Month: January 2019

Part 632: Tying Up Some Loose Ends and Flying It Out

The development of the counterweight system installed at Scottish Rite theaters by Sosman & Landis between 1904 and 1917 was called “Brown’s special system.”

At first glance it appears to be the brainchild of traveling salesman Bestor G. Brown, or someone he was working with at the time, possibly a stage mechanic at the Sosman & Landis scenic studio. There was one potential client who would benefit in the end– the Scottish Rite. This new technology allowed more drops to be crammed into a limited amount of space, resulting in the sale of even more stage machinery and scenery. It was a win-win for the manufacturer, distributor, and client.

This system does not use sandbags and pin rails, like those iconic backstage scenes depicted in movies. For those unfamiliar with the counterweight system, let me explain a few characteristics in laymen terms. “Brown’s special system” raises and lowers scenery completely out of sight, necessitating a fly loft to accommodate the full height of each drop. The counterweights are located off stage and match the weight of the scenery onstage (it is balanced like a big teeter totter when both kids are the same size). The counterweights (little metal blocks of varying sizes with notches to keep them in from falling out) are held in wooden frames, called arbors. Brown’s special system requires no locking mechanism at all, as each line is perfectly balanced. In other words, one can easily raise or lower the scenes without any effort; whenever I stop pulling on a line, the drop will stop moving and stay put. This is an deal system for stagehands without any knowledge of technical theater or rigging. Problems only occur when some well-intentioned person starts messing with the system; adding weight, moving drops to other lines; or doing in-house maintenance and repairs.

Back to the salesman who sold this system. From 1894 to 1917, Brown represented two separate fraternal supply companies – E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co. and M. C. Lilley & Co. During that time, Sosman & Landis received the majority of subcontracted work from Brown. The Sosman & Landis studio consistently worked with Brown during his time, manufacturing and installing the stage machinery and scenery at Scottish Rite temples. This means that someone at Sosman & Landis worked with Brown to design the counterweight system called Brown’s special system. It may have been a stage mechanic at Sosman & Landis who conceived and developed the counterweight system that would become the standard for Scottish Rite theaters. The earliest existing example of Brown’s Special System, still working as originally installed in 1904, is located in Duluth, Minnesota. Earlier examples exist, but the scenery and stage machinery were removed from the original venue and installed in another Scottish Rite theater over the years. Earlier examples include scenery originally installed in Little Rock Arkansas (1896-1901) and later installed at Pasadena California; scenery originally installed in Wichita, Kansas (1898) and later installed in Yankton, South Dakota; and scenery originally installed in Guthrie, Oklahoma (1900) and later installed in Austin, Texas.

There is another player who enters into the fraternal mix with Bestor G. Brown, Sosman & Landis, and E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co. That would be the veteran Sosman & Landis stage mechanic, Charles S. King. Let’s briefly review the first few players before throwing King into the mix.

1. Brown was a very successful traveling salesman, representing two different fraternal supply companies (E. A. Armstrong and M. C. Lilley) after he left an investment banking career in 1893. For each firm, he promoted the outfitting of fraternal lodges and staging of Masonic degrees. He was a prominent member in many fraternal organizations that included Freemasonry, Independent Order of Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias, and Benevolent and Protected Order of Elks. He also was renowned for his worked as the Wichita Scottish Rite stage director and heralded as the only “Masonic stage carpenter” and “Masonic stage manager” in the United States. Brown was a member of both the Northern and Southern Jurisdiction of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish rite of Freemasonry, so he fully understand the staging requirements and possibilities for the degrees.

2. E. A. Armstrong Company (est. 1868 in Detroit, Michigan), like M. C. Lilley & Co. (est. 1865 Columbus, Ohio), was a supplier of regalia and paraphernalia for all societies, including fraternal, military, and band. They manufactured uniforms, costumes, banners, badges, flags, lodge furniture, and other accessories for various organizations and lodge rooms. Costumes and other fraternal regalia were essential elements to all rituals, especially after ritual revisions. E. A. Armstrong established their offices and manufacturing plant in Chicago, as the city became a central shipping hub for the western United States. Lavish clothing and the addition or even more elaborate décor transformed many lodge room degrees into fully tsgaed spectacles. Neither company, however, specialized in theatre scenery, stage machinery or lighting. For theater installations, they subcontracted all part of the stage portion to scenic studios, such as Sosman & Landis (Chicago).

3. The scenic studio of Sosman & Landis was established in 1877 by Joseph S. Sosman and Abraham “Perry” Landis. Sosman arrived in Chicago as a young assistant to the successful scenic artist T. B. Harrison in 1874; keep that date in mind when we circle back to King working for Sosman. Little is known of Sosman’s scenic artwork in Chicago before establishing Sosman & Landis, yet the firm successfully ran until the mid-1920s. Sosman passed away in 1915, and the company president became long-time scenic artist Thomas G. Moses. Moses credit Brown with the development of Masonic scenery.

Enter Charles S. King, a well-known stage mechanic and Sosman & Landis employee. Before I start connecting the dots, there is a link between C. S. King and E. A. Armstrong during 1890 that appeared in the “Courier-Post” (Camden, New Jersey, 6 Jan 189, page 1). There were two cases in the circuit court involving E. A. Armstrong (plaintiff) and C. S. King (defendant). Each case pertained to a contract dispute between the two, suggesting that E. A. Armstrong was involved in theater before Brown. At the time, C. S. King was working for Sosman & Landis as a stage mechanic and E. A. Armstrong was operating his regalia company.

King’s name was first brought to my attention by Rick Boychuk, He detailed King’s contribution as a stage carpenter during the construction of the Crump Theatre in 1889, a project with scenery and stage machinery delivered by Sosman & Landis and a drop curtain painted by Moses. This is only one year before the abovementioned court case with E. A. Armstrong.

By 1887, King was credited as working in more than 200 theaters across the nation, yet very little is known about this prolific stage mechanic beyond a few newspaper articles. Let me summarize what I know about this individual. King began his career as a stage carpenter and stage machinist in 1859, With the exception of serving in the Union Armey during the Civil War and managing a large touring company, King solely functioned in these two roles his entire career. King notes that he began working for Sosman & Landis in 1874, yet the firm did not officially open until 1877, suggesting that King began working with Sosman upon his arrival in Chicago during 1874. King installed stage machinery in theaters throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. A “Star Tribune” article from January 27, 1881, reported, “Mr. C. S. King, the stage carpenter at the Grand Opera House, was initiated into some of the mysteries of stage mechanism as exemplified in our new temple of amusement. Mr. King who was summoned here from Chicago, is regarded as one of the best stage-carpenters in the country, having had wide experience and possessing perfect knowledge of his progression. He says that our opera house will have the finest stage, the easiest worked, and will be the best appointed theatre west of Chicago, or of many large eastern cities.” The stage carpenter who would manage the venue after King’s departure was William Knox Brown, one of the three founders of Twin City Scenic Company. Another Twin City Scenic Co. founder was William P. Davis who previously worked as the primary scenic artist at the Chicago Auditorium. Brown’s stage mechanic flourished with the Hanlon Brothers who hired William Knox Brown as one of their stage mechanics to develop scenic effects in their Massachusetts studio (see past installment #155). The Hanlon Brothers engineered amazing mechanical effects for their staged spectacles.

In 1889, an article about the Crump Theatre reported, “Mr. King Came to Columbus Sept. 11, and commenced on the bare floor of the new theatre to construct the various stage machinery, mount scenery, and everything connected with stage settings, all without drawings or specifications, except those stored in his head from long experience. How well he succeeded in his work is there to speak for itself, and is pronounced by the profession to be the most modern, convenient and elaborate.” The 1881 and 1889 articles suggest two things: 1. King possessed techniques pertaining to the design and construction of stage machinery that others did not and, 2. King’s keeping everything connected with stage settings in his head, “all without drawings or specifications,” suggests he maintained trade secrets. Think back to guilds and cathedral builders, complete with lodges, masters, passwords, and secret signs. Being able to do something that others can’t gives you the leading edge. Now think of King being “initiated into some of the mysteries of stage mechanism.” It is possible that these were more than common ceremonies associated with the rise of American fraternalism.

What new innovations pertaining to stage machinery could be occurring at this same time? Lets look back to Chicago where Sosman & Landis are running a successful studio, Detroit fraternal supplier E. A. Armstrong is contemplating a move to Chicago, and the Chicago Auditorium is being planned. Add in the possibility of a world fair, with the potential of untold networking and future projects.

One particular event examined at this time is in Rick Boychuk’s “Nobody Looks Up: The History of the Counterweight Rigging System, 1500-1925” (https://www.amazon.com/Nobody-Looks-Up-History-Counterweight/dp/1508438102/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1548878503&sr=8-1&keywords=rick+boychuk) – the Chicago Auditorium of 1889. Boychuk writes, “The first counterweight rigging system in American was state-of-the-art technology when it was installed in 1889 in the Auditorium Building in Chicago – commonly referred to as the Chicago Auditorium” (page 167). Boychuk explains how Ferdinand Peck, the visionary for the Chicago auditorium, traveled to Europe to examine opera houses, later joined by architect Dankmar Adler (Adler & Sullivan) and Chicago stage carpenter John Bairstow. Boychuk suggests, “Chicago borrowed the sheave design and configuration from Budapest and the balance of the counterweight system from Vienna” (page 172).

Now consider that John Bairstow was a member of the Theatrical Mechanics Association, an organization established in New York during 1866 (see mentions in past installments 125, 153, 215 and 384). By 1891, there were 28 lodges represented at the Theatrical Mechanics Association convention in Chicago, including members from Chicago Lodge No. 4. Lodge No. 4 – John Bairstow and David A. Strong. Strong was a well-known scenic artist and stage mechanic working at Sosman & Landis, Strong provided scenery for the original “Black Crook” at Niblo’s Garden in 1866. He later moved to Chicago where he joined the Scottish Rite and continued work as a scenic artist, eventually joining the studio of Sosman & Landis, working alongside another Sosman & Landis stage mechanic – King. Thomas G. Moses would credit Strong in his memoirs as the “Daddy” of Scottish Rite design; he did not specify that Strong solely designed the painted aesthetic. Two other Theatrical Mechanics Association Chicago Lodge No. 4 members who attended the 1891 convention would also later become Scottish Rite Masons – F. V. Sauter (joined Oriental Consistory in 1892) and Wallace Blanchard (joined Oriental Consistory in 1899).

So lets look at the players who were known Scottish Rite Masons when this all began – E. A. Armstrong (regalia supplier), Bestor G. Brown (salesman), William Knox Brown (stage mechanic), Joseph S. Sosman (scenic artist and studio owner), David A. Strong (stage mechanic and scenic artist).

To be continued…

 

 

Part 631: Original and Reliable – E. A. Armstrong 

Those first theaters created for the Southern Jurisdiction of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry were secured by the E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co. and subcontracted to Sosman & Landis. Both companies were in Chicago and both companies were run by Scottish Rite Masons. The key figure was Bestor G. Brown, a traveling salesman for E. A. Armstrong who was in charge of their Masonic Department. Brown was also involved in multiple fraternal orders and understood all necessary degree requirements. Brown opened the door to this enterprise, E. A. Armstrong provided the financial backing, and Sosman & Landis created something remarkable for staged degree work. Let’s look at the E. A. Armstrong company first, a fraternal supply company that got its start in Detroit during 1868. By the 1890s, they were building a new manufacturing plant in Chicago.

The E. A. Armstrong Company, manufacturers of and dealers in society and military supplies, were located at Nos. 149 and 151 Wabash Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, during 1893. The company had already run a successful business for two decades in Detroit, Michigan, moving to Chicago during the summer of 1892. At the time, the officers of the company were E. A. Armstrong, President; F. S. Armstrong, Vice-President; and F. C. King, Secretary (Chicago Tribune, 6 June 1893, page 3). In 1893 while finishing the construction of their factory, the company encountered some financial trouble. Newspapers across the country reported that the company would close its doors due to money owed and a court ruling.

The “Indianapolis Journal,” commented, “Mr. Armstrong said that the cause of the trouble was due to the drawing out of more money than they anticipated in the building of their new factory at Ninety-second street and the Grand Trunk road. ‘Every dollar’s worth of property that we owe on earth,’ said Mr. Armstrong, ‘is here in this business, and every dollar of it is in the hands of our assignee for the protection of our creditors. This suspension is only temporary at most” (6 Jun 1893, page 1). The company managed to survive, becoming the E. A Armstrong Manufacturing Company. They managed to corner the market on a significant client in the years to follow– Scottish Rite Consistories. Keep in mind that the Scottish Rite consists of four bodies: the Lodge of Perfection (4-14 degrees), Chapter of Rose Croix (15-18 degrees), Council of Kadosh (19- 30 degrees) and the Consistory (31-32 degrees). It is the Consistory that often led the construction of a theater that all of the Scottish Rite bodies used to stage degree productions.

By 1902, “Masonic Voice-Review” included an article about the E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company that included the “Eminent Sir Bestor G. Brown” as working in the Masonic Division of E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company of Chicago (page 282) Brown would later go onto become the western sales representative of the M. C. Lilley & Co., with his regional offices in Kansas City, Missouri, bringing all of his Scottish Rite contacts with him. He was the catch of the day when it came to securing Scottish Rite theater business.

Here is the article “Original and Reliable” from “Masonic Voice-Review:”

‘Made on honor; is a legend that every manufacturer should be ambitious to have justly applied to his product, and is certainly an evidence of the good faith, integrity and courage of the concern that brands every article turned out with the significant sentiment in question as its trademark and guarantee. The right to use this protective designation as applied to Masonic supplies has been earned by E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company, of Chicago, by more than thirty years of continuous production of the most reliable and serviceable articles to be found in the market. The business was organized in Detroit, Michigan in 1868 by Mr. E. A. Armstrong, who has been in charge of the business without interruption since the date. The business was removed to Chicago in 1893, and in the following year was reorganized, additional capital invested, and a stock company formed under the name of E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company.

The worthily popular products of this house have made the name “Armstrong” famous as the equivalent for reliability. None of the rights, patents or patterns employed in the production of “Armstrong Goods” and the “Armstrong Uniforms” have passed to other hands, and the Masonic requisites so long familiar to the Craft are still produced upon the same plans of superiority that originally secured favor for them, and are manufactured solely by this company. The guarantee that goes with every sale is that the goods will give perfect satisfaction and are absolutely as represented.

The E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company is entitled to point with pride to the preferment it has secured among the various bodies of the Scottish Rite throughout the country. Excepting the Consistory at Columbus, Ohio, they have furnished the equipment and paraphernalia for every Consistory in the United States that has been in the market for an outfit in the past five years – certainly a phenomenal showing, and one that commends the output of the concern in unmistakable terms. The Consistories that have been equipped within the period mentioned by the company are located at Indianapolis, Ind.; Little Rock, Ark.; Galveston, Tex.; Kansas City, Miss.; Wichita, Kan.; Guthrie, Okla.; Fargo, N.D.; and St. Louis, Mo.

The equipment of the St. Louis Consistory which represented an order of $6,200, was delivered in May of the present year. The secret of this practical monopoly of the Scottish Rite patronage by the Armstrong house is the inherent excellence of its goods and the uniformly courteous and honorable treatment accorded its patrons. The Eminent Sir Bestor G. Brown has special charge of the Masonic Department, and his intelligence and energetic methods coupled with a thorough knowledge of the requirements of the Craft has much to do with the notable success of this branch of the business.”

To be continued…

Part 630: Bestor G. Brown and E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Co.

In 1909, Moses wrote, “The Dallas Masonic work came in early, so did San Francisco and Cleveland, Ohio.” That year, Moses also supervised scenery collections for Scottish Rite theaters in Kansas City, Kansas, Winona, Minnesota, and Atlanta, Georgia. Today we look at the Kansas and Bestor G. Brown (1861-1917) before looking at the Scottish Rite installation in Kansas City, Kansas, during 1909.

Starting in the 1890s, Kansas became a hot bed of Scottish Rite activity. Theatre construction, new degree productions, and Masonic celebrations drew men together from across the region. It was during this time that both fraternal and business alliances were formed. Bestor G. Brown became the central hub on a spinning wheel of fraternal activity. As I have discussed in recent posts, Brown, would become the future western sales representative of the M. C. Lilley & Co., with his regional offices in Kansas City, Missouri. Brown joined Siloam Lodge No. 225, on March 11, 1884, where he served as Master in 1887 and 1888. Brown was also involved with other Masonic orders, such as the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, York Rite, Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, and Order of the Eastern Star. In fact, Brown’s outstanding fraternal service gained him title to Kansas Lodge No. 433 A. F. & A. M. Lodge on March 1, 1923. It is now the Bestor G. Brown Lodge No. 433. Brown was involved with other non-Masonic fraternities, such as the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, the Knights of Pythias and the Benevolent and Protected Order of Elks. I have to ask myself where the guy found enough time to do it all as he traveled so much.

Brown became a traveling salesman, peddling supplies for E. A. Armstrong during the 1890s. This was before Brown became the western sales manager for M. C. Lilley & Co. in 1904. From 1897 until 1902, Brown had special charge of the Armstrong’s Masonic department and secured ALL of the consistory contracts except one. That one was in Columbus, Ohio, however, by 1909, he would secure that Consistory contract too. In the 1902 publication “Masonic Voice-Review,” an article titled “Original and Reliable” commended the quality of products manufactured by the E. A. Armstrong Manufacturing Company of Chicago and Brown’s contribution. The article noted, “Excepting the Consistory at Columbus, Ohio, they have furnished the equipment and paraphernalia for every Consistory in the United States that has been in the market for an outfit in the past five years… The Consistories that have been equipped within the period mentioned by the company are located at Indianapolis, Ind.; Little Rock, Ark.; Galveston, Tex.; Kansas City, Miss.; Wichita, Kan.; Guthrie, Okla.; Fargo, N.D.; and St. Louis, Mo.” The article continued, “The Eminent Sir Bestor G. Brown has special charge of the Masonic Department, and his intelligence and energetic methods coupled with a thorough knowledge of the requirements of the Craft has much to do with the notable success of this branch of the business.”

This is a big deal, as it suggested that E. A. Armstrong captured the Scottish Rite theater business of the entire Southern Jurisdiction after Pike’s passing; remember, Pike, was not a supporter of stage degree productions and he was in charge of the Southern Jurisdiction until his death in 1891.

Brown was there when the Southern Jurisdictions first designed and installed their new scenery. He would be there again when these Masonic venues grew and needed new scenery a decade later. The only difference was that Brown would later be representing M. C. Lilley & Co. Consider this…the Valley’s were repurchasing scenery thru Brown. This did not necessarily mean that they were going with another company; they were going with the same man who just happened to now work for a new company. Brown knew what they wanted and what they already had. In other words, the Consistories believed he would take care of them as a fellow 32nd degree Scottish Rite Mason.

The April 15, 1908, issue of “The American Tyler” would credit Brown as “the only Masonic stage manager in the country.” The article would further explain, “This is because he has a national reputation among scenic artists and builders of stage appliances, and because he created and developed the application of modern scenic properties to the dramatic presentation of all Masonic degrees. More value is probably attached to his opinion in such matters than to that of any other man in the country, and he is almost invariably consulted in regard to the construction of stages for the work of the Scottish Rite, everywhere throughout the United States.”

Each Scottish Rite Valley’s loyalty was to Brown and not necessarily the company he represented – M. C. Lilley. The scenic studio of Sosman & Landis was closely linked to Brown and his business. Brown and Sosman were both Scottish Rite Masons. After Sosman died in 1915 and Brown died in 1917, the Masonic connection dried up and much business went to Toomey & Volland who had been steadily building up their Masonic repertoire. And guess what? Volland was a Scottish Rite Mason and in charge of the stage direction at the Scottish Rite in St. Louis; the same as Brown who had been in charge of the stage direction in Wichita, Kansas. Volland was the “shiny new thing” on the Masonic playground. Volland got his Masonic scenery start in 1902, when Toomey & Volland were subcontracted by E. A. Armstrong to deliver $6,200 worth of scenery and stage equipment to the St. Louis Consistory during May and Brown was the one to negotiate the contract.

To be continued…

Part 629: The Cleveland Scottish Rite, 1909

In 1909, Moses wrote, “The Dallas Masonic work came in early, so did San Francisco and Cleveland, Ohio.” That year, Moses also supervised scenery collections for Scottish Rite theaters in Kansas City, Kansas, Winona, Minnesota, and Atlanta, Georgia.

The Valley of Cleveland consists of a ten-county area in northern Ohio. The four Scottish Rite bodies included the Eliadah Lodge of Perfection, Bahurim Council, Ariel Chapter and Lake Erie Consistory. I have uncovered very little information about the building occupied by the Cleveland Scottish Rite before their move to their new home at 3615 Euclid Avenue. The previous Masonic Temple was built in 1883 and located at Superior Avenue and East 6^th St.

Of this first home for the Scottish Rite, the “Akron Beacon Journal” noted that eight Akron Masons received the 32^nd degree at the Spring Scottish Rite reunion in Cleveland (10 March 1910, page 4). The article reported, “The territory covered at this meeting is of northeastern Ohio. Several hundred are expected from the cities. Between 50 and 100 from Akron intend to go. There will be a class of 95 who will take their degrees up through the 32^nd degree.” The first Masonic Temple was obviously a sizable space.

Construction for the new Masonic building commenced during 1918. Interestingly, in 1919, Toomey & Volland scenic studio records indicate that they created scenery for the Cleveland Scottish Rite Temple. Ten years earlier, Sosman & Landis created the scenery for degree work in Cleveland. After 1915, it was not uncommon for Toomey & Volland to underbid Sosman & Landis on Masonic projects, especially in the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction. The Masonic connection provided by Joseph S. Sosman, of Sosman & Landis, disappeared when he passed away in 1915. Thomas G. Moses had taken over the company but was not yet a Mason.

The new Masonic Temple in Cleveland was designed by Hubbell & Benes, the same firm that designed the Cleveland museum of art in 1916. Home to many Masonic Orders, including the Scottish Rite, the massive Masonic structure covered 102,000 square feet of space, with a 2200-seat auditorium. Acclaimed for its acoustics, the Masonic Temple was once home to the Cleveland Orchestra for a decade, before their move in 1931 to Severance Hall.

As with many other Masonic buildings of this scope, declining membership after World War II and escalated expenses from deferred maintenance cause the Cleveland Masons to put their building on the market in 2017. The corporate secretary of the Cleveland Scottish Rite admitted that it cost $400,000 a year to maintain the building, “an outlay that would soon exhaust the operating endowment.” There is an article from 6, August, 2015 that includes some lovely photographs of the building. Here is the link to many of the attached pictures (https://www.cleveland.com/architecture/index.ssf/2015/08/landmark_masonic_auditorium_-.html).

Nearly one hundred years after construction began on the Masonic Auditorium in Cleveland, it was sold to a private developer. An affiliate of Arkansas-based Beaty Capital Group, Inc. paid only $725,000 for the complex on March 31, 2017. Cleveland’s Masonic building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the property is eligible for preservation funding including state and federal tax credits.

This is the same group that purchased the Scottish Rite in Forth Smith, Arkansas.

A subsidiary of the Beaty Capital Group, TempleLive (https://www.templelive.com/about/), also purchased the Zembo Shrine building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in 2018 (https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/01/zembo_shrine_sale_shriners_ple.html).

In Cleveland, Fort Smith and Harrisburg, the Fraternity will never be able to afford the expense of constructing anything comparable. The materials and craftsmanship necessary to build these types of buildings are often no longer available. In Cleveland, the chandeliers are made from pieces of shell and hobnailed doors lead to the auditorium. The ones who lose are future generations of Masons who will never experience the space, or the physical sense of heritage. The buildings were planned and constructed by men with vision. It also takes vision to place Freemasonry in the context of today and contemplate how these venues can be saved. The winners in the end are those who are able to purchase these jewels for less than market price and turn a profit.

To be continued…

Part 628: The San Francisco Scottish Rite, 1909

In 1909, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “The Dallas Masonic work came in early, so did San Francisco and Cleveland, Ohio.” These were only three of six Scottish Rite installations supervised by Moses in 1909 while he was working at Sosman & Landis. Others included Kansas City, Kansas, Winona, Minnesota, and Atlanta, Georgia.

The first San Francisco Scottish Rite outfitted with scenery by Sosman & Landis was destroyed during the fire after the San Francisco earthquake. The original 1906 collection was contracted with M. C. Lilley & Co., and subsequently subcontracted to the Sosman & Landis scenic studio. In 1906, the western sales representative for M. C. Lilley & Co., Bestor G. Brown, was in town attending a meeting at the San Francisco Masonic Temple when the earthquake struck. During the first tremors early in the morning of April 18, 1906, Brown was sleeping at the Union League Club. The San Francisco earthquake triggered several fires that burned the city for the next two days. Brown’s eyewitness account of his experience was first published in the “Topeka Daily Capital” (April 25, 1906, page 7).

The article reported, ““The Grand Chapter of Masons met in the forenoon at the Masonic temple and were holding their meeting when the military came in and said it was time to move as they were going to dynamite the Palace hotel.” Brown elaborated, “I went out to the street and saw the fire creeping up from two sides. I saw it creep up to the back door off the meat market on Market Street and the minute it touched the rear of the building it seemed to sweep through and bulge out into the street in front. About the time I took to the woods, I started for the waterfront and got there in about an hour and a half.”

The cornerstone for the second San Francisco Scottish Rite Temple was laid on October 12, 1909, by the Grand Master of California, Oscar Lawler. The “San Francisco Call,” reported “Cornerstone of Scottish Rite Cathedral Lowered Into Place Before Big Throng.” The trowel was a “handsome beaten silver blade of which the insignia f the order was an appropriate inscription” and presented to Grand Master Lawler by W. P. Filmer in behalf of the Scottish Rite Temple Association. Lawler was retiring and being succeeded by W. Frank Pierce. Remember that Pierce was also the Inspector General of California and the Grand Grand Chancellor of the Scottish Rite instrumental in advocating for the new House of the Temple. As part of the Finanace Committee, Pierce introduced the 1904 resolution that paid each SGIG and Deputy $2 per each incoming 32^nd degree Mason for each respective jurisdiction

The “San Francisco Call” article continued, “The dedication of the building itself was as a house erected to God, and destined to stand as a symbol of truth, intelligence, honesty and integrity in the pursuit of the highest ideals of mankind.” The time capsule placed under the cornerstone included a roster of the members of the San Francisco bodies of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, a copy of the Trestle Board for October, 1909, the bulletin of the San Francisco lodges of perfection for August and September, 1909, the latest bulletins of the chapter, council, and consistory, the bulletin of the reception to Sovereign Grand Commander James Daniel Richardson, the notice of laying of the cornerstone, samples of the stationary used by the San Francisco bodies of Scottish Rite, the San Francisco morning daily papers of yesterday, the proceedings of the grand lodge of California for 1908, coins minted in 1909, a copy of the New Age for September of this year and business cards of the architects and contractors in charge of the construction of the building.”

Located on the northeast corner of Sutter Street and Van Ness avenue, the block was cemented in the foundation wall of the new building. The final cost of this four-story building was $330,000 and was home to the San Francisco Bodies No. 1, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. As part of the ceremonies on October 12, 1909, the “San Francisco Call” noted that “many members of the grand body attended a meeting in King Solomon’s Hall, where Berkeley lodge exemplified the work in the apprentice, or first degree.”

The stage was outfitted with scenery by Sosman & Landis, and Moses supervised the production of the backdrops for the West Coat. These drops area still used on the same stage, but the building is now known as the Regency Center. It is no longer owned by the Fraternity and odd to see the Masonic settings as thematic backings for a variety of public events, including cabaret shows. The current stewards of the building now advertise the edifice as a unique venue with three separate event spaces. The Scottish Rite theater is now marketed as “The Lodge.” Generations of San Franciscans have now performed on the stage, worked the fly lines, or applauded from the audience, all marveling at the painting from years ago. Moses’ scenery, especially his forest scene, continues to thrill both spectators and performers.

In 1964 the San Francisco Scottish Rite moved to new building, new scenery constructed by the Western Scenic Co. of Oakland, California. The backdrops were designed and painted by member Gus R. Schneider, an MGM artist. The third Scottish Rite constructed for the San Francisco Bodies is a sign of the times when it was built. I have included some images that from their Facebook page that give a sense of the degree work now being performed in the space with Schneider’s scenery.

To be continued…

Part 627: The Dallas Scottish Rite, 1909

In 1909, Thomas G. Moses wrote, “The Dallas Masonic work came in early, so did San Francisco and Cleveland, Ohio.” These were only three of six Scottish Rite installations supervised by Moses in 1909 while he was working at Sosman & Landis. Others included Kansas City, Kansas, Winona, Minnesota, and Atlanta, Georgia.

Sosman & Landis delivered 119 drops and stage machinery to the Scottish Rite at 500 S Harwood Street, Dallas. This Temple was not completed until 1913, however, degree productions took place on the stage by 1909. The scenery contract for the stage was negotiated by Bestor G. Brown of M. C. Lilley & Co.

On April 26, 1913, the “Dallas Morning News” described the Masonic Cathedral and Architect Herbert M. Green’s contributions. Keep in mind that the theater of the building was referred to as “the great degree room.”

The article reported, “On the second floor one will find the lobby, which is in Roman Ionic; the Corinthian lodge room is green and gold: candidates lounging room, modified Colonial with color scheme of brown and blue and smoking foyer in the same effect. In the great degree room are columns copied from those in the Temple of Karnak at Thebes. Over sixty shades of color are used harmoniously in the ornamental beams and columns supporting the ceiling of sky blue – a ceiling whereon the stars of the twelve signs of the Zodiac are so cunningly constructed, and with such ingenious electrical attachments that when the great hall is in total darkness, the constellations seem to blaze in all reality from the very heavens above.

The largest stage in Texas is in this degree room – and the largest pipe organ. There are offices restrooms, wardrobe rooms, bowling alley, grill and kitchen – heating, ventilating and lighting systems which are unsurpassed, push button elevator and house telephone system – In short every device by which modern ingenuity can add to beauty and comfort and convenience.”

The article further described that the theater, “a proscenium arch 28×22 feet is the largest stage in Texas, 24 feet deep and 60 feet in width. One hundred and nineteen scenic drops are so delicately counterweighted that the stage picture can be changed in two seconds, and if necessary in the dark. These drops are hung over the entire ceiling of the stage, being spaced three inches apart from the proscenium arch to the rear wall of the stage. Each degree has its own scenery, some degrees three and four scenes, all forming an extensive and complete equipment that it is possible to produce more different scenes than on any stage in the country. Fifteen hundred white, blue, red and amber lights, controlled from a switchboard seven feet high and twelve feet long are required to light the stage properly. These are subdued and softened as necessary by bank after bank of dimmers arranged by interlocking devices to control the degree of light at any one point of en masse. The dawn of day, a nightfall or a moonlight effect can be reproduced with marvelous fidelity…To the rear of the stage are property rooms, etc. and on the third floor a large wardrobe room, with cases for the various costumes.”

The 1913 article concluded, “”The complete cost of the building has not been, as yet, made public but it is expected to be close to $230,000. Other items not included in the building cost are:
Organ $23,000.00
Stage Scenery $28,000.00
Furnishings $21,000.00
Ground $34,000.00
Making an estimated cost of the complete equipment of about $350,000.”

The article ended here.

 

Today’s monetary equivalent of $28,000 spent in 1909 for a Scottish Rite scenery collection is $773,024.62. Dallas was only one of six Scottish Rite collection supervised by Thomas G. Moses that year. The others were in San Francisco, CA, Cleveland, OH, Kansas City, KS, Winona, MN, and Atlanta, GA. Keep in mind that Masonic work only made up 25 -30% of all work at the Sosman & Landis studios. The firm, like the Scottish Rite, was accumulating a massive amount of money at this point.

In a letter from Brown to William G. Bell at the Austin Scottish Rite, dated July 7, 1912, Brown provided further information pertaining to the Dallas Scottish Rite stage. This correspondence was to help Austin Scottish Rite bodies understand the design and delivery process; Sosman & Landis could not provide estimates or cost and installation without knowing how much scenery was needed and the structural condition of the building. Brown used the Dallas Scottish Rite as an example, writing, “the Dallas stage has in the neighborhood of 25,000 lineal feet of wire and rope in its installation; the quantity of wire and rope necessary, is determined by the heighth of the gridiron, the location of the fly gallery, and the general dimension of the stage. We would also have to look into the question of freight charges and be advised as to what prices we could obtain common gray iron castings in Austin for use as counterweights. We would have to determine on the correct number of drops to be used, because each drop requires eight pulleys besides counterweight frames and eye bolts.” These costs all needed to be estimated prior to providing a number, yet the Austin Scottish Rite kept asking, “but how much will it cost?”

Brown continued, “In our original correspondence, Mr. Green of Dallas, indicated that he was preparing plans for remodeling an old building [in Austin] and that when these plans were determined upon, he would send us the dimensions of the stage. Mr. Green understands what would be wanted, as he had the experience on the Dallas Temple.” Again, Brown was referring to Herbert M. Green, the architect and a member of the Scottish Rite and the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine.

To be continued…

Part 626: Photographing Scottish Rite Scenery

There was another significant moment that occurred during the 1909 Biennial Session of the Supreme Council of the Sovereign Grand Inspectors General of the Thirty-third Degree of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America.

It was an attempt to regulate the use of photograph images of Scottish Rite scenery in publications throughout the Northern and Southern Jurisdictions. Both Supreme councils would implement legislation to limit the amount of visual information that was released to the general public. In other words, they were trying to keep certain elements “secret,” noting that too much was being “shared” with the general public. Up to that time, pictures of Scottish Rite scenery were included not only in souvenir programs for Scottish Rite reunions, but also in newspaper articles. For example, there were photographs of two degree settings published in the “Topeka State Journal” depicting the Egyptian and Peristyle settings for the 31^st and 18^th degrees, respectively ( 30 Oct. 1909, page 6). In 1909 Grand Commander James D. Richardson called for a stop to this practice at the Biennial Session, citing legislation that had already been implemented in the Northern Jurisdiction. From this point on, the publishing of photographs depicting Scottish Rite degree productions or scenery was strictly forbidden.

This legislation mostly worked until the 1970, and is now impossible in the age of social media where most Scottish Rite Masons have a camera on their phone. Today there are photos of degree work all over social media – scenes from reunions on Facebook posts, tweets and instagrams of Masons in costume. It is just too tempting for members not to post pictures of things they love.

However, 110 years ago, it was an entirely different issue when Grand Commander James D. Richardson realized that they needed to pull on the reigns of something that was becoming a runaway issue. In the section “Programmes of Reunions. Etc.” of the 1909 Transactions of the Supreme Council (page 64) Grand Commander Richardson commented,

“The inspection of the programmes published by some of our subordinate bodies announcing reunions, etc., and which are sent broadcast throughout the country, I think, will show that the form or ceremony conferring Degrees is advertised by illustrations in these programmes to an improper extent. Many of them are works of art and of exquisite taste. I have no desire to stop, or even discourage this attractive style of advertising, but am of the opinion that greater care should be exercised in the matter than is at present observed. When I was at the session of the Northern Supreme Council, September 1908, I heard with interest the discussion on this subject by Bro. Palmer in his Allocution. He had had his attention called to it by a request for permission to publish in a programme the photographs of the casts of some Degrees. I quote a portion of his reply to this request, as follows:

‘I have to say in reply that the rituals of the Scottish Rite Degrees, like those of all other Degrees in Freemasonry, are secret in all respects. The rituals of Freemasonry constitute its methods of teaching great truths to those who apply for and are found worthy to receive them. These rituals and methods of communicating them to those who have been duly chosen to receive them, in my judgment, rank with secrets of Freemasonry and should be most carefully guarded. No part of the forms or ceremonies connected with the conferring of Degrees, or any of them, or any part thereof, should be published or exhibited to those Masons, either by photographs, written or printed circulars, or advertisements in newspapers, either before or after the Degree or Degrees shall be conferred, and being of this opinion, I was obliged to decline to comply with the courteous request.’

This portion of the address was referred to committee. The committee reported the resolution which was adopted, and which declared, “That it is not permissible to print, publish, distribute, or exhibit any illustration of any part of the rituals, form, or ceremonies, connected with the conferring of degrees of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, or any of them, or any part, or synopsis, in any manner of form, to the public, or to any one entitled thereto.”

I think it would be wise for the Council to adopt this, or a similar resolution. I am of the opinion that it would be well to require that all programmes and announcements of reunions should be submitted to the Inspector General, or Deputy of the Supreme Council in a jurisdiction where there is no Inspector-General for his approval before they are published and distributed.”

Fast forward ahead eight decades. A small troupe of theatre professors cross the country, documenting historic scenery collections in Scottish Rite theaters. This group, partially funded by USITT travel grants, included Lance Brockman, Larry Hill, Rhett Bryson, and Bruce Brockman. Whether together, or separate, each of the men spent hours gaining access to these significant historic scenery collections and documenting the painted scenery and stage effects.

Their visits caused quite a stir and soon a letter was sent out to every Scottish Rite Valley in the Southern Jurisdiction with the following announcement from the Grand Secretary General:

March 6, 1984

“TO ALL ACTIVES, DEPUTIES AND SECRETARIES

Dear Brother:

It has been brought to our attention that requests have been made in several Valleys in the Southern Jurisdiction to take photographs of the backdrops used in our ritualistic work. Further information has indicated that the individuals pursuing this project have no knowledge of Masonic ritual and consequently have engaged in useless and ignorant speculation concerning the uses to which these backdrops might be put. These discussions lead to derogatory criticism of Masonry.

My suggestion would be not ever to let anyone take photographs of any of the backdrops used in ritualistic work for other than Masonic purposes. This policy should eliminate future problems of this type.

With best wishes,

Cordially and fraternally yours,

Fred Kleinknecht

Grand Secretary General”

This action may have been the equivalent to throwing water on a grease fire. It was not out of spite that the men continued their documentation, but out of an understanding that the historic scenery collections were valuable cultural artifact shared by both the Fraternity and American public; each had a place within American history as well as Masonic history. Thankfully, the photographic documentation continued as Brockman trudged along with his research, soon facilitating the acquisition of two primarily Masonic scenery design collections – the Great Western Stage Equipment Company collection and the Holak Collection – for the Performing Arts Archives at the University of Minnesota from 1988-1991. These were the two collections that I processed with two Undergraduate Research Opportunity Grants while working on my undergraduate degree at the University of Minnesota.

In 1992, the symposium “Theatre of the Fraternity: Staging the Sacred Space of the Scottish Rite” was held from September 10 – 12 in Minnesota. This event was supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the University of Minnesota. Activities included a presentation at the Minneapolis Scottish Rite and even a trip up north to visit the Duluth Scottish Rite. The support for the “Theatre of the Fraternity” continued and by 1996, the touring museum exhibit “Theatre of the Fraternity: Staging the Ritual Space of Freemasonry, 1896-1929” opened at the Weisman Art Museum at the University of Minnesota before crossing the country. The exhibit was conceived and curated by Prof. C. Lance Brockman. A catalog was published in conjunction with the exhibit, including contributions by Kenneth L. Ames, William D. Moore, Mary Ann Clawson, Mark C. Carnes, C. Lance Brockman and Lawrence J. Hill. A few more years went by and many of these Masonic Designs became available for the general public in an online database (https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/scenicsearch). This was the project that I helped with in both the design, selection and entering of metadata for each item.

In additional to archival work, I entered into the fray thru the back door of the Scottish Rite – the stage door – restoring deteriorating scenery and replicating historic compositions for various Scottish Rite theaters across the country. However, it was never simply about the art, restoration, or historical scene painting techniques. Working as an assistant to Prof. Brockman, provided me with the incentive to use the subject for my doctoral dissertation: “Scenic Shifts Upon the Scottish Rite Stage: Designing for Masonic Theatre, 1859-1929” (UMN 2009). All the while, membership in the Scottish Rite continued to decrease. Scottish Rite Valleys began closing their buildings and moving to alternative locations. If the new space did not permit the use of their old scenery, entire collections were abandoned or disposed of over the years. In some cases, photographs of Scottish Rite scenery taken by a handful of theatre professors and practitioners are the only thing that remain of these glorious collections. More will disappear in the decades to follow and I have to wonder which ones will survive.

My concern for this loss of this history is one of the reasons that I now daily publish digital images of Scottish Rite scenery to my public FB group Dry Pigment. I hope to raise awareness of this valuable resource for not only theatre practitioners, but also historians. It is also why I pushed so hard to include a degree portfolio, featuring the twenty-nine settings of the 1912 Santa Fe Scottish Rite stage in “The Santa Fe Scottish Rite Temple: Freemasonry, Architecture and Theatre” (Museum of New Mexico Press, 2018). Full-page color plates of Scottish Rite degree productions, complete with costumed actors and props, may be all that is left someday. Believe me, convincing a secret society to publically share images of their scenery for all the world to see is no small feat, especially when I was very familiar that this fight had been occurring since 1909.

However, I am not alone, as many Scottish Rite Valleys across the country are attempting other ways to increase membership and sharing their stage. Opening up their doors to the public is one option to increase revenue with rentals. Here is an article in South Dakota magazine that explains why declining membership is prompting some Masons to shed the mystery. This is quite an interesting article that reads a bit like an advertisement:

https://www.southdakotamagazine.com/masons-losing-the-mystery

To be continued…

Part 625: The 1909 Scottish Rite Repeal

There were many resolutions passed at the 1909 Biennial Session of the Supreme Council of the Sovereign Grand Inspectors General of the Thirty-third Degree of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America. Topics discussed varied from translating the rituals into Spanish to the purchase of an automobile. One specific action is often cited as the most significant one of the session – the call for the “enlargement, or extension, of the present House of the Temple or for the erection of a new one.” A side note to this action is often attached to Grand Chancellor William Frank Pierce (Inspector General of California) who missed the session due to a family illness. Pierce met with Grand Commander James D. Richardson shortly after the close of the session and strongly advocated for the construction of a new House of the Temple instead of merely enlarging the current one.

Pierce was responsible for proposing an action four years earlier– one that was repealed during his absence in 1909. His resolution in 1905 gave the leaders of the Southern Jurisdiction an incentive to rapidly increase membership in each region, one that ultimately secured the much necessary funding to propose a new House of the Temple in 1909. Looking at both Pierce’s resolution and its 1909 repeal provides us with some of insight into the Scottish Rite during a period of unprecedented growth.

The 1905 “Transactions of the Supreme Council” reported:

“Inspector Pierce, from the Committee on Finance submitted the following:

Resolved, That each Sovereign Grand Inspector-General and each Deputy of the Supreme Council shall be entitled to receive as payment for expenses incurred in the discharge of his duties for the Rite, two dollars for each Thirty-second Degree conferred within his Jurisdiction.

Resolved, further, That said sums shall be immediately paid by the Secretary-General to the Sovereign Grand Inspector-General or Deputy of the Supreme Council, but only after all the reports have been received from and all payments have been made to the Supreme Council, as required now by the Statutes for the fees, dues, books and patents from his Jurisdiction.”

The purchasing power of $2 in 1905 is about $57.07 today.

Well, that was one way to make sure Scottish Rite Valleys paid their bills – giving the heads of each Orient an incentive to put pressure on the Valleys to pay their fees, dues, books and patents in a timely manner. From 1905-1909 sixteen new Scottish Rite stages were constructed and outfitted with scenery by Sosman & Landis. Similarly, Toomey & Volland studios outfitted 10 new Scottish Rite theaters during this time period. All told, twenty-six Scottish Valleys built new theaters across the country. That is significant growth in a five year period. A lot of money was collected from the Valleys as new members were initiated into the various Scottish Rite Bodies, with a percentage being passed along to the Supreme Council. So how much money are we really looking at? For example, the total Scottish Rite fees for the four petitions to become a 32^nd degree Mason in Wichita were $133.50:

Lodge of Perfection (4-14 degrees) $22

Chapter Rose Croix (15-18 degrees) $25

Council Knight Kadosh (19-30 degrees) $30

Consistory (31-32 degrees) $56.50

The continued annual dues for each Scottish Rite Body were $1 per body, or $4 per 32^nd degree Mason annually.

 

We will start with a baseline number -the number of total men who became 32^nd degree Masons (being initiated into the Consistory) in 1904. Of the 53 Consistories in the Southern Jurisdiction during 1904, there was a gain of 3,426 32^nd degree Masons – so that many members paid a fee with their Consistory petition, after having already paid petition fees for the Lodge, Chapter and Council. This number was know to all the active SGIGs and Deputies when the resolution passed in 1905. The next, year 32^nd degree petitions numbered 3025, at $2 per incoming 32^nd degree Mason, $6,050 paid to the SGIGs and Deputies (today’s equivalent of approximately $173,000). I think of it as something similar to a sales commission.

By 1909 the number initiated into the Consistory that year was 4,602. If $2 was distributed to the SGIGs and Deputies for each new 32^nd degree Mason during 1909, that would be a total payment of to the various SGIGs and Deputies of $9,204.00, or today’s equivalent of almost $255,000. To put that amount in perspective, from membership dues alone, the Scottish Rite took in $102,202.75, today’s equivalent of $2,821,615.77.

In 1909 public school teachers were making $492/year, state and local government workers were making $699/year, and Health Services Workers were making $338/year. For the building trades, the hourly wage was $0.52/hour ($20/week), with the average hourly wage at $0.22/hour ($8/week). Butter was $0.39 per pound and eggs were $0.36 per dozen. Also keep in mind that the role of SGIG was often held in addition to a full-time profession.

In 1909, Inspector Cunningham, offered the following resolution which was adopted:

“Resolved, That the resolution adopted at the session of the council for 1905, providing that each Sovereign Grand Inspector-General and Deputy of the Supreme Council, shall be entitled to receive as payment for expenses incurred in discharging his duties for the Rite, two dollars for each Thirty-second Degree, conferred within his Jurisdiction, be and the same is hereby repealed.”

To be continued…

Part 624: The Scottish Rite, Southern Masonic Jurisdiction 1909

For me, it is hard not to look at the Scottish Rite during the first two decades of the 20^th century with out thinking of a line from the musical “Hamilton,” – history has its eyes on you. A similar sentiment was expressed in 1909 by then Grand Commander James D. Richardson. He stated the following during his Allocution, “The Rite is in our hands now, and those who are to succeed us will have the right to hold us to strict account for our faithfulness or unfaithfulness, for our wisdom or unwisdom, in passing it on to them. We are apt to flatter ourselves with the comforting thought that the Rite is in safe and sane hands, but it is the dangers of the future I would caution you against. It was a wise old Chinese philosopher, Lastsze, who said, “Contemplate a difficulty when it is easy, Manage a great thing when it is small.”

The Supreme Council of the Sovereign Grand Inspectors General of the Thirty-third Degree of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, for the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America, met in Biennial Session in Washington, D.C., on Monday, October 18, 1909. The Supreme Council was opened by Grand Commander James D. Richardson. Representatives from Supreme Councils in other countries, included England, Ireland, Canada, Columbia, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, Uruguay, Italy, Sweden, Greece, Denmark, Switzerland, and Belgium.

Richardson’s Allocution addressed the continued growth and expansion of the Scottish Rite:

“It is becoming a power in our land, but is really in its infancy. It struggled along for the first half of the last century with barely sufficient strength or vitality to prove that it was alive. The revival began nearly fifty years ago, but its progress for the quarter of a century following was slow and tedious. Within the past two decades of years a new light has shone upon us, and no man can foretell the greater glory that is to come to the Order. The marvelous progress we are witnessing year by year, and the greater power and influence that await the Rite in the future create the imperative call for the wisest and best men in the land. And as its power and influence increase, its duties and responsibilities will correspondingly grow. In order to grapple with them successfully, we must bring into our ranks, not only the best men of the country, but we must enlist in our service those of superior breadth of mind and strength of intellect. Men of talents, as well as men of honor, are required in our work. The Scottish Rite needs students and thinkers who are willing to serve, not merely in the routine of interpreting the degrees and exemplify in its Rituals, but in the development and in giving wise direction to its forceful power and influence” (Transactions of the Supreme Council, 1909, page 12).

Richardson continued, “At one city, and that not a large one, in a western state of our Jurisdiction, I was highly pleased to see the Governor of the State, the Judge of the United States Court and four or five judges of the state courts, including the Chief Justice, and two or three clergymen with several leading physicians and attorneys, all actively assisting in the degree work.” Richardson continued to list numerous examples of members with important political ties to the country. This was really no different than many other Masonic addresses to it membership.”

There was one more section that caught my attention, however, that acknowledged the continued search for members: “The time has passed, if it ever existed, when we needed to go forth on the hunt for members, in order that the Rite might be supported, and pay for its Temples. But the time has not passed, nor can I contemplate any future period, when will need not need men of brains, intellect, culture, and marked ability, men in the old Roman sense of the word vir. Of such men our ranks cannot be too crowded.

Many in the Scottish Rite realized that membership was booming and funds were rushing in like never before, allowing massive buildings to be constructed at an unprecedented rate. Would future funds be allocated to the maintenance and repair of those buildings, or become liberally wasted on temporal pleasures and projects? Would the Rite anticipate times of membership decline or economic disasters? Which Valleys would really plan for their future and the experience of future generations? Which Valleys would, “Contemplate a difficulty when it is easy” or “manage a great thing when it is small?” It is hard to understand the dynamics in each Valley, the individual power plays, or those who rose through the ranks to simply glorify themselves. Not everything makes its way into the history books or even the minutes. Many are silenced by those in power at the time.

Looking at the current state of many Scottish Rite Valleys, only a few truly looked toward the future with caution and conservative planning, investing in their building’s maintenance and financial stability to withstand future obstacles. One example is Omaha, Nebraska.

In 2019, many Scottish Rite Valleys are faring poorly or just hanging on by a thread, citing the crippling effects of a rapidly declining membership and the increased expenses of maintaining enormous buildings. Others are renovating their spaces and preparing for a sale to later downsize. More is being lost than gained and it is simply a waiting game. Knock on a door and document that scenery now, before it is too late.

To be continued…

Part 623: “Patron Saint” of the Scottish Rite

There was an interesting article that I stumbled across while looking for information about Scottish Rite theaters in Kansas. It concerned Gen. Albert Pike, Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite for the Southern Jurisdiction from 1859 until his passing in 1891. Born in 1809, Pike revised the Scottish Rite rituals in 1857, unifying the degrees. For those unfamiliar with the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry’s theaters and degree productions, this may help clarify why scenery was added during the mid-nineteenth century. Part of Pike’s ritual revision included specific decorations for the various apartments, or necessary settings for each degree. You see, the degree work often included dramatic sections.

Pike’s “Magnum Opus” was replicated in the Northern Jurisdiction by Charles T. McClenachan in his “The Book of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.” There is some debate regarding how much McClenachan directly copied from Pike that I won’t get into today. What McClenachan did add into his publication was illustrations of the various apartments, providing visual reference for those purchasing painted settings and draperies for their Scottish Rite lodge room, or stage.

Over time Scottish Rite legislation in both the Southern and Northern Jurisdictions mandated that five of the Scottish Rite degrees had to be conferred in “full form.” This indicated the mandated use of costumes, props and scenery to stage dramatic enactments of certain scenes. At first five in number, these degrees were referred to as “Indispensable” or “Obligatory” degrees and included the 4, 14, 18, 30 and 32. Increasingly theatrical interpretations with scenic elements were used in the center of the lodge room. This was similar to a “theatre in the round” production, with audience members on all four sides.

Soon, small elevated stages were added to include even more elaborate backings for the dramatic sections. For example, a cut out tomb might first be introduced as a profile piece, complete with flip jack, or booked sides. On a stage, the tomb would be painted on a backdrop, maybe even with wooden supports for a practical opening. Each tomb had the same characteristics, yet the presentation changed as the lodge room space was altered, eventually becoming a state-of-the-art theater with hundreds of seats. Simultaneously, the ritual work transitioned from initiating a single candidate to using an exemplar to represent an entire class of candidates in the various staged degree productions.

Pike was adamant, however, that the dramatic portions of each degree were NOT meant to be big melodramatic and theatrically staged affairs. After his passing in 1891, however, plans for Scottish Rite theaters throughout the Southern Jurisdiction immediately commenced with two of the first full-fledged stages being completed in Little Rock, Arkansas and Oakland, California during 1896. The Northern Jurisdiction (geographic region north of the Ohio River and East of the Mississippi) had been constructing Scottish Rite theaters since the 1860s. The degree productions proved time and time again to be an incentive for Blue Lodge Masons to join the Scottish Rite.

With that little bit of background about Grand Commander Pike, here is a wonderful article published in the “Evening Kansasan-Republican on Dec. 29, 1909, celebrating the 100^th birthday of Pike (page 1).

Honor “Patron Saint”

—-

Scottish Rite Masons Observe Centenary of General Albert Pike

Washington, D.C., Dec. 29:-Scottish Rite Masons everywhere unite today in paying honor to the memory of Gen. Albert Pike, known as the “patron saint” of Scottish Rite Masonry, on the one hundredth anniversary of his birth. Plans for a widespread observance of the centenary were perfected at the meeting of this city last October of the supreme council of Scottish Rite Masons for the Southern jurisdiction. In further commemoration of the anniversary the supreme council has distributed among its members two hundred medals, bearing an image of the head and bust of General Pike and with an appropriate inscription.

Though General Pike is best remembered for his services to the Masonic fraternity, these do not by any means constitute his only claim to fame. In the course of his stirring career he fought with distinction in two wars, attained national prominence as a journalist and was known as one of the most able lawyers in his day. He also found time to write much credible poetry.

General Pike was a product of Massachusetts and in his youth attended Harvard University and subsequently taught school at Newburyport. At the age of 21 he went West and engaged in exploring the country. In 1832 he located in Arkansas, where he taught school for a time and then engaged in newspaper work. In 1835 he was admitted to the bar. Upon the outbreak of the Mexican war he recruited a company of cavalry, which he led at the battle of Buena Vista. He returned to his extensive law practice in 1849, and in 1853 transferred his office to New Orleans, returning to Arkansas in 1857. As attorney for the Choctaw Indians, he obtained the award of nearly $3,000,000 from the United States Government.

At the beginning of the Civil war, he was appointed Confederate commissioner to negotiate treaties of alliance with the Indians. He was appointed a brigadier-general in the Confederate

Army and took the leading part in the battles of Pea Ridge and Elkhorn. In 1866 he removed to Memphis, where he edited a newspaper and two years later he came to Washington to practice law.

General Pike was grand commander of the supreme council of the 33^rd degree of Masons, and was also grand commander of the royal order of Scottish Rite Masons. He compiled numerous Masonic rituals and also wrote a famous reply to Pope Leo XIII’s tirade against Masonry.”

Not everything in the article is correct, by it paints a pretty picture of Pike. Keep in mind that 1909 was a period of unprecedented membership growth in the Southern Jurisdiction and Scottish Rite theater construction was booming throughout to country. Scottish Rite Valleys in the Western region of the Southern Jurisdiction were surpassing their eastern counterparts in terms of membership and funding, especially in Kansas. There was space to build massive structures in a region of seemingly unlimited resources. For Scottish Rite Masonry, theatrical interpretations of degree work became the proverbial “goose that laid the golden egg.” Would Pike have approved of the ever-increasing stage effects and settings to accompany the degrees? No.

Pike spoke out against the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction’s performance of staged degree productions throughout his lifetime. In his 1882 Allocution, Pike stated, “The Rite in this Jurisdiction is a Rite of instruction, and not of scenic pomp and stage-show.” Pike also said, “I can not conceive of a more useless occupation than the arranging and performing of degrees, neither the effect nor the purpose of which is to make men wiser or better, but which are acted as melodramas, to gratify an aesthetic taste and please the imagination, like the pageantry of cardinals and orioles.”

That being said, men joined in droves and loved the Scottish Rite productions. After all, everyone had a chance to become a star.

To be continued…