Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
There are three personalities that swirl around each other at the Tabor Grand Opera House during the early 1880s – Robert Hopkin, Henry C. Tryon and Henry E. Burcky. Keep in mind that all three artists were credited with painting scenery for the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver between 1881 and 1884.
In 1881, Robert Hopkin painted a drop curtain for the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver and one for the Grand Opera House in Colorado Springs. From 1882-1887, Hopkin was also listed as the scenic artist for the Grand Opera House in Detroit, Michigan, his hometown. Multiple listings in Harry Miner’s Dramatic Directories credit Hopkin with the Detroit Opera House’s stock scenery collection. He may have been their on-site scenic too.
From 1881 until 1882, Henry C. Tryon was repeatedly listed as the scenic artist for the Tabor Grand Opera House in Denver, Colorado. When he traveled for other projects, he was referred to as “Henry C. Tryon of the Tabor Grand Opera House.” From 1883 to 1884 Tryon worked in Salt Lake City, Utah, and Chicago, Illinois. He also painted numerous touring shows during this time.
After Tryon left the Tabor Grand in 1882, his good friend and former partner, Henry E. Burcky, took over the scenic art responsibilities there, and by 1884 was listed as the scenic artist for both Tabor Opera Houses in Denver and Leadville. He remained associated with the two venues through 1890.
Today’s post looks at Tryon’s career in Utah from the fall of 1882 until the end of 1883.
In October 1882, Henry C. Tryon ventured south from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah to paint scenery for the Salt Lake Theatre. By January 1883, Tryon was also working in Springvale, Utah. He painted $1000 worth of stock scenery for the Springvale Theatre Hall, assisted by his younger brother Spencer Tryon. Alfred Lambourne was also working with the Tryon brothers during this time.
Sadly, their paintings in Springvale were destroyed only a few years later. Flames spread to the stage when a mill behind the theatre caught fire, destroying all of the scenic artists’ work. Regardless of the venue’s fate, it was the Springvale project, that secured other work for Tryon in the region. While in Springvale, Tryon shared an employment offer with the local newspaper, subsequently pressuring the Salt Lake Theatre to offer him an immediate position. Since the fall of 1882, Tryon had sporadically painted stock scenes for the Salt Lake Theater. However, he did not hold an official position. This meant that he still remained associated with the Tabor Grand Opera House, as that was his last place of employment.
On January 8, 1883, the “Deseret News” reported, “While in Springville, Mr. H. C. Tryon received a letter from the management of the Grand Opera House, San Francisco, offering him the position of scenic artist of that institution. He sent the letter to the management of the Salt Lake Theatre, who promptly entered into contract with him to do a large amount of work” (page 3).
In the end, Tryon painted 25 stock sets for the Salt Lake Theatre. In the process, he became a regional success. Tryon’s completed scenes were added to the stage as touring productions visited the venue.
On April 22, 1883, the “Salt Lake Herald” reported, “Mr. Henry C. Tryon is still hard at work on scenery for the Salt Lake Theatre. The patrons of the old house have been very much pleased with the new scenes which have been presented of late. Something new in the scenic line is shown at nearly every performance, and the end is not yet, by any mean., There is still much work to be done before the theatre is thoroughly stocked, and thoroughly stocked it will be before the mangers cry, “enough!” There will not be a foot of old canvas in the building when Tryon leaves for pastures new. The best scene that has been exhibited lately was used in the first act of the Harrison’s “Photos,” and it has received a vast amount of praise from all who had the fortune to be present, and who can appreciate a fine thing when they see it. The scene is an Elizabethan parlor, with high wainscoting and a deep cornice of dark oak, decorated richly with gold, the walls hung with brilliant crimson damask, relieved at the top and bottom, next to the cornice and wainscoting, with a twelve-inch band of black and gold. The centre of the room, for a width of twelve feet, appears to project about eighteen inches; in front of this again is an elaborate centre-door, on each side of which are polished gray marble columns, supporting the massive framework of the door, the architecture of which reaches above the cornice, The composition and color are of the simplest description possible, but the richness of the effect produced by the skillful handling of lights and shadows from the massive projectives, and the gradations of color – the light flashing from the polished surface of oak and marble, and the character of dignity and grandeur, which has not been lost sight of in single detail – give a singular effect of realism to the work, which appears to be not a representation, but really the aristocratic abode of some wealthy English lord, possessing the most elegant and refined taste, and with almost unlimited means at his command. For richness, beauty, harmony and nobility, it is not easy to see how the subject could be excelled, and we are not surprised to hear that the members of the dramatic companies who have seen it, state that it is the most chaste and elegant scene if its kind, in design and color and in character, to be found in the whole country. We congratulate Mr. Tryon, and are pleased to see the interest he takes in all he does; and if the work referred to above is not art in its truest sense, then we would be happy to know just what art is” (page 12)
The 1884-1885 issue of “Harry Miner’s American Dramatic Directory,” describes the Salt Lake Theatre as having a seating capacity of 1,850, with a stage that measured 65’ x 70’. The listing also describes a proscenium opening of 28’-0” x 32’-0” and 18’-0” groove heights. There was 52-0” from the stage floor to the rigging loft, suggesting that much scenery was flown out of sight during a scene change, but grooves were available for wings and other flat stock scenery carried by touring productions.
By July 22, 1883 “Salt Lake Daily” reported, “The improvements which have been in progress at the Salt Lake Theatre during the past nine or ten months, under the direction of Henry C. Tryon, the noted scenic artist, have attracted a great deal of attention from theatrical men generally. Especially is this true of those professionals who had been here prior to the changes (referred to in detail from time to time in these columns) as they have progressed. It is needless to say surprise is universal when the marked change that has taken place is noticed, and the expression invariably is that one would never have believed such important improvements could have been effected in so brief a period… the changes which have been effected in that building would strike the attention with greater force than that of a casual observer, or even a theatrical man whose opportunities noticing the difference have been less favorable.”
It is important to note that Tryon was not simply painting new scenes, he was engineering new stage machinery for the Salt Lake theatre. His changes to the system made it easier for touring productions to install their scenery.
The newspaper also interviewed theatrical manager, Marcus R. Mayer about Tryon’s work. Mayer commented that the work completed under the direction of Tryon supported “metropolitan advantages.” Mayer stated, “I can imagine the surprise and delight with which the Kiralfys will look about them when they first set foot on the stage. We will be able to present our scenery here with its full effect, and that is something and that will be something we will be able to do in very few places after leaving here. Tryon is evidently a man who knows much about stage requirement as any person since, as I am informed, the extensive changes have been made by his direction and mainly under his supervision.”
Mayer was then asked, “By the way, what do you think of Tryon as an artist?” Mayer’s response, “Tryon? We he has a national reputation. The fact that he is engaged to paint the scenes is a guaranty that the scenes outfit will be on par with any theatre in the United States. He is none of your fellows who depend on village theatre for a livelihood; his services are in demand all the time and the only thing that beats my penetration is that so expensive an artist could be obtained to come to Salt Lake. The scenes already painted are the equal of anything in stock in the country.” Mayer ended his interview stating, “The management of the Salt Lake Theatre foresaw just what I’ve told you, and knowing the companies now coming could not endure the old arrangements, they determined to fit the stage up first-class modern style, and Tryon was just the man for the conspiracy.”
To be continued…
