Mike, Rick, Megumi, and I walked from the Theatre Royal Glasgow to the King’s Theatre on the morning of Sept. 16. There we met Alan Butland, who had journeyed up from Newcastle upon Tyne to spend the day with us.
Our visit to King’s Theatre had been facilitated by Gary Painter, of the UK’s Cinema Theatre Association, who had arranged for us to tag along with a public tour.
Mike Hume, Megumi, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Rick Boychuk and Alan Butland at the King’s Theatre. Glasgow.
The King’s Theatre, Glasgow, Scotland
Auditorium at the King’s Theatre, Glasgow.
Detail of ornamental decor at King’s Theatre, Glasgow.
Entrance of the King’s Theatre, Glasgow.
Architectural details above the King’s Theatre entrance.
The waiting area before entering the auditorium, known as the Wedgewood Room. We tagged along with a public tour.
Ornamental details that caused this waiting area outside of the main auditorium to be named the Wedgewood Room.
Ornamental details that caused this waiting area outside of the main auditorium to be named the Wedgewood Room.
View from center stage.
Proscenium and opera boxes.
Another view of the boxes.
The ceiling at King’s Theatre.
Designed by well-known English architect Frank Matcham (1854-1920), the King’s Theatre opened on Sept. 12, 1904. The stage house still boasts a paint frame at the back. The shuttered windows (top right in picture below) illuminated the scenic artists’ paint studio.
Paint frame at the back of King’s Theatre, Scotland.
Another view of the paint frame and studio space.
Another view of the paint framefrom the fly floor.
Looking up at the paint bridge (paint studio was to the immediate right of the bridge.
Rick Boychuk on the fly floor at King’s Theatre, Glasgow (stage right).
Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, and I took the train from Newcastle upon Tyne, England, to Glasgow, Scotland, on Sept. 15. We were scheduled to meet up with Megumi (scenic art tutor at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland) and visit three theaters. Alan Butland also traveled up from Newcastle to spend time with us on our adventure.
Megumi in front of Wallace Studios, Royal Conservatoire Scotland. We first met at a CITT (Canadian Institute of Theatre Technology) scene painting workshop (2018, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada).
For our Glasgow visit, Mike scheduled tours at the Theatre Royal, King’s Theatre, and the Citizen’s Theatre (the Citz). Our visit to both the Theatre Royal Glasgow and the King’s Theatre was facilitated by Gary Painter of UK’s Cinema Theatre Association. He could not have been more accommodating or kind!
Gary and Mike at the stage door, Theatre Royal Glasgow.
When all was said and done, we visited seven theaters before hopping a train for Edinburgh that evening.
Mike Hume in action at the Theatre Royal Glasgow.Hume’s theatre photography is not only beautiful, but also informative.
None of our theater visits would have been possible without Hume’s previous visits to the venues, and various relationships that he has cultivated over the years. Thank you again, Mike!
Here are a few of my photographs from our visit on Sept. 13, 2023.
Here is also the link to the Theatre Royal Glasgow’s website:
On the evening of Sept.12, 2023, Hume, Boychuk and I attended a production of Noises Off! (Hume’s favorite show). It was very well done!
Interestingly, Noises Off was produced at Theatre Royal Bath and returned the same day that we later toured the venue (Sept. 19). It was fascinating to examine the same set at both venues. Here is a link for more information about the Noises Off production and tour, as it is well worth seeing: https://www.theatreroyal.org.uk/events/noises-off/
Produced at the Theatre Royal Bath, the show stars Liza Goddard, Matthew Kelly and Simon Shepherd. Newcastle Theatre Royal was the second venue on a tour that ran from Aug 23, 2023 – Feb 17, 2024.
Auditorium,Theatre Royal, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Safety Curtain brought down at intermission, painted in 2006by Phil R. Daniels.
View from the gallery. Theatre Royal, Newcastle upon Tyne, during Sept. 14 tour.
Detail of ceiling ornament.
Proscenium ornament detail.
Detail of spotlight box in gallery rail. A brilliant Frank Matcham touch!
Detail of balcony ornament.
The theater was also part of the international theatre conference tour on the morning of Sept. 14. Dr. David Wilmore gave a brief presentation of the history of the theatre, and then the delegates toured the auditorium and backstage areas.
Dr. David Wilmore leading Theatre Royal tour on Sept. 14, 2023.
Dr. David Wilmore leading Theatre Royal tour on Sept. 14, 2023.
Although the building’s façade dates from 1837, the interior dates is more recent. Frank Matcham designed the 1901 auditorium after fire destroyed the interior in 1899.
On Sept. 12, 2023, Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, and I visited the York Theatre Royal. It was only a short walk from our first stop that morning at the Grand Opera House.
Entrance for the York Theatre Royal.
Entrance of the York Theatre Royal.
Despite a very modern entrance, much of the complex was built in 1744, replacing a previous theatre located in the Minister Yard. The current theater was constructed on the same site as a medieval hospital, with remnants of the 12th century stonework still visible throughout the building, most often as archways.
Section with medieval architecture on upstage wall.
Amazingly, there is even earlier architectural elements below the stage, dating from Roman occupation.
Prior to our visit, Hume contacted Mike Woodcock about gaining access to the backstage area. It was Woodcock who arranged a tour with Grace Branch, Deputy Head of Stage. Although relatively new in her position, Branch is extremely knowledgeable, gracious, and accommodated all of our requests.
Rick Boychuk and Grace Branchat the York Theatre Royal.
Here are a few more pictures from our tour.
York Theatre Royal auditorium.
York Theatre Royal auditorium.
Proscenium arch detail (top).
Opera box ornament at the York Theatre Royal.
View from the stage.
Theatre Royal York stage and auditorium.
View from stage right.
Looking up at the gridiron.
The fly floor.
Weight information.
Hall Stage counterweight system.
Weights.
Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Rick Boychuk, Mike Hume, and Grace Branch at the York Theatre Royal.
On Sept. 12, 2023, Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, and I visited two theaters in York, Yorkshire, England. Today’s post is about our first stop and tour at the Grand Opera House York. Hume had arranged a tour with Technical and Buildings Manager, Joe Strange (pictured below).
Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Mike Hume, Joe Strange, and Rick Boychuk at the Grand Opera House York.
For geographical context, York is located north of London, at the confluence where the Foss and Ouse Rivers. Founded in 71 AD when Roman General Quintus Petillius Cerialis and the Ninth Legion constructed a military fortress. Roman origins remain quite visible throughout the city, forming the basis for later medieval structures.
Our walk to the Grand Opera House and Theatre Royal provided a wonderful opportunity to explore York. On a grey damp day, we passed by “The Shambles” (a medieval street), Sir Thomas Herbert’s House (Tudor), the Cathedral and Metropolitan Church of Saint Peter (York Minster), and the Assembly Rooms.
Walking through the Shambles section of York.
Sir Thomas Herbert’s House.
York Minster.
Another view of York Minster.
The Assembly Rooms. The building was erected by public subscription 1730-1736 to the design of Richard Boyle, Earl of Burlington.
The theater emerged from a previous building, dating from 1868. It was architect John P. Briggs who drew plans that converted a corn exchange and warehouse to a performance space. This 1902 venue recently underwent a major refurbishment.
Hume arranged a tour with Joe Strange, Technical and Building Manager of the Grand Opera House York.
Stage door and loading doors, Grand Opera House York.Joe is in the red shirt waiting at the stage door.
The exterior of the building still boasts tall doors; doors that provided necessary access for touring wings and other large flats. Here are several photos from our tour
A view of the auditorium from the stage.
Metal safety curtain at the Grand Opera House York.
Detail of safety curtain.
Backside of the safety curtain.
Ben Hur mural above the proscenium.
The Ben Hur mural above the proscenium arch.
Detail of the mural.
Detail of the mural.
Joe Strange in theupper gallery at the Grand Opera House York.
Auditorium Grand Opera House York.View of the opera boxes.
Opera Box detail.
More ornamental decor.
View of the stage and auditorium.
Looking up at the gridiron.
Rick Boychuk and Joe Strange discussing the grid.
The grid.
The grid.
The Fly floor looking upstage.
The fly floor.
This may be the most cozy fly floor that I have encountered to date.
My favorite backstage sign…“make it epic…”
The bridge (upstage/exterior wall). View from stage left.
I greatly appreciate the time that Joe spent giving us a tour of the building and sharing the history of this beautiful theater.
On Sept. 10, 2023, Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, Grit Eckert, and I visited the Drury Lane Theatre.
Hume had scheduled a backstage tour with Michael “Biglad” Burgess-Shaw Head of Stage, Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The tour was remarkable, both entertaining and informative as we explored the extensive the backstage area.
Rick Boychuk, Grit Eckert, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Biglad, and Mike Hume backstage at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane.
A view from above the stage.
Although everything was fascinating, my favorite part of the backstage tour was visiting the old paint studio. There is so much history spattered on the paint frames, walls, and floor. I have traced the careers of so many scenic artists who worked here. There is nothing quite like standing in the same spot where so many scenic artists, brush in hand, stood for decades.
The paint shop with four paint frames (two in the center).
Paint frame detail.
Paint frame detail, looking up toward skylights.
Next to the paint shop was the scenery storage area; now the main office. Old drops (from a touring production of Oklahoma) now decorated only one wall, now the sole legacy of a space that once housed so many more.
Photograph by Mike Hume. Extant “Oklahoma” drops on the wall.
Drops from a touring production of “Oklahoma” now decorate one wall.
Biglad, Grit, Rick, Wendy and Mike at Drury Lane.
We returned to the theater on September 11 for a front-of-house tour. Mark Fox showed us the rest of the building. We couldn’t have had a better tour guide. Fox is an amazing theatre historian, archivist and advertising manager for LW Theatres. Fox even wrote the book Theatre Royal Drury.
Wendy Waszut-Barrett. Mark Fox, Rick Boychuk and Mike Hume.
The Auditorium.
The Royal Box.
View from the Royal Box.
View from the balcony.
The tour wonderful! Mark’s passion about the building is evident, and he is full of fascinating information about the theater’s history, renovations, and decor.
Print of the auditorium.
Print of the rotunda and principle staircases.
The rotunda.
Looking across the rotunda.
Section of a main staircases.
Main staircase.
View from the exterior balcony.
View of the same balcony from the street.
Here are a few more pictures of highlights from our visit.
One of my favorite paintings – Fortunes by G. D. Leslie, RA. It was for the Royal Jubilee, 1887 Exposition. It is now on display in room behind the Royal Box.
Painted detail.
Painted detail.
Painted detail.
The second painting in the same room of June (actress, singer, dancer) by Herbert Draper.
Painted detail.
Painted detail.
Painted detail.
Painting by Seymour Lucas, Study of a New Act Curtain, 1911.
On Sept. 8, 2023, I boarded a plane in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for London, England. Mike Hume, Rick Boychuk, and I were presenting papers at the Tyne Opera House and Theatre Conference: Victorian and Edwardian Theatre in Performance, Music & Machinery – Stagecraft & Spectacle, scheduled for Sept. 13-15.
We planned our itinerary to include a few historic theater stops, both before and after the conference. When all was said and done, we visited fifteen theaters over the course of ten days.
In London, the Globe Theatre was our first stop on the morning of September 10.
Mike Hume, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, and Rick Boychuk at the Globe Theatre, London, England.
The Globe Theatre, London.
Painted details at the Globe Theatre.
Painted details on the Globe Theatre stage.
More painted details.
The Globe Theatre stage.
The stage ceiling at the Globe Theatre.
Arriving a few days before the conference also gave me a chance to meet London-based scenic artist, Grit Eckert. Eckert and I virtually met in 2018. We both share a passion for historic scenic art and had been corresponding about people and processes for a few years. In addition to finally getting to meet Eckert in person, she was also presenting a paper at the conference. In fact, I was the chair of her panel on Sept. 15; a panel composed of Eckert, Jim Davis (Professor of Theatre Studies at the University of Warwick), and John Plunkett (Associate Professor, Department of English, University of Exeter).
Eckert is a PhD candidate at the University of Bristol. She started her professional life as a scenic artist in the workshops of a regional theatre in Germany. She moved to England to study Scenic Arts, and over the past two decades has examined scene painting practices from various different angles. Eckert both works as a scene painter and instructor. Like me, Eckert is fascinated with the history of the trade and those scenic artists who came before us.
Later in the day, we went backstage at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. Hume had arranged a private tour with Michael Biglad Burgess-Shaw, Head of Stage. With a little time to spare, we wandered around a bit, visiting the Tate Modern, peering into the paint shop windows at the National Theatre, passing through the central courtyard of Somerset House, wandering into the Savoy, and strolling by the Vaudeville, Adelphi, Coliseum, and Garrick Theaters. After all, it is the Theatre District. We made our way back to Drury Lane, and eagerly waited to meet Biglad at the stage door.
Mike Hume, Wendy Waszut-Barrett, Grit Eckert and Rick Boychuk.
On November 30, 2022, I received a FB message from Robert Van Dillen, a St. Louis-based scenic artist. He asked if I would consider being guest speaker for an upcoming scenic art event in St. Louis, tentatively scheduled for the beginning of 2023. Van Dillen explained that there was a group of local scenic artists who wanted to see the St. Louis Scottish Rite scenery collection before the building was sold. Unfortunately, the tentative date coincided with my trip to the Galveston Scottish Rite. We looked at a couple of possibilities, and then scheduled the event to coincide with my March trip to USITT.
My last visit to the St. Louis Scottish Rite theatre also coincided with USITT in 2017. This is a remarkable scenery collection delivered by Toomey & Volland, of St. Louis. I spent much of the conference documenting the scenery, stage machinery, and building.
Tomoey & Volland Studio stencil on the back of a Scottish Rite backdrop.
Just prior to the conference, I documented the gridiron with Rick Boychuk and Richard Nix.
High above the St. Louis Scottish Rite stage with Rick Boychuk and Richard Nix in 2017.
One of many photos from my trip to the St. Louis Scottish Rite Theatre in 2017.
On this trip, I arrived at the St. Louis Scottish Rite by 9AM on Sunday morning, March 19, 2023. I was accompanied by my close friend and colleague, Jenny Knott. Alessia Carpoca, Mike Monsos, and Martha (University of Montana – Missoula) soon joined us, as they had an early flight to catch; one that prevented them from staying for the entire presentation. From 9-10:30 a.m., we shifted furniture, set up the power point, and double checked the lines. I wanted to make sure that everything was in working order for my presentation. This also provided Mike, Alessia, and Martha, with the opportunity to see some of the drops before their early departure. I am very grateful to Mike for handling the operating lines during this time!
At 10:30 a.m., I gave a quick power-point presentation to provide some context, placing what we were going to see within the context of American scenic art and theatre history. By “quick” I mean thirty minutes! Then we brought in one scene after another for the next three hours. By 2 p.m. I called it quits, due my impending flight and grumbling stomach. We grabbed a quick bit to eat and then I was on my way to the airport.
The St. Louis Scottish Rite Theatre is a sight to behold. It is a three-thousand-seat auditorium that boasts a 90’-0” wide proscenium opening.
The St. Louis Scottish Rite auditorium. Looking up into the flies at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Scenery by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.
The size and scope of this Masonic scenery collection is almost unparalleled, with the McAlester Scottish Rite from 1929 being a major contender. There are 147 line sets, with stage machinery and scenery produced by the Toomey & Volland studio in 1923. There are a few drops that pre-date the building, a couple more that were delivered in later years.
The Scenic Studio where the St. Louis Scottish Rite scenery was painted in 1923.
Sadly, this may be the last time I get to visit and examine this remarkable scenery collection. Like many massive Masonic buildings, it is up for sale. Rumors of a sale had already begun in 2017. This is not surprising, considering a series of obstacles faced by many fraternal organizations; challenges that range from declining membership and insufficient funds to high utility bills and a long-term practice of deferred maintenance. My only hope is that when the building is sold, the scenery is somehow preserved for future generations. This collection really needs to be professionally documented, complete with lights and props, before it disappears.
Many thanks to Rob for organizing this event. I also want to thank his wonderful colleagues who so warmly welcomed me to St. Louis. I am grateful that we were able to share this experience together.
Here are a few pictures from our day at the St. Louis Scottish Rite.
A painted scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.Metallic strips that make the foliage sparkle under stage light.My host, Rob Van Dillen behind a section of theatrical gauze.Scenic artists at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.Changing scenes at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.A few of the scenic artists who gathered at the Scottish Rite on March 19, 2023.Scenic Artists at the St. Louis Scottish Rite on March 19, 2023.Painted detail from the carpenter shop scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. Landscape backdrop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a landscape drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a landscape drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Painted detail from a drop at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.The Camp Scene at the St. Louis Scottish Rite. March 19, 2023.Scene by Toomey & Volland Studios, c. 1923.
In January, I was contacted by Diane Nagy, President of the Kimmswick Historical Society. For geographical context, Kimmswick, Missouri, is a very small river town about 26 miles south of St. Louis. The Kimmswick Historical Society had recently acquired a large painting by J. U. Tschudi. Dated 1914, the artist titled the painting, “Early Days on the Mississippi River.” While searching for information about the artist, Nagy stumbled across my post about Tschudi at www.drypigment.net. Tschudi represented the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887. This firm was affiliated with the Sosman & Landis Scene Painting Studio in Chicago. The two firms shared projects and artists over the decades, remaining affiliates until the 1920s.
My trip to St. Louis for the United States Institute of Theatre Technology conference this month provided me with an opportunity to examine the Tschudi painting and meet Kimmswick Historical Society members. On March 18, I journeyed south, accompanied by my close friend and colleague, Jenny Knott. Diane Nagy and Nadine Garland provided shuttle service and conversation for the day. We spent most of the afternoon chatting about historical artifacts and the intriguing history of Kimmswick.
Our first stop was to see the oil painting, currently stored at the studio of Irek T. Szelag. Szelag is a Polish immigrant nearing retirement. In fact, this will be his last commission. We were joined at Szelag’s studio by a few other Historical Society members; they were curious to about hear about my knowledge of Tschudi and his work. The decision to preserve Tschudi’s work was hotly contested by half of the ten-member Kimmswick Historical Society Board of Directors, necessitating a tie-breaking vote by the president. Not everyone was keen to spend a large amount of money on this heavily damaged painting.
Painting by J. U. Tschudi at Szelag’s studio on March 18, 2023.
The Kimmswick Historical Society is a small non-profit organization that does not accept State or Federal aid. Their operating budget is obtained through donations and the sale of apple butter. The funding of every Historical Society project is translated into the sale of “jars” and “cars.” “Jars” refers to the sale of apple butter and “cars” refers to the sale of parking spots when thousands of people descend upon this small town of 146 residents for the Apple Butter Festival https://gokimmswick.com/apple-butter-festival-kimmswick/ . Each year, the Historical Society sells approximately 6000 jars of apple butter. Of this amount, 500 jars are still made on site, using a massive copper kettle over an open fire. By the way, each jar of apple butter sells for $6; a fabulous deal, considering the extensive amount of time is takes to prep, cook and can the apples.
The Kimmswick Historical Society stand at the Apple Butter Festival.Apple butter pot on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.
Back to Tschudi’s artwork…
When I initially examined pictures of Tschudi’s painting, I was struck by his inclusion of a title and painted surround. It looked more like circus banner than an oil painting intended for a residential wall. In fact, it reminded me of early twentieth-century state displays at world fairs or other industrial expositions. Upon close inspection, I notice that the edges of the canvas had been hemmed, like early marketing banners that were intended to advertise a public entertainment. I am positive that this artwork was created to be tacked onto a wall, the side of a building, or fence; advertising some public event or spectacle.
Hemmed edge of the Tschudi painting.Title and painted frame of the Tschudi painting.
After leaving Szelag’s studio, we spent the remainder of the afternoon touring the Kimmswick Historical Society and enjoying a fabulous lunch at the oldest building in town. Designated, “The Old House” this structure was originally built in 1770. The reason for selecting tis particular eating establishment was that Tschudi’s painting once hung in a front room, near a fire place; a fireplace that never vented properly, hence the discoloration of the painting over time.
Wall where the Tschudi painting was once located in the Old House.Sketch of the Old House in Kimmswick, currently on display at the Kimmswick Historical Society.
In addition to lunch, our hosts gifted us Kimmswick Historical Society cookbooks upon our departure. It is one of the more interesting compilations of Midwest and Southern recipes that I have come across in recent year. Yes, the apple butter recipe is included too! Overall, I had a delightful time learning about Kimmswick and its history.
The Kimmswick Historical Society Cookbook includes the recipe for their apple butter.
While sitting in the St. Louis airport on March 19, I began to re-examine the life and career of J. U. Tschudi, searching for possible clues that might lead to the origin of his painting. This quest continued upon my return home. I arrived sick and began a week-long quarantine in the basement, desperately trying to keep my germs to myself. My son’s High School Orchestra was spending the first part of Spring Break in New York City. I really didn’t want him to catch this bug. Fortunately, my self-imposed quarantine provided me with an opportunity to re-examine Tschudi’s life and career. My previous post about Tschudi from 2020 was quite brief, intended as only a side story to my history about the Kansas City Scenic Company. Tschudi was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co., working alongside B. F. Dunn and C. A. Oldham.
Here is my expanded tale about this fascinating artist and painting.
Like many nineteenth-century American immigrants, the story of Tschudi begins in Europe and ends in the Midwest. His tale could be called “From Switzerland to St. Louis,” was he passed away at 728 South Second Street, only a short walk from the Convention Center that hosted USITT. Both Tschudi and his son worked as scenic artists for the Kansas City Scenic Art Co. during the early Twentieth Century. Combined, they are responsible for hundreds of stage settings delivered throughout the United States between 1880 and 1940.
John Ulrich Tschudi was born on March 22, 1850, in Switzerland. Named after his father, he was the son of Johann Ulrich Tschudy (1822-1886) and Anna Margaretha Egli (1821-). In 1856, the Tschudi family emigrated to the United States with his family. They departed a ship named the Ocean Steed on March 22, 1856 – Tschudy’s 6th birthday. Passengers included John Ulrich Tschudy (34 yrs.), wife Ann Mary (35 yrs.), and children Cath (10 yrs.), Valentin (8 yrs.), Margaretha (7 yrs.), John M. (6 yrs.), Walter (4 yrs.), Tobias (11 mths.). Ann Mary’s father, W. Egli (59 yrs.) also sailed on the same ship. They arrived in the US on July 30, 1856, and soon settled in Burlington, Iowa. Two other Tschudy children were born after moving to Iowa- Minnie (b. 1856) and Lily (b. 1859).
I am going to take a moment to discuss historical records and reported names for John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr. First of all, the family used both Tschudy and Tschudi as their surname in city directories, public records, and newspaper articles. This shift primarily occurred in the 1870s. For the purpose of this post, I will use both.
Secondly, the “U” for Ulrich was often misrepresented as an M, W, A, or even H. This is understandable when you begin to examine how a handwritten cursive capital U can look like other letters, especially in passenger lists and census reports.
To further muddy the waters, there was another Swiss emigrant named John Ulrich Tschudi/Tschudy (1828-1901) who settled in Minnesota. He is a completely different individual who has greatly confused many family genealogists. Minnesota Tschudi lived his life as a farmer, while the main characters of my story – John Ulrich Tschudi Sr. (1822-1886) and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr. (1850-1921) – who worked as a German Presbyterian Church pastor and scenic artist, respectively. With this little bit of information, here is the tale of scenic artist J. U. Tschudi.
In later years, Tschudi Jr. recounted that the Tschudi family only stayed in Burlington for two years before relocating to Memphis, Tennessee, where “he learned his business under the tutelage of his father, who was also an artist.” I can neither confirm nor disprove this statement, as evaded public record until the onset of the Civil War.
By 1861, Tschudi Sr. enlisted in the Union Army. Tschudi Sr. is listed in the “US Adjutant General Military Records, 1631-1976,” available at ancestry.com. The 1864-1864 report lists “John Ulrich Tschudy” of Burlington, Iowa, as a Private in Co. G. of the 57th Illinois Infantry. At the age of 38, he entered into military service on August 26, 1861. Co. G. rendezvoused in Chicago and was quartered at Camp Douglas. Tschudi Jr. was too young to enlist; the official enlistment age was 18 yrs. old. Again, to make things even more confusing, Minnesota Tschudi also fought in the Civil War (Minnesota Infantry, 2nd Regiment).
By 1867, the Tschudy family was living in Dubuque, Iowa. Between 1867 and 1869, Tschudi Sr. is listed as a student at the German Seminary. After completing his studies in Dubuque, In 1867, Tschudi Jr. is listed as a student. It is in Dubuque that Tschudi Jr. meets his future wife, Marguerite Merkes (1850-1931). Merkes is exactly the same age as, Tschudi Jr., was born on March 23, 1850, in Diekirch Luxembourg. Merkes was the daughter of Jean Pierre Merckes/John Peter Merkes (1811-1861) and Clara L. Abend/Abendt (1817-1895). The Merkes family emigrated from Luxembourg to Dubuque, Iowa in 1859, with John Peter Merkes passing in 1864. His widow, Clara Abendt Merkes, remarried in 1864. Her second husband was Michael Fohrman (1811-1894), also an emigrant from Luxembourg.
In 1867, Clara’s 17-yrs. old daughter, Marguerite Merkes, becomes pregnant. As an unwed mother, Marguerite is removed to Chicago where she waits for the impending arrival of her first born. On August 1, 1868, Marguerite gives birth to a son whom she names John, after the baby’s father John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr. It is important to note that the actual birth year of baby John’s birthdate vacillates over the years, ranging from 1867-1869.
Two things happen at this point; decisions that were very characteristic when a child was born out of wedlock. First, the baby is born, but then raised by a grandparent. In this case, baby John returned to Dubuque where he was raised by his maternal grandmother, Clara Abendt Merkes Forman, and his, maternal step-grandfather, Michael Fohrman. John Merkes name instantly becomes John J. Fohrman, and he is clearly listed as the son of Michael and Clara Fohrman. It is only in Michael Fohrman’s will that John J. Fohrman is listed as an “adopted son.” Despite the eventual marriage of John’s parents, Marguerite Merkes and John Ulrich Tschudi Jr., their son is never returned to their care.
In the meantime, Tschudi Sr. completes his training at the Germany Seminary in Dubuque and answers his first call in Platteville, Wisconsin (1870),where he relocates with his wife and four daughters (Margaretha, Lucy, Minnie, and Lillie). Tschudi Jr. and Marguerite remain in Iowa. In 1869, Tschudi Jr.’s occupation was listed as “cigar maker” in the Dubuque Directory; this was when he was living with his father at “Couler av bet Nineteenth and Twentieth.”
By 1872, Tschudi Sr, answers a call to ministry in Memphis, Tennessee. During this entire time, Rev. J. U. Tschudi is associated with the German Presbyterian Church. He is repeatedly listed in the newspapers. During this period, Memphis struggles with yellow fever, losing thousands of its citizens to five major outbreaks. On Oct 15, 1873, “The Central Presbyterian” of Richmond, VA, reported, “Another Bereavement – Rev. J. A. Tschudy, pastor of the German Presbyterian church in Memphis, lost his son, Walter, Oct. 6th, in his 23rd year of his age, of yellow fever” (page 2). This was part of the fourth Yellow fever epidemic in Memphis, where 2500 people passed away between Aug and Oct of that year. At the time it constituted the largest yellow fever outbreak in any inland city. A few months later, the Tschudi family is able to celebrate the marriage of Margaretha Tschudi to minister, Henry A. Grentzenberg. I have yet to locate any mention of Tschudi J. in Memphis during this time. Rev. J. U. Tschudi is last mentioned in Memphis newspapers during 1878. At the time, he was associated with the First German Presbyterian Church, located on the corner of Venice and DeSoto streets. I have yet to uncover any information that links Tschudi Jr. to Memphis. Although he likely traveled throughout the country painting scenery, he married and celebrated the birth of two children in Iowa between 1871 and 1875.
In later years, Tschudi Jr. suggested an alternative story, explaining that from 1868 to 1873 he studied art in Europe. This is highly suspect, especially since he married Marguerite Merkes in Dubuque, Iowa in October 1871 and began raising a family in Iowa by 1873. Daughter Lucy was born in the spring of 1873, with her younger sister, Minnie Lillian, arriving in the spring of 1875. Later newspaper articles about Tschudi Jr. purported, “After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ’I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad.” I have yet to locate any information that suggests his father ever worked as an artist, but you never know.
Here is what I have tracked down about Tschudi Jr.’s scenic art career; a tale compiled from city directories, historical records, and newspaper headlines.
By the late 1870s, Tschudi begins working with Cincinnati fresco artist, William Theodore Blomberg (1829-1909). Tschudi Jr. has several relations in Cincinnati, including his older sister Margaretha (Margaretha Tschudy Grentzenberg). In 1880, Tschudi and Blomberg head to Kansas, where they work as itinerant artists throughout the region that year. Blomberg returns to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi remaining in Kansas.
The first line of Tschudi’s biographical listing entry in “Cutler’s History of Kansas” is “JOHN U. TSCHUDI, fresco and scenic artist, came to Kansas in July 1880.” He arrived a bit earlier than that as Tschudi is mentioned in a Kansas newspaper advertisement that June. On June 16, 1880, the “Augusta Republican” of Augusta, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, painters and frescoers are on hand according to promise and ready to do any kind of fancy work in their line at reasonable rates. Call and leave your orders” (page 3).
Tschudi initially settled in Wichita, before relocating to Emporia. His initial tie to Wichita was to the newly constructed opera house; he and Blomberg were credited with the scenery, as well as their ties to Cincinnati. They were mentioned in letter published in the “McPherson Republican” on August 12, 1880:
“Elk Falls Letter.
Elk Falls, August 9th, 1880.
Editors Republican:- Since leaving McPherson two weeks ago we have taken in the counties of Marion, Butler, Sedgewick, Cowley, Sumner, and now we are now in Elk. From Florence we ran down the Eldorado Branch to Eldorado, the county seat of Butler, and from thence to Augusta by stage. In this town, situated on the St. Louis & San Fransico line to Wichita, we were somewhat surprised to find a regular opera hall, and our surprise was somewhat increased in visiting the hall, to find everything first class. In the construction of the stage, etc., Mr. Israel Zimmerman, the stage carpenter proved himself to be a master of his profession. Messrs. Tschudi & Blomburg, the scenic artists, whose headquarters are at Cincinnati, Ohio, were completing the advertising drop curtain when we were there. They will have one forest scene, six wings, one street scene, one rustic kitchen scene, four wings; one garden and landscape scene, two wings; one prison scene, four wings, and one scenic drop curtain. The stage is arched and the arch is frescoed. The work when done will give them an opera hall to be envied by many towns double their population…” (page 2).
On October 16, 1880, the “Cowley County Monitor” of Winfield, Kansas, reported, Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the fresco artists, are at work on M. L. Robinson’s residence. They also have engagements with J. C. Fuller and M. L. Read. Our citizens who want fresco work cannot do better than secure these gentlemen” (page 3).
On Nov. 25, “The Sumner County Press” of Wellington, Kansas, reported, “Messrs. Tschudi & Blomberg, the artists who did scene painting and fresco work for the opera hall here, also did some fresco paintings on the dwellings of M. L. Reed, S. H. Myton and M. L. Robinson. They have now gone to Wellington to fresco the hall of the PRESS building. On their return they will commence work on Mr. Fulton’s fine dwelling. If the Presbyterians and the Methodists would have their churches frescoed in first class style it would be worth bragging about. Tschudi and Blomberg have done the best work in the State.- Winfield Monitor”(page 3).
Despite their success, Blimberg returned to Cincinnati in 1881, with Tschudi settling in Wichita. It remains unclear as to when Tschudi’s family joined him in Kansas. However, in 1881, Tschudi was living in Wichita. On Oct. 31, 1881, “The Daily Leader” of Wichita reported, “John W. Tschudy, the artist of Wichita, went to Emporia yesterday to paint the scenery in the new Opera House in that town” (page 4). A month later, his ties to Cincinnati were mentioned in an Emporia newspaper. On Nov. 29, 1881, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley Opera House” (page 4).
Tschudi soon partnered with stage carpenter, J. W. Morris, to deliver scenery and stage machinery to the Whitley Opera House. On Dec. 1, 1881, “The Emporia Ledger” reported “Messrs. John W. Tschudi, scenic painter, and J. W. Morris, stage carpenter, the gentlemen who have the contract to furnish and fit the scenery and stage trappings of the Whitley Opera House, commenced work yesterday. They will put in a complete set of scenes and all the latest improvements in stage equipment. They say they find everything about the house in excellent shape for their work, and that they will be able to compete their contract in six or seven weeks. Their work will be so well advanced by the first of January that the house may be used at that time, of desired” (page 3). That same day, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, a scenic artist of much merit from Cincinnati, Ohio, is superintending the painting of the scenery for the Whitley opera house” (page 3). Tschudi was repeatedly mentioned in Emporia newspapers.
Tschudi continued to work in Emporia. On Jan. 26, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported that Tschudi was painting scenery for Ed White’s touring production of ‘Fantanitza,’ scheduled to visit Emporia in March, detailing, “He left an order with Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist who has been employed for some weeks past at the Whitely opera house, for some scenery to be used in bringing out the grand illumination tableau in ‘Fantanitza” The article also mentioned Tschudi’s current work at the Whitley reporting, “There is also a water main behind the drop curtain on the stage with sufficient hose attached to reach over the flys. The scenery has been done by that skillful and well-known artist, John Tcheudy of Switzerland, and is a marvel of beauty…The scenery is sized with fireproof sizing and cannot be kindled into a blaze…” Tschudi’s work at the Whitley certainly boosted his career. On Feb 2. 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported “The stage, one of the best in the west, is 30-x60 feet and is furnished with all the accessories of a metropolitan theatre. These include a variety of excellent scenery suitable for the preparation of all classes of drama; complete and secured appliances for shifting lights, and an exquisite drop curtain representing a charming scene on the Rhine, painted by Mr. Tshudi, one of the most talented scenic artists in the country” (page 3).
The Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, featured scenery by J. U. Tschudi and W. T. Blomberg.An interior view of the Whitley Opera House in Emporia, Kansas, c, 1898.
Tschudi’s success in Emporia soon prompted him to relocate there from Wichita. Initially, he set up a studio at the Whitley Opera House. On March 22 and 23, 1882, “The Evening News” in Emporia announced, “You will find John W. Tschudi at the Whitley opera house ready to do all kinds of house painting, kalsomining, frescoe decorating, plain and fancy sign writing, etc. First-class work at reasonable rates, guaranteed” (page 4). He continued to place one advertisement after another in local papers, securing a variety of local projects that ranged from private residences to commercial signs. On April 8, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Two of the handsomest signs in town were placed in position this morning at the entrance of Robert Jeff’s tobacco ad cigar emporium on Commercial street. They were painted by Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitley opera house and cannot fail to attract attention” (page 4). On April 20, 1882, The Weekly News-Democrat” reported, “A very handsome altar recently completed by the Roberts Brothers has been placed in the upper room of the Franciscan convent, which is used at present as a place of worship for the congregation. The painting, which is beautiful and highly artistic, was done by John Tschudi, scenic artist at the Whitley opera house.” (page 4).
Tschudi landed so many projects at this time, that it became necessary to hire an assistant. On April 15, 1882, “The Evening News” (page 4) reported, “W. S. Walborn, a sign painter, lately of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, is assisting Mr. Tschudi, the scenic artist at the Whitely Opera House” (page 3). This announcement was also published on April 20, 1882, in “The Emporia Weekly News.” In later years, both Tschudi and Walborn worked as scenic artists as the Kansas City Scenic Co.
Tschudi’s work was drawing other prospective theatre proprietors to Wichita to see his work. . On April 22, 1882, and on April 27, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Friday evening we had a pleasant call from Mr. Samuel Smith and a Mr. A. W. Barker, both of Ottawa, Kansas. These gentlemen were in the city for the purpose of viewing the Whitley Opera house, more particularly the stage appointments and scenery. Last evening the opera house was lighted, and they were shown through it, and expressed themselves as much pleased with the result of their inspection. The new opera house in Ottawa is about completed, and it was with a view to gaining some points as to scenery, etc., that these gentlemen visited Emporia. They were greatly pleased with the Whitley opera house stage scenery, and it is not unlikely that Mr. Tschudi, the artist, will secure a contract of the same at Ottawa” (page 3).
All the while, Tschudi continued to run a series of advertisements in local newspapers. Here are a few of note:
On July 27, 1882, the “Emporia Daily News” announced, “John Tschudi, the Whitley opera house scenic artist, sent a number of ornamental signs to Colorado yesterday.”
On July 29, 1882, Tschudi’s advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” stated, “Signs! Signs! —In Japanese, East Lake, Queen Anne, and Oriental styles by Tschudi, the artist. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store.”
By summer, Tschudi had customers placing orders at Moore’s Drug Store. An advertisement in the “Emporia Daily News” on July 29, 1882, announced “Let the work speak for itself,” is my motto, Tschudi, Artist, Fresco Decorator, Ornamental Painter, and Sign Writer. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” and “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s Drug Store” (page 4). Tschudi’s ads ran continuously until October 1882.
On Aug. 15, 1882, and the “Emporia Daily News” reported, “Why not have a neat sign when it costs you no more than a poor one? Tschudi, the artist, can guarantee you work and figures that cannot be beat. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (page 4).
His association with Moore’s drug store, meant that Tschudi needed someone to take orders, while he traveled for work. This ensured a constant stream of income when he returned from out-of-town projects. On Oct 18, 1882, “The Evening News” reported, “John Tschudi, the scenic artist, returned to-day from Wellington, where he has been painting the scenery for the new opera house at that place” (page 1). Despite his absences, Tschudi would advertise, “Remember that Tschudi, the artist, is still here, and will do you the highest and latest artistic style, and at bottom figures. Leave orders at Moore’s drug store” (Emporia Daily News, Oct 18, 1882, page 4). On Dec 21, 1882, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “Tschudi has made a large transparent street sign which will be placed in position soon and bear the letters ‘Ice cream and oysters.’ The same artist prepared the beautiful parlor screen upon whose surface are painted six different attractive designs in oil” (page 3).
By 1883, Tschudi was included in the Emporia Directory. Interestingly, his listing suggests pervious work in Tennessee, and not Wichita or Cincinnati: “Tschudi, John U., fr Tenn., ornamental frescoe scenic painting, and sign writer, shop 197 Commercial st, res same.” His wife was also listed in the directory at the same address. Marguerite began going by Margaret.
Painting projects for 1883 included G. T. Carlton’s Billiard Hall and Fithian’s Ice wagon in Emporia. On Feb 20, 1883, “The Evening News” reported, “Mr. G. T. Carlton to-day opened to the public his handsome new billiard parlor in the Soden building on Fifth Avenue. Tschudi. The artist has been busy for several weeks past frescoing the walls of the room and the result of his skillful hand is seen in the excellent effects he has produced…” (page 4).
On April 19, 1883, the “Emporia Weekly News” reported “A Thing of Beauty. Fithian’s ice wagon made its first trip for the season Thursday, and it attracted as much attention as a circus chariot as it rolled along the street resplendent in brilliant colors and decorations by the brush of Tschudi, the scenic artist. The arctic sketches on the sides are excellent works of art, and it will be refreshing to even look at them when the mercury begins to crawl up into the sky parlor of thermometer” (page 1).
However, he continued to paint stage scenery for a variety of venues throughout the region. On March 22, 1883, “The Emporia Weekly News” reported, “John Tschudi has received an order to paint a set of scenes for the Amateur Dramatic club of Newton” (page 4).
On May 17, 1883, “The Weekly News-Democrat” reported on the dedication of the Welsh Congregational Church on Merchants Street” (page 1). Of the new auditorium, the article reported that sections of ornamental plaster work were “artistically frescoed by Tschudi, the scenic artist, whose happy combination of complimentary colors and agreeable shades proclaim him an artist of superior merit…”
On October 19, 1883, the “Iola Register” reported, “Mr. J. N. Tschudi has been at work in the opera house all week and has made quite a change there. In addition to the business cards which adorn the front of the stage, Mr. Tschudi has been painting a new and elegant drop curtains which he expects to have ready by Saturday night. He has also made new and larger wings, to correspond with each scene, and before he leaves will paint the woodwork on the front of the stage. He expects to finish his work sometime next week, and the opera house will certainly ne much handsomer for his having been there” (page 5).
On Dec. 1, 1883, “The Humboldt Union” of Humboldt, Kansas, credited Tschudi with delivering scenery to the Germania Hall. The article reported, “The scenery [described in detail] and the arch of the stage is handsomely decorated. The artist, John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, has performed his work in first class style” (page 3).
As in the past, Tschudi was not working alone, nor was he simply hiring local amateurs. A variety of skilled personalities were working for Tschudi in Emporia, including Charles Stebbins. On May 2, 1883, “Emporia Daily News” and “Evening News” reported, “Charles Stebbins, who is employed by Tschudi, the artist and painter, has returned from Hartford, Michigan, where he recently fell heir to a legacy of $1,000” (page 1).
Tschudi began to secure an abundance of scenic work for stages throughout Kansas. On Jan 25, 1884, “The Weekly Kansas” of Independence reported, “Of all the improvements made during the past year in Independence there are none in which so much interest is felt as in the Opera House block erected by Mr. Payne….The stage is large and commodious, it being 24×66 feet, with four dressing rooms, and the footlights are fixed with a lever so they can be shut off or put in place at will. It will be supplied with good scenery. Mr. John Tschudi. The artist, is now here for that purpose. He comes highly recommended as a scenic painter. There will be thirteen sets of scenes and fifteen set scenes” (page 4). While working on a theater project, however, Tschudi would land a variety of other painting projects. Such was the case in Chanute, Kansas. On Aug. 28, 1884, the “Chanute Blade” of Chanute, Kansas reported, “The Chanute Bank is being neatly frescoed by John U. Tschudi, and will be one of the nicest finished rooms in the city when completed” (page 3).
Tschudi’s comings and goings were announced in a variety of small-town newspapers, making it easy to trace his travels. For example, On Oct. 16, 1884, “The Chanute Blade” reported, “John U. Tschudi went to Kansas City last Tuesday, to paint some new scenery and drop curtains at Kansas City. He painted two very beautiful scenes for Williams’ Hall in this city, last week. He will return here in about two weeks to paint the scenes and drop curtain for the new opera house now being erected here” (page 3). Tschudi was also working on the new stage setting for an opera house in Red Cloud, Nebraska. On October 16, 1885, the “Webster County Argus” of Red Cloud reported, “The proprietors of the opera house expect to have the same opened on Monday, the 26th inst. A good dramatic company has been engaged for the occasion. The house will be seated with six hundred chairs. Prof. Tschudi, the scenic artist, with a force of carpenters in making and placing the scenery, which will consist of eight complete settings, besides a handsome drop curtain.”
Sometime between the fall of 1885 and 1886, Tschudi moved to Kansas City, By 1887, he was associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. The firm’s offices were located in the Gillis Opera House.
The Gillis Opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.A photograph of the Gillis opera House in Kansas City, Missouri.
This is where it gets interesting, and a little confusing. Sosman & Landis Scenic Studio outfitted the Gillis, with L. L. Graham and W. P. Davis working as the scenic artists on the project, while representing the firm. Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis opened a branch office in Kansas City in 1884; it was headed by L. L. Graham. At the same time, Graham and Davis also operated a studio, known as Graham & Davis, frequently working as subcontractors for Sosman & Landis. Sosman & Landis’ work for the Gillis was well-known and mentioned in a variety of newspapers. For example, on April 21, 1887, “The Times” of Clay Center, Kansas, reported that Sosman & Landis had “fitted the Gillis Opera House, Kansas City, and the Grand at Topeka.” Graham’s Studio in Kansas City, the Kansas City Scenic Co. and Sosman & Landis’ scenic studio were not directly competing in the region, they were divvying up work and sharing artists. Even in 1888, Dunn was listed as not only a scenic artist at Graham’s Studio, but also on staff at the Kansas City Scenic Studio. By 1890, an new iteration of the Kansas City Scenic Co. opened, solely under the management of Dunn and J. C. Bronaugh. On July 13, 1891, the Kansas Patron commented that Bronaugh was “the traveling member of the Kansas City Scenic Co.” Bronaugh secured the contracts and Dunn painted the scenery. This new iteration of the firm still maintained a close business alliance with the Sosman & Landis until the 1920s.
In 1887, Kansas City Scenic Co. advertisements list J. U. Tschudi, B. F. Dunn, C. A. Oldham and C. J. Lorella. On March 22, 1887, the “Wichita Star” reported “A reporter was shown the number of samples from scenic-artist work from the brush of Kansas City Scenic-Artist company, in which company figures, as an artist, Mr. J. W. Tschudi, formerly of the city. The work is artistic and ranges throughout the entire term of scenic work. Landscapes, rocky passes, woods, streets, palaces, parlors, chambers, kitchens, hovels – in fact every known term of scenic effects were painted in the highest style of art. The JOURNAL congratulates Mr. Tschudi on the excellent work of the firm in which his brush is prominent” (page 4).
On June 16, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” of Little River, Kansas, reported, “The carpenters’ work on the new opera hall is going on at a lively rate, Canfield & Co. are doing the work in good shape. Messrs. Tschudi, Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job.” On June 18, 1887, “The Little River Monitor” reported, “Messrs. Tschudi Dunn and Oldham, of the Kansas City Scenic company, are painting a set of scenes for the hall, and are doing a fine job. The mammoth drop curtain is a beauty. It is ornamented with the business cards of our merchants and others and will be first class in every particular.”
On May 20, 1887, “The Lyons Daily Democrat” in Lyons, Kansas, reported, “Mess. Tschudi, Dunn, and Oldham, scenic artists from Kansas City, are preparing a very fine new drop curtain for Tom’s Butler’s Opera House. Tom very properly thinks the public would be pleased to have a brand new curtain to gaze at between acts. The gentlemen represent a firm of scenic artists who are furnishing many of the finest Opera Houses in Kansas with stage settings, and our citizens must admit, when their work is first shown, they understand their business thoroughly and are first-class artists in every respect. They will furnish scenery for the fine new opera house at Wichita, and when Lyon’s new Opera House looms up, they will probably again have an opportunity to display their artistic powers” (page 3).
On October 22, 1887, “The Caldwell News” of Caldwell, Kansas, reported, “Judge J. G. Woods is now moving into his new building this week. The lower story is occupied by the Woods bank, This room is elegantly fitted up in solid walnut. The south room is occupied by C. E. Flaudro’s clothing house. The opera house occupies the second story. It is the same size as the Crawford Opera House at Topeka. The stage is 50 feet wide and 25 feet deep and is furnished with fifteen complete sets of scenery including an elegant drop curtain painted by the artist John U. Tschudi…” (page 1) [reprinted on Oct 12, 1922, p 1].
On Dec. 1, 1887, “The Kingman Courier” reported, “Prof. John W. Tschudi, of Kansas City, will have completed the scenic work at Garfield Opera House by the 6th of December. The scenes painted by this talented artist display true genius, combined with the highest-class conceptions of the true and beautiful. When completed the Garfield Opera house will surpass anything of a similar character in Kansas” (page 6).
Tschudi also painted scenery for the Garfield Opera House in Kingman, Kansas. The time he was traveling with a stage mechanic named Mr. Foreman. On Dec. 7, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Tschudi, the scenic artist, and Foreman, the stage builder of the Garfield Opera House, will be given a benefit by the amateurs of Kingman Saturday night. They are worthy gentlemen and the entertainment in their interest should be ell attended” (page 3). On
On Dec. 12, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported “Messrs. Tschudi & Foreman desire to return their sincere thanks to the ladies and gentlemen who so kindly assisted at their benefit on Saturday evening last and thereby insured its success, And they also hope that those who by their presence graced the auditorium enjoyed a peasant evening” (page 3).
Dec. 22, 1887, “The Kingman Daily Courier” reported, “Prof. John Tschudi, artist at the Garfield Opera House, will pass the holidays with his family at Kansas City” (page 3). This indicates that Tschudi moved his family from Emporia to Kansas City when he became associated with the Kansas City Scenic Co. in 1887.
By 1888, Tschudi had left the Kansas City Scenic Co. and had established Tschudi, Loffing, & Roberts at 400 East 12th in Kansas City. His new business partners were Albert Roberts and Antoine Loffing. Tschudi’s residential address was listed as R. 1731 Walnut.
On Feb. 1, 1888, “The Kingman Daily Courier” of Kingman, Kansas, reported, “Prof. Tschudi is, beyond all doubt, the thorough, classical scenic artist in Kansas. His fine conceptions of mountain and sea, of glen and valley, of hill and dell, when spread upon canvass by his deft hand, are gems of beauty on which the eye fondly hangs. The COURIER heartily commends Prof. Tschudi to the managers of the Greensburg Opera House.” (page 5).
The Tschudi’s relocated to Omaha, Nebraska, by 1890. Tschudi is working as the scenic artist at the Eden Musee, living at 1108 Farnam. Interestingly, John S. Tschudi, artist, also listed 1108 Farnam as his address for 1890 and 1891. This may be a double listing, or John S. is actually Tschudi Jr.’s son, John Fohrman; the baby that was born out of wedlock and raised by maternal grandparents, Clara and Michael Fohrman. By 1890, John is over 21 years old. It is very possible that he reunited with his biological father and began working as an artist. The Tschudi Family continued live in Omaha, with Tschudi’s daughters also securing employment.
The 1892 Omaha Directory listed:
Tschudi John S, scenic artist Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th
Tschudi Lucy Miss, folder O Ptg Co, res 612 S 18th
Tschudi Minnie, candy stand Eden Musee, res. 612 S 18th
The 1893 Omaha Directory listed:
Tschudi John U, scenic artist, Wonderland, res. 612 S 18th
Tschudi Lucy, clk Candy stand Wonderland, bds 612 S 18th
Miss Minnie, folder Klopp & Bartlett Co., res 612 S 18th
Tschudi’s 1892 connection with Eden Musee also makes Indiana’s newspapers. On Jan 25, 1893, “The Indianapolis News” reported, “No Chance for an Eden Musee. For two weeks past T. U. Tschudi, a scenic artist, who has been in the museum business for some years, and Mme. L. Brouillard have been staying at the Circle Park Hotel. Together they have been looking for a suitable building in which to start Eden Musee in New York. The only building in the city that seemed available was the Speigel & Thomas building on Washington street, but Mr. Tschudi was unable to agree on the amount of security that he should give for the lease, and could not make a satisfactory arrangement with the owner” (page 2).
This particular moment signals a shift for Tschudi Jr. and his family, possibly indicating a temporary separation from his wife. His family returns to Kansas City where Tschudi rejoins them in 1897.
During the mid-1890s, Tschudi Jr. heads east, traveling throughout Indiana and Kentucky.
On Aug. 28, 1895, the “Richmond Item” of Richmond, Indiana, reported, “Beautiful Scenery. The Phillips Opera House Greatly Improved and There will be a pleasing surprise to those who attend ton-night. Manager Dobbins has not been idle this summer. He has one of the country’s finest scenic artists at work in the Phillips Opera House for several months, and to day there is completed one of the most elaborate outfits of scenery to be found in the state. Artist Tschudi’s taste in this line of work is not to be equaled, and he has painted thirteen beautiful sets of scenery for the theatre, which must be seen to be properly appreciated. Last night a display was made of new property, and the few persons who were given special invitations to be present were more than delighted. There is nothing which adds more to the enjoyment of first-class performance than appropriate scenic effects and this year the patrons of the Phillips will find that all stage settings will be elaborate. Besides this plentiful supply of new scenery Manager Dobbins has gone further. Another new drop curtain has been painted by Mr. Tschudi, and it is a rare specimen of his artistic skill. The big curtain is rich in its coloring, and almost perfect in its execution. The central figure is a splendid reproduction of Turner’s celebrated painting of “The Harbor in Venice,” and it is a picture the eye does not tire to look upon. The stage of the Phillips, which is one of the largest in the state, has been thoroughly renovated and painted and it presents a neat and clean appearance. The entire auditorium will be re-frescoed within a few days, this portion of the work not having yet been completed. The opera house is now in better trim than ever before and the patrons who are in attendance at the opening this evening will not be long in distinguishing this fact” (page 3).
On Aug 24, 1895, “The Richmond item” reported, “Almost finished. Scenic artist Tschudi who has been in Richmond all summer will still be ‘one of us’ for a considerable time. His work of painting the Phillips opera house scenery will be finished next week and then he will begin work at the Grand. Mr. Bradley has given him the contract to paint the entire set of new scenery which will be of the finest and it is probable that he will get started on the work the last of next week” (page 1).
On Sept. 5, 1895, “The Richmond Item” reported, “The plasterers will soon be at work on the opera house. Scenic artist Tschudi has his scaffolding all arranged for painting the scenery for the Grand theatre” (page 4).
Tschudi was still in Richmond at the beginning of 1896. On Feb 26, 1896, “The Richmond Item” reported, “An Item reporter visited the room of Prof. Tschudi, the artist, this morning and took a hasty inspection of a number of his water-color paintings which are to be exhibited the remainder of the week. The collection represents about four years’ work, and some of the pictures re original while others are copies from celebrated paintings. Arranged as they will be at Stigleman’s studio, they certainly will be well worth the inspection of the people, whether they contemplate purchasing or not” (page 4).
In the same newspaper, Tschudi’s name popped up in a court case: “In ‘Squire Jessup’s court a judgement has been rendered against John U. Tschudi for $16 in favor of J. H. Dobbins. The suit was on account.” Whether this signaled a financial downturn or something else, Tschudi soon left town.
By summer, he was working in Lexington, Kentucky. On July 13, 1896, the “Lexington Herald-Leader” reported:
“Magnificent.
Will be Lexington’s Opera House this season.
Scenic artist Tschudi Now Hard at Work. How House will appear.
Everything is business and bustle at the Lexington Opera House, and when the coming theatrical season opens the citizens of Lexington will see one of the handsomest interior of a theatre in the country. Manager Scott will spare neither time or expense in refitting and refurbishing his house. The scenic artist, Mr. J. U. Tschudi, of Chicago, assisted by the old reliable John Uttinger, is already hard at work and has completed a number of handsome places. None of the old scenery will be used, but everything on the stage will be brand new. There will be sixteen new sets, all beautiful and fresh. The new drop curtain is going to be one of the very handsomest in the country, as Mr. Tschudi told a Leader reporter this morning that he was going to try his hand on this especial piece of work and make it guilt edge, so that our theatre goers can expect something beautiful. The work already completed by Mr. Tschudi is magnificent and shows him to be an artist of high rank. Redecorating the auditorium of the Opera House will be commenced at once, as the scaffold is now being erected for the frescoe painters” (page 5).
It was in Lexington, that Tschudi received what may have been the greatest publicity of his career. There were two extensive articles about Tschudi that I am sharing in their entirety. The first was published on Aug. 15, 1896, in “The Daily Leader” of Lexington, Kentucky (page 3). Again, not everything adds up.
“Mr. J. R. Tschudi who painted the New Opera House Drop Curtain.
An artist of some fame.
J. W. Tschudi, of Chicago, the famous scenic artist who has just completed the scenery and the magnificent drop curtain of out Opera House, was born in Switzerland (the land of William Tell) in 1852, and emigrated to America with his parents in 1857, and from childhood, was fond of painting and drawing. While at school he very often got punished for drawing cartoon on his slate, which kept the scholars laughing. After his school days he studied with his father and assisted him with his work and soon developed such an artistic taste in landscape painting that the father concluded in 1868 to send him back to France to finish his studies. ‘After five years,’ says Mr. Tschudi, ‘I returned to America and took a fancy to large work and consequently went to theatrical scene painting, and have since that time worked in many of the finest theaters both in this country and abroad. My father was a famous fresco artist (in relief); he studied under the old masters in France for ten years. His work can be seen in France, Italy, Switzerland and America at the present time. He died in his 69th year in 1886 in New York.’ Mr. Tschudi is an extensive traveler and had been to all the principal parts of the world. The Leader called on him at the Opera House yesterday, and was shown a beautiful collection of sketches and paintings from all parts of the globe. The artist’s works both in oil and water color, but the last three years there has been no sale for oil paintings, and he has devoted his time entirely to water colors. He says he will give the people of Lexington an exhibition of water color paintings at one of the prominent down-town stores. Mr. Tschudi has been frequently asked why he did not change the spelling of his name, so it would be easily pronounced. He simply answers; “I have no reason to be ashamed of it, as it is famous in Swiss history, being the name of one of the oldest royal families on record, and was borne by artists, generals and men of high rank, and at the present time there are a number of recognized artists in the family. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington until October painting twelve sets of scenery for the new Parkersburg W. Va., theater, which opens about the middle of that month” (page 3).
Another article published in Lexington’s “The Daily Leader” on Aug. 24, 1896, described Tschudi’s scenic art process. I am including the article in its entirety, as this is a wealth of information for future generations:
“Scenery,
And how it is painted by the Theatre Scenic Artist.
Mr. Tschudi Tells the Leader Some of its Mysteries.
Painting a drop curtain.
How the immense canvas is stretched for the work.
A scenic artist’s life a hard one at times.
Mixing paints in buckets.
Few people are acquainted with that part of theater commonly referred to a ‘back of the scenes,’ and fewer persons have a well-defined idea of how scenery for a modern playhouse is painted. A Leader man recently called upon Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who has been busily engaged in painting new scenery for the Lexington Opera House and who is now engaged in painting some for a theater soon to be opened in Parksburg, W. Va. Mr. Tschudi has remained in Lexington to do his work as the facilities here are the very best, and then he has become conveniently settled and likes Lexington. Mr. Tschudi’s drop curtain painted for the Lexington Opera House some weeks ago is certainly a thing of beauty, a masterpiece of scenic art, and has called forth expressions of extreme admiration from all who have seen it. Personally, Mr. Tschudi is a charming man to converse with, always interested in his work and ever ready and willing to impart that interest to others. To the question, ‘where were you born,’ put by the Leader man, Mr. Tschudi said, “I was born in Switzerland in 1852, but am an American artist. I came to the United States in 1857. My father was an artist in France and I, only one of eight children, am an artist. I was fond of it from childhood. When I was a boy, I sometimes got punished for drawing comic sketches on the walls, and I would neglect my lessons to draw those pictures and frequently get kept in school on that account.’
‘Tell me something, Mr. Tschudi about the scenic artist.’
‘The scenic artists,’ said he, ‘do not wear long hair and work with a palette and brushes as most people imagine. He is an ordinary looking man, pleasant in his conversation, and if you see him at work on the paint bridge, you will see him dressed in a neat suit of white overalls and jacket, surrounded by buckets, tomato cans, tin cups, etc. containing the various tints and colors and brushes, some of them as large as our whitewashers use Every large theatre, such as the one here in Lexington, which is well up to the average in modern equipment, is provided with a paint bridge and frame of enormous size. The paint bridge is built at the back wall of the stage, reaching from one fly gallery to the other, all the way from twenty to forty feet above the stage floor, according to the height of the stage, and ranges from four to six feet in width. Between the bridge and the wall there is a paint frame, reaching from one end of the bridge to the other and ranging from 20 by 30 to 40 by 60 feet. Looking at this frame you would think it impossible to move it because of its enormous size and weight, but when you hear the artist say, “Let’er down or up Charley (Charley is the artist’s helper or paint boy) you will see Charley go to the end of the bridge where there is a windlass, take hold with one hand or turn it and the frame is moved up or down as the artist wishes.
‘It may seem strange to you that this paint boy can with ease turn the crank and raise or lower the 40 by 60 feet frame which alone weighs half a ton without the scene that may be on it, also mounted as you see it when finished. However, it is very simple, this monster being hung precisely as a window sash is hung in your house. There is a counterweight attached that balances the frame, and instead of pushing it up like you would a sash, the paint boy turns the crank, and she goes up or down. So, you see, the artist stands on the stationary bridge and can paint a scene by 40 by 60 feet without having to climb up or down a scaffold as you may imagine on seeing some of the enormous scenes in large theaters in cities.
How the artist works.
‘Now, if you will follow, I’ll tell you how the artist works. Stretched on this frame here is, as you see, a canvas 24 by 30 feet, and ‘sized’ as the artist calls it. That is, ready to paint on. With this piece of charcoal tied to a stick, which, I suppose, is about five feet in length. He commences to sketch or outline a scene, which, by the way, is a puzzle to make out at first. Presently, after having mixed all of his colors in his buckets, cans, etc., you will see him apply the colors with large brushes, giving a slap and a dab of color here and there, and before you realize what he is trying to do, you will see the bright sunny sky, the distant hills, the rippling brook, the foliage of trees, and each appear and gradually grow as if by magic until there is a beautiful and finished landscape before you.
‘And all to aid the work of the players,’ suggested the Leader man.
‘Yes, indeed, without the scenic painter’s brush what would the play amount to? The scenic effects carry the principal productions of the present day, as you know.
‘Yes, it was pretty hard at times on the artist, still we had times when we were in not rushed, as some of the scenery which we called stock, such as wood scene, modern street, kitchen, prison, plain, chamber, garden and landscape could be used in some of the modern plays. Sometimes we would have it very easy for a week or two and then again it would be a case of rush.
Artist in a rush.
‘I remember one instance in particular, while getting up the scenery for the Coleen Bawn, there was a tremendous amount of all special scenery to get up. The play was to be put on Monday afternoon matinee. On Saturday night I found myself way behind with the work. The manager came to me, excited and said: ‘Mr. Tschudi, you have been with us for six years and always ready when the time came. By heaven, I am afraid you will not get through in time.’ I said, ‘I never mind, there is lots of time between now and 2 o’clock on Monday, and I will get here just the same.’ I went on the paint bridge Saturday evening after supper and never left until Monday at 11:30, when I had all the scenery finished. It was pronounced by the manager and public as being the grandest production of the Colleen Bawn that had ever been staged. It was pretty hard on me. I went to bed after dinner Monday and slept until Tuesday at 9 o’clock a.m. There are, however, more pleasant things in an artist’s life. Our work is not a burden, it is a life’s study and a pleasure, and I may say I love it. It is the artist who dazzles and deceives the eye and carries you imagination to every part of the globe. When you witness the grand spectacular production, for if you would take the scenic effects away it would be like taking the feathers from the peacock. The bird would be left, but its glory would be gone. Mr. Tschudi will remain in Lexington several weeks while finishing up his work for the Parksburg theater. He may open a temporary studio in Lexington while here, where he will exhibit some of his studies in water colors. A display of his work can now be seen in the show windows of Brower, Scott & Frazee, and they have attracted considerable attention since being put there a few days ago.” (page 3).
By 1897, Tschudi was again listed in the Kansas City Directory, living with his family at 10 East 16th St. His son, also going by John Tschudi, was living with him. He and his son soon had embarked upon a new adventure, traveling with a new form of entertainment – Edison’s warograph. On Dec. 2, 1898, the “Keytesville Chariton Courier” of Keytsville, Missouri, reported, “The Messrs. Tschudi of the ‘War Graphic Co.’ exhibited their moving pictures at Dickenson’s hall, Tuesday evening. The entertainment was well attended, and the illustrations were both instructive and amusing” (page 8). For clarity, this was a moving picture show.
Two years later, Tschudi was still promoting the warograph. On Sept. 18, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” of Newton, Kansas, reported, J. U. Tschudi, with the warograph, who will give war pictures every night at some corner on Main street on a monster screen.”
On Oct. 2, 1899, “The Evening Kansan-Republican” went into detail about the attraction in an article entitled, “Warograph in Black Tent.” The article described:
“A very interesting attraction for this week will be the Warograph exhibition in the black tent. This exhibition presents life and action nearly all the battles fought in Cuba and the Phillipines. There you will see the charge of the Rough Riders, battle at San Juan Hill, Evacuation of Havana, Grand Parade of troops at Camp Alger, Destruction of Cevera’s fleet, the Kansas boys fighting before the trenches at Candabar and many other interesting scenes.” The article then quote the Hastings, Nebraska, Republican: “No attraction has commanded a greater patronage nor received more complimentary words than Edison’s Moving War Scenes. This feature of the carnivals has been a ‘hit’ and is certainly worthy of the good words and patronage it has been daily received. It is worth several times the price of admission charged and it is one of the attractive features at the Greater American Exposition at Omaha. The men conducting it are all affable and courteous gentlemen” (page 4).
On Oct. 3, 1899, “The Evening Kansas Republican” published a testimonial about Tschudi’s popular warograph attraction: “Don Kinney received a letter yesterday from E. D. Kipp, a friend of his in Marshal, Mo., who wrote from Fort Scott as follows: ‘I am here looking for attractions and find that your town and Fort Scott have the most of them. The Warograph, handled by J. H. Tschudi, is first class and I can highly recommend it” (page 1).
By 1900, the Tschudi family was living at 2631 Holmes. The household included John Ulrich Tschudi, Marguerite Tschudi, son John Tschudi, and daughter Lucy Tschudi. Their second daughter, Minnie Lillian was no longer part of the household, having married James Edward Brady in 1893. The Brady’s also lived in Kansas City.
Tschudi was still traveling with his warograph. On September 11 and 13, 1900, the “Sedalia Sentinel” of Sedalia, Kansas, published the following article:
“The Pictures are Here.
Splendid Scenes from the Boer War a feature.
Mr. J. U. Tschudi, who was here last year with the warograph pictures in the Ilgenfritz building on Ohio street, returns for the street fair again this year, with a much finer apparatus and a lot of new and interesting pictures, among which are fine views of the Boer war. His location is the leader building, opposite the court house on Ohio street. This is the best and cleanest show going for old and young, and the reputation Mr. Tschudi left last year insures him a splendid patronage. Open day and night” (page 1).
Tschudi traveled all over the country with his entertainment, yet still completed a variety of painting project. On Dec. 27, 1900, the “El Paso Herald” reported, “J. W. Tschudi, the scenic artist, arrived in the city with his wife this morning and will remain here until the carnival week. He has had a great deal of experience in decorating floats and his services can be secured by those who wish to put out floats and have not made arrangements” (page 5). He was in town for the live stock exhibit and parade the morning of the 18th].
By 1910, Tschudi had relocated to St. Louis, Missouri; his family remained in Kansas City. Tschudi now lived by himself, listed as an artist and residing at 726 S 2nd Street, St. Louis. The 1910 census report listed him as a widower. The same census report listed his wife as married.
Tschudi’s son and wife continue to live together on Holmes Street in Kansas City for the next two decades, although they moved from 2631 Holmes to 2751 Holmes. Tschudi’s son returned to using his adoptive name – John Fohrman. The 1910 Census listed Fohrman’s occupation as an artist in the Scenic Co. industry. He continued to work as a scenic artist until his passing, frequently working for the Kansas City Scenic Co. Nothing really changed for Fohrman or his mother until 1928. On October 13, 1928, Fohrman married Florence Lee Smith; Smith lived just down the street at 2709 Holmes. Marguerite continued to live with her son until 1931, when she passed. Her obituary made no mention of any former husband:
“TSCHUDI – Mrs. Marguerite Tschudi, 81 years old, died last night at the home of her son, John Fohrman, 2751 Holmes Street. Mrs. Tschudi was born in Luxemburg and came to Kansas City from Europe in 1885. Also surviving are a daughter, Mrs. Lucy Armbruster, wife of Benjamin G. Armbruster of the advertising department, Harris-Goar Company, who lives at 2711 Holmes street; a brother, John Merkes, Dubuque, Iowa and a sister, Mrs. Anna Miller, St. Louis.” It appears that Marguerite altered a little of her own history too– or it was an honest misprint.
After his mother’s passing in 1931, John and Florence Fohrman relocated west to California, settling in Los Angeles. In 1946, they moved to Culver City. Fohrman passed away on Jan 29, 1952. His obituary announced:
“John Joseph Fohrman Rites Set Tomorrow.
Services will be held tomorrow at 11 a.m. at the chapel of Smith & Salsbury for John Joseph Fohrman, 83, of 4208 Lafayette, who died Wednesday morning. He leaves his widow, Florence, and a daughter Lucia Fohrman. Born in Chicago, he had lived in Culver City for six years. He was a scenic artist. Rev. Eldred Charles, of the Cardiff Avenue Christian Church, will officiate. The remains will be cremated.”
In regard to the passing of his father, John Ulrich Tschudi, Jr.; Tschudi never left St. Louis. His career began to fade away, and his name no longer made headlines. Until his passing in 1921, Tschudi continued to work as an artist and live at South Second Street. His death certificate listed that he was 70 yrs. old, an artist, and a widower. Tschudi passed away at 614 N. 2nd in St. Louis, His death certificate listed his parents as John Tschudi and Margaretha Egli – both born in Switzerland. The informant listed on Tschudi’s death certificate was Wm Deven. A small note at the bottom indicates that he was buried in Kansas City. I have yet to locate his grave.
Seven years prior to Tschudi’s passing, he painted “Early Days on the Mississippi.” This may be his only extant painting, as I am unable to locate any other easel artworks by Tschudi;. “Early Days on the Mississippi” may be Tschudi’s sole artistic legacy; the only artwork that marks the life and career of John Ulrich Tschud, Jr.
However, it is the 1914 date and the Mississippi subject matter that is also significant.
In 1914, St. Louis commemorated the 150th anniversary of its founding; as part of the celebration, the City commissioned a two-part civic spectacle. The Pageant and Masque of Saint Louis was presented on the slop of Art Hill in Forest Park from May 28 to June 1, 1914. The pageant used an enormous stage built on pilings in the Grand Basin, measuring over 500 ft. wide and 200 ft. deep. The pageant featured a cast of 7500 volunteers. Some records suggest that there were 75,000 people in attendance on opening night. Three hundred years of local history were presented over the course of five hours, including many scenes from early years on the Mississippi River. Many historic photographs of this spectacle remain, depicting the incredible grandeur of the event. Some are digitally accessible through the St. Louis Public Library as part of the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis Collection.
I firmly believe that Tschudi’s painting was one of many, commissioned advertise the event; advertisements that depicted various scenes from the pageant. This is why the edges of Tschudi’s painting are hemmed, include a painted frame, and title. This artwork was intended to be tacked to a wall, as any advertisement. This painted composition was most likely part of a series depicting significant historical events reenacted at the Pageant and Masque of St. Louis in 1914.
I congratulate the Kimmswick Historical Society’s decision to invest in the preservation of Tschudi’s artwork for many future generations to come.
My recent scenery restoration project at the Louisville Scottish Rite Theater began three years ago in 2019. These projects are often years in the making, and it really takes the right person to set the ball in motion. I have watched scenery collections crumble from both indecision and poor stewardship. Time is often of the essence when historic scenes start to fail. Scenery that survived decades against an upstage wall can rapidly deteriorate over the course of a few years if the conditions are right.
My initial visit to the Louisville Scottish Rite was a side trip while attending USITT (United States Institute of Theatre Technology). Whenever I attend the annual conference, I try and schedule a visit to a nearby Scottish Rite theatre or historic opera house. These side trips provide me with an opportunity to learn and document “just one more” scenery collection.
Visiting the Louisville Scottish Rite during the USITT conference in 2019.The Louisville Scottish Rite Auditorium.The Louisville Scottish Rite.
The only day that I could photograph Masonic scenery while attending USITT in 2019 was on Wednesday, March 20. Preparations for the Scottish Rite reunion were scheduled to start the next day. I had from 9AM to 3PM to document as much as possible and make my way back to the convention center for a meeting.
I must have made an impression, as the Louisville Scottish Rite hired me that fall to assess the collection. I was contracted to compile condition reports, historic analyses, and replacement appraisals for each drop in the collection. My documents that December were so well-received that I was asked to visit Louisville and present my findings at a special event.
The Egyptian Setting for the 31st degree was one of six settings featured during my presentation on March 7, 2020.
On March 7, 2020, I was the guest speaker for Family night at the Louisville Scottish Rite. I gave a presentation about their historic scenery collection, tracing the history of Masonic scenery in the United States and placing the Louisville Scottish Rite scenery collection withing the context of American theater. At the time I was also asked to work as an historical consultant for upcoming interior renovations throughout the building. After speaking at the Scottish Rite in Louisville in March 2020, the pandemic put everything on hold.
March 2020 – May 2022
Eventually, I lost touch with the Louisville Scottish Rite and moved onto other projects, yet the Louisville Scottish Rite scenery collection continued to lurk in the back of my mind. Surprisingly, Randolph Starks, Secretary of the Louisville Scottish Rite, reached out again last spring. On May 2, 2022, I received the following text: “Hi Wendy. It has been a very long time since we spoke, but I have enjoyed seeing your Facebook posts, the reports of your travels, and the images of your beautiful artwork. I would like to renew our conversation about you providing advice and guidance on some renovation and painting of our Scottish Rite temple. Let me know when you would be available to schedule a phone call to discuss this.” I received this on the same day that my mother went into the ER, so our conversation was again placed on hold for a few more months.
Stark contacted me again on June 29, 2022, but for another reason.
I received a series of pictures of the Egyptian cut drop, with the text message, “Hi Wendy. We just discovered this damage to this scenery drop today. I don’t know how it happened. I would like to know if it would be possible to repair and restore it.”
Damage to the Egyptian Cut Drop at theLouisville Scottish Rite.Damage to the Egyptian Cut Drop at theLouisville Scottish Rite.
My response was, “Yes. You will need to take the drop down, or damage will continue- I am mid-project, but can chat tomorrow afternoon.” Realistically, I was in no position to take on another project and knew that I would have to mostly advise from afar. Starks gathered a team to lower the drop, and I then directed its preparation for short-term storage, until I could travel to Louisville that fall. We tentatively scheduled my visit for November. I would not only repair the scene, but also advise on some upcoming interior renovations. I was also scheduled to again speak about the history of the Louisville Scottish Rite scenery (another Masonic event on Nov. 10, 2022).
Repairing the Egyptian Cut Drop
Unfortunately, there were a series of obstacles to overcome before rolling and storing the cut drop to await my future repairs. The first obstacle was removing wood from the backside, as several “stiffeners” were glued to the cut edge. Many cut drop openings without netting for support curl over time. As a preventative measure, some scenic studios attached wood stiffeners upon installation. These stiffeners were frequently thin strips of pine that were secured to the drop with a strip of glued muslin. Removing an original stiffener is often simple, as the fabric and wood easily peel off of the fabric.
Over the decades, Masonic stage crews tried to replicate this technique. Unfortunately, instead of using thin strips of light-weight pine, they improvised, using a variety of hard woods and solvent-based or inappropriate adhesives. Over the years I have encountered oak strips attached with contact cement (Wichita, KS), lathe attached with wood glue (Fort Scott, KS), yard sticks attached with plaster of paris (Fargo, ND), just to name a few.
Patch on a cut drop at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Fargo, North Dakota.
In Louisville, however, an enterprising Mason opted for a black substance that looks like coal-tar pitch; this was a new one to me.
Photograph sent to me by Jordan Morgan, showing stiffeners attached with a black adhesive.Wood attached to the backside of many cut drops at the Louisville Scottish Rite.
In addition to the stiffeners, ¼”-thick black flexible foam was secured to all of the cut edges with spray adhesive. Sadly, I have encountered this before too, at the Scottish Rite in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Although it works in the short term, it wreaks havoc when repairs need to occur. In Louisville, a solvent-based spray adhesive was used, partially melting the foam and permanently affixing it to the backside of the drop.
Removing the flexible foam from the Egyptian cut drop.
And there was one more thing…
The original netting in the cut opening was replaced with plastic netting that was hot glued on.
Plastic netting attached with hot melt glued, placed over original cotton netting.
Although I feel like a broken record, constantly repeating myself, here goes…NEVER use hot melt glue on historic stage scenery. Hot melt glue has no place in historic preservation, as it severely damages fragile fabric, embedding itself in the fabric’s fibers. Often the hot melt glue is even visible from the front, marring a once beautifully painted composition. Attaching anything to historic scenery with hot-melt glue makes the repair irreversible and flammable. It is especially unfortunate if the new netting is plastic or poorly positioned in the cut opening. Both were the cases with the Egyptian cut drop at the Louisville Scottish Rite. When conducting the initial examination of the scenery, I recognized that the plastic netting would have to remain, as there was so much hot melt glue applied to the fabric that it is now permanently affixed to the cut drop.
The stiffeners, foam, and plastic netting prohibited any expedient storage of the scene last summer until my fall arrival. Fortunately, one diligent Masonic volunteer, Jordan Morgan, spent over thirty-hours removing both foam and wood. Despite his diligence, some areas were left for me to deal with once on site. As I expected, removing the foam and stiffeners could not occur without damage to the painting and fabric. Some of the foam remains firmly adhered to the cut drop.
Egyptian cut drop with flexible foam around cut openings.Removing the flexible foam.
My trip to repair the scenery was slotted for November. During my stay, I would not only fix the damage to the cut drop, but again speak as a guest lecturer and continued to function as a historical consultant for a few anticipated interior renovations.
On the afternoon of Nov 8, 2022, my plane touched down and I was off to the races. This was well after casting my vote at 7AM; it was election day, and I was thankful that the Minnesota polls open so early. After renting a car, checking into my hotel, changing into work clothes, and driving to the Scottish Rite, I began the slow process of setting up the workspace. Once everything was set, I carefully unrolled the damaged cut drop and assessed the damage, simultaneously planning my attack. Despite the dozens of pictures that were sent, nothing replaces examining the damage in person. I went to bed that night, weighing the pros and cons of various approaches to the damage.
The Egyptian cut drop on the stage at the Louisville Scottish Rite.Beginning the repair
Arriving at the Scottish Rite the next morning, I met my onsite assistant, Jordan, and we began the painstaking process of cleaning both the cut drop. This is necessary before any fabric repair.
Cleaning the backside of the fabric prior to repair.
I focused on the biggest damage, before tackling the dozens of small punctures. By midmorning, I realized that the project would go far beyond patching visible damage. I had to do some preventative care – placing vertical reinforcement strips on every seam and weak area. The culprit of the anticipated damage? Flame retardant.
Split seams caused from repeated applications of flame retardant over the decades.
A repeated application of flame retardant often causes the greatest damage to historic scenery; it is like giving the drop cancer. Applying different flame retardants over the decades creates a toxic environment for the fabric and the very fibers begin to break down. Therefore, I need to help support the fabric so that the weight of the fabric will not cause stress that results in tears.
Now, I was dealing with a few different problems. The central portion of the drop is much older than the top and the bottom; the oldest portion dating from the previous building, c. 1910. Toomey & Volland Scenic Studio records indicate that scenery was delivered to the Louisville Scottish Rite in 1910.
Original fabric (below) and fabric extensions (above) added in the 1920s.Original fabric (below) and fabric extensions (above) added in the 1920s.
These drops were later refurbished, enlarged, and installed in the current building during 1923. Over the years, there have been several alterations made to the collection. Initially, the top sandwich batten was removed and replaced with jute webbing and ties lines. This likely occurred when the 1910 scenery was refurbished and moved into the new building. The first-generation bottom sandwich battens were replaced with pipe pockets at this time too.
Flexible black foam attached to the cut edge with spray adhesive.
However, over time, as the pipe pockets failed, ripping off, second-generation pipe pockets were added, the latest being thick, clear plastic that was glued to the back.
Plastic pipe pocket glued to the back of a Louisville Scottish Rite backdrop.
Additional scenery was purchased from Volland Studios between 1951 and 1952, then again in 1968.
Additional repairs, fabric reinforcements and attempts to consolidate loose pigment occurred continuously over the decades. For example, olive green edging (similar to a coarse bias tape) was sewn onto the offstage edges. This was an early attempt to prevent tearing from contact. Although this has prevented some damage and deterioration, the actual sewing greatly damaged the painted surface and has weakened the fabric over time. Other drops have large pieces of mesh glued to the entire back, possibly an attempt to prevent rips. However, the added weight is now jeopardizing the top of each scene.
Mesh glued to some of the backdrops at the Louisville Scottish Rite.
Over the course of three days we cleaned, patched, and reinforced the fabric of the Egyptian cut drop. Paint touch-up of visible patches will occur on my return. I only transport my distemper palette by ground, and therefore will drive on my next trip.
On the morning of Nov. 12 (my fourth day), I supervised the hanging of the repaired cut drop. Everything looked perfect!
Front view – the repaired cut drop.The repaired cut drop, as viewed from behind.Details of repaired damage. Egyptian Cut Drop. Repair work Completed from Nov. 8-12, 2022.
I then assessed the remainder of the collection and began planning for the complete preservation of the entire collection.
Painted detail from another Louisville Scottish Rite scene.
By the afternoon I was on my way home, only 96 hours after my arrival. It was an action-packed trip that I have yet to recover from.
In regard to the history of the Louisville Scottish Rite scenery, my research indicated that Kentucky may have been the earliest state in the Southern Jurisdiction to use stage scenery for their degree work. Here is an excerpt from the document that I submitted in 2019 as it helps frame the significance of the scenery collection and my restoration project.
“The History of Degree Productions at the Louisville Scottish Rite.
Scottish Rite Valley’s bordering the geographical demarcation between the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction were experimenting with stages in Masonic Halls and common lodge room long before the first “official” Scottish Rite theater was constructed in the Southern Jurisdiction, c. 1890s. The earliest Scottish Rite stages frequently referenced in the Southern Jurisdiction are Little Rock, Arkansas and Oakland, California in 1896. Theatrical staging of degree work in Louisville, Kentucky, may have predated these two Valleys, signifying the inclusion of the earliest Masonic stage settings in the Southern Jurisdiction.
The Wilkes-Barre Times of Pennsylvania, the Arizona Daily Star of Tucson, and the Akron Beacon Journal of Ohio all published the following article in 1895:
“BIG SCOTTISH RITE DEDICATION. Louisville, Ky., Oct. 15 – The Scottish Rite Cathedral of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, at Sixth and Walnut street was dedicated today. This dedication surpassed anything ever seen in Masonic ceremonies in this city. It was open to the public, and conducted with all the pomp, which the occasion calls for. The remainder of the inaugural week will be given in reunion, during which all degrees will be conferred. The new cathedral in point of general magnificence is surpassed by only two in the United States, those being cathedrals of the Grand Consistories of Illinois, at Chicago, and of Ohio, at Cincinnati.” Both Chicago and Cincinnati boasted theatrical stages with elaborate scenery collections, but they were in the Northern Jurisdiction.
The article also notes, “All degrees will be conferred,” which translates to “all degree will be dramatically presented” aligning with the staged degree productions in the Chicago and Cincinnati Scottish Rite theaters at the time.
The Grand Consistory, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, was organized in Louisville, August 21, 1852, with meetings being held on the Southwest corner of Fourth and Jefferson Streets. By August 1876, the Louisville Scottish Rite occupied the Courier-Journal Building, located on Jefferson Street, between Third and Fourth Street. In 1894, the Louisville Scottish Rite Bodies purchased the St. Paul’s Episcopal Church at Sixth and Walnut Streets. The church has been partially destroyed by fire when they acquired the building, and approximately $41,000 was spent on remodeling the facility. By 1895, it was dedicated as a Scottish Rite Cathedral. This predates what Little Rock and Oakland would do in 1896; remodel an existing space to include a Scottish Rite theatre to fully confer, or stage, the degree work. This Louisville Scottish Rite building was used until 1923, when their new home was constructed at Brook and Gray streets.
In 1910, Toomey & Volland business records note that they delivered a scenery collection to the Louisville Scottish Rite. This scenery would have replaced the original scenery installed in the renovated Episcopal Church space. Churches were perfect buildings to retrofit with theatrical stages for degree productions.
There is not yet a definitive indicator of the scenic artist or studio that first delivered the original scenery in 1895. However, it was not Toomey & Volland, as the firm was not established until 1901. Toomey and Volland delivered scenery to the Louisville Scottish Rite Cathedral in 1910, with many of their backdrops being refurbished and transported to the new building during 1923. This was a common practice throughout both the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction at the time. The Guthrie, Oklahoma, Scottish Rite even reused and transported their 1910 scenery collection to the new building during this same time.
The first Scottish Rite Cathedral in Louisville was a remodeled building. St. Paul’s Episcopal Church at Sixth and Walnut Streets was renovated for Scottish Rite purposes in 1895. From this moment forward, the Masonic membership in Louisville continued to grow at a rapid rate, as was common with many other Valleys that began producing degree work for the stage. By 1919, Louisville’s Scottish Rite candidate class size numbered 200, and the overall membership began exceeding the building’s capacity.
During the 67th annual spring reunion in 1919, the president of the “Victory Class “of Scottish Rite candidates introduced a resolution. Dr. T. H. Tuley urged, “the Grand Consistory immediately to make plans for the erection of a [new] Scottish Rite Cathedral in Louisville which will prove a credit to the Rite and to the city.” The Courier-Journal reported, “the reading of the resolution was greeted with applause, and from the manner in which the proposition was received it seems possible some steps in this direction will be taken” (26 April 1919, page 4).
Previously, the Courier-Journal reported, “Largest Class in History of Consistory Attending Scottish Rite Meeting. 200 At First Dinner” (23 April 1919, page 9). The session opened at 10AM on April 22, with conferring the Lodge of Perfection degrees (4-14). The article noted, “For several months the Scottish Rite has been practically overwhelmed with applications for membership, every Masonic lodge in the State reporting unusually large numbers of initiates.
The result has been that for the first time in many years it has been necessary to hold two spring Scottish Rite classes, the first one having completed work only about ten days ago.” Capt. John H. Cowles, sovereign grand inspector general of the Supreme Council of the Rite, was interviewed by the Courier-Times. The newspaper reported, “He says unusually large classes are being accepted into the rite in all consistories of the southern jurisdiction. He was highly pleased with the showing made by the Louisville lodge, especially in view of the fact that he received his degrees here and is a native of Kentucky, having lived for many years in Louisville.” In 1919, the Louisville Scottish Rite premiered a four-page publication for attendees titled “The Reunion News.” It was published every day during the Scottish Rite reunion. Interestingly, the Scottish Rite once met in the same building as the local newspaper, the Courier-Journal.
Scottish Rite membership was explosive during the 1920s, and the influential power of the Freemasons was substantial. This is a moment in time when the Rite, especially the Louisville Scottish Rite, was very vocal about their activities and positions on both political and social issues. From the late-nineteenth century to early twentieth century, it was not unusual to find detailed information pertaining to daily activities at Scottish Rite reunions, a list of members, the history of the organization and their stance on public and political topics. For example, the views of the Rite regarding public education were published in the local newspapers for all to read. When a potential candidate thought about joining a particular Scottish Rite, there was no question in his mind about what the organization stood for and could determine in advance if it was a good fit. This may be why the Scottish Rite continued to gain ground and dominate the fraternal landscape of America during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries.
In regard to the construction of their new home, on May 11, 1923, the Courier-Journal published, “Scottish Rite Masons will begin a three-day campaign May 23, to raise the $300,000 necessary to complete their building fund for the proposed $750,000 cathedral at the southwest corner of Fourth and Breckinridge Streets. Ground for this structure will be broken in September, it was said. The cathedral will have four stories and basement, with an auditorium seating 1,350 persons. Solicitation will be from the 2,286 members in the State of which 1,200 are in Louisville, The campaign will be in charge if Benjamin S. Washer, Richard Priest Dietzman, Edward F. Metzner, Harvey White and Dr. E. L. Henderson” (page 18).
On June 27, 1923, the old Scottish Rite was sold, becoming the new R. E. Jones Temple, Methodist Episcopal Church. On September 9, 1923, the Courier-Journal announced, “The contract for the construction at Fourth and Breckinridge Streets will be awarded shortly after bids are opened about October 15” (page 34). The building was sold to the Methodist Episcopal Church, becoming the R. E. Jones Temple. Rev. Dr. Robert Elijah Jones (1872-1960), namesake for the new church, was also a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason. Within a year, however, tragedy struck the old Scottish Rite building. On May 27, 1924, the Courier-Journal reported “Five Firemen and a negro preacher were overcome by smoke last night when flames of undetermined origin ignited debris in the basement of the R. E. Jones Temple, formerly the Scottish Rite Cathedral at Sixth and Walnut Streets” (page 5).
There is one thing to consider about the original Scottish Rite stage and scenery when the Louisville Scottish Rite Cathedral changed ownership. When the building became the R. E. Jones Temple, it is highly unlikely that any fraternal artifacts or decorations were left behind. This means that the old scenery, stage machinery and other stage equipment was either returned to scenic studio (for credit on the purchase of a new collection), it was enlarged for their new stage, or it was sold to another Scottish Rite. To all indications, there remains a significant amount of scenery used by the Louisville Scottish Rite that predates the current building, c. 1910.
In 1910, the Louisville Scottish Rite purchased scenery from Toomey & Volland. Interestingly, Toomey and Volland advertisements from 1912 do not list Louisville alongside fifteen other Scottish Rite Cathedral installations by that time, suggesting that they may have only been adding to a previous purchase. Toomey & Volland could have simply expanded an earlier collection, possibly the one delivered in 1895. There is a distinct possibility that scenery was delivered by the precursor to Toomey & Volland – the scenic studio of Noxon & Toomey.
Thomas C. Noxon was a Freemason, and extremely active in the Shrine. Also, in 1895, Noxon & Toomey delivered stock scenery to Louisville’s Amphitheatre Auditorium. This may have been the crucial connection, a preliminary link with Louisville Masons and the scenic studio of Toomey & Volland. It would not be surprising to learn that Noxon visited the Scottish Rite while installing scenery for another theatrical venue; a common practice among scenic studio owners at the time.
It remains uncertain as to whether the major Scottish Rite scenery supplier to the Southern Jurisdiction at the time, E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co., delivered any scenery to the Louisville Scottish Rite Cathedral. Scottish Rite minutes may point to a specific vendor. If the theater work was contracted to E. A. Armstrong, Sosman & Landis were the preferred subcontractors in the mid-1890s, the scenic studio who manufactured and installed the scenery for this fraternal supplier. However, the Louisville Scottish Rite is not listed in a 1902 E. A. Armstrong advertisement that notes all the Consistories they had equipped since 1897. Keep in mind that was after the potential 1895 date of delivery. If it was manufactured at the Sosman & Landis studio, David A. Strong would have been the Masonic designer and primary scenic artist for the earliest Louisville collection due to his early Masonic affiliation. Strong was instrumental in producing much of Chicago’s Scottish Rite scenery for stages starting in 1873; this was the other Masonic theater that Louisville was compared with in 1895.
There are two other possibilities in regard to regional artists who may have created the original 1895 scenery collection Louisville Scottish Rite Cathedral –scenic artists E. T. Harvey or Henry C. Tryon.
Harvey was the scenic artist who designed, painted, and installed Scottish Rite scenery collections for Cincinnati in 1886 and Cleveland in 1901. In 1886, Harvey delivered eighteen sets of scenery to the Cleveland Scottish Rite Cathedral’s stage. Keep in mind that Louisville’s 1895 Scottish Rite Cathedral was compared with the Cincinnati Scottish Rite Cathedral in the newspaper article; “The new cathedral in point of general magnificence is surpassed by only two in the United States, those being cathedrals of the Grand Consistories of Illinois, at Chicago, and of Ohio, at Cincinnati.”
Tryon was the scenic artist credited with scenery and stage machinery at the Indianapolis Scottish Rite a few years earlier in 1883. Both Harvey and Tryon were close friends with Thomas G. Moses, who was in charge of the design, painting, construction, and installation of all Scottish Rite scenery at Sosman & Landis (Chicago) after 1904.”
There is so much more that I could write about this project and the collection as a whole, but I need to pause here. For more posts about this collection, keyword search “Louisville Scottish Rite.”