Southern States Trips – Page 4

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar: The Drop Curtains of Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina

Many theaters forget their past. Fire, hurricanes, tornados or renovations can destroy artifacts that were never documented in the first place. Painted scenes and machinery are removed, stored, or disposed of at some point and then forgotten. When considering the amount of change that happened to Thalian Hall over the past 150 years, one has to believe that this drop curtain keeps reappearing for a purpose.

The original 1858 drop curtain painted by Russell Smith pictured in 1947.

Changes made to the theater since it opening in 1858 were documented in a paper, written and compiled by Isabelle M. Williams in 1976. There is also a wonderful book and numerous articles written by D. Anthony Rivenbark about the theater. Much of the information below is from the research of these two authors.

In 1858, Russell Smith received $200 for the drop curtain, a bill paid by five businessmen in Wilmington, North Carolina.

The 1858 drop curtain by Russell Smith now hangings in the lobby of Thalian Hall.

In her paper, Williams notes that major revisions to the theater took place at Thalian Hall in 1867-9, 1881, 1900, 1904, 1909 and 1938. She wrote, “It was remarkable that Thalian Hall has endured it all …” The renovations made over the decades were substantial, but it was the continuing delivery of scenery to the venue that really intrigues me the most.

In 1858, the original proscenium was described as 30 feet high and a little less in width, with a stage area measuring 42 feet by 57 feet. It is believed that the original width of the proscenium was actually 28’ wide by 22’ high, making the drop curtain’s 29’w x 23’h measurements noted on the preliminary drop curtain sketch reasonable.

At the time of installation, it was common for a theater to include a painted grand border; this often occupied the top third of the proscenium opening. A painted grand border and painted side tormentors reduced the proscenium opening for a much more intimate staging. However, if the painted grand border, torms, and drop curtain were removed, the large proscenium opening could accommodate other forms of entertainment, such as aerial acts.

The current remnant of Smith’s original drop curtain was constructed with vertical seams, very similar to the backdrops manufactured at the Sosman & Landis studio in Chicago. The drop curtain panels measure between 26” and 27” wide. There are eleven full panel sections and two partial panel sections, in addition to the two fabric extensions that were added to each side at a later date. The total width of original painted fabric that still remains is approximately 27’ wide. The original edges of the drop, complete with leather rings rope guides, were retained and shifted; with a fabric insert in between the final panel, cut in half to extend the overall width of the drop curtain.

The original curtain (left) and fabric insert (right).

Williams further writes that by 1900, the “curtains” surrounding the drop curtain were replaced, as plans called for a new proscenium and grand drapery. At the time, the term “curtains” often noted painted pieces, while “drapery” described hung fabric that was not painted. It is likely that the original painted tormentors were replaced with actual draperies, thus necessitating the original drop curtain to be enlarged. Also, the Thalian Hall stage was altered “to give more room for scenery.”

There was also another drop curtain installed at Thalian Hall by William F. Hamilton. On October 10, 1899, “The Dispatch” reported, “Mr. A Schloss, the lessee of the Opera House has closed the contract for a new drop curtain for the Opera House. It will be painted by Mr. W. F. Hamilton of the Star Theatre of New York City. William F. Hamilton is the same scenic artist who I have previously written about; the one who partnered with Thomas G. Moses and formed Moses & Hamilton in 1900. The studio produced scenery for opera, Broadway and Coney Island from 1900-1904. Moses & Hamilton set up their new studio at Proctor’s 125^th Street Theatre, a variety theatre in New York City that included a scene room. They also rented paint frames at two other theaters. When their partnership ended, Moses returned to Sosman & Landis while Hamilton stayed in New York.

Hamilton was no stranger to Wilmington. In 1896, The “Wilmington Morning Star” reported, “Mr. F. C. Peckham, of New York, assistant to Mr. W. F. Hamilton, scenic artist and stage manager of the Standard Theatre, arrived in the city yesterday and will commence work on the scenery and a new drop curtain at the Opera House (Wilmington, NC, 26 August, 1896, page 1). It was not uncommon for a venue to include more than one drop curtain; a front drop curtain (landscape composition surrounded by ornamental frame and painted fabric surround), an advertisement curtain (sponsored by local businesses), and an olio curtain (for entr’acte pieces, such as short musical numbers between melodramatic acts); these would all be termed “drop curtains” to accompany the remained of painted settings. Drop curtains could also indicate painted backings, what we consider backdrops now.

J. Constantine provided another drop curtain and two scenes. Constatine was from the Grand Opera House in New York in 1900. The constant trickle of scenery into the theater is not unusual at all. Unfortunately, we do not know the exact compositions for any of the drop curtains painted besides that of Russell Smith. Consantine’s two additional settings, however, were described somewhat. The new scenery included an interior parlor setting with fourteen pieces and a street scene with borders (Star, May 8, 1900, page 13). I interpret this description to mean that the interior parlor scene included fourteen interchangeable flats that were lashed together, a standard interior box set for the time. The street scene included a backdrop, wings, and sky borders. That year, the stage was also remodeled to make room for the additional scenery, necessitating the purchase of new stage machinery at an expense of $740.

By 1904, there was a mention about a change in the proscenium, with the stage being enlarged by 10 feet. This did not include the proscenium opening, just the actual backstage area.

The original Russell Smith drop curtain was finally taken down and stored in the attic when a new front drop curtain arrived from New York City in 1909. The proscenium opening was not listed in Julius Cahn’s Official Theatrical Guide as being 35’ wide. A renovation of this sort, often demands new scenery or the refurbishment and expansion of existing scenery. The well-known Russell Smith curtain could have been enlarged and hung for sentimental purposes on an upstage line, or simply stored and replaced; it is not clear of the exact inventory and line sets at this time. Something prompted the removal of the curtain after the renovation in 1909.

By 1932, however, the original drop curtain was discovered in a storage room of Public Library. Smith’s work again appeared on stage in 1938 when it was hung for a brief period of time before returning to storage. At this point, records indicate that it was stored on the stage and subsequently damaged, with the top third being destroyed. Some accounts note that wheelbarrows were rolled across the top while it was on the floor, causing the damage. And the drop disappeared again before rediscovery a few decades ago.

It is astounding that this curtain survives at all, let alone is still hanging at all in the original building.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar: Alterations to Russell Smith’s 1858 Drop Curtain at Thalian Hall

According to Virginia Lewis in her book “Russell Smith, Romantic Realist, “ in 1872, the artist Russell Smith painted a replica of an earlier work. In 1857 Smith created the entr’acte drop curtain for the Academy of Music in Baltimore, Maryland. This replica composition was described in the “Baltimore Sun” during 1907. That year, the article reported, “a curtain, painted by the late Russell Smith, famous the world over as a curtain painting artist, has just been hung. The curtain, painted more than a quarter of a century ago, has been retouched around the borders so that it will harmonize with the decorations of the proscenium arch.” In other words, they added colors to unify the old painting with the new interior décor.

This parallels what happened to the 1858 drop curtain at Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina. The Smith curtain was enlarged and altered at some point. I studied the additions and alterations over the course of a few hours while sitting in the Thalian Hall lobby on April 23, 2019.

What initially struck me was the addition of black paint. The reason for my surprise is that black is seldom used in 19^th century and early 20^th scene painting, unless it is for lettering on an advertisement curtain. The darkest color is typically Van Dyke Brown, especially for shadow areas and it reflects light better than black. For the Smith curtain in Wilmington, opaque black shadow lines were added by a second artist well after the original composition was painted. The black was added to the painted ornament on the frame, the center medallion and the statue on the right side of the composition. However, black was not the only new paint introduced to the original painting, as both a red glaze and green glaze were added to the frame. These two colors were likely an attempt to “harmonize” the drop with the decorations of the proscenium arch, similar to what happened at the Academy of Music in Baltimore when Smith’s curtain was rehung in 1907.

In regard to the Thalian Hall drop curtain, the center medallion was repainted in a style inconsistent with the remainder of the composition; specifically, the portrait and lettering are of an inferior quality. The inferior brushwork not only applies to the actual features Thalia, but also the lettering of “Thalia.” For both, the painting style is much more rudimentary than the remainder of the work, especially the quality of the lettering. The lettering “Thalia” is not centered and even touches the bottom of the portrait. Furthermore, the font is muddy and the brushstrokes unrefined.

There is also the problem with the use of black for background for the portrait that dominates the entire composition. The black immediately draws focus from the rest of the composition. It is likely that the second, and currently artist, recognized his mistake as soon as he stepped back from his work. I always hate to presume what an artist was thinking when creating a painting; we cannot know what was going on in another’s mind during the time of artist creation. However, here is my hypothesis, as I too have unwittingly placed myself in a similar position. After adding a detail that was too dark for the painting, you panic a bit, and think “Oops! Well, I’ll just add a little more of that same color here, and here, to make it look like as if it belongs.” This is always mistake, as a once small inconsistency grows into a substantially larger problem.

In an attempt to unify the work, the artist took the same black color from the medallion and added little touches here and there throughout the lower third of the painting to make it seem like it was part of the original color scheme. Unfortunately, the artist did not have the same ‘hand” as Smith. It is his inferior technique that gives away the over painting in addition to the color. The artist who added the black lines did not use a straight edge to draw the straight black lines. The remainder of the composition clearly shows that all of the straight lines were painted while using a straight edge. Without a straight edge, the lines waiver and suggest an artist’s inexperience; this still happens in scenic art today too.

Example of a black line added by a later artist to the Russell Smith drop curtain at the Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina.

The lettering of Thalia is inconsistent wit the remainder of the painting.

The flat black added to the statue obliterates the original shadow shapes an is inconsistent with the remainder of the composition.

The same can be said for the shadowing of the other ornamentation along the border where black is applied. The little “U” shadows placed at the bottom are also inconsistent and sporadic, unlike the remainder of the original shadow work in deep brown and sienna glazes. The black also reads as opaque, unlike the remainder of the painted ornament around the frame. Smith’s style harkens back to the English tradition of glazing. The center medallion and black accents are opaque and inconsistent with this tradition.

In addition to the over painting, the width of the entire curtain was extended and the bottom border was repainted to match the new décor, just as the case with the Academy of Music in Baltimore during 1907. In Wilmington, the fabric extensions on either side of the drop were painted in a reddish hue, likely to match the new décor. This same color was also added to the ornamental frame surrounding the landscape composition, placed as an accent on the original white and gold frame. In addition to red, green was added at the bottom. You can see that the frame was originally white with gold trim; the golden shapes being defined with yellow, ochre, burnt sienna, umber and a bit of Van Dyke brown. The red is placed as a glaze over some of the detail; effectively obliterating the dimension and making it area appear flat. The also glaze extends onto the fabric extension, which is how we know it is not original to the composition. The same can be said for the green glaze; the color again obliterates some of the detail.

It would be wonderful to see the drop as it looked when originally painted by Smith, without the black, red and green additions; they all detract from the soft atmospheric effect of the composition. In particular, without the later red accents, the small touches of that same color in the clothing of the figures would have jumped out, making the scene come alive with splashes of brilliant colors.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar: The Russell Smith Curtain, April 23, 2019

I spent much of yesterday examining a drop curtain painted by William Thompson Russell Smith (1812-1896) in 1858. At the time of installation, a local newspaper placed his work alongside that of other scenic artists whose work hung in many prominent New York theaters.

The Russell Smith curtain hanging at Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina

On October 7, 1858, the “Daily Herald” in Wilmington, North Carolina, reported, “There are many theatres there [New York], but none which possesses even a decent drop curtain as a work of art. Take the great Lyric Temple on Fourteenth Street, what have we there? A large masse of elaborate drawing, a pile of impossible architecture, devoid of the poetry and charm of color, and feeble in light and shade. Again at Burton’s there is an extensive canvass, the subject the town of Miessen, Saxony, celebrated for the clay which forms the world famous Dresden china, treated in a tame and common place style. At Laura Keene’s there is another mass of incongruous architecture, with great plethoric Shakespeare in the centre, at whose feet are some figures of sitting boys holding scrolls, having the appearance of very uncomfortable seat, and dangerous liability of slipping off. At the Broadway, the subject is an allegory, something of Shakespeare-for the Bard of Avon is unmistakably there-but what is about, must ever remain as inscrutable as the Egyptian Sphinx. Then at Wallack’s and the Bowery, we have one, a view on the Hudson, the other the Falls of Niagara, neither possessing a single feature entitling them to rank as works of art. The province of art, as of poetry is to expand the mind, and prepare it for the reception and diffusion of elevated ideas and reflection. And in this respect, has Mr. Smith well chosen his subjects. There are doubtless, who would have preferred a local, or national subject for a drop curtain.

“Without desiring to ignore the beauty of American scenery, or importance of many of our historic annals, let us fairly place the picture before us in the balance, and find out what are its superior attractions and intellectual teachings.

“Americans must bear in mind, that–nationally–we are but infants. We present to the world the nucleus of a great Future, the artist has portrayed the customs and great beauties of the great Past. Therein lies the lesson.

“On the banks of a beautiful river–an arm perhaps of the fair [Argean]–rises a majestic Temple of the Doric order, grand and imposing in its proportions, pure in details. On the steps of the portico a mystic ceremony is taking place. The Seers, are invoking the protection of the Gods on some favored warrior, perhaps, who is evidently about to embark on a warlike expedition, indicated by the fleet of gallies ‘peacefuly slumbering’ on the golden waters.

“When the eye has thoroughly scanned and surveyed the varied beauties of the pictures; then let the mind enquire who were those people who related such imposing edifices, sailed on such gorgeous gallies; and lived in a land of perpetual sunshine?

“As we said before, the picture is a perfect study and well worthy of an extended visit….We predict an entire success to Mr. J. F. Marchant and the new Theatre.”

The fact that this curtain still exists is unbelievable when considering that much of the original scenery was repainted over the years, and then replaced multiple times when the stage was enlarged and repeatedly renovated. The drop itself was widened, shortened and “tweaked.” Regardless of the alterations, Smith’s original design and painting radiate from the fabric.

When looking at the overall history tied to both the curtain and the theater, it is remarkable that anything remains of Smith’s painting. This significant cultural artifact disappeared and reappeared over the years, yet kept returning home. The drop curtain now permanently hangs in the lobby, greeting each new patron who arrives to see a performance at Thalian Hall.

Russell Smith’s curtain at Thalian Hall in Wilmington, North Carolina

I am going to devote the few posts to what I discovered yesterday about the drop curtain and the prolific artist who painted it. Simply put, this curtain is a national treasure.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artists and Scholar: Wilmington, North Carolina, and Scenic Artist Russell Smith

My daily blog follows the life and times of Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934), a prolific scenic artist who worked for sixty years behind the curtain line. In 1931, he compiled a typed manuscript that recorded many of his projects over the years. In the early 1990s when I compiled an index for both this typed manuscript and Moses’ scrapbook, I vowed that one day I would go though his writing, line by line, and expand on each specific event and project mentioned by the artist. I am on year 1909.

I have examined not only his work and that of his contemporaries, but also Moses’ predecessors; scenic artists from previous generations who paved the way for the painting techniques employed not only by the artist, but also at the Sosman & Landis studio. One of Moses’ scenic art predecessors was William Thompson Russell Smith (1812-1896).

Smith was integral in the training of Moses’ one time business partner and life-long friend, Walter Burridge. At one time, Burridge worked at various Philadelphia theaters, many the old stomping grounds of Smith. It was the strong recommendation of Smith who supported Burridge’s employment at the Academy of Music, in Baltimore. Burridge was hired to paint some of the scenery for that venue during his early career.

Smith was mentioned in numerous publications over the years, including the article “Curtain and Scene Painting,” published in the “St. Louis Post-Dispatch,” 21 Jan. 1884, page 8. The article reported, “The other first-class curtain painters of the country do not number more than half-dozen. All enjoy national reputations, and their services are in demand to the other.” The article listed those they held in highest regard, including “Russell Smith, formerly of the Academy of Music, Philadelphia, makes a specialty of landscapes.”

Like Moses, Smith left a legacy that extended far beyond examples of his art for the stage or fine art galleries. Smith left a detailed written account of his life, family and projects. In 1856, Virginia E. Lewis wrote “Russell Smith, Romantic Realist.” She does a wonderful job chronicling Smith’s life while incorporating segments of his words. About a year ago, I decided that it was Smith’s scenic art career that I would explore after completing the life and times of Moses. Smith’s generation of scenic artist defined American scenic art techniques, infusing old world artistry with a new spirit. Moses’ generation further developed and shaped the field of subsequent schools of American scenic art.

I am in Wilmington, North Carolina, to give a presentation on 19^th century scenic art and historical painting techniques. My trip began after a conversation with D. Anthony “Tony” Rivenbark at the League of Historic American Theater’s national conference last July. He is a nationally recognized theatre historian and Executive Director of Wilmington’s Thalian Hall. Tony shared an image of their extant drop curtain painted by Smith in 1858. Although it is no longer used during performance, the painted curtain has been conserved and is prominently displayed at the Thalian Hall Center for the Performing Arts. Here is a link to the theater: http://www.thalianhall.org/#map

I am looking forward to seeing it in person today.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Louisville Scottish Rite, March 20, 2019

On occasion, there were USITT sessions where members visited a Scottish Rite during the conference. The last was in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Lance Brockman and I spoke at the local Scottish Rite – the Humphrey Center. Planning the event was a less than a pleasant experience, and I have been hesitant to propose an off-site session again. That being said, whenever I am attending USITT, I look for a nearby Scottish Rite. It provides me with an opportunity to document just one more collection.

This year, I had multiple requests from colleagues who were attending USITT to visit while I was documenting the Scottish Rite scenery. I always have to check once on site that the Scottish Rite is okay with the extra people showing up during the documentation, but I never mind the company.

Some of the Scottish Rite stage crew who helped during the documentation at the Louisville Scottish Rite.

My only day to photograph the scenery was Wednesday, as there was a Scottish Rite Reunion starting on Thursday. The other logistical parameter for Wednesday was trying to finish up in time to attend the Scene Design Commission meeting. I had from 9AM to 3PM to document as much as possible and make my way back to the convention center. I knew that it would not be enough time to get everything and double-check the inventory. In short, to have people come around and chat really prohibits my ability to rapidly document scenes. However, I also don’t want people to miss the opportunity to see the collection, especially when they have asked in advance.

A group of colleagues from Cobalt visiting the Scottish Rite in Louisville, Kentucky.

Having fun with painted illusion at the Louisville Scottish Rite.

There were a few fortuitous moments on Wednesday that just made the day. The first was meeting Richard Bryant for coffee before heading over to the Scottish Rite. Richard decided to join me for a little bit, as the building was quite close to the convention center. The Masonic stagehands greeted us with donuts and a short visit. So much for my gluten-free diet, as I have no will power against a chocolate donut. Over the course of the morning, Richard did some interviews with his Archiving Technical Theatre Podcast, then ran the light board for one scene so I could capture the painting under different lighting situations. His interviews with the local Masons were such a good idea! This is something that I should have been doing for the past three decades. Richard’s podcast comes out today.

Richard Bryant interviewing a Scottish Rite Mason in Louisville, Kentucky.

Gradually, a series of students and colleagues joined me for a short while and then headed back to the conference. It is always wonderful to listen to their observations about the painting, as I always learn something new. Midway through my project, the Scottish Rite held a small pizza party for our lunch break. It was a wonderful opportunity to chat with the Masons who showed up to help work the lines. Again, so much for being gluten free.

I returned to the convention center for the Scene Design Commission meeting, as I am the VC for Heritage. After the standard introduction, we all broke into our respective sessions to plan for next year. There were only two of us in the Heritage group, Rick and I. The point of the commission meeting is to come up with topics for USITT 2020; these ideas are now filed online with the deadline being June 1. The sessions for next year have been reduced from 1 hour 15 minutes to 45 minutes, with the option for double sessions slots. I am conflicted and a little concerned about the lack of interest in heritage, the reduction of session time, and our industry’s future plans. In hindsight, as I sat with Rick and came up with several session ideas for next year, I realized that this all could have been done over a drink in a bar.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Arriving in Louisville, March 19, 2019

I left Genoa, Illinois, at 5:45 AM on Tuesday, March 19. My goal was to arrive at the Louisville Scottish Rite between noon and 1PM. The drive was pretty uneventful, but there were many places that I wished I had stopped along the way; there is just never enough time. The first was the exit that would have brought me to Thomas G. Moses’ hometown of Sterling, Illinois. The second was the Crump Theatre in Columbus, Indiana. I could not take the time to stop, as I knew that my time was really limited at the Louisville Scottish Rite. My plan was to evaluate the entire collection on Wednesday. Today was simply scoping out the collection, rigging and facility with Rick. Also, this was the only day Rick could visit since the “New World Rigging Symposium” would prevent him from visiting Wednesday.

I contacted my Scottish Rite host Randolph. The intent was to visit for two hours while they were still open. Randolph had scheduled one of the Masonic stagehands to be there – Jim. Jim had worked the stage for many years and was an absolute wealth of information at 75 years old. Fortunately for me, Jim gave me their stage book that provided a little guidance in terms of inventory and line order. This is an unusual gesture, as I often have to prove how much I know before that stage book is passed along.

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system

My visit on Tuesday was primarily about the rigging and Rick’s findings. Rick had a wonderful opportunity to fully explain the significance of this double purchase system to the stewards of this stage. He described that the 1930 system, original to the building, predated the Clancy patent several years later. As interested as I was in the unique aspects of the system I was more anxious to see a few scenes while he was in the flies. They brought in the first line and I began to catalogue information about this 4^th degree interior setting.

My notes were placed within the historical context of the Louisville Scottish Rite that I have explored during the previous week. It was apparent that the majority of the scenery dated from 1910. Toomey & Volland business records noted two scenery deliveries – 1910 and 1951. The drops depicted standard designs and painting techniques characteristic of the studio.

Unfortunately, much of the scenery was restored at one point, with methods that may not be advantageous for the collection’s future. I understand the choices of those who repaired the scene, but wonder how these will age. Most scenes were backed with a type of gauze that appeared plastic, although it may have been the adhesive. The edges of cut scenes were backed with flexible foam core; this I had encountered in Cheyenne. For a new scene, ephemeral in nature, it is a brilliant idea. For historic scenery, I have to wonder how the foam will interact with the fragile fabric in the long run. The painted surface had also been sealed, resulting in a slight sheen. I have no idea what was used for this, as it had a plastic feel; almost reminding me of a product that I used on interactive exhibits for museum projects – Aquaplastic.

Finally, the netting was replaced with a plastic ½” square version; hot melt glued to the back. As Alessia Carpoca and I looked at this alteration near the end of the day, she asked the same question that has gone through my mind multiple times when seeing hot melt glued netting: “How could anyone be so stupid?” It is the idea that the drops of hot glue will never come of the back without damaging the fabric. The hot glue embeds itself in the weave and is permanently fixed. Even steam and heat only partially removed this product, as I have tried in the past. The process completely destroys the painted surface during its removal.

Meanwhile, Rick was occupied doing another good deed (as usual); helping balance some line sets to make them easier to move. He also took the time to thoroughly explain how the system worked and all of the various components. As previously mentioned, the Scottish Rite Reunion was scheduled to start in four days and some of the lines were difficult to pull.

For the most part, we try to leave any stage better than we found it, even if this means simply explaining a system and scenery for future clarity. In Scottish Rite theaters, the Masonic stagehands are often unfamiliar with the history of both. It is not unusual to find something amiss in these systems that require a simple tweak. After all, the systems have often not been maintained since their installation.

After Rick was done with his talk and the weight adjustment, we headed up to the grid. This was one of the easiest ascents ever to access the space above the stage.

Our journey to the grid at the Louisville Scottish Rite

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system above the stage

We went up steps and followed boards above the auditorium space. I kept an eye out for trash, as treasures were often left in these attic spaces. Sure enough, there was a Mazda Edison box! We balanced our way to a small door, with Jim taking quick grip on me to make sure I would not fall. My sense of mortality has exponentially increased over the years, so I don’t wander to close to the edges anymore. However, I wasn’t going to miss an opportunity accompanying Rick and hearing his observations. It is always fun to be on site with Rick, as he so thoroughly explains what I am looking at and the nuances of each system. It is like the rigging class that does not end.

We left the Scottish Rite late afternoon, and I checked into the Hardy House (my Airbnb for the conference). Just about the time I was settling in and deciding to open a can of soup, I received a text from Randolph. He notified me that the Louisville Scottish Rite librarian and archivist would be contacting me soon, offering me the opportunity to visit the Scottish Rite library that evening. Regardless of my fatigue, this was not an opportunity that I would miss. So within the hour, I was waiting outside for my ride to head back to the Louisville Scottish Rite. It was certainly worth it as I spent the next few hours perusing books and chatting with Richard.

Like many, the library was a fraction of what it had once held. Books were missing and the contents somewhat sparse. However, there were certainly some gems left; absolutely priceless publications that would contribute to my ongoing research about visual sources used by scenic studios to produce Scottish Rite scenery. My biggest surprise was a Cerneau book with many recognizable compositions that were later incorporated into the Scottish Rite scenic designs.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Paramount

A vintage photograph of the Paramount in Austin, Texas

The fire curtain at the Paramount Theatre in Austin, Texas. The League of Historic American Theatres conference held their closing party on the stage.

The fire curtain was produced by the St. Louis scenic studio – Toomey & Volland.

Looking up at the Paramount Theatre in Austin, Texas.

The last event for the League of Historic American Theatres (LHAT) was at the Paramount Theatre. We learned about the incredible history of this beautiful historic theater and its inspiring staff. Each of the staff gave brief presentations and insight into the running of their venue. We looked at funding, educational development, community outreach, and productions.

What struck many of us was the passion and dedication clearly apparent as individuals spoke about their role and mission. It is apparent that the employees feel appreciated. They are treated very well; this feeds into and supports their continued dedication. This is such a no brainer. In this venue, labor is not the enemy. Great healthcare, benefits, and support pay off in the long run.

The Paramount perspective: Investments in our greatest asset…our people.

The executive director of the facility took the time to explain their approach. The repeated over and over that they took the time to investment in their greatest asset…our people. This venue treats their patrons and staff equally well. They are an example of what all theaters, and businesses, should aspire too.

Only 20% of their revenue is dependent on grants, with the majority of their funding originating from private sources. They worked hard to achieve this level of success and continue to work hard at it.

The LHAT closing party was held on stage with a Texas barbeque theme, complete with picnic tables, bourbon samples, and sparking lights overhead. Despite everything else that is troubling in the world, we all needed this community event and positive message. The experience left me with a feeling of hope.

Painted detail at the Paramount Theatre in Austin, Texas

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Ample Opportunities, July 17

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Ample Opportunities, July 17

One of our Austin adventures included another trip to the Scottish Rite. We wanted to further explore the effects of electric lighting on the backdrops and brought a few people along. It is delightful to watch people see the magical transformation of light on painted scenery for the first time.

The appearance of light on dry pigment backdrops (also known as distemper painting) is partially created with the specific combination of colors selected by the scenic artist. A blue seascape was not created with pure blue paint from a can, or it would appear flat. A purple shadow was not created with purple paint from a can, or it will appear unnatural. Each backdrop color was a combination of both warm and cool pigments. In college, I was taught to “knock down” the brilliancy of a pure color from the can, adding a complimentary color. Part of this reasoning is to make the painting appear more natural, and not too vibrant as when it comes straight out of the can. Another reason is that both the warm and cool colors uniquely reflect light – it is all about optics.

When making a lovely purple shadow that defines a nineteenth-century forest composition, or some architectural detail, the historical combination of complimentary colors may be ultramarine blue and French mineral orange. This is just one example. There is both a warmth and coolness represented in this color combination throughout the composition.

During two conversations with historic theater owners, I was able to watch their complete comprehension of a historical aesthetic; the facial expressions said everything as they processed the information. That being said, not all people understand color. Not all people understand the variables in painting techniques throughout the 19^th and 20^th century. I encountered two people today who understood both – this is remarkable

Both understood exactly what I was talking about in terms of color palette as we watched the drop’s magical transition under different lighting effects. It was some of the most exciting exchange of information that I have ever had with a potential client. I recorded the scenic illusions in both still photography and videography, capturing the effects of various lighting effects on historical drops. These images were shared with many colleagues at the conference, as well as theatre owners. All were astounded at how the stage composition shifted in appearance and overall composition. At one point, he exclaimed, “I can’t believe how it looks like an entirely different setting now. It’s the lights!” It IS a big deal to present the possibilities to a historic theater owner. This is one of the reasons that early 20^th century scenic studios used electrified models to display the scenery; you have to see it to believe it. There are so many possibilities for the stage, with minimal investment.

After our Scottish Rite adventure, we accompanied our friend Frank Cortez to the Long Center. Cortez runs the backstage area at the Long center as well as taking care of the aging counterweight system at the Austin Scottish Rite. He is an amazing and very talented professional. It is wonderful to see a space through the eyes of someone who has worked in a performance venue for years; there is both the presentation of the flaws and advantages of the venue. What a lovely space. I absorbed much information about the current counterweight system like a sponge; I love the mechanics of the entire system and wish that I had studied the intricacies of theatrical rigging just a tad more while in college. After a long day, we returned to our lodging and later met with a dear friend, Karen Maness. We exchanged stories about scenic art, the Press, and the future of our industry.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Theater Ramble at the League of Historic American Theatres Conference, June 15

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: The Theater Ramble at the League of Historic American Theatres Conference, July 15

There is something wonderful about meeting people who are passionate about historic theaters. Whether they are executive directors, board members, architects, consultants, or technicians, this conference gathers a variety of people from different backgrounds and experiences. The League of Historic American Theatres (LHAT) national conference began on the morning of July 15 with a breakfast. I sat down at one of the large banquet tables and introduced myself to two gentlemen. Wouldn’t you know that they were from the Atlas Theatre in Cheyenne, Wyoming; the same theater that I visited just a few weeks ago on my way to the Santa Fe book release event. It was wonderful to discuss their accomplishments and challenges at their venue. They immediately had questions about the front curtain that I had documented while in their building and my experience with their tour. Small world.

This was the day that many of us were gathered for the LHAT Theatre Ramble. There were sixty of the League members who boarded a bus after breakfast to go on the pre-conference “ramble.” Over the next ten hours, we would visit six historic theaters in the area: the Austin Scottish Rite, the Gaslight Baker Theatre in Lockhart, the Brauntex Performing Arts Theater in New Braufels and the Majestic Theatre, Charline McCombs Empire Theatre and the Tobin Theatre in San Antonio.

The Scottish Rite Theatre in Austin, Texas.

The first stop was the Austin Scottish Rite where I had just spent the past two days. I was asked by our Masonic host, and current Theatre Board president for the venue, to say a few words about the stage and scenery collection. It is always humbling when I am presented as a “national expert” in Scottish Rite scenery and historical scenic art. It is hard to suppress any passion that I have for historical scenery collections and the stage machinery; my enthusiasm has a tendency to spill out with sheer joy about sharing what I love. People recognize this excitement and often express their appreciation, and in turn are excited about their own historic stages. The opportunity to speak about something that I am very passionate about provides one of the best introductions I could have ever to 60 LHAT members.

Many people approached me after my presentation to discuss scenery at their own venues, including one gentleman who showed me a picture of an 1858 Russell Smith curtain. This was a scenic artist from the generation before David Austin Strong and two generations before Thomas Gibbs Moses. I have been slowly plugging through a book about his unpublished manuscript. He was an amazing artist, yet I had only seen black and white photographs of his work To see color detail of this painting and technique in a drop curtain was magical.; a complete unexpected surprise.

The Gaslight Baker Theatre in Lockhart, Texas

After out tour of the Scottish Rite, we headed to the Gaslight Baker Theatre in Lockhart, Texas. This theater opened in 1920 and was proclaimed as the “most modern theatre in the state.” It was later renovated and much of the original grandeur changed as the interior of the auditorium was altered to suggest the interior of a steamship. Even the theatre doors include portholes. Across the street from the theater in Lockhart was a Masonic Temple – go figure. It was hard to ignore, but I hopped back on the bus and we headed to San Antonio where we would visit three more theaters.

In San Antonio we visited the Tobin Center for the Performing Arts; it is listed as a versatile and world-class performing arts facility. Behind a historic façade is a multipurpose performance hall with a mechanized seating system that can transform the space into a flat-floor configuration. This was fascinating to watch the rows of seat appear to unfurl and get placed on stage. There is also a smaller Studio Theatre, and an outdoor performance plaza along the lovely river walk area.

The Empire Theatre in San Antonio, Texas

After the Tobin, we headed to the Empire and Majestic Theatres; two stages that share a common upstage wall. The Majestic is a 1929 theater designed in the Mediterranean style by John Eberson for Karl Hoblitzelle’s Interstate Theatres. The 2,264-seat Majestic Theatre was restored during the 1990s. Nextdoor, the 1913 Charline McCombs Empire Theatre sits on the site of the former Rische’s Opera House. The Empire originally operated as a vaudeville house, but then became a motion picture theater. It was redeveloped as part of the Majestic Theatre project after sitting vacant for years. Both were simply stunning.

The Majestic Theatre in San Antonio, Texas

Our final visit was to the Brauntex Performing Arts Theater, a 1942 movie theater that has survived despite the odds. It was this last stop on the LHAT Theatre Ramble that was the most welcoming. As we departed the bus and entered the theatre, each of us was met by board member who shook our hand and offered a bottle of water. The staff gave a lovely presentation about the history of the venue and its subsequent renovation finished, offering a departing gift as we left the building. It was such a warm and welcoming experience that it ended the tour on a sweet note – especially as each of our swag bags included a gingerbread cookie from the oldest bakery in Texas.

The Gaslight Baker Theatre in Ne Braunfels, Texas

We returned to Austin by 6PM, with just enough time to take a short break before heading back to the hotel for the opening night cocktail reception & welcome dinner. This is a remarkable group of people with a long history. LHAT is an incredible resource for historic theaters, whether they are in large metropolitan areas or small rural towns. As one historic theater owner from Ontario explained, “I like coming here because no one laughs at me for buying a theater, they all understand.” It is a wonderful group of kindred spirits, I am glad to be a member again.

To be continued…