Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 356 – The Little Rock Scottish Rite Scenery from 1896, 1899, 1902 and 1923

Part 356: The Little Rock Scottish Rite Scenery from  1896, 1899, 1902 and 1923

Today, we return to the story of the Scottish Rite scenery collection that was produced by Sosman & Landis for Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1896. Some of his collection was expanded in 1899. When the new building was planned in 1901, a new scenery collection was purchased from Sosman & Landis to fit the larger stage. Scenery from the old building (1896-1899) was gifted to the New Orleans Scottish Rite in 1906.

In Little Rock, membership continued to increase, again necessitating a larger space. In 1923, this second collection (the 1902 scenery) was returned to Thomas G. Moses, president of the Sosman & Landis Studio, for credit on the purchase of a new scenery collection in 1923. The new scenery was for the massive Albert Pike Memorial Temple in Little Rock. Original backdrops from the 1902 Little Rock scenery collection were resold to the Pasadena Scottish Rite during 1925 for their new building. That same year, Thomas G. Moses joined the Scottish Rite in Pasadena; he was a member of their first class in the new building.

The 1902 Albert Pike Consistory building that was expanded in 1913.
The Albert Pike Memorial Temple that replaced the 1902 Albert Pike Consistory building.        

I was contacted by a Little Rock Mason for many years about the 1923 scenery collection. He worked at the Scottish Rite and would periodically call to get advice, enquiring about everything from backdrop repair to mural restoration. This gentleman had no theatre experience, artistic training, nor rigging knowledge. During every conversation, we would talk about the history of their collection. We would discuss the significance of the backdrops, and I would place them within the context of both Masonic history and theatre history. Each time during a conversation he would say, “Wow. I just wish that I could convince my boss to bring you down and talk to the membership about what we have here.”

In every telephone conversation, my Little Rock Mason would consistently explain that his superiors had no intention of hiring anyone to help fix the scenery; he was going to have to figure out how to do it by himself if they wanted to use a damaged one for the next reunion. So we would game plan for what was possible on his end, as he would be working alone. “They really don’t understand the stage or what needs to be done here,” he repeatedly explained to me over the years.

The Albert Pike Memorial building stage. Picture posted online. Note that a drop is being worked on and the one ladder would be the one that my friend used to lower the scene all by himself.
The Albert Pike Memorial building auditorium.

He acquired my name and number from the “boys in McAlester.” It was one of the many times that he was desperately reaching out for help and seeking advice after a backdrop ripped. Through the grapevine, he discovered that the Scottish Rite in McAlester, Oklahoma, had hired a “little gal from the north” to “fix” their scenery. They passed along my number and he gave me a call.

A backdrop from the Albert Pike Memorial building. Picture was posted online. Notice the central fold in the fabric running vertical along the scene. This suggests that their was a pucker in the fabric when it was attached to the batten after a repair.

Each time I picked up the phone, I planned to be occupied for an hour or so, hearing about his scenery problems and all of the administrative obstacles. I envisioned a white-haired gentleman who still was full of “piss and vinegar.” He was skeptical of the “higher-ups” and wanted to do his best, as he loved their scenery collection and the backstage area. I learned a lot about the administration in Little Rock from his unique point of view. Over the years, I passed along as much information as possible to do adequate job, especially as he would be working alone without any additional sets of hands. The work was going to happen anyway, so he might as well have some guidance, albeit was from a few states away.

A backdrop from the Albert Pike Memorial building. Picture was posted online. This is the treasure chamber for the 15th degree.

They were only a few things that ever made me cringe when chatting on the phone. The most memorable was his describing how he could remove a backdrop from the lines all by himself. He put large eye screws in the stage floor and secured the lines to them, as he slowly unhooked each of the three pick points and removed the backdrop. Eek. I envisioned what the Little Rock stage floor must look like – large holes from the eye screws everywhere. He explained that it was a less than an ideal situation, but there was no one else to help and his employers refused to hire anyone to help with the repair. Once again, his situation depicted that those who understand the significance of historic scenery collections are often not in charge. In fact, these Masonic historians, or stewards of the backdrops, are devoid of any type of support or financial assistance when a backdrop is damaged.

A backdrop from the Albert Pike Memorial building. Picture was posted online. The is the hell scene for the 18th degree.

I know that the current 1923 collection has been extensively patched and handled over the years. Their collection won’t last forever and my friend has since retired. Hopefully, his replacement cares as much about their historic scenery collection as his predecessor.

To be continued…

Tales of a scenic artist and scholar – Pasadena Departure Day

Exterior of the Scottish Rite in Pasadena, California.
A little after 8:00 AM I arrived at the Scottish Rite. My goal was to attach the top and bottom battens by 10:00AM so that we could hang the scene before my departure at 2:00PM. This should be a fairly simple task to accomplish…if the battens had been labeled per my request when they were removed from the drop. If these were the only wooden sandwich battens along the back wall of the stage, that would be one thing – but there were others.
 
So I started to pull from the pile the ones that I thought might be for the scene. On top of this, one of the two volunteers was not going to make it. In a way, this was a little bit of a relief as the “hunting” was going to be problematic at best. The only worse thing would be an assistant randomly pulling lumber and asking, “Is this it?” A one point, my sole volunteer pointed to a stack of neatly labeled lumber on one of the racks and suggested that the pile might be from our drop. As I looked at the handwriting on the masking tape labels, I said, “Those are MY labels from the last time I was here and we had to remove the bottom battens from a damaged leg drop.”
 
There are a few fortunate things that happened during the search. The first was that the bottom batten was painted to match the scene. The second was that the top batten had paint slopped on it from the 1940s when the scene was touched up. All I had to do was match the screw holes, right? Well, kind of… You see there were two sets of screw holes – the first from when the scenery was installed in Little Rock, the second from when the scenery was installed in Pasadena. It took some time, but I was attaching the battens by 10:00AM.
 
Over the years, I have gotten pretty smart about how I attach the fabric to the battens. The big thing is that I use tables and work standing up. This saves my back and time. Well, this method only works with a minimum of three people, ideally four. I had one – so I started to create my guidelines on the floor, determined to occasionally stand up and stretch my back. Twenty years ago, attaching battens on the floor was a snap – no so much anymore. There was not much help as my volunteer could not easily kneel on the floor either. Looking like I was stretching for yoga, I slowly scooted along the filthy floor, thankful that I had a change of clothes for my flight that afternoon.
 
Now, the second problem – locating the screws. We had picked up new screws as sometimes the old hardware was compromised during the removal from the batten. The Valley requested that I reuse the slotted screws. Ok. I did, but all couldn’t be located at first. Ironically, my assistant found the screws on top of a table in a stage left alcove. I cannot tell you how humorous I found his finding the screws next to the mannequin of the “dead Hiram” that was laying on the table. Of all the places to find them! So with all of the screws, except three that had snapped during the initial removal, I completed attaching the battens.
 
Then we waited for my rigging crew to show up, after I sent the “ready to go” text. Nothing like having a professional crew on standby. Everything worked beautifully and the drop was up in the air by 1:30PM – just in time.
 
This project was the perfect “dry run” for the upcoming restoration work. I have my rigging crew and am thrilled with their personalities and abilities. This was also a good run for the Valley as they now know me, my work, the complexity of handling historic scenes and the hanging of backdrops.
 
Tomorrow, I am back to the storyline in my blog about Thomas G. Moses in the year 1896.
The new solar panels over the Pasadena Scottish Rite parking lot, providing shade for the cars and power for the building. The is really a healthy and vibrant Valley that is looking toward the future.
 
To be continued…

Tales of a scenic artist and scholar – Day 2 in Pasadena

I was able to finish the fabric repair on the crucifixion drop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite yesterday. The patches needed to fully dry overnight, so that the battens could be attached this morning before my departure. Everything appears to be still on schedule.

The central damage to the crucifixion scene at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.
Preparing to join the two halves of the crucifixion drop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.

The reason that I love scenery restoration work is the uncertainty and surprise. You can never be positive of the outcome. Dye batches, textile mills, and the stage environment all wreak havoc with the scene over decades; there are no guarantees or standard guidelines to follow. Trying to rejoin a drop that has been ripped in half has a dozen possibilities for an unsuccessful end.

There could be puckering along the patch as the historic fabric and the fabric of the new patch shrink at differing rates. The glue can bleed through to the painted surface, causing unsightly dye lines. The fabric can have stretched to such an extent that the painted composition is a ½-inch off. Wrinkles may be introduced to the scene while gently pulling the two sides together as the fabric will stretch when damp before tightening up again. The list is unending and one cannot anticipate many of the problems that will be encountered.

Finished repair after attaching thirteen reinforcement strips and the central patch for the crucifixion scene at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.

Yesterday, everything went like clockwork as I slowly pieced the scene together with a series of patches. The patch must absorb the majority of the liquid in the glue before placing it onto a historic backdrop; this prevents potential dye lines. However, there is a small window of time when the patch is “perfect” for attaching to the scene before it becomes too dry to still adhere to the fabric. I was lucky today and had good help.

View of the various patches applied to the back of the crucifixion backdrop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.

For all of the patches, the fabric was so thin that the glue immediately bled through to the painted surface, yet I was fortunate as there were minimal dye lines. I had to determine the perfect amount of glue and set time before applying the patch, preventing unsightly dye lines yet allowing the patch to hold. If there is not enough glue or the “set up” time is too long, the patch won’t stick or stay secure. You don’t know if the patch is successful and undetectable from the audience until the repair is fully dried. Every step is a gamble.

I waited an hour for the center seam to dry and then I began attaching the reinforcement strips along the top and the bottom edges. For the center seam, I joined the two pieces “face up.” I used this same technique for the 4” reinforcement strips at the top and bottom. Luckily for me, one of the volunteers showed up to help me with the reinforcement strips as they were over 20 feet long.

Then, I dealt with the splitting seams in the translucent areas. Although I used theatrical gauze for the central rip, the remainder of the seams were reinforced with a small amount of glue applied to the underside of the seam. This secured it without using a 1” strip that may be visible in the end. There were many other small patches to place, but it all went well and the repaired scene was completed.

It was a successful repair as the president of the building association couldn’t detect the original central rip.

In the afternoon, we met with the local TD who would secure a rigging crew to hang the scene. By the way, when is one of the worst times to locate a certified rigger in Pasadena? That would be immediately after the Oscars – this week. We are still hoping to get the drop up in the air before my departure. That is is something that I had not thought possible upon assessing the damage upon my arrival two days ago. So, off I go in great hopes that everything will continue to work out. Attaching battens is as risky as attaching a patch, and I am sure that there will be surprises along the way.

To be continued…

Tales of a Scenic artist and Scholar. Restoration work at the Scottish Rite in Pasadena, California.

As the Song Goes, “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” (cue the whistling).  It was an appropriate tune while repairing the crucifixion scene at the Pasadena Scottish Rite Cathedral yesterday.

Last November, the Crucifixion backdrop at Scottish Rite in Pasadena, California ripped in two. The damage was instigated by a horizontal tear near the top batten on the stage right side. I had notified the Valley about this impending problem during my visit in August 2016 when I was evaluating their scenery collection. At the time, the rip had temporarily “paused” at a vertical seam. It took fifteen months before the rip would finally break through that seam and continue across the drop. Near the center of the drop, there was another weak spot in the fabric, causing the rip to change direction and become a vertical tear.

The damage that I was anticipating at the Pasadena Scottish Rite. A few large tears in the crucifixion backdrop.

In addition to this massive damage there were many other problems, punctures and previous repairs throughout the drop. One of the patches was attached to the drop with hot melt glue, making me cringe as this particular adhesive destroys historic fabric.

This hot melt glue patch is not the first one that I have encountered. Have I mentioned how much I hate people who use hot melt glue on historical scenery?
The damage caused to the fabric substrate when trying to remove hot melt glue. No, freezing it does not work like gum on a shirt.

It is impossible to remove without destroying the fabric, but cannot remain as it does not provide adequate support. In short hot melt glue cause more damage to historic fabric than almost anything else – except water. All of the previous patches on the Crucifixion drop were also starting to fail and needed to be replaced.

If this damage weren’t bad enough, there were two other factors were at play: extremely thin fabric and a later application of flame retardant.

The rust tinge caused by applying flame retardant to the back side of a drop that is already painted. It takes a few decades to appear, but flame retardant sprayed “after the fact” is a death sentence to historic scenery.
Notice how thin the fabric is for the Crucifixion backdrop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite Cathedral.

The fabric was akin to fine theatrical gauze. I had never encountered such a fine backdrop material before and was shocked at the choice. The translucent areas had been left as raw muslin and darkened over time, especially with the application of flame retardant. The particular formula of flame retardant in 1949 stained much of the fabric, giving everything a slight look of pale rust stains. Flame retardant, applied “after the fact,” also left standard damage that included flaking paint and crunchy fabric. The combination of these two factors made some areas of the drop feel like old tissue paper, ready to crumble at a moments notice. The combination of all the above-mentioned elements contributed to an even larger problem; all of the vertical seams were starting to fail.

One of eleven failing vertical seams.

I had anticipated the two large rips and needing to replace some previous patches. I had not anticipated the failing of all seams, nor had the pictures depicted this particular issue as I corresponded with the Scottish Rite representatives over the past few months. I had allotted a two-day repair with hanging the drop on the morning of my departure. There would be no extra time for me as I had another project waiting at home.

Immediately upon my arrival at the Burbank airport, we dropped off my supplies at the Temple before heading to my hotel. My flight had been delayed and it was after 1AM in the morning when the plane landed. Upon visiting the Scottish Rite, I assessed the damage and felt that familiar sinking feeling of impending doom. As the damage was far more extensive that anticipated, I began my preparations for the next day by 2AM.

Button on the Pasadena Scottish Rite light board.

Unless I managed to put in about five days time in 2 ½ days, the drop would never be ready to hang before my departure. I knew that I would never be able to see it hang, but I could make sure the drop was repaired. Yesterday was a long day, 9:00AM until 11:30PM. On the bright side, I will likely make my target. What I did manage to accomplish was the following: carefully removing the remaining wooden battens; preparing the space for restoration; cleaning the damaged areas; and reinforcing the splitting with vertical patches.

One more day of my life spent crawling around on my hands and knees over historic scenery. Regardless of the physical strain, lower back paint, and sore shoulders, I was blissfully happy (as almost always). There is something wonderful about trying to revive a scene that most would deem unsalvageable and likely find its way into a dumpster. For me, it would be unconscionable to walk away, explaining that the vertical seams were failing and no amount of help could salvage the torn remnants. I decided to look at it as a challenge a make the best of my time here.

In the morning, I presented the various options for repair to the President of the Temple Building Association in light of the new discoveries. We decided to apply a vertical patch to each seam as there was not time or material to back the entire drop. There are several reasons for selecting this method, timeframe being the most important. So, I cleaned the seam and began slowly patching each of the eleven vertical seams. I needed to finish all of them the first day, so that I could focus on the actual rip next and the reinforcement of the top and bottom the second day.

A photo of my progress while patching the splitting seams on the crucifixion drop at the Pasadena Scottish Rite. I will use different fabric for patches in the translucent section of the sky so that they are not visible when backlit.
A view of the backdrop repair occurring on the stage form the light booth at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.

Hi ho, hi ho, it’s off to work I go.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 355 – California Here I Come!

Part 355: California Here I Come!

Thomas G. Moses started preliminary negotiations for the resale of the Little Rock scenery to the Pasadena, California, in 1921. Moses would later join the Fraternity and become a member of the Pasadena Scottish Rite. I want to take a moment to explore why he possibly spent so much time trying to relocate the old Little Rock scenery to Pasadena. Furthermore, why would he join the Scottish Rite in Pasadena and not Chicago, especially when he was dividing his time between Chicago and Oakland? I believe that he preferred the degree work of the Southern Jurisdiction; the designs were more familiar to him. In 1926, Moses wrote, “I feel that we are a trifle shy on the proper designs for the northern jurisdiction, which are somewhat different from our southern, of which we have done by far the most.”

Moses also had an artistic connection and an emotional attachment to the 1896 Little Rock scenery collection. As a member of Pasadena, he would continue to see not only some of his best work, but also that of his good friend and mentor, David Austin Strong, another Sosman & Landis artists who Moses credited as the “Daddy of Masonic Design.” I think it was much more than making a dollar on a used scenery collection, or even trying to offload some old product. I believe that Moses carefully considered which Scottish Rite that he would join, and what painted scenery he would want to see during degree work. He also donated fine art to the Pasadena Scottish Rite when he became a member.

So, the original Little Rock scenery still hangs above the Pasadena stage and is used. Although it has been repeatedly tampered with over the years, and added to by other studios, the remnants of late-nineteenth century art are visible, as well as the individual paintings of Moses and Strong.

Today’s scenery at Pasadena, Yankton, Salina, and Austin all share one thing in common; they are some of the earliest installations in the Southern Jurisdiction and all have backdrops painted by Strong. His work is some of the most beautiful scenic art that I have ever encountered and he was credited as being the last American scenic artist to represent the Dusseldorf school. Walter Burridge affectionately referred to Strong as “Old Trusty.” Fellow scenic artists heralded Strong’s skill, his “facile brush,” and his “quality of opaqueness” (Chicago Tribune, Dec. 18, 1892).

An example of what I believe to be David Austin Strong’s work. This is a detail from a Little Rock drop currently hanging in Pasadena.
An example of what I believe to be David Austin Strong’s work. This is a detail from a Little Rock drop currently hanging in Pasadena.

I am currently in Pasadena Scottish Rite to repair the crucifixion backdrop at the Scottish Rite; it ripped in half and plummeted to the stage. A few years back, I completed a similar repair in Grand Forks when their Hell scene split in two. The Pasadena version, however, is almost beyond repair as there is other extensive damage throughout the composition. My flight arrived quite early this morning, after a series of delays, so the day is starting out a little slow.

Luckily for me, there will be some “dry time” while I am on site completing the repair. I intend to look for more clues indicative of the studio practices at Sosman & Landis from the late-nineteenth- through early-twentieth century. If anything, I have promised Rick Boychuk some detailed rigging pictures as I believe that the system may be from the 1902 Albert Pike Consistory in Little Rock.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 354: The First Little Rock Scottish Rite Scenery Collection – 1896, 1899 and 1902

 

Part 354: The First Little Rock Scottish Rite Scenery Collection: 1896, 1899 and 1902

The first three times that Scottish Rite scenery was manufactured by Sosman & Landis for Little Rock, Arkansas, were 1896, 1899 and 1902. They were likely three expansions to the same collection that found a permanent home in the 1902 Albert Pike Consistory building. An entirely new scenery collection replaced this combination in 1924; it was also produced by Sosman & Landis and created for the Albert Pike Memorial Temple.

The first Scottish Rite scenery collection was delivered in 1896 to the Albert Pike Cathedral; this scenery was for the Little Rock Scottish Rite on Center Street. A Jewish synagogue was remodeled and equipped for $12,000. The 1896 collection was expanded in 1899 when additional scenery was purchased for the same space. The Scottish Rite remained in the converted synagogue until September 1902 when the Scottish Rite Consistory was completed. As with many Valleys, the dramatic increase in membership demanded a larger home, so a second building was constructed, moving the Scottish Rite from Center Street to the northwest corner of 8th and Scott. This new building was remodeled and enlarged by 1913; the expansion incorporated the 1902 building into the complex, but added a projecting front bay and triangular pediment supported by four fluted Ionic columns.

Picture from 1925 Souvenir program depicting the 1902 Albert Pike Consistory and its remodel in 1913.

There was a fire on August, 27, 1919, that burned down a Masonic building in Little Rock, but it was not the Albert Pike Consistory; it was the Masonic Temple building. Fire destroyed the seven-story Masonic Temple complex where the Grand Lodge of Arkansas and the York Bodies were located at 5th and Main. However, the destruction of the Grand Lodge and York Rite spaces partially instigated the planning and construction of a new Masonic complex in Little Rock – the 1924 Albert Pike Memorial Temple. This new building would house all of the Masonic Bodies in Little Rock, including the Scottish Rite. Ground was broken for this new structure on December 3, 1921; the cornerstone laid on May 11, 1922, and the building dedicated by May 12, 1924. The cost of the 1924 three-story building was $1.5 million dollars.

The 1924 Albert Pike Memorial building in Little Rock, Arkansas, pictured in a 1925 Souvenir program.

Thomas G. Moses’ resumé lists the scenery for Little Rock’s 1896 and 1902 installations, but not the 1899 scenic additions. That year Moses was primarily out of the studio, traveling and contemplating another departure from Sosman & Landis. By 1900, Moses left Sosman & Landis to form a new partnership with Will Hamilton in New York City until 1904 (Moses & Hamilton). His taking credit for the 1902 scenery collection suggests that it was the same 1896/1899 scenery, or another expansion of the original scenery collection. Even the 1904 “New Age Magazine” article describing in detail the Albert Pike Consistory did not suggest the purchase of a brand new scenery collection for the building.

Here is an excerpt from the article, written by SGIG Charles E. Rosenbaum. This article really established Little Rock degree productions as the gold standard for degree work in the Southern Jurisdiction:

“It is claimed, and we do not doubt that it is true, that the stage equipment in Little Rock is the most perfect in America – not only for Masonic purposes, for which it is used exclusively, but from any point of view. It is said by theatrical experts that nowhere else in America, with the possible exception of one theater in New York, and one in Chicago, it is possible to produce either the scenic or electric effects that can be produced on this stage. There are over one hundred drops all so perfectly counterweighted that the heaviest as well as the lightest in weight moves easier than a well-balanced window sash in a private residence. In addition to the drops, there are nearly one hundred set pieces of various sizes, to make the scenic equipment complete, and with the elaborate incidental property the scenic equipment is one of great magnitude.

The electric equipment is perhaps more elaborate, and of greater magnitude, if such a thing can be possible, and some ideas of its capacity may be gathered when it is known that with the numerous border rows, ground rows, strips, bunch lights, arc projectors, lens boxes and spot lights, there is a capacity of more than six thousand sixteen-candle-power lights on the stage alone. All these are handled with great effect and with the precision of beauty through the medium of a specially designed switch board, the creation of Brother Bestor G. Brown, who has given much thought and labor to stage and electric equipment, and is a recognized authority on the subject. It must be understood that a Scottish Rite stage is not to be conceived as a theatrical stage, for when so considered much of its effective use is destroyed, but when used as a combination with the floor of the auditorium, giving to the initiate a beautiful picture for the eye, while at the same time he is lending an attentive ear to the lessons that are being taught, the use of such a stage will be understood and correspondingly valued.”

Notice at this point that Rosenbaum is really walking a very fine line, knowing that Pike had condemned melodramatic productions for degree work. He is defending the implementation and use of degree productions.

The article continues: “The Bodies of Little Rock were pioneers in the use of a stage in the Southern Jurisdiction. It was to be expected that when they constructed their present magnificent and perfectly equipped building, the experience gained not only through their own efforts but through those of others who, in the meantime, had adopted the use of the Scottish Rite purposes, would give them just what, in fact, they have, the most perfect one in the land. Our experience was of great value in designing and equipping this building, which would we think, be credit to even the largest city in the United States. For this reason, it is particularly noticeable and a source of admiration of the part of all who visit it. Many Brethren of distinction have come from great distances on committees, or as the representatives of Bodies located elsewhere, for the purpose of observing its excellent arrangement and equipment and utilizing them in other buildings.”

The 1902 scenery for the Albert Pike Consistory is still used, just by another Scottish Rite Valley – Pasadena, California. In an interesting turn of events, I depart for Pasadena this afternoon to repair one of their scenes. I will take a break from my blog for the next few days to cover my project for the Pasadena Scottish Rite.

Original shipping label on bottom batten for the Scottish Rite scenery. This scene is now used at the Scottish Rite in Pasadena, California.
The backside of a scene in Pasadena, California, that depicts the original label and size of the scene for Little Rock Arkansas measuring 16 x 30. The fabric extensions were previously painted panels that were sewn on to the Little Rock drop.
Camp scene consisting of two leg drops and a backdrop for the 1902 Albert Pike Consistory Building. The backdrop and second leg drop for this scene are now used at the Pasadena Scottish Rite.
The original backdrop created for the 1902 Albert Pike Cathedral, now hanging in the Pasadena Scottish Rite. The first leg drop was not included in the scenery purchase from Little Rock negotiated by Thomas G. Moses in 1923.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 353 – 1898 Scottish Rite Scenery for Wichita, Kansas

Part 353: 1898 Scottish Rite Scenery for Wichita, Kansas

Bestor G. Brown set his sites on a new project after completing the Albert Pike Cathedral in Little Rock, Arkansas – Wichita, Kansas. Keep in mind that Brown was a leader with a magnetic personality, well known for his eloquence. He was frequently praised for his deep understanding of Masonic ritual and its theatrical interpretation on a Scottish Rite stage. Brown had many loyal fans throughout the course of his career, not just in Kansas, but throughout the country. All of these factors made Brown a natural to sell fraternal supplies and promote degree productions. But there was also something else that made him unstoppable – he was also working from the inside out.

In addition to representing M. C. Lilley & Co., Brown was the stage director for the Wichita Consistory. This allowed him to speak with clients from a position of experience and deep understanding of the demands for various degrees. He wasn’t just a member, he was an extremely active member. As active members, it only took a few key individuals to systematically market the new degree paraphernalia. A fairly small group of individuals established the “gold standard” and it became the most sought after degree experience to share with the Fraternity. Because they were all members, these men were able to successfully communicate with degree participants and degree directors.

Even though Brown’s primary residence was in Chicago from 1892 to 1898, he remained extremely active in Kansas Masonry, as well as other fraternal orders such as the Odd Fellows and the Knights of Pythias. I cannot imagine where he found the time to do it all. He was a salesman who intimately knew the fraternal market and what his clients really needed in each area for a successful production or ceremony. He was able to speak their language as both a member and a degree participant.

In Wichita, Brown recommended the purchase and renovation of an existing building. A stage for degree productions was included in the renovation plans during 1898, led by Brown. The Valley of Wichita purchased the Young Men’s Christian Association for $20,339.90 and during January 1898, and extensively remodeled the space to include a 300-seat auditorium. The planning and construction was similar to that in Little Rock, during 1896.

The Wichita Scottish Rite Bodies renovated an existing building to include a stage in 1898. The building was enlarged again to included a new auditorium and banquet hall less than a decade later. Photo showing new addition on right, ca. 1907.

The second member from Wichita to aid in the theatrical interpretations of Scottish Rite degree work was Henry Wallenstein. Born in Cincinnati, Ohio, Wallenstein moved to Wichita at the age of twenty-seven and entered the mercantile business, becoming a co-owner of the business by 1886. As with Brown, Wallenstein was also a well-known “staging expert” for the Scottish Rite degree productions in the area. Later, the Wichita Scottish Rite bodies noted Wallenstein’s contribution to the successful dramatization of degree work as his outstanding achievement in Masonry. Both Wallenstein and Brown greatly facilitated the Southern Jurisdiction’s inclusion of theatrically interpreted degree work on Scottish Rite stages throughout Kansas and the region. With the backing of M. C. Lilley & Co. and the assistance of Sosman & Landis they were on a roll, and unstoppable. There was too much money being made from the initiation of new members to cause the Supreme Council to shut down these new activities.

So by 1899, Brown had returned to living in Topeka, Kansas, and was deeply involved in the planning of the new 1900 Guthrie Scottish Rite stage. Immediately after the Wichita Scottish Rite was completed, the SGIG of Oklahoma (Harper S. Cunningham) brought in Brown, Wallenstein and Charles E. Rosenbaum to help with his new project. Cunningham would later be heralded as the Scottish Rite’s “Temple Builder.” He was involved with not only the Scottish Rite stage in Guthrie, but also the first one in McAlester, Oklahoma, before moving to Santa Fe, New Mexico.

This is where is gets interesting. The three brought extensive knowledge and experience to the project. Cunningham watched them incite enthusiasm and anticipation for the new Masonic space. In later years, Cunningham would use this same technique in Santa Fe, New Mexico. There, he would attain the support of the membership and prepare them for the new stage as their building was being planned (the 1912 Moorish-revival style complex). In 1908, Cunningham would negotiate the purchase of the original McAlester scenery for Santa Fe.

Drop curtain pictured at the McAlester Scottish Rite, also called “the Tabernacle” in 1904.
Same drop curtain purchased by the Santa Fe Scottish Rite in 1908 to practice degree productions while their new building was being planned. The picture is from the Masonic Hall on Water Street in 1909 with Harper S. Cunningham seated in the center.

At this same time, some of the original 1898 scenery from Wichita was purchased by Yankton, Scottish Rite. This was after the Wichita Scottish Rite building added a larger auditorium and dining hall.

Scene produced by Sosman & Landis for the 1898 Wichita Scottish Rite stage. Image from 1898 Fall Reunion program.
Same scenery as pictured above in 1898 Fall Reunion program for Wichita Scottish Rite. The scenery original produced for Wichita is currently used by the Yankton Scottish Rite.
The original Scottish Rite scenery location is still visible on the backside of scenery currently used in Yankton. South Dakota.
Backside of a scene depicting an original Sosman & Landis shipping label. This 1908 shipping label is identical to one found on a Winona Scottish Rite counterweight arbor, dating from 1909.

Records would also indicate that Yankton purchased some of the original Guthrie scenery when M. C. Lilley divided the Guthrie collection between Yankton and Austin. The original scenery collections were like trading in used cars and receiving credit for a new car purchase.

Both the original Wichita (1898) and Guthrie (1900) scenery collection were created by Sosman & Landis when they were subcontracted by M. C. Lilley.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 352 – How to Succeed in Business

Part 352: How to Succeed in Business

I want to start with an Albert Pike quote that was published in “Gen. Albert Pike’s Poems” (1900): “When I am dead, I wish my monument to be builded only in the hearts and memories of my brethren of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.”

Original oil painting of Grand Commander Albert Pike at the Scottish Rite in Yankton, South Dakota.

Not really following that direction, the Valley of Little Rock constructed the 1896 Albert Pike Cathedral, one of the finest Scottish Rite Cathedrals in the country at that time – with a stage. This is like a funeral that is really intended to comfort the living. The Albert Pike Cathedral was constructed for the living, not to honor Pike’s wishes; I doubt that the inclusion of a stage for degree productions was what Pike envisioned as any lasting monument. Let’s look at the individuals who were instrumental in designing the building.

Bestor G. Brown as Grand Master, Kansas (Topeka Daily Capital, 14 February 1904, page 6)

Remember that Bestor G. Brown was an investment banker who became a fraternal salesman. Brown supervised the inclusion of a stage for the Albert Pike Cathedral during 1896. He was heartily praised by Charles E. Rosenbaum (SGIG Arkansas). Later, Rosenbaum would head the committee who was “charged with the work of erecting the House of the Temple” (The Washington Post, 19 October 1915, page 5). In the big picture, Rosenbaum quickly became a big deal in the Scottish Rite. He would also be an Inspector General for Washington, D.C. during the opening ceremonies for the House of the Temple. This was in addition to being the SGIG for Arkansas.

Charles E. Rosenbaum, from Evening Star (Washington, D.C.) 13 May 1910, page 3.

So who was Rosenbaum? Rosenbaum was reported to be “an enterprising machinery supply man” from Arkansas (Arkansas Democrat, 24 May 1900, page 2). He was listed as a well-known mill-supply dealer in some papers and a designer in others; he had engineering skills, mechanical understanding, and charisma. The Arkansas Democrat reported that Mr. Chas. E. Rosenbaum was “generally recognized as one of the most skillful and artistic designers in the country” (Arkansas Democrat, 22 April 1899, page 6). Hmm.

One of Charles E. Rosebaum’s advertisements (Arkansas Democrat, 8 Oct 1900, page 2)
One of Charles S. Rosenbaum’s advertisement, Daily Arkansas Gazette (23 August 1899, page 3)
One of Charles E. Rosebaum’s advertisement from Daily Arkansas Gazette (7 Sept 1899, page 8)

So there is Rosenbaum who has an understanding of machines, maybe is an inventor, and some skills in the area of artistic design. This means that he can understand visual information, a good quality during planning and construction of a building. Brown could likely envision what a Scottish Rite theater looked like, as well as its potential appeal. Then there is Brown who not only understands banking and finance, but is also a successful salesman, Masonic ritualist, and fraternal supplier. Toss in Joseph S. Sosman with a well-respected reputation for running a quality scene painting business. Sosman’s asset is Chas. S King, genius stage mechanic who is in his employ. Presto! You have a recipe for success and a team to skillfully market degree productions and Masonic stages. The added bonus is that they are marketed by a nationally known brand – M.C. Lilley & Co., one of the largest and most-recognized fraternal suppliers at that time.

Undated newspaper clipping of Joseph S. Sosman. It was pasted in Thomas G. Moses’ scrapbook (Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas – Austin).

Freemasonry was big business when you consider the need to purchase rituals, officer jewels, costumes, paraphernalia, rugs, furniture, etc. The Scottish Rite required even more fraternal “stuff.” Instead of supplies and décor for three degrees, they had twenty-nine degrees (4th through 32nd), this had the potential for really big business. Any Scottish Rite would be a prime catch for a fraternal salesman, especially if they intended to dramatize the majority of their degrees. A decade later, most Scottish Rite orders would be 80-100 backdrops. Then think about the lights, rigging, costumes, props, etc. If the use of degree productions caught on with the other Masonic orders and new rites, business could absolutely explode – and it did.

Thomas G. Moses attributed the immediate success of degree productions in the west to the efforts of Rosenbaum, Brown and Sosman. After receiving a photograph of Rosenbaum in 1930, Moses wrote, “I don’t know how to thank you for the wonderful portrait you have been kind enough to send me. I will now have the 3 men that had all to do with the starting of the scenic decoration of the Scottish Rite Degree work, Rosenbaum, Brown & Sosman.” Sosman and Moses would have worked with Brown when they were all living in Chicago from 1892 to 1898.

 

So why was the Southern Jurisdiction such a big fat catch? Why hadn’t this happened in the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction (NMJ), in the major metropolitan areas in the northeast? I believe that it was simply because the movement wasn’t organized by the suppliers. It was driven by competition from within the Fraternity and not an outside market. Nothing was really planned, just installed as rival Supreme Councils competed for membership. He with the most members would win. Individual artists, often with Masonic ties, secured NMJ projects. With Pike gone, the Southern Jurisdiction was ripe for the picking. I like to think that it wasn’t a decision solely driven by money when allegiances formed, but the possibilities must have been tempting.

This was the start of a Scottish Rite Theatre building boom. There is a quick succession of ever-increasing Sosman & Landis scenery installations throughout the Southern Jurisdiction directly supervised by Brown: Little Rock (1896); Oakland, California (1896); Wichita (1898); additional scenery for Little Rock (1899), Guthrie (1900); Salina, Kansas (1901); Little Rock, again (1902); Portland, Oregon (1902), and the list goes on.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 351 – Bestor G. Brown, “Masonic Stage Carpenter”

Part 351: Bestor G. Brown, “Masonic Stage Carpenter”

Bestor G. Brown (1861-1917) was another key individual in the development of Masonic stages during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. He was an instrumental figure in the promotion of Scottish Rite degree productions across the country.

Bestor G. Brown. Topeka Daily Capital, 14 February 1904, page 6.

Brown was born at Blufftown, Indiana during 1861. The Browns soon moved to Kansas with his parents. His father, George S. Brown was a law partner of Judge John Guthrie. Bestor attended public schools and became a reporter for the Topeka Daily Commonwealth at the age of 16. Later he was in charge of the city department before leaving to study law, attending the University of Michigan. In 1884, he married Emma Kellam, who died only a few years later. In 1891, he advertised as an investment banker in the Topeka Daily Capital with offices in rooms 6 and 7 of the Topeka Bank Building. Brown’s ads listed him as “a dealer in high grade municipal, county, school and corporation bonds. Trust certificates bearing from 5 to 8 percent interest issued to investors. Prime Commercial Paper a Specialty. Correspondence Solicited.”

However, Brown soon turned to Masonic regalia and paraphernalia sales, suggesting that this was quite a lucrative field for an ambitious Mason. It is important to note that up until this point he had no experience with technical theatre or commercial stages. In 1892, he listed residence as Chicago, moving just in time to be part of the preparation for the Columbian Exposition. Brown was based in Chicago from 1892 to 1898; working as a fraternal traveling salesman. He returned to Topeka, Kansas in 1899 and later moved to Kansas City by 1904, becoming the western sales manager of M. C. Lilley Company.

Letter head for western representative, Bestor G. Brown, of the M. C. Lilley & Co.

Brown was reported to be “one of the most profound students of freemasonry and ritualists in the whole country” (The Kansas City Kansan, 11 July 1918, page 1). He was noted as “connected with practically every movement which Masons launched in Kansas for many years.” This was imperative if he was to sell fraternal regalia and paraphernalia.

Brown’s Masonic resumé included involvement in the Scottish Rite, York Rite, Midian Shrine, and the Order of the Eastern Star. He was also a member of the Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias and organized several chapters of the Psi Upsillon Fraternity. Masonic work included being Grand Master for the Grand Lodge of Kansas; Past High Priest of the Grand Chapter, Royal Arch Masons of Kansas; Past Master (and one of the first members initiated) of Siloam lodge, No. 225, A.F. and A.M.; Past Grand Master of the Grand Council; Past Grand Commander of Knights Templar in Kansas; General Grand Scribe of the General Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons; a Past Grand Sovereign of the Grand Imperial Council of the Red Cross of Constantine; and at the time of his death was an officer in the national Grand Council. Brown also had the distinction of having sat at the Royal Lodge in London when King Edward presided (Fort Scott Daily Tribune, 12 July 1917, page 2).

An article on Bestor G. Brown, crediting him as the “only Masonic stage carpenter” in the country (Portsmouth-Herald, 12 July 1903, page 3).

Brown was also a traveling salesman and western representative of M. C. Lilley and an “authority on the costumes for Masonic Bodies, having made a deep study of the subject in France and England.” In 1903, the Portsmouth Herald reported that Brown, who was the new Grand Master of Kansas, had been “unusually active” in lodge, chapter and council work since his admission to the Fraternity in 1884.

He was praised for his devotion of Masonry and the article reported, “Mr. Brown is called the only Masonic stage carpenter in the country” (Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 12 June 1903, page 3). Less than a decade later, the counterweight system installed in Scottish Rite theaters by M. C. Lilley subcontractors (Sosman & Landis) was referred to as “”Brown’s special system.” My research suggests that the stage machinery was actually developed by the stage mechanics at Sosman & Landis, not by Brown. This would be understandable as Brown came from a banking background and had no experience with theatre technology or supplies prior to 1892.

Brown was the salesman and possibly marketing technology developed by Charles S. King, a long-term Sosman & Landis studio employee who had completed 200 theatre installations by 1899. King started his career as a stage carpenter and stage machinist in 1859 and began working for Sosman & Landis in 1884. In 1903 newspaper articles note that Brown “created and developed the application of modern scenic properties to the dramatic presentation of all Masonic degrees and in this work is almost invariably consulted everywhere throughout the United States.” Again, I think that he was associated with the system because he was selling the product and not the designer.

Brown died in 1917 at the Battle Creek sanitorium after a relapse following an operation for kidney complications. Brown was 56 years old. He was survived by his daughter, Mrs. Dana L. Davis of Topeka. For the past few years of his life, Brown had been living in Kansas City while continuing to work in the western offices of M. C. Lilley Co.

The first year after Brown passed away, members of the Wichita Consistory organized an annual pilgrimage to Topeka, Kansas, to honor of his memory (The Kansas City Kansan, 11 July 1918, page 1). The paper reported that Brown was “one of the most scholarly and best loved Kansas Masons. All of the Scottish Rite bodies in the state were invited to join in the placing of a floral tribute on the grave of ‘their best loved brother.’”

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 350 – Charles E. Rosenbaum in Little Rock, Arkansas


Part 350: Charles E. Rosenbaum in Little Rock, Arkansas

Charles E. Rosenbaum picture in the 1899 Scottish Rite Reunion program.

One of the primary figures who promoted Scottish Rite degree productions in the Southern Jurisdiction was Charles E. Rosenbaum, Sovereign Grand Inspector General of Arkansas. At this same time that Rosenbaum was locating a building to house a Scottish Rite theatre, another Scottish Rite was building a theater in Oakland, California. In Arkansas, Rosenbaum instigated the purchase and conversion of a Hebrew Synagogue to include an elevated stage and proscenium for Scottish Rite degree productions. Rosenbaum’s inclusion of staged degree work and the immediate popularity from his endeavor throughout the western region helped secure his membership in the Supreme Council. Later, as the Sovereign Grand Inspector General of Arkansas, he was also appointed to the new ritual committee. A new movement was afoot in the Southern Jurisdiction and the theatrical interpretations of degrees were no longer actively suppressed as they once had been under Grand Commander Pike’s regime.

So lets look back at what was going on at this time. During December 1895, Rosenbaum posted a “Notice to Owners of Real Estate” in the Daily Arkansas Gazette (Little Rock, 10 Dec 1895, page 7). He noted hat “The Scottish Rite bodies, Free Masonry of this city desire to purchase a piece of property suitable for Masonic purposes and to that end solicit sealed proposals from those having property to offer, whether improved or unimproved.” Rosenbaum was the chair of the new building committee. By February 8, 1896, the Daily Arkansas Gazette reported that the Scottish Rite Masons had decided to purchase the “Jewish Temple property on Center Street” (page 3). It was purchased for $6,000 and a new Jewish Temple was planned to be erected for the sum of $20,000 at Fifth and Broadway Streets. By July 25, 1896 they named their new home the Albert Pike Cathedral (The Daily Gazette, page 5). The building was vacated during May of 1896. This converted synagogue in Little Rock incorporated so many of the features that would later become standard in the new construction of Scottish Rite theaters: drops, lights, proscenium opening, and set pieces. As in Chicago, the stage was slightly raised from the lodge floor by three symbolic steps. Similar to Chicago’s 1873 Egyptian Room format, Little Rock used a square proscenium opening – common to many commercial theaters of the time. In addition to a similar presentational format, Little Rock contracted the Chicago scenic studio firm of Sosman & Landis to supply the stage scenery, with Thomas G. Moses supervising the painting.

The construction of Little Rock’s stage space was so well received that additional scenery and theatrical elements were added only two years later. 1898 was also the same year that Wichita, Kansas, purchased a Scottish Rite scenery collection for their new stage. Little Rock’s Fall Reunion program of 1898 praised the new scenery acquisitions, stating that the members “will enjoy to a much greater extent the exemplification of the various degrees, assisted so materially by additional scenic and electrical effects, on which neither labor or expense have been spared, to the end that it might be the most perfect to produce” (“Fall Reunion Program” Albert Pike Scottish Rite Cathedral, 1898).

In 1899, the Guthrie Daily Leader covered the Spring Reunion in the new Masonic home in Guthrie from May 29-31. Rosenbaum was one of the many prominent Masons who were visiting from all parts of the country to see their new stage (21 May 1900, page 8). The paper reported, “Charles E. Rosenbaum, thirty-third degree, of Little Rock, will exemplify the work in the thirty-second degree. He is known throughout the United States for his proficiency in exemplifying this degree. The building of the temple is credited to Harper S. Cunningham, a thirty-third degree Mason, and now Sovereign Grand Inspector General in Oklahoma. Previously he had been a deputy of the supreme council for Oklahoma since the opening of the country.” At the time, there were 104 Scottish Rite Masons in Oklahoma with a new class of 100 participating in the Spring Reunion.

Charles E. Rosenbaum pictured with article about corner-laying ceremony for the new Albert Pike Cathedral in 1901.

A second scenery installation was delivered to Little Rock in 1902 for a new stage in and this time, the building was featured in the first year of “New Age Magazine” (later the publication became “Scottish Rite Journal”). In the article, Rosenbaum proudly claimed, “…the stage equipment in Little Rock is the most perfect in America – not only for Masonic purposes, for which it is used exclusively, but from any other point of view…nowhere else in America, with the possible exception of one theatre in New York, and one in Chicago, is it possible to produce either the scene or electric effects that can be produced on this stage.” Well, maybe in the Masonic world, but not in the commercial world. Most new theaters that opened across the country made similar statements to draw in crowds.

Regarding the successful stage effects for the 1902 Little Rock Scottish Rite, Charles E. Rosenbaum credited fellow Mason and Masonic supply representative Bestor G. Brown. Brown was credited with creating many of the superb scenic effects, including “a specially designed electrical switch board that facilitated the impressive illusions.” That would be similar to the electric board that was on display with Western Electric at the Columbian Exposition in 1893; the one that helped with the scenic electric theater’s production of “A Day in the Alps.” Brown will also later be credited with the “special” counterweight rigging system for Scottish Rite theaters. Again, it is doubtful that Brown was solely responsible for the innovation of electrical lighting and counterweight rigging systems in the big picture. In the smaller context of fraternal theater, he must have been an absolute god as he knew how to create theatre magic.

To be continued…