Information about historic theaters, scenic art and stage machinery. Copyright © 2026 by Wendy Rae Waszut-Barrett, PhD
Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
The original front curtain by the Twin City Scenic Co. for the Brown Grand Theatre in Concordia, Kansas, 1907.
The painted replica, also delivered by the Twin City Scenic Co.
For more scenes from the venue, keyword search “Brown Grand.”
Copyright © 2021 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
Scene painted by Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio of Chicago for the Scottish Rite Theatre in Tucson, Arizona, 1914.
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
I am ending 2020 with a winter scene. It seems appropriate for the winter solstice tonight, despite the fact that there is no snow on the ground, and I live in Minnesota! I will resume posting after the upcoming presidential inauguration, allowing myself a day or two of celebratory recovery.
In September 2020, I led a group of volunteers at the Tabor Opera House to document nineteenth-century wings, shutters, borders and set pieces in the attic. After my visit, I began examining each piece in detail, creating condition reports, historical analyses, replacement appraisals, and a collections care management document. There is scenery spanning from 1879 to 1902 at the Tabor Opera House, a remarkable scope that shows the transition from wing-and-shutter scenery to fly drops.
On site, there was one lone shutter that depicted a snowy landscape. It was all that remained of a pair, with a winter scene painted on the back of an original wood shutter constructed for the 1879 stage. When the shutters were repainted in 1888, the fabric was replaced on the second shutter, possibly the result of irreparable damage. This is when the winter scene lost its mate.
The pine frame was originally covered with standard cotton sheeting manufactured at Boott Mills in Lowell, Massachusetts. When the frame was recovered, the new fabric was standard drillings from Stark Mills in Manchester, New Hampshire.
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year! See you in 2021!
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
In September 2020, I led a group of volunteers at the Tabor Opera House to document nineteenth-century wings, shutters, borders and set pieces in the attic. After my visit, I began examining each piece in detail, creating condition reports, historical analyses, replacement appraisals, and a collections care management document. There are at least twelve theatre collections, with scenic artifacts divided by artist and/or period.
This project is similar to receiving a big bag of puzzle pieces, containing an unknown number of puzzles with no other information. There are no box tops that show you the completed picture, but you need to somehow assemble each of the puzzles. By the way, not all of the pieces are original, and some may have been altered over the years.
There are so many moving parts, creators and timelines, that some days the projects is a bit overwhelming and I have to step away; allowing the information to process. When I return a few hours later, something becomes a little more clear.
Such was the case with pieces from the pink interior setting. Of the set, I catalogued only two wings and a remnant this fall. The construction of the two wings is on par with other pieces built from 1879-1881. The painting, however, appears to be the work of T. Frank Cox, dating from 1887-1888. Each wing is also double-sided, with a palace interior on the reverse. The palace composition was painted in the 1890s, combining several wings from a variety of settings. However, a fabric remnant shows that the backside of the original fabric was a prison setting, now hidden between the two layers of fabric. The pink setting fabric is rough cotton sheeting from Boott Mills, whereas the second layer of fabric on the reverse side is standard drillings from Stark Mills.
However, high above the attic floor there are two more pieces, currently inaccessible and stored in a makeshift loft. They were placed there before additional joists and wiring went in, so we could not remove them this fall due to a limited amount of time. The two additional wings are leaning against the same wall that is above the proscenium arch in the attic. This wall divides the attic from a space that was once hotel rooms and the gridiron and stage machinery above the stage. I climbed the ladder to the grid and we assembled a makeshift walkway over the open joists to reach the pile. I could only take a of few photos of the piles, as nothing could be shifted at the time. Too much dirt would have floated down upon the project below, and we really needed to construct a temporary floor. There were two pieces from the pink interior setting visible in the pile; one being a door wing. Other pieces included shutters, rollers, windows, and other set pieces.
As I compiled the various condition reports about the pink setting yesterday, I noticed a slight pattern in the pink; it was an underlying composition. Altering the detail and contrast of the image once it was in grayscale, helped me identify what was painted below, and then I added a few lines to help others identify the painted panels.
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Rae Waszut-Barrett
In 2018, I visited the Scottish Rite theater in Salina, Kansas. It was on my return trip from Santa Fe, New Mexico, to Minneapolis, Minnesota. Although I had documented the Salina collection before, I want to see the current condition of the deteriorating drops.
The Salina Scottish Rite theater was part of a 1920s Masonic building boom. Many Scottish Rite theaters with existing scenery collections enlarged their facilities and purchased new collections, trading in their old scenery for credit on a new purchase. These used scenery collections were then resold to other Scottish Rite theaters for a fraction of the original cost. In other cases, the Masons brokered their own used scenery deal, transferring scenery from one theater to another. That was the case with the 1908 McAlester scenery collection. The Salina Masons purchased the used scenery collection from the McAlester Scottish Rite. The collection was originally painted at the Sosman & Landis Studio. Here is the cathedral setting; one of the more complex scenes. For more information about Scottish Rite scenery and theaters, visit www.drypigment.com and use the keyword search function
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
The story of the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, is interwoven with that of Gov. H. A. W. Tabor, Augusta Tabor, and Baby Doe Tabor. The 1932 film was based on David Karsner’s book, “Silver Dollar,” tracing the ups and downs of this one-time silver magnate and his two wives.
On Dec. 1, 1932, the world premiere of “Silver Dollar” was held at the Denver Theatre, previously known as the Tabor Grand Opera House. Prior to the premiere, movie representatives scoured Leadville for artifacts to display at the upcoming event. They visited Baby Doe in Leadville and searched throughout the opera house for remnants from Tabor’s glory days.
On Dec. 9, 1932, “Steamboat Pilot” announced, “Leadville Relics Taken to Denver for ‘Silver Dollar.’ The article reported, “The theater men also went to the Elks, once the famous Tabor opera house of Leadville, seeking relics of the olden days. They secured a stage drop and four magnificent velvet drapes of the ornate Tabor days. Both drop and drapes are said to be older than the curtain at the old Tabor Grand theater in Denver” (page 3). Note the article did not state that the men secured the original drop curtain, or any painted front curtain from the Tabor Opera House in Leadville,
For additional context, the original drop curtain for the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver was painted by Robert Hopkin in 1881, two years after the Tabor Opera House in Denver opened. It was an impressive scene of ancient ruins and the Charles Kinsley quote: “So fleet the works of men, back to their earth again; Ancient and holy things fade like a dream.” How apropos.
After the drop from the Tabor Opera House was used for the 1932 premiere, it seems to have disappeared from sight and institutional memory. For decades, many believed that the movie representatives failed to return the drop; some even believed that it was the original 1879 front curtain. At the time that it went out on loan, there was no loan agreement, or any description of what was being lent out for display at the movie premier. Others hoped that somewhere, amidst the piles of the scenery in the Tabor Opera House attic, the missing drop was carefully tucked away, awaiting discovery.
In February 2020, a missing roll drop was discovered at the Tabor Opera House, hiding on stage in plain sight. At the time, I was leading a group of local volunteers to document the scenery on stage. Near the end of the documentation process, we spotted something suspended just below the pin rail. We lowered the piece and unrolled the scene. It was roll drop with a palace arch composition. This piece was possibly the same drop lent out for the movie premiere and returned to a secure place.
It was certainly not the original drop curtain for the Tabor Opera House in 1879; wrong composition. The original front curtain was described in an article for the “Leadville Weekly Herald” on November 15, 1879 (page 3 ): “The drop curtain is a masterpiece from the brush of Mr. Lamphere, and represents a glorious mountain scene, at the base of which is a fine old castle, with a stream running at the foot; alongside of the water is a rugged road, which ends in the winding of canyon.” The size also indicates that it could not fill the proscenium opening, suggesting that the roll drop was some type of backing piece. Furthermore, the proportions and forced perspective suggest a far upstage placement near the back wall, almost as a masking flat. A few years later, the stage and scenery were refurbished, and a new drop curtain was painted.
The small size of the extant roll drop likely made it into a perfect artifact to put on display for the 1932 premier; small, compact, and easily transportable. The wings or shutters in the Tabor Opera House attic would have been too difficult to remove, transport and display in winter. The roll drop also exhibits all of the characteristics of having been partially “touch-up” for the movie premiere. Interestingly, only a portion was refurbished, and not the entire composition; the top quarter of the scene was left “as is.” The refurbished section suggest that the piece was partially exhibited in a nearby lobby or a reception room. This top portion of the drop was possibly rolled, or draped over a bar, unseen. It was refurbished to fit in a shorter venue. Keep in mind that none of the original scenery would have worked well at the Tabor Grand Opera House, as it was simply too small for the proscenium opening.
Furthermore, the roll drop that we discovered last February was actually documented in 1933 as part of a Scenery Project led by Muriel Sibell Wolle (1898-1977). In December 1933, Wolle led a group to of students, a former Tabor stage manager, and professors set up and photograph many of the scenes on stage at the Tabor House. This documentation did not include the wings and shutters that were stored in the attic. Wolle also sketched each set and made color notes, later making watercolor paintings for each piece. For more images from the 1933 Scenery Project, visit: https://digital.denverlibrary.org/digital/collection/p15330coll22/search/searchterm/1933%20Scenery%20project
There is a historic photograph of the curtain in the Denver Public Library digital collections database. Although the exact date remains unknown, the roll drop is visible as a backing piece for an interior setting, dated prior to the stage renovation by the Elks.
To be continued…
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
In America, many nineteenth-century opera houses repeatedly purchased stage scenery, updating and expanding their existing stock. Scenic artists and their stage work drew crowds, just like popular stage personalities. The names of scenic artists were prominently displayed in many advertisements. Articles described their work and the scenic art process in detail, placing their contribution to a production on par with the leading performers.
Last February, I led a group of volunteers to document all of the scenery on stage at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. It was the first phase of the project, with the second phase occurring in September. The second phase focused on a much older scenery collection stored in the attic, placed there after the stage was renovated by the Elks in 1902. There were several pieces painted by Tignal Frank Cox in both locations. The first piece that we discovered was a tree profile, constructed of roughhewn lumber and coarse cotton fabric. On the backside of the tree was a charcoal sketch; a cartoon depicting a scenic artist in coveralls. Above the scenic artist was the caption: “Frank Cox, Scenic Artist Jan. 30 ‘88.” Cox also painted his initials on the front of the tree. They appear to be carved into the trunk, alongside other initials.
Keep in mind that it is extremely rare to find a piece of stock scene signed and dated by the artist. Some pieces carried a studio mark, but seldom an individual artist’s name. Occasionally, individual artists and studios marked the corner of the central composition on a drop curtain (painted front curtain). Until my trip to Leadville, I had not encountered a signed and dated piece of nineteenth-century stock scenery.
Beginning in 1881, the Tabor Opera House was managed by J. H. Cragg. Cragg secured the painting services of Cox near the end of 1887. Cox completed his work for Cragg at the end of January 1888, and then headed to DeRemer’s Opera House in Pueblo. Cox painted a forest scene for both DeRemer’s Opera House and the Tabor Opera House.
To date, I have identified three extant settings painted by Cox for the Tabor Opera House. This “Cox Scenery Collection” includes a forest scene, a street scene and a Rocky Pass. The forest setting consists of two full shutters, two cut shutters and a tree profile. Both the street scene and the Rocky Pass scene are composed of only two shutters.
Cox’s painting project for the Tabor was part of a much larger vision that involved the 1888 establishment of the Silver Circuit. In 1881, J. H. Cragg became manager of the Tabor Opera House in Leadville; the same year that H. A. W. Tabor built the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver. By 1884, Peter McCourt (Baby Doe’s brother) became the manager at the Tabor Grand, and was responsible for booking both the Tabor Grand and Tabor Opera House productions. McCourt soon expanded his bookings to other venues, establishing a Colorado Circuit, also known as the Tabor Circuit. Stops in the circuit included opera houses throughout Colorado, Utah and southern Wyoming. By March 1888, McCourt announced the official formation of a “Silver Circuit,” targeting the wealth associated with mining areas. Keep in mind that McCourt announced the establishment of a Silver Circuit only two months after Cragg hired Cox to paint the new scenes. The “official inauguration” of the Silver circuit, however, did not occur until July 1889. In the end, it included thirteen stops: Denver, Leadville, Aspen, Salida, Colorado Springs, Pueblo and Trinidad in Colorado; Salt Lake City, Provo, Ogden and Park City in Utah; and Evanston and Rawlins in Wyoming.
On January 14, 1888, the “Leadville Evening Chronicle” reported, “Frank Cox, a New York artist, is engaged painting several new scenes at the opera house. Manager Cragg has engaged him for a short time, and his productions are something unusual in the scene painting line. Mr. Cox painted the scenes that were so much admired in acts III and IV of Ingomar” (page 4). Act III of “Ingomar” was set in a mountain camp, likely using Cox’s recently painted rocky pass shutters. Act IV was set on the edge of a forest that possibly used Cox’s new forest setting. Lillian Olcott was featured in the touring production of “Ingomar” during 1887 and the beginning of 1888. She and her company performed both “Ingomar” and “Theodora” in Leadville at the beginning of January. The Tabor Opera House was one of her last stops on tour before she passed away in March. Newspapers across the country reported that Olcott grew ill after surviving a blizzard and died in a hotel.
Then, as now, travel throughout the mountains in winter was unpredictable and often treacherous, but this did not prevent people from completing a theatrical tour or traveling to nearby venues. Cox completed his work at the Table Opera House by the end of January. On February 1, 1888, the “Leadville Evening Chronicle” announced, “A handsome new ‘set’ house and a new wood ‘flat’ has been added to the scenic properties of the Tabor, this city. Both were painted by Mr. Frank Cox, of New York, and are excellent examples of the scenic art” (page 4).
On a secondary note, the mention that Cox’s new scenery was used in “Ingomar” is also of interest, as Olcott’s shows purportedly toured with their own “special scenery.” Advertisements for both “Ingomar” and “Theodora” promised, “all the wealth of scenery and appointments that characterized their production in London and Paris” (The Courier, Lincoln, NE, 20 Dec 1887, page 6). However, after “Theodora” played at the Tabor Opera House in January, one Leadville critic commented, “The company’s ‘special scenery’ was mainly conspicuous by its absence, but some very good stage settings were arranged, none the less.”
After completing his work in Leadville, Cox secured work in Pueblo, Colorado. In Pueblo, he not only worked as a scenic artist for DeRemer’s Opera House, but also performed as a “Lightning Artist.” Prior to his performance and work for DeRemer’s Cox flooded local newspapers with announcements, advertisements and articles about his art.
On Feb. 12, 1888, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” included an article entitled “The Tramp Painter.” It read:
“The following has been handed us for publication, which explains itself.
PUEBLO, COLO, February 8, 1888.
Mr. Frank Cox,
Desiring to witness an exhibition of your rapid landscape painting and character sketching in charcoal, accompanied by your famous talk, “The Tramp Painter,” or “The Sketch Artist En Tour,” we respectfully request you to favor Pueblo with an early date most convenient yourself.
Jos. Hitchins, T.G. McCarthy, O. E. Pettis, L. B. Strait, Rev. W. C. Madison, Geo. M. Haight, W. W. Strait, A. B. Patton, and many others.
___
Messrs. Haight, Hitchins and others,
GENTLEMEN – In reply to the above request, I will state that I will be pleased to respond, and will appoint Friday evening, February 17, as the date, and DeRemer opera house as the place of entertainment, at which time I will paint four landscapes in oil 4×6 feet, each in ten minutes besides numerous charcoal sketches of the same size in much less time.
Yours Truly,
Frank Cox.
In addition to this announcement, Cox daily advertised in the “Colorado Daily Chieftain.” From Feb. 14 to Feb. 17 the newspaper included mentions of his act. For example, on Feb. 15, 1888, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” reported, “Mr. Frank Cox, the lighting landscape painter who will appear at DeRemer’s opera house on the evening of the 17th instant, will amuse and instruct all who attend, and we trust that he will be greeted by a large audience.”
The announcement was accompanied by a nearby advertisement:
Cox also posted short reminders in the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” – “Don’t miss seeing Frank Cox, the artist at DeRemer’s” (“Colorado Daily Chieftain”, Feb 17, 1888, page 4).
The day before his performance, Cox submitted another article entitled “A Fire at Sea.” It described, “The event of the season will be the appearance of Mr. Frank Cox, the lightning artist at DeRemer’s Friday evening, February 17. On this occasion Mr. Cox will paint his wonderful ‘Fire at Sea,’ in which he first paints a moonlight ocean, then a ship, then sets it on fire (with color), then brings another ship to the rescue, which also burns and the picture is left a calm, open sea, with no vessel in sight, and even the smoke is cleared away. You will probably never have an opportunity of witnessing such a grand spectacle and should not fail to attend. Tickets 25 and 50 cents.”
On the day of the performance, Cox was featured in the “Amusements” section. Under the heading “The Tramp Painter,” the article noted:
“To-night is the date of the most extraordinary and wonderful entertainment ever seen in Pueblo, on which occasion Mr. Frank Cox, the lighting artist, delivers his famous talk “The Tramp Painter” at DeRemer, illustrating it as he proceeds with numerus black and white sketches and four large oil paintings, all executed on the stage before your eyes. Fifty sketches will be made during the evening, and a more enjoyable affair has probably never been offered to the people of Pueblo. All lovers of the beautiful in art should attend and witness this performance. The price of admission is 15 and 50 cents, within the reach of all, and we hope to see the DeRemer crowded.”
In addition to performing, Cox also painted scenery for DeRemer’s Opera House. On February 19, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” announced, “Frank Cox, the artist is at work on a new scene at the DeRemer opera house. It is what is known as a ‘cut wood’ scene, the first one yet made there. It shows large trees, with foliage overhead, while the canvas is cut away from around the trunks of the trees, making a very forest like appearance (page 4). This is exactly what Cox also painted for the Tabor Opera House in Leadville.
After Pueblo, Cox traveled to Trinidad, Colorado. On March 4, 1888, the “Colorado Daily Chieftain” announced, “Frank Cox, the artist, is lecturing at Trinidad” (page 4).
To be continued…
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
From Sept. 21-27, 2020, I led a group of volunteers to document the nineteenth-century scenery collection stored in the attic at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. The wings, shutters, borders and other set pieces primarily dated from 1879 to 1890; each painted before the stage was renovated in 1902. One of the more interesting scenic pieces uncovered was a train. All that remained of the profile piece was the front end, with only a headlamp, chimney, cowcatcher (pilot) and boiler front remaining. The rest of the train was missing; the fabric likely removed and repainted for another setting over a century ago.
There were many nineteenth-century melodramas with exciting railroad scenes, complete with painted tracks and steaming locomotives. A variety of productions included that terrifying moment when a train raced full speed toward the hero or heroine. Whether the performer was tied to the tracks, or lying unconscious on the rails, the victim was always snatched away just prior to the train’s passing.
On Dec. 30, 1886, Leadville’s “Herald Democrat” noted the train scene in the recent production of “Under the Gaslight” at the opera house. The review reports, “The opera house was crowded last evening to witness this great scenic melodrama, which so entertainingly depicts may phases of high and low life in the great city of New York…The exciting railroad scene was given in grand style and evoked the heartiest approbation.” The touring show featured Lew Morrison and his Dramatic Company. However, “Under the Gaslight” was just one of the troupe’s offerings. The company also performed in “Not Guilty,” “Celebrated Case,” and “Faust.”
It is almost impossible to determine the exact production that first used the painted train before it was relegated as part of the stock. There are clues, however, that help estimate manufacture date. First and foremost, the construction of the piece was with odds and ends, not finely planed theatrical lumber. The profile piece also incorporated remnants of a wood shipping container for the cut edge. A portion of a company name, stenciled for shipping purposes, remains – Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. This helps determine an approximate date when added to the roughhewn board. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. means that the piece was created after 1884, and not before.
The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. has quite an interesting history, once running a regional office in Denver, Colorado. Founded by John Moses Brunswick, the J. M. Brunswick Manufacturing Co opened on September 15, 1845, in Cincinnati, Ohio. Although initially specializing in the manufacture of carriages, the firm soon turned their focus to billiard tables. Brunswick billiard tables were an immediate success, and soon the company expanded nationwide, opening regional branches across the country that included Chicago, St. Louis and New Orleans. By 1866, the firm was renamed J. M. Brunswick & Brother, as Brunswick added family members to run their regional offices. Keep in mind that in the 1860s, there were three main billiard manufacturers in the United States: J. M. Brunswick & Bro; Julius Balke’s Great Western Billiard Manufactory, and Phelan & Collender. In regard to Phelan & Collander, the name changed to the H. W. Collender Company after Hugh Collender’s father-in-law (Michael Phelan) passed away.
By 1874, J. M. Brunswick & Brother merged with Julius Balke’s Great Western Billiard Manufactory, becoming J. M. Brunswick & Balke Co. The firm incorporated in 1879, and then merged with another competitor – H. W. Collender Company. In merging with Collender, Brunswick acquired Collender’s patented billiard cushions, but the company was not renamed for another five years. In 1884, the formation of Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company indicated a monopoly of American billiard manufacturers.
As the years passed, the company manufactured many other products that included bar counters, saloon fixtures, bowling alley supplies, poker checks, cigar counters, beer coolers, refrigerators, chairs, tables, lamps, and other products. It remains unclear what was in the wooden shipping box that was used for the train profile at the Tabor Opera House. By the twentieth century the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. product line was further diversified, adding toilet seats, car tires, phonographs, WWII target drone aircraft, school furniture, golfing equipment and pinsetters. Such variety! The company again changed its name in 1960, becoming the Brunswick Corporation on August 10. For more information about the history of this fascinating company, visit: http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/brunswick-corporation-history/
For more information about the Tabor Opera House’s historic scenery collection, visit www.drypigment.net and keyword search “Tabor Opera House.”
To be continued…
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
On June 19, 2018, I first examined the historic scenery collection in the Tabor Opera House attic. It was rumored to be the original installation from 1879, and I wanted to find something that supported this speculation. I was traveling with my family from Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Santa Fe, New Mexico. In Santa Fe, I was scheduled to participate in a book signing event for the “Santa Fe Scottish Rite Temple: Freemasonry, Architecture and Theatre,” published by the Museum of New Mexico that spring. Here is a link to the book: https://www.amazon.com/Santa-Scottish-Rite-Temple-Architecture/dp/0890136335/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=waszut-barrett&qid=1604502787&sr=8-1_. The book signing was scheduled for June 24 at the Santa Fe Scottish Rite, so we only had a few days to linger on trip there.
While traveling across the country, I documented historic scenery at several venues, including the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. We pulled into Leadville on June 18, having scheduled a quick stop at the Tabor Opera House, before heading to Twin Lakes and Independence Pass. The next day was my 49th birthday, and I decided to treat myself to a morning in the attic at the Tabor Opera House. Although this greatly excited me, I did not ask my husband and son to join me, as their excitement for historic theatres was rapidly waning. In the attic, I carefully shifted flats piled against a far wall, encountering a surprise as each layer was unveiled. My husband and son were scheduled to pick me up at noon, so I had only a few hours to get a sense of what was hidden below piles of dust and debris.
In addition to marveling at the painted compositions, I examined the back of many pieces for clues. Often, there is more information on the back than the front. I look at fabric weave, construction techniques, mill stamps, studio stencils and basic graffiti. A “Boott Mills” stamp appeared several times on the backs of both borders and wings.
One particular piece caught my eye – a stage right wing. Additional information on the Boott Mill stamp included “Standard Sheetings. FF. 40 yds.”
The painted composition and construction indicate that the wing functioned as a grand tormentor in the 1880s. It was part of a pair; the stage left wing now missing. The wing was constructed to roll, unlike other wings in the attic. Also, the corresponding shutters for the wings that did not roll, commercial flat sheaves dating from 1888. The rolling hardware on the wing was unique, using a sash pulley to roll the unit. Unlike flat sheaves, sash pulleys were readily available from local suppliers for standard building construction. Keep in mind that when the Tabor opera house was built, all of the materials where shipped in by stagecoach; the railway had yet to reach Leadville. On January 22, 1880, the Denver and Rio Grande was the first railroad to reach Leadville, with the Tabor Opera House officially opening in November 1879.
Furthermore, the quality of the fabric, the frame construction, and hardware of the extant wing, all indicate that this piece was part of the original collection, prior to the arrival of the railroad in Leadville. Regardless of the exact manufacture date, the wing pre-dates most other attic scenery that was painted and signed by T. Frank Cox in January 1888.
There is a second factor to consider about the orphaned wing. The painted composition dates from later than its original construction. The painting matches a complete interior setting that was also stored in the attic, with some flats showing signs of repainting. Repainted scenery was commonplace throughout the nineteenth-century. Wings, shutters and borders were “washed down,” effectively removing the water-based paint from an existing flat before being repainted with a new scene. Scenic Studios also advertised shipping painted scenes for existing frames. This saved the travel and expense of an artist working on site at a theater, as well as the expense of new frame construction. Repainting existing scenes avoided the exorbitant costs associated with purchasing an entirely new stock scenery collection.
As far as the history of Boott Mills…
Boott Mills was established in Lowell, Massachusetts, along the Merrimack River. Located twenty-five miles northwest of Boston, Boott Mills initially operated with hydropower, a waterwheel powering the line shaft that ran the length of the factory floor. Leather belts that operated each loom were attached to the line shaft. Steam engines soon replaced the original water turbines, and mill operations later transitioned to electricity.
The Lowell area boasted an extensive group of cotton mills, built alongside power canals constructed during the early nineteenth century. Boott Mills was situated near the Merrimack Canal, the first of many power canals in Lowell. By the mid-nineteenth century there were approximately 150 mills operating in Lowell, an astounding number that specialized in a variety of products.
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, most American mills were designed to produce a turnkey product, specializing in only one aspect of textile manufacturing. Raw Cotton had to be cleaned, spun, carded and wove into cloth. Once the cloth was completed, the material was shipped to other companies that manufactured specific products. Later, cotton bales arrived at a mill and were turned into cloth in the same location, going through the process of cleaning, spinning, carding, rolling and weaving on site. Technological advancements in the weaving industry resulted in the power loom. The power loom was responsible for the mass production of textiles.
In America, Paul Moody developed the first successful power loom by 1816, working for Francis Cabot Lowell at Waltham mills. Moody later ran the Merrimack Manufacturing Co. in Lowell. Kirk Boott (1790-1837), namesake of Boott Mills, was the first agent and treasurer for the Merrimack Manufacturing Company. Boott later built his first mill, initially constructing four buildings in 1835. Over the decades, Boott Mills expanded into a massive complex, shifting from hydropower, to steam, and finally electricity for operations. Like other companies, Boott Mills constantly incorporated new technology to increase overall output.
Ira Draper improved Moody’s design, allowing a mill worker to operate two machines simultaneously. By the mid-nineteenth century, improvements continued and now one mill worker would operate a dozen of machines, greatly increasing the amount of product produced at a mill. As with most factories, profits increased substantially as worker wages stagnated. In short, mill workers assumed more responsibilities for the same wage, allowing overall production costs to decrease while profits dramatically increased.
As with other industries, the textile industry transitioned from an economic system of independent craftsmen to a factory system of mass-produced goods where the role of craftsman was often reduced to that of common laborer. This shift in the textile industry was accelerated during the post-Civil War era when much of the textile industry moved south. New mills were established in areas where labor was much cheaper and cotton more accessible. This meant that southern millworks collected greater profits, investing additional funds in newer technology. Many northern mills did not have the equivalent returns to equip their factories with comparable machinery. By the 1920s, northern mills, including those in Lowell, began to close as they were unable to compete with their southern counterparts.
Boott Mills ceased their operations in 1958, and by the 1960s unemployment in Lowell was among the highest in the country. Throughout the economic downturn, many of the Boott Mill buildings remained standing a decade after the factory closed. By the 1970s Boott Mill buildings became part of the Lowell National Historical Park. For more information about the Boott Mills Museum, visit: https://npplan.com/parks-by-state/massachusetts-national-parks/lowell-national-historical-park-park-at-a-glance/lowell-national-historical-park-museums-and-exhibits/lowell-national-historical-park-boott-cotton-mills-museum/
The Boott Mills Museum features a Weave Room and several informational exhibits. The Weave Room is a scaled-down reproduction of a mill factory floor, complete with working looms. The machinery on display are primarily Draper machines, dating from the early twentieth century. The Weave Room still manufactures cloth for dish towels that are sold in the gift shop. Here is a lovely video of the looms working: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/From_line_shaft_to_power_looms.ogv
Other Boott Mill buildings were converted into shops, apartments, condos and offices.
I have already contacted the Boott Mills Museum to confirm the mill stamp usage dates on the Tabor Opera House wing, and am currently awaiting a response. This post at www.drypigment.net will be updated once I have any additional information.
To be continued…
Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
A small step unit was uncovered at the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, while I was on site from September 21 to 27, 2020. It was clearly identified as part of the setting for Julius Cahn’s production of “David Harum.” A shipping label from the Globe Express Company noted the intended delivery from Leadville to “David Harum Co. c/o Tabor Grand Opera House, Denver, Colo.”
Why or when the “David Harum” step unit was first placed in the attic of the Tabor Opera House remains a mystery. Was it simple a touring piece left behind, never forwarded to the next venue? The piece likely dates from 1901-1905; my estimation based on newspaper advertisements, the shipping labels and actual construction of the piece. For over a century, this scenic orphan was hidden in a pile, disguised under a layer of dust, until this fall.
It is hard not to consider the history of the step unit. When it first toured, how many thousands of people witnessed a favorite stage personality pause on this very piece? How many stages provided the foundation for the step unit before it was abandoned in Leadville? Although many questions remain unanswered, “David Harum” was an extremely popular piece during the first half of the twentieth century. I knew nothing about this production until my visit to the Tabor Opera House this fall.
There is a famous line from the show that accompanied many 1905 advertisements for the production: “Do unto the other feller the way he’d do unto you. But do it first.” The line was delivered by Harum, a small-town banker from the 1890s. The simple character captivated western audiences, especially when the show toured the western states. Edward Noyes Wescott’s 1898 novel was dramatized for the stage by R & M. W Hitchcock in 1900. At the time theatre critics commented, “There were many misgivings as to the possibility of making a successful play from a story which was so thoroughly a character sketch” (Carbonate Chronicle, 24 June 1901).
The initial touring production starred William H. Crane. Crane continued in the role for a few years before being replaced by William H. Turner. “David Harum” first appeared in Leadville during 1900, then starring Crane. By 1901, Julius Cahn was linked with the touring production of “David Harum” and by 1904, Cahn’s “David Harum” featured William H. Turner at the Elk’s Opera House in Leadville. That February, the “Herald Democrat” reported, “Mr. Julius Cahn will present W. H. Turner in the dramatization of Westcott’s widely read book, “David Harum,” at the Elk’s opera house next Thursday evening. The play is now nearly three years old, and since its production it has been a phenomenal success. For sixteen weeks it ran in New York, for six weeks in Chicago, for two months in Boston where it proved to be a record beaked in point of attendance, and for six weeks in Philadelphia” (February 7, 1904).
The show returned to Leadville again the following year. On March 12, 1905, an article in the “Herald Democrat” stated, “Mr. Cahn personally superintended the getting up of the production, and paid much attention to its cast…its success has been extraordinary” (March 12, 1905).
On March 24, 1905, and advertisement in Leadville’s “Herald Democrat” announced:
Elk’s Opera House. Wednesday, March 29. Julius Cahn Presents DAVID HARUM.
The Play That Won’t Wear Out. The Epic of the “Hoss” trade. Quaintly Delightful. An Excellent Company.
WM. H. TURNER as David Harum. Mr. Cahn utilizes the same production here as see at the Garrick Theatre, New York. DAVID HARUM SAYS:
“Do unto the other feller the way he’d do unto you.
But do it first.”
Prices: 50, 75 and $1.00. Advance sale
opens Sunday, March 26, as West’s Cigar Store.
Another “Herald Democrat” article reported, “Nearly all of the familiar sayings, quaint philosophy, and amusing incidents of the story are in the play. One of the best things in the book and one of the best things in the play is the horse trade, which takes place in the opening act” (Feb. 19, 1905).
The first act setting was later described in detail: “The opening scene of the play is an exterior. On one side is Aunt Polly’s house with its trellis-covered veranda and old-fashioned garden. On the other is David’s bank, and in the background is the big barn. In this act Harum sells the bulky horse to Deacon Perkins – the horse that would “stand without hitchin’ ” (Herald Democrat, Leadville, 12 March 1905). David’s horses were kept in the barn.
The “Herald Democrat” noted, “The second act, which is laid in Harum’s bank shows the old chap as a businessman. The act contains the incident of the counterfeit five-dollar bills, the tussle with Bill Montaig, the village tough, and the securing of the mortgages on the Widow Cullom’s home” (Feb. 19, 1905). The setting included the counting room in the back office of the bank.
The third act was placed in Aunt Polly’s sitting room on Christmas. The action included the telling of Harum’s visit to the circus with Billy P. Cullom and the engagement of Mary Blake and John Lenox. After Christmas dinner the act ended with the comical uncorking of a champagne bottle.
Of the 1905 production in Leadville, the “Herald Democrat” reported, “The company, which is under the direction of Julius Cahn, contains a number of clever character actors, and unless the indications are very much astray they will be greeted by a crowded house for Mr. Cahn will utilize the identical production seen at the Garrick theatre, New York City” (Feb. 19, 1905)
On March 29, 1905, the “Herald Democratic” reported, “The presentation of “David Harum” which is to be made at the Elk’s Opera House Wednesday, March 29, should prove highly diverting…The success of the play has reached an extraordinary pitch, and, judging from the things said of the work, there is no reason why results should be otherwise. The play is clean, it is wholesome, its atmosphere is redolent of the country and its humor is of the healthy kind…In dramatizing “David Harum”, every effort was made to return all of those things which made the book so entertaining. The play is remarkable in one way, and that is, that it has been said again and again by competent critics to be an improvement upon the book. As a rule many dramatizations have failed to thoroughly catch the spirit of the novels from which they were taken. This is not the case, however, with “David Harum,” and it is the most satisfying comedy of its class now before the public. Wm. H. Turner has the role of “Harum” and his work has been praised highly.”
On March 28, 1905, the “Aspen Daily Times,” provided a little more information about the leading actor in the production, William Turner. The article reported, “On Tuesday evening Julius Cahn presents at the Wheeler Opera House “the play of book plays,” “David Harum.” Mr. William H. Turner will be seen as “David. Mr. Turner has been under Mr. Cahn’s management for the past twelve years, during which time he has appeared in many notable Metropolitan successes, scoring personal hits in many productions among which are remembered, Rufus in “Held by the Enemy,” Mr. Austine in “The Faint Card,” Mr. Watkins in “Sowing the Wind,” Black Michael in “The Prisoner of Zenda,” John Wotherby in “Because She Loved Him So,” and Dr. Pettypont in “The Girl from Maxims.”
The story of “David Harum” remained popular for the next fifty years, standing the test of time and translating to film. The first film adaption occurred in 1915, but Will Rogers later starred in the 1934 version.
By 1936, “David Harum” became a radio serial that lasted until 1951. “David Harum” even became the name of an ice cream sundae, consisting of vanilla ice cream, crushed strawberry, and crushed pineapple, whipped cream and a cherry.
Who knew that such a small scenic piece could tell such a large story.
To be continued…