Month: May 2020

Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

During the spring of 1918, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “My fingers itch to get back on special scenery.  This awful grind of stock scenery is and has been almost impossible.”

In 1918, many touring shows still contracted agreements that required theatres to provide stock scenery and props. Moses mentioned stock scenery in an article that he wrote for the Palette & Chisel Club Newsletter in 1927. It was part of a previously written article that Moses titled “Stage Scenery 1918.” Here is what he wrote:

“Thirty years ago most of the scenery was painted in the theatre, a room or paint bridge being arranged on the stage of adjoining room for that purpose. Each theatre furnished the necessary sets for the traveling company, which was headed by some big star. In the larger cities, the theatre employed a scenic artist and an assistant to keep regular stock scenery in good condition and to supply and special scene needed. While the regular stock scenery in each theatre was nearly complete there was always a call for some scene not to be found in stock. As the scene plot was sent ahead and turned over to the scenic artist, the required scene was built and painted. Often the scene was painted on an old drop, or over old framed wings.”

An 1894 catalogue listed various options for stock scenery delivered by Sosman & Landis. Moses painted stock scenery collections for theaters and opera houses nationwide. In 1895 alone, he was credited with painting stock scenery for the Valentine Theatre in Toledo, Ohio; the Lowell Opera House in Massachusetts; the Avenue Theatre in Pittsburg; the Broad Ripple Theatre in Indianapolis; the Hillsboro Theatre in Waterbury, Connecticut; and the Opera House in Racine, Wisconsin. By 1918, Moses was an old hand at stock scenery, and it must have seen mundane. After all, how many kitchen parlors or prisons does one ever want to paint.

The demand for stock scenery remained constant from the late nineteenth century to early twentieth century. The 1894-1895 Sosman & Landis catalogue divided stock scenery installations into three categories: traveling combinations, small opera houses and halls, and ordinary halls. Although I posted this information a few years back. Here are the descriptions.

Set No. 1 was for traveling combinations.  These would be the larger performance venues that booked headliners and large-scale productions.  Stock scenery for these stages included a drop curtain and at least eight backdrops depicting a fancy parlor scene, plain chamber scene, prison scene, wood scene, garden scene, street scene, rocky pass scene, and ocean view scene.  In addition to the drops, there were 4 parlor wings, 4 kitchen wings, 6 wood wings, 2 front wings (tormentors), 1 grand drapery border, 3 sky borders, 3 set rocks, 3 set waters and 1 set cottage. In some cases, the parlor scene and kitchen settings were delivered as an interior box set; 4×8 flats that were lashed together with cord and cleats. Occasionally the interior flats were double-painted with a fancy interior on one side and a rustic interior on the backside.

There is need to clarify a few other terms detailed in the 1894-1895 Sosman & Landis catalogue too. Tormentor wings depicted painted columns with an “elaborate base and rich drapery at the top and side.”   These wings were stationary ones that were set three or four feet back of, and parallel with, the drop curtain.  The grand drapery border was painted to represent rich and massive drapery that matched the drapery on the tormentor wings.

Set No. 2 was for smaller venues, such as 200-500 seat opera houses and halls.  Their stock settings included 1 drop curtain and five drops: parlor scene, kitchen scene, street scene, prison scene, and wood scene.  In addition to the backdrops, there were 4 parlor wings, 4 kitchen wings, 4 wood wings, 2 front wings (tormentors), 1 grand drapery border, 2 sky borders, 3 set rocks, 3 set waters and 1 set cottage.

Set No. 3 was intended for limited spaces, such as an ordinary meeting hall for a social or fraternal organization.  This option included 1 drop curtain and following drops: parlor scene, kitchen scene, street scene, and wood scene.  In addition to the drops, there were 4 interior wings, 4 exterior wings, 2 front wings (tormentors), 1 grand drapery border, 2 front borders, and 2 sky borders.

The catalogue noted that the scenery was created with “extra heavy material painted in bright durable colors, by the best skilled Scenic Painters, and are warranted strictly first-class in every particular.” By 1894, Sosman & Landis advertised, “Over 4,000 places of amusement are to-day using scenery made by our firm.” 

To be continued…

Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett

In 1918, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “In March we did a lot of work for the production of “Cinderella,” to be put on in Oak Park at the High School.”  Unfortunately, an outbreak of the measles closed down the school production that month. On May 12, 1918, the “Chicago Tribune” reported, “The opera ‘Cinderella,’ which was to have been given by students from the Oak Park High School has been indefinitely postponed because of an epidemic of measles among the cast. Three members of the cast are ill” (page 3).

There is no indication that the show was ever rescheduled. However, I did encounter an informative article about measles and the recommendation to wear facemasks. In light of our recent situation with COVID-19, this seems like a timely article to share. After all, the Spanish Flu would follow on the heels of the measles epidemic.

The “Chicago Tribune” included a medical section entitled, “How to Keep Well by Dr. W. A. Evans.” On Nov. 18, 1918, Dr. Evans addressed “The Measles Question” (page 8).  

He wrote to following advice:

“Ask the average man on the street about measles and he will say, ‘Oh, fiddlesticks – don’t amount to a row of pins!’ Ask and health officer the same question and he will say, ‘Very important health department question.’ More children die from measles than from any other form of contagion. It kills more children than diphtheria or scarlet fever. Ask any school principal and he will reply: ‘I don’t know about the severity of the disease, but I know that it upsets the schools more than any other disease.’ Now here are three options, no two which are the same and two almost directly contradictory. All the answers are honest. Why the difference? Measles starts like an ordinary cold. Within a few hours this particular cold differs from an ordinary cold in that the eyes get red. It also differs in degree in that there is more dry cough. In an ordinary cold the cough does not come on until a few days after the nose cold. In the family is accustomed to using a thermometer it will find that the measles cold causes the higher fever of the two. After about three days the measles eruption begins to appear, starting first on the face. The disease is most contagious in the period before the eruption.

As to all those points there is no disagreement In fact, most parents and some school officials say measles is so contagious in this early stage that there is not use trying to stop an epidemic once the disease starts. In this Col. Raymond of the army replies by telling of a time when measles broke out in a command of which he had medical charge. At once he locked all the cases on one house and all the contacts in another barracks and marched the bulk of the command away. The epidemic stopped short.

The mother who has had fortunate experiences with measles in her family tells of a few days of fever and hollow cough, then fading of the eruption, disappearance of fever, and stopping of the hollow cough in about ten days. In this the health officer agrees, but he adds so many children get what are known as complications that the number of deaths form measles in half the United Sates in 1916 was 7,946 and other deaths, really from measles but entered on the record as bronchitis, pleurisy, lung abscess, empyema, but really due in the first instance to measles would bring the total up to at least 16,000.

And right there is where the disagreement comes in. The average man on the street does not know about these cases that went wrong. The health officer knows about them because the death certificates go through his hands and he has been studying them. In olden days we said that the ‘measles struck in’ or that the patient ‘caught cold.’ Recent work indicates that what happens is that the patient gets an infection with a pus coccus called streptococcus hemolyticus.

One great advantage of the discovery is that along with it comes another one having to do with prevention. Not only must the other members of the family be protected against the measles patient, but the measles patient must be protected against them. When measles has him down streptococci from the throats of well members of the family are prone to jump on him and convert a mild disease to a severe one.

To prevent this the patient should wear a face mask. The members of the family in contact with the patient – the mother and those nursing and helping – should wear face masks. Cultures of the throats of the well should be made. Those having no streptococci in their throats and having had measles can take off their masks and stay at home. Those negative as to streptococci and with a history of having had measles can come home if they have been sent away. Those with streptococci in their throats should be sent away. If it is absolutely necessary that any such should stay at home they must wear face masks with care as to minute details.”

In regard to the measles and streptococcal co-infections of 1917-1918, David M. Morens and Jeffrey K. Taubenberger published a paper in 2015 – “A forgotten epidemic that changed medicine: measles in the US Army, 1917-18.”

Here is the abstract in case you want to read it: A US army-wide measles outbreak in 1917-18 resulted in more than 95,000 cases and more than 3000 deaths. An outbreak investigation implicated measles and streptococcal co-infections in most deaths, and also characterized a parallel epidemic of primary streptococcal pneumonia in soldiers without measles. For the first time, the natural history and pathogenesis of these diseases was able to be well characterized by a broad-interdisciplinary research effort with hundreds of military and civilian physicians and scientists representing disciplines such as internal medicine, pathology, microbiology, radiology, surgery, preventive medicine, and rehabilitation medicine. A clear conceptualization of bronchopneumonia resulting from viral-bacterial interactions between pathogens was developed, and prevention and treatment approaches were developed and optimized in real time. These approaches were used in the 1918 influenza pandemic, which began as the measles epidemic waned. The outbreak findings remain relevant to the understanding and medical management of severe pneumonia. Here is a link to the paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617519/

To be continued…