Part 592: The Approach to Jerusalem
In 1908, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Starting on Wheeling, W. Va. Masonic work, a good contract and I enjoyed the work. The Darius Palace and the approach to Jerusalem were very interesting things to do, and a dozen others with the same amount of interest for others to do.” Instead of starting with the venue, I began with the Sosman & Landis scenic design for “Darius Palace” yesterday. Today, I am looking at the “Approach to Jerusalem” design, also titled the “Road to Jerusalem,” by some scenic studios.
Moses’ statement suggests that he found these two specific compositions interesting to paint. This is a consistent sentiment, as throughout his memoirs Moses mentions that Masonic scenery was enjoyable to work on due to the variety. It may also imply that the standard design used for past installations changed and was now more interesting. For example, in 1908 the Darius Palace scene design took on a new look when the composition shifted from vibrant colors, to a classical ivory interior with colorful garlands.
The approach to Jerusalem was a fairly straightforward design that included a cut drop and backdrop. The cut drop depicted the beginning of a dirt road that continued into the distance toward a walled city. This particular cut drop was able to be used for multiple Scottish Rite degrees, not with just the Jerusalem backdrop. The design was generic enough to be pair with not only an ancient city, but also a variety of other exterior backdrops.
The beauty of Scottish Rite stage designs is their versatility, with many being relatively generic compositions that could span continents and eras. Unfortunately, many Scottish Rite stage crews and degree directors do not understand that there are many more compositions that can be created beyond the specific shipping label located on the stage right side. For example, the cut drop for the approach to Jerusalem was also paired with the wood drop. Instead of a road to Jerusalem, it became a path into the forest or to a distant medieval castle. This shifted the setting from a biblical one to a medieval one. Just as there were certain masking drops to accompany many scenes – drapery, wood, rough cut stone, or classical – there were many cut drops that would alter the stage setting.
I have noticed that over time, there were certain stage designs for Scottish Rite degree production that “evolved,” while others remained cemented in the past. I am not simply suggesting that the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite altered its stage settings for specific degrees more frequently than the Southern Jurisdiction. Although this is true, I believe that there is much more to Moses’ statement. The 1908 the scenic interpretation for the two sixteenth degree settings “evolved,” breaking from past designs.
In some cases, scenic studios unified the Scottish Rite degree work and established a standard expectation for every Valley throughout the United States. In the nineteenth century, many of the theatrical interpretations for degree work on the Scottish Rite stage were similar. Both the Southern Jurisdiction and Northern Jurisdiction purchased similar settings for their respective degree productions. During the first decade of the twentieth century, this began to change.
To place the production of Scottish Rite scenery in context, we also need to look at the studio artists at Sosman & Landis during that time. Often a variety of scenic artists contributed to the production of new Scottish Rite scenery collection. In scenic studios during the early twentieth century, many of the scenic artists specialized in a particular genre – draperies, exteriors, interiors, etc. This was a shift from the previous generations of scenic artists – it was implemented for efficiency, increasing the overall speed of production. This also makes sense from an efficiency standpoint; the studio would want and artist familiar with the scene to do the work, one who had painted it before. Moses was known for his exterior woodland scenes, however, he was trained as a scenic artist during a period in American history when theatre worked necessitated that itinerant artists be equally skilled in all genres.
Keep in mind that in 1908, Moses had been working as a scenic artist for 44 years. His skill at painting landscapes was well-known and sought after, but he could also paint draperies, exteriors, ornament and figures. It would certainly make sense that he painted both the Darius Palace and the approach to Jerusalem drops for Wheeling. The approach to Jerusalem was a picturesque landscape with a road winding to a city in the distance. The palace of King Darius was often decorated with floral garlands that held dozens of roses.
It is relatively easy to identify individual artists who produced certain settings for Scottish Rite scenery collections. Although they may currently remain nameless, their paint application is like a signature, and a specific artist can be traced from one collection to another; it just takes time and energy to make the identification. It is obvious when a particular setting is produced by a different hand at Sosman & Landis. I have tracked the painting techniques for various scenes from one Scottish Rite to another. The approach to Jerusalem provides an ideal opportunity to examine aesthetic shifts from 1896 to 1914.
Almost identical Sosman & Landis designs were produced for the Scottish Rite in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1896 and Wichita, Kansas, in 1898. A similar design was again produced in 1914, for the Scottish Rite in Tucson, Arizona. Comparing and contrasting these designs provides an ideal opportunity to examine shifts in composition, artistic interpretation, predominant colors, and scenic art techniques.
To be continued…
