Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 383 – The Battle Between Two Scenic Art Traditions

Part 383: The Battle Between Two Scenic Art Traditions

I believe that a battle between two American schools of scenic art commenced in earnest during the 1870s – the English school of glazing and Central European school of solid color application. Each school held a fierce loyalty to their respective traditions and techniques.

An example of the glazing technique, characteristic of the English School. This approach to scenic art is detailed in yesterday’s post, part #382.
An example of the solid color technique, characteristic of the Central European School. This approach to scenic art is detailed in yesterday’s post, part #382.

The 1870s was the time when many scenic artists traveled west following the rapid expansion of the country – there was work to be had throughout the region. They moved to Chicago where opportunities abounded after the great fire in 1871 and the area became a major manufacturing center for theatrical scenery and stage machinery; destroyed theatres were rebuilt and new ones popped up everywhere. Scenic artists working in Chicago and the west gravitated toward a system of efficiency, even more so than before. This refined Central European approach in scenic art did not include multiple layers of glazing. The artists in the Midwest needed a refined system of paint application that allowed a quick turn around. They needed to produce hundreds of drops over an extremely short period of time; this was capitalism at its finest and the audience took no notice of the aesthetic shift that was occurring before their eyes.

Each approach, whether painting with glazes or solid colors, is valid. However, there is one a distinct difference – speed. Remember that I speak from the tradition of the Central European approach, so my perception is subjective. Glazing relies on a series of thinned paint application that take more time to dry than the simple layer of solid color. Painting a dark composition when starting with a light base can be extremely time consuming. Large areas may need to be glazed repeatedly, and this takes time. The final effect is stunning, airy and ethereal. However, it may be labor intensive, remaining on a paint frame too long, taking up valuable space in a studio with limited paint frames. When using solid colors in an opaque manner, you layout large areas of color and each additional layer takes up lest space as you are going from dark to light. For example, dark areas of color that form the basis of a treetop are quickly defined with a few brush strikes suggesting leaves.

At the end of the nineteenth century, J. W. Lawrence took a jab at the quick application of solid colors as practiced by the scenic studio artists. He further commented on the rapidity of scenic artists who did not employ the glazing techniques, writing, “the days of glazing and second painting are gone for ever. What matters is that the adoption of the broadest system of treatment possible – working slapdash fashion in a full body colors- makes the painting crude and garish? All the more merit: for the average provincial American gives his vote for gaudiness and plenty of it.”

Lawrence continued, “To meet the demands for the new stocks of scenery which are generally laid in when the little theatre is first erected, several scenic firms have sprung up in St. Louis, Chicago, Kansas and elsewhere, which employ artists of marked inferiority and turn out work which bears as much resemblance to the genuine article as a chromo does to an oil-painting.” I have to chuckle as I think what he is really saying is “if it doesn’t take a long time to paint, the backdrop has no merit.”

He was taking issue with the fact that several “scenic depots” had risen to prominence in the Midwestern region of the United States. One “depot” was the Sosman & Landis studio, Lawrence even mentioned this scene painting firm by name and reported that the company had provided stock scenery collections for one-thousand small opera houses over the brief span of nine years. Sosman & Landis, as other studios in Chicago, Kansas, and St. Louis employed the scenic art techniques associated with Central European tradition of painting with solid colors for a rich opacity.

He who painted the most scenery won; and the Midwestern artists were ahead of the game during the late nineteenth century as their approach to painting was faster. One way for the Eastern artists to attack their competitors was to diminish the mass-production of painted scenery in the Central European tradition as a “slapdash fashion in a full body colors of solid colors.” Yet this approach to scenic art was appearing in hundreds of opera houses across the country; it was establishing a standard in the American theatre market.

Glancing at Julius Cahn’s Official Theatrical Guide from 1896-1897 illustrates just how much of the market had been gained by Sosman & Landis. Their name dominated the list of any other competitor. They produced out a ridiculous amount of scenery in a relatively short period of time. To further explore their productivity, a newspaper article listed how many venues Sosman & Landis fitted up from June 1881 to July 1882.

New Opera House, Rockford, Illinois

Academy of Music, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Grand Opera House, Richmond, Indiana

Hill’s Opera House, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Humblin’s Opera House, Battle Creek, Michigan

Union Opera House, Kalamazoo, Michigan

Russell’s Opera House, Bonham, Texas

Brownsville Opera House, Brownsville, Texas

My Theatre, Fort Worth, Texas

Leach’s Opera House, Somerville, Tennessee

Kahn’s Opera House Boliver, Tennesse

King’s Opera House, Jackson, Tennessee

Stummer’s Hall, Washington, Georgia

Vicksburg Opera House, Vicksburg, Mississippi

McWhinney’s Opera House, Greenville, Ohio

Yengling Opera House, Minerva, Ohio

City Hall, Athens, Ohio

Freeman’s Opera Hall, Geneseo, Illinois

Odd Fellows Hall, Peshtigo, Wisconsin

Hyde’s Opera House, Lancaster, Wisconsin

Klaus’ Opera House, Green Bay, Wisconsin

Storie’s Opera House, Menominee, Wisconsin

Holt’s Opera House, Anamosa, Iowa

King’s Opera House, Hazleton, Iowa

Opera House Nanticoke, Pennsylvania

Opera House Athens, Georgia

Opera House Gainsville, Texas

Opera House Reidsville, North Carolina

Edsell Opera House, Otsego, Michigan

New Opera House, Howell, Michigan

Stouch Opera House, Garnett, Kansas

Germania Hall, Blair, Nebraska

Bennett’s Opera House, Urbana, Ohio

Klaus’ Opera House, Jamestown, Dakota

Opera House, Westville, Indiana

City Hall, Mineral Point, Wisconsin

City Hall, Lewisburg, West Virginia

Opera House, Denison, Iowa

Opera House, Nevada, Ohio

Opera House, Hoopeston, Illinois

Opera House, Cambridge, Illinois

Turner Hall, LaSalle, Illinois

Kolter’s Opera House, Wausau, Wisconsin

Opera House Moberlv, Missouri

Krotz’s Grand Opera House Defiance, Ohio

Opera House, Montague, Michigan

Opera House Eutaw, Alabama

Opera House, Greyville, Illinois

Opera House, Carthage, Illinois

Masonic Hall, Macomb, Illinois

New Hall, Good Hope Illinois

Music Hall, Eau Claire, Wisconsin

Temperance Hall, Seneca, Illinois

Opera House, Jefferson, Iowa

Opera House, Waupaca, Wisconsin

Soldiers’ Memorial Hall, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Opera House, Mexia, Texas

Opera House, Wilson, North Carolina

Opera House, Newbern, North Carolina

Opera House, Goldsboro, North Carolina

Grand Opera House, Cheyenne, Wyoming

Cosmopolitan Theatre, Miles City, Montana Territory

Arbeiter Hall, Ludington, Michigan

Opera House, West Bay City, Michigan

Opera House, Detroit, Minnesota

Opera House, Lockport, Illinois

Opera House, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin

Opera House, Grass Lake, Michigan

Opera House Demopolis, Alabama

Opera House, Unionville, Missouri

Opera House, Harrodsville, Kentucky

Opera House, Hancock, Michigan

City Hall, New London, Ohio

Opera House, Stevens’ Point, Wisconsin

Sosman & Landis utilized the Central European tradition and immediately succeeded by sheer volume of drops that they produced. There remain remnants of this past rivalry today, as “experts” compare the installations of local artisans in the east and studio artists in the west. There continues to be the perception that mass-produced compositions by large studios are “less” than anything created by a marginally-skilled local artist at a small social hall. There is the idea that backdrops produced in a large scenic studio carry less artistic merit than a one-off by a small-time local artisan. It is difficult for me not to take into account that many of the scenic artists in the larger studios would later achieve international recognition as fine artists, yet the battle continues to rage on.

From the beginning in 1877, Sosman & Landis Studio had an aggressive marketing campaign, run by “Perry” Landis.
This 1894-1895 Catalog presents “Some Reasons Why” new venues should stock their theatre with Sosman & Landis painted scenery and stage machinery.

To be continued…

Author: waszut_barrett@me.com

Wendy Rae Waszut-Barrett, PhD, is an author, artist, and historian, specializing in painted settings for opera houses, vaudeville theaters, social halls, cinemas, and other entertainment venues. For over thirty years, her passion has remained the preservation of theatrical heritage, restoration of historic backdrops, and the training of scenic artists in lost painting techniques. In addition to evaluating, restoring, and replicating historic scenes, Waszut-Barrett also writes about forgotten scenic art techniques and theatre manufacturers. Recent publications include the The Santa Fe Scottish Rite Temple: Freemasonry, Architecture and Theatre (Museum of New Mexico Press, 2018), as well as articles for Theatre Historical Society of America’s Marquee, InitiativeTheatre Museum Berlin’s Die Vierte Wand, and various Masonic publications such as Scottish Rite Journal, Heredom and Plumbline. Dr. Waszut-Barrett is the founder and president of Historic Stage Services, LLC, a company specializing in historic stages and how to make them work for today’s needs. Although her primary focus remains on the past, she continues to work as a contemporary scene designer for theatre and opera.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *