Thomas G. Moses – Page 33

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar: Arriving in Louisville, March 19, 2019

I left Genoa, Illinois, at 5:45 AM on Tuesday, March 19. My goal was to arrive at the Louisville Scottish Rite between noon and 1PM. The drive was pretty uneventful, but there were many places that I wished I had stopped along the way; there is just never enough time. The first was the exit that would have brought me to Thomas G. Moses’ hometown of Sterling, Illinois. The second was the Crump Theatre in Columbus, Indiana. I could not take the time to stop, as I knew that my time was really limited at the Louisville Scottish Rite. My plan was to evaluate the entire collection on Wednesday. Today was simply scoping out the collection, rigging and facility with Rick. Also, this was the only day Rick could visit since the “New World Rigging Symposium” would prevent him from visiting Wednesday.

I contacted my Scottish Rite host Randolph. The intent was to visit for two hours while they were still open. Randolph had scheduled one of the Masonic stagehands to be there – Jim. Jim had worked the stage for many years and was an absolute wealth of information at 75 years old. Fortunately for me, Jim gave me their stage book that provided a little guidance in terms of inventory and line order. This is an unusual gesture, as I often have to prove how much I know before that stage book is passed along.

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system

My visit on Tuesday was primarily about the rigging and Rick’s findings. Rick had a wonderful opportunity to fully explain the significance of this double purchase system to the stewards of this stage. He described that the 1930 system, original to the building, predated the Clancy patent several years later. As interested as I was in the unique aspects of the system I was more anxious to see a few scenes while he was in the flies. They brought in the first line and I began to catalogue information about this 4^th degree interior setting.

My notes were placed within the historical context of the Louisville Scottish Rite that I have explored during the previous week. It was apparent that the majority of the scenery dated from 1910. Toomey & Volland business records noted two scenery deliveries – 1910 and 1951. The drops depicted standard designs and painting techniques characteristic of the studio.

Unfortunately, much of the scenery was restored at one point, with methods that may not be advantageous for the collection’s future. I understand the choices of those who repaired the scene, but wonder how these will age. Most scenes were backed with a type of gauze that appeared plastic, although it may have been the adhesive. The edges of cut scenes were backed with flexible foam core; this I had encountered in Cheyenne. For a new scene, ephemeral in nature, it is a brilliant idea. For historic scenery, I have to wonder how the foam will interact with the fragile fabric in the long run. The painted surface had also been sealed, resulting in a slight sheen. I have no idea what was used for this, as it had a plastic feel; almost reminding me of a product that I used on interactive exhibits for museum projects – Aquaplastic.

Finally, the netting was replaced with a plastic ½” square version; hot melt glued to the back. As Alessia Carpoca and I looked at this alteration near the end of the day, she asked the same question that has gone through my mind multiple times when seeing hot melt glued netting: “How could anyone be so stupid?” It is the idea that the drops of hot glue will never come of the back without damaging the fabric. The hot glue embeds itself in the weave and is permanently fixed. Even steam and heat only partially removed this product, as I have tried in the past. The process completely destroys the painted surface during its removal.

Meanwhile, Rick was occupied doing another good deed (as usual); helping balance some line sets to make them easier to move. He also took the time to thoroughly explain how the system worked and all of the various components. As previously mentioned, the Scottish Rite Reunion was scheduled to start in four days and some of the lines were difficult to pull.

For the most part, we try to leave any stage better than we found it, even if this means simply explaining a system and scenery for future clarity. In Scottish Rite theaters, the Masonic stagehands are often unfamiliar with the history of both. It is not unusual to find something amiss in these systems that require a simple tweak. After all, the systems have often not been maintained since their installation.

After Rick was done with his talk and the weight adjustment, we headed up to the grid. This was one of the easiest ascents ever to access the space above the stage.

Our journey to the grid at the Louisville Scottish Rite

The Louisville Scottish Rite counterweight system above the stage

We went up steps and followed boards above the auditorium space. I kept an eye out for trash, as treasures were often left in these attic spaces. Sure enough, there was a Mazda Edison box! We balanced our way to a small door, with Jim taking quick grip on me to make sure I would not fall. My sense of mortality has exponentially increased over the years, so I don’t wander to close to the edges anymore. However, I wasn’t going to miss an opportunity accompanying Rick and hearing his observations. It is always fun to be on site with Rick, as he so thoroughly explains what I am looking at and the nuances of each system. It is like the rigging class that does not end.

We left the Scottish Rite late afternoon, and I checked into the Hardy House (my Airbnb for the conference). Just about the time I was settling in and deciding to open a can of soup, I received a text from Randolph. He notified me that the Louisville Scottish Rite librarian and archivist would be contacting me soon, offering me the opportunity to visit the Scottish Rite library that evening. Regardless of my fatigue, this was not an opportunity that I would miss. So within the hour, I was waiting outside for my ride to head back to the Louisville Scottish Rite. It was certainly worth it as I spent the next few hours perusing books and chatting with Richard.

Like many, the library was a fraction of what it had once held. Books were missing and the contents somewhat sparse. However, there were certainly some gems left; absolutely priceless publications that would contribute to my ongoing research about visual sources used by scenic studios to produce Scottish Rite scenery. My biggest surprise was a Cerneau book with many recognizable compositions that were later incorporated into the Scottish Rite scenic designs.

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Circus World Museum, March 18, 2019

After stopping by the Al Ringling Theater and Baraboo Lodge No. 34, I drove over to the Circus World Museum on Monday, March 18. My intention was to briefly meet with the curator and share my information pertaining to the grand circus spectacles produced by Sosman & Landis from 1905 to 1915.

The gal behind the desk at the museum told me to see the curator Pete. He was currently working in their library and archives across the river on an upcoming exhibit. This building was a very small and unassuming place, yet the walls were lined with posters and circus memorabilia. We chatted for quite a while, with Pete deciding that a copy of my book would be beneficial his patrons as it placed the Ringling spectacles with in a larger context and identified a major theatrical supplier to Al Ringling. He then suggested that I venture back over to the museum to look at a few pieces from the grand spectacle “Cinderella” in the museum. He called over to make sure that I could examine the setting without any difficulty and I realized that more time should have been set aside for my Baraboo side trip.

Circus World Museum with backing from the Cinderella grand circus spectacle in the background.

I whizzed through the museum and easily spotted the scenery. It was awe-inspiring to look at the painting. It depicted all of the standard trademarks for a Sosman & Landis manufacture. I especially appreciated the foil paper-backed strips to accentuate the gold capitals. What was most interesting was the heavy-duty canvas, flat seams, and basic construction that mirrored the floor cloths produced by the company. Drop construction is another area where I am slowly tucking away information.

From 1905 until 1915, Thomas G. Moses completed several designs for grand circus spectacles. The first mention of his designing one of Al Ringling’s spectacles was in 1905. Fast forward to 1912 when Moses mentioned another visit to Baraboo, Wisconsin, during the Ringling Brothers’ off-season. Moses wrote, “I went to Baraboo in the meantime to see Ringling Brothers and close for another big spectacle. Mr. Al Ringling took me through the winter quarters of the animals which was also very interesting. Feeding time for the lions, tigers and all the cat family was a noisy time. Watching the training for the elephants was also very interesting. The immense chain and derricks they have to use to teach the elephants to stand on their heads was strong enough to lift a battleship. A great deal of care is given to all the animals, much more than is given to the men that attend the animals. The Ringlings have their own car shop and paint shops, and everything is taken care of here except scenery and wardrobe. They are very busy getting ready for the next season, making contracts for all supplies at every town they visit, and they certainly have some system.”

In spring of 1912, Moses caught up with the circus in his hometown of Sterling, Illinois, as he needed to collect the final payment for the season’s production. He attended the show and wrote, “Went to Sterling to catch Ringling to collect $1,200.00. As went to the tent to find Al Ringling, I discovered everyone watching a fire – a stable at least four blocks away. A spark was blown towards the tent, the top of which is prepared with parafine to make it water-proof. It soon ignited from the sparks and in less than thirty minutes the big tent was destroyed. The rest of the tents were saved. It was mighty fortunate there were no people in the tent. Some of the animals in another tent started some noise when the smelled the smoke, but they were soon quieted. I sneaked away without making myself known. There was no money for me, that I guessed.”

Moses eventually collected the payment during 1912, and by the end of the year wrote, “Another trip to Baraboo to see the Ringling’s about next year’s show, which I secured.” They were contracted to provide the scenery for another production in 1913. Al Ringling liked the work produced at Sosman & Landis studio and its last president Thomas G. Moses. Winter was the time to plan.

Both equipment and animals were cared for from November until April of each year – their off-season. Baraboo became home to the exotic and their caretakers. In 1913, 117 Ringling Brothers’ Circus employees worked in Baraboo during the winter months. The staff included the following positions: Caring for work horses (23), caring for show horses (7), caring for menagerie animals (8), elephant caretakers (10), blacksmiths (5), railcar repair (16), paint shop (16), harness shop )3), wagon and repair shop (9), wardrobe (5), hotel (12), watchmen (2), and office (1). As the circus employed approximately 1200 people during the season, where did the remainder of employees winter? Some acts sought contracts in warmer climates, returning to Wisconsin in April for the new tour. Some workmen found work in nearby lumber camps and spent the winter in less than ideal conditions. A few took the winter months as an opportunity for rest and relaxation

It was at the winter quarters that the Ringling brothers planned for their upcoming season. Shows were chosen, costumes assembled and scenery designed for elaborate spectacles. Winter was a time for preparation, training and hard labor. There was time available to plan and rehearse the animals for another season. A team of writers wrote news stories for upcoming shoes that would tour the country. Circus wagons were repaired and repainted. Animals were exercised both indoors and outdoors. Everyone had a specific project to accomplish all year long.

Baraboo remained the winter quarters for the Ringling Brothers’ circus from 1886 to 1918. At that time the circus moved to a new location in Connecticut; it had been the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows since 1907 and began to recoup at the old Barnum & Bailey winter quarters.

It was not until 1954 that John M. Kelly, a personal attorney for the Ringlings, incorporated the Circus World Museum as a historical and educational facility. He had worked for the Ringlings for more than three decades. The Circus Museum opened to the public July 1, 1959. The website reports that “The museum’s collection of circus artifacts is perhaps the largest in the world. It includes over 210 original wagons and vehicles once used by American, English and Irish circuses. It houses an exceptional collection of circus ads and posters. Over 9,500 multi-colored circus posters range in size from half-sheets to an 80-sheet Buffalo Bill Wild West poster which measures 9’ high and 70’ long. Thousands of journals, manuscripts and business records are available as well as original fine art oil paintings, hand bills, heralds, programs, artifacts of circus performers and a collection of rare photographs and negatives.” I have yet to spend a significant amount of time in their archives. Here is the link to their website: http://www.circusworldbaraboo.org/

To be continued…

Travels of a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Baraboo, Wisconsin, March 18, 2019

There is always the dilemma of whether I should drive or fly to USITT. If I fly, I miss many historic theaters that I could stop at along the way. However, that takes time, time that I often don’t have to spare. Two things prompted my driving to Louisville this year – Baraboo and Brian. In Baraboo, it was the Al Ringling Theatre (1915) and the Circus World museum. In 1905, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “Went to Baraboo to see Ringling Bros. Hunt went with me. I don’t know why, as I had to do all the talking and make the sketching for ‘The Field of the Cloth of Gold.’ We got the contract for $3,500.00.” David Hunt was in charge of New York Studios, the eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis.

Almost a year ago, I covered in detail Thomas G. Moses’ work for Al Ringling. Moses designed and supervised the painting of six grand circus spectacles. These were events for the big top and attached to the opening parade of the circus. These huge pageants that were solely accompanied by movement and music. The Ringling Brothers found favor with Moses during the first two decades of the 20^th century, so it was Sosman & Landis who would delivered the scenery to Al’s theatre in 1915.

My late luncheon appointment with Brian was in Elgin, Illinois, at 1:45PM and I had left Minneapolis at 5:45AM; so I had a little time to spare. Fortunately the driving went well and I found myself pulling into Baraboo with a little more than 90 minutes to document what I could. I was a woman on a mission. Unfortunately the Theatre is closed on Mondays, so I was only able to see the outside. Kicking myself, as I could have called ahead, I venture to the second of three stops in Baraboo. Here is a recap on Al Ringling’s Theatre. Here is a little information about the theatre.

In 1915, Moses wrote, “The new theatre we did at Baraboo for Al Ringling was a good contract at $2,600.00. I went up to open and found a beautiful theatre, very unique in design, fifty years ahead of the town. Poor Al Ringling died soon after this.”

The Janesville Gazette reported, “Sosman & Landis company of Chicago did the scenic painting in this new theatre” (20 Nov. 1915, page 20). On April 7 of that same year, Joseph S. Sosman passed away at the age of 70, leaving a widow and two sons (Arthur and Fred). Thomas Moses became the president of Sosman & Landis, with Arthur Sosman as vice-president. The Ringling Theatre was one of Moses’ flagship projects as the new studio president.

Drop curtain by Sosman & Landis studio for Al Ringling’s Theatre

The Ringling Theatre opened its doors in November 1915 and has been operating continuously ever since. Al Ringling hired the architectural firm of Rapp and Rapp to design a theater based on the Orpheum Theatre built in Champaign, Illinois in 1914. The Janesville Daily Gazette reported, “Theatrical men, scenic painters, canvas makers and many prominent citizens from Chicago and other towns, all of whom were bound for Baraboo to do honor to a man who had the courage to build in that city one of the finest, if not the finest, playhouse in America, Mr. Al Ringling. (20 Nov. 1915, page 20). There were 844 seats, with seventeen boxes, each containing six seats. The stage was 33’-6” deep, 60’ wide and 46’ high. The massive fire curtain of asbestos measured 24’ high by 40’ wide, weighing 750 pounds.

As my hope to see the front curtain was a bust, I decided to visit the local Masonic Lodge, Baraboo No. 34. I knew it wouldn’t be the original building, but want to see the Ringling Brothers’ Masonic aprons. Score! Three men were working on the building, as it had suffered some water damage. All of the Ringling brothers and their father were Masons in Baraboo and the history is quite interesting. That is the tale for tomorrow.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 700 – The Topeka Scottish Rite, 1906

Part 700: The Topeka Scottish Rite, 1906

I briefly return to the Topeka Scottish Rite. In 1906, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “The New Year found me at work on some new work for Topeka, Masonic Hall. Very nice work.”

One of the stage settings delivered tot he Topeka Scottish Rite by Sosman & Landis

The “Topeka Daily Capital” reported, “The Scottish Rite bodies of Topeka purchased the building now occupied by the local Masonic bodies three years ago, and they have spent over $20,000 in the last four months in furnishing a lodge room that will compare favorably with any in the United States. A new stage thirty-five feet in depth has been built, and it is said to have more scenery than any other in the country. There are 110 drops, over one hundred of which are the property of, and will be used by, the Scottish Rite in conferring their degrees, which are peculiarly adapted to stage work. The electrical effects that can be produced are almost without number, and are controlled by a marble switch-board eight feet long.” (21 Feb. 1906, page 5).

Sosman & Landis delivered the scenery to the Masonic building located on Jackson Street in Topeka, Kansas. $15,000 worth of scenery had been sold to the Valley of Topeka, allowing candidates to be conferred in full form during the spring reunion of 1906 (The Topeka Daily, 23 April 1906, page 2). For the event, there were 200 candidates, the largest class ever assembled in the state. The reunion took place over the course of three days (The Topeka Daily, 23 April 1906, page 7). Two of the candidates were Dr. F. O. Hetrick and A. Haggart from Ottawa, Kansas. Their local newspaper, “The Evening Herald” reported that the two men “went to Topeka this morning to attend the twenty-sixth semi-annual reunion of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite Bodies of the Orient of Kansas, Valley of Topeka. Both gentlemen are going to take degree work” (24 April 1906, page 3). This notice is not unusual, and often newspapers would list all of the candidates in a Scottish Rite class. Articles would also describe which degrees were conferred and communicated; conferred often meant that the degree was theatrically staged. Although Freemasonry might be considered a “secret” society, the identity of incoming members was often published in the local newspaper. It says a lot about the size and prominence of the organization at the time. Scottish Rite membership was on the rise and it meant something to be associated with the Fraternity.

The Topeka Scottish Rite stage pictured in the “Topeka Daily”, 21 Feb, 1906, page 5

The reunion in Topeka either ran like a well-oiled machine, or was one chaotic mess. With 100 drops and 17 of the 29 degrees staged, a lot occurred over the course of three action-packed days in 1906. The success of the region was evident as an addition was immediately planned. During November of 1906, the Topeka Scottish Rite again broke ground again for a $100,000 addition to the building. The second floor that contained the stage and auditorium remained unaltered, but the Fraternity needed more space if the membership continued to increase at the same rapid rate

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 686 – Meanwhile, in the Northern Jurisdiction

Part 686: Meanwhile, in the Northern Jurisdiction

I am in the midst of examining the progression of Scottish Rite stage construction in the Southern Jurisdiction, before I return to the life and times of Thomas G. Moses in 1909. 1908 to 1910 is when Sosman & Landis reach their peak production period of fraternal theater production and Brown’s special system. There is little documented evidence of degree productions in the Southern Jurisdiction before 1896, with the earliest stages being constructed in Little Rock, Arkansas, and Oakland, California, much flew under the official radar.

The major aspect to the evolution of theatrically interpreted degree work in the Southern Jurisdiction is a systematic marketing plan by a relatively small number of individuals that included Bestor G. Brown as the spokesman for the movement. Brown created demand for a particular product manufactured by Sosman & Landis studio. The development of Brown’s special system directly increased the amount of painted scenery that was able to be installed in a Scottish Rite theaters. Although Sosman & Landis scenic artists and stage carpenter David Austin Strong (1830-1911) was credited by Thomas G. Moses (1856-1934) as the “Daddy” of Masonic design, the theatrical staging of degree work had long been occurring in the Northern Jurisdiction for decades before the Southern Jurisdiction.

Before moving forward with the expansion of Scottish Rite stages throughout the Southern Jurisdiction, from 1896 onward, here’s a brief recap of what was already occurring in the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction (NMJ) of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Keep in mind that the NMJ is located east of the Mississippi and north of the Ohio River. At the time the geographical demarcations were established, the NMJ included many of the United States’ major metropolitan areas, including Boston, and Philadelphia. These were vibrant theatrical hubs during the mid-nineteenth century when the NMJ began staging portions of their degree work, not to mention the Masonic Opera Houses that were constructed during the time.

The Baldwin Building used by the Indianapolis Scottish Rite in 1873

The Indianapolis Scottish Rite remodeled a pork slaughterhouse to include two stages for degree work in 1882.

In the 1860s the Indianapolis Scottish Rite Bodies used movable scenery and a small stage in their 1863 space of the Yohn Building, before moving to the Baldwin Building in 1873. Increasingly elaborate stage productions of degrees continued until 1882 when the Indianapolis Scottish Rite purchased and remodeled an old pork slaughterhouse, installing two stages for degree work. Originally a five-story brick building, the back half was raised an additional story to accommodate a theatrical fly system. Theatre spaces occupied both the fourth and fifth floors and were of similar size, each including galleries on three sides with 450-seat capacities. The fourth-floor and fifth-floor auditoriums measured approximately forty by eighty feet. The fourth-floor auditorium included a twenty-eight foot proscenium opening that was primarily used for scenic effects in connection with the conferring of degrees. The fifth-floor proscenium stage opening was twenty by thirty feet and included a forty-five-foot high fly loft.

Despite the popularity of Scottish Rite stages, the Southern Jurisdiction did not follow suit because of Grand Commander Pike. The same year that the Indianapolis Scottish Rite building was completed, Grand Pike addressed the dissimilarity of degree work in each jurisdiction in his 1882 Allocution, stating, “The Rite in this jurisdiction is a Rite of Instruction, and not of scenic pomp and stage-show. We do not indulge in melodrama or pantomime. It is the firm conviction of hundreds of our zealous workers that our books are well worth being studied, and that the Rite, as developed in our Degrees, is destined by God to be in our future one of the chief benefactors of humanity…I can not conceive of a more useless occupation than the arranging and performing of degrees, neither the effect nor the purpose of which is to make men wiser or better, but which are acted as melodramas, to gratify an æsthetic taste and please the imagination, like the pageantry of cardinals and orioles. It is not Masonry.”

The 1886 Cincinnati Scottish Rite stage with scenery painted by E. T. Harvey.

As in Indianapolis, Cincinnati also constructed a series of early stages before building a full Scottish Rite cathedral. Cincinnati’s first Scottish Rite cathedral was destroyed by fire during 1884. The New Scottish Rite Cathedral was described in the Masonic Column of Cincinnati’s Commercial Gazette on July 5, 1885. The article boasted, “When fully completed the Cathedral will constitute the most complete and elegantly fitted building devoted to any one branch of Masonry in the World.” It was competed by 1886 at a cost of $82,500. (Democratic and Chronicle, 16 May 1886, page 2). The Cincinnati Scottish Rite auditorium contained a three-tiered balcony and a thirty-two-foot proscenium opening. The entire scenic installation for their newly constructed Scottish Rite building was credited to E. T. Harvey. His scenery included a tomb, interior palace, palatial chamber, landscape, fiery underworld, ascension of Christ, and a cathedral interior to name a few. As an itinerant artist, Harvey worked at a variety of theatres throughout the region, including Heuck’s New Opera House where the Scottish Rite scenery had been painted. E. T. Harvey would create 18 new sets of scenery for the Cleveland Scottish Rite in 1901 too after they suffered the loss of a previous building to fire (Cincinnati Enquirer, 31, Oct 1901, page 3). Harvey (1843-1918) was an Englishman who immigrated to America in 1860 and worked extensively as a scenic artist in the east. He also worked at the Grand Opera in Cincinnati for 25 years. Harvey was a member of the Scottish Rite and Shrine, as many of the first scenic artists to create Masonic scenery,

Painted scene by E. T. Harvey for the Cincinnati Scottish Rite.

In 1886, the same year that the second Cincinnati Scottish Rite Cathedral was completed, another one was finished in Columbus, Ohio. The “Fort Wayne Daily Gazette” included an article “Gorgeous Quarters. The Magnificent Scottish Rite Cathedral at Columbus, Ohio” (5 Dec. 1886, page 8). The Third Street Universalist church was purchased and remodeled for $12,000. The renovation included a stage and property room. At the time, the newspapers proclaimed the building to be “one of the most complete in the country.” Indianapolis, Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati were only a few examples of a wave sweeping through the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction a full decade before the first small Scottish Rite stages appeared in Little Rock and Oakland.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 680 – The Scottish Rite in Fargo, North Dakota, 1900

The Scottish Rite in Fargo, North Dakota, 1900

The past few posts examined early Scottish Rite contracts between the Guthrie Scottish Rite and E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing company between 1899 and 1900. Another Scottish Rite theater project occurred during this same time in Fargo, North Dakota. It also included a scenery collection manufactured by Sosman & Landis.

The first steps toward a new Masonic building in Fargo began during 1894. Land was not purchased until February 1898, with the contract for work being finalized during May 1899. On June 7, 1899, the cornerstone was laid for the Masonic Temple at 501 First Avenue North in Fargo. It would be the home to several Masonic orders in Fargo. The building was first occupied on June 6, 1900, but not fully completed. This building would include a Scottish Rite theater, lodge rooms, banquet hall, kitchen, billiard room, armory, reception room and offices. In 1914, an addition was made on the west side of the building. A library, museum, gymnasium, and swimming pool were included in the work. All told, this massive complex included 55,155 square feet of total floor space. The building would be home to the Scottish Rite until 1968 when it was razed as part of an urban renewal plan. In 1968, the Masonic Temple was purchased by the Fargo Parking Authority with the intent to construct a parking lot. Demolition began on June 19, 1968.

The Scottish Rite auditorium in the Fargo Masonic Temple pictured in a 1903 Reunion program

The Scottish Rite stage in the Fargo Masonic Temple pictured in a 1903 Reunion program

Scene created by Sosman & Landis for the Fargo Scottish Rite stage

The turn of the twentieth century is a period at Sosman & Landis produced some absolutely stunning work. The nineteenth-century aesthetic still dominated Scottish Rite scenery, as scenic artist and stage carpenter David A. Strong (1830-1911) was still actively involved with its production. Thomas G. Moses was on his way out the studio door again; this time to start a new business with Will Hamilton, establishing Moses & Hamilton in NYC during 1900. Back in Chicago, Strong still reigned as the “Daddy of Masonic Design” and was still very active as a scenic artist at the Sosman & Landis studio. My research suggests that Strong was very involved in the production of scenery for Little Rock (1896, 1899, 1901), Oakland (1896), Wichita (1898), Guthrie (1900), and Fargo (1900). After 1900, his contributions to Scottish Rite scenery begin to diminish.

Fellow scenic artists referred to Strong as “Old Trusty” and a member of the Dusseldorf School. Of Strong, Moses wrote, “His color was deep and rich and his drawings very correct.” In “Paint Mimic Scenes, Men Who Have Found Fame in the Wing and Drop Curtains” Strong was included as a well-respected scenic artist with the article reporting, “David Strong, “Old Trusty,” still at work in this city, is the only survivor of the good old Dusseldorf school. Everything that comes from his facile brush – and he could walk over miles of canvas of his own painting – has the quality of opaqueness peculiar to his school and seldom found nowadays. (“Chicago Sunday Tribune” article, Dec, 18, 1892, page 41). It is the comment “seldom found nowadays” that rings true. Even in 1892, the artistry of Strong’s generation was diminishing. The last vestiges of this art form are likely still hanging in a handful of Scottish Rite stages across the country.

Sosman & Landis scenery produced for Little Rock, Wichita, Fargo and Guthrie, have a unique aesthetic and compositional approach to the painting. Like a person’s signature, it is easy to identify that a particular scenic artist worked for all four collections. Artworks associated with the Dusseldorf school included an active middle ground, with the primary not taking place in the fore ground. The 1892 “Chicago Tribune” article comment about the “quality of opaqueness” to Strong’s work; this was in direct contrast to the English practice of glazing (Chicago Tribune, Dec. 18, 1892). The opaque application of solid color for Strong also meant that a subject could be worked up from dark to light, the approach of the slapdash tradition. The use of glazes often meant that the composition was painted up in the reverse, from light to dark. Each was a successful method, yet supported differing approaches to color mixing and paint application. That being said, most audiences would be unable to identify the differing techniques or aesthetic nuances as they both read well from a distance.

Sosman & Landis setting for the Scottish Rite stage in Fargo, North Dakota.

Sosman & Landis setting for the Scottish Rite stage in Guthrie, Oklahoma.

A second scenic artist also contributed scenery to the Little Rock, and Wichita collections during this time, approaching the subject matter in the English tradition of glazing. However, this style is only apparent in a few settings, such as the Egyptian scenes and Royal Chamber. Overall, the majority of the scenery for Scottish Rite collections during the late nineteenth century at Sosman & Landis has in identical feel and aesthetic approach to the subject matter. My research suggests that it was Strong who was the main artist; he would have been in his mid to late sixties at the time. Few pieces beyond the 1904 Sosman & Landis scenery installation for the Duluth Scottish Rite remain and are, what I believe to be, indicative of Strong’s work. The floral wreaths for the 1909 setting of Darius’ Festival Palace created for the Scottish Rite in Winona, Minnesota, was another example. However, by 1909, Strong was 79 years old, and likely unable to contribute as much painting to each Scottish Rite project. Keep in mind that Storng was one of the artists for the original production at the “The Black Crook” at Niblo’s Garden in 1866. “The Black Crook” is considered by many to be America’s first musical.

For more posts about Strong, see past installments #127, 215, 248, and 382.

Sosman & Landis setting for the Scottish Rite stage in Austin, Texas, using glazing techniques.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 671 – Charles E. Rosenbaum, Bestor G. Brown and Joseph S. Sosman

Part 671: Charles E. Rosenbaum, Bestor G. Brown and Joseph S. Sosman

I have examined Bestor G. Brown and Brown’s special system over the course of several posts, placing both within the context of Midwestern stage carpenters and scenic artists.

Brown’s special system was manufactured by Sosman & Landis and marketed by Bestor G. Brown, western sales representative of M. C. Lilley & Co. Documented examples of Brown’s special system include Little Rock, Arkansas, Guthrie, Oklahoma , Duluth, Minnesota, Wichita, Kansas, Memphis, Winona, Minnesota (1909, recently demolished), Tennessee, Cheyenne, Wyoming, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Portland, Maine, Grand Forks, North Dakota, Asheville, North Carolina, and Tucson, Arizona.

Thomas G. Moses credited with origin of Masonic designs to David A. Strong. In 1911 after Strong’s unexpected death, Moses wrote, “Strong was the ‘daddy’ of all Masonic designs and he was a 32^nd Degree man.” We know that Strong was both a scenic artist and stage carpenter, instrumental in some of the earliest Scottish Rite scenery for the Oriental Consistory of Chicago.

Moses mentioned three other men in his memoirs who he credited with “the starting of the scenic decoration of real Scottish Rite degree work”– Joseph S. Sosman, Bestor G. Brown and Charles E. Rosenbaum.

In 1930, he Moses wrote letters Frank M. Jefferson at the Albert Pike Memorial during April 1930. In the last, he mentions the three men:

“April 20, 1930

My Dear Brother Frank,

I have tried for sometime to write you, to thank you for sending the wire that announced the death of one of my best friends. A man that I had all of the Brotherly Love for that was possible to give.

While at times, he would go for me rough-shod for some neglect of mine, but at the same time would go out of his way to help me in more ways than one, he gave me more sound judgment on my work than I have had from anyone outside of Bestor Brown – and I have put it to useful work. I am going to ask a favor. I want a photograph of Mr. Rosenbaum to place with the one I have of Bestor Brown, my two advisors in my chosen vocation.

Thanking you in advance and with best regards to all.

Sincerely and fraternally yours,

Thos. G. Moses”

_____

“April 29, 1930

My Dear Jefferson,

Yours of the 25^th received. I will visit Little Rock, every time I am in your vicinity, as I count on a warm welcome by my friends.

You mention having enclosed a photo of C. E. Look about your desk and you will find that you did not include it. I shall certainly be pleased to receive it.

I wish you would remember me to the Harris boys and father, Bill Leipzig (I have forgotten how to spell his name) also to Gene Smith and others.

Thanking you again for the photo which you will send.

I am sincerely yours,

Thos. G. Moses”

_____

“April 30, 1930

My dear Frank,

The photo has arrived. I had supposed it was one you intended to include with your letter. I don’t know how to thank you enough for this wonderful portrait you have been kind enough to send me. I will now have the 3 men that had all to do with the starting of the Scenic decoration of real Scottish Rite Degree work: Rosenbaum, Brown and Sosman. Many – many – thanks for the photo.

I am sincerely yours,

Thos. G. Moses”

_____

Charles E. Rosenbaum was president of the C. E. Rosenbaum Machinery Company in Little Rock, Arkansas. Like Brown, he held many offices in the Fraternity, including S.G.I.G. of Arkansas and the Lieutenant Grand Commander of the Supreme Council. Tomorrow, I will look at the remarkable life of Rosenbaum, a man who insisted one should never lose sight of the fact that a business is built on honor and should be maintained in the same manner.

C. E. Rosenbaum Machinery Co. advertisement from the “Daily Arkansas Gazette,” 3 June 1904, page 3

C. E. Rosenbaum Machinery Co. advertisement in the “Arkansas Democrat,” Rosenbaum 13 Sept 1916, page 2

C. E. Rosenbaum advertisement from the “Arkansas Democrat,” Rosenbaum 25 Sept 1914, page 10

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 670 – A Melting Pot of Ingenuity

Part 670: A Melting Pot of Ingenuity

There are four things to consider when examining the development of Brown’s Special System – the Chicago Auditorium, the Beckwith Memorial Auditorium, the scenic studio of Albert, Grover & Burridge, and Sosman & Landis. There is no linear progression of events and Chicago is a melting pot of ingenuity.

I’ll start with what Rick Boychuk wrote in “Nobody Looks Up: The History of the Counterweight Rigging System,1500-1925.” Boychuk contends that Chicago Auditorium of 1889 is a game changer in the future of American counterweight rigging. Of the endeavor, he writes, “The first counterweight rigging system in American was state-of-the-art technology when it was installed in 1889 in the Auditorium Building in Chicago – commonly referred to as the Chicago Auditorium” (page 167). Boychuk explains how Ferdinand Peck, the visionary for the Chicago auditorium, traveled to Europe to examine opera houses, later joined by architect Dankmar Adler (Adler & Sullivan) and Chicago stage carpenter John Bairstow. Boychuk states, “Chicago borrowed the sheave design and configuration from Budapest and the balance of the counterweight system from Vienna” (page 172). Read his book.

Things to think about as we contemplate the evolution of Brown’s special system: the Chicago Auditorium stage carpenter, Bairstow, was one of the charter members who founded Chicago’s Theatrical Mechanics Association. In fact, he was the organization’s first president in Chicago. Bairstow was a member of TMA Chicago Lodge No. 4. David Austin Strong was also a Member of Chicago Lodge. No. 4. At the time they were both members in 1891, Strong was an employee of Sosman & Landis, and was also credited as being the “Daddy of Masonic Design.”

David Austin Strong, scenic artist and stage mechanic

This title was given to him by Thomas Gibbs Moses in his 1931 memoirs; Moses became the president of Sosman & Landis in 1915. Before Chicago, Strong enjoyed a successful career in New York as both a scenic artist and stage carpenter. Strong even provided one of the scenes for the 1866 production of “The Black Crook” at Niblo’s Garden Theatre. At this same time, the Theatrical Mechanics Association was founded in New York (1866). During the 1870s Strong relocated to Chicago, the hub of theatrical construction and activities after the great fire of 1871. Joseph S. Sosman moved to Chicago in 1874, with the Sosman & Landis studio being established by 1877. Sosman & Landis was the primary manufacturer and installer of Brown’s special system in Scottish Rite theaters across the country.

At Sosman & Landis, Strong, Moses, and another stage carpenter by the name of Charles S. King were part of a special group; this group could be considered scenic artists with a thorough understanding of stage machinery, or stage carpenters who paint extremely well. Each had a specific task that he gravitated toward, but their job title by no means limited their abilities and contributions to one task or a single skill. Others in this group included Walter Burridge and Ernest Albert. Albert and Burridge were two of three founders who established another Chicago scenic studio in 1891 – Albert, Grover, and Burridge. One of their largest projects would be the manufacture and delivery of scenery and stage machinery for the Beckwith Memorial Theatre in Dowagiac, Michigan. This theater is significant within the framework of American theatre history.

Here is a refresher of the Albert, Grover & Burridge before revisiting the Beckwith Memorial Theatre and its link to the Chicago Auditorium. Ernest Albert (1857-1946), Oliver Dennett Grover (1861-1927) and Walter Burridge (1857-1913) founded “Albert, Grover & Burridge.” Their studio was located at 3127-33 State Street, Chicago, covering an area of 100×125 feet. Two of the founders had a significant tie to stage carpenter Bairstow: Albert worked as a scenic artist for the Chicago Auditorium and Chicago Opera House, while Walter Burridge was the scenic artist for both the Grand Opera House and McVicker’s. Keep in mind that John Bairstow worked as a stage carpenter at McVickers, the Grand Opera and the Chicago Auditorium. Grover was an art instructor at the Chicago Art Institute and linked to the planning of the Columbian Exposition. Albert and Burridge both worked with Thomas G. Moses at Sosman & Landis during the 1880s. Each would have known the long-time Sosman & Landis stage carpenter, Charles S. King. King is also a possible contender for the conception and development of Brown’s special system.

Advertisement for Albert, Grover & Burridge

The scenic studio of Albert, Grover & Burridge is described in “Chicago and its Resources Twenty Years After, 1871-1891: A Commercial History Showing the Progress and Growth of Two Decades from the Great Fire to the Present Time.” The studio was mentioned as implementing advancements in the methods of mounting and presentation of stage plays. Albert, Grover & Burridge leased the old Casino building on State Street, just south of 31^st street, and renovated it. Their space included 12,000 square feet of working area, and another 2,500 square feet devoted to storage and sewing room. There were twenty paint frames, ranging from 56 by 35 feet to 30 by 20 feet. This was a sizable complex.

A unique feature implemented by Albert, Grover & Burridge was that it included a staging area for scenic effects and innovations. The abovementioned publication reports, “The studio is so large that it permits the artists to introduce a novel feature in the art of painting scenery, which has been in their thoughts for some years. That is after a scene is painted, it can be hung, set and lighted in an open space the full size of any stage in the country, so that a manager can not only inspect it as an entirety, and thus suggest alterations, but he can bring his company to the studio and rehearse with the new scenery.” This idea had already been partially implemented by the Hanlon brothers at their private theater and workspace in Cohasset, where their master mechanic William Knox Brown tested new stage machinery and effects. Albert, Grover & Burridge went beyond the manufacture of scenery – they were the visionaries who combined painted illusion, lighting innovations, and new stage machinery. They were no different from other scenic studios in Chicago, they just had the space to expand and add a staging area. Scenic studios, with their staff of stage carpenters and scenic artists remained at the forefront of technological advancements, integrating old techniques with new technology. Unfortunately for Albert, Grover & Burridge, their business venture went bankrupt in two years, so they were not around when E. A. Armstrong and Bestor G. Brown were looking for a scenic studio to subcontract for Scottish Rite work. Sosman & Landis were waiting in the wings. However, their contributions can not be discounted when looking at the circle of innovators who helped disseminate the new counterweight technology.

By 1901, a Minneapolis “Star Tribune” article notes new settings at the Bijou Theatre in the article “Experts Behind the Scenes” (January 13). This provides a little context into the shifting staging techniques for commercial theater productions: “The stage proper was divided by the old system of grooves, which were used to hold up the scenery into divisions, one, two, three and four, where the stage was extra deep, sometimes five and six. Grooves are a mechanical contrivance in which the scenes slide back and forth. This method of stage setting is very seldom employed at the present time, the more modern arrangements of setting scenes in a box shape, supporting them with braces and connecting them by lash lines, being more common use.” At the same time box sets became more standard leg drops and fly scenery replaced wings, shutters, and roll drops.

In 1899 the fly scenery at the Beckwith Memorial Theatre is examined in “W.A. Norton’s Directory of Dowagiac, Cassopolis and La Grange, Pokagon, Silver Creek and Wayne Townships” (1899). The publication reports, “The scenery is designed for the cyclorama effect which has been found so effective, and which was first used in the Auditorium in Chicago. By this arrangement a scene can be set as a street or garden by simply moving the scenes which are profiled on both sides and top, anywhere desired. Every set of scenery is a finished piece of art. It is, after the latest fashion, lashed together with ropes and is capable of being made into seventy-five distinct stage dressings” (page 159). Earlier newspapers described the thirty-six hanging drops that could be combined in various combinations for seventy-six set possibilities.

Drop curtain by Albert, Grover, & Burridge for the Beckwith Memorial Theatre

The Dowagiac “Republican” from January 18, 1893 described the new building as “The finest theater in America,” elaborating on the painted scenery: “It is the fitting and arrangement of the stage in the Beckwith Memorial Theatre, that the greatest care has been exercised to obtain the best possible results, and a great degree of success has been obtained. To go into technicalities and the use of stage terms would not be perhaps intelligible to our readers generally, so we will note only the main points. The stage is fifty by thirty-eight feet. Up to the gridiron, from which is suspended by an elaborate system of lines and pulleys all of the stage settings it is possible to use in the form of drop curtains, is fifty feet, allowing ample room for hoisting out of sight a whole screen in a few seconds, and allowing rapid changing of scenes so necessary to the continuing of the action of a play and effects are made possible that were unknown in the old days of sliding flats. To those acquainted with and interested in things theatrical and matters pertaining to proper stage fitting we think it is sufficient guarantee of the success of the stage to say that Albert, Grover & Burridge, of Chicago, had the direction of the stage fittings and the wall decorations of the auditorium and the entire building. Ernest Albert, of A., G., & B., under whose direction the art glass, colorings, the selection of draperies, and the furnishings of the theater were made, had succeeded admirably in producing the most beautiful and harmonious whole.”

The Beckwith Memorial Theatre of Dowagiac, Michigan, was built in 1892 for the cost of one hundred thousand dollars. Albert, Grover & Burridge directed the plan and installation of all stage fittings, the wall decorations of the auditorium, and painted décor throughout the entire building. This was a major extravagance for a small town that numbered less than seven thousand people. For more information pertaining to this theater, see past installment 134.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 630 – Bestor G. Brown and the E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co.

Part 630: Bestor G. Brown and E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co.

In 1909, Moses wrote, “The Dallas Masonic work came in early, so did San Francisco and Cleveland, Ohio.” That year, Moses also supervised scenery collections for Scottish Rite theaters in Kansas City, Kansas, Winona, Minnesota, and Atlanta, Georgia. Today we look at the Kansas and Bestor G. Brown (1861-1917) before looking at the Scottish Rite installation in Kansas City, Kansas, during 1909.

Starting in the 1890s, Kansas became a hot bed of Scottish Rite activity. Theatre construction, new degree productions, and Masonic celebrations drew men together from across the region. It was during this time that both fraternal and business alliances were formed. Bestor G. Brown became the central hub on a spinning wheel of fraternal activity. As I have discussed in recent posts, Brown, would become the future western sales representative of the M. C. Lilley & Co., with his regional offices in Kansas City, Missouri. Brown joined Siloam Lodge No. 225, on March 11, 1884, where he served as Master in 1887 and 1888. Brown was also involved with other Masonic orders, such as the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, York Rite, Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, and Order of the Eastern Star. In fact, Brown’s outstanding fraternal service gained him title to Kansas Lodge No. 433 A. F. & A. M. Lodge on March 1, 1923. It is now the Bestor G. Brown Lodge No. 433. Brown was involved with other non-Masonic fraternities, such as the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, the Knights of Pythias and the Benevolent and Protected Order of Elks. I have to ask myself where the guy found enough time to do it all as he traveled so much.

Bestor G. Brown pictured in the American Tyler, 1908, page 471.

Brown became a traveling salesman, peddling supplies for E. A. Armstrong during the 1890s. This was before Brown became the western sales manager for M. C. Lilley & Co. in 1904. From 1897 until 1902, Brown had special charge of the Armstrong’s Masonic department and secured ALL of the consistory contracts except one. That one was in Columbus, Ohio, however, by 1909, he would secure that Consistory contract too. In the 1902 publication “Masonic Voice-Review,” an article titled “Original and Reliable” commended the quality of products manufactured by the E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company of Chicago and Brown’s contribution. The article noted, “Excepting the Consistory at Columbus, Ohio, they have furnished the equipment and paraphernalia for every Consistory in the United States that has been in the market for an outfit in the past five years… The Consistories that have been equipped within the period mentioned by the company are located at Indianapolis, Ind.; Little Rock, Ark.; Galveston, Tex.; Kansas City, Miss.; Wichita, Kan.; Guthrie, Okla.; Fargo, N.D.; and St. Louis, Mo.” The article continued, “The Eminent Sir Bestor G. Brown has special charge of the Masonic Department, and his intelligence and energetic methods coupled with a thorough knowledge of the requirements of the Craft has much to do with the notable success of this branch of the business.”

This is a big deal, as it suggested that E. A. Armstrong captured the Scottish Rite theater business of the entire Southern Jurisdiction after Pike’s passing; remember, Pike, was not a supporter of stage degree productions and he was in charge of the Southern Jurisdiction until his death in 1891.

Brown was there when the Southern Jurisdictions first designed and installed their new scenery. He would be there again when these Masonic venues grew and needed new scenery a decade later. The only difference was that Brown would later be representing M. C. Lilley & Co. Consider this…the Valley’s were repurchasing scenery thru Brown. This did not necessarily mean that they were going with another company; they were going with the same man who just happened to now work for a new company. Brown knew what they wanted and what they already had. In other words, the Consistories believed he would take care of them as a fellow 32nd degree Scottish Rite Mason.

The April 15, 1908, issue of “The American Tyler” would credit Brown as “the only Masonic stage manager in the country.” The article would further explain, “This is because he has a national reputation among scenic artists and builders of stage appliances, and because he created and developed the application of modern scenic properties to the dramatic presentation of all Masonic degrees. More value is probably attached to his opinion in such matters than to that of any other man in the country, and he is almost invariably consulted in regard to the construction of stages for the work of the Scottish Rite, everywhere throughout the United States.”

Each Scottish Rite Valley’s loyalty was to Brown and not necessarily the company he represented – M. C. Lilley. The scenic studio of Sosman & Landis was closely linked to Brown and his business. Brown and Sosman were both Scottish Rite Masons. After Sosman died in 1915 and Brown died in 1917, the Masonic connection dried up and much business went to Toomey & Volland who had been steadily building up their Masonic repertoire. And guess what? Volland was a Scottish Rite Mason and in charge of the stage direction at the Scottish Rite in St. Louis; the same as Brown who had been in charge of the stage direction in Wichita, Kansas. Volland was the “shiny new thing” on the Masonic playground. Volland got his Masonic scenery start in 1902, when Toomey & Volland were subcontracted by E. A. Armstrong to deliver $6,200 worth of scenery and stage equipment to the St. Louis Consistory during May and Brown was the one to negotiate the contract.

To be continued…

Tales from a Scenic Artist and Scholar. Part 629 – The Cleveland Scottish Rite, 1909

Part 629: The Cleveland Scottish Rite, 1909

The Valley of Cleveland consists of a ten-county area in northern Ohio. The four Scottish Rite bodies included the Eliadah Lodge of Perfection, Bahurim Council, Ariel Chapter and Lake Erie Consistory. I have uncovered very little information about the building occupied by the Cleveland Scottish Rite before their move to their new home at 3615 Euclid Avenue. The previous Masonic Temple was built in 1883 and located at Superior Avenue and East 6^th St.

Masonic Temple in Cleveland where the Scottish Rite met before the 1921 Masonic Auditorium was constructed.

Of this first home for the Scottish Rite, the “Akron Beacon Journal” noted that eight Akron Masons received the 32^nd degree at the Spring Scottish Rite reunion in Cleveland (10 March 1910, page 4). The article reported, “The territory covered at this meeting is of northeastern Ohio. Several hundred are expected from the cities. Between 50 and 100 from Akron intend to go. There will be a class of 95 who will take their degrees up through the 32^nd degree.” The first Masonic Temple was obviously a sizable space.

Masonic Auditorium in Cleveland, Ohio. Occupied by the Scottish Rite form 1921-2017.

Construction for the new Masonic building commenced during 1918. Interestingly, in 1919, Toomey & Volland scenic studio records indicate that they created scenery for the Cleveland Scottish Rite Temple. Ten years earlier, Sosman & Landis created the scenery for degree work in Cleveland. After 1915, it was not uncommon for Toomey & Volland to underbid Sosman & Landis on Masonic projects, especially in the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction. The Masonic connection provided by Joseph S. Sosman, of Sosman & Landis, disappeared when he passed away in 1915. Thomas G. Moses had taken over the company but was not yet a Mason.

Masonic Auditorium in Cleveland, Ohio, built in 1921

The new Masonic Temple in Cleveland was designed by Hubbell & Benes, the same firm that designed the Cleveland museum of art in 1916. Home to many Masonic Orders, including the Scottish Rite, the massive Masonic structure covered 102,000 square feet of space, with a 2200-seat auditorium. Acclaimed for its acoustics, the Masonic Temple was once home to the Cleveland Orchestra for a decade, before their move in 1931 to Severance Hall.

Smaller theatre in Cleveland Masonic Auditorium building

Smaller theatre in Cleveland Masonic Auditorium building. View from stage

As with many other Masonic buildings of this scope, declining membership after World War II and escalated expenses from deferred maintenance cause the Cleveland Masons to put their building on the market in 2017. The corporate secretary of the Cleveland Scottish Rite admitted that it cost $400,000 a year to maintain the building, “an outlay that would soon exhaust the operating endowment.” There is an article from 6, August, 2015 that includes some lovely photographs of the building. Here is the link to many of the attached pictures (https://www.cleveland.com/architecture/index.ssf/2015/08/landmark_masonic_auditorium_-.html).

Nearly one hundred years after construction began on the Masonic Auditorium in Cleveland, it was sold to a private developer. An affiliate of Arkansas-based Beaty Capital Group, Inc. paid only $725,000 for the complex on March 31, 2017. Cleveland’s Masonic building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the property is eligible for preservation funding including state and federal tax credits.

This is the same group that purchased the Scottish Rite in Forth Smith, Arkansas.

Scottish Rite Temple in Fort Smith, Arkansas

A subsidiary of the Beaty Capital Group, TempleLive (https://www.templelive.com/about/), also purchased the Zembo Shrine building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in 2018 (https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/01/zembo_shrine_sale_shriners_ple.html).

Zembo Shrine in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

In Cleveland, Fort Smith and Harrisburg, the Fraternity will never be able to afford the expense of constructing anything comparable. The materials and craftsmanship necessary to build these types of buildings are often no longer available. In Cleveland, the chandeliers are made from pieces of shell and hobnailed doors lead to the auditorium. The ones who lose are future generations of Masons who will never experience the space, or the physical sense of heritage. The buildings were planned and constructed by men with vision. It also takes vision to place Freemasonry in the context of today and contemplate how these venues can be saved. The winners in the end are those who are able to purchase these jewels for less than market price and turn a profit.

To be continued…