Drypigment.net

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

My return from the UK on August 12 was relatively uneventful – at first. Sadly, four days after my return I became quite sick – a sore throat quickly became a severe respiratory infection. Although I never tested positive for COVID, this particular illness confined to me to bed for over two weeks.

That is the reason why there was a flurry of posts about my UK trip mid-August. Researching a handful of English scenic artists and historic venues prevented me from worrying about all of the projects that needed to be completed by Sept. 12.

The initial delay had started well before my departure to the UK. In June, our basement flooded (water heater burst – destroying the flooring in our master bedroom, laundry room, and my research office). Thankfully, nothing of consequence was damaged. However, this unfortunate event caused a series of delays, each one falling like a Domino.

Despite the ongoing delays and my continued illness, I still had a show to finish in August, an annual family trip (Labor Day weekend), and a 31^st wedding anniversary (Sept. 11).

Thank God I paint fast. 

I only had one backdrop left for Tamerlano (Haymarket Opera Company, Chicago), but it was a complicated composition with lots of ornamental detail. As my illness dragged on, it became a guessing game of “Can I paint this drop in — days?”  In the end, it took me three partial days, and I felt horrible with each brush stroke. The only thing that would have made this worse is if I had been painting in the Continental method. Fortunately, I was using a motorized paint frame. That meant I could minimize my overall movement.

Here is a picture of the finished Tamerlano backdrop (front and back). It was painted with distemper paint (pigment paste and diluted hide glue), and designed to function as a translucency, so it could subtly “glow” upstage.

On Sept. 12, 2024, I drove to Chicago with a carload of scenery for Haymarket Opera Company’s fall production Tamerlano (George Frederic Handel, 1724). The production was scheduled to coincide with the 300^th anniversary of the premiere.

As noted on their website, Haymarket Opera Company takes its name from both Chicago’s Haymarket Affair of 1886 which gave focus to the world-wide labor movement, and from the King’s Theatre in the Haymarket District of London where Handel produced his Italian operas. Their website states, “Haymarket Opera Company contributes to the diverse and culturally vibrant artistic community of Chicago and the Midwest through the historically informed presentation of opera and oratorio from the 17th and 18th centuries, including many Chicago and U.S. premieres. Since its founding in 2010, Haymarket has offered more than 30 productions using period instruments and historically informed staging conventions, shining a spotlight on many lesser known but quality pieces by a wide diversity of composers, sung and played by a combination of international stars and top regional talent.”

My earliest conversations with Haymarket Opera Company in 2021 discussed the creation of a stock scenery collection. Our intent was to slowly build scenic stock, one show at a time. The scenic design for L’Amant anonyme (June 2022), established our stylistic approach and paint medium.

We agreed that all the shows would be painted with distemper paint (picgment paste and diluted hide glue), as it truly supports the metamorphic nature of painted illusion for the stage.

I have continued to enlarge Haymarket’s stock scenery collection over the past few years with classical settings for Poppea (September 2022) and Egyptian décor for Marc’antonio e cleopatra (June 2023).  Tamerlano (September 2024) combines elements from each production, while adding Eastern tapestries and an Eastern courtyard setting to the stock.

For example, painted ornament was added to six Poppea wings, functioning as a unifying element between the newly-painted Tamerlano draperies with previously-painted L’Amant anonyme tapestries. New elements for this production include a backdrop, top border, two side wings, two tormentor covers, and four rolling profile pieces.

Haymarket Opera Company uses the Sasha and Eugene Jarvis Opera Hall at DePaul University. This building was formerly known as the School of Music Concert Hall, located at the south end of the Holtschneider Performance Center. It was recently renovated, reopening during the pandemic in 2020. Bad timing, as stag-house issues really were not identified until well after the install, when pandemic-related restrictions were lifted.

The auditorium, however, is perfect. The 160-seat house creates an incredibly intimate space for Baroque opera.

The stagehouse is a very challenging space, and I constantly curse the theatre consultants. Scenery cannot travel out of site, the wings are less than 6’-0” wide, and every line-set is motorized.  There are only a few open lines. For substantial set changes, soft goods are rolled and tied to battens, then slowly lowered during intermissions

 All difficulties aside, the Jarvis Opera Hall is a stunning venue to visit and watch a production. Tamerlano opened on Thursday, Sept. 19 and closed on Sunday, Sept. 22. A short run, but each performance was sold-out, and the show was recorded.

As each Haymarket opera loads in easily, and without substantial notes, I have ample time to explore Chicago during the day. My adventures always include a dear friend – Chicago Lyric Opera charge artist, Brian Traynor. In the past we have visited cemeteries, history centers, and historic buildings.  Last year, Traynor introduced me to Bernard Loyd and we visited The Forum in Bronzeville (a neighborhood on the south-side of Chicago). On July 18, 2023, Brian Traynor sent me a photograph with the text, “Guess what I’m looking at.” It was a Sosman & Landis signature on the corner of a, 1897 drop curtain.

I examined the drop curtain in person on Sept. 28. 2023. CLICK HERE for my full post about out visit. Our visit last year was documented by Block Club Chicago journalist, Jamie Nesbitt Golden, and photographer Colin Boyle.  CLICK HERE to read her Block Club Chicago article. 

This scenery collection was also the topic for my article published in Die Vierte Wand #012, entitled, “A Forum for Progress.” CLICK HERE for the full issue.

Traynor and I returned to The Forum this year on Sept. 19, 2024. I was supervising the proper rolling and storage of the Forum’s scenery collection . This meant removing the hardware and battens, then rolling and encapsulating each scene.

For the first time, this process was documented by someone other than myself. Asia Taylor brought in her film crew in to document the project. Taylor previously produced and directed a short film that gives insight into the history of Forum Hall. CLICK HERE to watch her short film.

She is also one of the storytellers for Build Bronzeville. Build Bronzeville is comprised of five closely-linked initiatives that merge social, economic, civic, and creative approaches to achieve comprehensive community development. It is using the historic neighborhood’s unique assets to restore commercial activity and revitalize area through entrepreneurship, cuisine, exciting events, and beautification.  

Prior to Traynor’s departure, he passed along a gift from his mentor, Jim Maronek – scenic fitches once used by Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934) and a package labeled “Open at your own risk.”

My research and career has circled around Jim Maronek for over three decades. It was his stewardship of many Thomas Moses artifacts made so much of my research possible.

Maronek who retrieved several of Moses’ artifacts when the family home in Oak Park sold – including an electric theatre model that is now part of the Sosman & Landis Collection at the Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas – Austin.

I have visited the Oak Park home of Thomas and Ella Moses several times. I also make an annual trip to Graceland Cemetery where Sosman & Landis are buried. These moments really help energize my ongoing research.

In 2023, Traynor and I stopped by Moses’ Oak Park home to meet to the new owners; they had contacted me when the property changed hands. I first visited the home on July 19, 2019, on a return trip from the East Coast. CLICK HERE for the post about that visit. The new owners are now collecting Moses’ work. Here are two of Moses’ paintings again hanging in the Oak Park Home

There were two other items on my agenda for the Chicago trip – visits to the Newberry Library and the Palette & Chisel Club. It was not until the fall of 2023 that I realized that both were located less than three blocks south of my hotel.  While walking to the Newberry to pick up my reader’s card, I passed by the Palette & Chisel Club building. Amazingly the gates were open! A new exhibit with works of was on display.

I have written quite a bit about the Palette & Chisel Club over the years. Founded in 1895, the Palette & Chisel Club was an association of artists and craftsmen for the purpose of work and study. The organization’s members were reported to be “all wage-workers, busy during the week with pencil, brush or chisel, doing work to please other people” (Inland Printer, 1896). But on Sunday mornings, they assembled for five hours to paint for themselves.

Many Sosman & Landis scenic artists belonged to the club, including Thomas G. Moses who joined in 1906. That year, Moses wrote, “I joined the Palette and Chisel Club at the Chicago Society of Artists.  I don’t know why, as I had so little time to give to pictures, but I live in hopes of doing something someday, that is what I have lived on for years, Hope, and how little we realize from our dreams of hope.  As the years roll by, I think one’s whole life is one continuous dream, unless we are wonderfully gifted, and fame drops on us while we sleep.” In 1906 the Palette and Chisel Club, the group consisted of sixty local painters, illustrators, and sculptors. On Jan. 6, 1906, the Chicago Tribune reported, the Palette & Chisel was “primarily a working club, being the oldest organization in the west” (p. 2).

The year before Moses joined the Palette & Chisel, the members purchased a summer retreat near fox lake. Initially, artists and their families camped in tents. In 1907, Moses wrote, “June 1^st, I made my first trip to the Palette and Chisel Club camp at Fox Lake, Ill.  Helped to put up the tent.  A new experience for me, but I enjoyed it.  I slept well on a cot.  Made a few sketches.  A very interesting place.  I don’t like the cooking in the tent and there should be a floor in the tent.  I saw a great many improvements that could be made in the outfit and I started something very soon.”

The next year, Moses gifted a house to the group. In 1908 he wrote, “I bought the portable house that we built years ago and at that time we received $300.00 for it.  I finally got it for $50.00, some bargain.  It cost $25.00 to remove it and we will put it up at Fox Lake in the Spring.  It has been used in Forest Park all summer to show The Day in the Alps.”

In 1909, Moses painted a view of the new building. It was gifted to my by his great-grandson, Stu Nicholls, in 2017.

In 1906, the club maintained a permanent exhibition in the clubrooms on the seventh floor of the Athenæum building. The group moved to 1012 N. Dearborn Street in the 1921. In the 1920s Moses submitted several articles to the Palette & Chisel Club newsletter. His series “Stage Scenery” started in September 1927.

After entering the building, I wandered about the main floor, recognizing artworks by several familiar names. 

Then I followed the signs to the office in the basement. It was time to contact someone and share the information that I have gathered over the years.  The basement office had a lovely mural that documents the history of the Club.

By the end of the weekend, I met with the current president, Stuart Fullerton, and applied for membership. The Palette & Chisel Academy of Fine Arts is an amazing resource for both emerging and established artists. The membership benefits, even for those out-of-state like myself, are quite impressive. They are part of Open House Chicago on October 19, 2024 . If you are in the area, I strongly encourage you to stop by.

Upon my return to Minneapolis, I hit the ground running. Yesterday, I finished painting the scenery for my next Gilbert & Sullivan Very Light Opera Co. design – The McAdo (a Scottish Take on The Mikado). It opens on Nov. 1. 2024, and runs for four weekends. CLICK HERE to order tickets.

Here is a sneak peak of the scenery.

I am returning to work on my upcoming book series – Sosman & Landis: Shaping the Landscape of American Theatre.

Have a great fall!

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

My past few posts explored the scenery collection at Normansfield’s historic amusement hall. Built in 1879, scenic artists who painted scenery for the stage included Richard Douglass, John T. Bull, and N. Hinchey.

This post explores the life and career of Nicolas Charles Hinchey (1864-1919), a 19^th-century scenic artist who specialized in painted illusion and mechanical effects for scenic spectacles. Hinchey is credited with Normansfield’s extant street scene.

A replica of Hinchey’s work now graces the Normansfield Theatre stage, with Hinchey’s original painting in storage.  

I have yet to examine the Hinchey’s street scene roll drop, or his signature on the backside, in person. Therefore, I solely relying on information and images about the roll drop that were published in John Earl’s Dr. Langdon Down’s Normansfield Theatre and a paper by Karen Thompson and Frances Lennard, entitled Normansfield Theatre Scenery: Materials and Construction Revealed Through Conservation.

Thompson and Lennard’s paper, they state, “The scenic painter ‘N. HINCHEY, SOUTH LONDON, PALACE LONDON ROAD, SE’ signed his name and address in his own hand on the back of the ‘Street Scene’ backdrop. His name appears only on this piece. The flats are painted on both sides so cannot definitely be attributed to Hinchey, but it is probable that his firm painted them as similar stylistic features have been used in the buildings. A depiction of a street scene backdrop appears in the earliest published drawing of the theatre when it was first opened, indicating this was possibly one of the theatre’s earliest sets (Earl 2010: 2).” They cite the drawing on page 2 in Dr. Langdon Down’s Normansfield Theatre by John Earl, first published in 1997.

The street scene composition in the 1879 Illustration is different than the one listed in the Normansfield Theatre Scenery Catalogue, featured on the cover of Dr. Langdon Down’s Normansfield Theatre.

I am skeptical that the 1879 illustration for the opening of Normansfield featured the work of a 15-yrs.-old scenic artist assistant. Previously, Normansfield theatrical entertainments credited John T. Bull with scenic contributions. Bull was the extremely well-known and well-respected scenic artist by the 1860s. Hinchey’s name did not make the news until 1882. That year,18-yrs.-old Hinchey assisted Richard Douglass and John Neville. Furthermore, Hinchey was not associated with the South London Palace Theatre until the fall of 1888.  Therefore, his signature on the back of the drop indicates that is was produced sometime after the fall of 1888. In fact, in 1893 Hinchey painted scenery for a pantomime at Normansfield. 

I am going to start with the actual design attributed to Hinchey at Normansfield before exploring the life and career of the artist. Many 19^th century stock scenery collections contained two types of street scene compositions, termed “Ancient” and “Modern.”  “Ancient Street Scenes” depicted the old world, a village square or street that could be the backdrop for plays dating from the time of Shakespeare. “Modern Street Scenes” were used for contemporary dramas and comedies, set in the 19^th century.

The street scene pictured in the 1879 illustration reminded me of the street scene delivered to the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado, that same year.  The only difference is that the Tabor Opera House street composition was painted on two shutters instead of a roll drop.

I have pieced together bits of information from historic records and newspaper reports to tell the tale Hinchey’s life and career. This one took a far longer than I expected, hence the delay. Many difficulties stemmed from multiple men with the same name. This always means that I must track a variety of individuals before identifying the correct family and region.

Amazingly, there were three men named Nicholas Hinchey in the same family, all living in London:

Nicholas Hinchey I (1831-1910), father, musician and shoemaker

Nicholas Hinchey II (1864-1919), his son, a scenic artist

Nicholas Hinchey III (1890-?), his grandson, a scenic artist

In newspaper reports and historic records, Hinchey was also misspelled as “Hinchley.” For example, and advertisement for The Indian Mutiny, published in Chatham’s Medway News on Dec. 26, 1891, noted “New scenery and Original Effects by Mr. N. Hinchley and Henry Adolphus Payne” (p. 1). This always makes research a challenge. However, in addition to human error, there are additional problems that I encounter with transcription software. As I have noted in the past, various letters are not always transcribed as such. For example, “h” will become “li.” “S” will become “5.” So, the word “Shy” may be read by the software “5liy.”

When doing any research, I intentionally employ misspellings and a combination pf software errors. While searching for articles about Hinchey, I used “lincliey” [hinchey]. Despite these additional steps, it still beats the alternative of slowly scrolling through old newspapers – page by page.  There is no way that I could piece together the lives and careers of scenic artists – especially those working outside of my US State – if I were solely relying on original sources in archives and rare book rooms.

Here is the tale of scenic artist, Nicholas Hinchey….

Born in 1864, Nicolas Charles Hinchey (II) was the son of Nicholas Hinchey (III) and Margaret Catherine Hinchey (1834-1910). He grew up in a whirlwind of music, as he was from a musically-gifted family. Both father and paternal grandfather (Walter William Hinchey, 1803-1870) were musicians, as were his two uncles, William Jr. and Walter Hinchey.

Nicholas (II) was one of five Hinchey children born to Nicholas (I) and Margaret Hinchey: Margaret Kate Hinchey (1862-1946), Catherine “Kate” M. Hinchey (1866-1940), Nicholas Hinchey (1864-1919), Walter Hinchey (1868-1947), and Charles Henry Hinchey (1872-1949).

By1870, the Hinchey family moved to Shoreditch. Here is a map of the three primary locations where scenic artist Nicholas Hinchey (II) lived and worked – Shoreditch, Bethnal Green, Hackney, and Tower Heights.

The 1871 Census listed Nicholas Hinchey (I) as head of household and a Professor of Music. This was the same year that smallpox plagued the Shoreditch community. Sometime between 1871 and 1881 the Hinchey family moved from Shoreditch to Bethnal Green. This was not a great distance, only a 38-minute walk.

In 1881, the Hinchey household was located at 20 St. James Road in Bethnal Green, London. Nicholas Hinchey (I) was listed as a “sole-sewer” in the shoe trade. The Hinchey family was living in a trade neighborhood, home to dozens of shoe and boot manufacturers. Hinchey’s younger brothers, Walter and Charles Henry, also began in the shoe and boot manufacturing trade. However, in 1881, they were simply listed as “scholars,” ages 11 and 8. Interestingly, nothing is listed for Nicholas Hinchey (II) in the 1881 census report.

“N. Hinchey” was already working as a scenic artist in 1881. On Jan. 1, 1882, he was credited with the scenery for a Christmas pantomime, working alongside Richard Douglass and John Neville at the National Standard Theatre, Shoreditch. At the time, he was 18 yrs. old. The fact that Nicholas Hinchey was mentioned by name, alongside two other well-known scenic artists, suggests that he significantly contributed to the scenic portion of the show.  If he were merely working as an assistant, the article would have only listed the names of Douglass and Neville, or “Douglass, Neville and assistant.” Based on standard practices of the 19^th century scenic art trade, aspiring artists began training between the ages of 12 and 16. Hinchey was likely training as a scenic artist in 1878, possibly at the Standard Theatre in Shoreditch.

On Jan. 1, 1882, The Sunday People credited scenic artists R. Douglas, J. Neville and N. Hinchey with the scenery for Sinbad the Sailor at the Standard Theatre (p. 7). Richard Douglass was the subject of yesterday’s post, as he also painted scenery for the Normansfield Theatre. Richard’s brother, John Douglass, was the author of the pantomime. Of the production, the article reported, “The scene of the pantomime proper opens with a representation of a seaside village, where Sinbad being refused the hand of Polly, resolves to go to sea. The spectator next sees the cabin of the Lively Polly, where the threads of the story are again taken up. Gun drill is gone through and a grand nautical ballet, in which every nationality is represented, is indulged in, to the delight of the audience. The vessel strikes on the Loadstone Rock, and founders; but the hero and his friends are rescued by a steamer in a scene which alone will render this pantomime popular. The vessel not only glides easily and gracefully on to the stage but turns completely round and goes off again. Some capital business and fooling take place on the Tum Tum Islands, where the East-enders will derive some curious information with reference to marriage laws and customs. To this success an interesting panorama, and scenes representing the Valley of Jewels (in which is termed a ‘prismatic ballet’ takes place, the dresses of the dancers creating a fine. Affect), and Eastern slave mart, &c., leading up to the transformation scene, which is termed a Vision of the Intense and Realms of the Utterly Utter, a really splendid scene deserving a better tile. The scenery throughout is all that could be wished…”

Hinchey continued to work in the area and began to make a name for himself at three music halls by the mid-1880s. He became associated with the Parthenon Theatre of Varieties, (Greenwich), the Canterbury Theatre (Lambeth), the Paragon Theatre (Mile End). Charles Crowder and George Adney Payne were the Proprietors of several music halls that included the Paragon Theatre of Varieties  and Canterbury Theatre of Varieties (The Era 25 Dec 1886, p. 13).

With relatively stable employment, Hinchey was able to wed. On Dec. 1, 1884, Nicholas Hinchey married Susannah Skaggs Burns (1863-1918) at Holy Trinity, Dalston, Beechwood Road, in Hackney. Hinchey was listed as a scenic artist, living at 192 Victoria Park Road in South Hackney, whereas Burns was living at 63 Holly Street. The couple celebrated the birth of two sons: Nicholas Charles Hinchey (1886) and Horace Arthur Hinchey (1890).

The Paragon Theatre of Varieties opened in May 1885, coinciding with Hinchey’s listing as a resident artist for the venue. Amazingly I located two Paragon Theatre programs that listed Hinchey as the resident scenic artist. This places Hinchey as the scenic artist there from 1885 to 1887.

Here are a few articles that note Hinchey’s association with Crowder and Payne’s two music halls during this time:

Parthenon Theatre of Varieties:

On Sept. 5, 1885, The Era listed N. Hinchey as the scenic artist for The Naughty Dustman at the Parthenon Theatre of Varieties, Stockwell-street, Greenwich. At the time, A. A. Hurley was the sole proprietor and manager, with A. R. Hurley as the acting manager.

Canterbury Theatre of Varieties:

On Nov. 21, 1885, The Era announced that a “new palatial Interior” was painted expressly for the occasion by N. Hinchey” to celebrate the third anniversary of the proprietorship of Messrs. Crowder and Payne at the Canterbury. (p. 10)

In 1886, Hinchey was still painting for The Canterbury. On Jan. 2, 1886, The Era mentioned Hinchey’s scenic art in an entertainment called Twenty Minutes with the Ancients, with twenty classically draped and classically posed ladies “in a beautiful painted scene, ‘Old Roman Ruins,’ which reflects the highest credit on the skill of the artist, Mr. N. Hinchey” (p. 10).

Other Canterbury Theatre of Varieties show with scenery painted by Hinchey in 1886 include The Devil Bird (The Standard, 30 Aug 1886, p. 1) and Across the Pond (The Standard, 20 Oct 1886, p. 1). Across the Pond was advertised as an “Absurdity with Magnificent scenery by Mr. N. Hinchey. The Castle Garden by Moonlight, the Arrival of the Steam Ship Grecian Monarch.”

In 1886, Nicholas and Susannah celebrated the birth of their first son, Nicholas Charles Hinchey (III).

I am going to pause for a moment and look at the 1880s Music Halls where Hinchey was working, especially those managed by Crowder and Payne. They were quite controversial and a target by clergy. A leaflet, entitled This Way to the Pit of Hell, was written by Frederick Nicholas Charrington of the Tower Hamlet and handed out in front of Lusby’s Music Hall in London’s Mile End Road. Charrington’s unwanted activities Payne to throw bucket of red ochre on Charrington. This was likely a pot of distemper paint, mixed by his scenic. The controversy continued over the years, and in 1885, Crowder and Payne brought Charrington to court, alleging that his activities constituted a public nuisance and were slanderous. There is a very interesting article by Bob Davenport, entitled George Adney Payne: Music-hall guv-nor that describes the event.

Despite continued controversary at Hinchey’s various places of employment, he continued to gain popularity for his scenic art. 1887 was an especially busy year as he repeatedly painting of scenes for a series of sketches that featured the Leopolds.

Here are a few articles that mention about Hinchey’s work in 1887 and 1888, before he became associated with the South London Palace Theatre:

On Jan. 15, 1887, The Era reported that the Leopolds’ The Terrible Boys sketch included “new scenery by N. Hinchey, Tennyson and O’Gorman” (p. 12). The sketch was still being performed that fall. On Oct.1, 1887, The Era mentioned Hinchey’s scenery at The Paragon in the Leopold Troupe’s The Terrible Boys (p. 10): “The scene in which the wild revels take place is prettily painted by Mr. Hinchey and serves the purpose admirably.”

On Feb. 26, 1887, The Era reported that the Leopolds’ Claud sketch featured “new scenery by N. Hinchey (p. 12).

On March 5, 1887, The Era reported, “The new scenery, which has been supplied by N. Hinchey, says much for the artistic ability if that gentleman” (p. 9).

On April 9, 1887, The Era reported the eccentric sketch of The Magic Flute supported by the pantomime troupe with “new scenery by N. Hinchey” for the Easter Holidays (p. 12).

On Oct. 29, 1887, The Era published an advertisement for the Paragon Theatre of Varieties for “A Nautical Musical Sketch The Seaside Holiday introducing Harry White, Elsie Phyllis &c. New scenery by N. Hinchey” (p. 12).

On Jan. 14, 1888, The Era described Hinchey’s scenic contributions for the Naughty Jack sketch, reporting, “Special praise is due to Mr. N. Hinchey’s capital scenery, Considering the brevity of the sketch, the elaborate and complete  mise-en-scène, the artistic execution, and the tasteful and ingenious lighting of the two stage pictures, notably the street scene which is last exhibited, are surprisingly good; and the mechanical change from the interior of the prison works with delightful smoothness” (p. 15).

One of his last productions at the Paragon was during the summer of 1888. On June 28, 1888, an advertisement in The Era for On Guard featured “New Scenery by N. Hinchey” (p. 1). On July 3, 1888, The Standard listed Hinchey’s scenes – Scene 1. England in Danger; “On Guard” before Sebastool. Scene 2, England’s Reward; The Workhouse of Death; Country Churchyard in Winter” (p. 1).

Hinchey established his own painting rooms at Cannon-place, Mile-end-road. This address appeared in The Era advertisements in the fall of 1888. On Sept 15 and 29, 1888, Hinchey published an advertisement in The Era (p. 3). It stated, “Mr. Nicholas Hinchey, Scenic Artist, late of Canterbury and Paragon Theatres, by permission of Mr. William Lusby, is now prepared to accept Contracts, Large or Small, Theatres, Music Halls, and Amateurs, stocked with Scenery of every description. Small. Stages built and fitted with every appliance. Address, Nicholas Hinchey, Royal Foresters’, Cambridge-road, Mile-end, E., London; or Painting Room, Cannon-place, Mile-end-road.”

On Sept. 22, 1888, The Era listed Nicholas Hinchey as “Resident Scenic Artist” at Royal Foresters’ Palace of Varieties, Cambridge-Road, Mile-End, with William Lusby as the proprietor.

Hinchey was also painting scenery for other venues too. For example, on Nov. 5, 1888, The Era reported “Six splendid scenes from the brush of the young and talented N. Hinchey” for the Belmont’s New Sebright Amusement Temple, Hackney-Road” (p. 12). The article about the inaugural opening listed “Mrs. J. J. Poole, South London Music Hall,” as one of the “distinguished patrons.” Hinchey was later credited with scenery for Danger on the Line at the New Sebright Amusement Temple. On Feb. 2, 1889, The Era noted, “special scenery and limelight effects by N. Hinchey, Esq.” (p. 14).

On April 20, 1889, The Era reported, “Belmont’s New Sebright is the brightest Star Show in the whole universe. Each week beaming a Copious Catalogue of New and Novel Acts, with Scenes of Sumptuous Splendor from the brush of N. Hinchey, and Satisfactorily Set and Struck by a very Smart Small-Soda Swallowing Stage Steersman, one Hickman, whose initials are C. D. (not Seedy)” (p. 12).

Hinchey was also associated with the South London Palace of Varieties in Lambeth that fall. On Sept. 8, 1888, The Era reported, “New scenery by N. Hinchey” for a new sketch Danger’s Call at the South London Palace, d-road, S. E. – Proprietress Mrs. J. J. Poole” (p. 12). Mrs. J. J. Poole assumed management of the theatre after her husband’s passing in 1882. Hinchey also painted scenery for Sloperius that summer. He was credited in an article published in The Sunday People on June 16, 1889 (p. 8).

In 1888, Hinchey began working with Joseph Soames. The two painted scenery for the Surrey Theatre’s Christmas Pantomime, Dick Whittington and His Cat. On Dec. 28, 1889, The Era reported, “A brief sketch of the spectacular effects of the pantomime must here suffice. The second scene, East Chepe in the Olden Time, is an elaborate and artistic set; and the view from Highgate Hill (scene four) created an undeniable call, which had to be answered by the smiling appearance of Mr. George Conquest. While Dick sleeps, he is supposed to be treated by the fairies to a dream of delight, in which he fancies himself in a pleasurance inhabited by elves representing butterflies and insects and carrying garlands of beautiful flowers. In the London Dock scene, a “practicable” vessel sailed from the quay, the eight scene, representing a tropical forest, reflects as does all the scenery, great credit upon Messrs. J. Soames, N. Hinchey and their assistants” (p. 8). Joseph Soames (1847-1918) was another link between Hinchey and Richard Douglass. In 1886, Soames painted scenery with Douglass, G. Blake and assistants for Jack and the Beanstalk at the Standard Theatre (The Era 21 Dec 1886, p. 4).

Born in Stepney, London, Joseph Soames was already working as a scenic artist in the 1860s. He was listed as such in the 1871 Census report.  That year, Soames was credited with the “Magnificent Champion Transformation Scene” for Dick Whittington and His Cat; or, Discord, War, Famine, and Harlequin Peace, Good Humour, and Plenty at the Garrick Theatre, Leman-street, Whitechapel (The Era 1 Jan 1871, p. 12). At the time, his work was featured alongside that of G. A. Baxter, Mr. Burris and W. Campbell (assistant). In 1889, Soames advertised as “the Acme of Scenic Effect” (The Era 28 Sept 1889, p. 12).

Over the years, he continued his association with the Surrey Theatre, passing along his skills to his youngest son, Alfred James Soames (1884-1920). The 1901 Census listed Alfred as a 16-yrs.-old apprentice to Joseph Soames in Seaford, Sussex.

In 1892, Hinchey was still painting with Soames. On Dec. 31, 1892, The Era credited Hinchey, J. Soames, and C. Williams with scenery for Puss in Boots at the Surrey Theatre, reporting “Messrs. Soames, Hinchey, and Williams have painted some very effective scenes” (p. 8). On Jan 1, 1893, The Era heralded their scenic contributions, especially the transformation scene, entitled The Home of Coralina. The Era article reported, “The scenes representing a mill and village inn, a weird glen, a wood and lake, a prison, the wonderful house built by the Jack introduced into the story, a golden palace, and ogre’s stronghold, and the transformation scene called “The Home of Coralina,” are highly credible to the artists, Messrs. J. Soames, N. Hinchey, and C. Williams, while their attractions are enhanced by the clever property, mechanical, and illuminating effects introduced into them by Messrs. T. and H. Major, F. Gaydon, and W. Dines.” I have yet to track down the scenic art career or C. Williams; more later is I uncover something.

Despite accepting a variety of other projects throughout the region, Hinchey maintained a close association with the South London Palace. Here are a few productions mentioned in newspapers between 1890 and 1895:  

Conn, an Irish sketch in four scenes for the Easter Holidays, with “scenery and new effects by N. Hinchey” (Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper April 6, 1890, p. 6)

Balaclava, a “sensational military monologue” with “splendid scenery by N. Hinchey (The Era Aug. 8, 1891, p. 12).

Night Alarm featuring “new scenery by N. Hinchey,” (The Era 5 Sept. 1891 p 12.)

Mepho; or, Faust After Date with “new scenery by N. Hinchey, Lime effects by J. Jarrat; Machinist, A. Kennard” (The Era Oct. 24, 1891, p. 14).

A Terrible Night, Paul Martinetti’s pantomime“with special new scenery and effects by N. Hinchey” (Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper, p. 8).

The Sights of London (Mr. Charles Godfrey in a series of new songs) with special new scenery and special effects by N. Hinchey (The Sunday People 7 Feb 1891 p. 8)

Robert Macaire “with new and beautiful scenery by N. Hinchey” (The Era 20 Feb 1892, p. 14)

The Squire of Haslemere (by Vento, the modern ventriloquist)“with Scenery by N. Hinchey, Esq. (The Era 2 Apr 1892 p 26)

The Harvest of Sin, in five tableaux, with “scenery and special effects by N Hinchey” (The Sunday People 10 Jul 1892 p. 8)

Inkerman (starring Charles Godfrey) with scenery “specially sketched and painted by N. Hinchey for the South London Palace,” representing No. 11 Ward in Chelsea Hospital (The Era 30 Jul 1892 p. 12)

Adventures on a Houseboat with “scenery by N. Hinchey” (Sunday Dispatch 25 Sept 1892 p. 8)

The Tower Bridge (R. Gurney Sketch Company) with “Scenery by N. Hinchey” (The Era 2 March 1895, p. 26)

In 1890, the Hincheys celebrated the birth of another child, Horace Arthur Hinchey. Horace was born in Whitechapel, Tower Hamlets, on April 18, 1890. His birth was listed in the Civil Registration Index for the second quarter of that year.

That year, the Hinchey also painted scenery for the Hull Christmas Pantomime. On Dec. 24, 1890, the Hull Daily Mail included an article about Little Red Riding Hood  at the Theatre Royal on Boxing Night: “We have reason for stating that the scenery, which has been painted by Messrs. Jules Camus and N. Hinchey, is most elaborate in character” (p. 3); On Jan. 3, 1891, The Era  reported, “The tale, which is on the old familiar lines, is depicted in eleven scenes, designed and painted by Jule Camus and N. Hinchey” (p. 18). Hinchey returned to the next year. On Jan 2, 1892, The Era listed Jules Camus and N. Hinchey as the scenic artists for the Christmas pantomime Robinson Crusoe (p. 19).

In 1891, the Census listed Nicholas Hinchey as a scenic artist and sculptor, living with his family at 5 Cannon Place in Whitechapel, London. Members of his household included 28-yrs.-old wife Susannah and two sons, Nicholas C. (5 yrs.) and Horace A. (1 yrs.).

On Oct. 3, 1891, The Era described a new entertainment at The Foresters’, reporting, “Mr. William Lusby’s old-established and well-patronized theatre of varieties in the Cambridge-road, Mile-end… The Yard Arm…“The scenery, for which N. Hinchey is responsible, gave every satisfaction” (p. 16).

A week later, Hinchey’s scenic art was mentioned in a newspaper advertisement that described a new stage effect. On Oct. 8, 1892, The Era published an advertisement for the “Ubiquitous M. George Lupino.” It reported, “Nineteenth week as Leporella, Don Juan’s Servant, Alhambra Theatre. South London Palace as the SEA MONSTER. Come, see, mark, learn, copy. The most Realistic Ship ever produced on any stage in Europe. See how a Practical Picturesque Mechanical Trap scene should be made and used. Modeled and designed by a Pantomimist who understands Geometry, Scale, and Perspective. A Hint to those Great Little People who Talk about Inventing and Designing, and yet cannot sketch at all. Painted by N. Hinchey, Built by R. Wilkinson. I George Lupino, claim the above as original in construction from end to end, and challenge inspection and contradiction. Agent, Warner” (p. 26).

Hinchey’s reputation was continuing to spread throughout the region.

In 1892, Hinchey delivered scenery to the Normansfield Amusement Hall. On Jan. 7, 1893, The Era announced “The Genesta A. D. C. On Thursday evening at Normansfield, Hampton Wick, the members of this amateur dramatic club performed for the first time, an original ‘nautical pantomime,’ entitled Y’lang Y’lang, the Fair Maid of Too-Bloo…The libretto and lyrics were written by Mr. G. Manchester Cohen, the music composed by Mr. John W. Ivimey, and the pantomime arranged and produced by Mr. Peter Davay…This production of a Christmas piece. With its elaborate scenery and costly dresses. Was a bold undertaking for amateurs, and they are to be congratulated upon the undoubted success which attended the performance…The scenery painted by Mr. N. Hinchey, was admirable, and the dresses and properties all that could be wished for” (p. 9). It is possible that this was the same year that Hinchey painted and signed the street scene for the Normansfield Theatre.

It was about this same time that newspapers start mention the scenic art firm of “N. Hinchey & Co.” A name that appeared for only a year. On Jan. 14, 1893, The Ear published an advertisement for the touring production of The Indian Mutiny, noting “Magnificent scenery for every Act by N. Hinchey and Co.” (p. 4). On Feb 17, 1894, The Era published an advertisement for A Military Blunder with “special scenery and effects by N. Hinchey & Co. (p. 27).

On May 19, 1894, The Era published an advertisement for The Two Hussars featuring Mr. Harry Bruce’s Company, with “Four sets of Magnificent Scenery (by N. Hinchey) carried, portraying Balaclava, Sebastopol, and Environs” (p. 4). On March 26, 1898, The Era reported, “The success of the visit has been through and complete; and the attraction of The Two Hussars seems as strong and steady as ever. Especially stimulating have proved to be the scenes in the second act, including views of the battle plains and the French and Russian camps, the blowing up of the bridge, military quarters in the Crimea, the Valley of Death, and the Charge of the Light Brigade, in which Trooper Holland, No. 1,543, D. Troop, 11^th Hussars, one of the actual survivors of the “six hundred” in the celebrated exploit, appears each evening. For these, for the correct view of the town and harbour of Balaclava, and for the whole effects, Mr. N. Hinchey, the scenic artist, deserves warm praise, while the superintendence of Mr. Harry Bruce has given smoothness and completeness to the production” (p. 10).

On August 22, 1896, The Era listed that new scenery for The Indian Mutiny was traveling with new scenery “painted from photographs by Nicholas Hinchey, Lionel Hart, and Richard Douglass, and the picture of the Ruined Mosque on the Mountain Pass, with its warm glow and cleverly suggested architectural detail, may be picked out as one of the remarkable examples of stage brush work” (p. 9).

By 1897, public mention of Hinchey as a scenic artist became less frequent.

On Aug 4, 1900, The Era published an advertisement for The Mariners of England; or, the Days of Nelson, reporting, “The Stirring Patriotic Olympic Success, now in the Third Year of Tour. Emphatic Success this week at Southend, New Plant of Scenery being prepared by Mr. Nicholas Hinchey” (p. 20).

I was able to locate only a handful of articles about painting projects for N. Hinchey from this point forward.

On Jan. 22, 1901, Coventry Evening Telegraph published an article about the Pantomime at the Opera House describing Wilfred Cotton and Le Butt’s version of Babes in the Wood, incorporated with incidents from Who Killed Cock Robin? (p. 2), with scenery by Messrs. G. Miller and N. Hinchey. In 1901, Hinchey was visiting at 42 Drewton St, Bradford West, Yorkshire. He was listed as a visitor and theatrical scenic artist. Other “visitors” included actor George Croft, Theatrical Property Manager Ralph Rawle, Theatrical carpenter Frank Smith, and many others. It appears that he was traveling with a company at the time.

On Jan. 11, 1902, the Folkstone Herald mentioned Hinchey’s scenic contributions to the touring production of Beauty and the Beast from the Royal County Theatre, Kingston-on-Thames. The article reported, “The graceful old fairytale is set out with commendable skill and clarity and presented in tableaux of singular charm and beauty by a company remarkable for genuine dramatic ability. The scenery is by such well-known artists as T. Miller, Walter Hann, Nicholas Hinchey, George Miller, etc.” (p. 12).

The first few years of the twentieth century prompted change in the Hinchey home, possibly caused by Susannah Hinchey’s poor health. Something happened, and I have yet to figure out the specifics. However, in 1906, Hinchey’s wife became destitute and was transferred from one poorhouse to another. On a few years earlier, their youngest son, was enrolled in boarding school.

Horace A. Hinchey was admitted into the Olga Street School in Tower Hamlets, Bethnal Green, dated February 24, 1902.  Records list that H. A. Hinchey was born on April 18, 1890, and that his father was Nicholas Hinchey (Scenic Artist). Hinchey’s previous school was located on Chrisenhale Rd. Furthermore, Hinchey’s residence was listed as 16 McThurst Rd. Olga Street Board School was established in 1874, with a student body of 649 children (324 boys, 325 girls) and 418 infants. The school was enlarged in 1881 to accommodate approximately 1,500 children, with further improvements made in 1898.

By the summer of 1906, Susannah Hinchey was placed at the poorhouse in Polar. She is listed in London’s Selected Poor Law Removal and Settlement records, dated June 2, 1906. Now, I was unfamiliar with this type of law and settlement. The Poor Law was a system that grouped parishes into unions, each with its own workhouse, to reduce the cost of caring for the poor.

Susannah Hinchey’s orders of removal to the Guardians of the Poor of Poplar, Poor Law Union, in the County of London, reported, “That Susannah Hinchey is the wife of Nicholas Hinchey. That prior to August 1900 the said Nicholas Hinchey resided for a term of three years at 59 Venue Street, 29 Nairn Street and Elsewhere in the Parish of Bromely St. Leonard and in the Popular Union, in such a manner, and under such circumstances, in each of such years, as would in accordance with the several statutes in that behalf, render him irremovable therefrom and settled therein.” Her record stated, “Susannah Hinchey, aged 43 years has come to inhabit and is now inhabiting in the said Parish of St, Matthew, Bethnal Green, not having gained a legal Settlement therein, nor produced  a Certificate acknowledging a Settlement elsewhere, nor being exempt from removal by any provision of the Law, and that she is now actually chargeable to the said Parish, and is now receiving relief therefrom, and that Parish of Bromeley St. Leonard in the Poplar Poor Law Union in the County of London is the place of her last legal Settlement. I, the said the Magistrate, upon the due proof thereof, as well as by examination of a Witness upon oath and upon due consideration of the premises, do adjudge the complaint to be true, and that such relief is made necessary by the sickness of the said Susannah Hinchey which sickness I am satisfied will produce in her permanent disability; and that the place of last legal Settlement of the said Susannah Hinchey is in the Parish of Bromley St. Leonard which is comprised in your said Union. These are therefore in His Majesty’s name to require and order you, said Guardians of the Poor of the said Parish of St. Matthew, Bethnal Green, or some or one of you, or some proper person of persona to be employed by you, at such time, and in such manner as by law is provided and directed in that behalf, to remove and convey the said Susannah Hinchey from and out of your said Parish to the said Poplar Poor Law Union, and her to deliver, together with this Order, or a duplicate, or a true copy hereof at the Workhouse, or unto the Guardians of the Poor there, or one of them, who are or is hereby required to receive and provide for her according to Law.”

I have yet to locate Susannah’s departure from Poplar, yet the 1911 census listed her residence in Hackney.  This was only one year after her father-in-law’s passing.

On Dec. 22, 1910, Nicholas Hinchey (I) passed away and was buried at Chingford Mount Cemetery. Chingford is in the London Borough of Waltham Forest. The gravestone states, “Loving Memory of Nicholas Hinchey who passed away December 22^nd, 1910, Aged 79 Years. Lord All Pitying, Jesu Blest: Grant Him Thine Eternal Rest.”  The grave also contains the remains of his son, Nicholas Hinchey (II), and Daughter Margaret Le Croissette.

The 1911 Census listed Susanna living at 2 Frampton Park Road in Southeast Hackney. Her son, scenic artist Nicholas Charles Hinchey (III), lived with her. This means that by 1911, scenic art projects credited to N. Hinchey may be the work of Nicholas Hinchey (II) and Nicholas Hinchey (III).

In 1914, 28-yrs.-old “scene-painter,” Nicholas Charles Hinchey (III) married 21-yrs.old Annie “Elizabeth” Elizabeth was the daughter of John Charles Willis, who worked as a groom. The couple was married at the Parish Church of at Saint Alban in Streatham Park (Lambeth) in the county of Surrey.

Willis was the daughter of John C. and Mary E. Willis, of Wandsworth. At the time, both listed their residence as 105 Eardley Road (this was very unusual). Their marriage was witnessed by Susannah Hinchey and Charles Phillip Chamberlaine, and registered in Wandsworth, London. Because this event occurred between census reports, I have yet to locate Susannah’s address at this time, or any mention of Nicholas Hinchey (II).

The same year that his son was married, “N. Hinchey” was credited with scenic work at the Palace Theatre in Glasgow. On August 4, 1914, Glasgow’s Daily Record reported that the Palace Theatre was “Redecorated with Entirely New Scenery and Lighting Effects Designed and Painted by Mr. N. Hinchey” (p. 4). I am unsure whether this was the work of father or son.

There were only a few more mentions of scenic art by N. Hinchey during the war years. On May 12, 1918. The Stirling Observer (Stirling, Scotland) reported that N. Hinchey painted scenery for Cheer-O!  at the Olympia. On August 28, 1918, The Perthshire Advertiser published an article about the new spectacular spy play, Carry on at Perth Theatre (p. 3). Special scenery was by N. Hinchey.

Nicholas Hinchey (II) passed away on Dec. 18, 1919, at the age of 55 years. He was buried at Chingford Mount Cemetery with his father, Nicholas Hinchey (I) in 1919. He passed away at St. Marks Hospital City Road.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

“Richard Douglass, Painting Rooms, Next Grand Theatre, London N.” appears on several wings at the Normansfield Theatre.

He painted over several woodland scenes that were originally delivered by J. T. & G. Bull to the stage. These pieces were repainted sometime after 1891; as 1891 was the year that Douglass moved his painting rooms from Tottenham Street to the Grand Theatre in Islington.

Samuel “Richard” Douglass was a prolific scene painter, theatre manager, and comedian. His parents were theatre manager John Douglass (Sr.) and Jane Isabella Goodwin. John (1814-1874) married Jane Isabella Goodwin (1816-1881) on Feb. 11, 1835. The two celebrated the birth of their first child, John Thomas, in 1842, with Samuel Richard Douglass arriving two years later on March 17, 1844. Born in Lambeth, Surrey, England, he was named after his paternal grandfather, Samuel Douglass (b. 1780).

The year after Richard’s birth, John Douglas began managing the National Standard Theatre in Shoreditch. For geographical context, Shoreditch is located in the London Borough of Hackney, considered to be part of the East End.

This theatre, also known as The Standard, was first built in 1837 on the site of the Royal Standard Public House and Pleasure Gardens. It was located opposite the Eastern Railway Station. The original structure was rebuilt in 1844, absorbing an adjacent site, with twelve houses. The new structure was home to not only a stage, but also a circus arena.

On May 17, 1845, The Illustrated London News  reported, “The East-enders have now their Amphitheatre, or Cirque Olympique, for equestrian performances, which the proprietors of the New Standard Theatre have just provided for, in a novel and ingenious manner…The interior is of the horseshoe form, and a domed roof…The proscenium is 30 feet wide by 30 feet in height; the auditory has a circle of ten private, and fourteen public boxes, which, with the pit and gallery, will accommodate 2200 persons” (p.320). The stage and proscenium boxes were built to recede, thus revealing could shift, revealing a circus ring that could be filled with water.

The theatre became a training ground for his children. John and Jane Douglass celebrated the birth of five other children arrived over the years: Henry Charles (b. 1848), Alice Clara (b. 1850), Frederick Jerrold (b. 1852), Arthur Douglas (b. 1857) and Agnes Margaret (b. 1858). Then network of theatrical support continued as the family expanded. Three of his five sons followed in their father’s footsteps: John Jr., Richard, and Arthur.

I am going to start with a few excerpts from his father’s obituary entitled, “Death and Memoir of Mr. John Douglass.” Published on Feb. 8, 1874, in The Era, the obituary reported, “Acting under the advice, and profiting by the influence, his uncle, William Douglass, was the gas engineer at Covent-garden Theatre, he obtained, at the age of eleven, the envied eighteenpence a night at that time given to the small auxiliaries who appeared in Pantomimes. Farley, the famous inventor and arranger of these spectacular productions, speedily chose him out from a throng of other urchins as his favorite “Imp.”  Whatever little John Douglass did he was sure to throw his heart into, and, indeed on one occasion, when he appeared (April 12^th, 1826) as one of the Sprites of the Storm in Weber’s grand romantic opera of Oberon, this excessive zeal nearly brought him into serious tribulation. Fortunately, the mask he wore enabled him to escape the consequence of his disregarding stage directions, and on Boxing Night, 1826, when the Pantomime of Riquet with the Tuft was produced at Covent-garden Farley made a special point of selecting “clever little Jack” for the principal Turnspit Dog in the Magic Kitchen. At this Theatre, studying attentively in the best Theatrical school, Master John Douglass remained till he grew up to manhood, and he then began to try how far the lessons he had acquired would give him the position to which his aspirations tended. There were several small, but well-managed, Theatres at this period, unrecognized by the Magistrates, endeavoring to break through the strict cordon of the Lord Chamberlain, and to one of these unlicensed Theatres, in Westminster, Mr. John Douglas attached himself. He was an excellent dancer, a good pantomimist, a proficient broad swordsman, and one of the best of stage sailors… It may also be noted that Mr. John Douglas played with great success some of his nautical parts at Drury-lane in the early time of Mr. E. T. Smith’s management… All these acquisitions made him immensely popular, and having now to rely more than ever on his own resources – for his worthy uncle, William Douglass, had been killed by a terrible gas explosion at Covent Garden Theatre, November 18, 1828 – he worked with redoubled energy. After going through a round of characters in nautical melodramas which caused his name to be prominently brought forward, he became the obscurity, and here he continued several years, advancing his own interests and that of the property. In 1845, Mr. John Douglas became Manager of the Standard Theatre, 204 High-street, Shoreditch, and after seven years afterwards he became possessed of the freehold. In this management he succeeded Nelson Lee, who then went to the City of London. Recognizing the capabilities of the establishment, and the requirements of the educated theatrical taste of playgoers in that populous district, Mr. John Douglass conceived the possibility of paying, with remuneration to himself, the very largest salaries to distinguished artiste’s previously only seen at the West-end…The Theatre which he had raised to such a pitch of unexampled prosperity was turned down on the morning of Sunday, October 21, 1866; but, undaunted by this disaster, Mr. John Douglass raised an infinitely superior structure on the site, and purchasing some freeholds of some adjacent properties, the energetic Lessee gave to the East-end of London the advantage of the largest Theatre in the Metropolis. The magnificent new building, which remains as a monument to his enterprise, was opened with a grand inaugural operatic concert on Wednesday, December 18^th, 1867, and astounded the public with its four tiers of boxes and ninety private boxes. This building was constructed entirely without architect’s or builder’s plans. The points of the site were practically fixed, and the theatre measurements traced on the ground itself. The shape of the Theatre (so much admired) was made in bricks on the ground of the old Theatre by the late Mr. Douglass himself, and with vast seating accommodation were due to Mr. John Douglass’ practical suggestions. From 1833 to 1845 Mr. John Douglas was Manager successively of the Gravesend Theatre, the old City Theatre in Milton-street, the Orange-street Theatre, Chelsea; the Clarence (now Cabinet), King’s-cross; the Yorkshire Stingo (now the Marylebone Baths), the old East London, the new Queen’s, Windmill-street, Haymarket (now the Argyle Rooms), and the Westminster, as before stated. In 1857 he also became Manager of the Pavilion Theatre and carried on that speculation conjointly with the Standard for fourteen years. His last appearance on the stage was in Ben the Boatswain, May 1869. Not only as actor, manager and proprietor, but also dramatic author, Mr. John Douglass deserves to be remembered for both the Marylebone and the Standard he contributed several effective pieces. As may be imagined from his early  training, he had valuable knowledge of stage effect, and his arrangement of pantomimic action and his invention of changeable devices made the Standard Pantomime always exceedingly popular and amusing. Among the family left to mourn his loss his sons – one the eminent scene painter, and the other the author of several popular pieces produced at the Standard – will be living evidence of the care and affection which he bestowed on the education of his offspring.”

The Douglass children grew up in the shadow of John Douglass, learning a variety of theatrical trades at the Standard Theatre.

The 1851 Census listed the Douglass family residing at 3 York Place, Haggeston West, Shoreditch, Middlesex. This was six years after John Douglass began managing the Standard Theatre. That year, the Douglass household included: John Douglass (37, Comedian), Jane (35), Isabella (12), John (8), Richard (6), Henry (3), Alice (1/2), Two servants.

A decade later the 1861 Census listed the Douglass Household at Castle Villa, Dalston House,Hackney, Middlesex . By now, Richard’s older brother John Thomas Douglass (Jr.) was listed as a dramatic author, with 16-yrs.-old Richard Douglass still listed as a Scholar. Other Members in the John Douglass (Sr.) household included: John (47), Jane (45), Isabella Caroline (22, organist), John Thomas (18, dramatic author), Samuel R. (16, scholar), Henry C. (13, scholar), Alice C. (11, scholar), Frederick J. (9, scholar), Arthur D. (4), Agnes M. (2), Samuel (father, 81), Emily Bayles (niece, 16), and two servants.

By the age of 20, Richard Douglass’s scenic art was making news. Here are just a few articles from 1865:

On Oct. 1, 1865, The Era reported, “New and Beautiful scenery by Mr. Richard C. Douglass” for INGOMAR and THE BRIDAL at the “New Great National Standard Theatre, Shoreditch” (page 8).

On Oct. 15, 1865, The Era announced, r New Scenery by M. Richard Douglass” for OTELLO and MERCHANT OF VENICE. “ (page 8).

On Oct. 22, 1865, The Era reported, “New and Extensive Scenery by Mr. Richard Douglass” for production HENRY THE FOURTH. (p. 8)

Both Richard and his father were mentioned in an article about this same production on Nov 5, 1865, Reynold’s Newspaper: “The National Standard. Mr. John Douglass, the spirited proprietor of this theatre, in pursuance of a policy he has carried out for two years, of having one or two stars in the profession as an attraction, engaged for some months this season Mr. Creswick, the well-known tragedian, Mr. Ryder (of the Princess’s and Lyceum Theatre), and Miss Sarah Thorne, a very clever and engaging actress…The new scenery by Mr. Richard Douglass, Mr. J. Neville, Mr. Wellsey, and their assistants, was really beautiful, especially the view of the plain of Shrewsbury and the battle which decided the fate of the insurgents” [Henry the Fourth]  (p. 4).

Douglas would continue to work with John Garside Neville (1820-1886) for the next two decades. Neville came from a silk dying background; he was already working in the family business when the census was taken in 1841. By the 1851 census, Neville had transitioned from the silk-dying trade to scenic art. That year he was listed a scenic artist, living in Holywell, Shoreditch, Middlesex. By 1871 census, with his son, Fred Neville, working as an assistant, both living in Haggeston West, St Leonard Shoreditch, London.

On Nov, 5, 1865, Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper described the scenery for Henry IV, reporting “The new scenery by Mr. Richard Douglass is bold and full of interesting detail – Shrewsbury fight, need it be said, coming in for the greatest honours of scenic building and painting” (p. 8). This scene was also mentioned in The Era on Nov. 5, 1865: “The new and beautiful scenery painted by Mr. Richard Douglass and will include the Palace in London – Gadshill by Moonlight – The Rebel Camp – The Plain of Shrewsbury”

On Dec. 24, 1865, The Era published an article about The Standard Theatre’s pantomime – “Pat-a-cake, Pat-a-cake, Baker’s-man; or Harlequin Bah! Bah! Black Sheep” reporting that “a splendid scene [Causeway of the Pixies]” was painted by Mr. Richard Douglass” (p. 12). The article continued, “A perfect hive of mechanics have been engaged for the production and novel effects of a the Fairy Ballet and Transformation scenes…[the Causeway of the Pixies and Herr Kozenou’s Patent Steam Shaft will be brought into requisition to develop some of the most extraordinary mechanical contrivances ever placed before an English audience…The New Scenery painted by Mr. Douglass, including the Fairy ballet mentioned, and a  most truthful representation of a Village Green, with cattle grazing, and live sheep in a sheep-fold” (p. 8).

Douglass was also working with scenic artist John Neville to paint the settings. On Dec. 31, 1865, The Era announced that “The beautiful scenery has been painted by Mr. Richard Douglass and Mr. J. Neville, the first-named of whom has thoroughly excelled in all his previous efforts [great descriptions.”

It was not until December 1865, that we newspaper credit William Telbin (1815-1873)  with the training of Richard Douglass. On  Dec. 31, 1865, Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper  reported “The scenery, by Mr. Richard Douglass, who has been a pupil under Mr. Telbin, is very beautiful, and much of it is in the celebrated artist’s best style (p. 7).

Descriptions of Douglass’ scene painting flooded newspapers by the late-1860s. Telbin and Douglass continued to work together, with Telbin painting a new act-drop and Douglass painting the stock scenery for the Standard Theatre  after the venue was destroyed by fire on Oct. 28, 1866.

The New National Standard Theatre reopened in December 1867, after its foundation stone was laid on July 4 of that same year.  

An illustration of the new theatre was published in The Builder  on Dec. 28, 1867 (p. 940).

On Dec 28, 1867, The Builder published described the new venue in an article entitled, “The National Standard Theatre, Shoreditch” (p. 28). The article reported, “The National Standard Theatre was burnt down in October of last year, and for some time the site has remained unoccupied.  In July 1867, however, the first stone of a new theatre was laid; and last week the building was opened to the public. It is large and lofty, and we now give a view of the interior, produced under some difficulties. The ground upon which the old Standard stood has been considerably enlarged for the new theatre by a purchase adjoining property. The site was originally that of the old Curtain Theatre, one of the most ancient playhouses in the metropolis. This theatre is mentioned as early as 1578, in a sermon at St. Paul’s Cross. Ben Johnson exhibited is abilities here as both an actor and an author. Upon this ground, Mr. Douglass has erected his new theatre. The main building is 167 ft. in length and 90 ft. wide. The height of the interior, from pit floor to the top of the dome is 84 fts. Within this space four tiers of boxes and a gallery are constructed, each one receding from the other, the lowest circle being 54 ft. in width, the highest on 66ft. There are no columns visible in front of the house. The first tier is a balcony of cushioned arm chairs, covered in crimson velvet. Behind is a circle of comfortable little private boxes, fitted and lighted in a convenient manner. The shape of the interior of the building is a horse-show. The theatre is to be lighted by a massive crystal sunlight, by Messrs. Defries & Sons. All the staircases are of stone. The gallery staircase and the two at the side of the proscenium are carried the whole height of the building. From the main entrance in Shoreditch a double flight of stone steps conducts a spacious lobby, where they break off to communicate in separate flights with the several tiers. This lobby is surmounted by a dome, rising 40 ft. The box saloon is large. An iron bridge spans the room, forming the main entrance to the third tier of boxes. Above the saloon and running nearly the whole length of the front building, is a spacious room, which will make a concert of billiard room, There are ninety private boxes in the theatre. The decorations re mostly of papier mâché, coloured and gilt. The stage at the proscenium is 44 ft. wide, and from the footlights to the back wall is 70 ft., and to the front of the first horse-shoe 66 ft. To the barrel-loft the height is 94 ft., hence the greater part of the stage working will be in the flies, the scenery consisting chiefly of cloths. The act-drop has been painted by William Telbin. It is partly shown in the view. The curtain is composed of crimson silk velvet, arranged in folds, and embellished with golden fringe. We may take another opportunity to speak of the merits or demerits of this new place of public resort when we have seen it filled with persons” (p. 942).

During the planning and construction of the New National Standard Theatre, John Douglass managed the City Theatre of London (later St, James Theatre), 35-36 Bishopsgate Street, Norton Folgate.

Richard Douglass was also credited with new scenery for the City Pantomime “Ding Dong, Bell, Pussy’s in the Well,” under the management of his father (The Era 6 Jan 1867 p. 8). On Jan. 27, 1867, The Era reported, “The new scenery by Richard Douglass, Including the Transformation Scene (the theme of universal admiration, representing Ding, Dong, Glade, comprising Thirteen distinct Changes, and terminating with a splendid Tableaux” (p. 8). On Feb. 3, 1867, The Era published that the Grand Transformation Scene, by Richard Douglass, was “nightly greeted with tremendous bursts of applause” (p. 8).

Douglass was continually heralded for his landscapes and woodland scenes; it was his specialty. In fact, there was almost too much information in online newspaper collections to process. Each year, there were a couple hundred mentions of Richard Douglass’ scenic work, and search results continued to increase throughout the 1870s. For example, there were 456 matches by 1879 and by 1883, there were well over 600; these were all for the correct person. Douglass’s name consistently advertised as a scenic artist and was repeatedly listed as a manager and scenic artist at a few theatres.  He was a prolific scenic artist and theatre manager.

Douglass’s scenic art was described in detail throughout 1868. On Jan. 19, 1868, p. 11, The Era  described the Christmas spectacle at the Standard Theatre, Oranges and Lemons, Said the Bells of St. Clement’s: or Harlequin and the Good Fairy of the New Year. “…the exquisite sylvan scene, called the Golden Stem Valley, was one of surpassing loveliness, and that it, and the view of a Pass in the Kingdom of Riches, had been most artistically executed by Mr. Richard Douglass, who designed and painted them. Now that circumstances are more favorable for observation, we can, with greater readiness, recognize the truthful perspective, clear outlines, and rich colouring which are conspicuous in them. In the superb Transformation Scene of the Dripping Well, or Dewdrops at Evening, there is also now greater fulness and brilliancy. The lovely living tenants of the vast aquarium, and the whole glittering embellishments of the scene, look superlatively resplendent. Some of the hues are particularly pretty, and the effect produced by them are akin to magical. The acting in the piece is equal in excellence to the mounting of it.” (p. 11).

Douglass became known for his spectacular stage scenes at the Standard Theatre that included Alphine waterfalls and train wrecks. On May 17, 1868, The Era  reported on the audience’s reception of this thrilling scene in Danger, reporting, “The Wreck Scene nightly redemanded, and receives a perfect ovation” (p. 8). In addition to working at the Standard, Douglass also became associated with the Egyptian Theatre. On Nov. 1, 1868, The Era announced that Mr. Richard Douglass also delivered scenery for the Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly.

In 1870, Douglass started a new chapter in both his professional and personal life. He began to place a series of advertisements in The Era. Over the next three decades, his name would constantly appear in newspapers, listing his services and theatrical associations. In 1870, an advertisement placed in The Era stated:

“To Theatrical Managers and Others. Mr. Richard Douglass, Scenic Artist, having at his command a Large Painting Room, and every facility for Scene Painting, is prepared to arrange for Large or Small Contracts on reasonable terms. Address, New National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 1)

That same year, he also married his first wife, Marie Armstrong (1848-1871). The couple was married on May 10, 1870, at Holy Trinity, Newington. On June 12, 1870, The Era announced, “Marriage – On May 30^th, at Holy Trinity Church, Southwark, by Rev. Daniel A. Moullin., S. Richard Douglass (the well-known scenic artist, the second son of John Douglass, Esq., Proprietor of the National Standard Theatre), to Marie, eldest daughter of William Armstrong, Esq. No cards.”

The 1871 Census listed the young couple living at 1 Graham Terrace in West Hackney. The household included Richard (26), Mary (29) and a servant. On Oct. 7, 1871, The Graphic: An Illustrated Weekly Newspaper announced the arrival of their first child – “Douglass.- On the 28^th ult., at 3, Graham Terrace, Dalston, N. E., the wife of Mr. Richard Douglass, of a son” (p. 22). Marie died the next day. Ernest “Leslie” Law Goodwin was baptized on Jan. 28, 1872.

During this same time, Douglass was completing scenery for the Christmas pantomime, Aladdin. On Jan. 7, 1872, The Era reported, “Always celebrated for its pantomimes, has never produced one so elaborately mounted as Aladdin, which will manifestly be held in high favour by the eastern region for the next two months to come. The scenery painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, an artist in the most foremost rank, is extremely good, and the mechanical effects are more novel and ingenious than usual. Vast as is the capacity of this extensive building, room is not always found for the large concourse of persons eagerly crowding round the various avenues to get a chance of beholding the diversified Recreation Grounds of the Emperor, the brilliant “Revels of Celestial Slaves of the Lamp,” and that marvel of the mechanism the Ascent of the Flying Palace.” (p. 10).

He was also delivering scenery for touring shows, working alongside other well-known London artists, including Charles Fox and Fred Hall. On March 13, 1872, the North Mail, Newcastle Daily Chronicle (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) advertised the production of Coriolanus with “New scenery by Mr. Charles Fox, Mr. Richard Douglass, and Mr. F. Hall” (p. 1).

In addition to placing newspaper advertisements for his painting services, also began listing scenery for sale. On 16 Nov. 1873, The Era published, “For Sale, Fit-Up, suitable for a Travelling Entertainment. Magnificent Proscenium, Side Scenes (with doors), Back Roller Scene (to match), Painted by Richard Douglass, Standard Theatre, London. For price, apply to M. B., 3 Northfield-terrace, Cheltenham.”

This practice continued throughout the duration of his career. I have become quite fascinated with his advertisements, as they are so consistent and numerous in The Era. Here are a few of his advertisements from 1878-1888:

On March 12, 1878, The Era  published, “To Amateur Theatrical Clubs and Others. For Sale (New), Several Drop Scenes, with Batons and Rollers. For price and subjects, apply to Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate. Estimates given for complete sets of Amateur Scenery, Prosceniums, &c.” (p. 19).

On August 11, 1878, The Era announced, “For sale, several drop scenes, with roller, &c., quite new. Suitable for halls, amateur clubs, or small theatres. Size, 17 ft. wide, 14 ft. high. Also, a New Act-Drop. Apply to Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 15).

On June 18, 1881, The Era published, “For sale, several drop scenes (new), 16 ft. by 14 ft. Also, an Act Drop. Apply, Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate, London” (p. 23).

In January 1882, The Era, published, “Painting Rooms, National Standard Theatre

Mr. Richard Douglass, Scenic Artist Is prepared to Accept contracts (Large or Small) upon reasonable terms. Information and Estimates requisite for Stocking New Theatres. Scenery for Amateur Performances kept in stock or painted to order. Panoramas, complete or separate views, &c. Address as above” (p. 7).

On Feb 10, 1883, The Era  advertised, “FOR SALE, a New ACT-DROP, size 20ft. wide, 17 ft., 10 in. long, capable of being reduced, or even enlarged, without injury to the subject. To be sold reasonable, owning to a mistake made in giving measurement. Address, Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre, London” (p. 21).

On Feb 23, 1884, The Era advertised, “For Sale, Several Drop Scenes, size 16 ft, 6 in. wide, 14 ft. high; also an Act Drop, all new. Address Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre” (p. 26).

On July 26, 1884, The Era published, “National Standard Theatre. Richard Douglass (Scenic Artist) is prepared to accept Contracts, large or small, upon reasonable terms. Estimates requisite for stocking new Theatres. Scenery for Amateur Performances kept in stock or painted to order. Panoramas, complete or separate views, &c. Address as above” (p. 20).

In Jan. 1885, The Era published, “For Sale, small act drop, 20 ft. wide 17 ft. high; also some stock cloths, 16 ft. 6 in. by 14 ft. 6 in. All new. Address Richard Douglass, Painting Room. National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 24).

On March 7, 1885, The Era  published, “For Sale, a Small Act-Drop, 20 ft. wide by 17ft. high. Also, some Stock Cloths, 16 ft. 6 in. by 14 ft. 6 in. All new. Address, Richard Douglass, Painting Room, National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 21).

On March 27, 1886, The Era announced, “For Sale, Several New Cloths, various subjects. Two sizes, 26 ft. wide by 21 ft. high. 17 ft. wide by 15 ft. high. Very reasonable. Also, a Small Act-Drop. Apply Richard Douglass, Painting Room, Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate, London” (p. 20).

On Jan. 16, 1886, The Era published, “For sale. Two cloths. 26 ft., Wide, 21 ft. high. Subjects – An Old French Street, a woody Landscape. These were painted for Mrs. Langtry on Tour, but afterwards not required. Also, several smaller cloths, 16 ft. 6 in. wide, 14 ft. 6 in. high. Subjects – Various. Address, Richard Douglass, Painting Room, Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 20).

On Oct. 29, 1887, The Era published, “For Sale, several cloths, all perfectly new. Sizes, 26 ft. by 21 ft. by 18 ft. and 17 ft. by 15 ft. Drawing-rooms, Oak Chambers, Street, Gardens, &c. Address, Richard Douglass, Painting Room, Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 22).

On May 19, 1888, The Era  published, “For Sale. – Several Cloths (New), various sizes, 26ft. by 21ft., 21ft. by 18ft., 17ft. by 14ft. Drawing rooms, Landscapes, Gardens. Apply Richard Douglass, Painting Rooms, Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate.” (p. 21).

Back to the story…

In 1874, Douglass delivered new scenery to St. James Hall after the space was renovated. [The Era  8 Feb 1874, p. 9]. The announcement came shortly after his father, John Douglass Sr. passed on Jan. 31, 1874. That fall, Richard Douglass married his second wife, Laurina Campland Brook (1853-1940), the daughter of William and Emily Brook of Kennington, Surrey. Brook was an actress who later went by the stage name of Stella Brereton. The couple was married on Oct. 28, 1874. At the time, she was living with her parents in Kennington, Surrey. Her father worked for a Commercial Newspaper agency.

1874 certainly had its share of challenges. Despite the joy of getting married, Douglass immediately was faced with a series of challenges. He and his older brother, John T. Douglass began to manage the Standard Theatre. The transition must not have been an easy one, as they were immediately faced with a court case. On Dec. 13. 1874, The Observer published hearings from the Court of Queen’s Bench. The case, “Shore v. Douglass and Another. – Accident at the Standard Theatre” was described in detail. An actor was suing to recover damages for personal injuries received from a fall, citing the cause to be the alleged mismanagement of a part of machinery at the Standard Theatre, Shoreditch (p. 5). The plaintiff was a comedian with the Adelphi Company, playing the character Heery Cavanaugh in the “Peep o’ Day.” His foot caught on a projecting piece of wood (piece of profile tree near a platform) during an action scene causing him to fall about twelve feet and suffer a head injury.  The issue was that the tree profile had been brought with the Adelphi company, and there had been no issue several times during rehearsals. The ruling supported that the accident did not arise in the manner stated by the plaintiff.

That fall, Douglass was also completing scenery for the Standard Theatre’s Christmas pantomime, Harlequin Robinson Crusoe and His Man Friday. On Dec. 20, 1874, Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper  published about the production, describing all of the scenic elements, especially the grand transformation scene. The article reported, “From Storm to Sunshine, includes five distinct mechanical changes. The whole of the scenery has been painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, Mr. J. Neville Goodram [sic.], and assistants; and the pantomime is written, invented, and produced by Mr. John Douglass, author of the pantomimes for the past ten years.” It was further described in The Standard on Dec. 28, 1874:  “It is giving no small amount of praise to the scenery to say that throughout it is equal to anything which the masterly hand of Mr. Richard Douglas has hitherto produced, but especially worthy of commendation are the moving panorama of the journey to the island itself and the transformation scene, which is called “From Storm to Sunshine.” In “The Mystic Isle,” a ballet scene immediately preceding the transformation, is introduced a variety of admirably executed tableaux, in which a pleasing and somewhat remarkable effect is produced by the sudden ignition of gas upon the starts upon the helmets of the dancers as they move about the stage” (p. 3).

The Douglass brothers were starting a new chapter at the Standard Theatre, and in  the summer of 1875 renovated the theatre. When the theatre reopened on July 31, a newspaper article in The Era announced, “They claim to possess the largest and most elegant Theatre in the world, and those who do not take a peep within the walls of the Standard will not be in a hurry to dispute that claim. The house was reopened on the 31^st ult.”On August 8, 1875, The Era reported, “THE STANDARD. During the brief recess the magnificent auditorium of this deservedly-popular East-end establishment has undergone a process of renovation and redecoration which reflects high credit upon the liberality and taste of those entrusted with the management… The decorations which have been executed from designs by Mr. Richard Douglass and under his superintendence, are chiefly in white and gold, with rich crimson upholstery….A  new and pretty act-drop, also from the pencil of Mr. R. Douglass, completes a coup d’œil  truly effective, reminding us forcefully of Covent Garden theatre. The lighting of the theatre is, as ever, brilliant, the massive chandelier forming a fine centerpiece to the handsome hemispherical ceiling…”

The article elaborated that the new act-drop was “painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, with figures by Mr. D. H. Friston, and was “a highly artistic work.” The stage had also been widened and newly furnished throughout.

Douglass continued to work at the Standard and place advertisements in The Era. On Jul 2, 1876, Douglass advertised, “Comedy, Drama, and Travelling Companies, Summer Season. For Hire, on moderate terms, a completely new handsome Fit-Up by Mr. Richard Douglass, Standard Theatre; substantial framework, practical Chambers, Cloths, Act-Drop, Proscenium, Wings, Borders, Gasfittings, &c. Measures 17 feet deep. Proscenium opening 17 by 14 feet. Apply to W. P., 8 Lordship-park, Stoke Newington, N.”

This advertisement was placed after the birth of their first child. Walter Campland Brook Douglass was born on April 19, 1876. Their joy did not last, as Walter passed away shortly after his first birthday, on May 15, 1877. The couple welcomed another child into the world the next year. Bertie Richard CamplandDouglass arrived in July 1878.

In 1879, Richard and and his brother John T. Douglass also became associated with The Park Theatre, Camden-Tow as lessees and managers. On March 9, 1879, The Era reported, “THE PARK. Messrs. John and Richard Douglass evidently do not intend to let the grass grow under their feet, and the enterprise and energy they have displayed during their short occupation of the Park Theatre promises to be rewarded as it deserves to be. The manner in which Mr. Boucicault’s popular drama After Dark has been placed upon the stage at the Park does infinite credit to the management…We have already referred to the excellent and complete manner in which the piece is produced, and we may here mention that they scenery we have commended is the work of Messrs. Richard Douglass and John Neville” (p. 12).

Newspapers were listing “Mr. Richard Douglass, Esq.” as an eminent artist, really heralding his spectacle and transformation scenes. Douglass delivered scenery for the Christmas Pantomime, Beauty and the Beast Royal, at the Park Theatre, Camden-Town. The Grand Pantomime. Beauty and the Beast with “Scenery by Mr. Richard Douglass. His settings included a Grand Transformation Scene.” At the same time, Douglass also painted scenery for the Christmas Pantomime at the Standard.  On Dec. 28, 1879, The Era described the Blue Beard Re-Wived at the Standard. The article announced, “Splendid Spectacles. Gorgeous scenery by Mr. Richard Douglass…Grand spectacle, “The Haunted Blue Chamber,” and Transformation Scene, a Coral Reef.”

Douglass also continued to place advertisements for a variety of scenery. On April 8, 1880, The Era 8 Apr 1880, “For Sale, a very handsome drawing-room set scene, consisting of Five pieces, all practicable, Size 16 ft. High , 7 ft. wide. Folding doors, side doors, window, Fire-place, &c. Perfectly new. To be sold through mistake in measurement. Address, Richard Douglass, Painting-room, National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate

This scenery may have been intended for the Warrior-Square Concert Rooms in Hastings. An image of the building was published in Hastings and St. Leonards-on-Sea as a Health and Pleasure Resort : with Statistics and Local Information (1884).

On June 27, 1880, The Era reported, “Hastings. Warrior-Square Concert Hall…This splendid Hall, which is now fitted with very handsome proscenium and scenery (painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, of Standard and Park Theatres)…” (p. 8). On July 4, 1880, The Era elaborated, “Hastings. – St. Leonard’s-On-Sea.- Warrior-Square Rooms. (Under the Management of Mr. Henry Trenham). The Grand Hall is capable of seating upwards of 1,500 persons. Stage fitted with New Scenery, by Richard Douglass. “One of the finest and most conveniently arranged Halls in the Kingdom; possessed of every accommodation, and admirably adapted for entertainments of every description.” – Observer. “One of the best arranged buildings for performances of any kind out of London.” – Times.

By the end of the year, Richard Douglass’s wife was also making news. On Dec. 25, 1880, Stella Brereton was featured on the front page of The Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News.

Here is a photograph of Stella Brereton, taken by William Henry Gilbert Tate. It is part of the V&A Guy Little Theatrical Photograph Collection. 

Her likeness was also captured twice by Joseph Mordecai in 1883, he painted her in the role of Ophelia. I believe that this painting is now held at the Finnish National Gallery (https://www.kansallisgalleria.fi/en/object/520950 ).

The painting was included in two later exhibitions: “Women’s Exhibition 1900, Earl’s Court, London” and “Exhibition of Jewish Art and Antiquities” (Whitechapel Art Gallery, 1906).

Mordecai’s Ophelia was again mentioned in 1885.  On May 30, 1885, The Era included an article, entitled “The Drama at the Academy”,  article reported, “In the seventh room (644) will be found a three-quarter length portrait of Miss Stella Brereton (Mrs. Richard Douglass), by Mr. Joseph Mordecai, whose picture of the same lady as Ophelia appeared at the Academy of two years ago. The present portrait is not well hung; well enough, however, to show some clever painting of a yellow satin robe and a mantle lined with mouse-coloured fur, as well as the excellent flesh-tints of the face and arms.”

On Feb. 21, 1881, Richard’s mother, Jane Isabelle Goodwin Douglass, passed away in Hackney. Despite their loss, the careers of both Richard Douglass and Stella Brereton were soragin.

One of Douglass’s scenic art projects in 1881 was the act-drop for the Surrey Theatre . That year, George Conquest took over managemen of the venue, staging melodramas and pantomimes, many written by himself. Douglass’s act-drop depicted a view of Richmond from the Thames.

On Aug 6, 1881, The Daily Telegraph  reported, “SURREY THEATRE. – TO-NIGHT.- First week under the management of George Conquest and Paul Merritt. Theatre entirely redecorated. New Act Drop by Richard Douglass. Popular prices” (p. 4). On Aug. 6, 1881, The Era  added “a new act-drop, painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, who has chosen Richmond-bridge for his scene, and has a brilliant representation of that favorite resort, the bridge, the distant villas, and the woods of the fine park being shown reflected on the glittering bosom of the Thames” (p. 8). What I find interesting, is that in 1881, the Surrey Theatre had a scenic artist – J. J. Keith. He even placed in The Era, located just about those of Richard Douglass. On June 18, 1881, he placed an advertisement near Richard Douglass’s. It stated: “Scenic Artist, Mr. J. J. Keith, of Royal Surrey Theatre, late of Theatre Royal, Drury-lane, Lyceum, Continental Theatres, Dioramas, &c., as Principal, Stock, or Contract. 1 & 2, Camberwell New-road, London, S. E.” (p. 23). This indicates the quality of Douglass’ work, as act-drop projects were highly valued by scenic artists as the most priced type of work.

He also painted scenery for the pantomime production The Babes in the Woods.  On Dec. 9, 1881, The Leicester Journal, and Midland Countries General Advertiser included an ad for the production with “Special scenery, painted expressly for this production (including Grand Moving Panorama of well-known Local Views), by Mr. Richard Douglass, of the National Standard Theatre, London” (p. 5).

The 1881 Census listed Richard Douglass’s home at 9 Park Village East, Regents Park, St. Pancras, London. His household included Richard (36, Theatrical manager), Laurina (26, actress), Ernest L. G. (9), Bertie C. (2), Ann C. Waldie (69, visitor), Emily A. Brookes (44, visitor, embroiderer), and a servant.

Despite Douglass’s good fortune, extensive name-recognition, and constant stream of projects, tragedy struck – again –  when The Park Theatre was totally destroyed by fire on Sept. 11, 1881 (p. 7). The last show in the venue was the National Grand Opera Company’s production of La Sonnambula. The fire stated in a dis-used box on the dress-circle tier, shortly after the departure of John Douglass. On Sept. 11. Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper announced, “Mr. John Douglass only left the theatre, in company of Mr. Johnson, the Manager, two or three minutes before the outbreak was discovered….The house now destroyed was opened on the 31^st of May 1873, as the Royal Alexandra theatre, Mr. Thorpe Pede being the manager. It has passed through a chequered career, and it is certain that no fortunes were made under any management.” (p. 7)

On Dec. 1-, 1881, The Bulletin reported, “Fifty-seven principal theatres in different parts of the world have been destroyed by fire this year” (p. 7)

Fortunately, Douglass’s Painting rooms were still located at the Standard Theatre, so he remained unaffected in scenic production. At the beginning of 1883 Douglass was credited with new scenery at St. James Hall when the theatre was renovated (The Morning Post 2 Jan 1883 p. 1). That spring, he and his wife purchased subscriptions for The Silver King, supporting the “oldest working actor and dramatic author” in London, J. B. Johnstone (The Era April 7, 1883, p. 7).

Other projects of note in the 1880s included:

On June 5, 1885, The Western Morning News included an ad for “The Green Bushes” at Theatre Royal, Plymouth. “New scenery painted by Mr. Richard Douglass, Standard Theatre London, and Mr. G. Twedell” (p. 4).

After Dark at The Standard (The Era, May 22, 1886, p. 14) – “What is done at the Standard is always done well, and it is not, therefore, at all necessary to insist upon the facts that the drama has been staged with excellent scenery from the brush of that clever artist Mr. Richard Douglass, and that the greatest care has been taken in order to make the sensation part of the business as effective as possible…”

Jack and the Beanstalk at the Standard Theatre (The Era, Dec. 31, 1886) – “The principal effects are – The Village of Content, changing from Winter to Summer, by Richard Douglass, the Palace of the Moon, the Carwine Rocks and Burning Geysers, changing to the ice-bound Regions; Grand Transformation of Jack’s Dreams of Fairy Land, painted by J. Soames, G. Blake, and assistants” (p. 4).

 The Royal Mail at the Standard Theatre (The Sunday People Aug. 21, 1887) – “In the stage arrangements and the painting of the scenery, Mr. John and Mr. Richard Douglass have excelled all their previous efforts. Needless to record that they were called to the curtain three times during the progress of the play, or that when the curtain fell.”

In 1887, Richard Douglass was painting scenery for The Grand Theatre, Islington.

On Oct. 8, 1887, The Era mentioned Douglass in “Theatrical Gossip” section – “A remarkable example of how much more effective on the stage scene painting, when artistically done, is than the carpenter’s work is given by the boats on the shore in the first act of Our Joan at the Grand Theatre, Islington. By the exercise of his art, Mr. Richard Douglass has given to these profile accessories that the appearance of roundness and solidness which is the object often attempted in vain, to be attained by “building up” and stage joinery” (p. 8)

On Nov 3, 1888, The Era reported, “The act-drop for the New Grand Theatre, Islington, which is fast approaching completion, is being painted by Mr. Richard Douglass. The subject is a classical composition representing the mythological story of “Diana and Actæon.” Mr. Douglas has also painted two scenes for the pantomime at the Pavilion Theatre, and is fitting for dramatic performances the New Victoria Hall at Kettering” (p. 9).

Douglass began to branch out, accepting work at an increasing number of theaters, such as the Prince of Wales Theatre in Birmingham. For the 1889 production of Master and Man, the scenery was credited to Douglass, C. R. Durant and W. T. Hemsley. Newspapers reported, “It would be unfair to dismiss this successful production without a word of hearty praise for the pretty and artistic scenery that has been provided by Messrs. Richard Douglas, C. R. Durant, and W. T. Hemsley.”

Douglass also worked with Fred Storey to deliver new scenery for “La Prima Donna” (Sunday Dispatch  13 Oct 1889 p. 8).

Douglass abruptly terminated his career at the Standard. On April 20, 1889, The Era reported, “Mr. Richard Douglass, after a connection of twenty years as scenic artist with the Standard Theatre, has retired from that post, but will still continue to carry out contracts for scene painting generally. Mr. Douglass’s many remarkable achievements in his profession, including the well-known stage pictures of “Rotten Row” in Glad Tidings, the “Crystal Palace” in The Ruling Passion, “Epsom Downs” in Daybreak, and the celebrated “Henley” scene in The Dark Secret, are sufficient proofs of his remarkable artistic ability to secure for him all the commission he wants, if not even more than he can execute” (p. 16).

On April 27, 1889, Douglass placed the following ad: “Painting Rooms, 19 Tottenham-Street, Tottenham-Court-Road. Mr. Richard Douglass. Scenic Artist, having retired from the Scene Painting at the Standard Theatre, is prepared to accept contracts upon reasonable terms. Estimates for Stocking New Theatres, Halls, &c. Address, as above.” (p. 3).

Douglass also liquidated some of his assets that were stored at the Standard Theatre that spring. On May 4, 1889, The Era published, “For sale, Several small cloths. Size, 21 ft by 16 ft. Quite new. Also set of Four Drapery Wings and Four tree Wings, 12^th, by 4 ft. Suitable for Small Halls, Amateur Clubs, &c. Address Richard Douglass, Painting Room, Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate” (p. 21).

That summer, Douglass painted a new act drop for the newly -renovated Colchester Theatre. On Aug 17, 1889, The Era reported, “New scenery and a new act-drop are being painted by Mr. Richard Douglass” (p. 7). It was Frank Matcham who drew the plans for the extensive alterations.

However, by the fall of 1889, Douglass’s career took a sharp turn. He began to perform on the stage, as well as paint scenery. On Nov. 24,1889, Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper announced, “Mr. Richard H. Douglass, so long connected with the Standard theatre, has been engaged to play the Old Man of the Sea in the pantomime of Sinbad, at the Grand Theatre, Glasgow” (p 5). Douglass also painted the moving panorama of Sinbad’s Voyage. Advertisements credited four scenic artists – “Scenery by Julian Hicks, Bruce Smith, Richard Douglass, and Harry Mapleson”[The Era  7 Dec 1889 p. 24]. Amazingly, the entire show was listed for sale that spring. Advertisements were placed in The Era  [April 12, 1890, p. 21].

In some instances, Douglass was listed as a scenic artist associated with “the Avenue Theatre and Standard Theatre, London” [The Era  21 Dec 1889 p. 18]. Douglass’s association with the Avenue Theatre included stage setting for an opera Harlequinade entitled, The Belles of the Village by Hugh Foster.

On Dec. 22, 1889, The Observer reported, “new scenery by Richard Douglass” for “Harlequinade” at the Avenue Theatre (p. 2).

In addition to painting and performing, Douglass began authored several stories. On Dec. 28, 1889, The Newcastle Weekly Courant published “The Clown’s Story: Told in the Prompter’s Box” by Richard H. Douglass (p. 6). I am not including the article in its entirety due to length. The story tells of the love between a father and daughter, both who were victims in a tragic theatre fire at “King’s Theatre, Brownpool.” The blaze was started by an arsonist who sought revenge. Although the father rescued his daughter, suspended in a wire above the stage (awaiting her entrance). Both became separated until each woke up in the hospital. Believing her father dead, the young girl lost her senses and couldn’t recognize her father when he discovered her in the hospital room. She died in his arms, not recognizing him at all. Although the father still performed as a clown, on the anniversary of her father’s death he could not go on.”

A few years later, Douglass wrote an entertaining story from the perspective of a theatre cat. On Nov. 4, 1892, The Era reported, “Amongst the original articles is an amusing autobiography of a theatrical cat, written by Mr. Richard Douglass. The theatre cat is a sacred animal, and the reminiscences of this particular animal are very entertaining” (p. 15). I have yet to locate a copy of this publication.

On January 19, 1890, Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper announced. “Mr. Richard H. Douglass, who is now playing with great success in the pantomime of Sinbad at the Grand Theatre, Glasgow, has arranged to go on a short tour with his original humorous and musical entertainment, commencing in the West of England about the middle of February. Engagements have also been accepted for several London Halls.” (p. 5). Some of the venues were in Ramsgate, Godstone, Crawley, Portsmouth, Cowes, Edmonton, Dartmouth,  Theatre Royal, Torquay; Theatre Royal, Shrewsbury; Ostend (Belgium); Chelsea Town Hall (The Daily Telegraph  March 1, 1890, p. 1); reviews included Westminster and Pimlico News  on Mar 1, 1890, p. 2)- “Mr. Richard H. Douglass received an extraordinary and lengthy ovation on re-appearing at the Pastime, displaying wondrous versatility in his original “Illustrated Lecture – London,” and following satirical burlesque “Dickson’s Show.” This gentleman should be seen and heard, as description fails to convoy a due sense of his powers of humour. He is announced to appear again this evening.”

Westminster and Pimlico News  on Mar 8, 1890, p. 3: “The indescribable favourite, Mr. Richard Douglass, kept the audience in roars of laughter, by his first performance of a new original “scientific lecture,  “The Galvenised Battery,” the ingredients of which was compounded evidently being derived from sleepless observation of public instances, whose mimic representation produced convulsive recognition. His second sketch, “Imitations,” being equally successful.”

By the spring of 1890, Douglass was performing his own act throughout the country. On April 5, 1890, the Chelsea News reported, “Mr. Richard H. Douglass cannot be reported or aptly described, how for well-nigh half-an-hour in his “Geographical Lecture,” and quarter of an hour with his humorous sketch, “Black v. White,” he kept his audience in convulsive laughter, may be best comprehended by going this evening to the Pastime to hear the original “Pantomime Selections” and “Conjuring Extraordinary” – he is truly a marvelous genius. Mr. Harriot is to be commended for bringing him forward after the scourge of influenza, when ordinary remedies are inefficacious” (p. 2). I have to wonder, it the influenza pandemic provided openings for relatively unknown performers, such as Douglass, to fill the slots previously frequented by well-known names. It was at this time, that 

Richard began using his middle initial – “H”; going by the stage name of Richard H. Douglass.

He consistently placed ads as a comedian, burlesque actor, and character actor, while maintain a scenic studio. But his painting work soon took a backseat to his performance career. He was now listing his studio address as 19 Tottenham Street. On April 12, 1890, The Era published a want-ad by Douglass that advertised “Wanted to Sell, Several Cloths (New). Various subjects. Suitable for Stock, 12 ft. by 17ft. Address Richard Douglas, 19 Tottenham-street, W. C.”  However, work had slowed down enough that there was no need to maintain a full-time assistant. In fact, Douglass’s scenic art assistant sought other employment that summer. On Aug. 9, 1890, The Era published, “Wanted, by Young Man (late pupil of Mr. Richard Douglass, London), Engagement as Assistant in Painting-room or any other capacity, Theatre or Music Hall. First-class references. Address, M. 77, Liverpool-rd., Lo

Douglas sporadically painted scenery for the next few years. In 1891 for The Double Marriage (Harold B. Nelson Co.), A Yorkshire Lass at the (Queen’s Theatre, London), Warwick Gray’s Black Diamonds, and an Act-drop for the Aquarium.

Between April and June 1891, Douglass moved his painting rooms from 19 Tottenham-Street, Tottenham-Court-Road, to a space next to the Grand Theatre, Islington.

His painting rooms were next to the theatre (unlabeled space in illustration below), hence his advertisements and makers marks stating “Next Grand Theatre.”

On June 27, 1891, The Era  published, “Wanted, to Sell, Several Cloths (New), 21ft. by 17ft. Various subjects. All Six Wings, 12ft by 4ft. Apply, Richard Douglass Painting Rooms, next Grand Theatre, Islington” (p. 19).

On March 12, 1892, Douglass’s ad appeared just about W. T. Hemsley’s in The Era. It was the passing of a torch. Douglass’s ad stated: “Painting Rooms, next to Grand Theatre, Islington. Mr. Richard Douglass, Scenic Artist, is prepared to accept Contracts on very reasonable terms. Estimates free. Apply as above.” Below, Hemsley’s ad stated: “Mr. W. T. Hemsley, Scenic Artist, has removed to his New Painting Rooms and Scene Manufactory (the Largest and Best Appointed in London), 2 Felix-street, Westminster-bridge-road, S. E. Large or Small Contracts Arranged upon the most reasonable terms consistent with the best Artistic Work” (p. 2)

Douglass continued to perform at a variety of venues, even in the Newcastle Theatre Royal pantomime as Little Toddlekins in Bo-Peep. He also appeared in The Trumpet Call at the Adelphi [The Pall Mall Gazette 22 Feb 1892 p. 1]. He made an even bigger splash doing a series of impersonations. On Sept. 17, 1892, The Era  reported that Douglass was performing his skit at the Royalty Theatre, Empire Theatre and Trocadero (p. 27).

On Feb. 11, 1893, The Era reported, “In consequence of the success of Mr. Richard H. Douglass in the pantomime at Theatre Royal, Newcastle-on-Tyne, he has been re-engaged (for the third time) by Messrs. Hoard and Wyndham, and will appear next Christmas at Royal Lyceum, Edinburgh. He has also signed with Mr. Thomas W, Charles for Prince’s Theatre, Manchester, pantomime, 1894-95. Mr. Douglass returns to London halls on Easter Monday” (p. 17). On May 20, 1893, The Era reported thatMr. Richard Douglass’s “Pantomime” and “Melodrama in Ten Minutes” were “well-known to audiences in the metropolis” (p. 17). His performance career was being managed by Blackmore’s Agency, at 11 , Garrick-street, W. C. Advertisements placed by Douglass in newspapers also listed his agent. On Feb. 10, 1894, The Era published, “Mr. Richard H. Douglass, Royal Lyceum Theatre, Edinburgh, Blackmores Agency, 11, Garrick-street, W. C.” (p. 27). In 1894, hew performed at the at Empire Place [Feb 24, 1894, The Era, p. 27]; Scotia Variety Theatre, Glasgow [The Era 10 March 1894 p 27.] to name a few.

All the while, he continued to sell off his scenic stock and paint. Scenic art projects in 1894 included the scenery for an Uncle Tom’s Cabin production by the Moore and Burgess minstrels. Douglass moved his studio again in 1894, now advertising: “Painting Rooms, next Grand Theatre, Islington. Mr. Richard Douglass, Scenic Artist, (is prepared to accept Contracts on very reasonable terms). Estimates free. Apply as Above” [The Era 29 Aug 1891 p. 2].

On April 20, 1895, The Era reported, “Mr. Richard Douglass opens shortly at the Palace in an original monologue, The Rehearsal. He has also been engaged for a leading part in next year’s pantomime at the Grand, Islington, by Mr. Charles Wilmot” (p. 16). He was also portraying a series of cultural stereotype, including Chinese Laundrymen. On Dec. 27, 1895, The Daily Telegraph described mentioned the performance of Richard H. Douglass in the role of the Chinese Laundryman, Wishee-Washee, reporting, “This comical little gentleman has a rare frolic with the folk who patronize his establishment.” (p. 3).

On  July 20, 1895, The Era mentioned Douglass’ scenery for The Honour of the House, a five-act drama by H. H. Lewis, produced at Theatre Royal, Nottingham. “The scenery, which has all been specially designed by Mr. Richard Douglass, is truly magnificent. In act one, a view of the wine merchant’s yard, with distinct out-look on old London, is shown that is extraordinarily realistic – queer nooks and quaint bits of a bygone time that would delight an antiquary. The scene of the wine vaults, too, is remarkably picturesque, adorned as it is with fungus and cobwebs that make you almost scent the rich vintages hidden away amongst them. But excelling all is the view of the Pyrenees. The stage is one large waste of mountains – wild, barren, sterile – and here occurs a clever mechanical change. From absolute still life everything alters to masses of snow and ice, until it culminates in a veritable tornado, quite realistic in its intensity. Altogether the mounting is noble and picturesque in the highest degree.”

On Nov. 2, 1895, The Era credited Douglass with a new act-drop and scenery for the new Ladbroke Hall, Notting-hill. The venue was recently renovated, with an increased stage and raised  grid iron. On Jan 18, 1896, The Era announced Douglass was painting special scenery at Collin’s. Others providing scenery were Fritz Wallis and son who were painting at the Middlesex (p. 17).

And this was a turning point, as Douglass listed his paint rooms next to the Grand Theatre in Islington “To Let.”

On Feb. 22, 1896, The Era published, “Wanted, to Let, Storage for Scenery, Large and Dry. Apply, Richard Douglass, Painting Rooms, next Grand Theatre, Islington, N.” (p. 27).

On July 25, 1896, The Era published, “Wanted, to Let, Storage, Large and Dry. Apply, Richard Douglass, Painting Rooms, next Grand Theatre, Islington” (p. 21).

Douglass was not having much luck letting out his space. On Oct. 24, 1896, The Era published, “Wanted, to Let, Storage for Scenery. Large and Dry. Apply, Richard Douglass, next, Grand Theatre, Islington” (p. 28).

In the meanwhile, he continued to paint scenery. On August 22, 1896, The Era listed that new scenery for The Indian Mutiny was traveling with new scenery “painted from photographs by Nicholas Hinchey, Lionel Hart, and Richard Douglass, and the picture of the Ruined Mosque on the Mountain Pass, with its warm glow and cleverly suggested architectural detail, may be picked out as one of the remarkable examples of stage brush work” (p. 9).

Side note: The line, “painted from photographs by Nicholas Hinchey, Lionel Hart, and Richard Douglass” involves the subject of my next post – Hinchey. He also is also one of the artists who painted scenery to Normansfield Theatre.

Douglass also delivered scenery for Mr. N. Brigata’s Company production of En Route (The Era  19 Sep 1896 p. 5). At the end of the year, he was painting with E. Butts on the pantomime Cinderella, or Harlequin the Street Little Lass with her Trilbys of Glass and Pretty Prince Caramel at the Grand in London (The Standard 28 Dec 1896 p. 2). He also delivered scenery for Little Cinderella  at Theatre Royal, Handley.  On Jan. 2, 1897, The Era reported, “The scenery painted by Edwin Watts and Richard Douglass (p. 22) Douglass was also painting with Arthur Hillier that year.

An advertisement appeared in The Era on Jan. 23, 1897, that surprised me and supports the re-sale value of well-painted scenery. I have seen plenty of ads that listed stock scenery or touring show scenery for sale, but never while the show was still running. Such was the case with The Forty Thieves. The advertisement stated, “To Managers, Borough Theatre and Opera House, Stratford. FOR SALE, the whole of the Magnificent scenery (by Richard Douglass, W. T. Hemsley, Esq., &c.), Armour (by White, Bond-street), and costly dresses, all designed and made for this marvelously successful Pantomime (splendid transformation scene, by W. Hillyard) “The Forty Thieves.” Can be seen any Evening during the show. Apply to W. H. Fredericks” (p. 28).

I want to take a moment to address Douglass’ reliance on The Era and other newspapers throughout the region. He was an avid reader, submitting corrections when necessary, such as his letter to the editor in 1897. On June 5, 1897, The Era published a correction, submitted to the editor by Richard Douglass:

“Richard Douglass’s Picture, To the Editor of the Era. Sir, – In your report of the Victorian Era Exhibition this week, you have given a very generous and eulogistic notice, to my picture of “Windsor Castle from the Brocas,” but you have not mentioned my name as the artist. Mr. Kiralfy, in his official guide to the Exhibition, has given my name in a special paragraph speaking of the picture. Yours truly, Richard Douglass (late of Standard Theatre). 9 Park-village East, Gloucester-gate, N. W. May 29^th, 1897” (p. 11).

It is understandable that Douglass was miffed with the omission. However, this letter combined with a life-time of advertisements made me step back and look at the big picture of Douglass’ relationship with newspapers.  Douglass was an extremely prolific scenic artist and performer. In fact, this may be one of the most well-publicized scenic artists who I have researched to date. There is a great possibility that he also compiled a scrapbook. I would be curious to know where his personal artifacts are now. If they survived and have been passed down to his descendants. So much of his work was described in newspaper reviews, articles, and want-ads.

In the last few years of the 19^th century, Douglass was still credited with numerous stock stage settings, including the stock scenery for the New Palace of Varieties in Dover and the Granville Theatre of Varieties (the new Music Hall at Walham-green). Productions included scenery for: Dick Dottiby’s Dream  at Queen’s Hall as part of the Pyrotechnic Popular Entertainments;  Henry IV at the Prince’s Theatre in Manchester (he was painting with Conrad Tritschler, the scenic artist at the venue); Louis Calvert’s touring production, Proof; John F. Sheridan’s touring production, When the Lamps are Lighted; Faust and Margaret by Brian Daly and C. W. Somerset, produced at the Royal Opera House, Leicester; A King of Fools produced at Grand Theatre, Islington; Keighley Entertainment Company’s Gipsy Jack at the Mechanics’ Institute; and the Christmas pantomime, Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves at the Empire Theatre Pantomime, Bristol (he was painting with J. Cox, the scenic artist at the venue).

And then the flood of public acknowledgements slowed to a trickle. It was about the same time that Douglass’ wife, Stella Brereton, also began placing advertisements and sharing her studio classes in several newspapers. On June 11, 1898, The Era announced, “Miss Stella Brereton (Mrs. Richard Douglass) had an “At Home” on Saturday last, at which some of her pupils recited (Miss Walker, Miss Maude Tibbitt, Miss Lillias Wilson, Miss Ella Challis, Mars. Spaldin)” (p. 12). She had transitioned from performing to teaching and was traveling throughout the region.  On Nov 18, 1898, The Nottinghamshire Guardian advertised an upcoming visit by Brereton to teach “Elocution and Deportment” classes (p. 14). She was listed as “Miss Stella Brereton, of the St. James, Drury-lane and Garrick Theatres.” The 1901 Census would also list her occupation as a “teacher” and “school educator.”

The Douglass household in 1901 also included Richard (55, Picture Restorer), and their two adult sons: Ernest (29, insurance agent) and Bertie (22, electrical engineer). Despite the new occupation listed for Richard, he was still performing and painting. His travels as a “comedian and entertainer” were described in newspapers across the country.  

On May 17, 1903. The Sunday Dispatch listed Douglass in the “People of the Day” section. The section, titled “Painted the Noted Scene at Earl’s Court” reported, “Mr. Richard Douglass, the well-known scenic artist, whose great picture of “Warwick Castle” in the grounds of the Earl’s Court Exhibition this season has created so much admiration, is one of the two brothers who some years back ran the Standard Theatre with sensational drama and sensational scenes. Mr. Douglass has now painted the large pictures annually shown in the Western Gardens of the Exhibition at Earl’s Court for some ten years past. Visitors will remember this artist’s previous pictures of “Windsor Castle,” “Richmond Hill,” “Balmoral Castle” &c. This year’s view of “Warwick” is considered by competent judges to be the finest of the series. Mr. Douglass has also another picture in the Western Garden, “Bothwell Castle,” on the Clyde; this also is a fine piece of colouring and effective work” (p. 9).

Douglass was also involved with the Scenic Artists’ Association. On Oct. 30, 1904, The Sunday People reported, “The Scenic Artists’ Association, under the presidentship of Mr. Hawes Craven (for so many years associated with the Lyceum production), and the vice-presidentship of Mr. Joseph Harker, has elected a council of Management for the present year Messrs. Walter Hann (chairman and treasurer), E. G. Banks, J. J. Markwell Davis, Richard Douglass, W. Hartford, W. T. Hemsley, H. W. Owen, W. Raphael, H. W. Robinson, W. B. Strong and George Twedell, with Mr. Stafford Hall, of Liverpool, as provincial representative. This committee are considering a proposal for the holding next month of the first their annual exhibitions of the works of scene painter – past and present – and scenic artist. Theatrical managers and others willing to lend models, sketches of scenes, portraits of scene painters, are invited to communicate with the secretary of the association, Mr. H. Lawrence Harris, 5 Robert-st., Adelphi-terrace, W. C.” 

By 1905, Douglass’ name began to disappear from the news, often solely attached to his wife’s advertisements – “Stella Brereton (Mrs. Richard Douglass).”  By 1908, Stella began to list herself as Stella Brereton Douglass. On June 4, 1908, The Daily Telegraph included the following advertisement, “Mrs. Stella Brereton Douglass, Professor of Elocution, Deportment and Acting. Patrons, Mrs. Kendall and Sir Theodore Marting, K. C. B. Amateur Theatrical stage-managed, and At Home. – 84, New Bond-street, W.”

Richard Douglass passed away three years later. On July 22, 1911, Douglass died at his son’s home (Ernest L. G. Douglass). That year, the 1911 Census listed the Douglass household in Finchley, as including: Leslie Douglass (head, 39), Margaret Douglass (wife 37), and Richard Douglass (father, 66).

Douglass died without much fanfare. No tributes were published in the news by fellow tradesmen or theatre personalities. I have located only one death notice. On July 25, 1911, The Daily Telegraph announced, “Deaths. Douglass. – On the 22^nd inst., at 36, Fortis-green-road, East Finchley, Samuel Richard Douglass, aged 67.”

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

My previous post explored the history of Normansfield, it’s theatre, and extant scenery collection.

The Normansfield Amusement Hall was completed in 1879, but theatrical entertainments had been produced at the facility for some time. Already in 1874, scenery and stage machinery were credited to theatre professionals.

On Jan. 2, 1875, The Surrey Advertiser and County Times published a detailed article about Normansfield productions entitled, “Hampton Wick. Entertainment at Normansfield” (p. 5). The article reported, “Perhaps few private theatres for [asylum residents] are better conducted than the one known as Normansfield at Hampton Wick, of which Dr. and Mrs. Langdon Down have sole charge. Indeed the gratifying results which have hitherto taken place at this asylum have been solely due to the kind treatment which the inmates have received at the hands of the prinicpals. At the end of the old year or the beginning of the new there is usually provided a theatrical entertainment, first of all for the amusement of the [residents], and repeated for the benefit of the friends invited by Dr. and Mrs. Downs and the performers, who are servants at the establishment… The performances took place this week, when there were three one act farces  played – “Master Jones’ Birthday,” “John Smith,” and “Boots at the Swan.” The actors and actresses were “old hands,” and of course could not be otherwise that well up in their respective parts. The performers included Mr. Walter Lee, Mr. Perceval Langdon Down, Mr. King, Mr. Reginald Langdon Down, Mr. Healy, Miss Graham, Miss Martin, Mr. Smith, Mr. F. Brockley, Miss M. Baxter, and Miss Reed. Between each act there was, as usual, vocal and instrumental music. The acting manager was Mrs. Langdon-Down; the stage director, Dr. Langdon-Down; the pianists, Mesdames Innes and Chapman; cornet, Mr. James; and prompter, Mr. Barry. The stage machinery was again under the control of Mr. Bradley, the scenery painted once more by Mr. Bull, and the costumes supplied, as in former years, by Mr. Fitch.”

The individual credited with scenic contributions was scenic artist, John Thomas Bull (1828-1890). By 1875, Bull had worked in the painting profession for at least 25 yrs. His son, J. T. Bull Jr. not only followed in his father’s footsteps, but also delivered scenery to the Normansfield Theatre.

Makers marks (studio stencils) on Normansfield Theatre scenery denote three periods of scenic artistry produced by the Bull family. The earliest dates from 1874 to 1879, and was produced when J. T. Bull was in a partnership with his brother, George Bull. The two established a partnership as decorators by 1866, adding scenic painting to their services over the years.

Their partnership continued until 1879 when it was dissolved, with J. T. Bull establishing his own firm at 134 New Kent Street – “J. T. BULL, SCENE PAINTER &c., 134 New Kent Road, London, S. E.”  1880 directories listed the new address, noting “Late of 54, Great Queen-street.)

Scenery credited to this firm includes two backdrops (beach and river), the false proscenium border (Grand border and tormentors), side wings (woodland and paneled-room and flats) and props (boat and mirror).  Although manufactured by Bull, some of the side-wings were overpainted by Richard Douglass at a later date.

The final stamp indicates the work by Bull’s son, a scenic concern that still listed the business address on Kent Street. Both of John’s sons, named John and Francis, followed in their father’s footsteps, listing that same address early on.

“J.T. Bull & Son, Scene Painter &c. 134 New Kent Road, London S.E.’ also appears on woodland scene flats (repainted and labeled by Richard Douglass at a later date) and a cut drop (labeled a walk-through cloth in conservation reports) that was deemed too fragile to photograph during documentation. Sadly, I have no reference for painting technique during this iteration of the Bull scenic art firm.

I am going to explore the history of the Bull family and their entry into the painting profession by the 1840s. John T. Bull (1828-1890) and George Bull (1830-1895) were brothers, coming of age and working in the various boroughs of following in their father’s trade as a tailor. By 1866, the two partnered to work as decorative artists. Between 1866 and 1879, their services included manufacturing and scenic art.

After the dissolution of J. T. & G. Bull in 1879, George Bull remained at 54 Great Queen St., working as a photographic scene painter until his passing in 1895. There is another familial aspect that adds to the confusion surrounding the name John Bull – BOTH John T. Bull and George Bull named their sons John Bull, and both worked as artists by the 1880s. John Bull was a family name, dating back generations from scenic artist John T. Bull. That being said, I am only going as far back as his father.

To clarify the Bull family lineage:

John Bull (Father, Tailor, 1804-1867)

John Thomas Bull (Son, Scenic Artist, 1828-1890) and his sons John T. Bull Jr. (Grandson, Scenic Artist, 1864-) and Francis Henry Bull (Grandson, Scenic Artist, 1871-1955)

George Bull (Son, Tailor and Photographic Scene Painter, 1830-1895) and his son John F. Bull (Grandson, Photographic Scene Painter, 1862-)

This family was not an easy one to research. There were an abundance of John Bulls in the 19th century. In addition to actual people with the name John Bull, there were fictional characters with the same name, including a satirical character that later personified the United Kingdom:

There was even the play John Bull: or, The Englishman’s Fireside.  

This five-act comedy was still playing at London’s Theatre Royal, Lyceum for the summer season in 1847. Here is the advertisement in The Times on Aug. 13, 1847:

And yes…there was even a newspaper that went by John Bull, c. 1820-1892.

Returning to the scenic artists, brothers John T. Bull and George Bull….

You will note that John T. Bull and his son (John T. Bull) continue to be listed as scenic artists or scene painters throughout the nineteenth century. George Bull and his son (John Bull) became photographic scene painters. The only difference is scale, as both used distemper paint (dry pigment paste combined with diluted hide glue).

A photographic scene painter is an artist who produces backdrops for photographers to use in their studios. For example, New York scenic artists Lafayette W. Seavey was well-known for photographic studio backings, as well as stage scenery, delivering his paintings throughout North America.

On Nov. 1, 1881, The Leadville Daily Herald reported, “One of the requirements of an excellent picture is to have backgrounds that will add to the beauty of the work, and as Mr. Brisbois entertains a full appreciation of this fact he has only the work of celebrated New York artist, L. W. Seavey, in his gallery, although they are procured at a price nearly five times as great as some of the less noted painters.” Here is an example of options for photographic backings included in an L. W. Seavey catalogue:

L. W. Seavey ran a large studio in New York City that accommodated the production of not only photographic backings, but also large-scale settings for live theatre.

If an artist, such as George Bull, were solely creating photographic backings, his studio space could be much smaller than a theatrical scene painting studio.  This may be one of the reasons why George Bull remained at 54 Great Queen St. and John T. Bull moved to a larger facility at 134 New Kent Road. 54 Great Queen St. Again the Great Queen St. space was a structure that could house up to five separate families (c. 1841), or one family and a small scenic studio (c. 1881).

To put this in context, I am going to share some Bull family genealogy. Here is a map to provide geographical context when I discuss various addresses. I added “walking distance” from Marylebone to Southwark to help with an overall understanding of the distances.

John Bull Sr. (1804-1867) and Maria Heaton Bull (1806-1878), married on Sept. 4, 1827, in St. Marylebone, Middlesex. The couple celebrated the birth of several children: John Thomas Bull (b. 1828), George Bull (b. 1830), James Bull (1832), Mary Ann Bull (b. 1835), Maria Louisa Bull (b. 1840), Margaret Bull (b. 1840), Ann Sophia Bull (b. 1844), and Reuben Bull (b. 1845).

John Bull (Sr.) and his father-in-law, Joseph Heaton, were tailors. George Bull initially followed in both his father’s and maternal grandfather’s footsteps, whereas his brother, John T. Bull, became an artist.

Here is the tale of John Thomas Bull…

John T. Bull was born on June 28, 1828, in Marylebone. When he was baptized a month later, the Bull address was listed as Castle St. East. His father was employed as a tailor.

The 1841 Census listed the Bull family living at All Souls and Trinity, St. Marylebone, Middlesex. The household included John Bull (36 yrs.), Mary (34 yrs.), John Jr. (12 yrs.).

Over the years, J. T. Bull would repeatedly state that his business was established in 1849. This would have been the year when he established his own firm. Bull was 21 yrs. old at the time; an average age to have completed an apprenticeship and other necessary training.

The 1851 Census listed J. T. Bull as an artist, living with his father John Bull (48 yrs., tailor), mother Maria Bull (47 yrs.) and four siblings – George (20 yrs. old, tailor), James (7 yrs.), Mary Ann (5 yrs.) and Margaret (1 yr.) The Bull family lived at 54 Great Queen St (St. Giles in the Fields). They were living in a large building that later housed five families (c. 1861). However, in 1851 there were only two families listed as living at 54 Great Queen Street; the Bull Family and the Joseph Dennis family (a coach maker).

On Sept. 6, 1856, John T. Bull married Margaret Esther Bull (b. 1827) at the Parish Church of St. Luke, Chelsea, Middlesex.  In their marriage records, John Thomas Bull listed his profession as a decorative artist, living at 28 Elizabeth Terrace. Margaret listed her address as 22 Sloane Street. They may have been related, as they shared the same surname; Margaret’s father was listed as James Bull, a tailor. However, this may have been a mistake, as records indicate that her parents were Joseph Bull (1790-1857) and Esther Bott (1801-1857). I have yet to find a definitive connection between their families.

By 1856, John and his brother George were listed as decorative artists, living at No. 54 Great Queen-Street, Lincoln’s-Inn. Their names were associated with the address when attempting to help a widow in need. On Nov. 21, 1856, The Times announced, “An urgent and stressing case – a poor aged widow, born 1779, is in very trying arrears of rent for a small room she occupies and greatly fears being turned into the streets and losing her few goods. She earnestly entreats ASSISTANCE from the benevolent, for she is in a most forlorn and destitute condition. For reference and subscriptions direct to Messrs. Bull, decorative artists, 54, Great Queen-Street, Lincoln’s-Inn-fields.” (p. 3).

There was a “Mr. Bull,” listed at the same address three years later. On Jan. 5, 1859, The Times advertised, “Mr. Bull selling a newfoundland dog and doghouse, “and over the distemper”-both being sold as the owner was leaving town, listing No. 54 Great Queen-Street, Lincoln’s-Inn.” This is about the same time that the J. T. Bull’s parents, John Bull Sr. and Maria Bull, moved to Chelsea South, leaving the expanding families of John Bull Jr. and George Bull to live at 54 Great Queen St. Both John Jr. and George were listed as decorative artists, living in was a multi-unit building that housed five families in 1861. George’s household included Henrietta (wife, 33 yrs.), George W. (son, 3 yrs., and Henrietta M. (1 yr.). John’s household included his wife Margaret and 11 yrs. old niece, A. L. Palmer. Their niece was likely helping out, as John and Maria Bull celebrated the birth of their first child that spring. On May 3, 1861Margaret Esther Maria Bull (1861-1930) was born in St. George, Bloomsbury, Middlesex. A son followed three years later in 1864; John Bull (1864-1943) was born in St. Giles, London.

In 1866, John T. Bull and his brother George Bull advertised as scene painters in The Era, listing their address as 54 Great Queen-Street, Lincoln’s-Inn, W. C., London.

The 1871 Census Report listed the John T. Bull and George Bull families living at the same address -54 Great Queen St. At the time both men were listed as scene painters. John ‘s household erroneously listed him by his middle name, Thomas Bull (head, 42 yrs. old), and only included Margaret Bull (wife, 42 yrs.) and Harriet Clark (servant, 26 yrs.). His three children (10 yrs. old Margaret and 7 yrs. old John; Francis was born in 1871) were not included at this household. George Bull’s household Henrietta Bull (wife, 44 yrs.), George William Bull (son, 13 yrs.), and Edwin Thomas Bull (son 7 yrs.), and Emily Kirby Bull (daughter, 2 yrs.). His other two children (11 yrs. old Henrietta Maria Bull and 9 yrs. old John Frederick Bull) were not included in the household. It may have been the case where the children were temporarily split up, or visiting relatives. Such was the case with George Bull’s eldest child in 1861. That year, 3-yrs.-old George Bull Jr. was counted twice in the census; once at the household of his parents, and once at the household of his paternal grandfather in Chelsea. Census reports are somewhat unreliable this way; timing is everything, as well as the capabilities of the census reporter.

J. T. & G. Bull’s partnership lasted for almost a decade. On April 25, 1875, The Morning Post announced that the partnership – J. T. Bull and G. Bull, Great Queen-street, Lincoln’s-inn-fields, scene painters – was dissolved (p. 7). George continued to paint at the address, while John moved into a larger studio on New Kent St. That same year, a “Mr. Bull” was credited with painting scenery for the entertainments at Normansfield. (Jan. 2, 1875, The Surrey Advertiser and County Times, p. 5) The article reported, “The stage machinery was again under the control of Mr. Bradley, the scenery painted once more by Mr. Bull, and the costumes supplied, as in former years, by Mr. Fitch.”

It is important to note that both Bradley and Bull had worked on previous theatrical entertainments at Normansfield. This was not their first year at the facility.

When the Amusement Hall at Normansfield was completed, J. T. Bull advertised the sale of a used scenery collection. On Jan. 26 and Feb. 9, 1879, following advertisement was published in The Era:

“Handsome Fit-Up For Sale, nearly New, Painted by J. T. Bull. Front Proscenium, height, 19 ft.; Proscenium Sides, width, 4 ft.; Act-Drop, Beautifully Painted, height, 15 ft., width, 13 ft 6 in; Two front Proscenium Wings, with return pieces and doors, 6 in by 8 ft. 6 in; Two Chamber Wings, 10 ft. by 4 ft.; Two Drapery Borders, 14 ft. by 5 ft. May be seen at the Theatre of Varieties, Southend, Essex. Useful Stock scenery required, about 17 ft. by 15 ft.”

Bull placed another advertisement the next summer. On August 13 and Sept. 7, 1879, Bull advertised a portable stage with scenery in The Era:

“Handsome Portable Fit-Up For Sale, In consequence the premises being sold. Well adapted for a Hall or for Amateur Clubs &c. It is well Painted, and nearly new, by J. T Bull. Not a Daub. Height of Proscenium, 19 ft.; Width, 24 ft.; Opening, 16 ft., by 12 ft. 6 in. Act-Drop, Proscenium, Wings, with Return Pieces and Doors, Front Chambers with Folding-doors, Two Chamber Wings, Two Boarders, well-made Portable Stage, Foot and Top Lights. Address, Managers, Varieties, Southend, Essex, where the above may be seen.”

The use of portable stages in both halls and ballrooms was commonplace throughout the nineteenth century. Many theatre managers wanted the versatility of a space that could serve as both a performance space and ballroom. Such is the case at the Adelina Patti Theatre where the floor of the hall can be raised level to the stage floor.

The sale of used scenery in the nineteenth century was very common. In act, I have traced numerous second-hand collections that were refurbished and installed in new venues. In some cases, used scenery was taken in as credit on the purchase of new scenery. Second-hand scenery maintained its value. Even scenery that remained on site was touched up or completely repainted.

Some scenery painted by Bull for the Normansfield Theatre was repainted by Richard Douglass. His stencil covers an underlying one. I have repeatedly encountered this in many historic scenery collections at North American Theatres. Also, some theatre owners did not realize that they were purchasing previously used scenery.

Interestingly, in 1879, Richard Douglass was also selling used scenery, listing his address as Painting-room at the National Standard Theatre, Bishopsgate.  His advertisements were place near Bulls in the newspaper.  

On May 7, 1880, advertisements place by John T. Bull in The Era note:   “J. T. Bull, Scenic Artist, Scenery Painted and Lent on Hire Address, 134, New Kent-road, S. E.. Late of 54, Great Queen-street.”

The 1881 Census listed John T. Bull’s family living at 134 New Kent Road, Newington, in the Borough of Lambeth, London. This address was in the London Borough of Southwark. In 1881 the Bull household included: John T. (52, Theatrical Scene Painter), Margaret E. (wife, 52), Margaret E. M. Bull (daughter, 19), John (son, 17, Theatrical Scene Painter), Francis H. (10), and Joseph W. Smith (19, servant). Both of his sons, John and Francis, followed him in the scene painting profession.

On Nov. 25, 1882, The Era  published another Bull advertisement, listing the establishment year as 1849.

On November 10, 1890, scenic artist J. T. Bull (Sr.) passed away. After John T. Bull Sr.’s passing, the scenic studio of J. T. Bull & Son was established.

There are a few aspects of the name change that I find particularly interesting, as J. T. Bull and son was not in place before the father’s passing. I would love to explore this more in a future post, but for now, I want to mention that the widow of J. T. Bull was also listed as a scenic artist in two census reports. The 1891 Census reports listed Margaret Bull (widow of John T. Bull) as head of the household in Newington. London. She was living with the two sons, John (27 yrs.) and Francis H. (19 yrs.); all three listed their occupation as “scene painter.” This was not a typographical error, as Margaret was again listed as a scene painter ten years later in the 1901 census, with the additional designation of “employer.” I wonder if Margaret continued her husband’s business, keeping the name and adding her son – for J. T. Bull.

There is one other thing to keep in mind. In 1891, Margaret’s brother-in-law George Bull (60 yrs.) and her nephew, John F. Bull (29 yrs.), are working as a photographic scene painters at 54 Great Queen St.

The firm of J. T. Bull & Son continued to thrive, repeatedly making news throughout the 1890s.  On August 5, 1892, The Times published an article about the newly-renovated Egyptian Hall reporting, “new scenery by J. T. Bull and Son.”

On May 11, 1895, The Era described the work at the newly-constructed Canning Town’s Public Hall, reporting: “The fit-up was a model of compactness, and this, and the admirably painted scenery reflected great credit on Messrs. J. T. Bull and Sons, by whom they were supplied” (p. 7).

On Jan. 18, 1896, The Era: “Amusements in Nottingham…Grand Theatre, A Midsummer Night’s Dream…Some charming scenery has been painted by Messrs. J. T. Bull and H. J. Pedgeon…” (p. 18). Bull Jr. was working with Henry James Pedgeon (1869-1928), a scenic artist associated with theaters in Oldham (Colosseum) and Plymouth (Royal Theatre and Grand Theatre).

On June 10, 1896, Francis Henry Bull Bull married Harriet Agnes McGowan (1872-1963). On July 22, 1896, his older brother, John Bull, married Effie Grace Purkiss (1871-1938) at Saint Matthew, Ashford, Surrey.

John and Effie celebrated the birth of their first child, Edgar Frederic John Bull in 1898, with Vera Mary Bull arriving four years later. Both children were born in West Norwood, Surrey.

Francis and Harriet Bull celebrating the birth of their first child, Reginald Francis Bull the in 1899. Francis continued to work as both a scenic artist and sculptor. By 1901, settled with his family in Dulwich, Camberwell, London.

Throughout 1897, “J. T. Bull & Son, Theatrical Scene Painters” placed full-page ads London’s  The Theatre (a magazine published in London between 1877-1897): “J. T. Bull & Son, Theatrical Scene Painters. Every Description of Theatrical Scenery on Hire, Suitable for Halls, Drawing Rooms,  Bazaars,  &cc. Tableaus Vivants a Specialty. Platforms, Gas-Fittings, and Limelight supplied. Estimates Free. Head Office: 134, New Kent Road, London, S.E. Painting  Room:  New Kent Road.  Manufactory: Munton Road.“

Advertisements stated that the firm had been established in 1854. As with most scenic studios, establishment years are somewhat fluid and change over time.  In this case, J. T. Bull had not been working with his son since that year but had been active in the theatrical scene painting business since that time.

1897 advertisements also noted that the firm has been “Specially engaged by Mr. Wilson Barrett to paint scenery for English and American Touring Companies of The Sign of the Cross.  Bull also included testimonials from past clients that included: Mr. J. N. Maskelyne of The Egyptian Hall, London; Ben Greet of the Town Hall, Dover; Sire George Pigot of Pembroke Lodge; L. C. Venables of the Surrey Masonic Lodge; and Thomas Whitford of Montrose College for an amateur production of The Mikado.

On Dec.11, 1897, The Era announced that the Hampstead Dramatic Society’s, St. George’s Hall, performance of Walker, London, “The new scene, a pretty bit of up-river landscape was specially painted by J. T. Bull & Son, of New-Kent road.”

Life began to change for John Bull by the late 1890s. In 1899, John T. Bull  became a Freemason. Grand Lodge of England records list John Bull, was initiated at the age of 35 yrs. old on April 6, 1899, listing profession, scenic artist, Crystal Palace Lodge No. 742.

During this time, the scenic artistry of Francis H. Bull (J. T. Bull Jr.’s little brother, 1871-1955) also began to make news. On Jan. 21, 1899, The Era described a woodland scene for The Coriscan Brothers: “…the scenic artist, to whose artistic skill was due to the pretty piece of woodland labelled the Forest of Fontainbleu…was the brushwork of Mr. Francis H. Bull, and we hereby give him credit for his artistic and most effective picture” (p. 21). That year, Francis H. Bull was credited with scenery for the Theatre Royal in Chatham, a new playhouse erected by Charles and Lionel Barnard in High Street, Chatham. On August 5, 1899, The Era reported, “Most of the scenery, including the handsome act-drop, is from the studio of Mr. Francis H. Bull. Mr. Bull has worked into the drop two doors, and entrance and exit for the use of the players taking a call” (p. 7) From 1905-1930, Francis Henry Bull listed his studio at 4 Lower Bland St. SE1.

On Nov. 29, 1899, The Daily Telegraph reported that a “Donation for Our Soldiers’ Widows and Orphans Fund included scenery by “J. T. Bull and Son, 134, New Kent-road, Scenic Artists, and Employes” (p. 6). That spring, The Daily Telegraph announced,“Messrs. J. T. Bull and Son, 134, New Kent-road, are still willing to supply scenery free for performances in aid of the War Fund”( 21 Mar 1900. p. 4).

Work continued to plug along for John T. Bull that year. On June 2, 1900, The Era noted another scenic installation at the Theatre Royal in Ryde after the venue changed hands: “A new act drop has been executed by Mr. J. T. Bull, the principle feature being a view of Osborne House.” Later in the year, Bull delivered new scenery for a production of Riding Hood at the Public Hall in Hastings. On Dec. 29, The Era reported, “The scenery is effective and is the work of Mr. J. T. Bull of London, who has also designed the properties and mechanical effects.”

The 1901 Census listed the John T. Bull household as including John Bull (head, 37 yrs., Scenic Artist Manager), Effie Bull (wife, 30 yrs.), Edgar Bull, son, 3 yrs.), Margaret E. Bull (mother, 73 yrs. Scene Painter, employer), and Elimily Moore (17 yrs. old general servant).

Newspaper notices describing the scenic work by J. T. Bull & Son began to somewhat dwindle after 1904, but picked up again by 1911.  On March 9, 1904, The Times listed the auction of Bull’s scenery for St. George’s Chapel, Abermarle Street, Piccadilly. The announcement reported, “Other lots consisted of a complete set of stage scenery for The Bells by Leopold Lewis, painted by Messrs. J. T. Bull and Sons, comprising seven drop scenes, one gauze ditto, and 14 wings, together with staging on tressels, foot and top lights, snow-box, &c. – L15.

On Jan. 3, 1905, The Daily Mirror announced that The Coming Race at St. George’s Hall was painted y Mr. J. T. Bull and Mr. McCleery” (p. 6). J. T. Bull & Sons had not closed, but was slowly changing. Bull would continue to work with McCleery on other projects over the years, including

In 1905, an auction took place at the Bull studio, 134 New Kent Road. On June 1, 1905, The Daily Telegraph announced the sale of a stock of theatrical scenery by Bingham & Boughton (p. 4).

There is much more to tell about the scenic art careers of both J. T. Bull Jr. and Francis H. Bull, but that is a tale for another time. My next post will be about scenic artist Richard Douglass.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Mike Hume and I drove to the Langdon Down Centre in Teddington, London, on August 9, 2024. We had scheduled an appointment with Facilities Manager, Jo Hardie, to visit the 1879 Normansfield Theatre. We were fortunate that Adam Harrison, Mark Fox, and Jane Harrison could join us for the day!

This is a rare, Victorian Grade II* listed theatre with a remarkable scenery collection that consists of 80 flats, 18 borders, and 5 backdrops. I have recently discovered that some of the pieces pre-date the actual theatre! Painted replicas have replaced all the extant scenery, but many pieces remain accessible to the public.

This facility, once known as Normansfield, was established by Dr. John Langdon Haydon Down and his wife Mary Crellin Down in 1868. The building was constructed to care for people with learning disabilities, a condition now known as Down’s Syndrome.

Today’s post will focus on the Normansfield Theatre –both past and present. The scenic artists who delivered stage settings to Normansfield Theatre will be the topic of my next few posts.

Dr. John Langdon Haydon Down (1828-1896) and his wife, Mary Crellin Down, opened Normansfield in 1868. As the Langdon Down Centre website explains “Normansfield was a family home and a place where people with learning disabilities could be cared for and educated at a time when most of them would have been condemned to life in an asylum.”

Normansfield was a dramatic departure from 19^th century asylums that housed individuals suffering from a variety of mental conditions. Dr. Down believed that those with congenital conditions should not be housed with those who had lost their sense of reason. This was an extremely progressive stance to take at the time!

Dr. and Mrs. Down were dedicated to improving and elevating the lives of those at Normansfield, with activities included theatricals, dancing, croquet, basketry, needlework, loom rug and many more activities.

An entertainment hall was added to Normansfield as part of the care and education of Normansfield residents.

On June 28, 1879, The Surrey Advertiser and County Times published a lengthy article on the formal opening of the new pavilion, wing, and halls (p. 3). In an inaugural address, Dr. Down explained the history and goals at Normansfield.

I am including the following excerpt from his speech, as it really sums up the progress made by Dr. Down prior to opening the amusement hall, now known as Normansfield Theatre:  

“A previously uninhabited and partially completed home was secured, on what was then a potato field. The house was finished, and the field was converted into a garden. Normansfield seemed a suitable name for the field, and it was then, for I was urged on and encouraged in my plan by my ever-to-be remembered friend, the later Mr. Norman Wilkinson, well known as the first patron of David Cox of Brockey, and the devoted friend of man an earnest man. In 1869 it was felt that more room would be needed, and with the professional advice of Mr. Rowland Plumbe [the architect], the son of the lady who first called public attention to the subject, the present building was foreshadowed. It was determined to add by degrees, but also that nothing should be done which would interfere with the realization of the complete idea. Accordingly, in 1869, the south wing was partially built. This gradually filled, and in 1872 it was determined to finish the south wing and subsequently build a block called the north block to correspond with the original structure, or what is now called the south block. Gradually pupils were attracted from all parts of the world – from India, the West Indies, Siam, Persia, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, France and every part of the British Isles. Additional land was sought for and procured to meet the requirements of what was felt to be an increasing institution. Two years ago, it was decided to commence the hall in which we are now assembled, and the Kindersaal [children’s hall] below, and to communicate with the main building by means of a glass covered way. Before, however, the hall was half finished – the existing accommodation being gradually absorbed – it was determined to build the north wing, which now unites the hall and Kindersaal [children’s hall] to the north block, in lieu of the temporary glass-covered way. Before this was done, it was felt for architectural effect, but still more for complete organization of the establishment, the central pavilion should no longer be delayed. Simultaneously with these additions, four villas were purchased in order to provide in one sanatorium for the isolation of those who might be suspected of having infectious diseases, and in the others provision for patients whose special wants might be better met by life in a small family, while having the advantages of the discipline, training, and amusements of the establishment. The field of four acres by accretions has expanded into 40 acres. The last eleven year, however, has not been merely a period of growth, it has also been one of development – a staff nearly 100 in number, whose devotion to their duty has never been surpassed, has grown up in this nucleus, and I should but ill perform my part did not their publicly recognize an enthusiastic love for their work, which has helped to make the name Normansfield known beyond the immediate neighborhood of its location, and enabled me to carry out one of the great aims of my life, viz., to provide the highest possible culture, the best physical, moral, and intellectual training, and to open out fresh realms of happiness for a class who have the strongest claims on our sympathy and for who, till lately so little has been done.”

It is important to understand that theatrical entertainments, complete with scenery and stage machinery, occurred well before the construction of Normansfield’ years earlier’s amusement hall.

On Jan. 2, 1875, The Surrey Advertiser and County Times published an article entitled, “Entertainment at Normansfield” (p. 5) The article reported, “Indeed the gratifying results which have hitherto taken place at this asylum have been solely due to the kind treatment which the inmates have received at the hands of the principals. At the end of the old year or the beginning of the new there is usually provided a theatrical entertainment, first of all for the amusement of the [residents], and repeated for the benefit of the friends invited by Dr. and Mrs. Downs and the performers, who are servants at the establishment…between each act there was, as usual, vocal and instrumental music. The acting manager was Mrs. Langdon-Down; the stage director, Dr. Langdon-Down; the pianists, Mesdames Innes and Chapman; cornet, Mr. James; and prompter, Mr. Barry. The stage machinery was again under the control of Mr. Bradley, the scenery painted once more by Mr. Bull, and the costumes supplied, as in former years, by Mr. Fitch.”

The life and career of J. T. Bull will be the subject of my next post.

It was the success of these early theatrical entertainments that fueled Dr. Down’s desire to build a proper theatre for the children in 1877.

Over the years, Normansfield’s Theatre expanding their scenic offerings, eventually amassing a collection that eventually boasted over 100 pieces. A photographic display for the Heritage Lottery funded project, Normansfield – Protecting a Theatrical Past explains, “The scenery collection was made for the Normansfield Theatre and were well cared for in their day, however, they remained largely unseen and forgotten from the 1950’s onwards….The survival of this unique collection of Victorian scenery, came to the attention of theatre historian’s in the 1980’s. A team of specialist, including Dr. David Wilmore and Dr. Colin Sorenson form the Museum of London, began to list and photograph the scenery in 1984…13 years later, the Theatre Trust, with financial support from the Friends’ of Normansfield, was able to commission the Textile Conservation Centre, to survey the scenery and report on its condition. A Conservation Plan was put in place by John Earl while all the materials were carefully wrapped and stored properly and securely. The scenery was restored. Today, this collection is the largest Victorian collection of scenery in the UK. The Stage itself still contains the original working flaps and is only one of two theatres with this is place today. The scenery on the stage today is a painted replica of the original, due to the fragile nature of the scenery.”

Here are five of the eight framed pieces in storage at the Langdon Down Centre, once used at Normansfield Theatre.

The history about the documentation, preservation, and storage of the Normansfield Theatre Scenery Collection is absolutely fascinating! Here are three articles about the project, published by the Down’s Syndrome Association:

Dr. Langdon Down’s Normansfield Theatre, written by John Earl, provides an extensive history of not only the entertainment hall, but also the lives and good works of the Downs. Although out of print, a few used copies sporadically appear at online bookstores.

I first learned about the Normansfield Theatre in 2016, when Dr. Wilmore presented a paper about the historic scenery collection. It was for an international theatre conference in Stockholm (OISTAT Research Committee meeting event).

I was amazed that many pieces of the scenic pieces in the extant collection included studio stamps.

Normansfield Theatre was again the topic of two papers this summer, both presented at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House Conference. Dr. Wilmore shared the discovery of portrait panels from the original Gilbert & Sullivan production of “Ruddygore” [later Ruddigore, Savoy Theatre, 1887], currently on display at the Normansfield Theatre.

Despite significant deterioration, the scenic art is absolutely exquisite!

For the Tyne Theatre & Opera House conference, Karen Thompson also presented a paper that focused on Normansfield’s scenery collection.

Thompson was the project manager for the conservation of the Normansfield Theatre Scenery. A full documentation took place in 1997, with a conservation methodology plan recommended by 2001. Between 2003-2005 conservation and storage of the scenery took place. Thompson and Frances Lennard published “Normansfield Theatre Scenery: Materials and Construction Revealed Through Conservation,” detailing many of their discoveries.

A week after the conference, we visited Normansfield Theatre, hoping to see as much extant scenery as possible. The historic scenery collection was placed in an ingenious storage system below the hall. 

Although designed to be easily accessible for viewing, the space is now also used for storage, so the rolling units remain quite compact. During my visit, we could only create a narrow walking path to examine painted details.

Other extant scenery not as accessible, stored in an upstage area at the theatre, connected to the stage by a pair of loading doors.

My next few posts will explore the lives and careers of scenic artists who painted scenery for Normansfield Theatre.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

This is the final post about my trip to the Adelina Patti Theatre in Craig Y Nos, Wales, on August 7, 2024.

Scenic artist, Walter Hann, was the subject of my previous post, exploring the his creation of the stock scenery collection. The act drop for the theatre was painted by another London artist – Daniel T. White.

An illustration of Patti’s new act drop was published in Western Mail on August 13, 1891.

The article, entitled “Opening of the Patti Theatre at Craig-Y-Nos,” reported, “Upon entering the house the visitor is struck by the beauty of detail sown everywhere in this miniature opera house. Before him rises the act drop, which is an elegant picture, by White, of London, of the prima donna in the character of Semiramide driving a chariot and pair of horses…The act drop, which is an elegant picture, by White, of London, of the prima donna in the character of Semiramide driving a chariot and a pair of horses.”

At the time I read the article, I had no idea that “White, of London” was actually Daniel Thomas White. My mind initially whirled, as I contemplated several nineteenth-century scenic artists named White. So, with only a common surname and a large city, there was very, very little information to start. Regardless, I knew that “Mr. White, of London” was no amateur artist, local hire, or talented youth at the beginning of his career.

For many nineteenth-century theaters, stock scenery collections and act drops were created by two different artists. Unlike standard stock scenes, the painting act drops (also referred to drop curtains or front drops in North America) required an extensive skill set, as well as familiarity with all subjects matter, including the painting of drapery, ornament, architecture, landscape, animals and figures.

On Dec. 18, 1894, in The Philadelphia Inquirer reported: “[The act drop] is the most expensive piece of furniture in any playhouse. Managers are most solicitous about the care of a handsome drop curtain than almost any other appointment in the theatres. They are usually painted by the artists of wide fame in the peculiar branch of art which they represent, whose charges for the work range from $1000 to $3000.”

A year later, The Magazine of Art published an article written by W. Telbin entitled, “Art in the Theatre: Act-Drops.” In 1895, he wrote, “…in the interval between acts a painted canvas, either representing drapery or other form of decoration, or a landscape (classical mostly), has been used. A commission to paint this canvas was always sought for by the scene-painter, for it was, and is, comparatively speaking, the only durable record of his work. Such a commission was considered a diploma of merit of the highest order, only falling into the hands of those of the ripest experience.”

My quest to track down “White, of London,” started with the opera. Semiramide is a two-act opera by Gioachino Rossini, based on the legendary figure Semiramis of Assyria who was heralded for her intellect, military leadership, and beauty.

I was surprised to find that Adelina Patti is frequently mentioned in various histories written about Semiramide. She performed the title role as part of the Cincinnati Opera Festival in 1882. This annual event not only featured world-class performers, but also featured well-known scenic artists from England, Europe, and the United States. On Jan. 16, 1882, the Chattanooga Daily Times provided a little context for the event, reporting, “The first Opera Festival realized the intentions of its founders, excelling as it did, in lyric, dramatic, and scenic splendor, any previous performance ever given in this country, if not in Europe; yet the second Festival will be more complete and attractive than any predecessor. The principal operas to be given are: “Fidelio,” Beethoven; “William Tell,” Rossini; “The Huguenots,” Meyerbeer; “Magic Flute,” Mozart. These splendid works of great composers will be presented with a magnificence and completeness heretofore unequaled. The scenery, costumes, and the stage properties of these great opera have been prepared in Italy, at a great expense, by Colonel Mapleson. The scenery, painted by Magnani, the greatest of living scenic artists, is elaborate and exceedingly beautiful.”  Other scenic artists associated with the Festival between 1881 and 1882 included Charles Fox, F. S. Humphreys, D. B. Hughes, John, Rettig, DeWitt C. Waugh, H. E. Burcky, and many others.

Col. Mapleson, named impresario for the Festival, was the key link between the Cincinnati Opera Festival and Adelina Patti. It was Mapleson who brought Patti overseas for her London debut in 1861, and Mapleson who brought her back to the United States for a, 1881. On Feb. 20, 1881, The Cincinnati Enquirer announced in “Opera Festival Notes” – “Adelina Patti will be the prima-donna at the Opera Festival next year” (p. 12). Interestingly, this was a week after the same newspaper announced, “Adelina Patti gets $3,000 for every performance she gives” (14 Feb 1881, p. 1). Patti consistently made American news throughout the early 1880s, even when performing in other countries. For many Americans, she was a household name.

It was Patti’s time spent in Cincinnati that made me contemplate if “White, of London” was actually the Cincinnati-based African-American scenic artist Solomon E. White (1841-1912). There were a few things that caused me to go down this particular rabbit hole. Solomon White had made a name for himself by the 1860s, working at the National Theatre, Robinson’s Opera House, Freeman’s Theatre, and Wood’s Theatre. He was a free African-American male who travelled all over the country to complete a variety of painting projects, including residential murals, oil paintings, and public artworks. Solomon White’s story is quite remarkable, but there is a period (c. 1885-1895) when he disappears from print – a time that coincides with the planning and construction of Patti’s Theatre. I had often considered that the omission of White’s name from North American newspapers at this time possibly indicated work abroad; a common occurrence for African-American theatre artists who sought friendlier receptions on foreign shores. This was also a period in American history accentuated by increased hostilities against Black communities. Amazingly, an artist named “Mr. S. E. White” was exhibiting in England at this time, including at the eleventh annual exhibition of the Sheffield Society of Artists in 1885 (Sheffield and Rotherham Independent 12 August 1885, p.3).

In the end, I traced the lives and careers of well over 100 other scenic artists with the same surname.  This meant looking at alternative spellings too, such as Whyte and Whaite. Many nineteenth-century scenic artists working in the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia are now in my database, including Septimus Whaite, Marmaduke “Duke” John Horton White, Eugene N. White, Frank H. White, H. O. White, J. B. White, James H. White, James V. White, John White, T. White, and Walter White, to name a few.

Just about the time I was ready to give up, I stumbled across the following article, published in The Era on October 25, 1868: “The Commencement of the season at the Haymarket Theatre is an event of some importance in the dramatic world, and on Monday night last a large audience assembled to welcome Miss Bateman on her return to the London stage. A fortnight since we recorded the principal features of the new decorations and embellishments which have been executed in such perfect taste under the immediate superintendence of Mr. John O’Connor, Mr. Buckstone’s principal scenic artist. The co-operation of Mr. W. Telbin, Mr. E. C. Barnes, and Mr. Daniel T. White has resulted in the most advantageously, and the Theatre now presents a remarkably chaste and elegant appearance. It will be remembered the above-named gentlemen are respectively answerable for the new act-drop (representing Tasso reciting a poem at Venice), the magnificent allegorical painting on the proscenium, and the four medallion portraits of Shakespeare, Ben Johnson, Garrick, and Sheridan. The two groups of Cupids (one in each spandrel) are also painted by the clever young artist Mr. D. T. White. As regards the act-drop, the name W. Telbin is a guarantee that he picturesque subject chosen would be treated in the highest style of art. The whole of this Venetian picture is suffused with the rich glow of sunset, and Mr. Telbin’s reputation as a colourist if fully sustained.”

This article places White within prestigious scenic art circle as an up-and-coming “clever young artist.” Here is his tale…

Daniel Thomas White was born on April 19, 1843. Baptized on July 7, 1843, at Saint Mary-St. Marylebone Road, St. Marylebone, London, he was the son of a chemist, Daniel White (1801-1886), and Caroline Docwra (1811-1893). In 1843, the White family resided at 19 Park Terrace.

He is another scenic artist that links the painting and chemistry trades, continuing a topic in my recent posts about Edmund Handby (Victoria Hall, Settle) and George Rivers Higgins (Georgian, Theatre, Richmond).

Daniel T. White Jr. was the second youngest son of several children born to the couple. His siblings included: Edmund White (b. 1831-1915), Jane Margaret White (1833-?), George Farr White (1836-1900), Frances “Fanny” Anne White (1838-), Elizabeth Caroline White (1840-1840), Louisa White (1841-1931), and William Edwin White (1844-1915). The 1851 Census listed Daniel T. White as one of several children living with their maternal aunt Jane M. Docwra (1890-1895), in Hatfield Mill (Mill Green) in Hertfordshire, England. Jane Docwra was Caroline White’s oldest sister; their parents were William Docwra (1784-1852) and Elizabeth Farr (1786-1812).

In 1851, Daniel’s Aunt Jane was clearly listed as the head housekeeper at Mills House. Her household included the following children: Caroline White (11 yrs., niece), Louisa White (9 yrs., niece), Daniel White (7 yrs., nephew) and William White (6 yrs., nephew). Although the entry of each child’s occupation is somewhat illegible, it looks like “paint pupils.” Docwra’s household also included lodger George Harrison, noted as the Millers foreman.

Meanwhile, Daniel’s parents and three older siblings (Edmund, Jane and George) were living at 19 Park Terrace, Christchurch Parish, Middlesex County. For geographical context, this is approximately 42 miles south of Hatfield, near London. Both Edmund White and Jane White were part of the family business, listed as assistant chemists.

Now, I was extremely curious about this whole living situation, so I started looking at previous census reports. It seems that when the White children were quite small, they lived with their Aunt Jane,. Once they were old enough to support help their father as assistant chemists, they returned home. In 1841, Jane White (7 yrs.), George White (5 yrs.), Fanny White (3 yrs.), Charles White (3 yrs.) and Caroline White (1 yr.) all lived with Aunt Jane in Hatfield. However, at that time Jane Docwra’s occupation was listed as “Ink.”

There is a big problem census reports and young children, as that a lot can happen over the course of ten years. Unless they make news (death, marriage, or a legal matter), it is difficult to follow their lives.

By 1861, Daniel White Jr. and his sister Frances were the only children living with their parents at Christchurch Parish, St. Marylebone, Middlesex. That year, the White household included: Daniel White Sr. (60 yrs.), Caroline White (50 yrs.), Frances White (23 yrs.), Daniel White Jr. (17 yrs.) and their servant Mary Cooper.  This was about the same time that Daniel should have entered the scenic art profession, as an apprentice or assistant. Unfortunately, no occupation was listed for him in the 1861 census, not even as his father’s assistant.

It was during the 1860s, however, that Daniel T. White showed promise as an artist and began exhibiting his paintings. On April 7, 1867, The Era described a painting by D. T. White in an article entitled, “French and Flemish Gallery of Paintings for 1867.” The article reported, “Among the social and familiar every-day incidents of life, which the French artist catches up with such gusto and avidity, and out of which he always contrives to work a good picture, we wish to draw attention to No. 208, In the Bois de Boulogne, by D. T. White. The subject is the early advances of a French soldier on the affections of a middle-aged nursemaid, or bonne, who while listening to the gallant wooer, allows her charges to take care of themselves. This picture, as an illustration of character, is a study.

I want to pause here to also note that were other individuals named Daniel White at this time, men who also went by D. T. White.

The scenic artist who painted Adelina Patti’s act-drop is Daniel Thomas White (1843-1908), the son of chemist Daniel White (1801-1886). However, throughout my research, I noticed that a lot of art historians confuse the dates and activities of four different men – each named Daniel White. In addition to Daniel Thomas White and his father, there was an art dealer and another artist named Daniel White.

For example, on March 10, 1868, The Daily Telegraph noted the passing of Daniel White on Feb. 5, listing him as a “Dealer in works of art, No. 45 Maddox-street, Bond-street, Oxford-street in county of Middlesex”(March 10, 1868, p. 1). This is neither the father nor the son in my story. Daniel Thomas White’s father (Daniel White Sr.) passed away on Sept. 7, 1886. Unfortunately, the art dealer also appears in numerous historic records as D. T. White – hence, the confusion. The Royal Academy listing for D. T. White notes “(fl. 1850-fl 1864) Art dealer based in Maddox Street, London.”

AND… there is a second family of London artists with the patriarch named Daniel White. I want to make sure that people don’t confuse this individual with the scenic artist who painted the Patti act drop. The 1911 census lists 71-yrs. old-widower and artist, Daniel White, living with his three sons in St. Marylebone. His sons were Arthur Charles White (son, 37 yrs., artist), Percy Alfred White (son, 34 yrs., artist), and Charles Daniel White (son, 29, insurance clerk). This Daniel White (son of Thomas and Harriet White) worked at various 19th-century trades, including tin plate work. He died in 1921 and is buried in the same plot with his eldest son, Arthur Charles White (1876-1943). Again, this is a completely separate family.

There is even a stage character named Daniel White from a comic drama written by  H. T. Craven; a production titled MILKY WHITE.

Unreal.

Advertisements that appear from the 1860s onward really threw a screw in the works. For example, here is a Want Ad in The Era, published on March 21, 1885 (p. 20).

I am certain that Daniel Thomas White (1843-1908), son of Daniel White (1801-1886), is the “White, of London” who painted the act drop for Adelina Patti’s Theatre. He assisted scenic artist, John O’Connor, throughout the 1860s.

On Oct. 18, 1869, The Times advertised: “TREASURE TROVE, Operetta, at 7. The music by Offenbach. The scene by Mr. F. Lloyds. Characters by Miss Susan Pyne, Miss Henrietta Everard, Miss Bessie Loviel, Mr. Frank Crellin, and Mr. Henry Broughton. At the conclusion of the Operetta, a New Act Drop, “King Charles Leaving St. James’s Palace for the Play,” painted by O’Connor (the figures by Mr. D. T. White) will be exhibited. – ST. JAMES THEATRE TO-NIGHT (Monday)” (p. 6).

John O’Connor (1830-1889) was extremely popular as both a scenic artist and easel artist, well-known for his landscapes and architectural paintings (cathedrals, churches, old buildings and street scenes). His artworks were exhibited across the country, and he was associated with the Society of British Artists, the Royal Academy, Royal Watercolour Society, the Royal Hibernian Society, and many other organizations. Much has been written about his theatrical contributions. However, for the purpose of this story – O’Connor was principal scenic artist at Theatre Royal, Haymarket, from 1863-1878, having succeeded William Callcott. Upon his passing, The Era reported, “We think we are correct in stating that the drop-curtain still used here [Haymarket Theatre] was the work of O’Connor and a pupil of his, Mr. Daniel White, who painted the four figures dancing a minuet” (p. 9). O’Connor’s obituary also remembered his “correctness of drawing, manipulative skill, and keen sense of the picturesque in the strongest light.”

It was O’Connor who even submitted a sketch of the Haymarket paint room that was published in The Graphic on Dec. 27, 1873.

In 1871, Daniel T. White was listed in the Census as an artist, living with his older brother in Kingston, Surrey. The White household included George F. White (35 yrs., surgeon), Caroline (30 yrs.), Daniel T. White (28 yrs., artist), Mary Ann Steven (28 yrs., servant) and James Peters (17 yrs., groom).

1871 was the same year that D. T. White, E. F. Clarke, and W. J. Hennessy were credited with illustrations for a publication entitled, “The Dark Blue.”

I was also astounded to learn that in 1877 Daniel Thomas White was hired by Henry Labouchère to provide artwork for the new publication “Truth.”  The was remembered in an article entitled 50 Years of “Truth” that was published in The Evening Dispatch on January 5, 1927 (page 3). The article reported, “The jubilee number of “Truth,” which first saw the light on 4 January, 1877, appears to-day. It was founded by Henry Labouchere when he was 45 years of age, and its number bore on the front page which it still bears. The artist, Daniel Thomas White, was an unknown man who drew the design “on spec,” and sent it to Labouchere who, it is believed, paid £10 for it…for the first few years Labouchere edited the paper, and turned out columns of paragraphs, lengthy articles of several pages on theatrical affairs and a “city” article of several pages…”

Here is the link to the first volume, numbers 1-26, with D. T. White’s illustration: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951002799229p&seq=17

In 1880, D. T. White was also listed as one of several men associated with the Junior Arts Club. On May 12, 1880 The Express reported, “The Junior Arts Club is the title of a new club at Lancaster House, Savoy, W. C. It is intended to be entirely a social club to facilitate intercourse between members of the literary, dramatic, artistic, and musical profession. It is anticipated that the rooms will be ready for occupation by Ladyday, when an inaugural dinner will be held. The following gentlemen constitute the honorary committee: – Sir Julius Benedict, J. Billington, H. J. Byron, Dutton Cook, W. W. Fenn, Luke Fildes, A.R.A.; W. P. Frith, R.A.; E. W. Godwin, F.S.A.; Major A. Griffiths, John Hollingshead, Henry Irving, Blanchard Jerrold, J. E. Millais, R.A.; J. C. Parkinson, C. Santley, Clement Scott, Major Hawley Smart, E. Solomon, Ashby Sterry, Charles Warner, D. T. White, W. G. Wills, and Edmund Yates” (p. 3).

By 1881, Daniel was living with another White brother in Christchurch Parish, St. Marylebone. Edmund White was now running the family business. The census listed the White household as including Edmund White (Chemist), Jane White (wife), George P. White (6, son), Edward D. White (3, son), Marshall Langtry (asst. Chemist), Josephus Mundaye (Chemist), Daniel T. White (brother, artist), Cecilia Purday (cook), and Elizabeth Bradford (servant).

In 1885, he married Maria Ann Curling (b.1861) in St. Giles Parish, London. Tragically, his young wife died that same year, and he did not remarry until 1897.

On Dec. 24, 1887, The Era Published an article entitled “The Drama at the Art Institute and the British Artists” (p. 9). D. T. White was listed as one of the contributors to the winter exhibition of the Institute of Painters in Oil Colours in Piccadilly. Of White’s artwork, the article reported, “Mr. D. T. White, who shows us, 509, “Garrick Introducing the Actresses to Dr. Johnson at his Theatre.” The actresses might have been portraits of Kitty Olive and Mrs. Abington, but are not. The Garrick is represented by Mr. White as almost of as many inches as Johnson, a height which makes Foote’s well-known jest about marionettes being “not so large as life – but only a little bigger than Mr. Garrick,” quite meaningless. The result of this introduction we know from Boswell was many a pleasant visit behind the scenes of Old Drury – visits which the susceptible old man, abruptly brought to an end, as he told Garrick himself, because the voluptuous charms of his actresses disturbed his meditations. Happily for the peace of mind our modern men of letters, they are not allowed to profane the mysteries of the Green-room!”

The 1891 Census listed Daniel as part of his mother’s household at No. 22 Orchard Road, Kingston, Surrey. Now a widower, Daniel listed his occupation as artist painter/sculptor. His older sister Caroline, now 51 yrs. old, was also living with their mother. This was just after he painted the act drop for Adelina Patti’s Theatre at Craig Y Nos Castle in Wales.

Amazingly, in 1895, White’s design for Patti’s Theatre act drop was pictured in The Magazine of Art!!!

In an article entitled “Art in the Theatre: Act-Drops,” White’s work was featured alongside that of William Telbin, Henry Emden, John O’Connor, F.  Harker, and Hawes Craven. I had accidentally stumbled across this article while doing one last search for “D. T. White.” 

What is remarkable about the image in the article is that it shows the actual design – not the completed act drop. We are able to see how certain elements were altered during the actual painting, including the addition of soprano roles to the border (see image below).

Interestingly, White’s design was criticized by William Telbin, author of the article. He wrote: “I also think that too much action is to be avoided on an act-drop. In the illustration on page 339, “Semiramide Driving the Chariot,” – though I have only seen the sketch herewith reproduced. The drop hangs in Madame Patti’s private theatre at Craig-y-Nos. Galloping horses must, of course, represent violent action, therefor the choice of subject I think not wise; calm water, placid skies, and the graceful rhythmic movement of the minuet – rather than stormy seas, wild and driving clouds, or dizzy whirling waltz – and thus the movement and colour in the School for Scandal scene exactly right.”

Wow….tell that to the dozens of theatre managers who selected Ben Hur’s Chariot Race as the subject for drop curtains…

Telbin’s article also included an image of the Haymarket Theatre Act drop, credited by D. T. White and John O’Connor.

Of this act drop Telbin wrote, “A decorative subject agreeable in coulour, graceful in design, will not offend in one case and may add tone in the other; I distinctly feel that representations of scenes from particular plays are inadvisable. In support of this opinion, two illustrations form subjects are given. The first is a reproduction of Mr. D. T. White’s and John O’Connor’s picture from the School for Scandal as represented by Mr. and Mrs. Bancroft at the Prince of Wale’s Theatre; and the other, Charles the First and Henrietta Maria in the grounds of Hampton Court Palace, by Mr. Hawes Craven, for the Lyceum. They are both charmingly painted, and most agreeable subjects, but are too distinctly individual to be quite appropriate in their agreeable public position.”

I have to wonder if Telbin was trying to pick a fight at this point. There is nothing like criticizing the work of your colleagues in a very public manner – and in an ART magazine.

A few years after Telbin’s article, Daniel White married again. At the age of 54 yrs. old, he wed 42-yrs.-old Kate Elizabeth Beyant Turner in Wandsworth, England. This was a second marriage for Kate too. Her first husband had been a banker, Charles Turner (1807-1891), 44 yrs. her senior. The childless couple lived in a house full of servants near the end, their marriage lasting from 1883 until Charles’ passing in 1891.

The 1901 Census listed Daniel and Kate White as living in Putney, London; White’s occupation as “artist oils/sculptor.” Daniel T. White passed away only seven years later, just shy of his 65^th birthday, in 1908. He is buried at Putney Vale Cemetery, in Wandsworth. Kate White outlived her husband by many years, living until 1936. I have located precious little information about her life as a widow.

It was almost 90 years before Daniel T. White made the news again. One of his paintings was pictured in The Independent On April 29, 1990. Titled “Battledoor and Shuttlecock,” it was part of the exhibit London’s Pride: the History of the Capital’s Gardens’ at the Museum of London, that ran from May 1-August 12, 1990.

All that remains of White’s legacy is a handful of oil paintings, some newspaper articles, and the Adelina Patti Theatre act-drop. Despite severe deterioration, the act-drop is the only extant example of White’s scenic art. It celebrates his brilliance as a scene painter who studied with John O’Connor. This drop desperately needs to be stabilized to prevent irreparable damage. It is a national treasure, a culturally significant artifact in the history of world theatre that not only documents the scenic artistry of Daniel T. White, but also the theatrical vision of Adelina Patti.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

“Mr. W. Hann” was credited with the painting of stock scenery for the Adelina Patti Theatre at Craig Y Nos Castle, Wales, in 1891. This was Walter Hann, a well-known, well-respected, and extremely talented artist, having worked in the scene painting trade for thirty-five years.

It was a familiar name to me; one that I have repeatedly encountered over the years, yet a career that I not really tracked down. Hann was an incredibly prolific artist, widely credited with many productions in both London and New York. Hann Some are listed in Robin Thurlow Lacy’s A Biographical Dictionary of Scenographers and Bobbi Owens’ The Broadway Design Roster. He is one of those 19^th-century scenic artists who should have a database dedicated to his productions;  there are just SO many. 

Amazingly, an article about Walter Hann was published in Friends of West Norwood Cemetery  in Sept 1998. It even included a portrait of Hann; one that I have yet to locate online.

Walter Hann was born on Jan. 11, 1838, in London. The youngest child of Robert Hann (1782-1874) and Mary Ann Carey (b. 1795). Walter was one of many children fathered by Robert Hann, with some historians suggesting as many as nineteen. This gets a little confusing as Robert Hann was married twice, and both his wives were named Mary:  Mary Hillier (m. in Sparkford, Somerset, England from 1802-1812) and Mary Carey (m. at St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster, London, from 1818-1874). Incidentally, I tracked down only one child from his first marriage to Mary Hillier – Robert Hann, born in 1808.

By the time Walter was born, his parents (Robert Hann and Mary Ann Carey) had been wed for over twenty years, and there were at least two more born after him.

Here are the children from Robert Hann’s second marriage:

Jane (b. 1819-?), Richard (1821-22), William (1822-23), Ann (b. 1824-25), Louisa (1825-26), Eliza (b. 1827-28), William Henry (b. 1827-28), Henry (b. 1831-1920), William (1832-1920), Caroline (1834-1917), Ellen (1835-?), Walter (1838-1922), Emily (b. 1841-?), Robert Jr. (1847-?), In looking at the birth and death dates, the first child to not die withing the first year of life was Henry in 1831; I cannot imagine this type of consistent loss from 1819 to 1831.

Walter’s father was consistently employed as a baker throughout his life.

Hann is part of a scenic art legacy. He was apprenticed to William John Callcott (1823-1900) at the Surrey Theatre in 1853. 1851 Census listed William J. Callcott as an “artist in oil and water colour,” living with his much younger brother Albert Callcott, who also worked as scenic artist at the Surrey Theatre. The two continued to live (and work) together for the next decade, even after William married Elizabeth Irons in 1855.

Hann picked a truly good apprentice, as Callcott’s work continued to be heralded, even after his passing in 1900. Examples of Calcott’s work were still included in the 1905 exhibition at Grafton Galleries in 1905, organized by the newly-formed Scenic Artists’ Association. On April 13, 1905, The Times reported, “The Scenic Artists’ Association, which was founded last year, is holding at the Grafton Galleries a week’s exhibition of drawings, paintings, models of scenes and other things, most of them the work of the members, some of them sent by members and friends. Scattered among the works of the living artists – for no one who has visited the exhibition will hesitate to grant the living exhibitor’s right to the term – are a few well-known old masters, examples of David Cox, Sam Bough, the Leitches, Nasmyth, Clarkston Stanfield, and W. J. Callcott…”

Calcott was not only well-known for his scenic art, but also easel art; his large-scale marine scenes were especially popular.  

Over the years, Hann also studied with William Roxby Beverly, Charles Marshall, and John Coleman. In turn, Hann’s own assistants included Joseph Harker, Bruce Smith (noted as his only apprentice), and his own son Ernest Hann (1879-1966). Ernest would follow in his father’s footsteps and continuously work as a scenic artist throughout the duration of his career.

This scenic art lineage, identifies Walter Hann as a key link in the development of English scenic art. He is especially significant when examining the throughline from one generation of English artists to the next.  Skills he learned at the paint benches of Callcott, Beverly, Marshall and Coleman were passed along to Harker, Smith, and his own son Ernest Hann. From there, you can continue to trace the scenic art legacy in theatre at home and abroad.

Scenic art remnants of Hann’s contribution to the Adelina Patti Theatre in 1891 are of both historical and cultural importance. Furthermore, the Victoria & Albert Museum holds dozens of Hann designs, dating from 1868-1904. Here is an example of Hann’s design work in the V&A Museum digital database:

Here is the link for the 1885 design for Junius:https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O695380/print-hann\

Hann’s career follows a series of twists and turns that links him to dozens of theaters throughout the UK. By 1856, Hann was engaged at Her Majesty’s Royal Italian Opera, and then the Adelphi Theatre in Sheffield. It was at the Adelphi that Hann was credited with the design and painting for Ambition in 1857. By now, Hann’s career was beginning to take shape.

The 1861 Census listed 23-yrs.-old Hann working as a scenic artist and living with his parents. The Hann household at that time included Robert Hann (79, retired baker), Mary A. Hann (65), Caroline Hann (27), Walter (23, scenic artist) and two boarders.

At the age of 25 yrs. old, Walter Hann married his first wife, Harriet Frances Dawes, The couple was wed on 9 March 1863 at St. Mary’s Lambeth, Surrey, England. That same year, Hann began painting with F. Lloyds at the St. James Theatre.

From 1865-1868 Hann worked at the Princess’s Theatre. This was at the same time, his family began to rapidly expand, celebrating the birth of their first three children: Harriet (b. 1864, St. Pancras) Walter Jr. (b. 1867, St. Pancras), Arthur (b. 1868).

Hann was making a name for himself, securing business form repeat customers. In 1868 and 1870, Hann delivered two act drops to the old Lyceum Theatre, painting at the venue throughout the early 1870s. From 1871-1874, Hann’s work was featured at the Princess Theatre (Manchester), The Prince of Wales Theatre (Birmingham), the Court Theatre, and Covent Garden.

By 1874, the Hann family lived at 51, Arthur Rd. Brixton. It was at this time that Hann’s professional and personal life began to thrive. Walter and Harriet Hann celebrated the birth of two more children in the 1870s: Constance (b. 1876, B. Brixton) and Ernest (b. 1879). He continued to work at the Lyceum, as well as Her Majesty’s in London.

As his family continued to expand, Hann also began painting scenery for William S. Gilbert’s plays. His contributions are detailed in Backdrop to a Legend: The Scenic Design of the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company (Raymond Walker and David Skelly, 2018. By the end of the 1870s, Hann was also working for Henry Irving on his productions at the Lyceum Theatre. Hann was painting alongside Hawes Craven, T.W. Hall, J.S. Hall, and W. Cuthbert.

The increased demand for Hann’s scenic art, prompted him to move his family from Brixton to Lambeth. The 1881 Census listed the Hann family’s address as 24 Guildford Rd, Lambeth, London. The household now included Walter (43), Harriet (41), Harriet (19), Walter Jr. (14), Arthur (12), Constance (4), Ernest (2) and a servant. During thr early 1880s, Hann began to paint on several productions for Wilson Barrett, including Romeo and Juliet (1881, Court Theatre) and Hamlet (1884, Princess’s Theatre).

Here is the link for the 1884 design for Hamlet: https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O695386/theatre-design-hann/

In 1880 Hann established his own studio on Murphy Street where he would enjoy great success painting for well-known theatrical personalities that included Wilson Barrett, Henry Irving, Dion Boucicault, Herbert Beerbohm Tree, Bancroft, H. A. Jones, and many others. Hann was entering the peak of his career by the late 1880s. It is in the midst of success, that tragedy often strikes. In 1887, his wife passed away, followed by his son Arthur the next year.

In 1890, Hann was primarily painting on productions for John Lancaster at the Shaftesbury Theatre and Wilson Barrett at the New Olympic Theatre. The year that Hann painted scenery for Adelina Patti, he was doing extremely well, with his name constantly making news. It is not surprising that Patti hired him to paint stock scenery for her theatre.  

In 1891, Hann frequently made news, credited with an abundance of scenery. That year, he was associated with the following Shaftesbury Theatre productions: The Middleman  (painted with J. A. O’Rorke), Handfast  (painted with Mr. H. Potts), and Judah. Hann’s work for Wilson Barrett at the Olympis Theatre included Ben-My-Chree and The Acrobat (painted with Stafford Hall). Hann also worked with T. F. Dunn and Joseph Harker on scenery for The Idler, performed at Theatre Royal, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne that September, The following month, Hann was credited with scenery for The Crusader, Henry Arthur Jones’ new play of Modern London Life.

The year after Hann delivered Adelina Patti’s stock scenery he married. On July 6, 1892, Emily “Totty” Mary Matthews (1857-1944) became his wife.  The two celebrated the birth of only one child, in 1896 – Maurice Hann.  

In addition to his scenic art, Hann’s easel art was also well-received and quite popular He exhibited at numerous galleries throughout his career, including the Suffolk Street Gallery, Royal Hiberian Gallery, and the Royal Academy. I am going to stop here, as this gives a pretty good snapshot of why Patti selected Hann to paint her stock scenery collection. In 1891, his scenic art skill and theatrical connections were paramount.

There is a wonderful article about Hann published in The Era on May 25, 1912 (Thank you for sharing, Mike Hume!). An interview with Hann was included in a section entitled, “Scenery, Scenic Art, and Its Artists.” Here is the full transcription, with portrait of Hann:

Interview with Walter Hann.

A Londoner by birth, born as far back as 1838, son of Robert Hann. He has two daughters, three sons, and one son working with him in his business, and, generally speaking, he has been constantly at work now for 56 years. “That’s what I call a pretty long time, Mr. Hann. I suppose you have painted every subject in the world, every country in the world, and every style of architecture in the world in your vast experiences?”

Mr. Hann acknowledged that it fell to the lot of a scenic artist to be very versatile and be able to grasp any subject at a very short notice, and nothing escaped him. More so than the academician, I suggested. Mr. Hann said that he had exhibited himself in the Royal Academy some half a dozen times, and one of the pictures painted in distemper on brown paper was sold to Mr. George R. Sims, who, I believe, would not part with it, “He has asked me for a companion, but I regret to say I have neglected to do so.” Then the late Wilson Barrett was made a present of another picture, which was recorded in “The Era.” But here are a few celebrated people he has worked for: John Colman, Frederick Lloyd, George Vining, Marie Litton, Sir Henry Irving, the Bancrofts, Wilson Barrett, Hare, and Kendal, Sir George Alexander, Forbes-Robertson, Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree, Augustin Daly, George Edwards, Frank Curzon, Charles Calvert, Dion Boucicault, Tom B. Davis, Charles Frohman, Frederick Harrison, Cyril Maude, Arthur Chudleigh, Weedon Grossmith, William Grœt, Charles Hawtey, Henry Arthur Jones, Otto Stuart, and practically every important manager in the country.

And here are a few productions that he has either done entirely or been connected with: – Royal Italian Opera, the original; “Arrah-na-Pogue,” “Streets of London,” “Dark Days,” “The Huguenots,” “Babil and Bijou”, “Rienzi,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Still Waters Run Deep,” “Mice and Men,” “Othello,” “The Light That Failed,” “Twin Sister,” “Letty,” “Claudian,” “Junius,” “Hamlet,” “Lights of London,” “Romany Rye,” and the following now running: – “Mind the Paint Girl,” “Looking for Trouble,” “At the Barn,” and others.

He started as a scenic artist at the old Her Majesty’s Theatre, and has been scenic artist at the old Adelphi in Sheffield, St. Jame’s, Olympic, Princess’s, Court Theatre, Covent Garden, and nearly every noted theatre in London. It was at Sheffield that he was responsible for the production of “Ambition,” it being his first complete production.

“I suppose you have had a great number of apprentices in your time, Mr. Hann?”

No, I haven’t. I only had one who became a scene painter, and that was Bruce Smith, who is one of the most genial men in the profession. He was painting with me three years, and he has been doing it ever since, and I rejoice in his success.”

“Can you give me a list of some of your principal assistants, who have worked with you?”

“Well, Jos. Harker, worked with me for some time, also Tom Hall, H. P. Hall, Theodore Parry, and a whole host of assistants who have not yet come to the front, but show great promise.”

“What is your favorite amusement?”

“Painting, and if I have any spare time I seek nature.”

“Have you done any important work, Mr. Hann, beside theatrical work and pictures?”

“Yes,” he replied, “a few things, the most important being for the Brussels Exhibition in 1910. I painted some tableaux illustrating the woolen industry for the Chamber of Commerce, firstly, a series of tableaux showing the process through which the wool has to go before being ready for use. They were in the following order: The sheep grazing on the hillside, wool sorting, combing, spinning, dyeing, and weaving, with lifesized wax figures of the mill hands busy at the machines. All the machinery was correct in very detail, being painted under the supervision of two of the engineers sent specially from Bradford for the purpose, culminating a fell-sized tableaux of the interior of the lobby of the House of Commons, with twenty-five lifesized wax figures of prominent M. P.’s of the day, all their clothing being made of woolen materials from the Bradford mills. Other tableaux, showing completed materials in the form of clothing.

“Some of these tableaux were destroyed in that terrible fire at the Brussels Exhibition, so I repainted them for the exhibition at Turin the following year.”

“And what is that, Mr. Hann?” said I, pointing to a certificate hanging on the wall.

“Oh, that,” he replied, “is a gold medal diploma awarded to me for the work I was just speaking of which I did for the Brussels Exhibition.”

“That is an honour, Mr. Hann.”

“Yes, he replied, “and one I greatly appreciate; but I must own, I don’t live for the honour; I love for my work.”

“Well, I see you are busy, painting a gymnasium and a lovely woodland for the Duke of York’s, so I think I will leave you to do some more of your work of love, and get on with mine. Good wishes, good luck, and best of health ofr years to come.

T. B. S.

As with many great scenic artists, little of their scenic work remains. That is what makes the scenic remnants at the Adelina Patti theatre so remarkable. Despite changes in ownership and building renovations, they have somehow managed to survive.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

On August 7, 2024, Mike Hume and I visited the Adelina Patti Theatre in the Craig Y Nos Castle, Wales. My last post focused on this well-known soprano and the construction of her theatre. This blog is going to look at remnants of her stock scenery collection. A few borders and a garden drop are all that remain. Visitors can only catch glimpses of delicate branches and lacy foliage high above their heads. Here is a view from the fly rail of the theatre that shows some of the original painting by scenic artist Walter Hann. He will be the subject of my next post.

I am going to start with an article published in Western Mail article about the opening of Adelina Patti’s Theatre in 1891, detailing some technical aspects. The article was discovered by Mike Hume, who has included it on his page about the theatre at Historic Theatre Photography.

The inaugural address for the opening of Adelina Patti’s Theatre was published in a Western Mail article. Mr. Terriss, a last-minute replacement for Henry Irving, gave the address. Here is an excerpt:

 “Ladies and Gentlemen, – I stand here as the humble and inadequate representative of the first of living English actors. It had been the intention of Mr. Henry Irving to signalize his appreciation of Madame Adelina Patti’s transcendent talent as a singer and actress, and to mark his strong sense of the close alliance connecting the musical and dramatic arts, by speaking a few inaugural words on this occasion – one that is unique in operatic and theatrical annals alike. For we are met here to be present at an initial performance held in a theatre which, at the generous behest of the Queen of Song, has been erected and provided with every mechanical appliance perfected by modern science in the very heart of a wild Welsh valley, teeming with the beauties of Nature and remote from the busy haunts of men.”

No expense was spared in the outfitting of Patti’s Theatre. The stage, machinery and lighting were also detailed in the article:

The stage is 24 ft. deep and 40 ft. wide, with ample height to allow the whole of the scenes to be raised into the flies without rolling. Every modern appliance necessary for opera and pantomime has been provided. There are electric footlights, rows of batten lights in the wings, and ground lights with coloured lamps for giving coloured effects. The number of lights in the entire theatre is 281, and all these are under the control of the prompter by means of a handsome switchboard which has each department labelled. A cellar under stage accommodates the machinery for working the scenes and traps: whilst alongside the auditorium on the opposite side of the corridor is a large scene dock, 32 ft. long and full height, to accommodate scenes when not in use. Behind the stage are five dressing-rooms on the first and second floors, with a loft over the properties. The architects were Messrs. Bucknall and Jennings, of Swansea and London. The builder was Mr. H. Smith, of Kidderminster; the scenery was painted by Mr. W. Hann, of London; and the decorations done by Messrs. Jackson and Sons, of London. The electric lighting has been carried out by the Wenham Light Company.

The Western Mail newspaper article provided the name of the scenic artist responsible for the stock scenery collection – Mr. W. Hann [Walter Hann]. A few of his settings were described in opening night festivities. For example, in the performance of Act I from La Traviata’s (Patti played her favorite character – Violetta Valery), the article reported, “Then the curtain rose, disclosing a very tasteful drawing room set scene leading out into a conservatory.” An illustration of this scene was published in Black & White magazine on August 22, 1891.  It gives us a true sense of how the stage looked on opening night. The newspaper illustration is now in the People’s Collection of Wales.

I also want to draw your attention to proscenium drapery – and how very little of the proscenium opening is covered in this illustration.

Such is not the case with the current proscenium draperies.

The drapery, however, was mentioned in the newspaper article when Mr. Terriss completed his inaugural address: “The great actor retired behind the heavy folding curtain of electric blue plush, which almost immediately afterwards parted and disclosed the beautiful act drop with Mdme. Patti as Semiramide driving the chariot.”

Other stock scenery by Walter Hann for the Adelina Patti Theatre included a garden backdrop, cottage wing and wood wing. I believe that the garden drop is still suspended in the theatre, although greatly altered over time with overpainting. It was used for first act of Faust, also performed on opening night.  The Western Mail article reported:

“When the curtain rose on the first scene in “Faust,” great admiration was evinced. It was a delightful rustic scene, representing an enclosed garden, Margherita’s cottage on one hand, a group of trees and flowers in the center, and on the other side a rustic seat and Margherita’s spinning wheel.” The “group of trees and flowers in the center” would have been a painted flat the rose up through a cut in the stage floor.

A photograph of Walter Hann’s garden setting was included in the Adelina Patti Documentary, produced by the Bannau Brycheiniog (Brecon Beacons) National Park.

I took a screen shot while watching the documentary and enlarged the image to compare it with the current garden drop hung from the back of the stage.

Unfortunately, the lower half of the garden drop has been heavily repainted; note the extremely bright greens and blues.

I was unable to photograph the entire composition, but the detail above shows the same pathways, garden wall and steps in the photograph above. The over painting is in sharp contrast to the original branches and leaves on the woodland borders (see below).

The branches and foliage work on the borders remains in sharp contrast to the more recent additions to the garden drop (see below).

There are a few things to point out about the overpainting historic stage settings and the addition of painted elements. It is relatively easy to spot additions when simply analyzing color. The brightest greens, yellows, and blues look like they came out of a can. These colors fail to include the complimentary color, thus supporting painted illusion for the stage. This is one of the topics that I had presented on the week before when teaching the Historic Scene Painting Workshop and delivering the paper, “Scenic Art: Past and Present”, at the Tyne Opera House and Theatre (July 30-August 2, 2024).

Only the garden steps in the composition below are original, whereas many of the organic elements (crude floral and foliage arrangements) have been heavily over painted. Specifically, the blue foxglove in the foreground, the shrubbery and vines against the garden wall, the pink flowers, and bright green grass do not contribute to the scenic illusion. They read as “flat” and without definition or dimension.

The overpainting primarily occurred in areas that were easy to reach from the stage floor. That is likely why the corresponding woodland borders remain untouched.

Here are a few more photographs of the garden backdrop, detailing the addition of foliage and flowers.

The repainting of an original scene is not uncommon. When a drop, wing, or other piece of scenery began to show wear, there were frequent attempts to “brighten up” a composition. When Walter Hann’s garden scene was “touched up”, additional elements were added throughout the composition, such as the pink flowers on top of the original spheres transforming each in to a floral vase (see image above). This same color was also added to bushes against the garden wall.

Photographs and illustrations of the Adelina Patty Theatre are extremely rare. Amazingly, I tracked one down from 1893 that depicted a cityscape, cottage wings, and foliage. The bush in the center would have emerged through the cut, attached to a sloat.

Here is the entire page published in L’illustrazione Italiana. I was astounded to discover that all of the issues have been digitized and area available though Internet Archive. Here is the January 15 issue (anno XX. No. 3)

This setting, and almost all of the other stock scenery once used for productions at the Adelina Patty theatre are missing.

The Theatre Trust includes a page on the Adelina Patti Theatre that shows an image of wood wings (see image below).

It is possible that they are in another area of the building, or I missed them, or they are the current wings (now painted black) on stage.

I would love to see the rest of the Theatre Trust images. They would help identify the rest of the stock scenery.

Here is one more that I found online (c. 2010) looks like there were flats on stage.

The photograph above was used in a BBC Wales Arts article: Five Welsh Theatres placed on at-risk register.

Only tattered remnants survive, but that does not diminish the significance of the stage nor the remaining artifacts.

My next post will examine the life and career of Walter Hann, scenic artist who painted the stock scenery for Adelina Patti’s Theatre.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

Mike Hume and I drove to Craig Y Nos Castle on the morning of August 7, 2024. We had scheduled an appointment to visit the Adelina Patti Theatre.

Fortunately, there was enough time that morning to explore the small town of Brecon. Despite cloudy skies and damp streets, everything was verdant green from a recent rain storm.

Blue skies began to appear on our drive to Craig Y Nos Castle, playing a game of peek-a-boo with the clouds. This made the sections of the landscape sparkle as rays of sunshine chased across the hills. I now have ample source material for my painting projects this winter!

We soon arrived at our destination – Craig Y Nos Castle, now home to both weddings and ghost tours. Located near Glyntawe in Powys, Wales, the estate is nestled in the scenic Brecon Beacons.

It is very easy to see and feel what draws people to this place. The countryside is picturesque and the old building rife with history. Adelina Patti’s Castle and Theatre should be on the bucket list of every opera-enthusiast and theatre historian.

I am going to start with a little history about the castle before shifting to Adelina Patti and her theatre. This will be the first of at least three blog posts.

Captain Rice Davies Powell built a country house of limestone in 1840. Reminiscent of Gothic Castles and Baronial Halls, the building complex was situated on a terraced site above the River Tawe in the upper Swansea Valley. As in many grand construction projects, however, costs eventually exceeded available funds, leaving the north wing unfinished.

In 1878 Adelina Patti purchased the limestone mansion and immediately began an extensive renovation, both expanding the building and developing the grounds. She was at the height of her career as a Bel Canto Soprano, performing all over the world. Her new estate was not only an oasis between operatic tours, but also a testament to her talent and success. 

In 1891, Patti added a private theatre, complete with stage machinery and stock scenery. It is estimated that the hall could accommodate between 180-200 people.

The inaugural program lists Patti performing in scenes from La Traviata, Faust, Martha, and Romeo & Giulietta. Here is an illustration from opening night.

Few photographs of the theatre survive, making it difficult to identify specific scenes delivered to the stage. Here is the only one I have found to date that depicts a landscape drop, woodland board, and two wood wings.

On July 27, 1891, an article in Western Mail described: “The most unique thing about the establishment is the floor of the auditorium, which can be raised from a slant of one inch in twenty to an exact level with the floor. Madame Patti has in this way managed to combine in one building a perfect theatre and ball-room.”

This aspect was again described in another article, published in Western Mail on August 22, 1891. It reported, “The floor has been arranged with a view to utilizing the theatre as a ball-room when desirable. For this purpose the floor, which slants away towards the stage end, for the purpose of giving a good view, can be raised without any difficulty to a perfect level with he stage. A ballroom 62 ft. long can thus be provided at any moment, and the fact of cosy drawing room effects being obtainable at the stage end certainly does not diminish the pleasures of the ballroom.“

To many, the private theatre may appear to be a self-aggrandizing endeavor for an aging opera star; nothing more than a diva’s playhouse. Even newspapers at the time described Adelina’s excitement for the opening of the venue as a child with a new toy.

However, this perception minimizes both Patti’s accomplishments and the space. When reflecting on her life and career, I see a very smart and successful individual; one with the financial freedom to built a theatre and practice her art.

Her financial success was remembered upon her passing. On Monday, September 29, 1919, The Daily Telegraph reported, “Adelina Patti was certainly the only woman of her own or any other epoch which had earned three-quarters of a million sterling by singing and acting, in the course of three decades and a half. It was only, however, after her separation from the Marquis de Caux that she was able to mass considerable wealth, Probably her largest earnings were acquired during her American tours executed under the respective managements of Colonel James Mapleson and Henry Abbey. For many years before her definitive retirement into her private life her Albert Hall concerts and British provincial engagements were arranged by Mr. Percy Harrison, of Birmingham, her rates of remuneration being fixed at £800 for every London performance, and £500 per concert in the provinces.”

Patti’s purchase, renovation, and expansion of Craig Y Nos Castle is her lasting legacy. Craig Y Nos Castle and the Adelina Patti Theatre are something that has far outlasted her life and career.

There is another aspect of Patti’s tale that may resonate with women today. Older women are often set aside; life-long contributions minimized. In the end, their names are either forgotten or ignored. Such is the case of Adelina Patti. Before this trip, I had no idea who she was, what she accomplished, or anything about her theatrical legacy. Her tale has been left out of so many history books.

I am going to start with an 1895 article published in the Westminster Budget entitled, “Patti at Craig Y Nos: The Queen of Song at the Opera Once Again” (pages 13-14). It really speaks to her character, kindness, generosity, and success.

Here it Patti’s portrait that graced the cover of the publication.

“On Tuesday night Patti appeared in “Traviata” at the Italian Opera, and was of course enthusiastically welcomed by a great audience. Only for a short season will the most famous of singers tear herself away from that most sumptuous palace of hers in Wales, to which we give some pictures here, and a few notes of a visit paid to her some time ago by one of our contributors :-

During my visit to Craig-y-Nos we usually spent our evenings in the billiard rooms. There are two at the castle, an English room and a French one. In the French room there is the great orchestrion which Madame Patti had built in Geneva at a cost of £5,000. It is operated by electricity, and is said to be the finest instrument of the kind in the world. M. Nicolini would start it of an evening, and the wonderful contrivance would “discourse most eloquent music” from a repertoire of 116 pieces, including arias from grand operas, military marches, and simple ballads. Music is the one charm that Madame Patti cannot resist. The simplest melody stirs her to song. In the far corner from the orchestra she will sit, in an enticing easy-chair, and hum the air that is rolling from the organ-pipes, keeping time with her dainty feet, or moving her head as the air grows livelier. Now and again she sends forth some lark-like troll, and then she will urge the young people to a dance or a chorus, and when everyone is tuned to the full pitch of melody and merriment she will join in the fun as heartily as the rest. I used to sit and watch her play the castanets or hear her snatch an air or two from ” Martha,” “Lucia,” or “Traviata.” One night the younger fry of us were chanting negro melodies, and Patti came into the room, warbling as if possessed by an ecstasy. “I love those darky songs” said she, and straightway she sang to us, with that inimitable purity and tenderness which are hers alone; “Way Down upon the Swanee River,” and “Massa’s in the Cold, Cold Ground,” and after that “Home, Sweet Home,” while all of us listeners felt the tears rising, or the lumps swelling in our throats.

Guests at Craig-y-Nos are the most fortunate of mortals. If the guest be a gentleman, a valet is told off to attend upon him; if the guest be a lady, a handmaid is placed at her service. Breakfast is served in one’s room at any hour one may choose. Patti never comes down before high noon. She rises at half-past eight, but remains until twelve in her apartments, going through her correspondence with her secretary, and practicing a little music. At half-past twelve an elaborate déjeuner is served in the glass pavilion. Until that hour, a guest is free to follow his own devices. He may go shooting, fishing, riding, walking, or he may stroll about the lovely demesne, and see what manner of heavenly nook nature and Patti have made for themselves among the hills of Wales. Patti’s castle is in every sense a palatial dwelling. She saw it fifteen years ago, fell in love with it, purchased it, and has subsequently expended at least £100,000 in enlarging and equipping it. The castellated mansion, with the theatre at one end, and the pavilion and winter garden at the other, shows a frontage of fully 1,000ft, along the terraced banks of the Tawe. But the place has been so often described that it is unnecessary for me to repeat the oft-told story, or to give details of the gasworks, the electric-lighting station, the ice-plant and cold-storage rooms, the steam-laundry, the French and English kitchens, the stables, the carriage-houses, the fifty servants, the watchfulness of Caroline Baumeister, the superintending zeal of William Heck.

Every afternoon about three o’clock Patti and her guests go for a drive, a small procession of landaus and brakes rattling along the smooth country roads. You can see at once that this is Patti land. The cottagers come to their doors and salute her Melodious Majesty, and all the children of the countryside run out and throw kisses. “Oh! the dears,” exclaimed the kind-hearted cantatrice as we were driving towards the village of Ystradgynlais (they call it “Ist-rag-dun-las”) one afternoon, “I should like to build another castle and put all those mites into it, and let them live there amid music and flowers!” And I believe that she would have given orders for such a castle straightway had there been a builder within sight.

On the way home Patti promised me “a surprise for the evening.” She appeared later on covered with jewels, and when the non-appearance of the ladies kept the gentlemen waiting in the drawing-room at dinner-time I was the more puzzled. Nicolini, to pass the time, showed us some of Madame’s trophies. It would be impossible to enumerate them, because Craig-y-Nos Castle is like another South Kensington Museum in the treasures it holds. Every shelf, table, and cabinet is packed with gifts which Madame Patti has received from all parts of the earth, from monarchs and millionaires, princes and peasants, old friends and strangers. There is Marie Antoinette’s watch to begin with, and there are the portraits of the Prince and Princess of Wales to end with. There is a remarkable collection of portraits of Royal personages, presented to Madame Patti by the distinguished originals on the occasion of her marriage to M. Nicolini. Photographs of the Grand Old Man of Politics and the Grand Old Man of Music rest side by side, on a little table presented by some potentate. Gladstone’s likeness bears his autograph, and the inscription: “Con tanti e tanti complimenti”; Verdi’s, his autograph, and a fervid tribute written in Milan a year ago. There are crowns and wreaths and rare China, there are paintings and I know not what, wherever one looks. If one were to make Patti a gift, and he had a king’s ransom to purchase it withal, he would find it difficult to give her anything that would be a novelty, or that would be unique in her eyes. She has everything now. For my part, I would pluck a rose from her garden, or gather a nosegay from a hedgerow, and it would please her as truly as if it were a priceless diadem. She values the thought that prompts the giving rather than the gift itself. She never forgets even the smallest act of kindness that is done for her sake. And she is always doing kindnesses for others. I have heard from the Welsh folk many tales of her generous charities. And to her friends she is the most open-handed of women. There was one dank, drizzly day while I was at Craig-y-Nos. To the men this did not matter. The wet did not interfere with their projected amusements. But every lady wore some precious jewel which Patti had given her that morning – a ring, a brooch, a bracelet, as the case might be. For the generous creature thought her fair friends would be disappointed because they could not get out of doors that day. How could she know that everyone in the castle welcomed the rain because it meant a few hours more with Patti?

Another article published in Western Mail on June 27, 1891, stated, “Here all are welcome. It is a fortress of hospitality. No visitor ever waits at the door. Madame Patti is particularly kind to literary men and journalists. She is never too busy to see them and show them what the hospitality of a Welsh castle is. Suspicion is banished from this enchanted spot, and no visitor is every plied with questions. That is left to vulgar city dwellers. The only title you need to a warm reception at Craig-y-Nos is that you have thought enough of Madame Patti to make the long and fatiguing journey.”

Much has been written about Patti, over the past 150 years. There is a wonderful Adelina Patti Documentary, produced by the Bannau Brycheiniog (Brecon Beacons) National Park, with Welsh translation too! However, I want to provide just a little context for the purposes of this blog. Here is a very brief summary of of this remarkable woman before I share some photographs of her theatre.

Adela Juana Maria Patti was born in Madrid Spain on Feb. 19, 1843. She was the daughter of Italian tenor Salvatore Patti and soprano Caterina Barilli. The Patti family moved to New York City when Adelina was still an infant. She grew up in Bronx neighborhood, one of many skilled musicians!

In 1877 Adelina reminisced about her early childhood:

A musical ear, as well as an aptitude for and great love of singing, was in developed in me at an extremely early age. Even as a little child, I was madly fond of music and the stage. I went to the opera every evening my mother appeared, every melody, every action, was impressed indelibly on my mind.”

It should be no surprise that her first public performance was by the age of 7 yrs. old. Before she turned 16, Patti played the title role of Lucia di Lammermoor at New York’s Academy of Music. Audiences were captivated by her voice; described as pure and bird-like, with an astounding flexibility. At 18 yrs old, she performed the role of Amina in La sonnambula at Covent Garden in London. Her immediate success in London quickly fueled an international career, resulting in tours throughout Europe, Russia and North America.  

Over the course of her life, Patti married three times: Henri de Roger de Cahusac (1868-1885), Ernesto Nicolini (1886-1898) and Rolf Cederström (1899-1919). Adelina Patti built her theatre in Wales while married to French tenor Nicolini (1834-1898). When Nicolini passed away in 1898, Patti was 56 yrs. old and heartbroken. Her final marriage was to Baron Cederström (http://history.powys.org.uk/history/ystrad/craig7.html , a Swedish nobleman 26 years her junior. Records suggest that her life dramatically changed at this time, with her third husband becoming restricting both personal, professional, and financial endeavors.

Understandably, Patti wanted to continue being seen, heard, and respected. Just five years before her passing, Patti planted an oak tree on her estate in 1914. It commemorated her last performance at Royal Albert Hall to aid victims of World War I. Unlike a statue, the tree was a tangible representation of this event; one that would continue to positively impact the earth after her passing.

In my opinion, the Adelina Patti theatre is the epitome of what women can accomplish when they are free from societal and financial binds.  The space is inspirational, especially when considering it was built by a woman during an era when the majority of them had little control over their finances, let alone their bodies or future.

Here are some photographs from our visit to Adelina Patti Theatre at Craig Y Nos Castle.

For more detailed information about the history of Patti and her castle visit the Powys Digital History Project.

Adelina Patti passed away on September 27, 1919. Newspapers around the world mourned the loss, with many again sharing the story of this remarkable woman.

Tomorrow I will explore the lives of scenic artists credited with Adelina Patti Theatre scenery and stage machinery. For more photos and information about our visit to the theatre, visit Mike Hume’s Historic Theatre Photography.

To be continued…

Copyright © 2024 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

I am going to cover a lot of ground in this post. From the morning of August 5 to the evening of 6, 2024, we ran on a tight schedule as we traveled from Buxton, England, to Brecon, Wales. In the end we visited seven theaters in two days: Buxton Opera House, Chatsworth House Theatre, Sheffield’s Lyceum Theatre, Nottingham’s Theatre Royal & Royal Concert Hall, Nottingham Playhouse, and Cheltenham’s Everyman Theatre.

On our way from Skipton to Nottingham, we opted to take a chance at the Lyceum Theatre in Sheffield, without an invitation.  There are no other words for our impromptu visit to the Lyceum other than “lucky.”

Fortunately, Mike had already photographed the Lyceum, so this was our foot in the door. With the promise of “no photography” (due to a major touring production) we were soon ushered into the space for an amazing tour. Here are Mike Hume’s page on Sheffield’s Lyceum Theatre: https://www.historictheatrephotos.com/Theatre/Lyceum-Sheffield.aspx

On the morning of August 6, we headed into Nottingham for our first stop at the Theatre Royal. Our appointment was scheduled an hour before the crew was called, so we could see the safety curtain. Here are a few pictures of the space:

An unexpected bonus was heading next door to see the Royal Concert Hall. Amazingly, this was the one time of the year that they perform maintenance on the orchestra shell – phenomenal site!

Our next visit was to the paint shop at the Nottingham playhouse.

Clair Thompson, Emily Hackett, and Erin Heming had all attended my Distemper Painting Workshop at the Tyne Theatre & Opera House from July 30-August 1, 2024. I also want to make it clear that we had more than one invitation from both workshop participants and conference attendees; we just couldn’t fit everything into our schedule. This visit was only possible because it was only a short walk from the Theatre Royal & Royal Concert Hall.

Claire Thompson’s shop may be one of the friendliest spaces that I have entered in quite sometime.  Although, bustling with activity, there was a concerted effort to stop and welcome us with coffee/tea and biscuits (cookies). Those is charge frequently set the tone; Claire’s kindness radiates and is reflected by those around her. I will tell you one thing, if I ever move to Nottingham, I want to work with the women from this shop.

Despite our busy schedule, Mike and I made time to visit two tourist attractions (my request).  The first was Robin Hood’s statue at Nottingham Castle; it was the tale of Robin Hood that peaked my mom’s interest in history, a passion that she passed down to me.

Our second quick visit was to Old Ye Olde Trip to Jerusalem 1189 AD, purportedly the oldest inn in England.

After Nottingham, Mike and I drove to Cheltenham where we had an afternoon appointment at the Everyman Theatre. This tour truly exceeded all our expectations. We were all over the building! Here are a few photos from our visit.

When Mike Hume creates pages for the abovementioned at Historic Theatre Photography, I will share the links HERE.

After Cheltenham, we we were on our way to Wales.

By early evening we were enjoying dinner at the Hotel Wellington. My next few posts will be about the Adelina Patti Theatre in Craig Y Nos, Wales.

To be continued…