Copyright © 2020 by Wendy Waszut-Barrett
In 1904 Moses left a successful New York partnership in 1904; this was the business endeavor with William F. Hamilton, Moses & Hamilton. Sosman placed a series of incentives to draw Moses back to Chicago that included $5,000 in stock and a position as vice-president. Additionally, he also assumed all control over design, construction, painting, and installation at the firm. When Sosman passed away in 1915, Moses was elected president. Unfortunately, that was right in the midst of a challenging period, WWI, a measles outbreak, the Spanish Flu and a recession. It seemed that everything was falling apart and the demand for painted scenes was beginning to diminish nationwide.
By the summer of 1918, working at Sosman & Landis became untenable. On September 1, 1918, Thomas G Moses resigned as the president of Sosman & Landis, and started working for New York Studios, the eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis. New York Studios was run by David H. Hunt. By the end of 1918, Moses wrote, “I am afraid that I will not be satisfied with my new deal.” Part of the problem was securing a studio space. Add in the fact that Moses never liked Hunt to begin with and his new employment was doomed from the start. Hunt consistently promised big and delivered small; Moses really should have known better by this point in his career.
During the fall of 1918 Moses hoped to line up a few projects along the west coast. Of possible California living, he wrote, “Mama and I would like to go out there. The hardest part of that will be the giving up of the old home and moving away from all the friends and children, but I don’t think it would take all that much coaxing to have the children move after us, which would all be fine. If I could only get a financial settlement with Sosman and Landis Company, we would go to California this winter.”
Needless to say, he remained in Chicago for the winter. His New York Studios projects ended up being built and painted in the Peltz & Carson shops. Of the experience, Moses wrote, “…rather hard to do in the Peltz and Carson Studio on account of the low ceilings, being obliged to paint one part on the upper floor and the balance on the lower floor. The studio was always warm and dry; in fact, too warm at times, which was almost as bad as not being warm enough.”
Of the search for a better studio space during the spring of 1919, Moses commented, “We looked at several buildings for a studio, but none seemed right to fill the bill. The only way to get one and have it right is to build one.” Early on, Sosman & Landis built a deluxe studio that was often toted as the largest one in the United States. When their main studio could not accommodate all projects, Sosman & Landis rented a series of spaces that they referred to as “annex studios.” Although New York Studios had long been marketed as the eastern affiliate of Sosman & Landis, there were never the funds to build a permanent structure for scenic work. In the end Moses severed his relationship with New York Studios in 1919.
By summertime, Moses wrote, “A new contract was entered into between the Chicago Studios and myself for one year. I hope it will prove to be a paying one in which I participate in the profits and a raise in salary, which means my old salary of $100.00 and a bonus.” This means that when he left Sosman & Landis to work with New York Studios, he took a pay cut. His base salary returned to normal when he began working for Chicago Studios.
About this time, The Chicago Studios placed a want ad in the “Chicago Tribune” on Sept. 13, 1919: “MEN – YOUNG. TO LEARN THEATRICAL scene painting; excellent opportunity for those inclined. The Chicago Studios, 15 W. 20th-st” (page 21).
By Nov. 1, 1919, the want ad in the “Chicago Tribune” was a little more descriptive:
“MEN-YOUN, BETWEEN THE AGES OF 16 and 21 to learn to paint theatrical scenery; must start in as paint boy and work up; salary to start $15 per week; an excellent opportunity for one who wishes to learn the trade. Apply Chicago Studios 15 W. 20th-st” (page 25).
It is difficult to track down information for The Chicago Studios; much has to do with the name. Similar to New York Studios, the firm’s name is also used to denote location of other businesses. For example, in 1919, newspapers credited scenery to the Chicago Studio of Sosman & Landis. Essanay Motion Picture company also referred to their Chicago Studio. And on top of everything else, there was also another Chicago company named “Chicago Studio,” one that specialized in music.
To be continued…
