Evelyn E. Livingston Furman credits
J. B. Lamphere, as creating the Tabor Opera House drop curtain in 1879. In her
publication, “The Tabor Opera House, a Captivating History,” she notes that
Lamphere was a prominent New York and Philadelphia artist, writing that he was “one
of the most prominent artists in the west.”
I have not been able to uncover any mention of a scenic artist named J.
B. Lamphere, and Furman did not credit her source. However, there was a James
E. Lamphere working as a fresco artist in Denver during 1879. This is probably the
same Lamphere mentioned by Furman. Lamphere
likely decorated the Tabor Opera House, but I question whether he painted the scenery.
The 1879 Denver Directory lists James
E. Lamphere as a frescoe painter and grainer.
The listing records his working for C. A. Treat, a wallpaper and sign
works company located at 306 15th St. in Denver (Western Magazine,
Vol. 4, 1880, page 5). That year,
Lamphere was residing at the West Lindell Hotel. All things considered,
Lamphere’s connection to Leadville remained strong and he even married a local
girl. On January 1, 1881, the “Leadville Daily Herald” reported that a James E.
Lamphere married Mary S. Faxon (nee Ainsworth) in 1880; they were listed with
all the other couples married that year (1 Jan. 1881, page 5). It is possible
that Furman conflagrated Lamphere and Burcky, as both Lamphere and Burcky had
Denver and Leadville connections.
In regard to the new Tabor Opera House in Leadville, it is possible that
Lamphere solely decorated the auditorium of the Tabor Opera House and Henry E. Burkey
painted the scenery for the stage; Burcky was later credited with the Tabor
Opera House scenery in Harry Miner’s Directory (1884).
Lamphere was a regional decorator and Burcky was a well-known itinerant
scenic artist. As theaters popped up across the western plains, scenic
artists followed an unending source of income, as these new performance venues
always demanded stock scenery. Although Leadville was beyond the reach of any
railroad line in 1879, the owner, Horace Tabor, enjoyed ample funding to
transport any good or service to this remote mountain theater.
Most stock scenery collections were manufactured on site
over the course of weeks in the 1870s, if not a full month. In many cases, the
scenic artist was also a stage carpenter or mechanic who designed and installed
the stage machinery. A scenic artist could complete the entire project with the
help of an assistant, even an enthusiastic and talented local. The first aspect
to any project on site was the construction of a paint frame, and then scene
after scene was rapidly produced.
I cannot imagine that Horace Tabor
would have hired a local fresco painter from Denver and not a professional
scenic artist, especially when other Leadville theaters were hiring and crediting
new scenes to well known scenic artists.
By 1881, a scenic artist named Carter was involved in a deadly attack in
Leadville (13 Jan 1881). That same year, scenic artist George Heiman created
the stage scenery for Leadville’s Academy of Music; he was also a nationally
acclaimed scenic artist. The local paper referred to Heiman in Leadville as “a gem,” adding, “and in fact so are all his
designs about the building. He is evidently the man for who Colorado has been
waiting for years” (Leadville Daily
Herald, 20 March, 1881). Heiman was also credited as being the scenic artist for
the Madison Square Theatre in New York (Leadville Daily Herald, 25 March 1881).
Burkey [sic.] was listed as the scenic artist at Leadville’s
Tabor Opera House in “Harry Miner’s American Dramatic Directory” for the
1884-1885 season. He was also noted as the scenic artist for the Tabor Grand
Opera in Denver and Denver’s Academy of Music. I am sure that these three
listings, despite slight spelling variations are the same artist, Henry E.
Burcky. Burcky was not a Leadville
local; he was an itinerant scenic artist, well travelled and well known across
the country by 1879.
Theatrical guides are tricky, as there is no distinction
between a scenic artist that worked at one theater, versus one that was
credited with delivering stock scenery to several theaters. If a scenic artist
is listed at more than one venue, especially in different states, it is likely
that he delivered stock scene to that venue instead of working at the venue. I
believe that Burcky painted the roll drops, borders, wings and shutters for the
first stage at the Tabor Opera House, and that Lamphere decorated the Tabor
Opera House’s auditorium. We learn much by just looking at the 1879 photograph
and interior set. Both the skills of a fresco artist and scenic artist are featured
in this photo.
For additional installments, go to www.drypigment.net
The opening of the Tabor Opera House
in Leadville, Colorado, made news across the country. Even in Camden, New
Jersey, the “Morning Post” reported, “Two years ago [Leadville] contained a
half dozen log cabins, and to-day it is the second city in the State, with a
population of 30,000, and doing an immense mercantile business, having finely
laid out streets, and some very large buildings, the finest of which, just
completes, is the Tabor Opera House, costing $30,000, besides four other
theatres, all doing a good business. There are five first class hotels.” (24
Nov. 1879, page 1). With five theaters in town, even if there was only one “legitimate”
one, each stage still needed some type of scenery or backing.
The earliest mention of the Tabor
Opera House in any American theatrical guide appears in 1882, “Jno. B. Jeffery’s
Guide and Directory.” Less than five years old, the Tabor Opera House was
listed in the guide as one of three theaters in Leadville, alongside the
Academy of Music and the Grand Central Theatre.
The Academy of Music opened on March 28, 1881 and listed a seating
capacity of 859 and “full stock of scenery.” There were no specifics given
about the Tabor Opera House other than a seating capacity of 1,000 (page 12). By
1889, the entry was altered to note that the Tabor Grand Opera House “seats
750. A. H. Andrews’ opera chairs.” Jeffery’s Guide only provided limited
information, so I checked out the other theatrical guides.
Harry Miner’s American Dramatic
Directory for the Season of 1884-1885 gave a little more information about the
Tabor Opera House. This listing was published only five years after the venue was
built, noting that the size of the stage was 34’ x 60 feet and the proscenium
opening was 17’-0” high by 23’-0” wide. The height from the stage to grooves
was 16’-0” and the height from stage to rigging loft was 19’-0.” There were
twelve sets of scenery credited the scenic artist “Burkey, of the Tabor Grand,
Denver.” It was actually Henry E. Burcky, the scenic artist who created scenery
for Tabor’s second theater – the Tabor Grand Opera in Denver, Colorado. Burcky
did not live in Colorado, he was simply an itinerant artist with permanent
residence was in Chicago.
By 1896 the Tabor Opera House had
changed hands and was known as the Weston Opera House. It was listed in Julius
Cahn’s Theatrical Guide for the 1896 season, noting a seating capacity of 900,
but no mention of a scenic artist. The width of the proscenium was listed as
20’-0 wide, with 57’-0” between side walls and 47’-0” between girders. The
grooves were still listed as a height of 16’-0”, with stage to rigging loft at
19’-6”; not much had changed beyond cramming more people into the auditorium. The
listing noted five grooves for the stage. These measurements would remain
constant until the opera house was renovated in 1901.
When the Leadville Elks purchased
and renovated the building in 1901, the stage house was dramatically
enlarged. Now known as the Elks Opera
House, the proscenium width greatly increased from 20’-0” wide to 30’-0” wide.
The height increased from 16’-0” to 24’-0”. The original height of 19’-0” to
the rigging loft increased to 50’-0” and a fly gallery was added at 22’-0.”
This necessitated the replacement of original scenery, consisting of wings,
shutters, and roll drops, with fly scenery. Theatrical directories after 1902 specified
“no grooves.”
Over the years, there were at least three
scenery collections delivered to the Tabor Opera House in Leadville, Colorado: 1879,
1888, and 1902. I am going to try and examine
the various scenery installations and theatrical manufacturers over the next
few posts.
When the Tabor Opera House opened in
1879, the “Chicago Tribune” included an article about Leadville, Colorado (24
Dec, 1879, page). In the section titled “ Legitimate Drama,” the article
reported, “It has often been asserted that in Leadville only the low variety
shows could flourish, and that a first-class theatre could not be supported.
Lieut. Gov. Tabor, W. H. Bush, and others of our leading citizens, having a
better faith, accepted the challenge, erected a substantial and ornate
building, supplied it with all the required fixtures and appliances, seated it
with the latest improved opera chairs from the shops of you’re a. H. Andrews
& Co., and finally engaged a first-class company, marshaled by Colorado’s
favorite actor, J. S. Langrishe, and, with the genial Lou C. Leonard as
treasurer, they opened it several weeks ago. Full houses have ever since
greeted the players, and endorsed the enterprise. The auditorium, without
having the florid gildings of many Eastern cities, is neat, graceful, and
complete, – the only defacement being a picture of Gov. Tabor over the drop
curtain, which is rather a caricature than a portrait.”
Evelyn E. Livingston Furman
describes the 1879 scenery and drop curtain in her book, “The Tabor Opera House.”
Furman moved to Leadville in 1932 and took a great interest in the history of
the theater and Tabor family. However, she was not a scenic artist nor theatre
professional. She may not have
accurately dated all of the scenery while documenting it. Furman describes the composition
of the 1879 front curtain as a “glorious” mountain scene with castle on a hill,
stream at the mountain base and a road winding away to a distant canyon. This
was a common composition for the time. The only missing elements not described
my be an ornate frame around the central composition, painted draperies and
center medallion of some sort to identify the location, or a cameo. She further
described that at the top the scene was a life-sized portrait of Horace Tabor,
which correlates to the “Chicago Tribune” article’s mention of his portrait.
Now this is where I begin to disagree with the published history. Furman credits J. B. Lamphere, as the creator of the piece and comments that he was a prominent New York and Philadelphia artist, and “one of the most prominent artists in the west.” I have not been able to uncover any mention of a well-known scenic artist named Lamphere to validate any of her statements. In fact, Lamphere is the first scenic artist that I have been unable to track down at all. I have not located him in theatrical guides or newspaper articles, which is extremely odd. In the 1870s and 1880s, scenic artists made top billing in newspapers and programmes. If Lamphere enjoyed any notoriety, especially in the major East Coast cities, there would be some mention of him. Who I did find connected with the manufacture of scenery for the Tabor was Henry E. Burcky. More on him tomorrow.
By 5:30 P.M. on February 7, 2020, we had catalogued over 95
scenic pieces, as well as setting up four interior settings. The snow was coming down harder than ever as
we crossed the street to the Silver Dollar Saloon. Over the course of five days,
we shifted, documented, and reorganized all of the historic scenery on the
Tabor Opera House stage, with the exception of the contemporary stage settings.
We did not have an opportunity to document those painted after 1980.
The 1902 historic settings that we assembled included a center
door fancy, Gothic interior, plain setting and prison scene. There were partial
collections that we did not have try to assemble this time. This number does
not include any of the original scenery delivered to the opera house before the
renovation in 1901, pieces that are currently stored in the attic.
Of all the historic scenery collections in the United States
that I have encountered, this is the most unique. There are others that are
larger and more impressive, as well as others that have been moved to off site
storage units to preserve their posterity. But the scenery at the Tabor Opera House
spans decades and remains on site despite new owners and building renovations.
I have written extensively about the resale of scenery collections throughout
the late-nineteenth and early twentieth century, using examples across the
country. Used scenery ended up in new locations for many reasons. For example, used scenery was left at the
final destination after a touring show closed. Used scenery from touring shows
was purchased by smaller venues in need of stock scenery, or those expanding
their original stock. Used scenery was
retrofitted and sold to new theaters without their knowledge. In other words, the
purchase of used scenery was not an uncommon practice. In the past three decades, I have repeatedly
identified used scenery collections still in use at various venues.
In many ways the Tabor Opera House exemplifies what occurred
across the country during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Like
many other performance venues, they continued to update their stock scenery,
yet never really replaced it. What makes the Tabor collection remarkable,
however, is that everything is still on site despite the venue changing hands
and undergoing extensive renovations and structural changes. Even scenery that
was manufactured for a previous stage, one without a fly loft, was retained
after a remodel. I cannot wrap my mind around the fact that the
wing-and-shutter scenery was not thrown away, given away, sold, or repurposed.
This is extremely atypical, as their old scenery designed for grooves was not ever
retrofitted for the new fly system, just kept.
Keep in mind that the entire building was renovated in 1901,
both the auditorium and stage house were enlarged. The roof was ripped off and a fly loft added;
yet the smaller scenery designed for grooves remained on site, unaltered and
tucked away. For what purpose, and why
did they just store it in the attic? Sentimental attachment? Too hard to dispose of at the time? We may never know the reason as to why the
original scenery was kept.
I have often referenced used scenery collections, such as the
1901 scenery and stage machinery at the Scottish Rite Theatre in Little Rock.
Two decades after the original installation of this collection by Sosman &
Landis, it was transported and installed at the Scottish Rite theater in
Pasadena, California, where it is still used today. That scenery was manufactured around the same
time as the Tabor Opera House’s center door fancy set. Other examples of used
scenery collections that I have explored include Salina, KS, Yankton, SD, and
Deadwood, SD. Used scenery and stage machinery were carefully transported,
refurbished and installed in second, and sometimes third, venues. We were an
industry built on the repurposing of not only ideas, but also artifacts.
And then there is the sheer volume of scenery at the Tabor
Opera House in Leadville, Colorado. There are almost 100 historic pieces on
stage and dozens more in the attic, representing a scope of American scenic art
in one venue that is unheard of. The Tabor’s 1879 through 1902 scenery
collections that I examined this week did not include all of the modern scenery
manufactured for melodramas and community productions after 1980.
The Tabor Opera House is a living history museum, unlike any
of its kind in the United States, with wonderful examples of the ever-shifting stage
aesthetic, all situated in one place. This is a destination location for theatre
historians, practitioners, and art enthusiasts to visit. But the venue needs
financial help, here is the link if you want to contribute to a good cause, as
volunteer labor can only do so much: https://www.taboroperahouse.net/donate
Then we top off this remarkable collection with its
extensive artistic provenance and stewardship. In 1933, the 1902 scenery collection
was catalogued, by theatre folk who knew what they doing; the project was led
my Muriel Sibell Wolle. The fact that this 1933 documentation is digitally
accessible to the general public is also unusual in its own right. We have
dozens of performing arts collections across the country that are almost
impossible to access for general research without a site visit.
The preservation of the Tabor Opera House’s physical
structure and artifacts were later spearheaded by a Minnesota school teacher,
who purchased and began the preservation of the building in 1955. Then her
daughter, Evelyn E. Livingston Furman, included the history surrounding the
construction of the Tabor Opera House in a series of books.
The United States has thousands of examples of historic
scenic art collections located in opera house, social halls, cinemas, fraternal
theaters, and other performance venues.
We have examples of painted scenery that range from fraternal ceremonies
to famous film sets, yet nothing can compare to what is owned by this small
mountain community in Leadville, Colorado, when considering historic scope.
The Tabor Opera House scenery collection has been stored in
less than ideal conditions, complete with roof leaks and renovations. That
being said the low humidity and high elevation helped a lot. The scenery has also
seen plenty of use over the past century; maybe this is why the collection has
been treasured and kept over the years.
In many ways, what is the point of preserving historic scenery if it is
never used again? For a painted scene to remain on a roll, or tacked to the
wall of a lobby diminishes the overall significance of a piece. It is like
taking off the original frame of an artwork, one carefully selected by the
artist to display his work. The theater’s environment is intricately linked to
the scenic art; these pieces were designed and manufactured to be viewed on a stage,
placed a specific distance from the viewer.
To observe them up close in a museum destroys the illusion and purpose
of each piece.
I have a month’s worth of work left to go to complete the
documentation of the piece that have been catalogued, each page based on my site
notes and photographs. The easy part of the project is done. There are condition reports, historical
analyses, replacement appraisals, and a collections care document to prepare. It is a daunting task, especially knowing
that more clues remain hidden in the attic of the Tabor Opera House. The last
time the collection was catalogued was in 1933 and I have big shoes to fill. At
that time, the sets were documented in their entirety, but the individual state
of each artifact was not examined. Muriel Sibell Wolle looked at the big
picture, and this was very important for all research that would follow. Her
“big picture” provided a guide map for those wishing to understand the history
of scenery at the Tabor Opera House.
Without her studies, my work this week would have been difficult at
best; I would have been working “blind.”
In addition to Wolle’s contribution is the continued stewardship
of those who followed her, including volunteers for this project. The careful
documentation and cataloguing of all on site artifacts is just one more chapter
in the Tabor Opera House history. One small example of this stewardship
included the actions of volunteer Robyn; she found an old stage brace marked “Tabor
Opera House” at a local antique store, purchased it and returned it home to the
theater. All of the artifacts are finding their way home, as if drawn by a
magnetic force.
The preservation of the old theater has remained a community
endeavor since its inception. Even in the 1890s, when Horace Tabor had to let
his prized possession go, there were those in the community who took over the
care of his grand building. The Tabor Opera House, Augusta Tabor, Baby Doe and
the Matchless Mine are all entwined with the captivating history of Leadville.
Both Leadville natives and transplants have equally contributed to the
preservation of this remarkable building.
I began our final day at the Tabor Opera House in a bit of a
panic, as there was still so much left to catalogue. By the end of the previous
day, we all realized that there was much more flat stock than anyone
anticipated. There is nothing like thinking this is the last flat against the
wall, and they just keep coming. My initial hope was that we could assemble all
the interior settings, but soon realized that I would have to settle for three at
most. Some of the settings were incomplete due to repainting too, so I was
unsure if there were complete sets.
…and then there was the weather…
Leadville, Colorado, was in the midst of a huge snowstorm
that would deposit up to to 51-inches of snow in neighboring areas. Just trying
to get out of the house that morning was a challenge, as I waded through snow
up to my knee to the car. I had been walking the half block to the opera house,
but accepted the ride offered in anticipation of the weather the night before.
A few of us decided to meet a little early and photograph
the grand tormentors that we discovered the Thursday evening, getting a head
start. The grand tormentors matched the first piece we examined on Monday – the
grand border. The classic red draperies framing the marble columns matched
those documented earlier that week.
There are six pieces with the same red draperies: the two folding
grand tormentors with doors; three grand borders, and the front drop curtain.
All four elements are not of the same vintage. Before looking at the individual
pieces, here are the technical specifications for the venue listed in Julius
Cahn’s Official Theatrical Guide for the 1903-1904 Season: Width of proscenium,
30’-0”; height of the proscenium 24’-0”; distance from the curtain line to
footlights, 5’-0”; height to rigging loft 41’-0”’and the depth under stage,
12’-0”.
The largest red-drapery grand border is over 44-feet long, much too large for the proscenium. This piece
has five holes for operating lines. Common installation practices at the time for
a proscenium this size, such as the Tabor Opera House, would only demand three
holes for three operating lines.
The second matching border with red draperies is similar,
but shorter; an appropriate length for the 30’-0” wide proscenium.
The third red drapery border is too small for the proscenium
and the oldest. It has the similar red curtains, matching the two highly ornate
grand tormentors that we photographed in the morning. These three pieces are stunning.
The front curtain (drop curtain) was initially created without
the red draperies. Upon close inspection, it is obvious that the red draperies were
added after the entire drop was complete. The painting style for the red
draperies on the front curtain is quite crude in comparison to the rest of the
composition.
It is a challenge to appropriately date all of the pieces. I
think that the oldest pieces are the latter three mentioned, the matching
ornate border and grand tormentors. These pieces were delivered prior to the that
were addition of the fly loft The side doors allowed promoted action to occur
downstage of the plaster line while a scene change was occurring upstage.
The painting of the matching border and tormentors are
stunning, a much higher quality than the two other borders, yet the red
draperies were also added here too. The tassels at the top of the tormentors
are not of the same quality or technique as those incorporated into the bottom
ornament.
I believe that the really long border, shorter border and
draperies on the front curtain were added at the same time, 1902 or slightly
later, but a scenic artist working on site at the theater after the delivery.
These latter three pieces were painted to match the original tormentors. In
fact, I think that the tops of the grand tormentors, the drop curtain draperies
and the two borders (large and small, not highly ornate) were painted at the
same time.
The quality of painting is all over the map at the Tabor
Opera House. I am still stunned that we
uncovered three distinct collections – 1879, 1888 and 1902. The 1902 scenery
delivery included used pieces from an unidentifiable venue, but one previous to
1902. The 1879 collection (which will be catalogue later this spring) and the
1888 collection were created prior to the enlargement of the stage and addition
of the fly loft. The 1879 and 1888 scenery were produced for a stage with
grooves. The 1902 scenery was produced for a stage house with fly loft.
The majority of 1879 wing and shutter scenery is in the
attic of the Tabor Opera House. A few elements of the 1888 scenery by Frank Cox
are stored on the stage, identifiable by the strap sheaves on the bottom of
rolling flats, intended to accompany the original grooves.
The 1902 scenery is all on the stage and includes several
interior settings. These set flats are interchangeable and lashed together.
Some of the scenes have been repainted over the decades. The 1902 collection includes a yellow center
door fancy, a pink center door fancy, a green Gothic interior, two plain
interiors and a prison. The prison scene is back-painted on one of the plain
interiors. In addition to these interior settings are large set pieces that
include wood wings, rustic huts, garden balustrades and city buildings. Only
three set pieces stored on the stage currently roll, dating from 1888; a tree
profile and two city wings were constructed to slide in grooves.
The volunteer crew returned to the Opera House after eating at the Silver Dollar Saloon on the afternoon of Feb. 6, 2020. The fancy door interior setting assembled that morning was slowly replaced with a gothic interior.
As we “oohed” and “awed” each piece coming out of the pile, nothing could prepare us for the repainted flats. As we started to open one large tri-fold flat the group shouted in unison “Noooo!” The historic scene had been painted over with white latex, spattered with an array of colors. In other instances, the historic flat retained the original painted molding and cornices, but the walls were repainted with bright pink and dark blue stripes. Odd art adorned the repainted walls too, ranging from cupids and satyrs to old photographs and illustrations of an ear. One flat had been used for masking when painting something else brown. It seemed just tragic, and I feared that we would continue to encounter repainted piece after piece. I am sure that the individuals who painted over the original artwork had no idea of their significance.
In the end, we were unable to set up the Gothic scene due to
missing pieces and feared that the missing flats had fallen victim to an
amateurs brush, yet there were piles of flats to go. With fifteen of us helping,
we eventually uncovered a jungle scene, three sets of wood wings, street
setting flats, cottages, rustic interiors, plain interiors, stone interiors and
so on; all as originally painted.
The greatest discovery, however, was a tree profile. Heavy and cumbersome, it overshadowed the
Sosman & Landis tag discovery on the previous day. On the back of the tree
flat was a cartoon depicting a scenic artist at work. The little artist, dressed in overalls and
holding a brush included a caption: “Frank Cox Scenic Artist Jan 88.” This was a huge discovery, as it meant this 1888
piece was likely part of a collection that was added to the 1879 scenery.
It was common for theaters to continually purchase scenery
over the decades, replacing drop curtains, flats and backdrops. What is
remarkable about this cartoon is that Cox became a very well known theatre
architect. I have written about Frank Cox and the Cox. Bros. Studio in the past
(see post # 310). Cox began his career as a New Orleans scenic artist,
transitioning into theatre architect by the 1890s. In 1890, Cox was still working as a scenic artist, decorator
and architect in the New Orleans area. He continued to work as a scenic artist
throughout the remainder of the nineteenth century and was credited as delivering
scenery to the Temple Theatre in Alton, Illinois (1899) and Klein’s Opera House
in Seguin, Texas (1903-1904). I had never encountered any examples of Cox’s
work until now.
In 1894, Cox designed the New Lyceum Theater in Memphis,
Tennessee. Thomas G. Moses provided the scenery for this venue, writing, “the architect insisted
on my work.” At the time, Moses was not working at Sosman & Landis. It was
only with Cox’s recommendation that Moses received the contract and not his
previous employer Sosman & Landis.
In regard to
the famous Cox family of scenic artists…
Frank, Eugene,
and Clark Cox who operated a scenic and fresco business known as Cox Bros. in
New Orleans. However, it was referred to
as “Frank Cox’s Studio at New Orleans,” him being the eldest and most
experienced. They had quite a large
staff by 1891 that included the scenic artist Emile Nippert and stage machinist
James A. Kee (Fort Worth Daily Gazette 11 August 1891, page 2). The Cox Bros.
studio was located in the Grand Opera House of New Orleans. Frank withdrew from the partnership in 1896,
but the partnership continued to operate under the same name of Cox Bros.,
despite Frank’s public declamation that the firm was dissolved. Eugene and Clark published a rebuttal,
wanting to make it “thoroughly understood” that they would continue to operate
the scenic and fresco business under the name Cox Bros. By the way, there appears to be no immediate
familial ties to the Jesse Cox Scenic Studio of Estherville.
Returning to
the tree profile piece, Frank Cox also put his name on the front. “Carved” into the painted tree is “F. Cox, W.M. and J.C.”
In terms of
“W.M.”, scenic artists that I know of who were working at that time include W.
Marshal, William Minor, William Mitchell, and William Morris. In terms of “J.C.”, scenic artists that I know
of who were working at that time include J. P. Cahill, John A. Collins, John
Constantine, J. H. Connolly, and Jesse Cox. It will be fun to uncover where the
artists may have been working in 1888.
We started the fourth day full of ambition. It was the first of two days to set up all of the interior settings. In the deep layer of flats against the upstage wall was an estimated four scenes. By that afternoon we would realize there were many more. Blissful in my ignorance that morning, I figured we would set up two scenes per day. We first set up the “Center Door Fancy,” being the first in the pile. It was a lovely series of flats depicting floral garlands on every wall panel.
While lashing the final flats together, one volunteer (Doug from Breckenridge) mentioned that there was a tag on the back of one flat. I raced over to the stage-right flat; full of excitement and knowing it was a shipping label. Expecting to see a Kansas City Scenic Co. tag, I was shocked to read “Sosman & Landis.”
What makes this find such a big deal for me is that Sosman
& Landis was deeply connected to both New York Studios and Kansas City
Scenic Co. They shared artists, designs
and projects. Having read about the regional affiliation between the studios, I
had uncovered very little concrete evidence beyond brief notes in Thomas G.
Moses’ memoirs and a few newspaper articles.
New York Studios was advertised as the eastern affiliate of
Sosman & Moses.
Kansas City Scenic Co. was listed as a western regional
office of Sosman & Landis.
Former Sosman & Landis employee, Lemuel L. Graham,
initially left Sosman & Landis to form Kansas City Scenic Co. in the
1880s. Former Sosman & Landis
employee, David H. Hunt, established New York Studios in 1910. There were
connections everywhere to accommodate the ever-increasing demand for painted
illusion.
I had always wondered how they handled the scenery being
manufactured and shipped from one studio while contracted with another. Even though the Elks Opera House (Tabor Opera
House) in Leadville, Colorado, contracted with the Kansas City Scenic Co. in
1902, a large chunk of scenery was shipped from the Sosman & Landis Studio
in Chicago. We discovered multiple shipping labels, and it is possible that
each piece came with two’ one on the top and one on the bottom. Salesman Fred
R. Megan, representing the Kansas City Scenic Co., handled the contract for the
Leadville delivery. At this time the firm was making inroads to the western
market. Megan later partnered with Thomas G. Moses, the final president of
Sosman & Landis, to form Moses & Megan Studio.
The American scenic studio system was one large family;
sometimes they quibbled and sometimes they shared, but all stayed within a
network beneficial to everyone. Theatre work was plentiful in 1902; demand
outweighed supply and much of the competition between studios was friendly.
Even though competing studios vied for the same projects, there was always more
work around the corner if one lost out to a competitor. Also, when too much work came in at once, it
was beneficial to have close ties to these same competitors when work needed to
be subcontracted, thus affiliations and regional connections were established.
I believe that this is what was happening from 1901-1903
with the Kansas City Scenic Co when they manufactured the scenery bound for
Leadville. In looking at the various
projects rolling into the Kansas City studio, the firm had more work than they
could handle and reached out to Sosman & Landis. The Sosman & Landis
flat construction for the center door fancy is identical to many of the other
scenes with the “Kansas City Scenic Co., Kansas City, MO” stencil.
Regardless of the scenery manufacturer, the center door fancy is absolutely stunning and completes the auditorium. The sheer beauty of the set, despite the visible deterioration and water damage, mesmerized the crew. In looking at the center door fancy and seeing my crew’s reactions, I realized that this was a wonderful marketing opportunity for the Tabor Opera House, so I decided to both video and live stream the moment. This is such a special venue, and I urge donations to their Tabor Opera House Preservation Foundation.
The Tabor Opera House has only one staff member who also gives tours; everyone else is a volunteer. There are two internationally significant scenery collections at this venue, and we are only uncovering one this time.
There is something magical about entering a historic stage
scene, whether you are a performer, technician or theatre enthusiast. Being surrounded by beautiful painting with
footlights before you and staring at the ornate auditorium is spellbinding. You
think of all the performers who stood in that exact same spot, surround by the
same within interior setting. Wile setting up all the scenery I contemplated
the various personalities who handled these same flats. Stepping back in the
past is a transformative experience. You are transported to another time and
share a moment with those who came before, some more famous that we could ever
imagine and others who changed the world.
And this was not the biggest discovery of the day. I will
describe what occurred after setting up the center door fancy tomorrow.
On my third day in Leadville, Colorado, I decided to walk to the Taber Opera House. My lodging is less than a block away. It felt a little brisk out, but I thought nothing of it as the sun was shining and I enjoyed the stroll. At the time, I did not realize it was 20 degrees below zero. Arriving a bit early, I had a chance to enjoy coffee and wait for the crew.
There were a few new faces, and after introductions, we discussed the day’s schedule. I wanted to finish all of the hanging scenery so that we could start on the interior sets tomorrow. Keep in mind that there are no counterweights to ease the burden of operating any line sets. We started with the heaviest piece, an unidentified framed drop that would take more than two sets of hands. From the stage floor we could tell that there was a medallion in the center, and my first thought was that it was an unfinished composition on the original paint frame for the stage. We soon discovered that it was a ceiling piece for the interior sets, complete with a hole in the center for lighting fixture. I have only seen historic set ceilings in photographs, never in person, so this was quite an exciting moment. It was wonderful to examine not only the painting but also the stage hardware. Also, at one point, the entire back had been backed with what looked like an advertisement poster.
Other scenes that we catalogued yesterday
morning included a wood cut drop, wood border, garden drop, landscape drop, and
the front curtain. We enjoyed a
family-style lunch again at the Silver Dollar Saloon, warming up and visiting.
After returning to the theater, we
completed all of the hanging scenes except one painted border. About three o’clock a voice called down from
the flies; Amy noticed a fabric roll attached the side of the pin rail and we
began to plan to lower it. As Carl began
rigging the drop, I began contemplating what the roll might be. A batten was
attached, but it was way too short for the proscenium opening. I began to speculate if it was the original
1879 front curtain, by why was it not upstairs with the rest of the painted
wings and borders. Not until I felt the roller, did I get pretty excited about
our discovery. The roller was quite old and the top batten made of 4-inch
rough-hewn lumber.
Sure enough, this was the same composition noted by Muriel Sibell Wolle
(1898-1977) as the “Palace Drop” in the
1933. This piece was documented as part of the Leadville Opera House Scenery
Project, 1933; the many materials now at the Denver Public Library. In 1933, a
group of students, a former Tabor stage manager, and professors documented the
opera house scenery. At this time, Wolle also sketched each set and made color
noted which were developed into large watercolor paintings. Here is a link to her rendition of the Palace
drop: https://digital.denverlibrary.org/digital/collection/p15330coll22/id/483 The 1933 project gives the
Tabor scenery collection an incredible amount of artistic provenance. It will also help determine what is missing
from the current inventory.
In
regard to the Palace Drop…I have mixed feelings about the painted composition
and its actual age. This original drop was purportedly lent to the Denver
Theatre for its opening of the famed 1932 “Silver Dollar” movie (https://immortalephemera.com/15370/silver-dollar-1932-edward-g-robinson/), a film was based on the David Karsner’s booko,
“Silver Dollar, the Story of the Tabors.” His publication told of the rise and
fall of Leadville’s Horace Tabor, and his two wives Augusta and Baby Doe.
Of
the Palace Drop: the roller, fabric, and batten are obviously old and pre-date
1900. The fabric is cotton sheeting, similar to the 1879 wing and shutter
scenery, with only a few pieces of linen. The Palace roll drop, however, does
not look like late nineteenth century stage scenery; there’s a “sharpness” to
the painting that I have not encountered in historic scenery from this period before.
My gut instinct tells me that the old drop was “touched up” while on loan in
1932, hence why much of it looks so new. There is a 1920s/1930s feel about it. In
other words, some well-meaning individual brightened the highlights, added a
few washes, and sharpened some of the painted detail. There is heavy-handedness
to the checkered floor that is simply odd. Overall, something just seems “off”
with the painting and everything is a little too clean for it to be that old.
With
many questions remaining unanswered, we finished work a little early. It was
nice to have a few hours off before heading out that evening. I was asked to
say a few words at an Elks meeting when the Tabor Opera House Preservation
Foundation received a $2,000 donation; just a couple statements about the
scenery project. I had never been to an Elks Lodge room or meeting before, so I
was intrigued and agreed to go. I spoke briefly about the significance of the
scenery purchased by the Leadville Elks in 1902, placing it within the context
of Kansas City Scenic Co. and the construction of other Elks Theaters during
the early twentieth century. Nice and short, because it was a very full day and
I am slowly running out of steam this week.
We started our second day
cataloguing the remainder of rolled scenery at the Tabor Opera House. Our focus was to complete the stack of rolled
borders and small profile pieces along the back wall before starting the hanging
scenes. The biggest project remains the numerous
interior set pieces along the back wall.
We had two projects occurring
simultaneously that morning. The first
was cataloguing the scenery as stated above. The second was removing two broken
battens from a rocky pass drop and a wood border. When we unrolled drops the previous day,
there were two with broken top battens. These ragged wooden edges were harming
the painted compositions and should not return to storage “as is.”. Although
not part of the project, I recommended that we remove the wood prior to
re-rolling. It was the perfect time to address the problem as we were slightly
ahead of schedule. It also gave the volunteers a chance to see how the sandwich
battens were assembled, a great learning experience for all.
When the Kansas City Scenic Company
shipped the painted settings from Kansas City, Missouri, to Leadville, Colorado
in 1902, the wooden battens were not attached. This was a standard practice at
the time. The paint fabric shipped in vertical rolls, with studio labels on the
exterior edge, noting location and subject.
The fabric seams for each drop were also vertical; horizontal seams did
not replace their early twentieth century predecessors until the 1920s. This is
not to stay there weren’t any scenes with horizontal seams, but the major
studios during the late-nineteenth and early twentieth century were using 36”
wide bolts of cotton sheeting and vertical seams for the majority of the stock
scenery installations. At the Tabor Opera House we located a few of the
shipping labels to verify this – still visible along the side edge of the
fabric written in charcoal. These labels included easy descriptors such as “Leadville
Front Drapery” or “Leadville Sky B” (B is for border). The placement along the
side of the drop meant that it was easily identifiable during shipping and
installation on site.
The lumber also shipped with the
company, even in areas abundant with sawmills. Scenery battens was constructed
of white pine; the rounded edges allowed the drops to easily slip past one
another during scene changes if they happened to bump into a neighboring line. Shipping
labor insured quality, and quality is essential for a sandwich batten. Poor quality wood will warp.
To attach the battens to the painted
scene on site was a fairly easy process. The backside of each sandwich batten
was nailed into the stage floor with cleat nails, forming an arrow-straight
line that would not shift. The painted scene was then tacked to the board, face
side up, and would become sandwiched with another pine board. The tacks were
placed about 4 to 6 inches apart. The top part of the sandwich batten was then
attached with screws or nails, thus sandwiching the fabric between the two
boards. The completed batten was then pried up from the stage floor and the
cleat nails hammered over.
After the sandwich batten was loose
from the stage floor, ½” holes were drilled into it to accept the operating
lines. In the case of the Tabor Opera House, many of the drops had three holes
to accommodate the three operating ropes.
The biggest discovery of the day was
that some of the scenery delivered to the Tabor Opera House (then Elks Opera
House) by the Kansas City Scenic Co. was previously installed at another
location. While cataloguing several of
the border drops, I noticed that there were five holes drilled for operating
lines, yet only three needed for this venue.
They were too consistent to be mistakes, yet necessary because the length;
each of these battens were over 40 feet, much longer than the proscenium
opening.
Later that afternoon, we noticed
that the painted grand border was also much wider than the proscenium. As the
piece was gently lowered, a line snapped. Amazingly, we hear the wood crack, but
batten did not break in half. Instead, the stage right side hung like a loose
noodle, obviously unsupported by any operating line. After we lowered the painted
border to the floor, we soon learned the cause for the line failure. The operating line did not fail; it was a
bridle that failed. Although there were five holes for operating lines in the
top of the batten, there were only three operating lines supporting the piece.
Holes numbered one and two, as well as holes numbered four and five, were
bridled with well-worn ¼-inch manila rope. The operating lines are thicker. The ¼-inch rope between holes numbered one
and two failed.
At this point it was time to take a
break and discuss options over birthday cake; yes, it was the executive
director’s birthday. Our final project
of the day was removing the top sandwich batten from the grand border, so it
could be safely stored until a new batten is attached. We were all grateful
that the line failed when it did, as there is ample time to address the problem
before the season begins. This would have been tragic mid-performance, or
during a busy time. There was a crew on stage to handle the problem. Small
blessings.
My first day at the Tabor Opera
House in Leadville, Colorado, was full of delightful surprises. After adjusting
to the altitude the night before, I tried to show up bright-eyed and
bushy-tailed. On site that morning were a television personality and a
photographer; this may be the last time I leave the house without caring what I
look like. Our project will be featured as an early morning local news story on
a Denver TV station tomorrow (Wednesday, February 5). A local photographer is
also documenting the process this week, and this is a great addition to the
Tabor’s archives. The momentum seems to be rolling, but much has to do with the
executive director Mary Ann Graham-Best. She is a gem and has thought of almost
everything, including the little oxygen bottles for those of us who are
adjusting to the altitude.
We started the day with
introductions and a brief orientation before heading upstairs to the theater. The
upstage wall was packed with scenery and our first task was to unroll as many
drops in front of the flat stock as possible, understanding that these were
mainly painted border pieces, and may a drop or two. A few flats were also piled on top of the
rolls, compressing everything, so they were soon unloaded.
The first piece that we unrolled was
extremely small, beautifully painted and likely from the original 1879 scenery
collection. The ornate gold and glass
jewels suggested that this piece may have been the grand border for the Tabor
Opera House before the Elks purchased the property and renovated the stage it
in 1901. The Elks greatly enlarged both the auditorium and stage house, adding
a fly loft to the building.
The remainder of scenery that we
unrolled on that day dates from 1902. It is scenery by the Kansas City Scenic
Co., contracted by Fred R. Megan. Megan would later become Thomas G. Moses’
future business partner, forming Moses & Megan Studio. It is a wonderful
connection for my research and provides additional context for my writing.
Now you have to understand about the
project’s environment. In winter, the Tabor Opera House is closed and bathroom
facilities unavailable. For our project,
a construction heater was rented and a “jiffy on the spot” secured. With
temperatures dropping into the single digits this week, I will be hard pressed
to not walk the extra fifty feet to the gas station when nature calls. The
stage house is quite warm, a balmy 54 degrees Fahrenheit. It is the perfect temperature
for our task, not too hot and not too cold.
The volunteer crew is a delightful
and I couldn’t ask for better help. The Silver Dollar Saloon across the street
is providing lunches this week, and is it great to relax in another historic
Leadville building that is nearby. So
far we are ahead of schedule. The only thing looming on the horizon at this
point is a series of winter storms. Hopefully the weather system will end
before me departure this Saturday.
I last visited the Tabor Opera House in June 2018. The renovated building opened on Nov. 20 1902, featuring scenery by Kansas City Scenic. For the next five days, I will be cataloguing the scenery currently stored in the stage area. With a crew of volunteers, we will carefully go through the collection piece by piece. Some of the drops are hanging, but the majority of pieces are stacked against the back wall. Here are a few pictures of their lovely front curtain.