kimmswick and its history.
The Kimmswick Historical Society Cookbook includes the recipe for their apple butter.
While sitting in the St. Louis airport on March 19, I began to re-examine the life and career of J. U. Tschudi, searching for possible clues that might lead to the origin of his painting. This quest continued upon my return home. I arrived sick and began a week-long quarantine in the basement, desperately trying to keep my germs to myself. My son’s High School Orchestra was spending the first part of Spring Break in New York City. I really didn’t want him to catch this bug. Fortunately, my self-imposed quarantine provided me with an opportunity to re-examine Tschudi’s life and career. My previous post about Tschudi from 2020 was quite brief, intended as only a side story to my history about the Kansas City Scenic Company. Tschudi was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co., working alongside B. F. Dunn and C. A. Oldham.
Here is my expanded tale about this fascinating artist and painting.
Like many nineteenth-century American immigrants, the story of Tschudi begins in Europe and ends in the Midwest. His tale could be called “From Switzerland to St. Louis,” was he passed away at 728 South Second Street, only a short walk from the Convention Center that hosted USITT. Both Tschudi and his son worked as scenic artists for the Kansas City Scenic Art Co. during the early Twentieth Century. Combined, they are responsible for hundreds of stage settings delivered throughout the United States between 1880 and 1940.
John Ulrich Tschudi was born on March 22, 1850, in Switzerland. Named after his father, he was the son of Johann Ulrich Tschudy (1822-1886) and Anna Margaretha Egli (1821-). In 1856, the Tschudi family emigrated to the United States with his family. They departed a ship named the Ocean Steed on March 22, 1856 – Tschudy’s 6th birthday. Passengers included John Ulrich Tschudy (34 yrs.), wife Ann Mary (35 yrs.), and children Cath (10 yrs.), Valentin (8 yrs.), Margaretha (7 yrs.), John M. (6 yrs.), Walter (4 yrs.), Tobias (11 mths.). Ann Mary’s father, W. Egli (59 yrs.) also sailed on the same ship. They arrived in the US on July 30, 1856, and soon settled in Burlington, Iowa. Two other Tschudy children were born after moving to Iowa- Minnie (b. 1856) and Lily (b. 1859).
I am going to take a moment to discuss historical records and reported names for John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr. First of all, the family used both Tschudy and Tschudi as their surname in city directories, public records, and newspaper articles. This shift primarily occurred in the 1870s. For the purpose of this post, I will use both.
Secondly, the “U” for Ulrich was often misrepresented as an M, W, A, or even H. This is understandable when you begin to examine how a handwritten cursive capital U can look like other letters, especially in passenger lists and census reports.
To further muddy the waters, there was another Swiss emigrant named John Ulrich Tschudi/Tschudy (1828-1901) who settled in Minnesota. He is a completely different individual who has greatly confused many family genealogists. Minnesota Tschudi lived his life as a farmer, while the main characters of my story – John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. (1822-1886) and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr. (1850-1921) – who worked as a German Presbyterian Church pastor and scenic artist, respectively. With this little bit of information, here is the tale of scenic artist J. U. Tschudi.
In later years, Tschudi Jr. recounted that the Tschudi family only stayed in Burlington for two years before relocating to Memphis, Tennessee, where “he learned his business under the tutelage of his father, who was also an artist.” I can neither confirm nor disprove this statement, as evaded public record until the onset of the Civil War.
By 1861, Tschudi Sr. enlisted in the Union Army. Tschudi Sr. is listed in the “US Adjutant General Military Records, 1631-1976,” available at ancestry.com. The 1864-1864 report lists “John Ulrich Tschudy” of Burlington, Iowa, as a Private in Co. G. of the 57th Illinois Infantry. At the age of 38, he entered into military service on August 26, 1861. Co. G. rendezvoused in Chicago and was quartered at Camp Douglas. Tschudi Jr. was too young to enlist; the official enlistment age was 18 yrs. old. Again, to make things even more confusing, Minnesota Tschudi also fought in the Civil War (Minnesota Infantry, 2nd Regiment).
By 1867, the Tschudy family was living in Dubuque, Iowa. Between 1867 and 1869, Tschudi Sr. is listed as a student at the German Seminary. After completing his studies in Dubuque, In 1867, Tschudi Jr. is listed as a student. It is in Dubuque that Tschudi Jr. meets his future wife, Marguerite Merkes (1850-1931). Merkes is exactly the same age as, Tschudi Jr., was born on March 23, 1850, in Diekirch Luxembourg. Merkes was the daughter of Jean Pierre Merckes/John Peter Merkes (1811-1861) and Clara L. Abend/Abendt (1817-1895). The Merkes family emigrated from Luxembourg to Dubuque, Iowa in 1859, with John Peter Merkes passing in 1864. His widow, Clara Abendt Merkes, remarried in 1864. Her second husband was Michael Fohrman (1811-1894), also an emigrant from Luxembourg.
In 1867, Clara’s 17-yrs. old daughter, Marguerite Merkes, becomes pregnant. As an unwed mother, Marguerite is removed to Chicago where she waits for the impending arrival of her first born. On August 1, 1868, Marguerite gives birth to a son whom she names John, after the baby’s father John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr. It is important to note that the actual birth year of baby John’s birthdate vacillates over the years, ranging from 1867-1869.
Two things happen at this point; decisions that were very characteristic when a child was born out of wedlock. First, the baby is born, but then raised by a grandparent. In this case, baby John returned to Dubuque where he was raised by his maternal grandmother, Clara Abendt Merkes Forman, and his, maternal step-grandfather, Michael Fohrman. John Merkes name instantly becomes John J. Fohrman, and he is clearly listed as the son of Michael and Clara Fohrman. It is only in Michael Fohrman’s will that John J. Fohrman is listed as an “adopted son.” Despite the eventual marriage of John’s parents, Marguerite Merkes and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr., their son is never returned to their care.
In the meantime, Tschudi Sr. completes his training at the Germany Seminary in Dubuque and answers his first call in Platteville, Wisconsin (1870),where he relocates with his wife and four daughters (Margaretha, Lucy, Minnie, and Lillie). Tschudi Jr. and Marguerite remain in Iowa. In 1869, Tschudi Jr.’s occupation was listed as “cigar maker” in the Dubuque Directory; this was when he was living with his father at “Couler av bet Nineteenth and Twentieth.”
By 1872, Tschudi Sr, answers a call to ministry in Memphis, Tennessee. During this entire time, Rev. J. U. Tschudi is associated with the German Presbyterian Church. He is repeatedly listed in the newspapers. During this period, Memphis struggles with yellow fever, losing thousands of its citizens to five major outbreaks. On Oct 15, 1873, “The Central Presbyterian” of Richmond, VA, reported, “Another Bereavement – Rev. J. A. Tschudy, pastor of the German Presbyterian church in Memphis, lost his son, Walter, Oct. 6th, in his 23rd year of his age, of yellow fever” (page 2). This was part of the fourth Yellow fever epidemic in Memphis, where 2500 people passed away between Aug and Oct of that year. At the time it constituted the largest yellow fever outbreak in any inland city. A few months later, the Tschudi family is able to celebrate the marriage of Margaretha Tschudi to minister, Henry A. Grentzenberg. I have yet to locate any mention of Tschudi J. in Memphis during this time. Rev. J. U. Tschudi is last mentioned in Memphis newspapers during 1878. At the time, he was associated with the First German Presbyterian Church, located on the corner of Venice and DeSoto streets. I have yet to uncover any information that links Tschudi Jr. to Memphis. Although he likely traveled throughout the country painting scenery, he married and celebrated the birth of two children in Iowa between 1871 and 1875.
In later years, Tschudi Jr. suggested an alternative story, explaining that from 1868 to 1873 he studied art in Europe. This is highly suspect, especially since he married Marguerite Merkes in Dubuque, Iowa in October 1871 and began raising a family in Iowa by 1873. Daughter Lucy was born in the spring of 1873, with her younger sister, Minnie Lillian, arriving in the spring of 1875. Later newspaper articles about Tschudi Jr. purported, “After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ’I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad.” I have yet to locate any information that suggests his father ever worked as an artist, but you never know.
Here is what I have tracked down about Tschudi Jr.’s scenic art career; a tale compiled from city directories, historical records, and newspaper headlines.
By the late 1870s, Tschudi begins working with Cincinnati fresco artist, William Theodore Blomberg (1829-1909). Tschudi Jr. has several relations in Cincinnati, including his older sister Margaretha (Margaretha Tschudy Grentzenberg). In 1880, Tschudi and Blomberg head to Kansas, where they work as itinerant artists throughout the region that year. Blomberg returns to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi remaining in Kansas.
The first line of Tschudi’s biographical listing entry in “Cutler’s History of Kansas” is “JOHN U. TSCHUDI, fresco and scenic artist, came to Kansas in July 1880.” He arrived a bit earlier than that as Tschudi is mentioned in a Kansas newspaper advertisement that June. On June 16, 1880, the “Augusta Republican” of Augusta, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, painters and frescoers are on hand according to promise and ready to do any kind of fancy work in their line at reasonable rates. Call and leave your orders” (page 3).
Tschudi initially settled in Wichita, before relocating to Emporia. His initial tie to Wichita was to the newly constructed opera house; he and Blomberg were credited with the scenery, as well as their ties to Cincinnati. They were mentioned in letter published in the “McPherson Republican” on August 12, 1880:
“Elk Falls Letter.
Elk Falls, August 9th, 1880.
Editors Republican:- Since leaving McPherson two weeks ago we have taken in the counties of Marion, Butler, Sedgewick, Cowley, Sumner, and now we are now in Elk. From Florence we ran down the Eldorado Branch to Eldorado, the county seat of Butler, and from thence to Augusta by stage. In this town, situated on the St. Louis & San Fransico line to Wichita, we were somewhat surprised to find a regular opera hall, and our surprise was somewhat increased in visiting the hall, to find everything first class. In the construction of the stage, etc., Mr. Israel Zimmerman, the stage carpenter proved himself to be a master of his profession. Messrs. Tschudi & Blomburg, the scenic artists, whose headquarters are at Cincinnati, Ohio, were completing the advertising drop curtain when we were there. They will have one forest scene, six wings, one street scene, one rustic kitchen scene, four wings; one garden and landscape scene, two wings; one prison scene, four wings, and one scenic drop curtain. The stage is arched and the arch is frescoed. The work when done will give them an opera hall to be envied by many towns double their population…” (page 2).
On October 16, 1880, the “Cowley County Monitor” of Winfield, Kansas, reported, Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the fresco artists, are at work on M. L. Robinson’s residence. They also have engagements with J. C. Fuller and M. L. Read. Our citizens who want fresco work cannot do better than secure these gentlemen” (page 3).
On Nov. 25, “The Sumner County Press” of Wellington, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the artists who did scene painting and fresco work for the opera hall here, also did some fresco paintings on the dwellings of M. L. Reed, S. H. Myton and M. L. Robinson. They have now gone to Wellington to fresco the hall of the PRESS building. On their return they will commence work on Mr. Fulton’s fine dwelling. If the Presbyterians and the Methodists would have their churches frescoed in first class style it would be worth bragging about. Tschudi and Blomberg have done the best work in the State.- Winfield Monitor”(page 3).
Despite their success, Blimberg returned to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi settling in Wichita. It remains unclear as to when Tschudi’s family joined him in Kansas. However, in 1881, Tschudi was living in Wichita. On Oct. 31, 1881, “The Daily Leader” of Wichita reported, “John W. Tschudy, the artist of Wichita, went to Emporia yesterday to paint the scenery in the new Opera House in that town” (page 4). A month later, his ties to Cincinnati were mentioned in an Emporia newspaper. On Nov. 29, 1881, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley Opera House” (page 4).
Tschudi soon partnered with stage carpenter, J. W. Morris, to deliver scenery and stage machinery to the Whitley Opera House. On Dec. 1, 1881, “The Emporia Ledger” reported “Messrs. John W. Tschudi, scenic painter, and J. W. Morris, stage carpenter, the gentlemen who have the contract to furnish and fit the scenery and stage trappings of the Whitley Opera House, commenced work yesterday. They will put in a complete set of scenes and all the latest improvements in stage equipment. They say they find everything about the house in excellent shape for their work, and that they will be able to compete their contract in six or seven weeks. Their work will be so well advanced by the first of January that the house may be used at that time, of desired” (page 3). That same day, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley opera house” (page 3). Tschudi was repeatedly mentioned in Emporia newspapers.
Tschudi continued to work in Emporia. On Jan. 26, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported that Tschudi was painting scenery for Ed White’s touring production of ‘Fantanitza,’ scheduled to visit Emporia in March, detailing, “He left an order with Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist who has been employed for some weeks past at the Whitely opera house, for some scenery to be used in bringing out the grand illumination tableau in ‘Fantanitza” The article also mentioned Tschudi’s current work at the Whitley reporting, “There is also a water main behind the drop curtain on the stage with sufficient hose attached to reach over the flys. The scenery has been done by that skillful and well-known artist, John Tcheudy of Switzerland, and is a marvel of beauty…The scenery is sized with fireproof sizing and cannot be kindled into a blaze…” Tschudi’s work at the Whitley certainly boosted his career. On Feb 2. 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported “The stage, one of the best in the west, is 30-x60 feet and is furnished with all the accessories of a metropolitan theatre. These include a variety of excellent scenery suitable for the preparation of all classes of drama; complete and secured appliances for shifting lights, and an exquisite drop curtain representing a charming scene on the Rhine, painted by Mr. Tshudi, one of the most talented scenic artists in the country” (page 3).
The Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, featured scenery by J. U. Tschudi and W. T. Blomberg.An interior view of the Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, c, 1898.
Tschudi’s success in Emporia soon prompted him to relocate there from Wichita. Initially, he set up a studio at the Whitley Opera House. On March 22 and 23, 1882, “The Evening News” in Emporia announced, “You will find John W. Tschudi at the Whitley opera house ready to do all kinds of house painting, kalsomining, frescoe decorating, plain and fancy sign writing, etc. First-class work at reasonable rates, guaranteed” (page 4). He continued to place one advertisement after another in local papers, securing a variety of local projects that ranged from private residences to commercial signs. On April 8, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Two of the handsomest signs in town were placed in position this morning at the entrance of Robert Jeff’s tobacco ad cigar emporium on Commercial street. They were painted by Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitley opera house and cannot fail to attract attention” (page 4). On April 20, 1882, The Weekly News-Democrat” reported, “A very handsome altar recently completed by the Roberts Brothers has been placed in the upper room of the Franciscan convent, which is used at present as a place of worship for the congregation. The painting, which is beautiful and highly artistic, was done by John Tschudi, scenic artist at the Whitley opera house.” (page 4).
Tschudi landed so many projects at this time, that it became necessary to hire an assistant. On April 15, 1882, “The Evening News” (page 4) reported, “W. S. Walborn, a sign painter, lately of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, is assisting Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitely Opera House” (page 3). This announcement was also published on April 20, 1882, in “The Emporia Weekly News.” In later years, both Tschudi and Walborn worked as scenic artists as the Kansas City Scenic Co.
Tschudi’s work was drawing other prospective theatre proprietors to Wichita to see his work. . On April 22, 1882, and on April 27, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Friday evening we had a pleasant call from Mr. Samuel Smith and a Mr. A. W. Barker, both of Ottawa, Kansas. These gentlemen were in the city for the purpose of viewing the Whitley Opera house, more particularly the stage appointments and scenery. Last evening the opera house was lighted, and they were shown through it, and expressed themselves as much pleased with the result of their inspection. The new opera house in Ottawa is about completed, and it was with a view to gaining some points as to scenery, etc., that these gentlemen visited Emporia. They were greatly pleased with the Whitley opera house stage scenery, and it is not unlikely that Mr. Tschudi, the artist, will secure a contract of the same at Ottawa” (page 3).
All the while, Tschudi continued to run a series of advertisements in local newspapers. Here are a few of note:
On July 27, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” announced, “John Tschudi, the Whitley opera house scenic artist, sent a number of ornamental signs to Colorado yesterday.”
On July 29, 1882, Tschudi’s advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” stated, “Signs! Signs! —In Japanese, East Lake, Queen Anne, and Oriental styles by Tschudi, the artist. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store.”
By summer, Tschudi had customers placing orders at Moore’s Drug Store. An advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” on July 29, 1882, announced “Let the work speak for itself,” is my motto, Tschudi, Artist, Fresco Decorator, Ornamental Painter, and Sign Writer. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” and “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” (page 4). Tschudi’s ads ran continuously until October 1882.
On Aug. 15, 1882, and the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (page 4).
His association with Moore’s drug store, meant that Tschudi needed someone to take orders, while he traveled for work. This ensured a constant stream of income when he returned from out-of-town projects. On Oct 18, 1882, “The Evening News” reported, “John Tschudi, the scenic artist, returned to-day from Wellington, where he has been painting the scenery for the new opera house at that place” (page 1). Despite his absences, Tschudi would advertise, “Remember that Tschudi, the artist, is still here, and will do you the highest and latest artistic style, and at bottom figures. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (Emporia Daily News, Oct 18, 1882, page 4). On Dec 21, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Tschudi has made a large transparent street sign which will be placed in position soon and bear the letters ‘Ice cream and oysters.’ The same artist prepared the beautiful parlor screen upon whose surface are painted six different attractive designs in oil” (page 3).
By 1883, Tschudi was included in the Emporia Directory. Interestingly, his listing suggests pervious work in Tennessee, and not Wichita or Cincinnati: “Tschudi, John U., fr Tenn., ornamental frescoe scenic painting, and sign writer, shop 197 Commercial st, res same.” His wife was also listed in the directory at the same address. Marguerite began going by Margaret.
Painting projects for 1883 included G. T. Carlton’s Billiard Hall and Fithian’s Ice wagon in Emporia. On Feb 20, 1883, “The Evening News” reported, “Mr. G. T. Carlton to-day opened to the public his handsome new billiard parlor in the Soden building on Fifth Avenue. Tschudi. The artist has been busy for several weeks past frescoing the walls of the room and the result of his skillful hand is seen in the excellent effects he has produced…” (page 4).
On April 19, 1883, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported “A Thing of Beauty. Fithian’s ice wagon made its first trip for the season Thursday, and it attracted as much attention as a circus chariot as it rolled along the street resplendent in brilliant colors and decorations by the brush of Tschudi, the scenic artist. The arctic sketches on the sides are excellent works of art, and it will be refreshing to even look at them when the mercury begins to crawl up into the sky parlor of thermometer” (page 1).
However, he continued to paint stage scenery for a variety of venues throughout the region. On March 22, 1883, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “John Tschudi has received an order to paint a set of scenes for the Amateur Dramatic club of Newton” (page 4).
On May 17, 1883, “The Weekly News-Democrat” reported on the dedication of the Welsh Congregational Church on Merchants Street” (page 1). Of the new auditorium, the article reported that sections of ornamental plaster work were “artistically frescoed by Tschudi, the scenic artist, whose happy combination of complimentary colors and agreeable shades proclaim him an artist of superior merit…”
On October 19, 1883, the “Iola Register” reported, “Mr. J. N. Tschudi has been at work in the opera house all week and has made quite a change there. In addition to the business cards which adorn the front of the stage, Mr. Tschudi has been painting a new and elegant drop curtains which he expects to have ready by Saturday night. He has also made new and larger wings, to correspond with each scene, and before he leaves will paint the woodwork on the front of the stage. He expects to finish his work sometime next week, and the opera house will certainly ne much handsomer for his having been there” (page 5).
On Dec. 1, 1883, “The Humboldt Union” of Humboldt, Kansas, credited Tschudi with delivering scenery to the Germania Hall. The article reported, “The scenery [described in detail] and the arch of the stage is handsomely decorated. The artist, John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, has performed his work in first class style” (page 3).
As in the past, Tschudi was not working alone, nor was he simply hiring local amateurs. A variety of skilled personalities were working for Tschudi in Emporia, including Charles Stebbins. On May 2, 1883, “Emporia Daily News” and “Evening News” reported, “Charles Stebbins, who is employed by Tschudi, the artist and painter, has returned from Hartford, Michigan, where he recently fell heir to a legacy of $1,000” (page 1).
Tschudi began to secure an abundance of scenic work for stages throughout Kansas. On Jan 25, 1884, “The Weekly Kansas” of Independence reported, “Of all the improvements made during the past year in Independence there are none in which so much interest is felt as in the Opera House block erected by Mr. Payne….The stage is large and commodious, it being 24×66 feet, with four dressing rooms, and the footlights are fixed with a lever so they can be shut off or put in place at will. It will be supplied with good scenery. Mr. John Tschudi. The artist, is now here for that purpose. He comes highly recommended as a scenic painter. There will be thirteen sets of scenes and fifteen set scenes” (page 4). While working on a theater project, however, Tschudi would land a variety of other painting projects. Such was the case in Chanute, Kansas. On Aug. 28, 1884, the “Chanute Blade” of Chanute, Kansas reported, “The Chanute Bank is being neatly frescoed by John U. Tschudi, and will be one of the nicest finished rooms in the city when completed” (page 3).
Tschudi’s comings and goings were announced in a variety of small-town newspapers, making it easy to trace his travels. For example, On Oct. 16, 1884, “The Chanute Blade” reported, “John U. Tschudi went to Kansas City last Tuesday, to paint some new scenery and drop curtains at Kansas City. He painted two very beautiful scenes for Williams’ Hall in this city, last week. He will return here in about two weeks to paint the scenes and drop curtain for the new opera house now being erected here” (page 3). Tschudi was also working on the new stage setting for an opera house in Red Cloud, Nebraska. On October 16, 1885, the “Webster County Argus” of Red Cloud reported, “The proprietors of the opera house expect to have the same opened on Monday, the 26th inst. A good dramatic company has been engaged for the occasion. The house will be seated with six hundred chairs. Prof. Tschudi, the scenic artist, with a force of carpenters in making and placing the scenery, which will consist of eight complete settings, besides a handsome drop curtain.”
Sometime between the fall of 1885 and 1886, Tschudi moved to Kansas City, By 1887, he was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. The firm’s offices were located in the Gillis Opera House.
The Gillis Opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.A photograph of the Gillis opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.
This is where it gets interesting, and a little confusing. Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio outfitted the Gillis, with L. L. Graham and W. P. Davis working as the scenic artists on the project, while representing the firm. Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis opened a branch office in Kansas City in 1884; it was headed by L. L. Graham. At the same time, Graham and Davis also operated a studio, known as Graham & Davis, frequently working as subcontractors for Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis’ work for the Gillis was well-known and mentioned in a variety of newspapers. For example, on April 21, 1887, “The Times” of Clay Center, Kansas, reported that Sosman & Landis had “fitted the Gillis Opera House, Kansas City, and the Grand at Topeka.” Graham’s Studio in Kansas City, the Kansas City Scenic Co. and Sosman & Landis’ scenic studio were not directly competing in the region, they were divvying up work and sharing artists. Even in 1888, Dunn was listed as not only a scenic artist at Graham’s Studio, but also on staff at the Kansas City Scenic Studio. By 1890, an new iteration of the Kansas City Scenic Co. opened, solely under the management of Dunn and J. C. Bronaugh. On July 13, 1891, the Kansas Patron commented that Bronaugh was “the traveling member of the Kansas City Scenic Co.” Bronaugh secured the contracts and Dunn painted the scenery. This new iteration of the firm still maintained a close business alliance with the Sosman & Landis until the 1920s.
In 1887, Kansas City Scenic Co. advertisements list J. U. Tschudi, B. F. Dunn, C. A. Oldham and C. J. Lorella. On March 22, 1887, the “Wichita Star” reported “A reporter was shown the number of samples from scenic-artist work from the brush of Kansas City Scenic-Artist company, in which company figures, as an artist, Mr. J. W. Tschudi, formerly of the city. The work is artistic and ranges throughout the entire term of scenic work. Landscapes, rocky passes, woods, streets, palaces, parlors, chambers, kitchens, hovels – in fact every known term of scenic effects were painted in the highest style of art. The JOURNAL congratulates Mr. Tschudi on the excellent work of the firm in which his brush is prominent” (page 4).
On June 16, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” of Little River, Kansas, reported, “The carpenters’ work on the new opera hall is going on at a lively rate, Canfield & Co. are doing the work in good shape. Messrs. Tschudi, Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job.” On June 18, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” reported, “Messrs. Tschudi Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job. The mammoth drop curtain is a beauty. It is ornamented with the business cards of our merchants and others and will be first class in every particular.”
On May 20, 1887, “The Lyons Daily Democrat” in Lyons, Kansas, reported, “Mess. Tschudi, Dunn, and Oldham, scenic artists from Kansas City, are preparing a very fine new drop curtain for Tom’s Butler’s Opera House. Tom very properly thinks the public would be pleased to have a brand new curtain to gaze at between acts. The gentlemen represent a firm of scenic artists who are furnishing many of the finest Opera Houses in Kansas with stage settings, and our citizens must admit, when their work is first shown, they understand their business thoroughly and are first-class artists in every respect. They will furnish scenery for the fine new opera house at Wichita, and when Lyon’s new Opera House looms up, they will probably again have an opportunity to display their artistic powers” (page 3).
On October 22, 1887, “The Caldwell News” of Caldwell, Kansas, reported, “Judge J. G. Woods is now moving into his new building this week. The lower story is occupied by the Woods bank, This room is elegantly fitted up in solid walnut. The south room is occupied by C. E. Flaudro’s clothing house. The opera house occupies the second story. It is the same size as the Crawford Opera House at Topeka. The stage is 50 feet wide and 25 feet deep and is furnished with fifteen complete sets of scenery including an elegant drop curtain painted by the artist John U. Tschudi…” (page 1) [reprinted on Oct 12, 1922, p 1].
On Dec. 1, 1887, “The Kingman Courier” reported, “Prof. John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, will have completed the scenic work at Garfield Opera House by the 6th of December. The scenes painted by this talented artist display true genius, combined with the highest-class conceptions of the true and beautiful. When completed the Garfield Opera house will surpass anything of a similar character in Kansas” (page 6).
Tschudi also painted scenery for the Garfield Opera House in Kingman, Kansas. The time he was traveling with a stage mechanic named Mr. Foreman. On Dec. 7, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Tschudi, the scenic artist, and Foreman, the stage builder of the Garfield Opera House, will be given a benefit by the amateurs of Kingman Saturday night. They are worthy gentlemen and the entertainment in their interest should be ell attended” (page 3). On
On Dec. 12, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported “Messrs. Tschudi & Foreman desire to return their sincere thanks to the ladies and gentlemen who so kindly assisted at their benefit on Saturday evening last and thereby insured its success, And they also hope that those who by their presence graced the auditorium enjoyed a peasant evening” (page 3).
Dec. 22, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Prof. John Tschudi, artist at the Garfield Opera House, will pass the holidays with his family at Kansas City” (page 3). This indicates that Tschudi moved his family from Emporia to Kansas City when he became associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887.
By 1888, Tschudi had left the Kansas City Scenic Co. and had established Tschudi, Loffing, & Roberts at 400 East 12th in Kansas City. His new business partners were Albert Roberts and Antoine Loffing. Tschudi’s residential address was listed as R. 1731 Walnut.
On Feb. 1, 1888, “The Kingman Daily Courier” of Kingman, Kansas, reported, “Prof. Tschudi is, beyond all doubt, the thorough, classical scenic artist in Kansas. His fine conceptions of mountain and sea, of glen and valley, of hill and dell, when spread upon canvass by his deft hand, are gems of beauty on which the eye fondly hangs. The COURIER heartily commends Prof. Tschudi to the managers of the Greensburg Opera House.” (page 5).
The Tschudi’s relocated to Omaha, Nebraska, by 1890. Tschudi is working as the scenic artist at the Eden Musee, living at 1108 Farnam. Interestingly, John S. Tschudi, artist, also listed 1108 Farnam as his address for 1890 and 1891. This may be a double listing, or John S. is actually Tschudi Jr.’s son, John Fohrman; the baby that was born out of wedlock and raised by maternal grandparents, Clara and Michael Fohrman. By 1890, John is over 21 years old. It is very possible that he reunited with his biological father and began working as an artist. The Tschudi Family continued live in Omaha, with Tschudi’s daughters also securing employment.
The 1892 Omaha Directory listed:
Tschudi John S, scenic artist Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th
Tschudi Lucy Miss, folder O Ptg Co, res 612 S 18th
Tschudi Minnie, candy stand Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th
The 1893 Omaha Directory listed:
Tschudi John U, scenic artist, Wonderland, res. 612 S 18th
Tschudi Lucy, clk Candy stand Wonderland, bds 612 S 18th
Miss Minnie, folder Klopp & Bartlett Co., res 612 S 18th
Tschudi’s 1892 connection with Eden Musee also makes Indiana’s newspapers. On Jan 25, 1893, “The Indianapolis News” reported, “No Chance for an Eden Musee. For two weeks past T. U. Tschudi, a scenic artist, who has been in the museum business for some years, and Mme. L. Brouillard have been staying at the Circle Park Hotel. Together they have been looking for a suitable building in which to start Eden Musee in New York. The only building in the city that seemed available was the Speigel & Thomas building on Washington street, but Mr. Tschudi was unable to agree on the amount of security that he should give for the lease, and could not make a satisfactory arrangement with the owner” (page 2).
This particular moment signals a shift for Tschudi Jr. and his family, possibly indicating a temporary separation from his wife. His family returns to Kansas City where Tschudi rejoins them in 1897.
During the mid-1890s, Tschudi Jr. heads east, traveling throughout Indiana and Kentucky.
On Aug. 28, 1895, the “Richmond Item” of Richmond, Indiana, reported, “Beautiful Scenery. The Phillips Opera House Greatly Improved and There will be a pleasing surprise to those who attend ton-night. Manager Dobbins has not been idle this summer. He has one of the country’s finest scenic artists at work in the Phillips Opera House for several months, and to day there is completed one of the most elaborate outfits of scenery to be found in the state. Artist Tschudi’s taste in this line of work is not to be equaled, and he has painted thirteen beautiful sets of scenery for the theatre, which must be seen to be properly appreciated. Last night a display was made of new property, and the few persons who were given special invitations to be present were more than delighted. There is nothing which adds more to the enjoyment of first-class performance than appropriate scenic effects and this year the patrons of the Phillips will find that all stage settings will be elaborate. Besides this plentiful supply of new scenery Manager Dobbins has gone further. Another new drop curtain has been painted by Mr. Tschudi, and it is a rare specimen of his artistic skill. The big curtain is rich in its coloring, and almost perfect in its execution. The central figure is a splendid reproduction of Turner’s celebrated painting of “The Harbor in Venice,” and it is a picture the eye does not tire to look upon. The stage of the Phillips, which is one of the largest in the state, has been thoroughly renovated and painted and it presents a neat and clean appearance. The entire auditorium will be re-frescoed within a few days, this portion of the work not having yet been completed. The opera house is now in better trim than ever before and the patrons who are in attendance at the opening this evening will not be long in distinguishing this fact” (page 3).
On Aug 24, 1895, “The Richmond item” reported, “Almost finished. Scenic artist Tschudi who has been in Richmond all summer will still be ‘one of us’ for a considerable time. His work of painting the Phillips opera house scenery will be finished next week and then he will begin work at the Grand. Mr. Bradley has given him the contract to paint the entire set of new scenery which will be of the finest and it is probable that he will get started on the work the last of next week” (page 1).
On Sept. 5, 1895, “The Richmond Item” reported, “The plasterers will soon be at work on the opera house. Scenic artist Tschudi has his scaffolding all arranged for painting the scenery for the Grand theatre” (page 4).
Tschudi was still in Richmond at the beginning of 1896. On Feb 26, 1896, “The Richmond Item” reported, “An Item reporter visited the room of Prof. Tschudi, the artist, this morning and took a hasty inspection of a number of his water-color paintings which are to be exhibited the remainder of the week. The collection represents about four years’ work, and some of the pictures re original while others are copies from celebrated paintings. Arranged as they will be at Stigleman’s studio, they certainly will be well worth the inspection of the people, whether they contemplate purchasing or not” (page 4).
In the same newspaper, Tschudi’s name popped up in a court case: “In ‘Squire Jessup’s court a judgement has been rendered against John U. Tschudi for $16 in favor of J. H. Dobbins. The suit was on account.” Whether this signaled a financial downturn or something else, Tschudi soon left town.
By summer, he was working in Lexington, Kentucky. On July 13, 1896, the “Lexington Herald-Leader” reported:
“Magnificent.
Will be Lexington’s Opera House this season.
Scenic artist Tschudi Now Hard at Work. How House will appear.
Everything is business and bustle at the Lexington Opera House, and when the coming theatrical season opens the citizens of Lexington will see one of the handsomest interior of a theatre in the country. Manager Scott will spare neither time or expense in refitting and refurbishing his house. The scenic artist, Mr. J. U. Tschudi, of Chicago, assisted by the old reliable John Uttinger, is already hard at work and has completed a number of handsome places. None of the old scenery will be used, but everything on the stage will be brand new. There will be sixteen new sets, all beautiful and fresh. The new drop curtain is going to be one of the very handsomest in the country, as Mr. Tschudi told a Leader reporter this morning that he was going to try his hand on this especial piece of work and make it guilt edge, so that our theatre goers can expect something beautiful. The work already completed by Mr. Tschudi is magnificent and shows him to be an artist of high rank. Redecorating the auditorium of the Opera House will be commenced at once, as the scaffold is now being erected for the frescoe painters” (page 5).
It was in Lexington, that Tschudi received what may have been the greatest publicity of his career. There were two extensive articles about Tschudi that I am sharing in their entirety. The first was published on Aug. 15, 1896, in “The Daily Leader” of Lexington, Kentucky (page 3). Again, not everything adds up.
“Mr. J. R. Tschudi who painted the New Opera House Drop Curtain.
An artist of some fame.
J. W. Tschudi, of Chicago, the famous scenic artist who has just completed the scenery and the magnificent drop curtain of out Opera House, was born in Switzerland (the land of William Tell) in 1852, and emigrated to America with his parents in 1857, and from childhood, was fond of painting and drawing. While at school he very often got punished for drawing cartoon on his slate, which kept the scholars laughing. After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ‘I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad. My father was a famous fresco artist (in relief); he studied under the old masters in France for ten years. His work can be seen in France, Italy, Switzerland and America at the present time. He died in his 69th year in 1886 in New York.’ Mr. Tschudi is an extensive traveler and had been to all the principal parts of the world. The Leader called on him at the Opera House yesterday, and was shown a beautiful collection of sketches and paintings from all parts of the globe. The artist’s works both in oil and water color, but the last three years there has been no sale for oil paintings, and he has devoted his time entirely to water colors. He says he will give the people of Lexington an exhibition of water color paintings at one of the prominent down-town stores. Mr. Tschudi has been frequently asked why he did not change the spelling of his name, so it would be easily pronounced. He simply answers; “I have no reason to be ashamed of it, as it is famous in Swiss history, being the name of one of the oldest royal families on record, and was borne by artists, generals and men of high rank, and at the present time there are a number of recognized artists in the family. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington until October painting twelve sets of scenery for the new Parkersburg W. Va., theater, which opens about the middle of that month” (page 3).
Another article published in Lexington’s “The Daily Leader” on Aug. 24, 1896, described Tschudi’s scenic art process. I am including the article in its entirety, as this is a wealth of information for future generations:
“Scenery,
And how it is painted by the Theatre Scenic Artist.
Mr. Tschudi Tells the Leader Some of its Mysteries.
Painting a drop curtain.
How the immense canvas is stretched for the work.
A scenic artist’s life a hard one at times.
Mixing paints in buckets.
Few people are acquainted with that part of theater commonly referred to a ‘back of the scenes,’ and fewer persons have a well-defined idea of how scenery for a modern playhouse is painted. A Leader man recently called upon Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who has been busily engaged in painting new scenery for the Lexington Opera House and who is now engaged in painting some for a theater soon to be opened in Parksburg, W. Va. Mr. Tschudi has remained in Lexington to do his work as the facilities here are the very best, and then he has become conveniently settled and likes Lexington. Mr. Tschudi’s drop curtain painted for the Lexington Opera House some weeks ago is certainly a thing of beauty, a masterpiece of scenic art, and has called forth expressions of extreme admiration from all who have seen it. Personally, Mr. Tschudi is a charming man to converse with, always interested in his work and ever ready and willing to impart that interest to others. To the question, ‘where were you born,’ put by the Leader man, Mr. Tschudi said, “I was born in Switzerland in 1852, but am an American artist. I came to the United States in 1857. My father was an artist in France and I, only one of eight children, am an artist. I was fond of it from childhood. When I was a boy, I sometimes got punished for drawing comic sketches on the walls, and I would neglect my lessons to draw those pictures and frequently get kept in school on that account.’
‘Tell me something, Mr. Tschudi about the scenic artist.’
‘The scenic artists,’ said he, ‘do not wear long hair and work with a palette and brushes as most people imagine. He is an ordinary looking man, pleasant in his conversation, and if you see him at work on the paint bridge, you will see him dressed in a neat suit of white overalls and jacket, surrounded by buckets, tomato cans, tin cups, etc. containing the various tints and colors and brushes, some of them as large as our whitewashers use Every large theatre, such as the one here in Lexington, which is well up to the average in modern equipment, is provided with a paint bridge and frame of enormous size. The paint bridge is built at the back wall of the stage, reaching from one fly gallery to the other, all the way from twenty to forty feet above the stage floor, according to the height of the stage, and ranges from four to six feet in width. Between the bridge and the wall there is a paint frame, reaching from one end of the bridge to the other and ranging from 20 by 30 to 40 by 60 feet. Looking at this frame you would think it impossible to move it because of its enormous size and weight, but when you hear the artist say, “Let’er down or up Charley (Charley is the artist’s helper or paint boy) you will see Charley go to the end of the bridge where there is a windlass, take hold with one hand or turn it and the frame is moved up or down as the artist wishes.
‘It may seem strange to you that this paint boy can with ease turn the crank and raise or lower the 40 by 60 feet frame which alone weighs half a ton without the scene that may be on it, also mounted as you see it when finished. However, it is very simple, this monster being hung precisely as a window sash is hung in your house. There is a counterweight attached that balances the frame, and instead of pushing it up like you would a sash, the paint boy turns the crank, and she goes up or down. So, you see, the artist stands on the stationary bridge and can paint a scene by 40 by 60 feet without having to climb up or down a scaffold as you may imagine on seeing some of the enormous scenes in large theaters in cities.
How the artist works.
‘Now, if you will follow, I’ll tell you how the artist works. Stretched on this frame here is, as you see, a canvas 24 by 30 feet, and ‘sized’ as the artist calls it. That is, ready to paint on. With this piece of charcoal tied to a stick, which, I suppose, is about five feet in length. He commences to sketch or outline a scene, which, by the way, is a puzzle to make out at first. Presently, after having mixed all of his colors in his buckets, cans, etc., you will see him apply the colors with large brushes, giving a slap and a dab of color here and there, and before you realize what he is trying to do, you will see the bright sunny sky, the distant hills, the rippling brook, the foliage of trees, and each appear and gradually grow as if by magic until there is a beautiful and finished landscape before you.
‘And all to aid the work of the players,’ suggested the Leader man.
‘Yes, indeed, without the scenic painter’s brush what would the play amount to? The scenic effects carry the principal productions of the present day, as you know.
‘Yes, it was pretty hard at times on the artist, still we had times when we were in not rushed, as some of the scenery which we called stock, such as wood scene, modern street, kitchen, prison, plain, chamber, garden and landscape could be used in some of the modern plays. Sometimes we would have it very easy for a week or two and then again it would be a case of rush.
Artist in a rush.
‘I remember one instance in particular, while getting up the scenery for the Coleen Bawn, there was a tremendous amount of all special scenery to get up. The play was to be put on Monday afternoon matinee. On Saturday night I found myself way behind with the work. The manager came to me, excited and said: ‘Mr. Tschudi, you have been with us for six years and always ready when the time came. By heaven, I am afraid you will not get through in time.’ I said, ‘I never mind, there is lots of time between now and 2 o’clock on Monday, and I will get here just the same.’ I went on the paint bridge Saturday evening after supper and never left until Monday at 11:30, when I had all the scenery finished. It was pronounced by the manager and public as being the grandest production of the Colleen Bawn that had ever been staged. It was pretty hard on me. I went to bed after dinner Monday and slept until Tuesday at 9 o’clock a.m. There are, however, more pleasant things in an artist’s life. Our work is not a burden, it is a life’s study and a pleasure, and I may say I love it. It is the artist who dazzles and deceives the eye and carries you imagination to every part of the globe. When you witness the grand spectacular production, for if you would take the scenic effects away it would be like taking the feathers from the peacock. The bird would be left, but its glory would be gone. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington several weeks while finishing up his work for the Parksburg theater. He may open a temporary studio in Lexington while here, where he will exhibit some of his studies in water colors. A display of his work can now be seen in the show windows of Brower, Scott & Frazee, and they have attracted considerable attention since being put there a few days ago.” (page 3).
By 1897, Tschudi was again listed in the Kansas City Directory, living with his family at 10 East 16th St. His son, also going by John Tschudi, was living with him. He and his son soon had embarked upon a new adventure, traveling with a new form of entertainment – Edison’s warograph. On Dec. 2, 1898, the “Keytesville Chariton Courier” of Keytsville, Missouri, reported, “The Messrs. Tschudi of the ‘War Graphic Co.’ exhibited their moving pictures at Dickenson’s hall, Tuesday evening. The entertainment was well attended, and the illustrations were both instructive and amusing” (page 8). For clarity, this was a moving picture show.
Two years later, Tschudi was still promoting the warograph. On Sept. 18, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” of Newton, Kansas, reported, J. U. Tschudi, with the warograph, who will give war pictures every night at some corner on Main street on a monster screen.”
On Oct. 2, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” went into detail about the attraction in an article entitled, “Warograph in Black Tent.” The article described:
“A very interesting attraction for this week will be the Warograph exhibition in the black tent. This exhibition presents life and action nearly all the battles fought in Cuba and the Phillipines. There you will see the charge of the Rough Riders, battle at San Juan Hill, Evacuation of Havana, Grand Parade of troops at Camp Alger, Destruction of Cevera’s fleet, the Kansas boys fighting before the trenches at Candabar and many other interesting scenes.” The article then quote the Hastings, Nebraska, Republican: “No attraction has commanded a greater patronage nor received more complimentary words than Edison’s Moving War Scenes. This feature of the carnivals has been a ‘hit’ and is certainly worthy of the good words and patronage it has been daily received. It is worth several times the price of admission charged and it is one of the attractive features at the Greater American Exposition at Omaha. The men conducting it are all affable and courteous gentlemen” (page 4).
On Oct. 3, 1899, “The Evening Kansas Republican” published a testimonial about Tschudi’s popular warograph attraction: “Don Kinney received a letter yesterday from E. D. Kipp, a friend of his in Marshal, Mo., who wrote from Fort Scott as follows: ‘I am here looking for attractions and find that your town and Fort Scott have the most of them. The Warograph, handled by J. H. Tschudi, is first class and I can highly recommend it” (page 1).
By 1900, the Tschudi family was living at 2631 Holmes. The household included John Ulrich Tschudi, Marguerite Tschudi, son John Tschudi, and daughter Lucy Tschudi. Their second daughter, Minnie Lillian was no longer part of the household, having married James Edward Brady in 1893. The Brady’s also lived in Kansas City.
Tschudi was still traveling with his warograph. On September 11 and 13, 1900, the “Sedalia Sentinel” of Sedalia, Kansas, published the following article:
“The Pictures are Here.
Splendid Scenes from the Boer War a feature.
Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who was here last year with the warograph pictures in the Ilgenfritz building on Ohio street, returns for the street fair again this year, with a much finer apparatus and a lot of new and interesting pictures, among which are fine views of the Boer war. His location is the leader building, opposite the court house on Ohio street. This is the best and cleanest show going for old and young, and the reputation Mr. Tschudi left last year insures him a splendid patronage. Open day and night” (page 1).
Tschudi traveled all over the country with his entertainment, yet still completed a variety of painting project. On Dec. 27, 1900, the “El Paso Herald” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, the scenic artist, arrived in the city with his wife this morning and will remain here until the carnival week. He has had a great deal of experience in decorating floats and his services can be secured by those who wish to put out floats and have not made arrangements” (page 5). He was in town for the live stock exhibit and parade the morning of the 18th].
By 1910, Tschudi had relocated to St. Louis, Missouri; his family remained in Kansas City. Tschudi now lived by himself, listed as an artist and residing at 726 S 2nd Street, St. Louis. The 1910 census report listed him as a widower. The same census report listed his wife as married.
Tschudi’s son and wife continue to live together on Holmes Street in Kansas City for the next two decades, although they moved from 2631 Holmes to 2751 Holmes. Tschudi’s son returned to using his adoptive name – John Fohrman. The 1910 Census listed Fohrman’s occupation as an artist in the Scenic Co. industry. He continued to work as a scenic artist until his passing, frequently working for the Kansas City Scenic Co. Nothing really changed for Fohrman or his mother until 1928. On October 13, 1928, Fohrman married Florence Lee Smith; Smith lived just down the street at 2709 Holmes. Marguerite continued to live with her son until 1931, when she passed. Her obituary made no mention of any former husband:
“TSCHUDI – Mrs. Marguerite Tschudi, 81 years old, died last night at the home of her son, John Fohrman, 2751 Holmes Street. Mrs. Tschudi was born in Luxemburg and came to Kansas City from Europe in 1885. Also surviving are a daughter, Mrs. Lucy Armbruster, wife of Benjamin G. Armbruster of the advertising department, Harris-Goar Company, who lives at 2711 Holmes street; a brother, John Merkes, Dubuque, Iowa and a sister, Mrs. Anna Miller, St. Louis.” It appears that Marguerite altered a little of her own history too– or it was an honest misprint.
After his mother’s passing in 1931, John and Florence Fohrman relocated west to California, settling in Los Angeles. In 1946, they moved to Culver City. Fohrman passed away on Jan 29, 1952. His obituary announced:
“John Joseph Fohrman Rites Set Tomorrow.
Services will be held tomorrow at 11 a.m. at the chapel of Smith & Salsbury for John Joseph Fohrman, 83, of 4208 Lafayette, who died Wednesday morning. He leaves his widow, Florence, and a daughter Lucia Fohrman. Born in Chicago, he had lived in Culver City for six years. He was a scenic artist. Rev. Eldred Charles, of the Cardiff Avenue Christian Church, will officiate. The remains will be cremated.”
In regard to the passing of his father, John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr.; Tschudi never left St. Louis. His career began to fade away, and his name no longer made headlines. Until his passing in 1921, Tschudi continued to work as an artist and live at South Second Street. His death certificate listed that he was 70 yrs. old, an artist, and a widower. Tschudi passed away at 614 N. 2nd in St. Louis, His death certificate listed his parents as John Tschudi and Margaretha Egli – both born in Switzerland. The informant listed on Tschudi’s death certificate was Wm Deven. A small note at the bottom indicates that he was buried in Kansas City. I have yet to locate his grave.
Seven years prior to Tschudi’s passing, he painted “Early Days on the Mississippi.” This may be his only extant painting, as I am unable to locate any other easel artworks by Tschudi;. “Early Days on the Mississippi” may be Tschudi’s sole artistic legacy; the only artwork that marks the life and career of John Ulrich Tschud, Jr.
However, it is the 1914 date and the Mississippi subject matter that is also significant.
In 1914, St. Louis commemorated the 150th anniversary of its founding; as part of the celebration, the City commissioned a two-part civic spectacle. The Pageant and Masque of Saint Louis was presented on the slop of Art Hill in Forest Park from May 28 to June 1, 1914. The pageant used an enormous stage built on pilings in the Grand Basin, measuring over 500 ft. wide and 200 ft. deep. The pageant featured a cast of 7500 volunteers. Some records suggest that there were 75,000 people in attendance on opening night. Three hundred years of local history were presented over the course of five hours, including many scenes from early years on the Mississippi River. Many historic photographs of this spectacle remain, depicting the incredible grandeur of the event. Some are digitally accessible through the St. Louis Public Library as part of the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis Collection.
I firmly believe that Tschudi’s painting was one of many, commissioned advertise the event; advertisements that depicted various scenes from the pageant. This is why the edges of Tschudi’s painting are hemmed, include a painted frame, and title. This artwork was intended to be tacked to a wall, as any advertisement. This painted composition was most likely part of a series depicting significant historical events reenacted at the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis in 1914.
I congratulate the Kimmswick Historical Society’s decision to invest in the preservation of Tschudi’s artwork for many future generations to come.
Sunday was my final day of work at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas. Over the course of seven days cleaned, repaired, consolidated loose paint, in painted, reinforced the seams, and replaced the entire top of the drop curtain with new fabric and batten. I also cleaned, consolidated loose painted, and repaired the matching grand border. Initially, this project was a pretty straightforward repair and touch-up job that was going to take five full days. However, it morphed into a “replace the entire top of the drop curtain and reinforce the seams.” It tacked on an extra two days to the project, so was my last chance to finish everything last night before I left town today. Concordia is a nine-hour drive from my home in Minnesota.
Constructed a PVC roller for the bottom of the drop; this will solely to help reposition the piece for hanging. An extremely thick layer of original primer and paint makes the composition extremely fragile and subject to cracking. All that was available was available for a quick roller was ten-foot sections of 4” PVC. We purchased four sections and five connectors. The last two connectors were added to the ends, as it lifts the tubes up, and the fabric is able to adjust during the rolling, preventing wrinkles that sometimes occur.
Roller to help shift drop curing hanging.Test run to make sure that roller would easily roll,
I positioned the assembled roller and did a dry run to make sure it would work. I wanted to verify that the paint didn’t crack when being wrapped around the diameter. Rolling would occur Monday morning, as it has been extremely humid and I wanted to make sure that everything was really dry.
My next task was to attach the new top batten, made by local theatre volunteer Royce. The battens were beautiful. As the drop is out of square, I referenced painted detail (bottom of the frame). Just as they used to attach battens: I started out with nailing the back of the batten to the stage floor. This keeps the boards straight and in position as I attached fabric. I was also able to work out a few warps this way too. Then I attached the top of the fabric to the back batten, stapling every six inches; no, there were no tacks available. I placed the front batten, sandwiching the fabric, with screws every foot, staggered. After everything was all set, I pried up the top batten and hammered over the nails. Voila! It was all set to go. The holes for suspension will be drilled when it is hung next Friday.
Attaching the back part of the batten.Complete top sandwich batten.
I then returned to both in-painting and paint consolidation on the drop curtain. I worked on the drop until there were too many wet areas and then shifted to the grand border – about 2PM. After cleaning the piece, I patched and replaced a missing grommet at the top. Then I was able to focus my attention on both the green drapes for the drop curtain and grand border.
New top batten on drop curtain and matching grand border curtain.
I finished up at 7PM and headed back to my hotel for the Board Meeting via. Zoom. I created a power point to show details of the work that occurred over the week and answered questions. The daily posts of this project were primarily for the Board of Directors to follow the progress, without stopping by during the day.
The Restored Napoleon Drop Curtain.View of matching grand border curtain and new trop of drop curtain.
This morning after checking out of my hotel, I stop by the theater, roll the drop, load up my supplies and head home. On my way home, I am stopping by the Blair Theatre in Bellville, Kansas to see their 1928 theater; Belleville is due north of Concordia.
The three horizontal seams on the Napoleon Drop Curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre were separating; the thread completely failing, leaving gaping holes in the painted composition. Each needed to be reinforced prior to hanging.
There are three seams on the Brown Grand Theatre Napoleon Drop Curtain.Damaged area on the seam.
Although this is not a common occurrence, I have encountered it before on historic scenery at Scottish Rite theaters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Pasadena, California.
My past work reinforcing the top, bottom, and vertical seams on a backdrop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.
In each case, the historic scenery was treated at least twice with flame retardants, possibly more. I have noticed that when some historic drops are re-treated with a secondary type of flame retardant, a chemical reaction occurs, causing the fabric to become stained and brittle. Not only will the fabric deteriorate, but the paint will actually begin to flake off. Such is the case with the Napoleon Drop Curtain.
Brown staining on the back of the Napoleon Drop Curtain from flame retardant, c. 1978-1979.Staining from multiple applications from flame retardants. Backdrop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite Theatre, c. 1902.Damaged area on the seam.Backdrop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite Theatre, c. 1902.
We know for certain that the Napoleon Drop Curtain was treated with a flame retardant as the back clearly states “Flame Proofed”– twice. It is possible that an overly strong solution was applied to begin with, or that a secondary application was added over the years. Some fire marshals will demand that historic scenery be treated ever few years; they have no idea that this will destroy historic scenes.
Flame Proofed stencil on the Napoleon Drop Curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas.
In regard to the failing seams on the Napoleon Drop Curtain, the only remedy is to reinforce them, thus preventing the further separation of the fabric panels. I reinforced one seam earlier this week as a test sample. This was to make sure that I could manipulate the drop, as well as verifying the strength of the glue and width of the necessary patch. Today I realized that all of the seams were different widths.
The narrowest areas of a seam on the Napoleon Drop Curtain measure 1/4″.The narrowest areas of a seam on the Napoleon Drop Curtain measure almost 1 1/2″.Reinforced seam. Note how the width of the seam varies beneath reinforcement strip.
There are two factors accelerating the overall deterioration of the painted surface on the Napoleon Drop Curtain: flame retardant and primer. The primary issue is that the pigment has begun to separate from the primer. Saturating areas with an extremely diluted hide glue has helped some. However, I have been hesitant to treat any areas that were not dusting. My hesitation stems from the overall thickness of the combined primer and paint layers. I have actually never encountered such a thick layer of dry pigment paint on an entire drop before, and the added weight to the fabric is quite something.
Paint that has flaked off of the Napoleon Drop Curtain, revealing the white prime coat beneath.
The weight makes the drop difficult to shift. This drop is incredibly heavy, and it has nothing to do with the actual fabric. The weight comes from the paint. This excess weight is also taking a toll on the fragile fabric. Typically, I am able to easily move a drop once it is on the stage floor. Keep in mind that the drop is on plastic, so it should easily slide in any direction that I want it to go; I just have to get a little air under the drop and it should readily move. The easiest way I can describe this process is playing with a parachute in gym class. Giving a little flip to the edge gets air under the fabric, lifts it up, and helps move the entire drop. When it is airborne, you guide the direction of where the drop will land. Usually, I can do this by myself with very little effort, but not the Napoleon drop curtain. It took two of use today to shift the drop.
After all three seams were reinforced on the Napoleon Drop Curtain.
The drop curtain was flipped face side down to reinforce the two remaining seams. This was not an easy task. When we flipped the drop face up again, I just about burst into tears. There were entirely new areas of damage to the painted composition. This time the damage was in vertical lines running down one area of the drop. I could not believe my eyes.For the life of me, I could not figure out why there was vertical damage, and not horizontal.
An example of vertical damage that occurred when flipping the drop. Notice previously stabilized horizontal cracks.Detail of damage that occurred after the Napoleon Drop Curtain was flipped painted side up.
There is that moment of stunned silence when I find myself at a loss. Then my brain goes into overtime, trying to process what has happened and what this means for the rest of the restoration and hanging process. I thought of all of the obstacles that will occur when it is hung from the pipe and raised. I needed to come up with a process to minimize any further damage during handling and hanging.
When I was patching four horizontal tears on the the backside of the drop, I noticed a vertical crease running though an entire fabric panel. At the time, I could not imagine was caused it. This flaw was original to the creation of the drop and not recent. It is now contributing to the paint separation, as are other areas with fabric flaws.
Flaw in the fabric on the back of the drop that I noticed while patching. This is one of the areas where a vertical line appeared when he drop was flipped over.Damage to the fabric near the flaw.
Here is my plan for today:
When the paint restoration is completed it will need to dry overnight. Despite the air conditioning, an abundance of rain this week has not helped lower humidity levels or dry time. Early Monday morning, I will roll the drop onto a tube. Due to limited time and supplies, I am forced to use fabric-wrapped PVC tubes. This in itself is incredibly tricky, as old drops seldom easily roll without creases. The new top batten will already be attached and ready to go. The idea is that the drop will be slowly unrolled as it is lifted; a time-consuming process, as it will need many hands gently unrolling the drop. Once suspended, and the lines leveled (hemp system), the bottom batten will be added. Attaching the bottom batten is pretty straight forward as the original lines are still visible. This is an original batten, by the way. The problem is that I will not be there for the actual hanging, scheduled next Friday.
How the drop responded during handling does not bode well for the overall longevity of this piece.
I was recently asked how long the restored drop could last. Considering the deteriorated fabric and flaking, I explained that it could possibly last for another forty, or even fifty, years. However, at some point it will need a backing piece, one that covers and supports everything. That is always a last resort and should be delayed as long as possible. The repairs to the back will cause a huge problem during the backing process. The added thickness and weight will also become problematic. After seeing the vertical lines today, I don’t know if it will last more than a few decades now, especially when I start factoring in the humidity and heat in Kansas. Temperatures on the stage greatly vary.
I have been restoring historic scenery for quite some time. There are always wildcards that you can’t anticipate, but this one is really unique. For a drop painted in 1978, this should be in much better shape. There is just so much paint on the fabric. The seams will hold, but it is impossible to determine when the actual fabric will give way. I say this, having handled drops three times the age of this one, with absolute confidence that they had several decades left in them.
The thickness of a paint layer ultimately determines the lifetime of a backdrop. The seaming matters too. Over time, I have noticed that vertical seams support the weight of bottom battens better than horizontal seams.
On September 17, 2021, I was interviewed by Tony at KNCK Radio. He asked a variety of questions my current scenery restoration project at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas. Here is the link to the interview:
I have never encountered random patching on a historic backdrop. Patches are usually placed with a purpose; to repair some sort of damage to the fabric. The Napoleon drop curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas, has dozens of patches that range from approximately 1” x 1” to 3” x 8”. Only a handful of these patches cover damaged fabric. The placement of the rest remain a mystery.
The Napoleon Drop Curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas.Random patches on the back of the Napoleon Drop Curtain.Detail of patches on the Napoleon Drop Curtain.
Initially, I surmised that an enthusiastic individual came up with a solution to prevent light spill, covering thin areas with a patch, but now I am beginning to wonder. Today, I had to remove a few of those patches along a horizontal seam for reinforcement. There was nothing odd about the fabric beneath the patch.
Patch covering seam that needs a reinforcement strip.Removing patch to place reinforcement strip – no damage below.
As I removed each patch, I was surprised to find no thinning fabric or apparent damage beneath. This was very perplexing, and I started to take a closer look at the actual patches, the glue, and placement. Here is an example of another patch that I removed to prepare the area of a reinforcement strip.
Removing patch to place reinforcement strip.Removing patch to place reinforcement strip – no damage below.Removing patch to place reinforcement strip – no damage below.Removing patch to place reinforcement strip – no damage below.Removing patch to place reinforcement strip – no damage below.There is only glue residue along the bottom edge where the patch used to be.
It was apparent that the patches were placed while hanging, just based on glue drips alone. Glue saturated the drop, and a variety of muslin patches were pressed into place. Not all patches were well cut or placed. This haphazard process not only cracked the paint, but also left some staining on the front when the glue seeped through.
Here are my observations:
Multiple hands cut the patches. Some had perfectly frayed edges, with all of the thread removed. Others had wadded up bunches of thread in the corners. A few patches were even cut with pinking shears. I could not help but think of the individual who was was actively working to prevent frayed edges.
Multiple individuals slathered glue on the area to be patched. Some used an abundance of glue to the point that there is more glue on the surrounding fabric than under the patch. In some cases, so much glue was added that it dripped down like tree sap.
Glue drips that indicate the patching was done while the drop was hanging.
Quality greatly varies in placement. There are so many examples where one can say “not like this.”
Here are a few examples of what not to do when patching a drop:
1. The glue goes on the patch first, not the drop; it never goes on both. The reason for this is to prevent the glue from seeping through to the painted surface.
Too much glue used for each patch. This will affect the front (painted composition).Notice the two squares that are darker. This is the staining from the patches pictured in the image above.
2. Do not place one patch over another; it’s pointless.
Overlapping patches are unnecessary.
3. Fray the edges of each patch, do not use pinking shears. This helps secure the edge of the patch.
Patch cut with pinking shears.
4. Smooth down the frayed edges of each patch. This helps secure the edge of the patch.
A patch where the edges were not smoothed down during application.A patch where the edges were not smoothed down during application.
5. Smooth down each patch and don’t forget to remove wadded up threads attached to the patch. This helps secure the edge of the patch.
Wadded up threads from fraying edges of the patch were not removed, just glued in place.
Here is how to place a reinforcement patch on a seam:
Back to the project…Reinforcing a seam is a pain. Ideally, I use one long strip. However, this could not be the case with this project, as the original seams were very poorly done. Typically, I press open up the seam, and place prepared patch. Keep in mind that the patch is to prevent the seam from pulling apart; evenly supporting the weight. I reinforce seams when the thread begins to fail. A thread that fails is often the subject of flame retardant. In some areas, the seam on the Napoleon Drop Curtain would not lay flat, as it was uneven. That meant slowly making my way across the drop with 3’-0” lengths.
There were flaws in the original seam throughout. This causes great difficulty, as the reinforcement strip will not lie flat in that area.Preparing the reinforcement patch.Placing the reinforcement patches on plastic near the seam.Hide glue is used to prepare the reinforcement patch. Glue and brush are placed on an industrial sized cooking sheet to prevent spilling, while flattening down the seam as the work progresses.Reinforcement patch in an area where the seam was sewn correctly, and flat.
In addition to reinforcing one of the three horizontal seams, I finished securing the painted patch at the top. I still have a little paint touch up, but it seems good to go for the new top batten. There is just a little more painting to go.
The top patch was fully secured yesterday, with only a little detail painting to go.
The wild card of my project at the Brown Grand Theatre is replacing the top of the drop curtain. It is a long process, that requires several steps and several days of dry time.
This portion of the project all stemmed from a horizontal rip that began along the top batten years ago.
What should have happened when this damage was initially identified, was a simple patch. In other words, remove the top batten, repair the fabric, replace the top batten, and rehang; problem solved. Instead, the old four-inch pine batten was replaced and a new six-inch oak batten, placed well below the original damage. The excess fabric was then wrapped around the backside of the batten. Even this repair may have been reversible, except the excess fabric was glued to the batten.
Original damage from batten (bottom rip) and damage from top batten (top rip).
Furthermore, the new top batten was not adequately prepared prior to use. Specifically, the sharp edges were not rounded, shaved, or sanded, so another rip began to appear in the same location as the previous one. On top of everything else, the glue used to secure the excess fabric was solvent-based, so it continued to off-gas after the new oak batten was attached. A chemical reaction occurred that rapidly deteriorated the fibers and irreparably damaged the top of the drop. This meant that the top twelve excess inches wrapped around the oak batten became damaged beyond repair; they could no longer support the weight of the drop. A simple reinforcement strip along the top was no longer an option. The damaged excess fabric needed to be removed and the new top edge would be “sandwiched” between two reinforcement strips for adequate support.
Solvent-based gluewas used when new batten was attached to the top.
Although this seems like a complex repair, the biggest problem is dry time. Each step requires a good day for the glue to dry. The drying goes slow because the patch needs to be compressed for a secure seal. This is not like the application of a normal patch to a puncture where you lightly press and walk away. I am using hide glue for this repair.
Hide glue granules before adding water and heating.Hide glue used for repairs.
Three days ago, I glued the fabric extension to the backside, creating the back patch. While this dried, I prepared a painted front patch. By yesterday afternoon, I had managed to secure the painted front patch to the edge of the top, as I could not glue the entire patch at once due to size. Today, I will continue to attach the remainder of the front patch.
Back strip that is placed below damage. This combined with front patch will “sandwich” the old fabric.Pre-painting top patch.Completed top patch and secured back patch.First step in gluing top patch, successfully encapsulating the original fabric.
In addition to the top patch, I will also need to reinforce all of the seams. This will be the most difficult repair in the entire project. It is time-consuming and tricky. There were four panels of fabric sewn together when the drop was constructed. The three horizontal seams have begun to fail, so this will require a reinforcement strip that runs the entire length of each seam.
While all of this is happening, I continue to work on consolidating loose paint and addressing areas with paint loss during dry time.
I am currently in Concordia, Kansas, working on a scenery restoration project at the Brown Grand Theatre.
I returned to the theater yesterday morning to discover bat guano scattered across my clean drop. This was something that I did not anticipate and added a layer of annoyance. It would not be a one-time issue.
My recent encounter with bats makes me leery of them now. I am sharing this story, as it taints my view of bats at the Brown Grand. My first “residential bat” experience occurred last month. It was when Jenny Knott visited my studio and helped document my restoration process. Keep in mind that my studio is in the woods and for the past eighteen years bats have never been a problem. That being said, I had never been in close proximately to a bat in any house. There is nothing quite like waking up to a bat that is repeatedly slamming itself into your screen window and then erratically flying around the room.
I did not run screaming from the room, but immediately panicked and hid under the covers. I would have stayed there until the morning if it hadn’t been ungodly hot at the time. Jenny and I dealt with it, eventually directing the winged critter into another bedroom at 2am in the morning. I had always thought that I would handle a bat encounter better, with calm determination as I vanquished the unwelcome invader from my home. I was wrong. I think the majority of my fear stems from the unpredictability of their flight pattern.
Anyway, after cleaning the droppings from the drop, I proceeded with my plan for the day. By the way, don’t worry, I am fully masked and gloved for this project anyway. I continued addressing the minimal cracks and paint loss throughout the painted composition. As I scooted along on a piece a plastic, I explored the varieties of the painted surface and actual colors. First of all, the drop had been touched up by a well-meaning individual at some point, but there was also a slight sheen to some of the original colors. I surmised that the reflective quality was result of two different things: the strength of original size (glue) in the paint and a later sealant added to some areas.
The main colors affected were all greens. Most of the painted green draperies will not reactivate with water. I have never encountered this problem with a strictly dry pigment and diluted hide glue (size water) mixture. This suggest that a premix paint was added to the dry pigment/size water medium. This means that an additional binder is added to the mix, and the paint will remain fixed.
Also, the malachite green (in the shadow areas of the drape) is the most reflective of the colors, but these dark colors are definitely composed of dry pigment and will reactivate. Some dark dry pigments are notorious for dusting, even upon initial application. They require a stronger size water than normal. However, you have to make sure that there is not too much glue in the size water or it dries shiny. That is possibly what happened here.
The light greens are also a problem, as they do not reactivate with water at all; suggesting that premixed paint was added to the mixture upon application. I suspect that it was the same white paint used to prime the drop. The white primer does not reactivate when water is introduced either. This is problematic and contributes to the overall flaking and dusting of colors. The dry pigment paint mixture never fulled bonded to the primer.
This same pre-mixed white paint was likely added to lighten the green drapery colors. I have explored the addition of premix to dry pigment mixtures in the past to analyze the final finish. White dry pigment is a wild card. It can lighten a color an unbelievably amount when only a little bit is added to the mix. This makes mixing light colors extremely tricky and why I always try to lighten color with another color of a lighter value instead of white. A premixed white paint (casein, latex, acrylic) will lighten colors at a different rate and remain more predictable. It is never an option when restoring an historic drop.
In addition to the color issues, there is also a sealant problem. At some point, a sealant was applied a few areas; the brushwork is very identifiable. Overtime, the sealant darkened and remains fixed. My guess is that the composition was dusting, and someone tried to consolidate the loose colors.
The dark shiny sealant in the cracks has dimension, like tree sap.
In addition to repairing minor paint damage, I also continued to work on the top of the drop. The entire top section was removed, damaged beyond repair from a solvent-based glue that was applied when the top sandwich batten was replaced. Yesterday, I prepared, placed, sized and base-coated the top patch. This will be applied to the frontside of the patch placed yesterday.
Preparing the top patch. This is just a base coat on the green; colors will be finished after patch is attached.
Finally, the new top battens were delivered by a volunteer, and they look absolutely beautiful!
New wood battens for top of drop. The Napoleon Drop Curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas.
I am currently in Concordia, Kansas, working on a scenery restoration project. With a population of approximately 5,000, this town is located in central Kansas; an area known as the Smoky Hills region of the great plains.
My project is to repair and restore the second drop curtain delivered to the Brown Grand Theatre in 1979; a painted replica based on the original one delivered by the Twin City Scenic Co. in 1907.
The painted composition is extremely deteriorated, with some of the problems stemming from overly thick layers of primer and dry pigment paint.
In my humble opinion, the key to a painted scene’s longevity is making sure that the painting remains flexible. This applies to any historic setting, whether it was painted with thin glazes (as in the English tradition) or opaque washes (as in the European tradition). The primer and the paint layer can never be too thick, even when a translucent area is back painted. I believe that it is a lot easier to accomplish this objective with dry pigments and diluted hide glue than with premixed paints. Dry pigment colors can maintain their vibrancy even after a ridiculous amount of size water is used, yet still sit on top of the previously applied color, maintaining an opacity unparalleled with premixed paints.
So, why is a thick layer on the surface of a drop curtain a problem? A thick primer and/or paint application means that it is drop becomes subject to cracking, flaking and dusting down the road, especially when handled a lot.
Cracking, flaking and dusting on the Grand Brown Drop Curtain. Photograph from September 14, 2021.
Normally this would not be a big problem for a permanent installation; such is the case with most drop curtains in historic theaters, as the drops stay on a dedicated line set and are never moved. However, the Brown Grand drop curtain has been handled excessively over the past decade. It has been lowered to the stage floor at least three times since its installation in 1979. The drop was lowered to the stage floor when the top sandwich batten was replaced, swapping the original 4-inch wide pine for 6-inch wide oak. It was lowered when the rigging was recently replaced too. I have to wonder if the rigging crew allowed the drop to accordion to the floor, as with some modern drops. There are tell-tale horizontal creases that suggest that method. It was lowered a final time just prior to my arrival this week. The lowering and raising process takes a toll on a thickly painted compositions, resulting in an abundance of creasing and abrasions. These weaknesses accelerate the aging of the scene if left untreated and eventually becomes irreparable.
Cracks on the surface, revealing both white primer and raw fabric.
I noticed that many areas of paint loss on the Napoleon drop revealed a white prime coat beneath, and the white paint had a slight sheen to it. This may be that too much size was added to the whiting during initial application – or that another paint product was used. However, there is not a good bond between the primer and paint. In other areas, the prime coat has completely detached from the fabric, revealing raw fibers below. In addition to cracking, flaking, and dusting pigment, there is a substantial amount of surface contaminants. Removing the top layer of dirt has been tricky, but I went color by color, determining which colors would need extra attention during consolidation.
N95 mask, gloves and Absorene sponges used for cleaning the drop curtain.
After cleaning the drop, I addressed areas with minimal cracking and paint loss. Using a damp brush, loose color can quickly conceal the damage and fill the void. I say, “easily,” but this is really a tricky process that has taken me quite a few years to fine tune. First of all, not all of colors will work, especially if any pre-mixed paint was added to the dry pigment colors. Secondly, this method only works for small cracks, not large areas of paint loss. It is important to remember that you have one shot to get it right, and a very limited window of time to shift the paint. For this Brown Grand drop curtain, I could successfully shift some yellows, browns, reds, sienna, dark blue and black (yes, there is black on this one, not Van Dyke). The greens are immovable, suggesting that something else is going on and another type of paint may have been applied at the onset.
Shifted the dusting color with a damp brush to fill in the cracks.
This whole approach takes a great amount of skill and years of practice. If you do it wrong or overwork an area, you can actually remove the color and further damage the composition. Light colors are incredibly tricky, including skies, as a tide line will also appear if your brush is too wet. However, this process does not introduce any new color to the composition. That being said, there will still have to be a significant amount of in-painting for this project.
My second task yesterday was preparing the top of the drop for a fabric reinforcement. Twelve-inches of the top of the scene had to be removed, as off-gassing from a solvent-based glue used while replacing the original top batten had irreparably damaged the fabric. Using hide glue, two long patches were secured to the backside, four inches below the new top. It will remain under weights for twenty-four hours, and then I will continue with that particular project later today. This was not part of the planned project, so we had to scramble for materials. This included a quick shopping trip in Salina, Kansas.
Adding a four-inch strip across the top of the drop for reinforcement.
By the way, this is a solo project. I am not using any assistants or volunteers for the restoration. Much has to do with the increased Delta variant in this region. We just lost a close family friend to COVID in the area a few weeks ago.
If it weren’t for the potential health risks for all involved, this would be a fantastic teaching opportunity. Regardless, I am tried to document my process and share daily updates with all stakeholders. This is the best way to communicate without having people stop by and check in on my progress.
Painted detail showing horizontal cracking, caused during handling when the drop was creased.
In 2002, I was hired by the Brown Grand Theatre to restore three backdrops: a Garden Scene, Woods Scene and Rocky Pass. Each backdrop was a victim of severe water damage. At the time, the venue still had its original hemp system and paint bridge. There were no counterweights of any kind; no sandbags to ease a stagehand’s burden, just three ropes. I remember trying to lift one of the scenes and just dangling, but I was a lot lighter then so it could have been just me. The Brown Grand Theatre project was one of many during the summer of 2002. I was also restoring historic scenery collections at Scottish Rite theaters in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Santa Fe, New Mexico. That summer, I was overwhelmed with projects, and completed the Brown restoration on my way home from Santa Fe. The Brown Grand stage house was absolutely captivating, but I did not have any time to adequately document the paint bridge, rigging, or many other intriguing details.
The Brown Grand Theatre, August 2002. Note the steps leading to the fly rail, stage right.
I returned to the Brown Grand Theatre in 2009. This time, my project was to remove and minimize the staining from tar drips; collateral damage during a roof repair. It was a quick job, completed after another large restoration project, this one at the Scottish Rite in McAlester, Oklahoma. Again, my stay at the theater was very brief within no time to document any other stage artifacts, the rigging or paint bridge. I will always regret not stopping to snap a few images.
Last year, I was again contacted by the Brown Grand about some damage to their scenery. The general manager explained that the front curtain was in desperate need of repair. This really surprised me, as it was a painted replica from 1979. In the 1970s, the original drop curtain was replaced after it was deemed irreparable. I was extremely familiar with the replica, as well as the original and couldn’t image what caused the rapid deterioration.
The Brown Grand Theatre, July 2021.
The project was granted-based work, so we waited for approval. The timeline remained fluid, as I was unwilling to schedule prior to the vaccine roll out. We decided tentatively for the fall of 2021 – late September. I really wanted to be fully vaccinated before I started planning restoration projects again and coming in close contact with people that I didn’t know. All this time, I was basing the project timeline on a few current pictures and memory. I added that until I saw it in person it had to remain a “guesstimate,” so in July I swung by the theatre. I was on my way home from Colorado with Michael Powers after meeting the New York Times reporter in Leadville.
I was not prepared for the transformation that had occurred to the Brown Grand stagehouse since my last visit.
The expanded fly floor and the new pin rail at the Brown Grand Theatre, July 2021.Looking up at the new fly floor at the Brown Grand Theatre in July 2021. Notice the placement of the sandbags in relation to the fly floor; they don’t clear.The new paint bridge at the Brown Grand Theatre, July 2021.
All of the details that I never had time to photograph were gone. An entirely new rigging system, fly floor and paint bridge had been installed. I was devastated, woefully disappointed with the new version; it also worked less well than the old system. Regardless of my disappointment, I assessed the damaged drop. The majority of the damage was caused by good intentions and amateur repairs. We could not fully lower the drop to the floor, as the paint was quite thick, and we would need multiple hands on deck. However, I got a good sense of the condition. I also suggested that they lower the grand border for my return, so that I could address some of the damage to that too.
At some point an enthusiastic individual came up with a solution to prevent light spill through the thin areas of fabric on the drop curtain. Instead of placing a curtain behind it to block the light spill, dozens of patches were glued to the back. It had been patched while hanging too, with a substantial amount of glue. The actual application of the patches not only cracked the paint, but also left some staining throughout.
Patches added to the back of the drop curtain to prevent light spill. This is not a good solution for this issue.Ever.All of the patches used an abundance of glue and were placed when hanging.This, in turn, stained come of the painted composition.Patches on the back of the drop curtain at the Brown Grand Theatre.
As I discussed options, we decided to leave the patches on, since removing them would likely cause more damage than just touching up the front. The “plan” was for me to arrive on a Monday and depart on a Saturday. The project was to conceal areas of paint loss and staining, as well as patch new damage (rips and punctures). There was also another tar drop to deal with – same place. Prior to my arrival, they would lower the drop and then raise it after my departure. Both top and bottom battens would remain on during the repairs. I would arrive on a Sunday, work Monday through Friday, and depart on Saturday morning. On my first day, however, I would verify the work for a week and do a zoom presentation to the Board of Directors. This would be an opportunity to immediately address any surprises. Before my departure at the end of the week, I would make another presentation to the Board about my completed work. I reserved two additional days for unanticipated work, or damage that occurred when the curtain was initially lowered to the stage.
The drop curtain and grand border on the stage of the Brown Grand Theatre, September 2021.
Upon my arrival yesterday, I was able to fully inspect the entire drop curtain and grand border. I was not prepared for the “improvements” made to the top and bottom sandwich battens since my last visit in 2009.
I’ll start with Surprise #1 today: The 4” top pine batten of the drop curtain was completely replaced with a 6” oak batten. It wasn’t just replaced; the drop was shortened when they place the new boards below older damage at the top. Therefore, the top 12” were wrapped around the batten, all the way to the backside. Prior to wrapping the drop around the oak, a piece of muslin was glued to the wood with a solvent-based product and assembled quickly. This glue seeped through the base layer of muslin to the surface. The glue then proceeded to off gas, causing the painted fabric to rapidly deteriorate. Like tissue paper, any pressure to remove it from the glued areas caused it to disintegrate. I was successful in removing some of the fabric, but not the majority of it. The top 1′-0″ of the drop is not usable and damaged beyond repair. It and will have to be removed, as it cannot support weight or be salvaged. Fortunately, the timing is lucky, as I doubt the drop would have lasted the season.
Oak sandwich batten added to the top of the Brown Grand Theatre drop curtain.The back of the sandwich batten (6″ oak) that is still firmly attached to the top of the drop.The top of the drop showing old damage and recent damage from the oak batten.
The bottom batten was only altered on the ends. Again, oak was added to the ends of the original sandwich batten. In both cases, the sharp edges of the oak damaged the nearby fabric.
Oak pieces added to the original bottom batten.
These issues will be address next weekend. For now, I begin the process of cleaning, repairing and paint touch up.